The document summarizes the Anti-Friar Manifesto of 1888 in which 300 Filipinos marched in Manila to present a petition to the Governor General requesting the expulsion of all friars from the Philippines. They were protesting the domination of the friars, or "frailocracy", who were accused of interfering in politics and society, amassing wealth through large estates, and keeping Filipinos ignorant. The petition specifically called out Archbishop Payo for his anti-Filipino tendencies and support of parish priests defying a ban. However, the petition failed to reach the Queen and led to a crackdown on the leaders of the protest.
The document summarizes the Anti-Friar Manifesto of 1888 in which 300 Filipinos marched in Manila to present a petition to the Governor General requesting the expulsion of all friars from the Philippines. They were protesting the domination of the friars, or "frailocracy", who were accused of interfering in politics and society, amassing wealth through large estates, and keeping Filipinos ignorant. The petition specifically called out Archbishop Payo for his anti-Filipino tendencies and support of parish priests defying a ban. However, the petition failed to reach the Queen and led to a crackdown on the leaders of the protest.
The document summarizes the Anti-Friar Manifesto of 1888 in which 300 Filipinos marched in Manila to present a petition to the Governor General requesting the expulsion of all friars from the Philippines. They were protesting the domination of the friars, or "frailocracy", who were accused of interfering in politics and society, amassing wealth through large estates, and keeping Filipinos ignorant. The petition specifically called out Archbishop Payo for his anti-Filipino tendencies and support of parish priests defying a ban. However, the petition failed to reach the Queen and led to a crackdown on the leaders of the protest.
The document summarizes the Anti-Friar Manifesto of 1888 in which 300 Filipinos marched in Manila to present a petition to the Governor General requesting the expulsion of all friars from the Philippines. They were protesting the domination of the friars, or "frailocracy", who were accused of interfering in politics and society, amassing wealth through large estates, and keeping Filipinos ignorant. The petition specifically called out Archbishop Payo for his anti-Filipino tendencies and support of parish priests defying a ban. However, the petition failed to reach the Queen and led to a crackdown on the leaders of the protest.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
WHAT FOR?
The Anti-Friar Manifesto 1888
1. The focus of their protest was Archbishop - On March 1, 1888, a group of 300 Filipinos Pedro Payo (Anti-Filipino Archbishop) and marched through the city streets towards the the friars who were accused of having long Ayuntamiento or city hall of Manila to present interfering with the political and social life a petition to Gov. Gen Emilio Terrero of the Philippines. Through their hold of requesting the Queen Maria Christina of huge agricultural estates, they achieved Spain to expel all friars in the Philippines. economic power. - Doroteo Cortes and Marcelo H. Del Pilar 2. The friars were also accused of enriching wrote the petition that contained 810 themselves in violation with their signatures. monastic vows and kept the Filipinos - They were led by Doroteo Cortes, a Filipino ignorant by using religion to crush dissent. lawyer and gobernadorcillo of Santa Cruz, - In short, the friars were the reason the assisted by Marcelo H. Del Pilar (co-author Filipinos were backward, and the Philippines of the petition) and Jose A. Ramos. underdeveloped. - Procession was calm and unmarked by any - The friars’ intrusion into every aspect of the toward accident – much like a religious Filipino’s life was so encompassing as to procession. While marching the impel Marcelo H. del Pilar to denounce it as demonstrators cried “Viva la Reina” (“Long “frailocracia”- monastic rule- a government live the Queen!”), “Viva el Ejercito! (Long of, by and for the friars, a virtual stranglehold Live the Army!”), “Abajo los Frailes!” on the neck of the Filipino nation. (Down with the Friars!”). 3. Archbishop Payo showed anti-Filipino - They were protesting what they called the tendencies by opposing the teaching frailocracy – the rule of the friars in the Philippines. of Spanish language in schools. RESULT - Petitioners also accused Archbishop Payo in - The petition failed to reach the queen. supporting parish priests who defied the - The event led to Terrero’s term not being ban on corpses because it would be bad renewed. His successor overturned many of for business. his official moves made during his term: the Quiroga’s decree on funerals – ban on corpses in churches was rescinded, executive order prohibiting expulsion of some of the leaders and petitioners of the cholera victims. political procession were arrested and Benigno Quiroga – director general of imprisoned, and exiled. The successor also civil administration in Manila. ordered the arrest and exile of Cortes, Cholera – infectious disease that which forced Del Pilar to leave the causes severe watery diarrhea that country for Spain to evade arrest. leads to dehydration and worst, death.