Noli Me Tangere: A Diagnosis of Filipino Society By: Princess Alcala Yarren Mikhaela Silang Dhapnie Mae Reyes

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 26

NOLI ME TANGERE


A DIAGNOSIS OF FILIPINO SOCIETY
by: Princess Alcala
Yarren Mikhaela Silang
Dhapnie Mae Reyes
INDIOS BRAVOS

Used by Rizal to
call to have a sense
of national identity
as a Filipino
Rizal presented a proposal on
writing a novel about the

Philippines to the Circulo-
Hispano on January 02 1884
realizing the need for
Filipinos and the country to
be known in Europe.
NINAY
Published by Pedro Paterno

with the subtitle Custombres
Filipinas (Philippine Custom)

Delved on aspect of the


Filipino culture.
Ideas used
 by
Rizal in writing
a novel about
the Philippines
LUNA’s SPOLARIUM

 The spolarium was perceived
by Rizal as a reflection of
spirit of the social, moral and

political life of his time
because it clearly showed
mankind under severe or deal,
mankind unredeemed and
reason and aspiration and in an
open struggle
UNCLE TOM’S CABIN

Uncle Tom’s Cabin is
written by Harriet
 which
Beecher Stowe
portrayed the brutalities
committed by Americans
slave owners against
their negros slaves
The Wandering Dew

An anti-clerical novel written by


EUGENE SUE
The writing of the Noli Me
Tangere
1884 – Rizal started writing

the Noli Me Tangere
February 21, 1887 – finished
the novel at Berlin, Germany.
March 21, 1877 – came off
the press
Touch me not – was the
English translation of Rizal’s
First Literary masterpiece
Noli Me Tangere
 Noli Me Tangere revolves
around Crisostomo Ibarra who,
after a seven-year stay in

Europe to study, comes home to
his town of San Diego, brimming
with the desire to contribute to
the development of the
townspeople.  More specifically,
as a reformist, he aims to make
education accessible to more
people.  His idealism, however,
cannot bear fruit because of
insidious forces bent on
destroying him.  
Ibarra learns that
his father,
 Don
Rafael, had been
embroiled in a conflict
with Padre Damaso,
who eventually causes
his humiliation and
death.
 It is not only political power
that the friar wields; he has
also used power to seduce the

mother of Maria Clara,
Ibarra' s sweetheart.  Ibarra
has another enemy in the
person of Padre Salvi, who
lusts after Maria Clara.  It is
also Padre Salvi who almost
causes Ibarra ' s death at
the ground-
breaking ceremonies for the
school.  
Things come to a head when
Ibarra is implicated in a
failed uprising instigated by

Padre Salvi.  The young man
is imprisoned but is
eventually rescued by Elias,
whose life Ibarra has saved
in the past.  As the novel
ends, the thoroughly
disillusioned Ibarra sees a
bleak future.
 Crisóstomo Ibarra – Main
character of the novel. Represent
the affluent and liberal European-
educated Filipino. Civic-minded,

liberty-minded and patriotic, he
desired the education of the
people.
 Eliás – he represents the Filipino
masses in the novel.
 Maria Clara- She symbolizes the
Filipino womanhood in their
fidelity, coyness, and modesty
Don Rafael Ibarra-
Crisostomo’s father, he
symbolizes an affluent landlord

with a social conscience
Sisa- She is the mother of
Basilio and Crispin, she
illustrates the typical Filipino
mothers
Capitan Tiago- also known as
Don Anastacio delos Santos. He
represent the subservient
Filipino to the authorities to
protect his personal business
interest.
 Doña Victorina- She is a social
climber who symbolizes colonial
mentality among some Filipinos

 Doña Patrocinio- mistress of
the Alferez she was imprudent,
vulgar, cruel, and quarrelsome
 Pilosopo Tasyo- he perceived
Rizals epitome of philosopher
 The school master of San
Diego- an educated individual
who symbolize intellectual
dissatisfaction in the Filipino
society
The Filipino Society as pictured
in the Noli Me Tangere

 The government was administered
by self seekers motivated by the
desire to enrich themselves at the
expense of the people
 Corruption became so rampant due
to few honest and sincere official.
 The friars used the Catholic
Church to amass wealth and to
perpetuate themselves into power.
Noli Me Tangere as Charter
of Filipino Nationalism


To regain self confidence
Appreciate self-worth
Return to the heritage of
his ancestors
Assert himself as a co-
equal Spaniards
First Reaction to the
Noli
Works by Filipino writers from

1882-1896
 Paterno’s novel Ninay, published in
Maldrid in 1885
 Del Pilar’s La Soberania Monacal
and Graciano Lopez Jaena’s
Discursos y Articulos Varios
published in Barcelona in 1889 and
1891
 Antonio Luna’s Impresiones, which
came out in Madrid 1893
Antonio Regido is one of whose
congratulated Rizal for writing and
publishing the novel


Ferdinand Blumentrit praised Rizal
and become Rizal’s friend thru
correspondence
When Rizal returned to the
Philippines, reations for and against
the Noli Me Tangere suface
Archbishop Payo was able to have a
copy of the Noli and sent the same
to the rector of UST for
examination on August 18,1887
The rector constituted a threeman
committee to pass judgement on the
novel.


August 30,1887
-committee submitted its report to
archbishop of Manila
It found the book heretical, impious
and scandalous in its religious aspect,
unpatriotic, subversive of public order
and offensive to the government of
Spain
Attacks and Defenses of the Noli
Me Tangere

 The attacks on Rzal’s Noli Me
Tangere were not only confined in
the Philippines but were also
staged in Mandrid.
 Senator Fernando Vida, Deputy
Luis M. de Pando and Prime
Minister Praxedes Mateo Sagasta
were among those who unjustly
lambasted and criticized Rizal and
his Noli in the two chambers of
Spanish Cortes in 1888 and 1889
ATTACKS OF THE NOLI ME
TANGERE

 Vicente Barrantes who attacked Rizal in
1889 by describingRizal as a man of
contradiction, whose criticisms of the
friars and the Spanish Regime
 Fr. Salvador Font who issued the official
censure of the Noli,tried to prevent the
circulation of the Novel by publishing a
few copies of his report
 Father Jose Rodriguez lauched a direct
attack on the Noli by issuing a series of
pamphlets under the title Cuestiones de
Sumo Interes
DEFENSES OF THE NOLI ME TANGERE
 Fr. Francisco Sanchez – Rizal’s

teacher in rhetoric at Ateneo
 Fr. Vicente Gracia – the translator
into tagalog of the Famous Imitation
of Christ under the pen name
Desiderio Magalang.
 Marcelo H. del Pilar – wrote the
pamphlet Caiingat Cayo ( Beware )
 Ferdinand Blumentritt- defense
stressed his Catholic orientation

You might also like