Posts by captain veg

Re: Wouldn't it be nice

40Kb is dangerously close to an entire 64Kb segment.

What's your point?

-A.

Re: where to start?

I seem not to expressed myself clearly.

So far as I know, Microsoft wrote all the code for Windows itself. I'm talking about projects which pull in code from the public domain.

-A.

Re: Boom and Bust Cycles

I was told at a technical college in, about 1978, not to bother with computer science because it was just a fad.

-A.

Re: I don't care that it only runs once - it should not run at all without my permission

I'm not keen on Microsoft not asking nicely before updating files that it supplied itself in the first place.

Trawling my entire filesystem for, what, we don't really know, is taking the piss.

-A.

more stable

Well yes, Windows for Warehouses contained code from the beta builds of what would emerge as Windows 95. The 32-bit disk access was so buggy that Microsoft recommended turning it off.

-A.

open sourced

As an additional bonus we could then compile it ourselves and not have to trust the frankly terrifying assurance that it has been virus-scanned. I'd be much better disposed to run it then.

Hold on, that's mad.

-A.

Re: there is still no official OneDrive client for the open source OS.

> Nextcloud

Looks a bit over the top for my purposes, and the server software doesn't appear to be in the Mint repositories.

Feel free to tell my I'm wrong.

-A.

Re: Fools errand

> People don't need their search results dressed up as a fake conversation

I would say that they also don't need their search results expressed as plausible but wrong opinion rather than objective fact.

Well, it seems that plenty of people do, in fact*, want plausible but wrong, but the species as a whole is doomed if that's what we get by default.

-A.

*With respect to Majikthise and Vroomfondel

Re: When the EEC was born

And yet pattern parts exist. And always did all through the period the the UK was in the EU.

-A.

Re: rubber stamp

Thank you for making my point for me.

-A.

Re: rubber stamp

Sorry that my "fuck" offended your sensibility.

You called me a liar.

You continue to call me a liar.

Is this what passes for debate around here? Beneath contempt.

-A.

Re: rubber stamp

I'm perfectly capable of answering, thanks. Unlike you, apparently, I have a working life to attend to.

I have not the slightest idea what your latest post is supposed to prove.

Kindly fuck off and stop wasting my time.

-A.

Re: rubber stamp

This is sophistry.

Do you deny that Liz Truss was sacked by the parliamentary Conservative party?

-A.

Re: rubber stamp

You can define anyone who works in an office as a "bureaucrat", if you like, but the commissioners are political appointees, selected by the sovereign and democratic governments of the member states.

Those member states could easily choose to put their commissioners to election if they so wished. They don't, because they don't want there to be an alternative pole of governance with similar or greater democratic legitimacy to their own governments. The EU has to go along with this because it is a treaty-based club of its members, and not a superstate.

You can believe what you like about what I know about my MEPs. Frankly I don't give a shit.

The point about what you choose to characterise as "private members bills" is that the UK legislature is a much more of a "rubber stamp" than the EU Parliament.

In the UK the government is *NOT* in the slightest way directly elected. The members of Parliament are directly elected; the Prime Minister and all of the cabinet and all of the rest of the payroll vote are appointed by whichever party happened to get the largest number of seats, even if without a majority of the popular vote.

Not a single UK citizen voted for Liz Truss to be PM. Or Sunak.

-A.

Re: rubber stamp

I think the questions in your final paragraph are somewhat moot since the UK is no longer a member. I can answer them, but then I'm still resident in an EU country. Let me pose a contra-question: can you name a single piece of legislation passed by the UK Parliament which was initiated by an ordinary member rather than the government? They are vanishingly rare.

As for not mattering, well, that's a view.

The Parliament scrutinises legislation and has formal powers to amend or reject it. It is not the function of the Parliament to initiate legislation. This is called separation of powers, and is widely regarded as A Good Thing. Informally, however, MEPs are free to suggest legislation to commissioners, and this happens quite often.

The Parliament can also sack the entire Commission. This is not merely theoretical; it has happened.

-A.

Re: rubber stamp

Not this one again.

The EU parliament amends legislation far more often than the House of Commons. It is extremely rare for HMG not to get its way due to the hopeless intermingling of executive and legislative functions in the Commons and the power this gives to the party whips.

As for corruption, pot, meet kettle.

Of course, if the European Parliament really were just a rubber stamp then the opportunities for corruption would be minimal. No one hands over a brown envelope stuffed with cash to a rubber stamper.

-A.

Re: Suspect Home Depot aren't the only one's...

I think that this deserves the response "fuck me".

To be clear, that is not an invitation to Facebook.

-A.

Re: Annnnnnnd...

Gosh.

We're genuinely not worthy.

-A.

Re: Annnnnnnd...

Generally if some fuckwit corporation insists on me giving them an email address, and if a moment's reflection reveals that there's no way they can validate it (e.g. airport WiFi where you have to provide an email address before you can access, but there is no way that they could email you an authorisation code because you don't yet have access to the WiFi) then I make up something in the domain <example.org>. It could be <example.com> or <example.net> with the same result. Don't quote me on this, but I believe that *.invalid works much the same.

I'm not sure where your 320 character limit came from. So far as I'm aware any combination of <user-name>@<domain>.<tld> is valid, and <user-name> can contain any otherwise reserved characters so long as it is quoted.

But sure, feed the fuckers really long garbage in the hope that it might break their suppositions about maximum length.

-A.

Re: Nope

Bless.

-A.

Re: Annnnnnnd...

At least now I know why Decathlon (in France, at least) tries to grab your email address rather than printing out a receipt at the tills.

It had puzzled me until now. If I don't want or need a receipt, which is possible, then I might appreciate the possibility of them not spraying tar and carbon on to dead tree. Though why, if that's an option, they continue to place hefty security staff next to the exit from the megashed is non-obvious. If I do want or need a receipt then I'd like a receipt. Not some trivially easily forged collection of bits sent to some random email address that I happen to chuck in their direction.

Naturally I have thusfar declined, just because of suspicion of things that I don't immediately understand. I need to recalibrate my naivety-cynicism balance again. I just don't have the imagination to compete with people who think up this kind of shit.

-A.

Kardashians

I know almost nothing about them other than they have big bums. That might not be true; I haven't met one.

-A.