So don't do it then.
-A.
2492 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Jun 2009
I'm getting to the point where I resent self-cancelling indicators. I'm perfectly capable of cancelling them myself, thank you, and I will do so at the appropriate time, not merely when it's mechanically feasible.
Self-driving cars look like some kind of product liability hell to me. For my own personal circumstances right now, I really don't get the point.
I've hired cars that tried their best to do driving stuff on their own, universally in a manner best described as utter crap.
Lane-(something)-detection. Feels like the steering wheel is falling off. Can't imagine why anyone might think that a good idea.
Automatic main/dip switching. Just rubbish. Never had so many oncoming drivers flash me.
Automatic handbrake engagement. Found myself in a snow-covered car park. The handbrake, operating on the rear wheels, refused to disengage because the rear wheels weren't turning, but sliding on the snow. Front wheels, driven, spun like mad because the handbrake on the rears wouldn't release.
I can operate the steering wheel, accelerator and brake perfectly well unaided, thanks. If you really have to do something then I am capable of ignoring your misguided recommendation to labour the engine by changing up too early.
-A.
From the article:
commonly used by cloud service providers to ensure that those with access to datacenter hardware cannot siphon secrets from tenant virtual machines
The answer, to state the bleedin' obvious, is simply not putting sensitive stuff in the cloud, also known as someone else's servers.
-A.
I don't need anything "new" from Outlook. I need it to act like an email client. In particular I need it to:
* At least allow the possibility of plain text by default, and to render it appropriately using a monospaced face.
* Let me easily see the full original source text of incoming messages.
* Properly quote, godammit! I never used ccMail and don't want its pre-internet conventions over RFC-formalised norms.
Until we're anywhere close to that I shall seek and use alternatives wherever possible.
-A.
Hmm. Haven't tried it, but presumably you end up with a bricked PC. Which might be more productive that Windows 11, but less useful than inserting a bootable medium containing something like Linux Mint and rebooting (and doing whatever is required by your firmware to get the machine to boot off the medium).
-A.
As a CS student in the mid-eighties, I spent an awful lot of time writing code on dumb terminals. Our main weapons were line editors.
One of my near-contemporaries (actually a year ahead) created a screen editor named EDT, modeled, I understand, on a DEC program of the same name. We weren't using DEC machines, so this was some feat.
Word got around pretty quickly that EDT let you do weird and wonderful things like seeing your entire source code file through a scrolling viewport and navigating it using the arrow keys on our dumb terminals. Just so long as it wasn't a teletype. There were still quite a few of those around. I dare say that the program was closely tied to the particular dumb terminals that we actually had on campus.
Then we were let loose on Unix, and someone got Emacs working on it. This was almost as obvious to use as EDT but programmable! About that time I splashed out on a DOS PC, and was extremely pleased to discover that you could run Emacs on that too. Add in a 300 baud modem and suddenly I didn't even need to visit the terminal room on campus.
So, I have good memories of Emacs. Haven't actually used it in nearly 40 years.
-A.
Clearly Microsoft has an unfair monopoly on inserting unwanted, intrusive and annoying ads directly into the Microsoft operating system.
They ought to be forced to open up this lucrative ad market to all comers who are prepared to pay a fair price.
Oh, hold on... didn't we pay for this Microsoft operating system in the first instance, probably as an unwitting surcharge on the hardware price?
As you were.
-A.
I have no principled objection to, say, the recording of the fact that I ran over a pressure strip on a road near my home in the pursuit of analysing traffic patterns.
I have every objection to the photographic recording of my mug whilst I did so on my bicycle. Or of my number plate whilst motorised.
There's data, and there's PII. The latter needs regulating to within a millimetre of its life.
-A.
Apparently there are people out there that use Gimp to do useful stuff. How did you find out how to use it?
I tried GIMPShop some years ago simply because you could follow Photoshop tutorials, which are easily findable.
In case it's not obvious, I'm not a graphic designer. Pinta is nearer my level, to be honest.
-A.
> Try living in France
I do.
> there is a conscious shift to interfacing with the unwashed primarily through apps for healthcare, banking, council and government. You don't "have" to use the apps, but your life becomes an order of magnitude more complex if you don't. Especially as an expat.
Haven't noticed that, and I don't know what you mean by "especially as an expat".
> And you know full well what "needless" bureaucracy is, and what "necessary" means in this context. Facetiousness is unbecoming.
No idea what your're talking about. No one who knows me has ever accused me of being facetious.
-A.
> the US rights holder can just say "OK, EU population is 7x that of France, you can have EU-wide rights for $7x million", which Canal+ would never accept.
Quite apart from single market regulation, contracts work by negotiation and agreement. Canal+ is big enough to offer one or two fingers to such a stupid proposition.
-A.
Everyone should have at minimum a 4K monitor. I got one when lockdown and work-from-home were mandated and, frankly, there's no going back.
That first Covid-induced purcahase was of 28" diagonal, making the pixels a bit small for my near-pensionable eyes. Upon return-to-office I demanded* a 32-inch 4K screen. It's quite usable.
-A.
* If you work with designers who habitually use Figma, as I do, then maximal screen estate becomes essential rather than just nice to have. TBH an even bigger screen with even more pixels would be much better.
I bought an M1 Mac mini because it seemed a really nice trade off between price and computing power.
I had to double up my usual RAM expectation for future proofing, which cost quite a lot more than a subsequent upgrade probably would have for a non-Apple device. Nonetheless it was, and is, pretty wonderful.
And yet I hardly ever use it. Commodity PC hardware isn't as good, but it is good enough. I run Windows 10 in a VM, on top of Linux on vanilla x86, perfectly well.
Doesn't bode well for Windows 11.
-A.
I once boarded a European short-haul flight and was seated next to a Mac-wielding American youth who insisted on interacting with the lappie right up until the moment that the cabin crew demanded the switching off of portable devices. At which point he simply closed the lid.
I pointed out that this was not, in fact, switching it off.
Incomprehension followed.
-A.