DVCSAnalysis - support - Analysis of Git and Mercurial - Google CodeCode Archive Skip to content Google About Google Privacy Terms
RockStarProgrammer - The Differences Between Mercurial and Git
The Differences Between Mercurial and Git I realized recently that I've been using distributed revision control for several years now. It's always been an exciting landscape for me, although it's been a bit lonely. I used gnu arch for most of my code for a long time, and dabbled some in darcs at the same time. It wasn't until I saw Brian O'Sullivan's tech talk on mercurial that I started wondering
Git vs. Mercurial: Please Relax
Everyone’s up in arms to embrace distributed version control as the new must-have tool for the developer in the know. Though many people have not yet migrated from Subversion, those that have almost invariably extoll the virtues of their particular choice. But though all of the major DVCS’s have features that set them above the previous generation of centralized systems, none stands head-and-shoul
Mercurial, Subversion, and Wesley Snipes
People keep asking me why I don't talk more about Mercurial in this series of blog entries. There's a simple answer to that question: Mercurial isn't very interesting. Wait, that didn't come out quite right. Let me try again: Git is Wesley Snipes. Mercurial is Denzel Washington Hmm, that probably needs further explanation. First let me give a little background. I am the founder of a version con
1
ランã‚ング
ランã‚ング
ランã‚ング
リリースã€éšœå®³æƒ…å ±ãªã©ã®ã‚µãƒ¼ãƒ“スã®ãŠçŸ¥ã‚‰ã›
最新ã®äººæ°—エントリーã®é…ä¿¡
処ç†ã‚’実行ä¸ã§ã™
j次ã®ãƒ–ックマーク
kå‰ã®ãƒ–ックマーク
lã‚ã¨ã§èªã‚€
eコメント一覧を開ã
oページを開ã
{{#tags}}- {{label}}
{{/tags}}