ãããã¤ã³ã¹ãã¼ã«ä»£è¡¨ã®ã©ã¤ãããã¯ããã°
ãã®ã¨ãã大ããªãµã¼ãã¹ãæã£ã¦ã大ããªä¼æ¥ãéç¨ããã¦ã§ããµã¤ãã«ã¤ãã¦èãããã¨ãå¤ãã£ãã®ã§ãã¡ãã£ã¨æ¸ãæ®´ã£ã¦ã¿ãã¨ãã¾ãã ä¸è¦ããã¨å¤§ä¼æ¥ã£ã¦ã®ã¯äººããããããããè³éãããããããããå°ããªä¼æ¥ã¨ç«¶äºã«ãªã£ã¦ããç°¡åã«ãããè¸ã¿ã¤ã¶ãã¦ãã¾ãããããªå°è±¡ãåãã¾ããããããããããªã«ç°¡åãããªããã ãã£ã¦ããã®ãã¤ããã¼ã·ã§ã³ã®ã¸ã¬ã³ãã§ããã大ä¼æ¥ç ã®ã¸ã¬ã³ãã§ãããã§ãã¦ã§ãã®ä¼æ¥ã«ããä¸ã¤å½ã¦ã¯ã¾ãã¸ã¬ã³ãããããªãã¨æè¿æãã¾ãã ã¯ã¦ãªãã¤ã¢ãªã¼ã®ãã¼ã¯ã¼ããã¼ã¸ã«ãYahoo! ãã¥ã¼ã¹ã®ãããã¯ãã¼ã¸ãããªã³ã¯ããããã¨ãããã¾ãããã®ãã¥ã¼ã¹ã Yahoo! Japan ã®ããããã¼ã¸ã«è¼ã£ã¦ãããããã®ã ã¨ããã¼ã¯ã¼ããã¼ã¸ã¸ã®ç¬éæ大ãã©ãã£ãã¯ãæããããã¨ã«ãªãã¾ããæè¿ã¯å¯¾çãç·´ã£ãã®ã§åé¡ãªãã®ã§ãããä¸ææ㯠Yahoo! ãããã«è¼ã£ã¦ããã¥ã¼
ãã®ãã¡ã¤ã³ã¯ ãåå.com ããåå¾ããã¾ããã ãåå.com 㯠GMOã¤ã³ã¿ã¼ãããã°ã«ã¼ã(æ ª) ãéå¶ããå½å ã·ã§ã¢No.1ã®ãã¡ã¤ã³ç»é²ãµã¼ãã¹ã§ãã â»è¡¨ç¤ºä¾¡æ ¼ã¯ãå ¨ã¦ç¨è¾¼ã§ãã â»ãµã¼ãã¹å質ç¶æã®ãããä¸æçã«å¯¾è±¡ã¨ãªãæéã¸ä¸å®å²åã®ããµã¼ãã¹ç¶æ調æ´è²»ããå ç®ããã¦ããã ãã¾ãã
November 2005 Does "Web 2.0" mean anything? Till recently I thought it didn't, but the truth turns out to be more complicated. Originally, yes, it was meaningless. Now it seems to have acquired a meaning. And yet those who dislike the term are probably right, because if it means what I think it does, we don't need it. I first heard the phrase "Web 2.0" in the name of the Web 2.0 conference in 2004
ã©ã³ãã³ã°
ã©ã³ãã³ã°
ã©ã³ãã³ã°
ãªãªã¼ã¹ãé害æ å ±ãªã©ã®ãµã¼ãã¹ã®ãç¥ãã
ææ°ã®äººæ°ã¨ã³ããªã¼ã®é ä¿¡
å¦çãå®è¡ä¸ã§ã
j次ã®ããã¯ãã¼ã¯
kåã®ããã¯ãã¼ã¯
lãã¨ã§èªã
eã³ã¡ã³ãä¸è¦§ãéã
oãã¼ã¸ãéã
{{#tags}}- {{label}}
{{/tags}}