ãŠæ°—ã«å…¥ã‚Šã®ã‚²ãƒ¼ãƒ ã§ã‚‚ã€å¿ƒã«å¹³å’Œã‚’ã‚‚ãŸã‚‰ã•ãªã„
ã¯ã¦ãªåŒ¿åダイアリー
ãŠæ°—ã«å…¥ã‚Šã®ã‚²ãƒ¼ãƒ ã§ã‚‚ã€å¿ƒã«å¹³å’Œã‚’ã‚‚ãŸã‚‰ã•ãªã„
186(fold_bl)
\(a^{b^c}\) djbãŒãªã‚“ã‹è¨€ã£ã¦ã‚‹ã®ã§ãƒ¡ãƒ¢ã€‚ https://twitter.com/hashbreaker/status/367790984869851137:embed#Often fascinating to see how bad science spreads: e.g. "lattice-based crypto is the only crypto with worst-case-to-average-case reductions." https://twitter.com/cdavidcash/status/367857134303600640:embed#@hashbreaker What are the other examples? OTP? How is it "bad science" to miss counterexamples, as oppo
1
リリースã€éšœå®³æƒ…å ±ãªã©ã®ã‚µãƒ¼ãƒ“スã®ãŠçŸ¥ã‚‰ã›
最新ã®äººæ°—エントリーã®é…ä¿¡
処ç†ã‚’実行ä¸ã§ã™
j次ã®ãƒ–ックマーク
kå‰ã®ãƒ–ックマーク
lã‚ã¨ã§èªã‚€
eコメント一覧を開ã
oページを開ã
{{#tags}}- {{label}}
{{/tags}}