cOAlition Sã¯ã10æ28æ¥ã"Peer-reviewed preprints and the Publish-Review-Curate model"ã¨é¡ããè¨äºãå ¬éããã ããã¯ãæ»èªä»ããã¬ããªã³ãã¢ãã«ããã³åã¢ãã«ã«ãã¥ã¬ã¼ã·ã§ã³â»1ããã»ã¹ã追å ããPRCï¼Publish-Review-Curateï¼ã¢ãã«ã®æ¦è¦ãåé¡ç¹ãããã³ãã®è§£æ±ºçãªã©ã示ãããã®ã æ¬è¨äºã¯ã両ã¢ãã«ãæ¦èª¬ããå¾ããã¬ããªã³ããµã¼ãã¹ãæä¾ããæ»èªããå¾æ¥ã®ã¸ã£ã¼ãã«ã®ããã«ãæ£å¼ãªæ±ºå®ï¼"validated"ã¾ãã¯"not validated"ï¼ãä¸ããã®ã§ã¯ãªããåã«è¯å®çã»å¦å®ç両æ¹ãå«ããè¦è§£ã示ããã ãã§ãããã¨ãªã©ã«è¨åãèªè ãæ»èªãããã¯ãã¥ã¬ã¼ãããããã¬ããªã³ããæ¤è¨¼æ¸ã¿ã¨èª¤è§£ããã¨ãã£ãåé¡ãå¼ãèµ·ããå¯è½æ§ããããªã©ã¨ææããã ãã®ããã§ãPCIï¼Peer Commu
æ»èªã«é¢ããè±å½ç©çå¦ä¼åºçå±ã®å ±åæ¸ï¼2024å¹´ï¼ åéæ¸èªé¨å½å è³æ課ã»æç¨åï¼ãããããï¼ âã¯ããã« è±å½ç©çå¦ä¼ï¼Institute of Physicsï¼IOPï¼ã®åºçé¨éã§ããè±å½ç©çå¦ä¼åºçå±ï¼IOP Publishingï¼IOPPï¼ã¯ãç©çå¦ã®åºç¯ãªé åã«åã¶100以ä¸ã®å¦è¡éèªãåè¡ãã¦ãããIOPPã¯2024å¹´5æ14æ¥ãè«ææ»èªã®è¿æ³ã«å¯¾ããç©çå¦è ã³ãã¥ããã£ã®æè¦ã調æ»ããå ±åæ¸âState of peer review 2024âï¼ä»¥ä¸ãå ±åæ¸ãï¼ãå ¬éãããæ¬ç¨¿ã¯ãã®æ¦è¦ç´¹ä»ãç®çã¨ããã æ»èªã¯å¦åã®é²æ©ã¨èª å®æ§ãæ ä¿ããéè¦ãªå¶åº¦ã ããè¿å¹´ã¯ãã®ã³ã¹ããå ¬å¹³æ§ãªã©ã«ã¤ãã¦åé¡ã表é¢åããå¦è¡æ å ±æµéã®ç¦ç¹ã®ä¸ã¤ã¨ãªã£ã¦ããï¼CA1961ãCA2001ãCA2048åç §ï¼ãIOPPã2020å¹´ã®åæ§ã®èª¿æ»ï¼ä»¥ä¸ãåå調æ»ãï¼ã«å¼ãç¶ã調æ»ãå®æ½ããèæ¯ã«ã¯
2024å¹´9æ12æ¥ãç±³ã»ã«ãªãã©ã«ãã¢å¤§å¦ããµã³ã¼ã«ã¹æ ¡ã®ææããElsevier社ãå§ãã¨ãã大æå¦è¡åºç社6社ã«å¯¾ãã¦ãæ»èªå ±é ¬ãè¤æ°ã®éèªã¸ã®åææ稿çã«é¢ããåºçæ £ç¿ãå·¡ã£ã¦è¨´è¨ãèµ·ããããã¨ããè¤æ°ã®ã¡ãã£ã¢ã§å ±ãããã¦ãã¾ãã Academic publishers face class action over âpeer reviewâ pay, other restrictionsï¼Reuters, 2024/9/14ï¼ https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/academic-publishers-face-class-action-over-peer-review-pay-other-restrictions-2024-09-13/ Scientists File Antitrust Lawsuit Against Journ
æ°åãè¿åãæ¸è©ãåè³å³æ¸ãã¤ãã³ãã«é¢ãããæ¡å ãã³ã©ã ãªã©ãæã«1åãã¡ã¼ã«ã§ãå±ããã¾ããç»é²ã»é ä¿¡ã¯ç¡æã§ãã以ä¸ã®ãã©ã¼ã ãããç³ãè¾¼ã¿ãã ããã
å¿ è¦ãªè«æãèªããªãââãå¦è¡èªã®è³¼èªæãé«é¨°ããè³¼èªå¥ç´ãæã¡åã大å¦ãåºã¦ããããããªãã°ã¨è¿å¹´ãè«æãã¤ã³ã¿ã¼ãããä¸ã§ç¡æå ¬éããè¦è¿ãã«ãæ²è¼æããåãåºç社ãå¢ããç 究è ãããäºéåãã ãã¨ä¸æºãé«ã¾ã£ã¦ããã å¦åã®ææã¯äººé¡ã®å ±æ財ç£ã¨ãããã¹ããã®ããåºç社ã¯ããããããã¨ã®æ¹å¤ãèããããåºç社å´ã¯ã©ãèãã¦ããã®ããå½éç§å¦èªã®ãããã«åè¨ããããã¤ãã£ã¼ãçºè¡å ã®æ¥æ¬æ³äººç¤¾é·ãç´æããã ãç 究è ãµãã¼ããå½¹å²ã åæã«å¿ããã®ã¯ãè±å½ã¨ãã¤ãã«æ ç¹ãç½®ãå¦è¡åºç大æãã·ã¥ããªã³ã¬ã¼ãã¤ãã£ã¼ãã®æ¥æ¬æ³äººç¤¾é·ãã¢ã³ãã¯ã¼ã³ã»ãã¼ã±æ°ãæ±äº¬é½æ¸¯åºã®åæ³äººãªãã£ã¹ã§ã¤ã³ã¿ãã¥ã¼ãããã¨ãã§ããã ãç§ãã¡åºç社ã®å½¹å²ã¯ç 究è ã®ãµãã¼ãã ãç 究è ãç 究ããè¿ éãã¤å¹æçã«åºçã§ããããæ¯æ´ãããµã¼ãã¹ãæä¾ãã¦ããããç©ãããªå£èª¿ã§åãåºãããã¼ã±æ°ã¯ããç¶ããããç 究ãµ
åç è«æã®æ»èªã«é¢ãã審è°ã«ã¤ã㦠令åï¼å¹´ï¼ï¼ï¼ï¼ï¼å¹´ï¼ï¼æï¼ï¼æ¥ æ¥ æ¬ å¦ è¡ ä¼ è° i ãã®åçã¯ãæé¨ç§å¦çããã®å¯©è°ä¾é ¼ãåãã¦ãæ¥æ¬å¦è¡ä¼è°ã«è¨ç½®ããç§å¦è å§å¡ ä¼å¦è¡ä½å¶åç§ä¼åã³ååç§ä¼è«ææ»èªã®æ義åã³èª²é¡ã«é¢ããæ¤è¨å°å§å¡ä¼ãä¸å¿ã¨ãª ã審è°ãè¡ã£ããã®ã§ãããæ¥æ¬å¦è¡ä¼è°ã¨ãã¦å ¬è¡¨ãããã®ã§ããã æ¥æ¬å¦è¡ä¼è°ç§å¦è å§å¡ä¼å¦è¡ä½å¶åç§ä¼ å§å¡é· åæ å¿ (第ä¸é¨ä¼å¡) æ±äº¬å¤§å¦å¤§å¦é¢å·¥å¦ç³»ç 究ç§ææ å¯å§å¡é· æ©æ¬ ä¼¸ä¹ (第ä¸é¨ä¼å¡) é¢è¥¿å¦é¢å¤§å¦æå¦é¨ææ å¹¹äº åå· å°ç¾ (第ä¸é¨ä¼å¡) æ±å大å¦å¤§å¦é¢å·¥å¦ç 究ç§ææ å¹¹äº ä½ã æ¨è£ä¹ (第äºé¨ä¼å¡) ä¹å·å¤§å¦çä½é²å¾¡å»å¦ç 究æ ã» ç¹å½ææã ä¹å·å¤§å¦ é«çç 究é¢ã»ç¹å¥ä¸»å¹¹ææ å°æ å³å¸ (第ä¸é¨ä¼å¡) 大éªå¤§å¦åèªææã»å¤§éªå¤§å¦ï¼£ï¼¯ãã¶ã¤ ã³ã»ã³ã¿ã¼ç¹ä»»ææãå½ç«ç 究éçºæ³äºº ç§å¦æè¡æ¯èæ©æ§ç¤¾ä¼æ
2023å¹´7æ5æ¥ãç±³å½æ å ±æ¨æºåæ©æ§ï¼NISOï¼ã¯ãæ»èªã«é¢ããæ¨æºç¨èªéâPeer Review Terminology Standardâï¼ANSI/NISO Z39.106-2023ï¼ãå ¬éããã¨çºè¡¨ãã¾ããã çºè¡¨ã«ããã¨ãç¨èªéã¯ä¸»ã«ãªã¼ãã³æ»èªã念é ã«ãæ»èªã«é¢ããå®ç¾©ãç¨èªã®æ¨æºåãè¡ã£ããã®ã§ãç°ãªãã¸ã£ã¼ãã«ã®æ»èªæ £ç¿ãè©ä¾¡ã»æ¯è¼ããããããæ»èªããã»ã¹ã®éæåã«è³ãããã¨ãä¼å³ãã¦ãã¾ãã å¶ä½ã®èæ¯ã¨ãã¦ã¯ãå½éSTMåºç社åä¼ã2019å¹´ã«æ»èªç¨èªã«é¢ããã¯ã¼ãã³ã°ã°ã«ã¼ããç«ã¡ä¸ãã¦ãå®ç¾©ãé¢é£ãããã¹ããã©ã¯ãã£ã¹ãã¾ã¨ãããã®ãçºè¡¨ãããã¨ãNISOã2021å¹´ã«åã¯ã¼ãã³ã°ã°ã«ã¼ãã®æ´»åãå¼ãç¶ãã§ãä»åã®ç¨èªéå ¬éã«è³ã£ããã¨ãè¿°ã¹ããã¦ãã¾ãã NISO Announces Publication of the Peer Review Terminol
ASAPbioã¯ã5æ24æ¥ã"Walking the walk: open communication and review in a congress on open science"ã¨é¡ããè¨äºãçºè¡¨ããã æ¬è¨äºã¯ã2022å¹´11æ23æ¥ã»24æ¥ã«éå¬ãããä¼è°"Iberoamerican Congress for Open Science"ã«ããã¦æ¡ç¨ããããªã¼ãã³ãµã¤ã¨ã³ã¹ã®æ¹éã«å¾ã£ããè«æã®æåºããæ»èªã»å ¬éã¾ã§ã®ããã»ã¹ãç´¹ä»ãã¦ããã åºçããã»ã¹ã«ãSciELO Preprintsãã©ãããã©ã¼ã ãæ¡ç¨ããã®çç±ã¨ãã¦ããªã¼ãã³ãµã¤ã¨ã³ã¹ã®ååã«æ²¿ã£ã¦è«æããªã¼ãã³ã«ã§ãããã¨ãã¤ããã¢ã¡ãªã«ã«ç¦ç¹ããã¦ãä¼è°ã®ããããªãã£ã·ã£ã«è¨èªã®ã¹ãã¤ã³èªã¨ãã«ãã¬ã«èªã«å¯¾å¿ã§ãããã¨ãªã©ãæãã¦ããã æ»èªããã»ã¹ãéæåãããããå ¬éæ»èªãæ¡ç¨ããæ»èªè åã®å ¬éã¯æ»èªè ã®æ±º
ä¸è¬çãªå¦è¡èªãåºçãããéã«ã¯ãæ稿ãããè«æãå°éã®ç 究è ãèªãã§å 容ã®å¦¥å½æ§ãªã©ããã§ãã¯ããå¦è¡èªã«æ²è¼ãããå¦ãã®å¤æãè¡ããæ»èªãã¨ããããã»ã¹ãè¡ããã¾ãããããå¾æ¥ã®æ»èªæ¹å¼ã§ã¯ãè«æã®èè ã«å¯¾ãããã¤ã¢ã¹ãçããä¸å¹³çã§ãããã¨ãææããã¦ãã¾ãããããã§ãã¤ã®ãªã¹çæ å¦ä¼ã¯æ»èªè ã¨èè ã®ä¸¡æ¹ãå¿ååããæ°ããªæ»èªããã»ã¹ã®æ¤è¨¼ãè¡ãã¾ããã Doubleâblind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor decisions at an ecology journal https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14259 Double-anonymous peer review reduces reviewer bias, finds three-year trial - British
æ»èªéç¨ã«é¢ããã¬ã¤ãã©ã¤ã³ï¼å ¬éç¨ï¼ ãæå人é¡å¦ã第27æç·¨éå§å¡ä¼ï¼2017å¹´6æ28æ¥ç·¨éå§å¡ä¼æ¿èªï¼ã第29æç·¨éå§å¡ä¼ï¼2021å¹´7æ4æ¥ç·¨éå§å¡ä¼ä¿®æ£æ¿èªï¼ 1. æ稿è ã®æ¹ã¸ æ»èªéç¨ã¯ãæ稿è ã»æ»èªè ã»ç·¨éå§å¡ä¼ã®ä¸è ã交ããååä½æ¥ã«ãã£ã¦æãç«ã£ã¦ãã¾ãããã®éç¨ãåæ»ã«é²ããããã以ä¸ã®ç¹ããäºæ¿ããã³çæã®ãããå稿ããä½æãã ããã ãæ»èªéç¨ã®æµãã ã» æ稿å稿ã«ã¤ãã¦ãã¾ãç·¨éå§å¡ä¼å ã§æ»èªéå§ã®å¯å¦ã®å¤æããã¾ãï¼ããã¯ããã¬æ»èªãã¨å¼ã°ãã¾ãï¼ã ã» æ»èªéå§å¯ã®å ´åãæ稿è ã«ããæ»èªã«é¢ããå¸æãèæ ®ãã¤ã¤ãå ¬æ£ãã¤é©åãªæ»èªãå¯è½ãªå¦ä¼å¡2å以ä¸ã«æ»èªãä¾é ¼ããå諾ã®ã®ã¡æ»èªã®ä½æ¥ãä¾é ¼ãã¾ãã ã» ç·¨éå§å¡ä¼ã¯ãæ»èªè ã«ãããæ»èªæè¦ãåã³ãæ»èªã³ã¡ã³ããããã¼ã¹ã«ãæ»èªè¦å®ã念é ã«ç½®ãã¤ã¤ç·åçã«æ¤è¨ãã¦ãæ»èªçµæããä½æããæ稿è ã«éç¥ãã¾ã
ãªãªã¼ã¹ãé害æ å ±ãªã©ã®ãµã¼ãã¹ã®ãç¥ãã
ææ°ã®äººæ°ã¨ã³ããªã¼ã®é ä¿¡
å¦çãå®è¡ä¸ã§ã
j次ã®ããã¯ãã¼ã¯
kåã®ããã¯ãã¼ã¯
lãã¨ã§èªã
eã³ã¡ã³ãä¸è¦§ãéã
oãã¼ã¸ãéã
{{#tags}}- {{label}}
{{/tags}}