MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Master Teachers SY 2023-2024

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Review
KRA Performance Ratee Rater Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic KRA 1: 1. Modeled 7.00% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education effective (COT) rating sheet/s done
Content through onsite / face-to-face / in-
Services applications of
Knowledge content person classroom observation.
and If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
knowledge classes are not implemented, Efficiency
Pedagogy within and 1. through observation of
across synchronous / asynchronous
curriculum teaching in other modalities; or
teaching areas. 2. through observation of a
(PPST 1.1.3) demonstration teaching* via LAC Timeliness
session.
and proof of attendance of
colleague/s
2. Evaluated 7.00% 1. Proof/s of attendance in Quality
with colleagues coaching and mentoring
the sessions/meetings/LAC
effectiveness of sessions / FGDs / other collegial
discussions that highlights the
teaching objective Efficiency
strategies that 2. Minutes/Notes of coaching and
promote learner mentoring sessions/meetings /
achievement in FGDs / other collegial discussions
literacy and that highlights the objective
numeracy. 3. Reflection notes of teachers on Timeliness
(PPST 1.4.3) the coaching and mentoring
sessions/meetings/LAC
sessions / FGDs/other collegial
discussions that highlights the
objective with proof/s of
attendance
Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Review
KRA Performance Ratee Rater Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
4. Performance Monitoring and
Coaching Form (PMCF), with
annotations highlighting the
objective
3. Developed 7.00% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
and applied (COT) rating sheet/s done
effective through onsite / face-to-face / in-
teaching person classroom observation.
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
strategies to classes are not implemented, Efficiency
promote critical 1. through observation of
and creative synchronous / asynchronous
thinking, as well teaching in other modalities; or
as other higher- 2. through observation of a
order thinking demonstration teaching* via LAC Timeliness
skills. session.
(PPST 1.5.3) and proof of attendance of
colleague/s

KRA 2: 4. Modeled and 6.00% Classroom Observation Tool Quality

supported (COT) rating sheet/s done
Learning through onsite / face-to-face / in-
colleagues in
Environme the proficient person classroom observation.
nt & If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
use of Mother classes are not implemented, Efficiency
Diversity of Tongue, Filipino 1. through observation of
Learners and English to synchronous / asynchronous
improve teaching in other modalities; or
teaching and 2. through observation of a
learning, as well demonstration teaching* via LAC Timeliness
as to develop session.
the learners’ and proof of attendance of
pride of their colleague/s
language,
heritage and
culture.
(PPST 1.6.3)
5. Exhibited 6.00% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
effective (COT) rating sheet/s done
strategies that through onsite / face-to-face / in-
ensure safe and person classroom observation.
Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Review
KRA Performance Ratee Rater Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
secure learning If onsite / face-to-face / in-person Efficiency
environments to classes are not implemented,
enhance 1. through observation of
learning through synchronous / asynchronous
teaching in other modalities; or
the consistent 2. through observation of a Timeliness
implementation demonstration teaching* via LAC
of policies, session.
guidelines and and proof of attendance of
procedures. colleague/s
(PPST 2.1.3)
6. Exhibit 6.00% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
effective (COT) rating sheet/s done
practices to through onsite / face-to-face / in-
foster learning person classroom observation.
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
environments classes are not implemented, Efficiency
that promote 1. through observation of
fairness, respect synchronous / asynchronous
and care to teaching in other modalities; or
encourage 2. through observation of a
learning. demonstration teaching* via LAC Timeliness
(PPST 2.2.3) session.
and proof of attendance of
colleague/s
KRA 3: 7. Exhibited a 7.00% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
learner-centered (COT) rating sheet/s done
Curriculum through onsite / face-to-face / in-
culture that
and promotes person classroom observation.
Planning If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
success by classes are not implemented, Efficiency
using effective 2. through observation of
teaching synchronous / asynchronous
strategies that teaching in other modalities; or
respond to their 3. through observation of a
linguistic, demonstration teaching* via LAC Timeliness
cultural, socio- session.
economic and and proof of attendance of
religious colleague/s
backgrounds.
(PPST 3.2.3)
Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Review
KRA Performance Ratee Rater Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
8. Developed 7.00% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
and applied (COT) rating sheet/s done
teaching through onsite / face-to-face / in-
strategies to person classroom observation.
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
address classes are not implemented, Efficiency
effectively the 4. through observation of
needs of synchronous / asynchronous
learners from teaching in other modalities; or
indigenous 5. through observation of a
groups. demonstration teaching* via LAC Timeliness
(PPST 3.5.3) session.
and proof of attendance of
colleague/s
9. Modeled to 7.00% At least one (1) lesson plan (e.g., Quality
colleagues the DLP, DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL,
setting of Lesson Exemplars, and the likes)
achievable and or one lesson from a self-learning
module, developed by the ratee* Efficiency
challenging and used in instruction, with
learning achievable and appropriate
outcomes that learning outcomes that are
are aligned with aligned with the learning
Timeliness
learning competencies as shown in any
competencies to one (1) of the following:
cultivate a • lecture/discussion
culture of • activity/activity sheet
excellence for all • performance task
• rubric for assessing
learners. performance using criteria that
(PPST 4.2.3) appropriately describe the target
output
and demonstrated in a LAC
session as attested by the LAC
Coordinator/ Approving Authority
with proof of attendance of
colleague/s
10. Used 7.00% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
effective (COT) rating sheet/s done
strategies for through onsite / face-to-face / in-
providing timely, person classroom observation.
Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Review
KRA Performance Ratee Rater Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
KRA 4: accurate and If onsite / face-to-face / in-person Efficiency
constructive classes are not implemented,
Assessme 6. through observation of
feedback to
nt and encourage synchronous / asynchronous
Reporting teaching in other modalities; or
learners to 7. through observation of a Timeliness
reflect on and demonstration teaching* via LAC
improve their session.
own learning. and proof of attendance of
(PPST 5.3.3) colleague/s
11. Worked 7.00% 1. Approved LAC/FGD Plan Quality
collaboratively 2. Any proof of communication
with colleagues with colleagues (e.g., text/chat)
to analyze and 3. Any proof of collaborative
review (e.g., accomplishment
utilize report) of Efficiency
assessment • learner assessment data
data to modify • intervention materials developed
practices and for remediation/
programs to • enhancement/ enhancement/
further support enrichment activities Timeliness
learner progress 4. Minutes of coaching and
and mentoring sessions, meetings,
achievement. LAC/FGD session, or other
collegial discussions, with proof of
(PPST 5.5.3) attendance
5. Performance Monitoring and
Coaching Form (PMCF), with
annotations highlighting
interpretation of monitoring and
evaluation strategies of
attainment data
12. Guided 7.00% 1. Proof/s of attendance in Quality
colleagues to coaching and mentoring
strengthen sessions/meetings/LAC
relationships sessions / FGDs / other collegial
discussions that highlights the
with parents/ objective Efficiency
guardians and 2. Minutes/Notes of coaching and
the wider school mentoring sessions/meetings /
community to FGDs / other collegial discussions
Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Review
KRA Performance Ratee Rater Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
maximize their that highlights the objective Timeliness
involvement in 3. Reflection notes of teachers on
the educative the coaching and mentoring
process. sessions/meetings/LAC
sessions / FGDs/other collegial
(PPST 6.2.3) discussions that highlights the
objective with proof/s of
attendance
4. Performance Monitoring and
Coaching Form (PMCF), with
annotations highlighting the
objective
KRA 5: 13. Contributed 7.00% 1. Approved activity/project Quality
actively to proposal for a webinar, retooling,
Personal upskilling, and other training/
professional
Growth networks within seminar/ workshop with
and accomplishment report
and between 2. Approved activity/project Efficiency
Profession schools to proposal for benchmarking or
al improve innovation with accomplishment
Developme knowledge and report
to enhance 3. Certificate as contributor to
nt practice. LRMDS Timeliness
(PPST 7.3.3) 4. Certificate of completion in a
course/training
5. Certificate of recognition/
speakership in a webinar,
retooling, upskilling, and other
training/ seminar/ workshop
6. Any proof of participation in
school LAC sessions (online/face-
to-face) certified by the LAC
Coordinator
7. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
14. Initiated 7.00% 1. Proof/s of attendance in Quality
professional coaching and mentoring
reflections and sessions/meetings/LAC
promote sessions / FGDs / other activities
Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Review
KRA Performance Ratee Rater Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
learning that highlights the objective Efficiency
opportunities 2. Approved LAC/FGD Plan
with colleagues 3. Training matrix of LAC
to improve sessions highlighting the
teacher’s role
practice. 4. Minutes of LAC sessions/FGDs Timeliness
(PPST 7.4.3) highlighting the teacher’s role,
with proof of attendance
5. Performance Monitoring and
Coaching Form (PMCF)
6. Personal notes/reflections of
colleagues on regional/ division/
school-led INSETs and/or other
trainings supervised/ conducted
by teacher
7. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Plus Factor 15. Performed 5.00% Any one (1) proof that the master Quality
various related teacher:
works / ● served as facilitator / speaker
activities that ● served as demonstration
teacher
contribute to ● served as a member of the Efficiency
the teaching- technical working group
learning ● served as OIC in the absence
process. of the principal
● represented the principal in
meetings and conference Timeliness
● observed classes of Teachers I-
III
● assisted the school selection
committee in the evaluation of
credentials when hiring or
promoting teachers
● served in a committee
● served as adviser to co-
curricular activities
● served as coordinator /
chairperson
● authored / contributed to a book
or journal
● coached and mentored learners
Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Review
KRA Performance Ratee Rater Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
in competitions
● mentored pre-service / in-
service teachers
● conducted research within the
rating period;
● others (please specify)
with annotation on how it
contributed to the teaching-
learning process.

Rater Ratee Approving Authority