Gurdaspur District

For Office Use Only

Government of India
Ministry of Water Resources,
River Development & Ganga Rejuvenation
Central Ground Water Board

PLAN ON

ARTIFICIAL RECHARGE TO GROUND WATER AND WATER CONSERVATION IN
OVEREXPLOITED BLOCKS OF GURDASPUR DISTRICT, PUNJAB
Central Ground Water Board

North Western Region
Chandigarh
PLAN OF ARTIFICIAL RECHARGE TO GROUND WATER
IN OVER EXPLOITED BLOCKS, DISTRICT GURDASPUR,
PUNJAB
Gurdaspur district is located in the northern most part of the Punjab state. It shares the boundary
with Jammu & Kashmir state and Himachal Pradesh. The district is bounded by river Ravi and
Beas . It has a unique characteristic of sharing the international boundary with Pakistan and
river
Ravi is separating the district from Pakistan , Hoshiarpur, Kapurthala, Pathankot and Amritsar
are situated on the Eastern , Southern, Northern and Western side of the district respectively .
It covers an area of 3513 km2 and forms a part of upper Bari Doab area. Physiographically the
area is divided into three units (i) Siwalik Hills lying in NE of the district (ii) Kandi Zone lying
immediately south west of foothill zone of Siwalik hills(iii) Alluvial plains lying SW of Kandi.
RAINFALL AND CLIMATE

The normal annual rainfall of the area is 1113mm which is unevenly distributed over Gurdaspur
district. The south western monsoon (July to Sept) contributes about 80% of the rainfall and rest
20% occur during the non monsoon period. The rain fall in the district increases from south west
to north east. The climate of the district is tropical type with four well defined seasons.
GEOMORPHOLOGY AND SOILS
River Ravi, Beas, Chakki Khad and Sakki nala are the main drainage features of the district.
Apart from the above small local nalas and called choes are the frequent features in the northern
side of the district which ultimately in the northern side of the district which ultimately meets the
main khads and aluminates ultimately to the rivers Beas and Ravi. The district can be divided into
three geomorophological types-Hilly area, Piedmont zone and alluvial plain. Hilly area is
predominately on the NE part of the district and called Siwalik which are mainly clays and clay
with boulders.
HYDROGEOLOGY
The main aquifer group of the area is thick granular zones alternate with thick or thin clay lenses.
The fresh aquifer is water table and extends all over the area is composed of coarser sediments .
In the north eastern and northern part , there are 5-6 aquifers within 300m depth and ranges in the
thickness from 20-65 m . These granular zones are laterally extensive in nature and composed of
medium to coarse sands with gravel and pebbles cobbles etc. The clay beds area 5-12 m thick.In
the central part 5-6 prominent granular zones have been encountered within the depth of
375m bgl . The thickness of granular zones is variable from 20-95m and the clay beds vary from
3-14m thick. Water levels of the area in pre monsoon period varies from 2.39 (Khani Khui) to 18-
93 .In the same way the post monsoon water levels are variable from 1.70m (Behrampur) to
16.76(Sri Hargobindpur). It shows that there is extensive recharge by Ravi and Beas during
monsoon.
GROUND WATER RESOURCES

According to the data available for ground water resources on 31.3.2011,. The net ground
water available in the district is 1776.21 MCM and gross draft for all uses is 2263.78MCM hence
the stage of development is 127%. Amongst all the blocks 8 blocks are over exploited.
GROUND WATER QUALITY

The ground water in the district is alkaline in nature with low mineralisation. The pH value
ranges from 7.77 to 8.25 indicating a weak base type characteristic. Specific conductance, a
measure of total dissolved solids present in water, ranges from 235 to 1640micromhos/cm at
250C. The fluoride concentration in the entire district is within the permissible limit of 1.5 mg/L
for drinking water of BIS and it ranges from 0.12 to 1.16 mg/L. Nitrate values are below the
permissible limit with an exception at two villages, i.e. Batala (138 mg/L) and Kalanaur (146
mg/L). Iron, essential for plant and animal growth, is below 1.0 mg/L in the entire district.
Arsenic above the prescribed BIS permissible limit of 0.01 mg/L is found in well waters located
at Nishayra (0.015 mg/L), Behrampur (0.0113 mg/L), Galri (0.0201 mg/L) and Sri Hargobindpur
(0.010 mg/L).
GROUND WATER IRRIGATION SCENARIO
As per the data available from minor irrigation census 2006-07 the detailed number of shallow,
deep, tubewells, lined, unlined water distribution system, land holdings of wells are given below for
reference
Distribution of Shallow Tubewells According to Owner’s Holding Size
No. of shallow tube wells by size class of individual owner
Sr.no district Marginal Small Semi-Medium Medium Big Total
(0-1 ha) (1-2 ha) (2-4 ha) (4-10ha) (>=10 ha)
1 Gurdaspur 6319 17639 36473 19183 2747 82361

Distribution of Deep Tubewells According to Owner’s Holding Size
No. of deep tube wells by size class of individual owner
Sr.no district Marginal Small Semi-Medium Medium Big Total
(0-1 ha) (1-2 ha) (2-4 ha) (4-10ha) (>=10 ha)
1 Gurdaspur 170 309 778 812 313 2382
Distribution of Shallow Tubewells According to Depth of tube well
No. by the depth of shallow Tube well
Sr.no district (0-20 (20-40 (40-60 mts) (60-70 (>70 Total

mts) mts) mts) mts)
1 Gurdaspur 2169 56933 14618 8830 0 82550
Number of Ground Water Schemes and Potential Utilized by water distribution device
Ground Water Schemes according to water Distribution System
Open Water Channel
Sr.no District Lined/pucca Unlined/kutcha Underground pipe
1 Gurdaspur 5979 78500 490
PLAN OF THIS REPORT
In this plan 2 types of the recharge structures are proposed such as Roof Top Rain water harvesting in rural & urban
areas and Recharge pits in agriculture lands of 5mt x 5mt x 3mt size. The pit will be surrounded by angle irons and barbed
fencing. The size and depth depend on the availability of the land. The extra water available on the field will be stored in the pit
and that will also be recharged to the ground water. A summery outline of the artificial recharge plan for the entire district
of each block is given at the beginning in tabular forms. This is followed by the salient features of each block along with
the detailed structure-wise recharge plan and cost estimates.
Details of the block wise type of suitable recharge structures and volume of water assured for annual recharge for each block,
schematic design of recharge structures are annexed at annexure I & II.
This plan is focusing on the technical aspects of the ground water recharge through various means so that various implementing
agencies may get the appropriate technical guidelines. The existing/ongoing schemes of the central or state govt. like
MANERGA, IWSP, PMKVY, NABARD funded schemes, Urban Development schemes, departmentally funded projects etc.
may be benefitted from the recharge plan by incorporating the input in the operational guidelines/ design and for locating the
specific sites.
Agriculture university, engineering Collages, Academic and Research Institution, NGO may also take up the pilot or
demonstrative projects in the blocks suitable to them to plan at local level as per local conditions.
Sr.no. Type of Structure No. of structures Unit cost Total cost of Annual
in Lakhs structure in Crores Recharge
(MCM)
ROOF TOP RAIN WATER HARVESTING IN RURAL AND URBEN
AREAS
1 Artificial Recharge Plan For 6663 0.25 16.66
0.868
Urban Areas.
2 Roof Top Rain Water 17646 0.25 1.697
44.12
Harvesting in Rural Areas
Total 24309 0.25 60.78 2.565
ARTIFICIAL RECHARGE IN FARMS

1 Artificial Recharge Plan 19331 0.35 67.65 22.965
Through Recharge Pits.
Total 67.65 22.965
By the implementation of the proposed recharge structures there will be a reduction of 0.99% in stage of
ground water development as tabulated below
Sr. Total Draft Recharge through Draft Reduced Stage of Stage of Reduction in
no. (present) different due development development stage of
(MCM) proposed to Recharge (present) after development
structures (MCM) recharge after recharge
(MCM)
1 2263.78 25.53 2238.25 127% 126.01% 0.99%
ARTIFICIAL RCEHARGE PLAN THROUGH RECHARGE PITS IN OVER EXPLOITED
BLOCKS OF GURDASPUR DISTRICT
of recharge pits
15%*Rainfall )
@Rs.0.35 lakh
farm recharge
area taken for
(Area*Runoff
Total number
10%of village
(in hectares )
Total area of
(in hectares)
Cost of Pit
the village
(MCM)=
recharge
(Crores)
Annual
Block Name
Kahnuwan 3267 3267 4.322 11.43

32669
8.02
Dhariwal 22898 2290 2290 2.782
6.88
Kalanour 19665 1967 1967 2.321
Dera Baba Nanak 2795 2795 2.914 9.78

27951
Fatehgarh 7.90
22564 2256 2256 2.335
Churian
Batala 2182 2182 2.521 7.64
21824
Qadian 2000 2000 2.658 7.00

19998
Sri Hargobindpur 2574 2574 3.112 9.01

25673
19331 22.965 67.66
Number of Recharge pits are based on following factors:

Availability of Irrigation wells In the farmer land
Area of sandy strata at shallow depth identified
Type of structure will be recharge pit/ Recharge well( where top three meters is clay)
ROOF TOP RAINWATER HARVESTING IN RURAL AREAS OF GURDASPUR
DISTRICT OF PUNJAB
No of Houses taken for Artificial
Total No of AR Structures ( one

structure for each house )
Number of households (2011
Total recharge in MCM

Recharge ( 10% of total
Total area of the village ( in
households)
Cost @ 0.25
Name of CD Block
Name of District
Lacs/structure
(Crores)
hectares )
Sr.n
census)
GURDASPUR 1 6.23
Kahnuwan 32669 24921 2492 2492 0.264
2 6.59
Dhariwal 22898 26340 2634 2634 0.279
3 3.74
Kalanaur 19665 14942 1494 1494 0.141
4 Dera Baba 5.31
27951 21241 2124 2124 0.177
Nanak
5 Fatehgarh- 5.53
22564 22129 2213 2213 0.183
Churian
6 6.72
Batala 21824 26866 2687 2687 0.248
7 4.50
Qadian 19998 17981 1798 1798 0.191
8 Sri 5.51
25673 22039 2204 2204 0.214
Harigovindpur
Total 44.12
193242 176459 17646 17646 1.697
ARTIFICIAL RECHARGE PLAN FOR URBAN AREAS OF DISTRICT GURDASPUR PUNJAB
District Block Town Name Total Total Total Vol of
Houshold
Househo Populati Roof Top water
s taken
lds on of Area availabl Cost @Rs.0.25
for
Town (sqm) e for lakh/Structure
Atificial
recharg (Crores)
Recharge
e
(10%)
(MCM)
Gurdaspur(MCI+O
15443 81448 1544 308860 0.225 3.86
Gurdaspur Gurdaspur
G)
0.87
GURDASPUR Dhariwal (M Cl) 3482 16772 348 69640 0.051
0.27
GURDASPUR Behrampur (CT) 1057 5432 106 21140 0.015
0.18
GURDASPUR Baryar (CT) 706 3520 71 14120 0.010
2094 11845 209 41880 0.030 0.52

GURDASPUR Tibri (CT)
1499 7721 150 29980 0.018 0.38

GURDASPUR Fateh nangal
Fatehgarh Churian
2550 13070 255 51000 0.031 0.64
BATALA
(MCI)
31396 158621 3140 627920 0.387 7.85
BATALA Batala(MCl+ OG)
4823 2362 482 96460 0.059 1.21

BATALA Qadian (MCl+ OG)
Sri Hargobindpur 0.40

BATALA 1587 8241 159 31740 0.020
(M Cl)
DERA BABA Dera Baba Nanak 0.33

1298 6394 130 25960 0.014
NANAK (M Cl)
DERA BABA
692 4001 69 13840 0.007 0.17
Shikar (CT)
NANAK
6663 16.658
TOTAL 66627 319427 1332540 0.868
B. POTENTIAL FOR REDUCTION IN OVERDRAFT BY ENHANCING THE GROUND WATER
USE EFFICIENCY OF IRRIGATION TUBE WELLS
The micro level transformation in the ground water management have vast impact potential to counter extensive ground
water depletion faced by the state of Punjab, particularly in overexploited blocks. There are around 84932 operated by
farmers for irrigation through unlined/Kutcha (92.32%) open channel system in Gurdaspur district where water from the
tubewell is discharge to the agricultural field. In this process huge quantity of ground water is wasted in soil moisture and
evaporation losses.
Dynamic ground water resources (2011) indicate that Gross ground water draft for irrigation in Gurdaspur district is
estimated at 2197.41MCM. It is expected that around 26.52 % of over draft can be brought down by switching over to
underground/surface pipeline based distribution from the prevailing unlined open channels. Thereby gross draft will be
reduced to the tune of 1784.77 MCM assuming there is no crop diversification by the farmers.
The benefit will lead to saving of precious ground water resources in overexploited blocks of Gurdaspur Districts. The
measure if implemented will bring down the ground water overdraft from 127% to 100.48 %. The category of the blocks
will also improve drastically resulting in boosting of agriculture and industrial development otherwise not sustainable in
majority of the blocks in the state.
The tubewells also consume enormous electricity which is subsidized and government incurs significant revenue on this
account. The measures therefore will result in saving of energy and money. Pollution impact will be reduced whenever
diesel engines are used by the farmers. The environmental and ecological condition in the irrigated land will improve.
Unwanted weed growth will also be controlled inside the farm land. This will also be useful in the waterlogged/ shallow
water table areas as the seepage losses in these areas also aggravate the water logging. Government should make/launch
a mission mode program for installing the underground pipe lines instead of having katcha channel in the entire
Punjab. Heavy ground water overdraft can be reduced by these efforts. This will ensure more crop per drop.
POTENTIAL FOR REDUCTION IN OVERDRAFT BY ENHANCING THE GROUND WATER USE EFFICIENCY IN
IRRIGATION TUBEWELLS, GURDASPUR DISTRICT
Net Total Gross Gross Percentage Wastage Wastage Potential of Gross draft Present Stage of Reduction in
Annual Draft Irrigation Ground of unlined through through Reduced after saving of Stage of development stage of
Ground (present) Draft Water channel unlined unlined irrigation water (mcm) Development afterwards(( development
Water (mcm) (present) Draft for channel, channel in overdraft (Col 8+Col4) (%) Col 9/Col after
Availabili (mcm) Domesti (mcm) irrigated area (Col3-col7) 1)X100) constructing
ty (mcm) c and (Col 3 X by ground (mcm) (%) pucca canal
industri Col5 X water scheme (Col 11-Col
al supply 0.30#) in OE blocks 10) (%)
(mcm) only
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1776.21 2263.78 2197.41 66.37 92.32 608.59 478.61 1718.80 1784.77 127 100.48 26.52
# Losses from open kutcha channel are around 30%.

COST ESTIMATE OF UNDERGROUND PIPE LINE
District Block Irrigated area Percentage Area under unlined Total cost Total Cost in
by ground of Unlined Channels @Rs.0.50 lack per Rs.Cr. District
water scheme Channel (%) hector(in cr) wise
(ha) Area *0.50/100 =
Crores
Kahnuwan 19780 92.32 18261 91.30

Dhariwal 13148 92.32 12138 60.69
Kalanaur 12942 92.32 11948 59.74
Dera Baba Nanak 18018 92.32 16634 83.17
GURDASPUR 526.46
Fatehgarh-Churian 12704 92.32 11728 58.64
Batala 13846 92.32 12783 63.91
Qadian 10608 92.32 9793 48.97
Sri Harigobindpur 13006 92.32 12007 60.04
BLOCK
WISE PLAN OF
DISTRICT
GURDASPUR
PUNJAB
(8 OE BLOCKS)
Block Name:- Batala
District:- Gurdaspur State:- PUNJAB
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
`
i) Geographical area (sq km) 278.3
 Number of Villages inhabited 130

 Un-inhabited 0
ii)Average Annual Rainfall (mm) 779
iii) Area feasible for Artificial Recharge 278.3
iv) Village identified under scarcity of 51

Water
v) Village covered under water supply 26
vi) Water Tank exists in the village 16
2. GEOMORPHOLOGY
Major Physiographic Alluvium Plain
Major drainages
Basin Ravi 40%
Sub-Basin Beas 60%
3. LAND USE
 Area According to Village Papers 237.92

(Sq.Km)
 Net Area Sown (Sq.Km) 197.59
 Area Sown More than Once (Sq.Km) 184.00
 Total Cropped Area (Sq.Km) 381.59
 Cropping Intensity 193
 Area under Thur and Sem (Sq.Km) --
4. PREDOMINAT GEOLOGICAL Recent alluvium
FORMATIONS
5. HYDROGEOLOGY
Major Water bearing Formation (Aquifer) Fine to coarse Sand
Avg. Depth to water level (decadal) Depth to water level

May 2015 (mbgl)
 Pre- monsoon: (May 2015) 5.00 – 20.00(mbgl)
 6.30-9.10 (mbgl)
 Post –monsoon: (Nov2014)
 4.32-9.40(mbgl)
6. GROUND WATER EXPLORATION BY
CGWB (As on 31.03.2015)
 No of wells drilled 1
 Depth Range (m) 83.80-375.30
 Discharge (Ipm) 973-4300
Aquifer Parameters
 Transmissivity (m2/day) 142-4300
 Storativity 1.0*10-3 to 4.03*10-3
 Specified yield 0.072
7. GROUND WATER QUALITY Min Max
 EC in µS/cm at 25 c 0
790 790
 NO3 (mg/l) 90 90
 F (mg/l) 0.31 0.31
 As (mg/l) 0.0028 0.0028
8. DYANMIC GROUND WATER 2011
RESOURCES in MCM
 Net Ground Water Availability 171.40
(MCM)
 Existing Gross Ground Water Draft 256.79
for Irrigation (MCM)
for Domestic and Industrial Water
Supply (MCM)
for all Uses (MCM)
 Allocation for Domestic and 13.62
Industrial Requirement Supply up
to next 25 years (MCM)
 Net Ground Water Availability for -99.19
Future Irrigation Development
(MCM)
 Stage of Ground Water Development 156
/ Over Draft (%)
 Category of Block OE
Any specific reasons for high stress on Extensive Extensiv
ground water leading to Overexploitation Irrigation e Irrigation
and decline in ground water level
9. Percentage of sand thickness up to 50 m Thickness(m) Percentage

depth (Average) 28 % 56
10 Volume of unsaturated zone available 167.49

for recharge (MCM)
11. Volume of water required for recharge 222.72

(MCM)
12. Volume of surplus water available for 27.97

recharge (MCM)
RECHARGE/ CONSERVATION Total
Total Cost
STRUCTURES Number of
(Rs. in Total Recharge in mcm
Recharge
crores)
Structures
13 Farm Recharge @Rs. 2182 7.637 2.521

35000/-
14 RWH Rural @ Rs. 2687 6.717 0.248

25000/-
15 RWH Urban @ Rs. 3622 9.055 0.446

25000/-
16 Underground pipe 12783 63.91 70.43

line (area in hectares)
@ Rs. 50000/-
TOTAL
87.319 73.645
Ground Water Scenario of Block
Block Name:- Fatehgarh Churian

` i) Geographical area (sq km) 213.3

 Un-inhabited 0
ii) Average Annual Rainfall (mm) 700
iii)Area feasible for Artificial Recharge 213.3

Water
v)Village covered under water supply 26
2. GEOMORPHOLOGY
Major drainages
Basin Ravi 100%
Sub-Basin
3. LAND USE
(Sq.Km)
FORMATIONS
5. HYDROGEOLOGY

May 2015(mbgl)
 6.10-9.56 (mbgl)
 6.30-9.66(mbgl)
CGWB
(As on 31.03.2015)
 No of wells drilled --
 Depth Range (m) 83.80-375.30
Aquifer Parameters
 Storativity 1.0*10-3 to 4.03*10-3
 EC in µS/cm at 250c 522 704
 NO3 (mg/l) 18 42
 F (mg/l) 0.31 0.18
 As (mg/l) 0.0006 0.0006
RESOURCES in MCM
 Net Ground Water Availability (MCM) 129.37
 Existing Gross Ground Water Draft for 247.74

Irrigation (MCM)
Domestic and Industrial Water
Supply (MCM)
all Uses (MCM)
 Allocation for Domestic and Industrial 5.51
Requirement Supply up to next 25
years (MCM)
(MCM)
 Stage of Ground Water Development / 195
Over Draft(%)
ground water leading to Overexploitation Irrigation e
and decline in ground water level Irrigation
depth (Average) 30 % 60
10 Volume of unsaturated zone available for

recharge (MCM) ---
11. Volume of water required for recharge ---
(MCM)
12. Volume of surplus water available for ---
recharge(MCM)
Total Cost
Recharge
crores)
Structures
13 Farm Recharge @Rs. 2256 7.896 2.335
35000/-
14 RWH Rural @ Rs. 2213 5.532 0.183
25000/-
15 RWH Urban@ Rs. 255 0.637 0.031
25000/-

@ Rs. 50000/-
TOTAL
72.705 70.449
Block Name:- Kahnuwan


 Un-inhabited 6
iii)Area feasible for Artificial Recharge 259

Water
2. GEOMORPHOLOGY
Major drainages
Basin
Sub-Basin Satluj 100%
3. LAND USE
(Sq.Km)
FORMATIONS
5. HYDROGEOLOGY

May 2015 (mbgl)

 3.04-7.60 (mbgl)
 3.70-8.00(mbgl)
1CGWB
a(As on 31.03.2015)
 Depth Range (m) 83.80-375.30
Aquifer Parameters
 Storativity 1.0*10-3 to 4.03*10-3
 EC in µS/cm at 250c -- --
 NO3 (mg/l) -- --
 F (mg/l) -- --
 As (mg/l) -- --
RESOURCES in MCM

Irrigation (MCM)
Supply (MCM)
all Uses (MCM)
years (MCM)
(MCM)
Over Draft(%)

depth (Average) -- % --
10 Volume of unsaturated zone available for 194.81

recharge (MCM)
(MCM)
recharge(MCM)
Total Cost
Recharge
crores)
Structures
13 Farm Recharge 3267 7.637 4.322
@Rs. 35000/-
14 RWH Rural @ Rs. 2492 6.717 0.264
25000/-
15 RWH Urban@ Rs. - - -
25000/-

@ Rs. 50000/-
TOTAL
78.264 74.376
Block Name:- Kalanaur

1GENERAL INFORMATION
1. i) Geographical area (sq km) 226.4
`
 Un-inhabited 8

Water
2. GEOMORPHOLOGY
Major drainages
Basin
Sub-Basin Ravi 100%
3. LAND USE
(Sq.Km)
FORMATIONS
5. HYDROGEOLOGY
May 2015(mbgl)
 Pre- monsoon: (May 2015) 2.00 – 10.00 (mbgl)
 3.04- 11.79 (mbgl)
 Post – monsoon: (Nov2014)
 3.80 – 11.09 (mbgl)
1CGWB
a(As on 31.03.2015)
 Depth Range (m) 83.80-375.30
Aquifer Parameters
 Storativity 1.0*10-3 to 4.03*10-3
 EC in µS/cm at 250c 269 568
 NO3 (mg/l) 0.5 1.7
 F (mg/l) 0.2 0.25
 As (mg/l) 0.003 0.003
RESOURCES in MCM
(MCM)
Supply (MCM)
for all Uses (MCM)
years (MCM)
(MCM)
Over Draft (%)

10 Volume of unsaturated zone available

for recharge (MCM) --
11. Volume of water required for recharge --

(MCM)
12. Volume of surplus water available for --

recharge(MCM)

Total Cost
Recharge
crores)
Structures
13 Farm Recharge 1967 6.884 2.321

@Rs. 35000/-
14 RWH Rural @ Rs. 1494 3.735 0.141

25000/-

25000/-

@ Rs. 50000/-
TOTAL
74.534 50.522
Ground Water Scenario of the Block
Block Name:- Qadian

 Un-inhabited 0

Water
2. GEOMORPHOLOGY
Major drainages
Basin
Sub-Basin Beas 100%
3. LAND USE
(Sq.Km)
FORMATIONS
5. HYDROGEOLOGY
May 2015 (mbgl)
 9.00-19.51 (mbgl)
 9.50-19.44(mbgl)
CGWB(As on 31.03.2015)
 Depth Range (m) 83.80-375.30
Aquifer Parameters
 Storativity 1.0*10-3 to 4.03*10-3
 EC in µS/cm at 250c 522 704
 NO3 (mg/l) 18 42
 F (mg/l) 0.31 0.18
 As (mg/l) 0.0006 0.006
RESOURCES in MCM
(MCM)
Supply (MCM)
for all Uses (MCM)
years (MCM)
(MCM)
Over Draft(%)

for recharge (MCM) 108.69
(MCM)
recharge(MCM)
Total Cost
Recharge
crores)
Structures
13 Farm Recharge @Rs. 2000 7.637 2.658

35000/-
14 RWH Rural @ Rs. 1798 6.717 0.191

25000/-

25000/-

@ Rs. 50000/-
TOTAL
78.264 44.829
Block Name:- Sri Hargobindpur


 Un-inhabited 1

Water
2. GEOMORPHOLOGY
Major drainages
Basin
Sub-Basin Beas100%
3. LAND USE
(Sq.Km)
FORMATIONS
5. HYDROGEOLOGY

May 2015 (mbgl)
 4.50-15.65 (mbgl)
 4.50-15.65 (mbgl)
CGWB
(As on 31.03.2015)
 Depth Range (m) 83.80-375.30
Aquifer Parameters
 Storativity 1.0*10-3 to 4.03*10-3
 EC in µS/cm at 250c 327 420
 NO3 (mg/l) 7.6 13
 F (mg/l) 0.07 0.46
 As (mg/l) 0.001 0.01
RESOURCES in MCM
(MCM)
Irrigation (MCM)
Supply (MCM)
all Uses (MCM)
years (MCM)
(MCM)
Over Draft(%)

recharge (MCM) 170.50
(MCM)

recharge(MCM)

Total Cost
Recharge
crores)
Structures
13 Farm Recharge @Rs. 2574 9.009 3.112
35000/-
14 RWH Rural @ Rs. 2204 5.51 0.214
25000/-
15 RWH Urban@ Rs. 159 0.3975 0.020
25000/-

@ Rs. 50000/-
TOTAL
74.951 51.736
Block Name:- Dera Baba Nanak


 Un-inhabited 6

Water
2. GEOMORPHOLOGY
Major drainages
Basin
Sub-Basin Ravi100%
3. LAND USE
(Sq.Km)
FORMATIONS
5. HYDROGEOLOGY
Avg. Depth to water level (decadal)
 Pre- monsoon: (May 2015) 2.00-10.00(mbgl)

CGWB(As on 31.03.2015)
 Depth Range (m) 83.80-375.30
Aquifer Parameters
 Storativity 1.0*10-3 to 4.03*10-
3

 EC in µS/cm at 250c 481 --
 NO3 (mg/l) -- --
 F (mg/l) -- 0.84
 As (mg/l) 0.0013 0.0017
RESOURCES in MCM
(MCM)
Supply (MCM)
for all Uses (MCM)
 Allocation for Domestic and 2.91
Industrial Requirement Supply up
to next 25 years (MCM)
 Net Ground Water Availability for - 34.58
(MCM)
 Stage of Ground Water Development 128
/ Over Draft (%)

depth (Average) 26.5 % 53

for recharge (MCM) 177.24
(MCM)
recharge(MCM)
Total Cost
Recharge
crores)
Structures
13 Farm Recharge @Rs.
2795 9.783 2.914
35000/-
14 RWH Rural @ Rs.
25000/- 2124 5.310 0.177
15 RWH Urban@ Rs.

25000/- 130 0.325 0.007
16 Underground pipe
line (area in hectares) 16634 83.170 67.77
@ Rs. 50000/-
TOTAL
98.588
70.868
Block Name:- Dhariwal

1GENERAL INFORMATION
.
`
i) Geographical area (sq km) 256.8

 Un-inhabited 0

Water
2. GEOMORPHOLOGY
Major drainages
Basin Ravi 60%
Sub-Basin Beas 40%
3. LAND USE
 Area According to Village Papers (Sq.Km) 201.73
FORMATIONS
5. HYDROGEOLOGY
May 2015 (mbgl)
 4.30-11.80 (mbgl)
 2.90-26.90(mbgl)
CGWB(As on 31.03.2015)
 Depth Range (m) 83.80-375.30
Aquifer Parameters
 Storativity 1.0*10-3 to 4.03*10-3
 EC in µS/cm at 250c 345 403
 NO3 (mg/l) 1.4 15
 F (mg/l) 0.17 0.27
 As (mg/l) 0.0014 0.015
RESOURCES in MCM

Irrigation (MCM)
Domestic and Industrial Water Supply
(MCM)
all Uses (MCM)
years (MCM)
 Net Ground Water Availability for Future 53.85
Irrigation Development (MCM)
Over Draft (%)
depth (Average) 30.5 % 61

recharge (MCM) 154.55

(MCM)

recharge(MCM)

Total Cost
Recharge
crores)
Structures
13 Farm Recharge @Rs. 2290 8.015 2.782
35000/-
14 RWH Rural @ Rs. 2634 6.585 0.279
25000/-
15 RWH Urban@ Rs. 348 0.870 0.051
25000/-

@ Rs. 50000/-
TOTAL 76.160
67.402
Annexure-I
Annexure-II

Gurdaspur District

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Gurdaspur District

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Gurdaspur District

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

For Office Use Only

ARTIFICIAL RECHARGE TO GROUND WATER AND WATER CONSERVATION IN

OVEREXPLOITED BLOCKS OF GURDASPUR DISTRICT, PUNJAB

Central Ground Water Board

RAINFALL AND CLIMATE

GROUND WATER RESOURCES

GROUND WATER QUALITY

GROUND WATER IRRIGATION SCENARIO

Distribution of Shallow Tubewells According to Owner’s Holding Size

No. of shallow tube wells by size class of individual owner

Sr.no district Marginal Small Semi-Medium Medium Big Total

(0-1 ha) (1-2 ha) (2-4 ha) (4-10ha) (>=10 ha)

1 Gurdaspur 6319 17639 36473 19183 2747 82361

No. of deep tube wells by size class of individual owner

Sr.no district Marginal Small Semi-Medium Medium Big Total

(0-1 ha) (1-2 ha) (2-4 ha) (4-10ha) (>=10 ha)

1 Gurdaspur 170 309 778 812 313 2382

Distribution of Shallow Tubewells According to Depth of tube well

No. by the depth of shallow Tube well

Sr.no district (0-20 (20-40 (40-60 mts) (60-70 (>70 Total

1 Gurdaspur 2169 56933 14618 8830 0 82550

Ground Water Schemes according to water Distribution System

Open Water Channel

Sr.no District Lined/pucca Unlined/kutcha Underground pipe

1 Gurdaspur 5979 78500 490

PLAN OF THIS REPORT

ARTIFICIAL RECHARGE IN FARMS

Total 67.65 22.965

Kahnuwan 3267 3267 4.322 11.43

Dera Baba Nanak 2795 2795 2.914 9.78

Qadian 2000 2000 2.658 7.00

Sri Hargobindpur 2574 2574 3.112 9.01

19331 22.965 67.66

Number of Recharge pits are based on following factors:

No of Houses taken for Artificial

Total No of AR Structures ( one

Total recharge in MCM

2094 11845 209 41880 0.030 0.52

1499 7721 150 29980 0.018 0.38

4823 2362 482 96460 0.059 1.21

Sri Hargobindpur 0.40

DERA BABA Dera Baba Nanak 0.33

# Losses from open kutcha channel are around 30%.

Kahnuwan 19780 92.32 18261 91.30

i) Geographical area (sq km) 278.3

 Number of Villages inhabited 130

ii)Average Annual Rainfall (mm) 779

iii) Area feasible for Artificial Recharge 278.3

iv) Village identified under scarcity of 51

vi) Water Tank exists in the village 16

Major Physiographic Alluvium Plain

 Area According to Village Papers 237.92

Avg. Depth to water level (decadal) Depth to water level

9. Percentage of sand thickness up to 50 m Thickness(m) Percentage

10 Volume of unsaturated zone available 167.49

11. Volume of water required for recharge 222.72

12. Volume of surplus water available for 27.97

13 Farm Recharge @Rs. 2182 7.637 2.521

14 RWH Rural @ Rs. 2687 6.717 0.248