‘,-

31epubtir of the Vhitippitteo

apartment of eintration
NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF MUNTINLUPA CITY

Office of the Schools Division

Superintendent

JUL 1 3 2021
MEMORANDUM
No. 185 , s. 2021

TIMELINE OF ACTIVITIES FOR THE CONDUCT OF

CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH (CAR) FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2021-2022

TO: OIC-Assistant Schools Division Superintendent

Chief Education Supervisor, Curriculum Implementation Division
Chief Education Supervisor, School Governance and Operations Division
Public Elementary and Secondary School Heads/OICs
All Others Concerned

1. In conformity with DepEd Order No. 26, s. 2021 titled, "Amendment to DepEd
Order No. 016, s. 2017 (Research Management Guidelines)", dated June 21, 2021,
the Timeline of Activities for the Conduct of Classroom Action Research (CAR) for
School Year 2021-2022 is issued to provide guidance in the management of research
initiatives and activities.

2. The School Research Committee (SRC) should perform the following roles and
responsibilities:
a. provide directions on school research initiatives;
b. evaluate and approve research proposals and other related school research
initiatives to be funded under the Basic Education Research Fund (SERF)
and other fund sources; and
c. prepare and submit reports to the Schools Division Research Committee
(SDRC) every 5th day of the following month.

3. Strict implementation of the deadline will be enforced relative to the

preparation of the Educational Research Assistance (ERA) Obligation Request (OBR)
and Disbursement Voucher (DV). Schools that cannot meet the deadline will not be
included in the OBR and DV for the month.

5. Schools that were not included in the OBR and DV may receive their ERA in
December if there are still available funds under the Research, Exploration and
Development Expenses (REDE).

6. Attached with this Memorandum are the following enclosures, for reference:
a. Timeline of Activities for the Conduct of Classroom Action Research (CAR)
School Year 2021-2022
b. Checklist for the Educational Research Assistance (ERA) Proposal
c. ERA Application Form
d. Declaration of Anti-Plagiarism and Absence of Conflict of Interest
e. Action Research Proposal Template
f. Scoring Checklist for Appraising Action Research Proposal

Student Center for Life Skills Bldg., Centennial Ave, Brgy Tunasan,
Muntinlupa City
k. (02) 805-9935, (02) 805 - 9940 FA
No: 18.1519.026

p2 [email protected]
3epubtit of the initippineo
citiarttnent of eburation
NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF MUNTINLUPA CITY

g. CAR-ME Form Nos. 1-6

h. Typesetting the Full Paper for Action Research
i. Narrative Report on School-Based Conference
j. Classroom Action Research: Self-Evaluation Checklist.

7. Queries and concerns relative to the CAR may be directed to Ms. Phoebe R.
Arroyo, Senior Education Program Specialist - Planning and Research Division at
805-99-35 to 38, local 120.

8. Immediate and wide dissemination of, and strict compliance with this
Memorandum is directed.

DOMINI C. IDANAN CESO V

Scrs ision Superintende7t

Encl.: As stated
References: As stated
be indicated in the Perpetual Index
Under the following subjects

RESEARCH SCHOOLS

REPORTS FUNDS

PRA /Timeline of Activities for Conducting Classroom Action Research (CAR) School Year 2021-22
185 /July 8, 2021

at Student Center for Life Skills Bldg., Centennial Ave, Brgy Tunasan,
l
Muntinlupa City
ISO 9001' 2015
(02) 805-9935, (02) 805 - 9940 o: 18.1519.026

8 [email protected]
Department of Education
National Capital Region
DIVISION OF CITY SCHOOLS
City of Muntinlupa

TIMELINE OF ACTIVITIES FOR THE CONDUCT OF

CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH (CAR)
SCHOOL YEAR 2021- 2022

Date Activity Report

Conceptualization and submission of the Compilation of CAR-ME No. 1 —
August 2021 proposed CAR titles to the School Research Checklist For Evaluating Classroom
Committee (SRC) who will consequently Action Research (CAR) Title
approve/disapprove the title • Compilation of the CAR Titles

September 2021 Presentation of the ERA proposal to the School Compilation of Approved ERA Proposal
Research Committee (SRC) who will consequently • Compilation of Scoring Checklist for
approve/disapprove the proposal Appraising Action Research Proposals

Conduct of the Pre-Division Research Conference

(SY 2020-2021)
Conduct of the 6th Division Research Conference
Selection of the participants/respondents
October 2021 Preparation of the Parent Information and Compilation of Parent Information and
Informed Consent Form Informed Consent Form
• Monitoring Report of the SRC
Conduct of the 6th Division Research Parliament
• Monitoring report of the SRC
Development of Data Gathering Tools/Research CAR ME No. 2 —Summary Report on
November 2021 Instruments Monitoring and Evaluating Classroom
Action Research Progress
Publication of CAR Journal SY 2020-2021 (Methodology)
• Monitoring report of the SRC CAR ME
December 2021 Implementation /Conduct of the Study No. 3 —Summary Report on Monitoring
and Evaluating Classroom Action
Research Progress (Conduct of the
Study)
• Monitoring report of the SRC: CAR ME
January 2022 Implementation/Conduct of the Study No. 3 —Summary Report on Monitoring
and Evaluating Classroom Action
Research Progress (Conduct of the
Study)
Monitoring report of the SRC: CAR ME
February 2022 Data Processing and Analysis No. 4 —Summary Report on Monitoring
and Evaluating Classroom Action
Research Progress (Data Processing
and Analysis)

Monitoring report of the SRC: CAR ME

March 2022 Interpretation and Presentation of Data No. 5 —Summary Report on Monitoring
and Evaluating Classroom Action
Research Progress (Interpretation and
Presentation of Data)
Date Activity Report
• Monitoring report of the SRC: CAR-ME
April 2022 Formulation of Conclusion and Recommendation Form No. 6— Summary Report on
Monitoring and Evaluating Classroom
Action Research Progress (Conclusion
and Recommendation)
Finalization of Full Paper Compilation of Full Paper
May 2022
Conduct of School-Based Conference Narrative Report/Write-up
Revision of Full Paper • Compilation of Revised Full Paper
June 2022
Conduct of Pre-Division Research Conference
(SY 2021-2022)
Conduct of 7th Division Research Conference

July 2022 Self-Evaluation of the Researcher Monitoring Report of the SRC: CAR-ME
Form No. 6 —Classroom Action
Research: Self-Evaluation Checklist
Publication of CAR Journal SY 2021-2022

Prepared by:

PHO BE R. ARROYO ZOREN P ITO L. GUBALANE DPA MA. REGAELE A. OLARTE

SEP , Planning & Research SEPS, Monitoring & Evaluation EPS, SGOD

A D. BAUTISTA EdD
EMELIfrt—t VALENTINA A. BALLESTEROS EdD GINA U. URQUIA PhD
EPS, Mathematics EPS, TLE-EPP EPS, LRDMS

CLAilSA C. AVILA SUSAN M. LABUNTOG

PSDS Division Accountant II

ADELINE ANN L. DIAZ NERISSA COMEDA PhD

Chi• f Education Supervisor, Chief Edu tion Supervisor, SGOD
01C-Assistant Schools Division Superintendent

Noted:

fie
*1 9
DOMINICO . IDANAN CESO V
Schools Division Superintendent
Enclosure No. 2

CHECKLIST FOR THE ERA PROPOSAL

TITLE:

Name of Lead Proponent: Mobile NO:

School:

Division: E-mail Add:

Date of Submission to the SDO:

Instructions:
Put a check mark (✓) if you have complied (C), not Complied (NC) and not Applicable
(N/A).

No. Document C NC N/A Remarks

1 Research Application Form
2 Basic/ Action Research Proposal
Template (10 -12 pages)
3 Declaration of Absence of Anti-
Plagiarism
4 Declaration of Absence of Conflict of
Interest

Researcher
(Signature Over Printed Name)

Reviewed by:

School Research Committee/ Focal Person

(Signature Over Printed Name)
Enclosure No. 3

EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSISTANCE (ERA) APPLICATION FORM

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:

• Fill up the information requested completely.

• Use A4 size of bond paper.

A. RESEARCH INFORMATION

RESEARCH TITLE

SHORT DESCRIPTION OF THE RESEARCH (150 words only)

RESEARCH CATEGORY iTHEME OF THE RESEARCH

(choose only one) (choose only one main research theme)

❑ National ❑Teaching and Learning

ORegion ❑ Child Protection
❑ Schools Division ❑ Human Resource Development
ODistrict ❑Governance
❑ School
(choose only one cross-cutting theme, if applicable)
(choose only one)
❑Disaster Risk Reduction Management
O Action Research ❑ Gender and Development
❑ Basic Research ❑Inclusive Education

FUND SOURCE
qe.g. BERF, SEF, others)
*indicate also if proponent will use personal funds
B. PROPONENT INFORMATION

PROPONENT
LAST NAME: FIRST NAME: MIDDLE NAME:

BIRTHDAY: SEX: POSITION / DESIGNATION:

SCHOOL PRINCIPAL

DIVISON SCHOOL SCHOOL/OFFICE ADDRESS

MUNTINLUPA CITY

CONTACT NUMBER/S: EMAIL ADDRESS (preferably

DepEd email):

EDUCATIONAL THESIS TITLE / RELATED RESEARCH

DEGREE TITLE/COURSE
ATTAINMENT PROJECT

SIGNATURE OF PROPONENT:

IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR'S CONFORME

I hereby endorse the attached research proposal. I certify that the proponent/s
has/have the capacity to implement a research study without compromising his/her
office functions.

Name and Signature of Immediate Supervisor

Position / Designation

Date
Enclosure No. 4

DECLARATION OF ABSENCE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

I , understand that conflict of interest refers to

situations in which financial or other personal considerations may compromise
my judgment in evaluating, conducting, or reporting research.

2. I hereby declare that I do not have any personal conflict of interest that may
arise from my application and submission of my research proposal. I
understand that my research proposal may be returned to me if found out that
there is conflict of interest during the initial screening as per DO 16, s. 2017.

3. Further, in case of any form of conflict of interest (possible or actual) which may
inadvertently emerge during the conduct of my research, I will duly report it to
the research committee for immediate action.

4. I understand that I may be held accountable by the Department of Education

for any conflict of interest which I have intentionally concealed.

Name and Signature of Proponent

Date
Enclosure No. 5

DECLARATION OF ANTI-PLAGIARISM AND ABSENCE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

1. l„ understand that plagiarism is the act of taking and using another's ideas and
works and passing them off as one's own. This includes explicitly copying the
whole work of another person or that of the undersigned proponents and/or
using some parts of their work without proper acknowledgment and
referencing.

2. I hereby attest to the originality of this research proposal and has cited properly
all the references used. I/We further commit that all deliverables and the final
research study emanating from this proposal shall be of original content. I/We
shall use appropriate citations in referencing other works from various sources.
I/We also hereby attest that this research has not yet been finished and is not
part of the proponent's' thesis/dissertation.

3. I understand that violation from this declaration and commitment shall be

subject to consequences and shall be dealt with accordingly by the
Department of Education.

Name and Signature of Lead Proponent

Click or tap to enter a date.
Date
Enclosure No. 6

ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSAL

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS (read me):

• Fill up the information requested completely.

• Research parts are indicated with description to serve as a guide. Please
delete all the highlighted (with gray color) part once you are done filling
up the template.
• Use A4 size bond paper for hard and soft copy.
ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSAL

PROPONENT

TITLE OF
RESEARCH

TYPE OF ❑ ACTION RESEARCH

RESEARCH ❑ BASIC RESEARCH
DIVISION

CONTEXT AND RATIONALE

• Description and context of the study

• Reason for conducting the study
• How the results could be used in action planning

ACTION RESEARCH QUESTIONS

• Identify the problem/ s which will be addressed by the research

PROPOSED INNOVATION, INTERVENTION AND STRATEGY

• Idea
• Problem
• Procedure/ system
• Solution
• Phenomenon
• Combination of any of these that were used to solve the research problem

ACTION RESEARCH METHODS

A. Participants and/or other Sources of Data and Information

• Who will participate in the research

• Number of people
• Characteristics of the participants/ sample
• Sampling procedure
B. Data Gathering Methods

• Various instruments
• Procedures for data collection

C. Data Analysis Plan

• How the data will be analyzed and reported

• Qualitative and/or quantitative methods used in analyzing the data

PLANS FOR DISSEMINATION AND UTILIZATION

DISSEMINATION
Month Month Month Month Month Mont
ACTIVITIES
1 2 3 4 5 h6
add rows if necessary
1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

REFERENCES

*Please follow the APA format

Submitted by:

Proponent
(Signature above Printed Name)
Enclosure No. 7

SCORING CHECKLIST FOR APPRAISING ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSALS

General Instructions:
• Fill up the information requested completely.
• Rate the research paper based on the criteria and write your comments
or suggestions if you have any.

Research Title:
School:
Proponent:

Increasing Levels of Quality and their Descriptions

Main low ► high Comments or
Score
Criteria Suggestions
Sub-Criteria
The action The educational The nature, extent
research relevance and and salience of the
proposal timeliness of the identified problem or
presents a problem or issue issue are
general are shown. The comprehensively
not
Context (15 description of need to conduct discussed. Different
described
points) the topic or action research as aspects of the action
(no points)
focus of a way to address research setting are
inquiry or improve the elaborated showing
Rationale (5 points) situation is in depth and critical
of the explained. analysis of the
Action (12 points) situation. (15 points)
Research The action The proposal The rationale, extent
(30 points) research outlines when and and limitation of the
proposal where the intervention,
mentions an intervention, innovation or strategy
Proposed
intervention, innovation or are explained in
Intervention, not
innovation or strategy will be detail. Its plausibility as
Innovation, presented
strategy to be undertaken, and a way to address the
Strategy (no points)
tried out to who will be problem or issue is
(15 points)
address the involved. Activities given support (15
problem or to be undertaken points)
issue (8 are stated. (12
points) points)
The action The research The research
research questions (s) question(s) logically
proposal has specify the action proceeds from the
a stated aim, research variables context of the inquiry.
objective, or (s) or the focus of It clearly relates to the
general inquiry. Key identified problem or
Action Research Questions not stated
research elements of the issue and conveys the
(30 points) (no points)
questions (5). research desired change of
(5 points) questions (s) are improvement. (30
reflected in the points)
title of the
proposal. (25
points)
Main Sub- Increasing Levels of Quality and their Descriptions Comments or
Score
Criteria criteria low ► high ' Suggestions
The action
research
proposal
states the
Participants Details are provided about the target
target
Action and/or other participants (ex: number, characteristics,
participants
Research Sources of not stated sampling procedure, if any) and/or other
and/or other
Methods Data and (no points) sources of data and information. Clear
source of
(30 points) Information rationale for their inclusion in the study is
data and
(10) given. (10 points)
information
(ex: learners,
teachers,
documents,
realia,
learners'
products,
others) (5
points)
Details of the
data gathering The proposal explains
method(s) are why the selected data
The action provided: the gathering methods (s)
research specific kinds of is suited to the nature
proposal data, how and and purpose of the
presents a when they will be action research. The
Data general collected (ex: data gathering
Not
Gathering description of pretest and methods (s) is aligned
described
Method(s) the posttest scores). with the research
(no points)
(100 method(s) to Research questions (s). Research
be employed instruments, if any, instruments, if any, are
for gathering are described (ex: appropriate for
data. (5 test, scale, survey obtaining the desired
points) questionnaire, kind of data/
checklist, information. (10
interview guide, points)
others) (8 point)
Details of the
The action
methods(s) of
research The selected method
data analysis are
proposal of data analysis is
given. Techniques
presents a shown to be
(ex:
general appropriate to the
quantitative/statist
Data Analysis not stated description of nature of the
ical, qualitative, or
Plan (10) (no points) how the data/information to
both methods), as
gathered be gathered and for
well as tools (ex:
data/informa addressing the
software) to be
tion will be research question (s).
employed are
analyzed. (5 (10 points)
specified. (8
points)
points)
The action
A detailed workplan is provided covering
research
start to completion of the action research.
Action proposal
Timelines are realistic and show concretely
Work Plan not includes a list
how the action research will unfold over the
and included of major
allowed period. The overall plan reflects the
Timelines (no points) items and
proponent's capacity to concretize ideas
(5 points) their
into clear and sequential steps to be
estimated
undertaken. (5 points)
costs..
The action
research
proposal A detailed breakdown of items with their
includes a list corresponding costs is furnished. The items
of major and costs reasonably reflect the funding
not
Cost items and needs of the action research and adhere to
included
Estimates their the BERF guidelines. The overall plan reflects
(no points)
estimated the proponent's capacity to project
costs. The specific expenses that she or he be
total cost is accountable for. (5 points)
shown. (3
points)

Total
Sc ore

Evaluated by:

School Research Committee

(Signature above printed name)
Note to secretariat:

1. To get the average score:

1st evaluator score + 2nd evaluator score +...+ nth evaluator score
No. of evaluators

Decision box

Score Decision
Less than 70% Disapproved
70 % or higher Approved

2. Take note of the comments and suggestions of SRC from the above scoring
checklist to be listed in the 1st column of "Response to Suggestions and
Comments of SRC Committee".
Enclosure No. 8
CAR-ME FORM NO. 1 (SRC Copy)

CHECKLIST FOR EVALUATING CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH (CAR) TITLE

Name of Teacher :

Name of School:
CAR Title:

Please respond to the following questions by checking Yes or No or providing the appropriate remarks.

A. ACTION RESEACH TITLE Yes No Output/Remarks

1. Has been presented to the School Research Committee (SRC)

2. Shows responsiveness to real classroom-based situation

3. Specify a problem

4. Indicates a proposed solution

5. States the selected participants in the study

Checked by:

SRC Member SRC Member

SRC Member SRC Member

SRC Co-Chair SRC Chair

SRC Adviser

Noted by:

Teacher-Researcher
Enclosure No.

CAR-ME FORM NO. 2 (SDRC Copy)

SUMMARY REPORT ON MONITORING & EVALUATING

CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH PROGRESS
(Research Tools/Instruments)
Part I

Name of School:
Total No. of Teachers:
No. of Teachers Monitored

Part II
1. What difficulty did the teacher-researchers encounter in developing the research tools/
instruments?

2. What interventions/actions/solutions did the School Research Committee (SRC) provide

to the teacher-researchers?

3. What suggestions/recommendations can the SRC give to make the research activity easy
for the teacher-researchers?

Submitted by:

SRC Member SRC Member

SRC Member SRC Member

Co-Chair SRC Chair

SRC Adviser
Enclosure No. 10

CAR-ME FORM NO. 3 (SDRC Copy)

SUMMARY REPORT ON MONITORING & EVALUATING

CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH PROGRESS
(CONDUCT OF THE STUDY)
Part I

Name of School:
Total No. of Teachers:
No. of Teachers Monitored:

1 What dittic:ultv did the teacher-researchers encounter in conductino trip research'?

2. What interventions/actions/solutions did the School Research Committee (SRC) provide

to the teacher-researchers?

3. What suggestions/recommendations can the SRC give to make the research activity easy
for the teacher-researchers?

4. What are the ethical considerations and protocols that are taken into account in order to
produce a valid Classroom Action Research (CAR)?

Submitted by:

SRC Member SRC Member

SRC Member SRC Member

SRC Co-Chair SRC Chair

SRC Adviser
Enclosure No. 11

CAR-ME FORM NO. 4 (SDRC Copy)

SUMMARY REPORT ON MONITORING AND EVALUATING

CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH PROGRESS
(DATA PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS)
Part I

Name of School:
Total No. of Teachers:
No. of Teachers Monitored:

Part II

1. What difficulty did the teacher-researchers encounter in crafting the following:

a. Data Processing

b. Data Analysis

2. What interventions/actions/solutions did the School Research Committee (SRC) provide

to the teacher-researchers?

3. What suggestions/recommendations can the SRC give to make the research activity easy
for the teacher-researchers?

Submitted by:

SRC Member SRC Member

SRC Member SRC Member

SRC Chair SRC Co-Chair

SRC Adviser
Enclosure No. 12

CAR-ME FORM NO. 5 (SDRC Copy)

SUMMARY REPORT ON MONITORING AND EVALUATING

CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH PROGRESS
(INTERPRETATION AND PRESENTATION OF DATA)
Part I

Name of School:
Total No. of Teachers:
No. of Teachers Monitored:

Part II

1. What difficulty did the teacher-researchers encounter in crafting the following:

a. Interpretation of Data

b. Presentation of Data

2. What interventions/actions/solutions did the School Research Committee (SRC) provide

to the teacher-researchers?

3. What suggestions/recommendations can the SRC give to make the research activity easy
for the teacher-researchers?

Submitted by:

SRC Member SRC Member

SRC Member SRC Member

SRC Co-Chair SRC Chair

SRC Adviser
Enclosure No. 13

CAR-ME FORM NO. 6 (SDRC Copy)

SUMMARY REPORT ON MONITORING & EVALUATING

CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH PROGRESS
(CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION)
Part I

Name of School:
Total No. of Teachers:
No. of Teachers Monitored:

Part II

1. What interventions/actions/solutions did the School Research Committee (SRC) provide

to the teacher-researchers throughout the course of the study?

2. What are the expected outcomes from the conducted CARs that can be aligned to the strategic
directions of your school?

Submitted by:

SRC Member SRC Member

SRC Member SRC Member

SRC Co-Chair SRC Chair

SRC Adviser
Enclosure No. 14

TYPESETTING THE FULL PAPER FOR ACTION RESEARCH

Side margins: Top and Bottom — 1.75; Left and right — 2
formatted for 8.27 x 11.69-inch paper

Research Title (Calibri 14, all caps, centered)

IMPACTS OF REGIONAL TRAINING ON ACTION RESEARCH AMONG MASTER
TEACHERS

Author (Calibri 20, Centered)

Warren A. Ramos
Regional Supervisor, Special Science High Schools
Policy, Planning and Research Division, DepEd-NCR
[email protected]

ABSTRACT (250-300 words, Calibri 11, italics, single-space- refer to the rubrics)

Keywords: Intensive training, action research, quality, governance, mixed-method design, master
teachers

INTRODUCTION (Included here are the background/rationale of the study, the statement
Abstract of
of the problem/purpose, theoretical/ conceptual framework, literature review. The use of
strategic tools is highly recommended. The whole article must not be more than 8,000 Chapter I only
words.) Font (Calibri 11, Normal, Double-space)

METHOD (Stated here are the research design, participants/ respondents, sampling plan,
instrument used, data collection process, action plan and statistical tests)
Abstract only of
Methodology
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION (Explained here are textual/tabular results, and discussion)

Heading (Calibri 11, all caps, bold, right-aligned)

Sub-heading (Calibri 11, lowercase, first capitalized, bold, left-aligned)

Sub-sub-heading (Calibri 11, Sentence case, bold, italics, left-aligned)

Each table, drawing, illustration, graph, etc. must be prepared and included within the text of the
manuscript (not on separate pages) where the author would like the item to be placed. Tables, figures, etc.
should be numbered and labelled according to guidelines in the Publication Manual of the American
Psychological Association (APA) (5th Ed.)

CONCLUSIONS

RECOMMENDATIONS
REFERENCES (Use APA format)

Duncan, G.J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (Eds.). (1997).Consequences of growing up poor. New

Book York: Russell Sage Foundation

Orleans A. (2007). The condition of secondary school physics education in the Philippines:
Journal Recent developments and remaining challenges for substantive improvements. Australian
Educational Researcher, 34 (1), 33-54.
Article

Darling-Hammond L. (2000). Teacher quality andstudent achievement: A review of state

Electronic
policy evidence.Educational Policy Archives, 8 (1), viewed 9 June 2007,
Journal
iiitp://epaa.asu.edu/epaaJv8n1,,
Article

Belen, Jose Alejandro R. (2012).Thesis Writing Primer. First Edition,

Rex Bookstore, Inc. (RBSI),Manila,www.rexbookstore.com

Campbell, W., Ballou, S. and Slade, C. (2010).Form and Style, 8th

Edition, Houghton Mifflin Company Boston. Massachusetts, USA

Macaspac, Imelda., Tamayo,M. Manabat, E. Lansangan, L., Gueco,

A., David, R. Bondoc, V, (2014) Action Research Made Easy,
LORIMAR Publishing Inc., Adriana Printing Co., Inc., Metro
Manila

Sagor, Richard, (2011). The Action Research Guidebook: a four-stage

process for educators and school teams.CORWIN- A sage
Company, USA. Retrieved on June 2, 2015 from
https://books.google.com.ph/actionreasearch/sagorrichard/sagepublishing
Enclosure No. 15

Narrative Report

BULI ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

(Font: Calibri Font size :14 Alignment: center)

3RD SCHOOL-BASED RESEARCH CONFERENCE

(Font: Calibri Font size :11 Alignment: center)

COWTE NT/800Y
Ctlebri
Font Size: It
Ai %tomcat oust ited
single
Enclosure No. 16

CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH: SELF-EVALUATIONCHECKLIST

Criteria: Please tick "Yes" or "No" depending whether you fulfill the criteria. If you do not currently
fulfill an essential criterion, please note the necessary improvements where needed.

CRITERIA YES NO IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED

1. My title has...

a. problem
b. proposed intervention/solution
c. participants/respondents

2. The abstract ...

a. summarizes the full research in one paragraph

b. presents brief information on the objective,

procedure, results, discussion and finally the
conclusion of the research.

3. The introduction has..

a. brief background of the problem

b. reasons behind the conduct of the research
4. The method of the study...

a. presents the description of the process used in the

research
b. explains who and how are the respondents chosen
5. The findings of the study..
a. presents the data obtained

b. summarizes the data using means, percentages, or

other descriptive statistics.
c. Use figures/tables/graphs to enhance clarity of
presentation of information.
6. The conclusion..
a. provides a summary arising from the findings and
the discussion.
7. The recommendation..
a. provides a beneficial guide that will not only
resolve certain issues, but result in a beneficial
outcome.
b. states realizations/reflections for self-growth and
professional improvement

Prepared by
(Signature above Printed Name)
Position
Grade/Department:

Checked by:

School Principal