Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

    • 162 views

    Training Evaluation Form

    Uploaded by

    Roseman Tumaliuan
    This document appears to be an evaluation form for participants of a training held by the Department of Education Region 02 (Cagayan Valley) Schools Division of Isabela. The form has several sections for evaluating different aspects of the training such as sessions and speakers, module design, program objectives and content, and administrative arrangements. Participants are asked to rate various statements using a scale and provide suggestions, benefits gained, and an overall assessment of the training. The form will be used to collect feedback to improve future trainings conducted by the Department of Education.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Training Evaluation Form

    Uploaded by

    Roseman Tumaliuan
    162 views3 pages
    This document appears to be an evaluation form for participants of a training held by the Department of Education Region 02 (Cagayan Valley) Schools Division of Isabela. The form has several sections for evaluating different aspects of the training such as sessions and speakers, module design, program objectives and content, and administrative arrangements. Participants are asked to rate various statements using a scale and provide suggestions, benefits gained, and an overall assessment of the training. The form will be used to collect feedback to improve future trainings conducted by the Department of Education.

    Original Title

    TRAINING-EVALUATION-FORM

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document appears to be an evaluation form for participants of a training held by the Department of Education Region 02 (Cagayan Valley) Schools Division of Isabela. The form has several sections for evaluating different aspects of the training such as sessions and speakers, module design, program objectives and content, and administrative arrangements. Participants are asked to rate various statements using a scale and provide suggestions, benefits gained, and an overall assessment of the training. The form will be used to collect feedback to improve future trainings conducted by the Department of Education.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    162 views3 pages

    Training Evaluation Form

    Uploaded by

    Roseman Tumaliuan
    This document appears to be an evaluation form for participants of a training held by the Department of Education Region 02 (Cagayan Valley) Schools Division of Isabela. The form has several sections for evaluating different aspects of the training such as sessions and speakers, module design, program objectives and content, and administrative arrangements. Participants are asked to rate various statements using a scale and provide suggestions, benefits gained, and an overall assessment of the training. The form will be used to collect feedback to improve future trainings conducted by the Department of Education.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 3

    Republic of the Philippines

    Department of Education
    Region 02 (Cagayan Valley)
    Schools Division of Isabela
    SAN PABLO DISTRICT
    Poblacion, San Pablo, Isabela 3329

    TRAINING EVALUATION TOOL


    (Daily Evaluation Tool)

    A. On Sessions and Resource Speakers/Facilitators

    4= Strongly Agree| 3=Agree| 2=Disagree| 1=Strongly Disagree


    Strongly Strongly
    Agree Disagree
    Relevant Items Agree Disagree
    (3) (2)
    (4) (1)
    1. The sessions started on time.
    2. The sessions ended on time.
    3. The topics were relevant to my area of work.
    4. The learning objectives of the sessions were
    met.
    5. The sessions were relevant to what I might be
    expected.
    6. The time allotted for the sessions were
    sufficient for me to absorb or accomplish
    outputs.
    7. The organization and sequence of topics
    facilitated my learning.
    8. The facilitator/speakers stimulated my interest
    in the subject matter.
    9. The speakers/facilitators demonstrate
    mastery of topic.
    10. The speakers/facilitators encouraged
    participation.
    11. The speakers/facilitators explained the topics
    in an understandable level/in a clear and
    effective manner.
    12. The speakers/facilitators answered questions
    clearly and completely.
    13. The facilitators’ skills on the use of delivery
    support materials (the use of slide decks)
    aided my learning.
    14. The participants were able to demonstrate
    their learning.
    15. The speakers/facilitators demonstrated a
    positive attitude.

    1
    B. On Module Design*

    4= Strongly Agree| 3=Agree| 2=Disagree| 1=Strongly Disagree


    Strongly Strongly
    Agree Disagree
    Relevant Items Agree Disagree
    (3) (2)
    (4) (1)
    1. The learning objectives were clearly stated.
    2. The topics were well-organized and
    relevant.
    3. The materials used in the module were clear
    and easy to understand.

    Suggestion(s) on how the module/s can be further improved or other information/comments that
    may useful in evaluating this module: *

    _______________________________________________________________________________

    Please list any major benefits you received from the module/s: *
    ________________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________________

    What is your Overall Assessment of the module/s? *

    Excellent
    Very Satisfactory
    Good
    Poor

    C. On Program Objectives, Content and Result*

    4= Strongly Agree| 3=Agree| 2=Disagree| 1=Strongly Disagree


    Strongly Strongly
    Agree Disagree
    Relevant Items Agree Disagree
    (3) (2)
    (4) (1)
    1. Program objectives were fully achieved.
    2. Program content was sufficient to meet the
    objectives.
    3. The pacing and duration of the program were
    just right.
    4. The program content introduced new and
    relevant ideas that are useful for personal,
    interpersonal, and organizational
    advancement.

    2
    5. This program is highly recommended to
    others.

    Cite the benefits you gained from the program. Please suggest module(s) or topic(s) to be
    included in the future trainings: *
    ________________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________________
    Cite your important learning on the simulation of the different online platforms discussed: *

    ________________________________________________________________________________

    D. On Administrative Arrangements*

    4= Strongly Agree| 3=Agree| 2=Disagree| 1=Strongly Disagree


    Strongly Strongly
    Agree Disagree
    Relevant Items Agree Disagree
    (3) (2)
    (4) (1)
    1. Program was well prepared and managed.
    2. The registration process was organized and
    systematic.
    3. Relevant information (registration, Weblink,
    sessions, etc.) were available and
    accessible.
    4. The members of the secretariat were
    efficient, response-able, and courteous in
    answering concerns via email/phone call.

    Suggestion(s) on how to further improve the management of the program: *

    ________________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________________

    QAD/JOD/References: NEAP-CO Online Training Evaluation Tool; CESB Online Evaluation Form

    You might also like