Labor Standards Azucena Notes
Labor Standards Azucena Notes
Labor Standards Azucena Notes
providing for certain standards of terms & conditions of EENT or providing a legal framework
w/in w/c these terms & conditions & the EENT relationship may be negotiated, adjusted &
administered.
1. Labor Standards – sets out the minimum terms, conditions & benefits of EENT that EERS must
provide or comply w/ & to w/c EES are entitled as a matter of legal right.
2. Labor Relations – defines the status, rights & duties and the institutional mechanisms, that
govern the indiv & collective interactions of EERS, EES, or their representatives.
Labor – physical toil although it does not necessarily exclude the application of skill (thus
“skilled” & “unskilled” labor)
Skill – the familiar knowledge of any art/science, united w/ readiness & dexterity in
execution/performance or in the application of the art/science to practical purposes.
Work – (broader than labor) – covers all forms of physical/mental exertion, or both combined, for
the attainment of some obj other than recreation/amusement per se.
Worker – (broader than EE) – may refer to self-employed people & those working in the service &
under the control of another, regardless of rank, title, or nature of work.
Employee – a salaried person working for another who controls or supervises the means, manner
or method of doing the work.
Social legislation – includes laws that provide particular kinds of protection/benefits to society in
furtherance of social justice.
- promotion of the welfare of the ppl, the adoption by the Govt of measures
calculated to insure economic stability of all the component elements of society through the
maintenance of proper economic & social equilibrium in the interrelations of the members of
the community, constitutionally, through the adoption of measures legally justifiable, or extra-
constitutionally, through the exercise of powers underlying the existence of all govts.
1987 Consti: protects the rights of workers & promote their welfare
1. to organize themselves
2. to conduct collective bargaining/negotiation w/ mgt;
3. to engage in peaceful concerted activities, including to strike in accordance w/ law; and
4. to participate in policy & decision-making processes affecting rights & benefits
Other Consti provisions that protect the Rs/promote the welfare of workers
Consti – prol-labor, but recognizes the indispensable role of the private sector, encourages private
enterprise and provides incentives to needed investments
- the power of the govt to enact laws, w/in Constitutional limits to promote the order,
safety, health, morals & general welfare of society
- power inherent in govt to protect itself & all its constituents, & for this purpose to hold
the govt immune so far as necessary, from any limitatins imposed in the past.
- An imposition of restraint upon liberty or property in order to foster the common good.
Birth of the LC
LC – designed to be a dynamic & growing body of laws w/c will reflect continually the lessons of
practical application & experience
7 Principles Underlying the code
1. Labor relations must be made both responsive & responsible to national devt
2. Labor laws/labor relations during a period of national emergency must substitute
rationality for confrontation; strikes or lockouts give way to a rational process w/c is
arbitration
3. Laggard justice in the labor field is injurious to the workers, the EERS & the public; labor
justice can be made expeditious w/o sacrificing due process.
4. Manpower devt & EENT must be regarded as a major dimension of labor policy, for
there can be no real equality of bargaining power under conditions of severe mass
unemployment.
5. There is a global labor market available to qualified Filipinos, esp those who are
unemployed or whose EENT is tantamount to unemployment bcoz of their very little
earnings.
6. Labor laws must command adequate resources & acquire a capable machinery for
effective & sustained implementation; when labor laws cannot be enforced, both EERS &
the workers are penalized, & only a corrupt few (those who are in charge of
implementation) may get the reward they don’t deserve.
7. There shld be popular participation in national policy-making through what is now called
tripartism.
Art 3. [Declaration of Basic Polici] The State shall afford protection to labor, promote full
EENT, ensure equal work opportunities regardless of sex, race or creed, and regulate the
relations bet workers & EERS. The State shall assure the rights of workers to self-org,
collective bargaining, security of tenure, and just & humane conditions of work.
Balanced Approach – shared responsibility. Worker & EER sectors are interdependent.
Art4. [Construction in Favor of Labor] All doubts in the implementation & interpretation of the
provisions of this Code, including its IRRs, shall be resolved in favor of labor.
Interpretation & Construction – policy is to extend the decree’s applicability to a greater number of
EES to enable them to avail of the benefits under the law (Liberal approach is adopted)
Concern for the Lowly Worker – SC reaffirms its concern for the lowly worker who, often at his
EER’s mercy, must look up to the law for his protection. (Reason: the EER stands on higher
footing than the EE: (1,) There is greater supply than demand for labor; (2) the need for EENT
by labor comes from vital & even desperate necessity.)
Mgt Rights – entitled to respect & enforcement in the interest of simple fair play.
1. R to manage, control, and use his property & conduct business in a manner satisfactory to
himself (just discrimination in the rate of wages paid to the skillful & to the unskillful, to
the efficient & inefficient.)
2. R to prescribe rules (they become part of the contract of EENT)
3. R to select EES & to decide when to engage them, except as restricted by statute or valid
contract, at a wage & under conditions agreeable to them.
4. R to transfer & discharge EES in order to minimize expenses & to insure stability of the
business & even to close the business, provided it is done in good faith & due to causes
beyond control.
Art 5. [Rules & Regulations] the DOLE & other govt agencies charged w/ the administration &
enforcement of this Code or any of its parts shall promulgate the necessary IRRs. Such RRs
shall become effective 15 days after announcement of their adoption in the newspapers of gen.
circulation.
Art 6. [Applicability] All Rs & benefits granted to workers under this Code shall, except as may
otherwise be provided herein, apply alike to all workers, whether agricultural or non-
agricultural.
In all cases, the landowners may retain an area of not more than 7 hectares if such
landowner is cultivating such area or will now cultivate it.
Art 9. [Determination of Land Value] For the purpose of determining the cost of the land to be
transferred to the tentant-farmer, the value of the land shall be equivalent to 2 & ½ times the
average harvest of 3 normal crop yrs immediately preceding the promulgation of PD 27 (OCT
21, 1972).
The total cost of the land, including interest at the rate of 6% per annum, shall be pd by
the tenant in 15 yrs of 15 equal annual amortizations.
In case of default, the amortizations due shall be pd by the farmers’ cooperative in w/c the
defaulting tenant-farmer is a member, w/ the coop having a right of recourse against him.
The govt shall guarantee such amortizations w/ shares of stock in govt-owned &
-controlled corps.
Art 10. [Conditions of Ownership] No title to the land acquired by the tenant-farmer under PD 27
shall be actually issued to him unless & until he has become a full-fledged member of a duly
recognized farmers’ coop.
Title to the land acquired pursuant to PD 27 or the Land Reform Program of the Govt
shall not be transferable except by hereditary succession or to the Govt in accdance w/ the
provisions of PD 27, the Code of Agrarian Reforms & other existing laws & regulations.
Art 11. [Implementing Agency] The Dept of Agrarian Reform shall promulgate the necessary rules
& regulations to implement the provisions of this Chapter.
*Land for the landless – battlecry dramatizing the increasingly urgent demand of the dispossessed
for a plot of earth as their place under the sun.
*CARP Law – signed by Cory, declaring full land ownership in favor of the beneficiaries of the
PD 27.
Share tenancy – abolished, put the agricultural leasehold sys in its stead, geared towards eventual
ownership of land by its tillers
Consti - State shall undertake an Agrarian Reform Program, and encourage & undertake the just
distribution of all agri lands, subj to such priorities & reasonable retention limits as the
Congress may prescribe,
Compensation scheme: Sec 18 of CARP: Title to all expropriated properties shall be transferred to
the State only upon full payment of compensation of their respective owners.
Retention Limits – provided for by RA 6657 : as otherwise provided.. no person may own/retain
directly/indirectly, any public/private agri land, the size of w/c shall vary accdg to factors
governing a viable family-sized farm, such as commodity produced, terrain, infrastructure, &
soil fertility as determined by the Presidential Agrarian Reform Council (PARC).
3 hectares – may be awarded to each child of the landowner, subj to the ff qualifications: (1.)
he is at least 15 y/o, and (2) he is actually tilling the land or directly managing the farm;
Provided, that landowners whose lands have been covered b PD 27 shall be allowed to keep the
area originally retained by them thereunder; Provided further, that orig homestead grantees or
direct compulsory heirs who still own the org homestead at the time of the approval of this Act
shall retain the same areas as long as the continue to cultivate said homestead.
3. Livestock, poultry & Swine raising lands: Sec 2 of RA 6657 w/c includes “private agri lands
devoted to commercial livestock, poultry & swine raising” in the definition of “commercial
farms” is invalid. They are covered by the agrarian reform prog of the State.
- an increased output invariably gives more work to more men, & never in the history of
the world has it more than temporarily, and then for only a very short time, diminished by
the number of men at work in any trade
- unemployment is the greatest exploiter of labor. Mass unemployment tends to leave the
EER all-powerful and the worker defenseless
- 2 kinds of funds: (1) the Revenue – w/c is over & above what is necessary for the
maintenance; and (2) the Stock – w/c is over & above shat is necessary for the EENT of
their masters.
- The demand for those who live by wages necessarily increases w/ the increase of the
revenue & stock of every country and cannot increase w/o it. The increase of revenue &
stock is the increase of national wealth.
“An Exploited Class” – J. Reynato Puno
Aim: A more equitable distribution & ownership of land, w/ due regard to the rights of landowners
to just compensation & to the ecological needs of the nation
Basis: the R of farmers & regular farm workers, who are landless, to own directly or collectively
the lands they till or, in the case of other farm workers, to receive a share of the fruits thereof
The State:
- shall respect the R of small landowners & shall provide incentives for voluntary land-
sharing
- shall recognize the R of farmers, farm workers & landowners, as well as cooperatives &
other independent farmers org, to participate in the planning, org, & mgt of the program
& shall provide support to agriculture though tech & research & financial, production,
marketing & other support services
- may resettle landless farmers & farm workers in its own agricultural estates
- shall encourage the formation & maintenance of economic-sized family farms to be
constituted by indiv beneficiaries & small landowners
- shall protect the Rs of subsistence fishermen to the preferential use of communal marine
& fishing resources both inland & offshore
- shall provide support to such fishermen thru appropriate tech & research, adequate
financial, production & marketing assistance
- shall protect offshore fishing grounds of subsistence fishermen against foreign intrusion.
Fisherworkers shall redeive a just share from their labor in the utilization of marine &
fishing resources
- owners of agri land have the oblig to cultivate directly or thru labor admin the lands they
own & thereby make the land productive.
- Shall provide incentives to landowners to invest the proceeds of the agrarian reform prog
to promote industrialization, EENT & privatization of pub sector enterprises
- May lease undeveloped lands of pub domain to qualified entities for the devt of capital-
intensive farms, traditional & pioneering crops esp those for export (subj. to Rs of
beneficiaries)
Definitions
5. Idle / Abandoned Land – any agricultural land not cultivated, tilled or developed to produce any
crop nor devoted to any specific economic purpose continuously for a period of 3 yrs
immediately prior to the receipt of notice of acquisition by the govt
- but does NOT include land that has become permanently or regularly devoted
to non-agricultural purposes
- does NOT include land w/c has become unproductive by reason of force
majeure or F event
6. Farmer – a natural person whose primary livelihood is cultivation of land or the production of
agri crops either by himself, or primarily w/ the assistance of his immediate farm household,
whether the land is owned by him, or by another person under a leasehold or tenancy
agreement
h. Cooperatives – orgs composed primarily of small agri producers, farmers, farmworkers or other
agrarian reform beneficiaries who voluntarily organize themselves for the purpose of pooling
land, human, technological, financial or other economic resources & operated on the principle
of one member, one vote. ( a juridical person may be a member of a coop, w/ the same Rs &
duties as a natural person.
Scope: all public & private agricultural lands, incl. other lands of the pub domain suitable for
agriculture
1. All alienable & disposable lands of the pub domain devoted to or suitable for agriculture
2. All lands of the pub domain in excess to the specific limits as determined by Congress
3. All other lands owned by the Govt devoted to or suitable for agri
4. All private lands devoted to or suitable for agri regardless of the agri products raised/can
be raised thereon
Retention Limits: no person may own or retain, directly, any pub or private agricultural land, the
size of w/c shall vary accdg to factors governing a viable family-sized farm
Presidental Agrarian Reform Council (PARC) – shall provide the implementing rules
- upon recommendation by the Provincial Agrarian Reform coordinating
Committee, may declare certain provinces/regions as priority land reform areas
Multinational Corps – all lands of the pub domain leased, held, or possessed by multi corps or
assocs, and other lands owned by the govt, or govt-owned/-controlled corps, assocs,
institutions or entities, devoted to existing & operational agribusiness or agro-industrial
enterprises, operated by multicorps shall be programmed for acquisition & distribution
immediately upon effictivity
Ancestral Lands – shall include, but not limited to, lands in the actual, continuous & open
possession & occupation of the community and its members, provided that the Torrens System
shall be respected
1. Lands actually, directly & exclusively used for parks, wildlife, forest reserves,
reforestation, fish sanctuaries and breeding grounds, watersheds and mangroves
2. Private lands actually, directly & exclusively used for prawn farms & fishponds (provided
that said prawn farms & fishponds have not been distributed and Cert of Land Ownership
Award issued to ARP.
3. Lands actually, directly & exclusively used & found to be necessary for national defense,
school sites & campuses, incl experimental farm stations operated by pub/private schools
for educational purposes, seeds and seedlings research and pilot production center, church
sites & convents apputenat therety, mosque sites & Islamic centers appurtenant thereto,
communal burial grounds & cemeteries, penal colonies & penal farms actually worked by
inmates, got & private research & quarantine centers and all lands w/ 18% slope and over,
except those already developed
1. After having identified the land, the landowners & beneficiaries, DAR shall send its
notice to acquire the land to the owners;
2. w/in 30 days from date of receipt, landowners shall inform the DAR of his
acceptance/rejection of the offer;
a. if landowner accepts the offer, the LBP shall pay the landowner of the purchase
price of the land w/in 30 days after he executes & delivers a deed of transfer in
favor of the Govt and surrenders the Cert of Title
b. in case of rejection or failure to reply, DAR shall conduct summary admin
proceedings to determine compensation of the land
3. upon receipt of the landowner of the payment, or in case of rejection or no response fr the
landowner, upon the deposit w/ an accessible bank or the compensation, the DAR shall
take immediate possession of the land & shall request the Register of Deeds to issue a
TCT in the name of the RP.
4. Any party who disagrees w/ the decision may bring the matter to the court
*Provided: children of landowners who are qualified shall be given preference in the distribution
of the land of their parents
*Provided further: actual tenant-tillers in the landholding shall not be ejected/removed therefrom.
*Provided, that the children/spouse of the transferor shall have a R to repurchase the land fr the
govt/LBP w/in 2 yrs
Standing crops at the time of acquisition – shall be retained by the landowner, Dar shall give a
reasonable time to harvest the same
Corporate Farms
- in case land cannot be divided directly, shall be owned collectively by the worker-
beneficiaries who shall form a workers cooperative or assoc w/c will deal w/ the corp
- indiv members of the coop shall be provided w/ homelots or small farmlots for their
family use taken fr the land owned by the coop
Support Services
1. irrigation facilities
2. infrastructure devt & pub works projects
3. govt subsidies for the use of irrig facilities
RA 9700 – Act Strengthening the CARP, extending the acquisition & distribution of all
agricultural lands, instituting necessary reforms, amending for the purpose certain provisions of
RA 6657
- State shall protect Filipino enterprises against unfair foreign competition & trade
practices
- State recognizes that there is not enough agricultural land to be divided & distributed to
each farmer & regular farmworker so that each one can own his economic-size family
farm.
- Answer: simultaneous industrialization aimed at developing a self-reliant & independent
national economy effectively controlled by Filipinos
- State may, in the interest of national welfare or defense, establish & operate vital
industries
- Implementation of the prog shall be community-based
- State shall recognize & enforce the Rs of rural women to own & control land
- State shall provide incentives to landowners to invest the proceeds of the agrarian reform
prog to promote industrialization, EENT & privatization of the pub sector enterprises
Added Definition
1. Rural women – women who are engaged directly/indirectly in farming and/or fishing as
their source of livelihood, whether paid or unpaid, regular or seasonal, or in food
preparation, managing the household, caring for the children, & other similar activities
2. Landless beneficiary – one who owns less than 3 hectares of agri land
- Provincial, city & mun govt units acquiring private agri lands by expropriation to be used for
actual, direct & exclusive pub purposes, such as roads & bridges, pub markets, school sites,
resettlement sites, local govt facilities, pub parks & brgy plazas or squares consistent shall not
be subj to the 5-hectare retention limit
Order of Priority
Facts:
3 parcels of land were originally owned by the Aragons, tenanted by the late Arcadio
Landicho from 1949 until his death in 1972, afterwhich, his tenancy rights were succeded by
his son, petitioner Francisco Landicho (the other petitioners were Buenaventura (Francisco’s
son), and Federico (Francisco’s brother), helped him cultivate the land
in 1976, Francisco voluntarily surrendered his tenancy Rs over the land to the Aragons
through a notarized “kasulatan” for a consideration of P1,000, but petitioners continued
cultivating the land until 1987 when Francisco executed another notarized “kasulatan” thru
w/c he surrendered his tenancy rights for a consideration of P3,000.
On the same day as the execution of the 1987 kasulatan, the lands were sold by the Aragons
for P50,000 to respondent Felix Sia, who in turn converted the same to a residential subd w/o
a DAR clearance and ejected the petitioners therefrom.
Peitioners filed a protest before the DAR alleging that they are the tenants of the lands and
claimed that they are entitled to a disturbance compensation. They alleged that they were
fooled into signing over their tenancy rights thru the machinations of the Aragons.
The respondents in their answer, denied such allegation and added that the petitioners are
barred by estoppel, laches and prescription
Held: A tenant is defined as a person who, himself and w/ the aid available from w/in his
immediate farm household, cultivates the land belonging to, or possessed by another, w/ the
latter’s consent for purposes of production, sharing the produce w/ the landholder under the
share tenancy system, or paying to the landholder a price certain or ascertainable in produce or
in money or both, under the leasehold tenancy system
For a tenancy relationship to exist, all of the ff essential requisites must be present:
Under the definition, only Francisco possesses the requisites of a tenant. Petitioners Federico
and Buenaventura are not tenants because consent (#3) by the landowners is lacking. They
are merely farm helpers of Francisco as part of his immediate farm household. There was
also no evidence to show that they gave a share of their harvest to the Aragons (#6).
Issue 2: WON the respondents took advantage of Francisco’s old age & illiteracy and employed
fraudulent schemes in order to deceive him into signing the Kasulatans
Held: As the legal tenant of the lands, Francisco had voluntarily surrendered his tenancy rights
when he knowingly & freely executed the 1987 Kasulatan. There was no showing of foul play,
because the Kasulatan was in Filipino, a language spoken & understood by Francisco and was
couched in plain and clear terms. Such kasulatan was also duly notarized and are considered as
public documents executed w/ all the legal formalities which afford it the legal presumption of
regularity and legality abent full, clear and convincing evidence to the contrary.
Final ruling: Petitioners have no cause of action and the same has prescribed.
Facts:
Petitioner was employed by the respondent bank as utility clerk in 1971. Since then, he
had been promoted repeatedly up to 1998 when he was temporarily assigned as caretaker
of the bank and designated as Acting Asst. VP and OIC in June of 1998.
Respondent bank is a banking institution originally known as Royal Savings Bank. In
1983-84, it underwent serious liquidity problems and was placed under receivership by
the Central Bank, which ordered its closure in July of 1984. After 2 months, the
respondent bank was reopened under the control & mgt of Comsavings Bank.
In 1987, the GSIS acquired the interest of the respondent bank and took over the control
& mgt of the bank and renamed it as GSIS Family Savings Bank.
The designation of the petitioner as OIC & caretaker was recalled, however his
appointment as Acting Asst VP was retained.
In line w/ its policy to attain financial stability, the respondent bank adopted measures,
one of w/c is an early retirement program.
In april of 2001, petitioner opted to avail himself of this retirement package, (supposedly
under protest) & received the amt of P1,342M as retirement pay.
In july 2002, petitioner filed a complaint against resp bank for constructive dismissal &
underpayment of wages, 13th month pay & retirement benefits before the Labor Arbiter.
He alleged discrimination & unfair treatment, and intense pressure on the part of the resp
bank forced him to retire at the prime of his life.
Held: No.
Petitioner claims he was discriminated against as new hires were given higher salaries than he was
receiving.
Discrimination – failure to treat all persons equally when no reasonable distinction can be found
bet those favored & those not favored. It must be clearly established that (1) there is no
reasonable distinction for classification that can be obtained bet persons belonging to the same
class, and (2) persons belonging to the same class have not been treated alike
Petitioner failed to established that he possessed the same skills, competencies & expertise as those
newly hired to eliminate the possibility of substantial distinction that may warrant unequal
treatment bet them.
Petitioner contends that in cases of constructive dismissal, the burden of proof rests on the EER to
show that the EE was dismissed on a valid & just cause. But this legal principle presupposes
that there is indeed an involuntary separation from EENT & the facts attendant to such forced
separation was clearly established, w/c the petitioner failed to do. It was him who availed of the
voluntary retirement program. And absent the showing of duress, the presumption is that it was
done by him voluntarily.
While the state promotes the utmost protection of labor against capital, it does not mean that the
working class is upheld in all labor dispute. The law also recognizes the rights of management.
PRE-EMPLOYMENT
1. to promote and maintain a state of full employment through improved manpower training,
allocation and utilization;
2. to protect every citizen desiring to work locally/overseas by securing for him the best
possible terms and condition of employment;
3. to facilitate a free choice of available employment by persons seeking work in conformity
with the national interest;
4. to facilitate & regulate the movement of workers in conformity w/ the national interest;
5. to regulate the employment of aliens, including the establishment of a registration and/or
work permit system;
6. to strengthen the network of public employment offices and rationalize the participation
of the private sector in the recruitment and placement of workers, locally and overseas, to
serve national development objectives;
7. to insure careful selection of Filipino workers for overseas employment in order to protect
the good name of the PH abroad.
The DOLE
1. The promotion of gainful EENT opportunities and the optimization of the devt &
utilization of the country’s manpower resources;
2. The advancement of workers’ welfare by providing for just and humane working
conditions and terms of EENT;
3. The maintenance of industrial peace by promoting harmonious, equitable and stable
EENT, relations that assure protection for the Rs of all concerned parties.
Private fee-charging EEnt Agency – any person/ entity engaged in the recruitment & placement of
workers for a fee w/c is charged directly/indirectly from the workers or employers or both
License – a document issued by the DOLE authorizing a person/entity to operate a private EENT
agency
Private recruitment entity – any person/assoc engaged in the recruitment & placement of workers,
locally/overseas without charging, directly/indirectly any fee from the workers or employers.
Emigrant – any person, worker or otherwise, who emigrates to a foreign country by virtue of an
immigrant visa or resident permit to its equivalent in the country of destination
1. to organize & establish new EENT offices in addition to existing EENT offices under the
DOLE as the need arises;
2. to organize & establish a nationwide job clearance & information system to inform
applicants registering w/ a particular EENT office of job opportunities in other parts of
the country as well as job opportunities abroad;
3. to develop & organize a program that will facilitate occupational industrial and
geographical mobility of labor and provide assistance in the relocation of workers from
one area to another; and
4. to require any person, establishment, org, or institution to submit such EENT information
as may be prescribed by the Sec of Labor.
Bureau of Local Employment (BLE) – assigned the effective allocation of manpower resources in
local
- over all matters/cases involving EE-EER relations including money claims, arising out of
or by virtue of any law or contracts involving Filipino workers for overseas EENT
except seamen: Provided, thet the Bureau of Employment Services (BES) (now BLE)
may, in the case of the NCR, exercise such power, whenever the DOLE deems it
appropriate.
The decisions of the regional offices of the BES if so authorized by the Sec of DOLE shall be
appealable to the NLRC upon the same grounds provided in Art 233 hereof.
Minister of Labor – has the power to impose & collect fees, based on rates recommended by the
BES. Such fees shall be deposited in the National Treasury as a special acct of the General
Fund, for the promotion of the objectives of the BES, subj to the provisions of Sec 40 of PD
1177.
GR: No person/entity other than the public EENT offices, shall engage in the recruitment &
placement of workers.
: Exceptions
POEA – has taken over the functions of the Overseas Employment Development Board (OEDB)
and the National Seamen Board (NSB)
2 Classifications
Regulatory Functions
1. Regulate private sector participation in the recruitment & overseas placement of workers
through its licensing and registration system;
2. Formulate & implement, in coordination w/ appropriate entities concerned, when
necessary, a system for promoting and monitoring the overseas EEnt of Filipino workers
taking into consideration their welfare and the domestic manpower requirements;
3. Inform migrant workers not only of their rights as workers but also of their rights as
human beings;
4. Instruct and guide the workers how to assert their rights and provide the available
mechanism to redress violation of their rights;
5. In the recruitment & placement of workers to service the requirements for trained and
competent Filipino workers of foreign govts and their instrumentalities, and such other
employers as public interest may require, deploy only to countries:
a. Where the PH has concluded Bilateral labor agreements or arrangements;
b. Observing and/or complying w/ the international laws and standards of migrant
workers;
c. Guaranteeing to protect the rights of Filipino migrant workers.
Adjudicatory Functions
1. Administrative cases involving violations of licensing rules & regulations and registration
of recruitment and EEnt agencies/entities; and
2. Disciplinary action cases and other special cases w/c are administrative in character,
involving employers, principals, contracting partners and Filipino migrant workers.
Jurisdiction of POEA
1. all cases w/c are administrative in character, involving or arising out of violations of rules
& regulations relating to licensing & registration of recruitment and employment
agencies/entities; and
2. disciplinary action cases and other special cases w/c are administrative in character,
involving EERS, principals, contracting partners and Filipino migrant workers
3. NO jurisdiction to enforce foreign judgment (must be brought before the regular courts).
POEA is an administrative (not a court), exercising adjudicatory or quasi-judicial
functions
4. NO jurisdiction over torts
COMPROMISE AGREEMENT
-consistent w/ the policy encouraging amicable settlement of labor disputes Sec 10 of RA 8042
allows resolution by compromise of cases filed w/ the NLRC
- any compromise agreement on money claims inclusive of damages shall be paid w/in 4 months
from the approval of the settlement
1. The salary of such official who fails to render his decision/resolution w/in the
prescribed pd shall be, or caused to be, withheld until such official complies
therewith;
2. Suspension for not more than 90 days; or
3. Dismissal w/ disqualification to hold any appointive public office for 5 yrs
If EE is terminated before end of contract w/o just cause, EERS will be ordered to pay their
salaries corresponding to the unexpired portion of their EENT contract
A worker dismissed from overseas EENT w/o just cause as defined by law/contract is entitled to
“full reimbursement of his placement fee w/ interest at 12% per annum, plus the salary for the
unexpired portion of their EENT contract.
Permanent disability – the inability of a worker to perform his job for more than 120 days,
regardless of WON he loses the use of any part of his body
Total Disability – disablement of an EE to earn wages in the same kind of work of similar nature
that he was trained for or accustomed to perform, or any kind of work w/c a person of his
mentality and attainments could do. It does not mean absolute helplessness.
In disability compensation, it is not the injury w/c is compensated, but rather it is the incapacity to
work resulting in the impairment of one’s earning capacity
Disability benefits by seamen – a matter governed not only by medical findings but by law &
contract
- shall be paid beginning on the 1st day of such disability. If caused by an injury/sickness
it shall not be paid longer than 120 consec days except where such injury/sickness still
requires medical attendance beyond 120 days but not to exceed 240 days from onset of
disability in w/c case benefit for temporary total disability shall be paid.
Agencies Given the Duty to promote the welfare & rights of migrant workers:
1. DFA
2. DOLE
3. POEA
4. OWWA – Overseas Workers Welfare Administration – provides social & welfare
services including insurance coverage, legal assistance, placement assistance and
remittance services to Filipino overseas workers. Under RA8042, it shall provide the
Filipino migrant worker & his faily assistance in the enforcement of contractual obligs by
agencies, entities and/or their principals;
5. RPM - Re-Placement and Monitoring Center – develops livelihood programs for the
returning workers to reintegrate the returning migrant workers to the Ph society;
6. NLRC – tasked w/ the settlement/adjudication of labor disputes
Disqualified from Recruitment & Placement of Workers for Overseas EEnt whether for profit or
not
1. Travel agencies & sales agencies of airline companies;
2. Officers/members of the board of any corp or members in a partnership engaged in the
business of a travel agency;
3. Corps & partnerships, when any of its officers, members of the board or partners, is also
an officer, member of the board or partner of a corp or partnership engaged in the
business of a travel agency (interlocking officers)
4. Persons, partnerships or corps which have derogatory records, such as but not limited to:
a. Those certified to have derogatory record/info by the NBI or by the Anti-illegal
Recruitment Branch of the POEA;
b. Those against whom probable cause or prima facie finding of guilt for illegal
recruitment or other related cases exists;
c. Those convicted of cases and/or crimes involving moral turpitude;
d. Those agencies whose licenses have been previously cancelled or revoked by
POEA for violation of RA 8042, PD 442 as amended and their IRR as well as
the Labor Code’s IRR
e. Officials/EES of the DOLE or other govt agencies directly involved in overseas
EENT program and their relatives w/in the 4th degree of consanguinity or
affinity; and
f. Those whose License have been previously cancelled o revoked
* Change of ownership of single proprietorship licensed to engage in overseas EENT shall cause
the automatic revocation of the license.
Non License or Non-Holder of Authority – any person/corp/entity w/c has not been issued a valid
license or authority to engage in recruitment & placement by the Sec of Labor, or whose
license or authority has been suspended, revoked or cancelled by the POEA and the Secretary.
Jurisdiction
The DOLE Sec and the POEA Admin have concurrent jurisdiction to suspend or cancel a license
Contract by Prncipal
Even if it was the principal of the manning agency who entered into contract w/ the EE,
the manning agent in the PH is jointly & solidarily liable w/ the principal
Consequences of Conviction
1. Automatic revocation of license/authority;
2. Forfeiture of the cash & surety bonds;
3. Conviction for the crime of estafa, if found guilty thereof
Note: Max penalty if the person illegally recruited is less than 18 y/o or committed by a non-
licensee or non-holder of authority
Absence of receipts evidencing payment, not fatal to prosecution’s case for illegal recruitment – as
long as the witnesses can positively show through their respective testimonies that the accused
is the one involved in prohibited recruitment
Liability of Local EEnt agency – solidarily liable w/ the foreigh principal for unpaid salaries of a
worker recruited. Before recruiting, the agency is required to submit a doc containing its power
to sue and be sued jointly and solidarily w/ the principal or foreign-based EER for any of the
violations of the recruitment agreement and the contracts of EEnt
Liability of Company Engaged in Illegal Recruitment – may be held as principal, together his
EER, if it is shown that he actively & consciously participated in illegal recruitment
Issuance of search warrant/warrant of arrest
Art 38 is unconstitutional inasmuch as it gives the Sec of Labor the power to issue search
or arrest warrants
The exception is in cases of deportation whom the President or the Commissioner of
Immigration may order arrested, following a final roder of deportation
Note: the Sec of Labor may order closure of illegal recruitment establishments because it is
only administrative & regulatory in nature
Middle-level Manpower
1. Those who have acquired practical skills & knowledge through formal or non-formal
educ & training equivalent to at least a secondary educ but preferably a post-secondary
educ w/ a corresponding degree/diploma; or
2. Skilled workers who have become highly competent in their trade or craft as attested by
industry.
Apprenticeship – practical training on the job supplemented by related theoretical instruction, for a
highly skilled or technical instruction for a period of 3-6 months
Apprentice – a person undergoing training for an approved apprenticeable occupation during an
established period assured by an apprenticeship agreemt
Apprenticeable Occupation – an occupation officially endorsed by a tripartite body and approved
for apprenticeship by the TESDA (no longer the Sec of Labor)
Apprenticeship Agreement – an EENT contract wherein the EER binds himself to train the
apprentice and the apprentice in turn accepts the terms of training
On-the-job training – practical work experience through actual participation in productive
activities given to or acquired by an apprentice
Highly technical industries – a trade, business, enterprise, industry or other activity, w/c is engaged
in the application of advanced technology
Working Hrs – shall not exceed the max number of hrs prescribed by law, if any, for a worker of
his age and sex. Time spent in compulsorily theoretical instruction shall be considered hrs of
work. An apprentice not otherwise barred by law from working 8hrs may be requisted by his
EER to work overtime and paid accordingly.
FACTS:
Petitioner Antonio Serrano was hired by respondents Gallant Maritime Services, Inc. and Marlow
Navigation Co., Inc., under a POEA-approved contract of employment for 12 months, as Chief
Officer, with the basic monthly salary of US$1,400, plus $700/month overtime pay, and 7 days
paid vacation leave per month.
On the date of his departure, Serrano was constrained to accept a downgraded employment
contract upon the assurance and representation of respondents that he would be Chief Officer by
the end of April 1998.
Respondents did not deliver on their promise to make Serrano Chief Officer.
Hence, Serrano refused to stay on as second Officer and was repatriated to the Philippines, serving
only two months and 7 days, leaving an unexpired portion of nine months and twenty-three days.
Upon complaint filed by Serrano before the Labor Arbiter (LA), the dismissal was declared illegal.
On appeal, the NLRC modified the LA decision based on the provision of RA 8042.
Serrano filed a Motion for Partial Reconsideration, but this time he questioned the constitutionality
of the last clause in the 5th paragraph of Section 10 of RA 8042.
ISSUES:
1. Whether or not the subject clause violates Section 10, Article III of the Constitution on non-
impairment of contracts;
2. Whether or not the subject clause violate Section 1, Article III of the Constitution, and Section
18, Article II and Section 3, Article XIII on labor as a protected sector.
HELD:
The answer is in the negative. Petitioner’s claim that the subject clause unduly interferes with the
stipulations in his contract on the term of his employment and the fixed salary package he will
receive is not tenable.
The subject clause may not be declared unconstitutional on the ground that it impinges on the
impairment clause, for the law was enacted in the exercise of the police power of the State to
regulate a business, profession or calling, particularly the recruitment and deployment of OFWs,
with the noble end in view of ensuring respect for the dignity and well-being of OFWs wherever
they may be employed.
To Filipino workers, the rights guaranteed under the foregoing constitutional provisions translate
to economic security and parity.
Upon cursory reading, the subject clause appears facially neutral, for it applies to all OFWs.
However, a closer examination reveals that the subject clause has a discriminatory intent against,
and an invidious impact on, OFWs at two levels:
First, OFWs with employment contracts of less than one year vis-à-vis OFWs with employment
contracts of one year or more;
Second, among OFWs with employment contracts of more than one year; and
The subject clause singles out one classification of OFWs and burdens it with a peculiar
disadvantage.
Thus, the subject clause in the 5th paragraph of Section 10 of R.A. No. 8042 is violative of the
right of petitioner and other OFWs to equal protection.
The subject clause “or for three months for every year of the unexpired term, whichever is less” in
the 5th paragraph of Section 10 of Republic Act No. 8042 is DECLARED
UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
FACTS:
Sometime in the months of January to February, 1996, representing to have the capacity,
authority or license to contract, enlist and deploy or transport workers for overseas employment,
did then and there, willfully, unlawfully and criminally recruit, contract and promise to deploy, for
a fee the herein complainants, namely, Imelda D. Bamba, Geraldine M. Lagman and Alma E.
Singh, for work or employment in Los Angeles, California, U.S.A. in Nursing Home and Care
Center.
Prosecution presented three witnesses, namely Imelda Bamba, Geraldine Lagman and
Alma Singh.
According to Bamba, she met the appellant on a bus. She was on her way to SM North
Edsa where she was a company nurse. Appellant introduced himself as a recruiter of workers for
employment abroad. Appellant told her he could help her get employed as nurse. Appellant gave
his pager number and instructed her to contact him is she’s interested. Sometime in January 1996,
appellant fetched her at her office, went to her house and gave him the necessary documents and
handed to appellant the amount of US$300.00 and the latter showed her a photocopy of her
supposed US visa. However, the appellant did not issue a receipt for the said money. Thereafter,
appellant told her to resign from her work because she was booked with Northwest Airlines and to
leave for USA on Feb, 1996. On the scheduled departure, appellant failed to show up. Instead,
called and informed her that he failed to give the passport and US visa because she had to go to
province because his wife died. Trying to contact him to the supposed residence and hotel where
he temporarily resided, but to no avail.
Winess Lagman testified that she is a registered nurse. In January 1996, she went to SM
North Edsa to visit her cousin Bamba. At that time Bamba informed her that she was going to meet
to appellant. Bamba invited Lagman to go with her. The appellant convinced them of his ability to
send them abroad. On their next meeting, Lagman handed to the latter the necessary documents
and an amount of US$300.00 and 2 bottles of black label without any receipt issued by the
appellant. Four days after their meeting, a telephone company called her because her number was
appearing in appellants cell phone documents. The caller is trying to locate him as he was a
swindler. She became suspicious and told Bamba about the matter. One week before her scheduled
flight, appellant told her he could not meet them because his mother passed away.
Lastly, Alma Singh, who is also a registered nurse, declared that she first met the
appellant at SM North Edsa when Imelda Bamba introduced the latter to her. Appellant told her
that he is an undercover agent of FBI and he could fix her US visa. On their next meeting, she
gave all the pertinent documents. Thereafter, she gave P10,000 to the appellant covering half price
of her plane ticket. They paged the appellant through his beeper to set up another appointment but
the appellant avoided them as he had many things to do.
The accused Jamilosa testified on direct examination that he never told Bamba that he
could get her a job in USA, the truth being that she wanted to leave SM as company nurse because
she was having a problem thereat. Bamba called him several times, seeking advices from him. He
started courting Bamba and went out dating until latter became his girlfriend. He met Lagman and
Singh thru Bamba. As complainants seeking advice on how to apply for jobs abroad, lest he be
charged as a recruiter, he made Bamba, Lagman and Singh sign separate certifications, all to effect
that he never recruited them and no money was involved. Bamba filed an illegal recruitment case
against him because they quarreled and separated.
RTC rendered judgment finding accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt of illegal
recruitment in large scale.
ISSUE: Illegal Recruitment in a large scale?
HELD: “Recruitment and placement" refers to any act of canvassing, enlisting, contracting,
transporting, utilizing, hiring, or procuring workers, and includes referrals, contract services,
promising or advertising for employment, locally or abroad, whether for profit or not. Provided,
That any person or entity which, in any manner, offers or promises for a fee employment to two or
more persons shall be deemed engaged in recruitment and placement.
Illegal recruitment shall mean any act of canvassing, enlisting, contracting, transporting,
utilizing, hiring, or procuring workers and includes referring, contract services, promising or
advertising for employment abroad, whether for profit or not, when undertaken by a non-licensee
or non-holder of authority. Provided, That any such non-licensee or non-holder who, in any
manner, offers or promises for a fee employment abroad to two or more persons shall be deemed
so engaged.
To prove illegal recruitment in large scale, the prosecution is burdened to prove three (3)
essential elements, to wit: (1) the person charged undertook a recruitment activity under Article
13(b) or any prohibited practice under Article 34 of the Labor Code; (2) accused did not have the
license or the authority to lawfully engage in the recruitment and placement of workers; and (3)
accused committed the same against three or more persons individually or as a group. As gleaned
from the collective testimonies of the complaining witnesses which the trial court and the appellate
court found to be credible and deserving of full probative weight, the prosecution mustered the
requisite quantum of evidence to prove the guilt of accused beyond reasonable doubt for the crime
charged. Indeed, the findings of the trial court, affirmed on appeal by the CA, are conclusive on
this Court absent evidence that the tribunals ignored, misunderstood, or misapplied substantial fact
or other circumstance.
The failure of the prosecution to adduce in evidence any receipt or document signed by
appellant where he acknowledged to have received money and liquor does not free him from
criminal liability. Even in the absence of money or other valuables given as consideration for
the "services" of appellant, the latter is considered as being engaged in recruitment activities.
It can be gleaned from the language of Article 13(b) of the Labor Code
that the act of recruitment may be for profit or not. It is sufficient that the accused promises or
offers for a fee employment to warrant conviction for illegal recruit
CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT
WORKING CONDITIONS & REST PERIODS
iv. Employer’s family members who are dependent on him for support
v. Domestic helpers
house personnel hired by a ranking company official, a foreigner, but paid for by the
company itself, to maintain a staff house provided for the officialregular EE
vi. Persons in the personal service of another
vii. Workers paid by result – per piece/per task
- laborer/EE w/ no fixed salary, wag, or renumeration but receiving a compensation from
his ER an uncertain & variable amount depending upon the work done or the result of
said work (piece work), irrespective of the time employed
EER-EE Relationship – is not dependent upon the agreement of the parties. The characterization
by law prevails over that in the contract. the existence of an EER-EE relshp is not a matter
of stipulation but a question of law
d. depends on the facts of each case
Core/Non-core Jobs
e. EER-EE relship may comver core/non-core activities of the EER’s business.
f. The kind of work is not the definitive test of whether the worker is an EE or not.
Employer – any person, natural or juridical, domestic or foreign, who carries on in the PH any
trade, business, industry, undertaking or activity of any kind and uses the services of another
person who is under his order as regards employment
Employee – any person who performs services for an EER in w/c either or both mental & physical
efforts are used and who receives compensation for such services, where there is an EER-EE
relationship
2. The Economic Dependence Test – observes the need to consider the existing conditions bet the
parties
Evidence of employment
i. id card
ii. vouchers of salaries
iii. sss registration
iv. memorandum
Purpose of 8-hr Labor law – not only to safeguard the health & welfare of the laborer/EE, but in a
way to minimize unemployment by forcing ERs, in cases where more than 8-hr operation is
necessary, to utilize different shifts to laborers/EEs working only for 8 hrs each
Part-time Work – not prohibited. (What the law regulates is work exceeding 8hrs)
GR: Wage & benefits of a part-timer are in proportion to the number of hrs worked.
Resident physicians – customary practice to work for 24 hrs a day violates the limitations in Art
83. when they are under training program/agreement bet the residents and the hospital
accredited by the govt
Hospital EEs – are entitled to a full weekly salary w/ apid 2 days off if they have completed the
40hr/5day workweek (7days pay for 5 days work)
Rest periods of short duration during work hrs shall be counted as hours worked
Pre/Postliminary Activities
j. Preliminary (before work) and postliminary (after actual work) activities are
deemed performed during working hrs, where such activities are
controlled/required by the ER and are pursued necessarily & primarily for the
ER’s benefit
Waiting Time
k. whether waiting time constitutes working time depends on the circumstances on
each particular case
l. controlling factor is WON time spent in idleness is so spent predominantly for
the ER’s benefit or for the EE’s
1. Engaged to Wait – waiting time spent by EE shall be
considered as working time if waiting is considered an integral
part of his work or if the EE is required/engaged by an ER to
wait
2. Waiting to Engage – idle time is not work time
On Call
n. although EE can rest completely and may not be actually at work, if they are
required to be in their place of work before/after the regular working hrs and
w/in the call of their ERs, the time they stay in the place of work sould not be
discounted from their working hrs
o. EE cannot use the time effectively for his own purposes is working while on
call.
p. Not on call: EE is not required to remain on the ER’s premises but is merely
required to leave work at his home or w/ company officials where he may be
reached
q. Public health workers’ On call status – refers to a condition when public health
workers are called upon to respond to urgent or immediate need for
health/medical assistance or relief work during emergencies such that he/she
cannot devote the time for his/her own use.
Travel Time – time spent walking, riding, or traveling to/from place of work
a. Travel from home to work – not worktime when EE receives an emergency call
outside his regular working hrs and is required to travel to his regular place of
business or some other worksiteworking time
b. Travel that is all in a day’s work – time spent by an EE in travel as part of his
principal activityhrs worked
c. Travel away from home – travel that keeps an EE away from home overnight
worktime when it cuts across the EE’s workday
Grievance Meeting – time spent in adjusting grievance bet ER & Ee during the time the EEs are
required by the ER to be on the premiseshrs worked
if a bona fide union is involved depends on the CBA or the custom practice under the
CBA
Note: The 8-hr work period does not include the meal break. EE’s may leave the company
premises as long as they return to their posts on time.
Art 86 NIGHT SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
- at least 10% of his regular wage for each hr of work performed bet 10PM and 6AM
- given as premium for working at a time for sleep & rest
- in addition to the exceptions in Art 82, NSD is n/a to EEs of retail and service
establishments regularly employing 5 employees and below
- if work done from 10pm-6am is OT work, then the 10% night shift differential should be
based on the OT rate
- not waivable (founded on public policy)
- the receipt of OT pay will not preclude payment of NSD pay
- burden of proof of payment of NSD - ER
Overtime Pay – additional compensation for work performed beyond 8hrs w/in the worker’s 24-hr
workday regardless whether the work covers 2 calendar days
Basis – cash wage only, w/o any deduction
Rates
1. OT on a regular work day – at least 25% thereof
2. OT on a holiday or rest day – at least 30% thereof
* CBA may stipulate higher OT pay rate
PAL’s Formula:
monthly salary x 12/365 days in a yr = Basic daily rate
basic daily rate/8 – Basic hourly rate
Proposed Formula:
Monthly salary x 12/actual working days = BDR
BDR/8 = BHR
GR: An express instruction from the ER to the EE to render OT work is not required for the EE to
be entitled to OT pay. It is sufficient that the EE is permitted or suffered to work. Neither is an
express approval by a supervisor needed.
: On rest days & holidays, written authority after office hrs is required for the EE to be entitled to
compensation
A verbal instruction to render OT work prevails over a memorandum prohibiting such
work.
OT claim is not justified for days where no work was required and no work could be done
(i.e. brownout, machine repair, lack of rawmats)
OT Work of Seamen – whether or not the sailors are entitled to OT pay is not whether they were
on board and cannot leave ship beyond the regular 8 working hrs a day, but whether they
actually rendered service in excess of 8 hrs
OT work must be proven by factual & legal basis
Waiver of OT Pay
GR: OT pay cannot be waived expressly or impliedly. Any contrary stipulation is null and void.
Exeptions
1. When the waiver is made in consideration of benefits & privileges w/c may be more than what
will accrue to them in OT pay; and
2. Compressed workweek (CWW)– the number of work days is reduced but the number of work
hrs in a day is increased to more than 8, but no OT pay may be claimed.
Requisites of Compressed Workweek to be valid:
1. The scheme is expressly and voluntarily supported by majority of the EEs affected;
2. In firms using substances, or operating in conditions that are hazardous to health, a
certification is needed from an accredited safety org or the firm’s safety committee that
work beyond 8hrs is w/in the limits/levels of exposure set by DOLE’s occupational safety
& health standards;
3. The DOLE Regional Office is notified.
Illustrations of OT Computations
1. Regular Workdays
Reg Basic Wage + 25% thereof
2. Legal or Regular Holidays
Holiday Wage Rate (200%) + 30% thereof
3. Rest Days or Special Holidays
Rest day/Special Holiday wage rate (130%) + 30% thereof
4. Scheduled Rest Day w/c is also a Special Holiday
Rest day & special holiday wage rate (150%) + 30% thereof
5. Scheduled rest day w/c is also a legal or regular holiday
Rest day & legal holiday wage rate (260%) + 30% thereof
6. Double holiday
Double holiday wage rate (400%) + 30% thereof
EE will receive 200% of his regular daily wage when both regular holidays fall on
the same day and he does not work (Law provides that he shall get his regular
daily wage of each regular holiday)
100% of Araw ng Kagitingan, 100% Good Friday. If he works on that day, he gets
400%
OT pay integrated in Basic Salary – (composite/package pay/all-inclusive salary) – not illegal nor
unusual for executives or managers
But for non-managerial EEs, there must be:
1. A clear written agreement
2. Agreed legal wage rate and OT pay computed separately are equal or higher than the
separate amounts legally due
FLEXIBLE WORK ARRANGEMENTS
- alternative work arrangements or schedules other than the traditional or standard work hrs,
workdays or workweek. ERs may adopt them after due consultation w/ EEs, taking into
acct the adverse consequence of the situation on the performance and financial condition
of the company.
- Its effectivity and implementation shall be temporary.
- Should be threshed out by the ER and EE
- DOLE Reg Ofc must be notified prior to implementation
- In addition to CWW, the FWAs include:
1. Reduction of workdays – where normal workdays per week are reduced but
should not last for more than 6 months
2. Rotation of workers – where the EEs are rotated/alternately provided work w/in
the workweek
3. Forced leave – EEs are required to go on leave for several days or weeks,
utilizing their leave credits if there are any
4. Broken-time schedule – the work schedule is not continuous but the number of
hrs w/in the day or week is not reduced
5. Flexi-holiday schedule – Ees agree to avail themselves of the holidays at some
other days, provided that there is no diminution of existing benefits as a result of
such arrangement
Premium pay or Differential compensation – addtl compensation for work rendered by the EE on
days when normally he should not be working such as special holidays and weekly rest days
Note: This article does not prohibit a CBA stipulation for higher benefits
Double Holiday Pay (Araw ng Kagitingan & Good Friday on the same day)
1. 200% of the basic wage
a. entitled even if said holiday is unworked
b. to give EE only 100% would reduce the number of holidays under the law
2. 400% if he worked on 2 regular holidays falling on the same day
3. 520% if he worked on 2 regular holidays falling on the same day and at the same time
falling on a scheduled rest day
EEs w/ salaries above Min Wage: the difference bet the min wage and the actual salary received
by the EEs cannot be deemed as their 13th month pay and SIL pay
SIL VL/SL
Mandatory Art 95 Voluntary grant (ER’s policy
or CBA)
Intended to alleviate the Intended to afford a laborer a
economic condition of the chance to get a much needed
workers for it acts as rest to replenish his energy
replacement for regular and renew his efficiency
income that would not be
earned during such instance
Cannot be waived Must be demanded in its
opportune time; silence is
waiver
Commutable Not commutable
Pooled Tips
- where an establishment does not collect service charges but has a practice/policy of pooling tips
given voluntarily by its customers, the pooled tips should be monitored, accounted for and
distributed in the same manner as the service charges
Title 2 WAGES
Ch 1
Art 97. Definitions
Person – an individual, partnership, assoc, corp, business trust, legal rep, or any organized group
of persons
Employer – any person acting directly/indirectly in the interest of an ER in relation to an EE &
shall include the Govt & all its branches, subd, & instrumentalities, all govt-owned/-controlled
corps & institutions, as well as non-profit private institutions/orgs.
Employee - any indiv employed by an ER
Agriculture – includes farming in all its branches, and among other things, includes the cultivation
& tillage of soil, dairying, the production, cultivation, growing & harvesting of any agricultural
& horticultural commodities, the raising of livestock or poultry, and any practices performed
by a famer on a farm as an incident to or in conjunction with such farming operations, but does
not include the manufacturing or processing of sugar, coconuts, abaca, tobacco, pineapples or
other farm products.
Employ – includes to suffer or permit to work
Wage – paid to any EE; shall mean the renumeration or earnings, however designated, capable of
being expressed in terms of money, whether fixed or ascertained on a time, task, piece, or
commission basis, or other method of calculating the same, w/c is payable by and ER to an EE
under a written/unwritten contract of ENT for work done or to be done, or for services
rendered and includes the fair and reasonable value, as determined by the Sec of Labor, of
board, lodging, or other facilities customarily furnished by the ER ro the EE.
Includes commissions – the recompense compensation/reward of an agent, salesman,
executor, trustee, receiver, factor, broker or bailee, when the same is calculated as a
percentage on the amt of his transactions or on the profit of the principal
Sonco v NLRC: Zuelig was made to pay the terminated EE (due to retrenchment),
separation pay based not only on the basic salary, but also on the commissions,
transpo & emergency living allowances.
Even if commissions were in the form of incentives or encouragement, still these
commissions are direct renumerations for services rendered w/c contributed to the
increase of income of the ER. The nature of work of a salesman & the reason for such
type of renumeration for services rendered demonstrate that commissions are part of
their wage or salary. (Some salesmen do not receive any basic salary but depend on
commissions & allowances or commissions alone, although an EE-ER relationship
exists).
Includes facilities or commodities – fair & reasonable value of board, lodging, or other
facilities customarily furnished by the ER to the EE.
An ER may provide, for instance, food & housing to his EEs but he may deduct their
values from the EES’ wages to be determined by the Sec of Labor.
Snacks
70% - deducted from wages (must be authorized in writing)
30% - subsidized by the ER
Fair rental value -shall be the reasonable cost of the operation & maintenance.
Rate of depreciation & depreciated amt – those arrived at under good accounting
practices
Good accounting practices – shall NOT include accounting practices w/c have been
rejected by the BIR for IT purposes
In order that the cost of facilities furnished by the ER may be charged against an EE,
his acceptance of such facilities must be voluntary
Excludes allowances -
Fair & reasonable value – shall NOT include any profit to the ER or to any person affiliated w/ the
ER
WAGES SALARY
Compensation for manual Denotes a higher degree of
labor, skilled/unskilled, paid ENT, or a superior grade of
at stated times, and measured services, and implies a
by the day, week, month, or position or office
season
Indicates considerable pay for Suggestive of a larger and
a lower and less responsible more permanent or fixed
character of ENT compensation for more
important service
Has a less extensive meaning Compensation of clerks,
than salary; being ordinarily officers of pub corps, and pub
restricted to sums paid as hire offices
or reward to domestic or
menial servants and to sums
paid to artisans, mechanics,
laborers, and other EEs of
like class
In many situations, however, and as the SC states, they are in
essence synonymous
FACILITIES SUPPLEMENTS
Include articles or services
for the benefit of the EE or
his family but shall NOT
include tools of the trade or
articles or service primarily
for the benefit of the ER or
necessary to the conduct of
the ER’s business
Wage-deductible Not wage-deductible
Benefit/privilege part of the Benefit/privilege given to the
laborer’s basic wages, EE w/c constitutes an extra
renumeration above & over
his basic or ordinary earning
or wage
The distinction bet a facility & a supplement is in the purpose,
(not the kind) of the item.
State Marine Corp & Royal Line, Inc. v Cebu Seamen’s Assoc, inc: The vessel crew were
provided w/ free meals by the ship owners (petitioner), not part of their wages but as a
necessary matter in the maintenance of the health & efficiency of the crew during the voyage.
They should not be deducted from their wages. The deductions should be returned to them.
Atok-Big Wedge Assoc v Atok-Big Wedge: Supplements constitute extra renumeration or
special privileges or wages, while facilities on the other hand, are items of expense necessary
for the laborer’s & his family’s existence & substinence, so that by express provision of law,
they form part of the wage and when furnished by the ER are deductible therefrom, since if
they are not so furnished, the laborer would spend and pay for them just the same.
Mabeza v NLRC: The ER failed to meet any of the requirements. More significantly, the food &
lodging or the electricity & water consumed by the EE were not facilities, but supplements.
Hotel workers are required to work different shifts and are expected to be available at various
odd hours, their ready availability is a necessary matter in the operations of respondent’s hotel.
Gratuity - Given freely or w/o recompense; a gift; something voluntarily given in return for a favor
or services; a bounty; a tip.
- gratuity pay is not intended to pay a worker for actual services rendered. It is a money
benefit given to the workers whose purpose is “to reward EEs who have rendered
satisfactory & efficient service to the company.”
- Not mandatory & not part of labor standard law
“A fair day’s wage for fair day’s labor.” – if there is no work performed by the EE, there can be
no wage or pay unless the laborer was able, willing and ready to work but was prevented by
the mgt or was illegally locked out, suspended or dismissed.
“Equal pay for equal work.” – EEs working in the PH, if they are performing similar functions &
responsibilities under similar working conditions, should be paid under the principle of “equal
pay for equal work.
International School Alliance of Educators v Quisumbing: IS hires as members of the
faculty, 1)foreign-hires and 2) local-hires. The school grants foreign-hires salary of 25% more
than that of local-hires due to a) the dislocation factor, and b) limited tenure. SC: If an ER
accords EEs the same position & rank, the presumption is that these EEs perform equal work.
There is no showing that foreign-hires perform 25% more efficiently or effectively than the
local-hires. Both groups have similar functions & responsibilities w/c they perform under
similar working conditions. The “dislocation factor” and “limited tenure” cannot serve as valid
bases for the distinction in salary rates, and are adequately compensated by certain benefits
accorded them w/c are not enjoyed by local-hires (housing, transpo, shipping, taxes, home
leave allowance).
Agricultural Activities
Preparation of the soil, planting of ramie stalks and transporting them to the stripping
sheds, stripping the fibers w/ the use of decorticating machines run by electricity,
drying the wet fibers, passing them through the brusher to cleanse them of impurities
and baling the fiers for the market
Planting & harvesting sugar cane & other chores incidental to ordinary farming
operations
Tillage of the soil, raising of crops including discovery of plant pests and their
eradication by means of insecticides
Fishpond business
farmhands employed to cultivate the vegetable garden of a non-agricultural corp are
not agricultural workers
Art 99. The minimum wage rates for agricultural and non-agricultural EEs and workers in
each and every region of the country shall be those prescribed by the Regional Tripartite
Wages and Productivity Boards
Statutory Minimum Wage – the lowest wage rate fixed by law that an ER can pay his workers.
Compensation w/c is less than such minimum rate is considered an underpayment that violates
the law.
- determined for each region by the regional wage boards
- provided w/ margin to take care of contingencies, such as increase of prices of
commodities and increase in wants and to provide means for a desirable improvement in
EE’s mode of living (A person’s needs increase as his means increase.)
Effects:
1. benefits all wage earners by setting a floor below w/c their pay cannot fall
2. raises the standard of competition among ERs, since it would protect the fair-minded
ER from the competition of the ER who pays his workers a wage below subsistence;
3. is a prereq to the adoption of the SSS, w/c requires contributions from EEs themselves
Ability to pay immaterial
- ER cannot exempt himself from liability to pay minimum wages because of poor financial
condition of the company
- Lack of funds is not a valid defense because the payment of minimum wage is a
mandatory statutory obligation
EEs not estopped to sue for difference in amount of wages
- the acceptance by an EE of the wages paid him w/o objection does not give rise to estoppel
precluding him from suing for the difference bet the amt received and the amt he should have
received pursuant to a valid minimum wage law
Exemptions to the coverage of the Rule on minimum wages
1. Household or domestic helpers, including family drivers and persons in the personal
service of another;
2. Homeworkers engaged in needle-work;
3. Workers employed in any establishment duly registered w/ the National Cottage
Industries and Devt Authority in accordance w/ RA 3470 provided that such workers
perform the work in their respective homes;
4. Workers in any duly registered cooperative when so recommended by the Bureau of
Cooperative Devt and upon approval by the Sec of DOLE, provided however, that such
recommendation shall be given only for the purpose of making the cooperative viable and
upon finding and certification of said Bureau supported by adequate proof, that the
cooperative cannot resort to other remedial measures w/o serious loss or prejudice to its
operation except through its exemption from the requirements of the Rules. The
exemption shall be subj to such terms & conditions and for such period of time as the Sec
of Labor may prescribe.
5. Barangay Micro Business Enterprises (BMBE) (under RA 9178/BMBE Law), provided
that all EEs covered under this Act shall be entitled to the same benefits given to any
regular EE such as social security and health care benefits. BMBEs are also exempt from
income tax.
So that the rule against diminution of supplements/benefits may apply, it must be shown that:
1. The grant of the benefit is founded on a policy or has ripened into a practice over a long
period;
2. The practice is consistent and deliberate;
3. The practice is not due to error in the construction or application of a doubtful or difficult
question of law; and
4. The diminution or discontinuance is done unilaterally by the ER.
Food/Meal Allowance
Cebu Autobus Co v United Cebu Autobus EEs Assoc: the company used to pay its drivers
and conductors, aside from their regular salary, a certain percentage of their daily wage,
as allowance for food. Discontinued by ER upon effectivity of Minimum Wage Law.
CIR:
company practice
Nonconributory Retirement Plan
Nestle PH Inc. v NLRC: The fact that the retirement plan is noncontributory, does not
make it a nonissue in the CBA negotiations. The EEs have a vested right over the
existing benefits voluntarily granted to them by their ER. The latter may not unilaterally
withdraw, eliminate or diminish such benefits.
Monthly Emergency Allowance
R. Tiangco & V. Tiangco v Hon. Leogardo: ERs, fishing operator and fishbroker,
discontinued paying the batillos (who work by unloading the fish from the vessels
dependent on arrival of the vessels, hence they work only a few days a month averaging
4 hrs a day) a fixed monthly emergency allowance (which they had been paid as a
matter of practice/verbal agreement) illegal.
Full 13th month pay
Arco Metal Products v Samahan ng Manggagawa: ER cannot shrink away from its
responsibility by merely claiming that its acts of giving full 13th month pay to EEs who
have not worked for the full year is a mistake. It has become practice.
Pag-asa Steel Works v CA: To ripen into a company practice that is demandable as a
matter of right, the giving of the increase should not only be by reason of a strict legal (as
Wage Order) or contractual oblig (CBA), but by reason of an act of liberality on the part of
the ER.
Benefit on Reimbursement Basis –
o Per diem allowance – a daily allowance given for each day when an EE is away
from his home base; intended to cover their cost of lodging & subsistence when
on duty outside of their permanent stationif the EE did not leave his
permanent station and spent nothing for meals & lodging outside thereof, then he
is not entitled to per diem as there is nothing to be reimbursed
o Monthly ration of gas given to certain managerial EEs is not part of their basic
salary. its temporary revocation does not constitute a diminution of the EE’s
fringe benefits.
o The elimination of an existing benefit in exchange for an equal or better one
does not violate Art 100.
Reclassification of Position; Promotion
o from rank-and-file to supervisory - the position holders lose OT pay and other
benefits but Art 100 is not violated.
But, promotion & position reclassification must be done in GF.
National Sugar Refineries Corp v NLRS & NBSR Union: ER implemented a Job
Evaluation program affecting all EEs. Respondents were reclassified from rank-and-file to
supervisory/managerial positions. Because of that, they lost their OT, rest day & holiday pay
but it was also shown that they received upward adjustments in basic pay & allowances. SC:
This reclassification is in essence a promotion w/c is one of the jurisprudentially recognized
exclusive prerogatives of mgt, provided in is done in GF. Union failed to prove BF on the part
of the ER.
Promotion – the advancement from one position to another with an increase in duties &
responsibilities as authorized by law and usually accompanied by an increase in salary
If the bonus was included in or considered as the equivalent of the 13thMP, there would be no
need for a specific provision of such bonus in the CBA. But if the CBA did provide for a
bonus in graduated amts depending on the length of service, for example, the intention is clear
that the bonus provided in the CBA was meant to be in addition to the legal requirement of
13thMP.
13thMP – deemed incorporated in the CBA, employment contract. The absence of an express
provision obligating the ER to pay 13thMP to the EEs is immaterial
Ph Duplicators Inc v NLRC: the sales commission earned by the sales men
constitute part of their compensation, considering that the ER pays them a small
fixed/guaranteed wage; the greater part being composed of the sales/incentive
commissions earned on actual sales closed by them
Sales commissions – are intimately related or directly proportional to the extent or energy
of an EE’s endeavors; paid upon the specific results achieved by a salesman-EE; it is a
percentage of the sales closed by a salesman & operates as an integral part of such
salesman’s bsic pay.
2. If they are NOT integral part of the basic salary, then they shld be excluded.
Boie-Takeda Case: the commissions paid to medreps were excluded from the term
“basic salary” because these were paid to them as “productivity bonuses”. They are
generally tied to the productivity or capacity for revenue production of a corp; such
bonuses closely resemble profit-sharing payments and have no clear direct or
necessary relation to the amt of work actually done by each indiv EE.
The commissions pd by Boie to its medreps could not have been sales
commissions. Medreps are not salesmen; they do not effect any sale of any article at
all. They are EEs engaged in the promotion of pharmaceutical products or med
devices manufactured by their ER. They promote such products by visiting identified
physicians & inform such physicians orally/w/ the aid of brochures, of the existence &
chem composition of the pharma product. The addt’s payments given to them were
not in fact commissions but rather in the nature of profit-sharing bonuses.
Ph Agricultural Commercial & Industrial Workers Union v NLRC: the bus drivers &
conductors of respondent transic co. (allegedly paid on purely commission basis) are entitled to
13thMP on both their fixed & guaranteed wage and commission
in the case of a bus conductor paid on commission only as supported by his pay slips w/c
indicated the varying amount of commissions he received each trip not included in 13THMP
Proportionate 13thMP
- an EE who has resigned or was dismissed at any time before the time for payment of the
13thMP is entitled to this monetary benefit in proportion to the length of time he worked
during the year. unless otherwise stipulated in the CBA
Distressed Employer – exempted from paying 13thMP upon prior authorization from the Sec of
DOLE
Difference of opinion in the computation of 13thMP is a nonstrikeable issue. a strike held on this
ground is illegal.
Workers paid by results – workers whose pay is calculated not on the basis of time spent on the job
but of the quantity & quality or the kind of work they turn out. (nontime work).
- stress is placed on the unit of work produced or the quantity thereof
- a uniform amount is paid per unit accomplished
B. As to Rate of Payment
1. Those who are paid piece rates w/c are prescribed in Piece Rate Orders issued by DOLE
# of pieces x rate per pc
- these workers are not covered by the Rule on Hours of Work (no premium & OT pay)
2. Those who are paid output rates w/c are prescribed by the ER and are not yet approved by
the DOLE.
a.) If the resulting amt is than the statutory min daily rate in rel to the # of hrs
worked, the worker will rcv such amt.
b.) BUT, if the amt is less than the applicable legal rate, it is possible that the rates
per pc are not in accordance w/ the standards. In that case, the ER is required by
law to pay the difference.
Entitlement to 13thMP
GR: PD 851 exempts from payment of 13thMP ERs of those who are paid a fixed amt for
performing specific work, irrespective of time consumed in the perf thereof,
except where the workers are paid on piece-work basis (those who are paid a standard amt for
every pc/unit of work produced that is more/less regularly replicated, w/o regard to the time
spent in producing the same) in w/c case the ER shall grant the 13thMP to such EEs.
The piece-rate worker should have rendered at least 1 month work/service during the calendar yr.
GR:
1. At least once every 2 weeks; or
2. Twice a month at intervals not exceeding 16 days.
:
1.In case of force majeure or other circs beyond the ER’s control, payment must be made
immediately after such occurrence has ceased.
2. If engaged to perform a task w/c cannot be completed in 2 weeks and in the absence of
CBA or arbitration award:
a. Payment shall be made at intervals not exceeding 16 days, in proportion to the
amt of work completed;
b. That final settlement is made upon completion of work.
Art 104. PLACE OF PAYMENT
GR: At or near the place of undertaking
:
1.
When payment cannot be effected at or near the place of work by reason of deterioration
of peace & order conditions, or by reason of actual or impending emergencies caused by
fire, flood or other calamity rendering paymt thereat impossible;
2. When the ER provides for free transpo to the EEs back and forth; and
3. Under any other analogous circs.
Prohibition: No ER shall pay his EEs in a bar, night or day club, drinking establishment, massage
clinic, dance hall or other similar places or in places where games are played w/ stakes of
money or thins representing money except in the case of persons employed in such places.
Procedure
1) Claimants shall execute an affidavit attesting their relshp to the deceased and the
fact that they are his heirs, to the exclusion of all others (Affidavit of Next of
Kin);
2) In case of a minor heir, affidavit shall be executed on his behalf by his natural
guardian or next of kin;
3) Affidavit shall be presented to the ER who shall make paymt through the Sec of
Labor or his rep;
4) The rep shall act as referee in dividing the amt paid among the heirs; and
5) Payment of wages under this Art shall absolve the ER of any further liability w/
respect to the amt paid.
3. Payment through a family member of the workers family
- where the ER is authorized in writing by the EE to pay his wages to a member of his family
Labor-only contracting is wrong & prohibited bcoz it is an attempt to evade the obligs of an EEr:
a) To respect EE’s R to unionize;
b) R to ENT standards;
c) R to security of tenure
Substantial capital – capital stocks and subscribed capitalization in the case of corps, tools,
equipment, implements, machineries and work premises, actually & directly used by the
sub/contractor in the performance or completion of the job, work or service contracted out.
- the law does not require both substantial capital and investment in the form of tools,
equipment, machineries, etc.
Right to control – refers to the right reserved to the person for whom the service of the contractual
workers are performed, to determine not only the end to be achieved, but also the manner &
means to be used in reaching that end
Insular life v NLRC: “exclusive servicing” esp springing from a regulation issued by the
Insurance Commission, and not from an intention by the alleged ER, does not necessarily mean
being under the control or ENT of the entity being served. The relship may still be classified as
independent contractorship because the element of control is absent.
- EEs may resign from their jobs to become contractors to their former ER, but
the latter should cease controlling the means & method of doing the work allegedly contracted,
otherwise, the result is LOC.
Note: The principal shall be deemed the ER of the contractual EE in any of the ff cases as declared
by competent authority:
1. Labor-only contracting; and
2. Contracting arrangement falling w/in the prohibitions
Art 107. INDIRECT ER – any person, partnership, assoc or corp w/c not being n ER, contracts
w/ an independent contractor for the perf of any work, task, job or proj.
A manpower company may be a LOC in one case but an independent contractor in another.
Coca-cola Bottlers Ph v Hingpit: Lipercon was adjudged to be a LOC in a previous
case (Guarin v Lipercon), for lacking the substantial capital. But not so in the present case, where
it has been able to establish its characted as an independent contractor. Aside form hiring its own
EEs and paying the workers their salaries, it also exercised supervision & control over them, w/c is
the most important aspect in determining ER-EE Relshp.
The existence of ER-EE Relshp is a precondition to entitlement to labor standards & labor relatios
Rs.
2. a) Reimbursement – the joint & several liability of the contractor & the principal
under Arts 106, 107 & 109 of the LC is mandated to assure compliance of the
provisions including the statutory min wage. The contractor is made liable by virtue of
his status as the direct ER; and the principal is made the indirect ER of the
contractor’s EEs for purposes of paying the EEs their wages should the contractor fail
to do so.
- where no ER-EE Relshp exists bet the parties, as to reimbursement
bet the principal & the contractor, the RTC has jurisdiction
b) Payment before Reimbursement – but one may seek reimbursement only AFTER it
has paid the EEs.
c) For Other Violations – qualified or limited liability; if the liability is for failure to
pay the min wage, or the SIL, or other benefits derived from or provided for by law,
the principal is equally liable w/ the contractor as if the principal were the direct ER.
BUT, if the liability is invested w/ punitive character, such as an award for
backwages & separation pay because of an illegal dismissal of the contractor’s EE, the
liability should be solely that of the contractor in absence of proof that the principal
conspired w/ the contractor in the commission of the illegal dismissal.
Security of Tenure:
a. in cases of termination of ENT prior to the expiration of the contract bet the principal &
the sub/contractor, the R of the contractual EE to separation pay or other related benefits
shall be governed by applicable laws & jurisprudence on termination of ENT.
b. Where the termination results from expiration of contract bet the principal & the
contractor, or from completion of the phase of the job for w/c the EE is engaged not
entitled to separation pay. however, this shall be w/o prejudice to completion bonuses
or other emoluments, incl retirement pay as may be provided by law/contract bet the
principal & the contractor.
Effect of Nonregistration:
GR: The absence of registration gives rise to the presumption that the contractor is engaged in
LOC,
But, if the contractor directly supervises the workers & imposes disciplinary action, he qualifies
as a legit contractor despite nonregistration w/ DOLE.
Conditions:
1. Formal declaration of insolvency or bankruptcy;
2. General judicial liquidation proceedings of the ER’s business; and
3. Filing of claims by workers.