Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

    • 348 views

    Assessment Rubric Writer's Effects

    Uploaded by

    nellytusiime
    Assessment Rubric Writers' Effect

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Assessment Rubric Writer's Effects

    Uploaded by

    nellytusiime
    348 views1 page
    Assessment Rubric Writers' Effect

    Original Title

    ASSESSMENT RUBRIC WRITER'S EFFECTS

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Assessment Rubric Writers' Effect

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    348 views1 page

    Assessment Rubric Writer's Effects

    Uploaded by

    nellytusiime
    Assessment Rubric Writers' Effect

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    0500/01 Cambridge IGCSE – Mark Scheme For examination

    SPECIMEN from 2020

    Marking Criteria for Question 2(d)

    Table A, Reading: Analysing how writers achieve effects

    Use the following table to give a mark out of 15 for Reading.

    Level Marks Description


    5 13–15 • Wide-ranging discussion of judiciously selected language with some high
    quality comments that add meaning and associations to words/phrases in
    both parts of the text, and demonstrate the writer’s reasons for using them.
    • Tackles imagery with some precision and imagination.
    • There is clear evidence that the candidate understands how language works.
    4 10–12 • Explanations are given of carefully selected words and phrases.
    • Explanations of meanings within the context of the text are secure and
    effects are identified in both parts of the text.
    • Images are recognised as such and the response goes some way to
    explaining them.
    • There is some evidence that the candidate understands how language
    works.
    3 7–9 • A satisfactory attempt is made to select appropriate words and phrases.
    • The response mostly gives meanings of words and any attempt to suggest
    and explain effects is basic or very general.
    • One half of the text may be better addressed than the other.
    2 4–6 • The response provides a mixture of appropriate choices and words that
    communicate less well.
    • The response may correctly identify linguistic devices but not explain why
    they are used.
    • Explanations may be few, general, slight or only partially effective.
    • They may repeat the language of the original or do not refer to specific
    words.
    1 1–3 • The choice of words is sparse or rarely relevant.
    • Any comments are inappropriate and the response is very thin.
    0 0 • The response does not relate to the question.
    • Inappropriate words and phrases are chosen or none are selected.

    © UCLES 2017 Page 15 of 20

    You might also like