Burnout, Fatigue and Stress Factors in Solo Entrepreneurs
Burnout, Fatigue and Stress Factors in Solo Entrepreneurs
Burnout, Fatigue and Stress Factors in Solo Entrepreneurs
BURNOUT,
FATIGUE
AND
STRESS
FACTORS
IN
SOLO
ENTREPRENEURS
A
Thesis
submitted
in
partial
satisfaction
of
the
requirements
of
the
Postgraduate
Degree
in
Master
of
Business
Administration
by
Suzanne
Jade
Barclay
June
2015
Executive
Summary
Burnout
can
be
devastating
to
individuals
and
organisations,
and
is
often
not
recognised
until
it
has
already
caused
physical,
mental
and
financial
damage
(Maslach
and
Lieter
1997;
Cordes
and
Dougherty
1993;
Maslach
and
Goldberg
1998;
Leiter
et
al.
2014).
Since
the
1970s,
the
majority
of
academic
research
into
burnout
has
studied
employees
who
work
closely
with
people
in
helping
professions,
such
as
nurses
or
teachers
(Ashkar
et
al.
2010;
Calnan
et
al.
2011;
Whitebird
et
al.
2013;
Maslach
1982).
As
more
and
more
people
have
the
opportunity
or
obligation
to
work
for
themselves
in
recent
years
(Arum
and
Müller
2004),
the
lack
of
entrepreneur-‐specific
research
in
the
literature
implies
that
employee
burnout
is
to
be
treated
the
same
as
solo
entrepreneur
burnout.
However,
personal
accounts
from
solo
entrepreneurs
and
mainstream
entrepreneurial
publications
imply
otherwise
(Robinson
2011;
Hughes
2011;
Seegal
2012;
Smbeco.com
2012).
The
purpose
of
this
research
project
is
to
investigate
the
unique
impact
and
experience
of
burnout
and
fatigue
on
solo
entrepreneurs,
with
a
view
to
identifying
common
themes
and
practical
prevention
and
management
strategies.
This
research
involved
conducting
surveys
and
non-‐directive
in-‐depth
interviews
with
respondents
about
their
experiences
with
burnout
and
fatigue
throughout
their
career,
both
as
a
solo
entrepreneur
and
as
an
employee.
The
literature
shows
that
employees
experience
three
dimensions
of
employee
burnout:
emotional
exhaustion,
depersonalisation,
and
diminished
sense
of
personal
accomplishment.
Unique
themes
emerged
in
this
study
showing
that
employees
and
solo
entrepreneurs
experience
their
work
differently
and,
as
such,
experience
burnout
very
differently.
This
studied
revealed
that
solo
entrepreneurs
experience
three
very
different
types
of
burnout:
physical
breakdown
(body),
mental
exhaustion
(brain),
and
lack
of
challenge
(boredom).
Once
one
is
aware
of
these
types
of
burnout,
prevention
and
early
intervention
is
possible
as
each
type
can
each
be
recognised
and
managed
appropriately.
BOREDOM
Awareness
is
the
first
step.
(Many
entrepreneurs
12.5%
1. Introduction
Burnout
and
fatigue
affect
not
just
work
performance,
but
can
lead
to
long-‐term
health,
relational
and
financial
problems
(Maslach
and
Lieter
1997;
Leiter
and
Maslach
2005;
Leiter
et
al.
2014).
This
research
focuses
on
exploring
burnout,
fatigue
and
stress
factors
as
experienced
by
solo
entrepreneurs,
and
draws
on
academic
literature
about
burnout
in
the
workplace
and
a
mainstream
texts
that
target
the
entrepreneurship
market.
The
purpose
of
this
research
is
to
gain
insights
into
the
factors
that
surround
burnout
and
fatigue
in
solo
entrepreneurs,
and
to
make
recommendations
for
practice,
and
identify
common
themes
and
practical
measures
that
can
be
used
to
prevent
and
reverse
burnout.
Burnout
research,
pioneered
by
Christine
Maslach
PhD
in
the
1970s,
focuses
on
exploring
how
working
closely
with
people
can
lead
to
burnout
(Maslach
and
Lieter
1997;
Maslach
and
Goldberg
1998;
Maslach
1982).
Research
has
typically
been
conducted
in
employee
populations
with
employees
who
work
closely
with
people,
such
as
nurses,
educators,
and
psychotherapists
(Ashkar
et
al.
2010;
Calnan
et
al.
2011;
Whitebird
et
al.
2013;
Cordes
and
Dougherty
1993;
Maslach
1982).
Burnout
and
compassion
fatigue
research
has
been
crucial
in
establishing
supportive
procedures
and
policies
in
the
workplace
to
enable
sustainable
health
and
performance
outcomes
for
employees
(ibid.).
As
more
people
turn
to
solo
entrepreneurship
as
a
viable
work
option,
there
seems
to
be
an
unspoken
assumption
in
the
field
that
burnout
findings
for
employees
hold
equally
true
for
entrepreneurs.
While
it
is
well
recognised
than
stress
and
burnout
are
inevitable
by-‐products
of
entrepreneurship,
almost
no
literature
is
available
in
this
area,
which
has
been
largely
ignored
by
scholars
and
researchers
(Shepherd
et
al.
2010).
In
recent
years
there
has
been
frequent
coverage
of
entrepreneurial
burnout
and
entrepreneurial
mental
health
in
mainstream
publications
(Carson
2015;
Ellsberg
2014;
Ferriss
2008;
Hoehn
2014;
Bruder
2014)
An
assumption
has
been
repeatedly
stated
that
isolation
and
overload
are
common
problems
for
entrepreneurs
(Sydney
Morning
Herald
2011;
Smbeco.com
2012;
Kraft
2006;
Robinson
2011;
Gray
2015).
Despite
this,
a
gap
has
been
identified
in
the
academic
literature
relating
to
stress
and
burnout
in
entrepreneurs
and
in
people
who
work
alone
(Shepherd
et
al
2010;
Grant
and
Ferris
2009).
In
particular,
this
research
project
explores
burnout
among
solo
entrepreneurs
and
identifies
practical
intervention
and
prevention
factors
that
could
increase
productivity
and
health
for
solo
entrepreneurs.
Surveys
and
in-‐depth
phenomenological
interviews
were
conducted
with
solo
entrepreneurs
about
their
experiences
with
burnout
and
fatigue
throughout
their
career,
both
as
a
solo
entrepreneur
and
as
an
employee.
These
interviews
were
exploratory
and
non-‐directive,
allowing
core
themes
to
emerge
from
the
respondents’
own
words
without
introducing
any
typical
burnout-‐related
jargon
or
predictive
categorisation.
Employees
and
solo
entrepreneurs
experience
their
work
differently
and
experience
burnout
differently.
As
entrepreneurs,
the
majority
of
respondents
described
“never
switching
off”
and
no
longer
being
able
to
stop
thinking
about
work
after
5pm
like
they
could
as
employees.
For
some,
this
affected
their
sleep,
or
their
relationships.
Counter-‐
intuitively,
most
respondents
felt
more
isolated
when
surrounded
by
people
in
their
former
jobs
than
they
did
working
for
themselves,
and
chose
to
go
solo
to
gain
a
greater
sense
of
control
over
their
time
and
meaning
in
their
work.
Rather
than
the
lack
of
control
experienced
by
burnt
out
employees,
solo
entrepreneurs
described
having
full
control
over
what
they
do
and
how
and
when
they
do
it.
As
such,
rather
than
the
three
burnout
dimensions
as
measured
by
Maslach’s
Burnout
Inventory
–
exhaustion,
cynicism,
and
professional
efficacy
–
which
has
been
validated
for
numerous
employee
occupations
(Maslach
1981;
Maslach
and
Jackson
1981;
Langballe
et
al.
2006),
solo
entrepreneurs
experience
three
very
different
versions
of
burnout:
physical
body
breakdown,
mental
exhaustion,
and
lack
of
challenge,
each
of
which
can
be
specifically
recognised
and
managed.
Five
sections
follow
in
this
report.
Firstly,
a
brief
review
of
existing
literature,
then
data
collection
and
analysis.
The
key
findings
are
extracted
in
the
third
section,
followed
by
key
implications
for
solo
entrepreneurs,
recommendations
for
practice,
and
suggestions
for
future
research.
2. Orientation
A
recent
study
revealed
a
seven
times
higher
rate
of
mental
health
issues
to
entrepreneurs
(49%)
than
the
general
population
(7%)
(Carson
2015).
The
same
study
showed
that
72%
of
entrepreneurs
reported
having
mental
health
problems
in
themselves
or
their
immediate
family
(ibid.).
Stress,
burnout
and
mental
health
issues
are
intertwined
for
entrepreneurs,
despite
being
largely
understudied
topics
in
this
population
(Shepherd
et
al.
2010).
Entrepreneurs
engage
with
work
differently
than
their
employee
counterparts.
Despite
frequent
references
in
mainstream
press
to
stress
and
mental
health
risks
associated
with
burnout
in
the
life
of
an
entrepreneur,
there
has
been
very
little
academic
research
to
support
this
claim
(Carson
2015;
Ellsberg
2014;
Hoehn
2014;
Bruder
2014;
Seegal
2012;
Robinson
2011;
Hughes
2011;
Ferriss
2008).
Academic
burnout
research
conducted
on
employee
populations,
adopted
by
authors
in
mainstream
media,
has
been
assumed
to
be
applicable
to
the
entrepreneurial
experience.
However,
usual
measures
of
occupational
stress
and
job
burnout
do
not
effectively
translate
to
entrepreneurs
(Shepherd
et
al.
2010;
Grant
and
Ferris
2009).
This
research
takes
a
look
behind
these
unspoken
assumptions.
It
is
generally
accepted
that
there
is
not
one
single
definition
that
encapsulates
entrepreneurship
(Kuratko,
2014;
Spinelli
and
Adams
2012).
The
word
originated
from
the
French
entrependre
meaning
“to
undertake”
and
has
also
been
described
as
“a
journey
of
promise”
(Kuratko
2014;
Hamilton
2009).
The
literature
includes
three
characteristics
that
separate
an
entrepreneur
from
a
small
business
owner.
A
small
business
is
generally
viewed
as
a
going
concern
that
is
managed
without
much
focus
on
change
or
growth.
An
entrepreneurial
venture,
in
contrast,
involves
pursuing
rapid
yet
sustainable
growth,
immediate
profits,
and
accepting
responsibility
for
a
certain
level
of
risk
(Kuratko
2014;
Spinelli
and
Adams
2012).
While
entrepreneurs
may
acquire
funding
and
assemble
a
team
to
enable
the
growth
they
seek,
it
is
the
pursuit
of
growth
and
assumption
of
risk
that
defines
entrepreneurship,
not
the
means
by
which
that
growth
is
attained.
The
literature
reflects
an
assumption
that
entrepreneurship
is
driven
by
combining
opportunity
and
individual
skills
(Kuratko
2014;
Shane
2003).
However,
solo
entrepreneurs
describe
a
necessary
dimension
of
having
control
over
one’s
schedule
and
meaningfulness
in
one’s
work,
which
aligns
more
with
Daniel
Pink’s
(2009)
inner
motivational
model
of
autonomy,
mastery
and
purpose.
Entrepreneurs
typically
gain
experience
as
employees
before
beginning
their
own
ventures.
Solo
entrepreneurship
has
become
mentioned
more
and
more
in
mainstream
literature
and
a
little
in
academic
literature.
A
solo
entrepreneur
is
defined
as
an
entrepreneur
with
no
employees
(Wasdani
and
Mathew
2014).
Solo
entrepreneurs
include
freelancers
selling
their
own
services,
owners
of
agencies
of
contractors,
or
individuals
who
grow
their
business
by
expanding
their
product
line
and
distribution
channels.
Solo
entrepreneurs
may
use
investment
capital
to
start
or
grow
their
venture,
assume
risk,
and
focus
on
growth
and
profit,
while
deliberately
not
taking
on
employees
(ibid.).
Of
the
1.8
million
small
businesses
in
Australia,
and
most
of
them
are
home-‐based
(Switzer
2007).
48.6%
of
all
firms
in
Australia
and
22
million
firms
in
the
USA
are
reported
to
be
solo
entrepreneurs
or
“non-‐employer
businesses”,
with
combined
receipts
of
over
$950
billion
in
the
American
businesses
alone
(Baron
and
Shane
2007,
Nagel
2013).
Even
as
employees,
it
is
estimated
that
over
30%
of
employees
have
tried
to
tap
into
Australia’s
$51
billion
freelancing
economy,
without
being
aware
of
the
potential
health
risks
(Chung
2014).
Solo
entrepreneurs
and
micro-‐businesses
make
a
significant
contribution
to
the
economy,
and
are
seven
times
affected
more
by
mental
health
issues,
stress
and
burnout
than
traditional
employees
(Carson
2015).
Leiter
et
al.
(2014)
define
the
psychological
concept
of
burnout
as
long-‐term
exhaustion
and
diminished
interest
in
work.
Employee
burnout,
referred
to
as
job
burnout
or
compassion
fatigue,
was
first
identified
in
the
1970s
and
since
then
has
been
studied
extensively
(ibid.).
Job
burnout
has
been
persistent
over
time,
and
has
been
found
to
be
a
widespread
phenomenon
around
the
world
(ibid.).
The
literature
has
defined
three
typical
elements
to
employee
burnout:
emotional
exhaustion,
depersonalisation
or
cynicism,
and
a
diminished
sense
of
personal
efficacy
and
accomplishment
(Cordes
and
Dougherty
1993;
Maslach
1981;
Maslach
1982).
Initial
burnout
research
focused
on
proving
that
the
phenomenon
exists,
and
standardising
its
measurement
in
an
occupational
context
(Maslach
1982).
The
social
context
of
job
burnout
focused
on
the
emotional
exhaustion
experienced
by
those
in
occupations
that
involved
both
frequent
and
intense
social
interactions,
such
as
nurses,
medical
students,
teachers
and
psychotherapists
(Maslach
1982;
Maslach
and
Leiter
2010;
Whitebird
et
al.
2013;
Montgomery
2014).
Also,
the
level
of
meaningfulness,
uncertainty
and
role
ambiguity
surrounding
one’s
work
has
been
found
to
also
be
contributing
factors
to
burnout
(ibid.).
Later
literature
focused
on
the
degree
to
which
organisations
are
responsible
for
the
health
and
risk
of
burnout
to
their
staff
(Montgomery
2014;
Whitebird
et
al.
2013;
Calnan
et
al.
2001;
Maslack
and
Goldberg
1998;
Maslach
and
Leiter
2010).
Frequency
of
Social
Interactions
Low
High
FREQUENT
FREQUENT
(NOT
INTENSE)
&
INTENSE
Moderate
burnout
risk
High
burnout
risk
(NOT
FREQUENT)
INTENSE
(NOT
INTENSE)
(NOT
FREQUENT)
Low
burnout
risk
Moderate
burnout
risk
Low
High
Intensity
of
Social
Interactions
Source:
Created
for
this
research
Burnout,
among
stress
and
other
mental
challenges
that
face
entrepreneurs,
has
been
discussed
more
and
more
frequently
in
mainstream
media
in
recent
years
(Carson
2015;
Ellsberg
2014;
Hoehn
2014;
Hughes
2011;
Ferriss
2008).
When
a
psychological
topic
becomes
popular
in
entrepreneurial
publications
in
mainstream
media,
usually
a
new
piece
of
academic
research
or
a
new
book
on
the
subject
is
cited
in
one
or
more
of
the
popular
articles,
as
was
the
case
with
the
growing
interest
in
neuroplasticity
since
2009
(Doidge
2009;
Doidge
2015).
However,
the
entrepreneurial
burnout
phenomenon,
while
frequently
discussed,
cannot
be
traced
back
to
a
new
book
or
academic
research
to
spark
its
recent
popularity.
The
topic
seems
to
have
become
popular
because
authors
and
entrepreneurs
have
been
writing
about
personal
experiences
rather
research.
The
little
academic
research
found
that
specifically
addresses
burnout
in
entrepreneurs
shows
that
the
measures
used
for
employees
are
inadequate
when
applied
to
entrepreneurs
(Shepherd
et
al.
2010;
Grant
and
Ferris
2009).
The
most
common
instrument
used
to
assess
burnout
is
the
Maslach
Burnout
Inventory
and
its
variants
(Maslach
and
Jackson
1981;
Schaufeli
et
al.
1996).
These
instruments
have
been
used
in
academic
research
primarily
with
employee
populations.
While
these
instruments
have
been
adapted
for
various
occupational
groups
and
students,
no
instruments
have
been
found
that
are
specifically
designed
for
use
with
entrepreneur
populations.
Of
six
general
areas
evaluated
in
the
most
common
employee
burnout
assessment,
only
one
directly
applies
to
the
solo
entrepreneur.
The
first
area,
Workload
(See
Figure
2
below),
is
the
only
area
that
is
directly
applicable
to
the
solo
entrepreneur’s
experience.
The
other
five
areas
are
not
relevant
because
the
entrepreneur
has
control
over
their
own
work
environment
and
working
conditions.
Issues
such
as
role
ambiguity,
role
conflict,
role
overload,
communicating
vision,
delegation,
maintaining
drive
and
reputation,
unforeseen
risks,
fear
of
failure,
and
other
entrepreneur-‐specific
antecedents
of
stress
and
burnout
are
not
accounted
for
in
employee
burnout
assessments
(Maslach
and
Jackson
1981;
Shepherd
et
al.
2010;
Grant
and
Ferris
2009).
Figure
2:
Quick
Burnout
Assessment
Source:
Maslach
and
Leiter
2010,
p.48
This
research
investigates
entrepreneurs
in
general,
and
solo
entrepreneurs
in
particular,
exploring
aspects
of
the
experience
of
burnout.
This
approach
provides
new
insights
for
three
important
reasons.
Firstly,
burnout
research
has
traditionally
focused
on
employees,
not
entrepreneurs.
Solo
entrepreneurs
are
uniquely
positioned
to
describe
the
similarities
and
differences
between
being
an
employee
and
being
an
entrepreneur
because
most
have
held
both
roles
in
quick
succession.
Secondly,
burnout
research
has
traditionally
focused
on
people
who
work
closely
with
people,
not
people
who
work
primarily
alone.
Solo
entrepreneurs
may
hire
contractors
and
engage
with
clients,
but
they
generally
work
alone
in
their
business,
control
their
own
schedule,
and
shoulder
the
full
risk
and
responsibility
for
every
decision
in
their
venture
without
partners
or
colleagues.
This
is
a
very
different
experience
of
work
and
may
lead
to
a
very
different
experience
of
burnout.
Finally,
even
within
the
context
of
social
psychology,
typical
burnout
research
has
been
quantitative,
investigating
prevalence
statistics
and
proving
pre-‐existing
hypotheses,
whereas
this
research
is
qualitative,
taking
a
phenomenological
approach
to
explore
the
lived
experience
of
burnout
and
any
common
themes
that
may
organically
emerge.
2.4. Research
questions
The
purpose
of
this
project
is
to
explore
the
phenomenological
experience
and
coping
strategies
of
solo
entrepreneurs
related
to
stress,
fatigue
and
burnout,
and
make
recommendations
for
practice.
The
following
questions
will
be
addressed:
• How
do
solo
entrepreneurs
experience
stress,
fatigue
and
burnout?
• What
are
the
most
stressful
pressures
for
solo
entrepreneurs?
• How
do
solo
entrepreneurs
cope
with
stress,
fatigue,
burnout
and
isolation?
• What
are
the
similarities
and
differences
in
stress,
burnout
and
fatigue
levels
compared
with
previous
work
experience
(before
becoming
a
solo
entrepreneur)?
• What
strategies
do
solo
entrepreneurs
utilise
to
prevent
or
reverse
elevated
stress
and
burnout?
• What,
if
any,
systemic
themes
are
present
in
the
profiles
of
solo
entrepreneurs?
This
research
aims
to
contribute
to
a
significant
issue
that
affects
many
entrepreneurs
by
opening
the
door
for
further
academic
research
for
burnout
and
mental
health
for
this
largely
understudied
population.
Benefits
to
solo
entrepreneurs
include
providing
recommendations
for
burnout
prevention
and
reversal
in
daily
practice.
Initial
research
was
conducted
with
secondary
data,
exploring
burnout
in
academic
literature
and
mainstream
publications.
These
findings
are
shared
in
section
2
above.
Burnout
research
has
primarily
been
conducted
on
employee
populations,
with
no
mention
of
entrepreneurs.
Additionally,
the
majority
of
the
burnout
research
concentrated
on
nursing,
medical,
teaching,
and
psychotherapy
staff
(Maslach
1982;
Montgomery
2014).
The
entrepreneurial
experience
was
not
discussed
in
any
of
the
literature
that
was
reviewed.
Common
assessment
instruments
used
in
research
into
burnout
and
fatigue
were
reviewed.
Primary
data
was
collected
via
online
surveys.
24
respondents
completed
a
short
online
survey
(see
Appendix
2).
The
researcher
assumed
respondents
could
be
busy
and
have
short
attention
spans.
To
ensure
the
most
completed
responses,
this
survey
was
designed
to
be
simple,
quick
and
enjoyable
to
complete
online
(Typeform.com
2015).
The
questions
were
designed
to
apply
specifically
to
solo
entrepreneurs
while
also
incorporating
elements
from
commonly
used
fatigue
and
burnout
instruments,
including
the
Maslach
Burnout
Inventory
(Maslach
and
Jackson
1981)
and
the
Fatigue
Severity
Scale
(Krupp
1989;
Neuberger
2003).
Respondents
worked
in
various
industries,
including
technology,
coaching,
healing,
sales,
finance,
and
translation
services.
Despite
vastly
different
industries
and
work
activities,
the
described
experience
of
entrepreneurship
and
burnout
was
remarkably
similar.
The
number
of
years
working
as
a
solo
entrepreneur
varied
from
a
few
months
to
over
30
years,
with
an
average
of
9.3
years.
Only
one
of
24
respondents
reported
feeling
no
sense
of
meaning
or
contribution
in
his
or
her
work.
There
were
slightly
more
female
(54.1%)
than
males
(45.9%)
respondents.
Despite
100%
stating
that
they
were
good
at
their
work,
over
half
the
respondents
(54.1%)
stated
that
they
missed
deadlines
a
few
times
per
month
or
more,
and
most
(87.5%)
found
that
stress
and
fatigue
stopped
them
from
thinking
clearly
or
completing
work
as
quickly
as
they
would
like.
Most
of
respondents
(62.5%)
reported
that
stress
and
fatigue
prevented
them
from
starting
as
many
projects
as
they
would
like.
Every
respondent
bar
one
(95.8%)
stated
that
stress
and
fatigue:
• impaired
thinking
speed;
or
• reduced
capacity
to
take
on
new
projects;
• or
both.
As
a
solo
entrepreneur
is
only
as
productive
as
his
or
her
ability
to
start
new
projects,
think
clearly,
and
complete
projects
quickly,
this
finding
may
have
far-‐reaching
performance
implications.
All
interviews
were
conducted
via
phone
or
Skype.
Each
interview
was
between
60-‐75
minutes
in
duration.
24
completed
the
online
survey,
but
only
21
completed
interviews.
One
respondent
was
hospitalised,
and
two
mixed
up
the
times
and
did
not
reschedule.
Each
respondent
was
briefed
about
confidentiality
and
privacy,
and
permission
was
sought
to
record
the
audio
of
the
interview.
One
respondent
refused
permission
to
record
and
requested
only
hand
written
notes
be
taken.
To
minimise
researcher
bias,
while
maintaining
an
unstructured
and
in-‐depth
approach,
leading
questions
were
avoided
(Yin
2013).
The
initial
question
for
each
interview
was
“Tell
me
your
story
of
becoming
a
solo
entrepreneur,
and
your
story
of
burnout
or
fatigue,
if
you
have
one.”
From
there,
if
any
pertinent
themes
were
mentioned,
following
questions
took
the
form
of
“I’m
curious,
you
mentioned
{theme}.
Would
you
tell
me
more
about
that?”
Interviews
revealed
three
different
types
of
burnout
symptoms,
each
of
which
is
different
from
the
typical
employee
burnout
dimensions.
The
most
common
and
significant
themes
that
emerged
during
the
interviews
include:
• Three
types
of
burnout
• Sleep
and
being
“always
on”
• Time
and
control
• Stress
and
pressure
• Support
and
isolation
• Introverts
and
extraverts
Respondents
described
three
distinct
types
of
burnout:
(i)
the
body
just
broke
down,
with
physical
symptoms,
often
affecting
the
immune
and
digestive
systems;
(ii)
mental
fatigue,
with
fuzzy
thinking,
exhaustion,
forgetfulness
and
poor
concentration;
and
(iii)
lack
of
challenge,
with
disinterest
in
the
business
once
it
was
financially
stable.
Some
respondents
reported
having
one
major
burnout
experience,
while
many
had
one
initial
burnout
experience
and
many
subsequent
mini-‐crashes.
For
many,
despite
serious
improvements
they
have
not
ever
felt
as
strong
or
had
the
same
level
of
energy
since
that
first
crash.
For
many
with
physical
symptoms,
there
was
also
a
relational
issue
or
relational
trauma
also
described.
“I
tried
to
work
and
I
could
only
last
an
hour.
I
couldn’t
even
sit
at
a
desk.”
“My
brain
was
fuzzy
and
I
couldn’t
produce.
I
couldn’t
eat,
couldn’t
sleep,
couldn’t
concentrate.”
“It
was
really
disheartening.
And
scary.
I’m
used
to
being
capable
and
competent,
and
all
of
a
sudden
I
wasn’t.”
sleep,
even
though
they
were
regularly
experiencing
it.
Sleep
historians
have
found
that
“first
sleep,
second
sleep”
was
common
knowledge
in
the
times
before
the
invention
of
the
electric
light
bulb
(Ekirch
2005).
Researchers
claim
that
this
broken
sleep
is
a
golden
time
for
creativity
(Emslie
2014)
and
that
the
prolactin
boost
provides
by
this
benevolent
insomnia
may
reduce
inflammation
and
improve
memory
(Gamble
2014).
Entrepreneurs
could
stop
worrying
unnecessarily
about
their
sleep
patterns
if
they
understood
this
common
phenomenon.
“I
was
really
sick.
My
immune
system
wasn’t
working
very
well.
And
I
had
a
lot
of
trouble
with
my
sleep.”
“I
need
my
rest.
Exercise,
good
food,
everything
else
I
can
do
without.
But
if
I
don’t
get
enough
rest,
nothing
works.”
“My
mind
is
always
on.
I
didn’t
have
that
until
I
worked
for
myself.”
“I’m
always
having
ideas
about
the
business.
They’re
just
racing
all
over
the
place.
I
need
to
do
something
physical
to
flush
my
brain
or
it
just
gets
too
exhausting.”
“I
wake
up
from
about
1-‐3am.
Sometimes
2-‐4am.
I
might
have
a
cuppa
tea,
write
out
some
ideas.
Then
I
go
back
to
sleep
and
wake
up
refreshed
at
6.”
“If
I
don’t
get
enough
rest
I
can’t
think
straight
or
do
anything
for
the
next
few
days.
It’s
really
important.”
respondents
described
a
desire
to
have
flexibility
overwhen
they
worked,
especially
to
spend
more
time
with
children,
less
time
commuting,
and
to
be
able
to
work
around
family
commitments
and
health
needs.
The
majority
of
respondents
(62.5%)
shared
that
unreasonable
and
inflexible
work
hours
in
a
previous
role
had
led
to
their
initial
experience
of
burnout,
and
that
having
time
to
rest
and
take
breaks
when
needed
enabled
them
to
not
experience
such
severe
burnout
symptoms
in
the
future.
They
also
described
a
sense
of
meaning
and
agency
that
comes
with
having
control
over
one’s
own
schedule.
“In
corporate,
I
copped
a
lot
of
flack
for
taking
time
off
and
I
got
really
sick.
Now
that
I
plan
my
breaks
in
advance,
I’ve
never
had
the
same
symptoms
since.”
“I
can
create
my
own
schedule,
and
take
big
chunks
of
time
away.
There
are
very
few
limitations
that
are
externally
generated.”
“I
turn
my
phone
to
airplane
mode
for
an
hour
every
day
and
get
down
to
the
beach.”
“On
my
days
off
I
do
something
really
restorative,
like
hiking.”
“Being
a
fulltime
mum
is
my
first
priority.
If
I
need
to,
I
want
to
be
able
to
drop
everything
to
be
there
for
my
kids
without
employees
or
investors
breathing
down
my
neck.”
While
every
respondent
mentioned
having
control
and
flexibility
over
their
schedule
was
a
dominant
reason
for
choosing
to
be
a
solo
entrepreneur,
only
one-‐third
of
the
respondents
actually
turned
up
on
time
for
their
scheduled
interview,
even
when
a
reminder
SMS
was
sent
to
their
phone
(for
50%
of
the
interviewees).
The
interviewees
scheduled
their
own
appointments
via
an
online
scheduler,
and
chose
their
own
date
and
time
for
the
interview.
However,
many
did
not
note
the
appointment
in
their
calendar,
or
thought
it
was
on
a
different
day
or
at
a
different
time
than
was
scheduled.
On
average,
the
researcher
spent
the
first
8-‐12
minutes
of
the
scheduled
interview
time
tracking
down
each
respondent
via
phone,
email
and
social
media.
“The
thing
that
gives,
where
my
stress
comes
out,
is
in
my
relationship
with
my
husband.
Whenever
I
am
tired
I
take
it
out
on
him.”
“I’m
still
stressed,
but
it’s
a
different
stress
now.”
“I
was
in
high
pressure
work,
with
high
expectations
on
performance
and
results.
That’s
when
I
got
burnt
out.”
“It
comes
down
to
the
basics.
If
I
don’t
get
enough
sleep
or
basic
nutrition
or
hydration,
I
just
can’t
handle
much
at
all
and
everything
feels
more
stressful.”
common
experience
of
isolation
did
not
occur
as
a
solo
entrepreneur,
but
when
respondents
were
in
traditional
employment.
Many
described
feeling
very
isolated
when
surrounded
by
lots
of
people
in
the
workplace.
The
worst
–
and
most
common
–
experience
of
organisational
culture,
when
a
person
or
team
in
the
role
of
providing
support
was
not
actually
supportive,
and
had
to
be
avoided
in
times
of
stress
rather
leaned
on.
“They
didn’t
believe
me
at
first.
It
took
my
supervisor
a
few
weeks
to
see
how
serious
it
was.”
“I
thought
they
were
there
for
me,
but
suddenly
I
found
myself
out
in
the
cold.”
“Having
‘named’
support
that’s
not
actually
supportive.
Like
when
everyone
knows
that
whoever
goes
and
talks
to
the
HR
department
about
their
troubles
is
getting
fired.”
“When
you
have
to
walk
on
eggshells
around
and
cover
your
*ss
in
front
of
them…
It
just
grinds
down
the
spirit.”
solo
as
a
conscious
decision
that
inoculated
them
from
the
burnout
factors
they
had
experienced
in
previous
workplaces.
4. Key Findings
Almost
all
respondents
interviewed
had
experienced
burnout
working
long
hours
in
high-‐pressure
corporate
or
consulting
careers
before
they
decided
to
work
for
themselves.
In
the
majority
of
cases,
becoming
a
solo
entrepreneur
was
the
cure
to
their
burnout,
rather
than
its
cause.
Also,
in
54.2%
of
respondents,
the
decision
to
go
solo
was
to
have
greater
flexibility
and
control
over
the
work
schedule,
with
69.2%
of
those
cases
wanting
more
time
to
be
flexible
around
time
with
children
and
family.
Often
the
area
in
which
the
respondent
felt
a
lack
of
control
in
the
workplace
and
served
as
a
catalyst
to
“inspire”
the
respondent
to
work
for
him-‐
or
herself
in
order
to
gain
more
control
over
that
particular
aspect
of
their
daily
work
experience:
schedule,
breaks,
support,
clientele,
food,
or
decision
making.
How
solo
entrepreneurs
prevent
and
cope
with
burnout,
stress
and
fatigue
Solo
entrepreneurs
reported
preventing
using
burnout
by
planning
work
breaks
or
vacations
in
advance,
balancing
their
workload,
and
utilising
social
and
professional
support
networks.
Despite
working
alone
now,
most
respondents
cited
that
they
felt
most
isolated
while
surrounded
by
people
in
a
previous
work
environment.
Many
described
having
support
systems
in
place
that
paid
lip
service
to
supporting
employees,
but
that
could
not
be
relied
upon
for
actual
support.
Many
reported
maintaining
a
brave
face
in
order
to
keep
one’s
job,
rather
than
being
able
to
use
support
systems
to
ease
the
work-‐related
burdens.
This
kind
of
pseudo-‐support
seemed
to
increase
stress
and
pressure
in
each
respondent
that
shared
such
an
experience,
and
became
a
key
reason
in
the
decision
to
go
solo.
The
majority
of
respondents
described
having
very
strong
personal
and
professional
support
networks
in
their
lives
that
they
accessed
regularly
as
a
solo
entrepreneur.
Self-‐identified
introverts
and
extraverts
expressed
very
different
experiences
of
solo
entrepreneurship.
Solo
entrepreneurs
who
described
themselves
as
“a
lone
wolf”
or
“a
solitary
person”
enjoy
the
experience
of
working
alone,
making
their
own
decisions,
having
no
one
to
answer
to,
and
having
contact
primarily
with
clients
and
close
friends
and
family
rather
than
colleagues.
Introverts
had
reliable
support
networks,
but
were
solitary
in
their
business
activities
and
business
decisions.
Extraverts,
however,
felt
they
did
their
best
work
in
partnerships,
had
often
worked
in
partnerships
in
the
past,
and
tended
to
only
work
solo
while
between
partnerships.
Every
respondent
was
aware
of
their
personal
early
warning
signals
and
coping
strategies
they
used
when
getting
close
to
burnout.
Most
spontaneously
said
that
they
would
like
to
be
more
proactive
and
preventative
about
“doing
what
works”
rather
than
waiting
until
they
hit
the
wall.
Common
coping
strategies
include
being
in
nature,
meditating,
showers,
yoga,
taking
a
walk.
Two
very
common
coping
strategies
were
making
lists
and
being
in
or
on
the
water
(swimming,
kayaking,
surfing,
walking
near
the
lake,
taking
a
bath).
Water
seems
to
have
soothing
effect
and
clears
the
mind,
which
is
a
common
need
among
all
the
respondents.
5. Key
Implications
Typical
measures
of
occupational
stress
and
job
burnout
do
not
fully
apply
to
entrepreneurial
stress
and
burnout
(Shepherd
et
al.
2010;
Grant
and
Ferris
2009).
This
research
contributes
in
part
to
start
shedding
some
light
on
the
issue
of
burnout
in
this
important
but
largely
understudied
population.
Employees
and
solo
entrepreneurs
do
not
experience
work
the
same
way,
and
they
do
not
experience
burnout
the
same
way.
Differences
in
control
of
schedule,
isolation,
and
downtime
results
in
burnout
manifesting
differently
in
solo
entrepreneurs
than
in
employees.
Employees
experience
burnout
as
a
combination
of
exhaustion,
cynicism,
and
professional
efficacy
(Maslach
1982;
Langballe
et
al.
2006),
whereas
solo
entrepreneurs
experience
three
very
different
versions
of
burnout:
physical
body
breakdown,
mental
exhaustion,
and
lack
of
challenge.
Respondents
consistently
reported
having
greater
control
over
their
schedule
as
solo
entrepreneurs,
but
also
having
the
experience
of
“always
being
on”
The
experience
of
“the
mind
always
racing
with
ideas,”
“there’s
always
another
decision
to
make,”
and
not
being
able
to
“leave
work
at
the
office
at
5pm
like
normal
people”
was
described
over
and
over
in
the
interviews.
Burnout
symptoms
were
experienced
in
the
past,
but
recurred
from
time
to
time
for
many
respondents.
Despite
the
mental
health
risks,
entrepreneurs
have
been
known
to
regard
working
around
the
clock
or
never
sleeping
as
a
status
symbol
(Carson
2015;
Hoehn
2014;
Gamble
2011;
Ferriss
2008).
However,
with
insufficient
sleep,
solo
entrepreneurs
experienced
more
stress
and
pressure,
which
most
commonly
showed
up
in
their
personal
relationships,
decision-‐making
ability,
and
time
management.
The
most
effective
coping
strategies
involved
getting
out
of
one’s
thoughts
completely
with
a
physical
or
social
activity,
or
spending
time
in
nature,
in
a
way
that
enabled
the
respondent
to
“switch
off”
and
“flush
the
brain.”
For
respondents
who
described
burnout
as
a
less
recent
event,
or
those
who
had
had
chronic
burnout
symptoms
for
two
or
more
years,
common
themes
emerged
about
time
management
methods
that
worked
around
fluctuating
mental
and
physical
energy
levels.
Counter-‐intuitively,
isolation
was
experienced
more
when
working
a
job
(surrounded
by
colleagues)
than
when
working
alone.
Solo
entrepreneurs
often
design,
access,
and
adjust
aspects
of
time
management
and
social
support
that
are
most
helpful
for
them
personally.
The
top
five
recommendations
for
solo
entrepreneurs
are:
(1)
Know
your
personal
early
warning
signs:
brain,
body
or
boredom;
(2)
Learn
to
clear
your
mind
and
step
away
from
your
work
daily
and
weekly;
(3)
Balance
your
work
to
allow
both
time
alone
and
social
contact;
and
(4)
Time-‐box
tasks
based
on
energy
levels
and
mental
capacity,
not
by
urgency;
(5)
Embrace
natural
sleep
cycles,
including
segmented
sleep,
but
don’t
force
it.
Solo
entrepreneurship
enables
higher
levels
of
autonomy,
agency
and
purpose,
but
can
increase
uncertainty,
stress
and
role
ambiguity,
while
reducing
sleep
and
the
ability
to
shut
off
and
clear
the
mind.
Most
solo
entrepreneurs
report
having
some
rejuvenating
and
restorative
practices,
but
don’t
use
them
as
often
or
as
regularly
as
they
would
like.
Best
practice
coping
and
prevention
strategies
include
by
aligning
work,
sleep
and
restoration
patterns
with
natural
cycles.
Recommendations
are
provided
in
more
detail
in
the
Entrepreneur
Burnout
Profile
(Appendix
4).
6. Conclusion
The
greatest
challenge
during
this
research
project
was
the
consistent
tardiness
and
forgetfulness
of
the
respondents
in
regard
to
the
interview
schedule,
but
this
became
valuable
data.
A
debt
of
gratitude
is
owed
to
each
of
the
solo
entrepreneurs
who
shared
their
time
and
their
stories
by
being
part
of
this
research.
Their
contribution
has
helped
to
reveal
unique
insights
that
may
help
other
solo
entrepreneurs.
Future
research
could
expand
on
these
findings
and
attempt
to
establish
more
detailed
prevalence
data.
Similar
research
could
be
conducted
with
other
sub-‐groups
within
the
entrepreneur
population.
Action
research
or
longitudinal
studies
could
be
conducted
to
evaluate
the
efficacy
of
burnout
prevention
or
reversal
strategies
in
entrepreneurs.
Many
references
were
made
to
adverse
childhood
experiences
and
relational
trauma
in
the
interviews,
and
more
frequent
references
are
made
to
mental
health
and
entrepreneurship
in
mainstream
media.
It
may
be
fruitful
to
conduct
linguistic
or
psychological
research
to
explore
links
between
adverse
childhood
experiences,
types
of
burnout,
and
entrepreneurship
as
a
career
path.
This
research
revealed
some
thought-‐provoking
insights
into
the
experience
and
prevention
of
burnout,
stress
and
fatigue
in
solo
entrepreneurs,
and
made
recommendations
of
practical
measures
for
the
prevention
and
reversal
of
burnout.
7. References
Arum,
R.
and
Müller,
W.
2004.
The
reemergence
of
self-‐employment.
Princeton,
N.J.:
Princeton
University
Press.
Ashkar,
K.,
Romani,
M.,
Musharrafieh,
U.
and
Chaaya,
M.
2010.
Prevalence
of
burnout
syndrome
among
medical
residents:
experience
of
a
developing
country.
Postgraduate
Medical
Journal86(1015),
pp.
266-‐271.
Baron,
R.
and
Shane,
S.
2007.
Entrepreneurship:
A
process
perspective.
2nd
ed.
Mason,
Ohio:
Thomson/South-‐Western.
Bruder,
J.
2012.
The
Psychological
Price
of
Entrepreneurship
[Online].
Available
at:
http://www.inc.com/magazine/201309/jessica-‐bruder/psychological-‐price-‐of-‐
entrepreneurship.html
[Accessed:
19
February
2015].
Calnan,
M.,
Wainwright,
D.,
Forsythe,
M.,
Wall,
B.
and
Almond,
S.
2001.
Mental
health
and
stress
in
the
workplace:
the
case
of
general
practice
in
the
UK.
Social
Science
&
Medicine
52(4),
pp.
499-‐507.
Carson,
B.
2015.
There's
a
dark
side
to
startups,
and
it
haunts
30%
of
the
world's
most
brilliant
people
[Online].
Available
at:
http://www.businessinsider.com.au/austen-‐
heinzs-‐suicide-‐and-‐depression-‐in-‐startups-‐2015-‐7
[Accessed:
3
July
2015].
Chung,
F.
2014.
How
to
get
in
on
the
hidden
$51
billion
economy
[Online].
Available
at:
http://www.news.com.au/finance/work/nearly-‐one-‐third-‐of-‐australians-‐taking-‐
part-‐in-‐51-‐billion-‐a-‐year-‐freelance-‐economy/story-‐fnkgbb3b-‐1227102048859
[Accessed:
3
May
2015].
Cordes,
C.
and
Dougherty,
T.
1993.
A
review
and
an
integration
of
research
on
job
burnout.
The
Academy
of
Management
Review
18(4),
pp.
621-‐656.
Doidge,
N.
2007.
The
brain
that
changes
itself.
New
York:
Viking.
Doidge,
N.
2015.
The
brain's
way
of
healing.
New
York:
Viking.
Ekirch,
A.
2005.
At
day's
close.
New
York:
Norton.
Ellsberg,
M.
2014.
How
I
overcame
Bipolar
II
(and
saved
my
own
life).
Forbes,
pp.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelellsberg/2011/07/18/how-‐i-‐overcame-‐
bipolar-‐ii/.
Emslie,
K.
2014.
Why
broken
sleep
is
a
golden
time
for
creativity
[Online].
Available
at:
http://aeon.co/magazine/psychology/why-‐broken-‐sleep-‐is-‐a-‐golden-‐time-‐for-‐
creativity/
[Accessed:
3
May
2015].
Ferriss,
T.
2008.
Harnessing
entrepreneurial
manic-‐depression:
Making
the
roller
coaster
work
for
you.Four
Hour
blog.
Available
at:
http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/2008/10/03/harnessing-‐
entrepreneurial-‐manic-‐depression-‐making-‐the-‐rollercoaster-‐work-‐for-‐you/
[Accessed:
21
January
2014].
Gamble,
J.
2011.
The
siesta
and
the
midnight
sun.
Toronto:
Viking
Canada.
Grant,
S.
and
Ferris,
K.
2009.
Measuring
stress
in
entrepreneurs:
are
existing
occupational
stress
scales
relevant?.
In:
AGSE
International
Entrepreneurship
Research
Exchange.
Adelaide:
Australian
Graduate
School
of
Entrepreneurship,
Swinburne
University
of
Technology.
Gray,
J.
2015.
Isolation:
Often
the
Entrepreneur's
Greatest,
but
Least
Anticipated
Challenge
[Online].
Available
at:
http://ny.americanentrepreneurship.com/entrepreneurship/isolation-‐often-‐the-‐
entrepreneur-‐s-‐greatest-‐but-‐least-‐anticipated-‐challenge.html
[Accessed:
12
April
2015].
Hamilton,
R.
2009.
Entrepreneurship
and
Talent
Dynamics.
Hoehn,
C.
2014.
Play
it
away:
A
workaholic's
cure
for
anxiety.
Charlie
Hoehn.
Hughes,
N.
2011.
The
Numerous
Mental
Disorders
You
Probably
Have
As
A
Founder
[Online].
Available
at:
http://soentrepreneurial.com/2011/12/05/the-‐numerous-‐
mental-‐disorders-‐you-‐probably-‐have-‐as-‐a-‐founder/
[Accessed:
19
February
2015].
Kraft,
C.
2006.
Avoiding
the
solo
trap
of
entrepreneurs.
Career
Planning
and
Adult
Development
Journal
22(2),
p.
78.
Krupp,
L.
1989.
The
Fatigue
Severity
Scale.
Archives
of
Neurology
46(10),
p.
1121.
Kuratko,
D.
2014.
Entrepreneurship:
Theory,
process,
and
practice.
9th
ed.
Mason,
Ohio:
South-‐Western
Cengage
learning.
Langballe,
E.,
Falkum,
E.,
Innstrand,
S.
and
Aasland,
O.
2006.
The
Factorial
Validity
of
the
Maslach
Burnout
Inventory-‐General
Survey
in
Representative
Samples
of
Eight
Different
Occupational
Groups.
Journal
of
Career
Assessment
14(3),
pp.
370-‐384.
Leiter,
M.
and
Maslach,
C.
2005.
Banishing
burnout.
San
Francisco:
Jossey-‐Bass.
Leiter,
M.,
Bakker,
A.
and
Maslach,
C.
2014.
Burnout
at
work:
A
psychological
perspective.
New
York:
Psychology
Press.
Maslach,
C.
and
Goldberg,
J.
1998.
Prevention
of
burnout:
New
perspectives.
Applied
and
Preventive
Psychology
7(1),
pp.
63-‐74.
Maslach,
C.
and
Jackson,
S.
1981.
Maslach
Burnout
Inventory.
Palo
Alto,
CA:
Consulting
Psychologists
Press.
Maslach,
C.
and
Leiter,
M.
2010.
Reversing
burnout:
How
to
rekindle
your
passion
for
your
work.Stanford
Social
Innovation
Review,
pp.
42-‐49.
Maslach,
C.
and
Leiter,
M.
1997.
The
truth
about
burnout.
San
Francisco,
Calif.:
Jossey-‐
Bass.
Maslach,
C.
1982.
Burnout:
The
cost
of
caring.
Englewood
Cliffs,
N.J.:
Prentice-‐Hall.
Maslach,
C.
1981.
Burnout:
A
social
psychological
analysis.
In:
Jones
(Ed.),
J.
ed.
The
burnout
syndrome.
1st
ed.
Park
Ridge,
IL:
London
House
Press,
pp.
30-‐53.
Montgomery,
A.
2014.
The
inevitability
of
physician
burnout:
Implications
for
interventions.
Burnout
Research
1(1),
pp.
50-‐56.
Nagel,
J.
2013.
Solo
entrepreneurs:
Better
and
smarter
but
maybe
not
richer
[Online].
Available
at:
http://connect.forwardmetrics.com/entrepreneurship/solo-‐
entrepreneurs-‐better-‐smarter-‐but-‐maybe-‐not-‐richer.html
[Accessed:
12
June
2015].
Neuberger,
G.
2003.
Measures
of
fatigue:
The
Fatigue
Questionnaire,
Fatigue
Severity
Scale,
Multidimensional
Assessment
of
Fatigue
Scale,
and
Short
Form-‐36
Vitality
(Energy/Fatigue)
Subscale
of
the
Short
Form
Health
Survey.
Arthritis
&
Rheumatism
49(S5),
pp.
S175-‐S183.
Pink,
D.
2009.
Drive.
New
York,
NY:
Riverhead
Books.
Robinson,
J.
2011.
How
to
Avoid
Entrepreneur
Overload
[Online].
Available
at:
http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/219311
[Accessed:
19
February
2015].
Saunders,
M.,
Lewis,
P.
and
Thornhill,
A.
2012.
Research
methods
for
business
students.
6th
ed.
Essex,
England:
Pearson.
Schaufeli,
W.,
Leiter,
M.,
Maslach,
C.
and
Jackson,
S.
1996.
Maslach
Burnout
Inventory-‐
General
Survey
(MBI-‐GS).
Palo
Alto,
CA:
Consulting
Psychologists
Press.
Seegal,
S.
2012.
For
young
entrepreneurs,
the
price
of
a
startup
could
be
your
mental
health
[Online].
Available
at:
http://venturebeat.com/2012/09/25/entrepreneur/
[Accessed:
19
February
2015].
Shane,
S.
2003.
A
general
theory
of
entrepreneurship:
The
individual-‐opportunity
nexus.
Cheltenham,
UK:
Edward
Elgar
Publishing.
Shepherd,
C.,
Marchisio,
G.,
Morrish,
S.,
Deacon,
J.
and
Miles,
M.
2010.
Entrepreneurial
burnout:
exploring
antecedents,
dimensions
and
outcomes.
Journal
of
Research
in
Marketing
and
Entrepreneurship
12(1),
pp.
71-‐79.
Smbceo.com,
2012.
4
Ways
to
Beat
Entrepreneurial
Fatigue
|
SMALL
BUSINESS
CEO
[Online].
Available
at:
http://www.smbceo.com/2011/05/17/entrepreneurial-‐
fatigue/
[Accessed:
19
February
2015].
Spinelli,
S.
and
Adams,
R.
2012.
New
venture
creation:
Entrepreneurship
for
the
21st
century.
9th
ed.
New
York:
McGraw-‐Hill/Irwin.
Switzer,
P.
2007.
Exploding
the
myth
of
SME
failure
rates.
The
Australian.
The
Sydney
Morning
Herald,
2011.
Dealing
with
isolation
as
a
solo
entrepreneur
[Online].
Available
at:
http://www.smh.com.au/it-‐pro/dealing-‐with-‐isolation-‐
20110220-‐1b0pv.html
[Accessed:
19
February
2015].
Typeform.com,
2015.
Available
at:
http://typeform.com
[Accessed:
7
April
2015].
Wasdani,
K.
and
Mathew,
M.
2014.
Potential
for
opportunity
recognition
along
the
stages
of
entrepreneurship.
Journal
of
Global
Entrepreneurship
Research
2(1),
p.
7.
Whitebird,
R.,
Asche,
S.,
Thompson,
G.,
Rossom,
R.
and
Heinrich,
R.
2013.
Stress,
Burnout,
Compassion
Fatigue,
and
Mental
Health
in
Hospice
Workers
in
Minnesota.
Journal
of
Palliative
Medicine
16(12),
pp.
1534-‐1539.
Yin,
R.
2014.
Case
study
research:
Design
and
methods.
5th
ed.
Thousand
Oaks,
Calif.:
Sage
Publications.
8. Appendices
Appendix
1:
Individual
consent
form...........................................................18
Appendix
2:
Online
survey
questions
and
results........................................19
Appendix
3:
Interview
themes.....................................................................25
Appendix
4:
Entrepreneur
Burnout
Profile
(EBP) ........................................27
ENTREPRENEUR vs JOB
Story of going solo Similarities + differences
BURNOUT/FATIGUE
Story of burnout COPING
- Emotional exhaustion
- Depersonalisation
- Personal accomplishment
STRESS SUPPORT
Most stressful pressures Isolation
Biggest complaint
TRAUMA
Siblings and parents FAMILY
Early or tragic deaths
Major loss or separations
Don’t talk about
DESIRES LESSONS