One of our IT Security guys did that. He's now retired, a well deserved retirement, mind you!
He also sometimes left chocolate at desks with locked screens.
1783 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Aug 2018
My wife's boss once told somebody who treated his employees badly that only he had the right to shout at them, after all, he does pay them. Customers are free to shout at him (they pay him), at which point he might rethink doing business with them.
Note that he does not shout (as this is not the correct way to treat people).
Do I read that correctly? Windows-Phone? Those still exist? Or is that the MS apps for 'droid? Those are... well.... quite par for the software quality coming out of Redmond in the last decade or so.
The Windows Phone UI was a pleasure to use, responsive, unobtrusive, quite plain. Unfortunately they had to ruin it.
CS is not Office.
CS is lots of maths. Unless you enjoy that, CS is not for you. CS is not programming.
Programming is something you can teach yourself. Most of us did. It was expected that you can program when you are studying physics (even decades ago). Not everybody needs to know how to program. I can fix older cars, at least some issues, but it's not a necessary skill.
Do we need classes teaching people how to use office? I don't think so. Not a whole year, at least, or a semester, three days should be enough. They are simple enough to use for most things you need in an office job. And I mean both Microsoft and Libre / Free / OpenOffice.
Teaching basic concepts makes sense, but you need some fun exercises, and show how things are connected.
Most scientists and engineers working in roles close to science (like at NASA, ESA, university labs etc.) really enjoy their jobs. I know I did, but the job opportunities are getting more scarce as you move up the ladder in your qulifications and work experience. Many positions are fixed term (one to four years), and then you have to move on. There are tenured positions, but those are basically through a dead man's (or woman's) shoes... You need to be pretty good as a scientist and brilliant in getting research funds (yes, that order) and of course bloody lucky.
I visited Effelsberg when I was young (several decades ago) and was suitably impressed. It is hard to imagine just how big this thing is. Unfortunately my career took a different turn, and I did astrophysics only as electives (and some lectures just as a guest, because back then nobody cared[1]).
[1] There used to be a time when as a student you basically had the right to attend any lecture you wished - there were some constraints when it came to labs, those were off limits, but lectures? Just go, enjoy, learn something new (provided the lecture theatre was big enough and you were not a nuisance. I did a couple of philosophy classes, astrophysics, musical theory, lots of maths and stats without doing exams, just because it was either enjoyable, interesting or neccessary for my theses (and thus interesting and actually fun). I wish I was bloody filthy rich, so I could stop working and study some more, hang out with scientists again...
The companies that do this kind of ... shite ... are thsoe that want to see backs in the office, butts on chairs.
I can read ElReg at work just as well as in the home office. As the BOFH remarked at home there was (in the olden times with a single income family) at least the possibility that those slackers would get trouble from their wife when she finds out they are just slacking off.
On the other hand "thankfully, a snipped of code that redirects users clicking on the 'about us' link to a random porn site looks 'just like the matrix'..." (also BOFH)
"Addressing these biases requires a nuanced approach, considering both the model's characteristics and the context in which it operates," the study suggests. "When classifying or evaluating, we propose you always mask the name and obfuscate the gender to ensure the results are as general and unbiased as possible as well as provide a criteria for how to grade in your system-instruct prompt."
Just don't (expletive deleted) use these (vernacular + slur removed) systems. They are clearly not fit for purpose.
Sheesh.
I need a weekend. Or a holiday. Or maybe a change of career, just sitting atop a mountain[1].
[1] maybe a mountain of skulls of my enemies, i.e. those that are pushing AI (or whatever the current latest fad is at that time), As Cohen the Barbarian remakred you'd need a lot of skulls as they do not pile up all that well. Did I mention I need a weekend soon?
Well... this was not (openly) about "vote republican", bat rather "support this and that thingy", so no need to vote for Trump to be (allegedly) elegible - but of course you never were elegble, and that is the problem.
Still, yes, you get the eejits in charge you voted for, and their cronies who you absolutely knew about, and they will see the country similarly as the governor of Korsika did in the Asterix comic book. They even said so. And still you voted for them. Pity for the rest of the world, but sorry, you do get what you apparently wanted so badly. Just sucks to be poor, coloured, female, have a non-traditional lifestyle (in any way, family, sexuality, personality, or whatever they will target now), work in science (unless you develop big weapons), or are not a billionaire.
Yes, over where I am people vote for eejits as well, though so far we have been spared the worst idiots - until the next election at least.
"Google names top five online scams"
Now... how about those scams promoted by the advertising on youtube that I sometimes report on - which is then answered with "nah, conforms to our guidelines"? How about you clean up your ship? And... what I would actually want to write would get that comment removed by the moderatrix, so I won't write that. But I hope they have a nice friendship day. Both the ones at youtube promoting scams and the scammers.
Somebody has to pay for which costs exactly? As a peer reviewer I work for free....
Yes, there's typesetting and general manuscript wrangling, and I really enjoyed the times when I got some motivated typesetter who did actually catch an inconsistent notation in the maths (vectors should look like this, tensors should be that, use upper case greek for these things... ). We had some disagreement about points, but in the end it was a good process. So there (an open access journal) things went very well. The university did cough up the publication costs, they had a special grant to make things open access. So, yes, there are some costs, and those need to be covered somehow.
Yes, I totally agree - in principle, but those Open Access journals are even more expensive to publish in than Evilsvier journals. Unless you have the grants to actually pay for that on top of the ridicolous publication charges you just don't do it. The science publishing world is completely f'd up: you do your reasearch, some of it on your own time (because, hey, it's interesting, and the 40 hours or so you get paid for are taken up with teaching or faculty stuff, or writing grant proposals, etc.). You write the paper, send it off to a publisher. Then it gets sent to your peers for review (who do that in their own time, for free, see above), and then you pay for it to be published. And then you pay to access your own bloody article you just wrote and paid to get published. It is a f'ing mess, and even ten years ago (when I quit academia) you could easily by a grand for a medium sized paper with a couple of colour pictures (those cost extra, because of... dunno, they say so, used to be that printing colour was expensive, but nowadays this is all "online only") - without it being open access. So... yeah. There's that.
And a software license for a couple grand per year and probably person (and those are "academia rates")? You got to be joking! There's no way small groups in underfunded basic research have that kind of cash.
Where I grew up this would make the local news. Barely. Unless you need to evacuate a bunch of people for a few hours, or removal was especially difficult.
I'm pretty sure it's the same in London, which the Luftwaffe bombed heavily (so glad we don't do that any more, both sides involved).
Close to a major city that was almost completely bombed to the ground. And what was left got torn down to make the city more car friendly in the 50s. We have those basically every other week, about bimonthly it makes the local news, on average. The husband of a friend works for a removal squad back home. Nerves of steel, and hopefully other parts as well, we are all grateful he is not a risk taker,not an adrenaline junkie.
"Minimal interaction with a malicious file by a user such as selecting (single-click), inspecting (right-click), or performing an action other than opening or executing could trigger this vulnerability,"
I cannot select it to delete it without triggering the vulnerability? OK, I use the command line and powershell (and prefer Linux anyway, but at work you got what you get) daily, no problem in principle, but I consider this really bad news. Not the same level as a remote exploit, but still...
And why would that code already be executed when just selecting the file? Just.... Why?
Nah, not here.... paperwork in overpopulated Europe is a nightmare. I have friends in Canada who indeed have a light aircraft on their farm.
About the "land clear", it's that plus 600m above the highest point in 2km radius, but both are unless you are taking off or landing (which you would be in this case). IFR rules are maybe different, not sure what "automated remote operation" falls under. The closest city is almost completely under D, plus C is at 1500ft MSL for the rest (my home inlcuded) due to $(big_international_airport). Some of my friends and club mates are CVFR (and some IFR) certified, and they sometimes do midfield crossings at the above-mentioned airport and buzz the city on slow days, just to do some sightseeing :) (I stick to real flying, i.e. gliders, no FNC (fuel to noise converters) for me... and alas no sightseeing ;) ).
ok, it's 30km. That is not nothing, looking at inner city distances. But it will have to charge its batteries after each and every flight - which is not a problem per se, as not too many people will take those. There are several reasons, price being one. The next is that you need a helipad at start and destination, unless you want to abseil special forces style from the hovering thing - I don't really see them updating all the regulations about where you can land and take off[1]. Then I am also not sure about flight exclusion zones, controlled airspace especially in cities. Oh, and then there's the noise[3]. We have a heli company at the airfield in the next village, and a heli intructor, and those do make quite a racket. Glad they are mostly avoiding our area, but that's mainly because we do live under the CTR of a major airport, and one of the departure routes is pretty close by.
Sometimes we have police choppers or rescue choppers, those are noisy as well... I'm pretty sure those flying robo taxi choppers will come under scrutiny.
But once they figure those things out it is really going to be a success story, and all of us naysayers are going to look quite silly.
Oh, and this whole contraption reminds me of the WTYP episode about the Osprey. One can only hope it works just as well.
[1] exempt are, top of my head list: gliders, those may just land mostly anywhere, they cannot help it, police, search and rescue, army can land their 'copters anywhere and take off anywhere provided they have a reason[2] to do so, everybody else is on a case by case basis
[2] for the army all the reason they need is "we got told to do it"
[3] the noise is not mainly caused by the engine, but rather by their rotating blades
Oooh, yes!
I got bitten by this as well. Somehow my Bitlocker-Password didn't work :D - imagine my amazement when I told it to show me what I typed in...
Now the stupid thing is that the "num lock" is persistent after reboot, which is annoying if you use a full sized keyboard at the office and the laptop without a keyboard on the road / at the dinner table.
Back when regular travelling was neccessary for my job I was really fond of netbook-sized machines. A 14" screen is almost too big for my then usecase. It was always fun to see guys struggle with their ginormous laptops (>14" screens), which were impossible to work on in the cheap seats of an airplane :D
I had a Samsung netbook and later a small 14" Lenovo. The Samsung was perfectly sized, the Lenovo almost too big. Battery life was ok (Samsung >10 hrs! Lenovo only... 8-ish), which is the second constraint I had.
I was also commuting >3hrs / day to one of my jobs, and the netbooks worked very well for that purpose.
Nowadays I care sweet FA, I only travel nationally by train, and my employer springs fro 1st class - ample space for me. And you can order your beer to your seat.
The US have aircraft carriers and F35s (and also some planes that actually do work) - not sure if $(south-east-asian-reviewfarm) has them as well...
What they are going after is US companies that buy reviews for their products. Every little bit helps. No, it won't help us on the other side of the pond.
Using AI, which is know to halluzinate and return wrong answers, is clearly the way to do any kind of research. Much like Wikipedia - several things are pretty good, other things are written by people with no clue or those trying to push their version of the story. And no, you just cannot correct the pages, as the old state will be restored within a short period of time.
Well, it basically shows that unless you have folk to argue with the employer on behalf of a larger group you are... "loved" (using the lookup table created by teh alte Ronald Saveloy the Apologetic, T.Pratchett, Interesting Times). Being represented helps, obviously. This is why we have unions (and quite strong ones in Germany, France and Scandinavia).
I'd take that information in any time zone, provided it is clearly communicated. Preferrably with (UTC +2) or somesuch (this one would be CEST, which is not "Central Eastern Standard Time" if such a thing exists, which is why "common names" should not be used.)
Of couse I would prefer a string like 20241021Z0920, which even TSQL should interprete correctly....