Leslie King

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Leslie King
Image of Leslie King
Mississippi Supreme Court District 1 Position 2
Tenure

2011 - Present

Term ends

2028

Years in position

13

Compensation

Base salary

$173,800

Elections and appointments
Last elected

November 3, 2020

Education

Bachelor's

University of Mississippi, 1970

Law

Texas Southern University, Thurgood Marshall School of Law, 1973

Contact

float:right;
border:1px solid #FFB81F;
background-color: white;
width: 250px;
font-size: .9em;
margin-bottom:0px;

} .infobox p { margin-bottom: 0; } .widget-row { display: inline-block; width: 100%; margin-top: 1px; margin-bottom: 1px; } .widget-row.heading { font-size: 1.2em; } .widget-row.value-only { text-align: center; background-color: grey; color: white; font-weight: bold; } .widget-row.value-only.white { background-color: #f9f9f9; } .widget-row.value-only.black { background-color: #f9f9f9; color: black; } .widget-row.Democratic { background-color: #003388; color: white; font-weight: bold; } .widget-row.Republican { background-color: red; color: white; font-weight: bold; } .widget-row.Independent, .widget-row.Nonpartisan, .widget-row.Constitution { background-color: grey; color: white; font-weight: bold; } .widget-row.Libertarian { background-color: #f9d334; color: black; font-weight: bold; } .widget-row.Green { background-color: green; color: white; font-weight: bold; } .widget-key { width: 43%; display: inline-block; padding-left: 10px; vertical-align: top; font-weight: bold; } .widget-value { width: 57%; float: right; display: inline-block; padding-left: 10px; word-wrap: break-word; } .widget-img { width: 150px; display: block; margin: auto; } .clearfix { clear: both; }

Leslie King is a judge for District 1-Position 2 of the Mississippi Supreme Court. He assumed office in 2011. His current term ends on December 31, 2028.

King ran for re-election for the District 1-Position 2 judge of the Mississippi Supreme Court. He won in the general election on November 3, 2020.

King first became a member of the Mississippi Supreme Court after being appointed by Gov. Haley Barbour (R) in 2011. He was subsequently elected to the court in a nonpartisan election in 2012 and re-elected in 2020. To read more about judicial selection in Mississippi, click here.

In 2020, Ballotpedia published Ballotpedia Courts: State Partisanship, a study examining the partisan affiliation of all state supreme court justices in the country. As part of this study, we assigned each justice a Confidence Score describing our confidence in the degree of partisanship exhibited by the justices' past partisan behavior, before they joined the court.[1] King received a confidence score of Mild Democrat.[2] Click here to read more about this study.

Biography

King received an undergraduate degree from the University of Mississippi in 1970 and a J.D. from Texas Southern University School of Law in 1973.[3][4] He was first appointed to the Mississippi Supreme Court in 2011 and appointed to the Mississippi Court of Appeals in 1994. Prior to his service as a judge, he was a representative in the Mississippi House of Representatives from 1980 to 1994.[3]

Elections

2020

See also: Mississippi Supreme Court elections, 2020

General election

General election for Mississippi Supreme Court District 1 Position 2

Incumbent Leslie King won election in the general election for Mississippi Supreme Court District 1 Position 2 on November 3, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Leslie King
Leslie King (Nonpartisan)
 
100.0
 
334,129

Total votes: 334,129
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

2012

See also: Mississippi judicial elections, 2012

King was elected to his first term after running unopposed on November 6, 2012.[5][6]

Campaign themes

2020

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Leslie King did not complete Ballotpedia's 2020 Candidate Connection survey.

Analysis

Ballotpedia Courts: State Partisanship (2020)

See also: Ballotpedia Courts: State Partisanship and Ballotpedia Courts: Determiners and Dissenters

Last updated: June 15, 2020

In 2020, Ballotpedia published Ballotpedia Courts: State Partisanship, a study examining the partisan affiliation of all state supreme court justices in the country as of June 15, 2020.

The study presented Confidence Scores that represented our confidence in each justice's degree of partisan affiliation. This was not a measure of where a justice fell on an ideological spectrum, but rather a measure of how much confidence we had that a justice was or had been affiliated with a political party. The scores were based on seven factors, including but not limited to party registration.[7]

The five resulting categories of Confidence Scores were:

  • Strong Democrat
  • Mild Democrat
  • Indeterminate[8]
  • Mild Republican
  • Strong Republican

This justice's Confidence Score, as well as the factors contributing to that score, is presented below. The information below was current as of June 2020.

.no-hover { text-decoration: none !important; text-decoration-color: none !important; } #PartisanProfile p span[style] { font-size: 16px !important; font-family: 'Libre Franklin' !important; color: #333 !important; } #PartisanProfile span[style] { font-family: 'Libre Franklin' !important; font-size: 16px !important; white-space: normal !important; font-weight: 400 !important; } .gray_accent{ color: #333333; } .gray_divider{ background-color: #333333; height: 5px; width: 50px; } #PartisanProfile>p{ display: none; } .right_side{ overflow-y: scroll !important; } #left_list { list-style: none !important; margin: 0; } #left_list li { margin-bottom: 10px; } .person_name{ font-size: 30pt !important; padding: 0 !important; margin: 0 !important; line-height: 40px; } .part_profile_text{ font-size: 20pt !important; } #PartisanProfile h5 { font-size: 14pt !important; } #PartisanProfile h6{ font-size: 12pt !important; } #left_list span{ font-size: 12pt; } h4 { padding: 0 !important; } .partisan-prof-state { font-size: 24px !important; font-weight: 300; margin: 0; color: #333; }

a .partisan-prof-state { color: #333 !important; } .easy-black li span[style] { color: #333 !important; font-family: 'Libre Franklin' !important; font-size: 16px !important; } .Strong-Republican { background: #A30000 !important; border: 3px solid #A30000 !important; color: #A30000 !important; } .Mild-Republican { background: #F21414 !important; border: 3px solid #F21414 !important; color: #F21414 !important; } .Indeterminate { background: #777777 !important; border: 3px solid #777777 !important; color: #777777 !important; } .Mild-Democrat { background: #275DFF !important; border: 3px solid #275DFF !important; color: #275DFF !important; } .Strong-Democrat { background: #001A9B !important; border: 3px solid #001A9B !important; color: #001A9B !important; }

Leslie
King

Mississippi

  • Partisan Confidence Score:
    Mild Democrat
  • Judicial Selection Method:
    Elected
  • Key Factors:
    • Held political office as a Democrat
    • Was a registered Democrat before 2020
    • Donated less than $2,000 to Democratic candidates


Partisan Profile

Details:

King was a Democratic member of the Mississippi House of Representatives from 1980-1994. He was a registered Democrat prior to 2020. King donated $200 to Democratic candidates and organizations. He was appointed by Gov. Haley Barbour (R).

Other Scores:

In a 2012 study of campaign contributions, King received a campaign finance score of -0.57, indicating a liberal ideological leaning.


Bonica and Woodruff campaign finance scores (2012)

See also: Bonica and Woodruff campaign finance scores of state supreme court justices, 2012

In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford University attempted to determine the partisan ideology of state supreme court justices. They created a scoring system in which a score above 0 indicated a more conservative-leaning ideology, while scores below 0 were more liberal.

King received a campaign finance score of -0.57, indicating a liberal ideological leaning. This was more liberal than the average score of 0.69 that justices received in Mississippi.

The study was based on data from campaign contributions by the judges themselves, the partisan leaning of those who contributed to the judges' campaigns, or, in the absence of elections, the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study was not a definitive label of a justice, but an academic summary of various relevant factors.[9]

Noteworthy cases

Mississippi Supreme Court rejects state-level Auer deference, ends judicial deference in state (2021)

The Mississippi Supreme Court on June 10, 2021, ruled 8-1 in Mississippi Methodist Hospital and Rehabilitation Center Inc. v. Mississippi Division of Medicaid to end the state practice of deferring to agency interpretations of regulations, a doctrine known as Auer deference at the federal level. The court’s decision, combined with its prior rejection of state-level Chevron deference, effectively banned judicial deference practices in the state, according to an analysis by Pacific Legal Foundation attorney Daniel Ortner.[10]

Justice Leslie King wrote the opinion for the court, noting that the practice of “[d]eferring to agency interpretations of rules and regulations is inconsistent with the standard of review for statutory interpretation, causes confusion, causes inconsistencies in application and within our own caselaw, and violates article 1, section 2, of Mississippi’s Constitution.” The court’s decision institutes a new period of de novo review over agency regulatory interpretations.[11]

The court ended the state-level Chevron deference doctrine, which requires courts to defer to agency interpretations of unclear statutes, in the 2018 case King v. Mississippi Military Department. The justices argued that the practice violated the separation of powers prescribed by the state constitution. The King decision instituted a new standard of de novo review over such agency interpretations, which the court later reaffirmed in a 2020 tax and gambling case. Click here to find out more.

State supreme court judicial selection in Mississippi

See also: Judicial selection in Mississippi

The nine justices on the Mississippi Supreme Court are elected to eight-year terms in nonpartisan elections. All candidates must run in the general election (as Mississippi holds no primary for judicial candidates) and must face re-election if they wish to serve again.[12] For more information about these elections, visit the Mississippi judicial elections page.

Unlike most states, supreme court justices in Mississippi are elected to represent specific districts. The nine justices are divided among three supreme court districts (not to be confused with the 22 divisions of the circuit courts) and are voted into office by the residents of their respective regions.[13] Only the states of Illinois, Kentucky, and Louisiana use a similar system.

Qualifications

To serve on this court, a judge must be:

  • a qualified elector for and from the district in which election is sought;
  • a minimum of 30 years old;
  • a practicing attorney; and
  • a state citizen for at least five years.[12]

Chief justice

The court's chief justice is selected by seniority. He or she serves until retirement when the justice with the next most judicial experience becomes chief.[12]

Vacancies

See also: How vacancies are filled in state supreme courts

If a midterm vacancy occurs on the court, a temporary judge is named by the governor. Appointees serve out the remainder of their predecessor's unexpired term if four or fewer years of the term remain. If there are more than four years remaining, the appointee will run in the next general election, taking place nine months or more after the vacancy occurs. The winner of the election will serve the remainder of the term.[14]

The map below highlights how vacancies are filled in state supreme courts across the country.


See also

Mississippi Judicial Selection More Courts
Seal of Mississippi.png
Judicialselectionlogo.png
BP logo.png
Courts in Mississippi
Mississippi Court of Appeals
Mississippi Supreme Court
Elections: 20242023202220212020201920182017
Gubernatorial appointments
Judicial selection in Mississippi
Federal courts
State courts
Local courts

External links

   .contact_entity {font-size: 1.5em ;margin-top: 0.6em; margin-bottom: 0em;margin-right: 0.5em;}
   .contact_office { margin-top: 0.3em; margin-bottom: 0em;margin-right: 0.5em;}
   .external_links_table { width: auto !important; }
   @media (max-width:600px) {
       .contact_entity {font-size: 1.0em ;margin-top: 0.6em; margin-bottom: 0em; margin-right: 0.5em;}
       .contact_office { font-size: 0.8 em; margin-top: 0.6em; margin-bottom: 0em;margin-right: 0.5em;}  
   }

Footnotes

  1. We calculated confidence scores by collecting several data points such as party registration, donations, and previous political campaigns.
  2. The five possible confidence scores were: Strong Democrat, Mild Democrat, Indeterminate, Mild Republican, and Strong Republican.
  3. 3.0 3.1 State of Mississippi Judiciary, "Associate Justice Leslie D. King," accessed November 3, 2017
  4. State of Mississippi Judiciary, "Press release: Judge King appointed," accessed June 29, 2021
  5. Mississippi Secretary of State, "2012 Candidate Qualifying List," accessed June 29, 2021
  6. Mississippi Secretary of State, "Certified election results," accessed June 29, 2021
  7. The seven factors were party registration, donations made to partisan candidates, donations made to political parties, donations received from political parties or bodies with clear political affiliation, participation in political campaigns, the partisanship of the body responsible for appointing the justice, and state trifecta status when the justice joined the court.
  8. An Indeterminate score indicates that there is either not enough information about the justice’s partisan affiliations or that our research found conflicting partisan affiliations.
  9. Stanford University, "State Supreme Court Ideology and 'New Style' Judicial Campaigns," October 31, 2012
  10. Yale Journal on Regulation, "The End of Deference: An Update from Mississippi, by Daniel Ortner," June 26, 2021
  11. JUSTIA, "Mississippi Methodist Hospital & Rehabilitation Center, Inc. v. Mississippi Division of Medicaid et al.," June 10, 2021
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 National Center for State Courts, "Methods of Judicial Selection," accessed September 7, 2021
  13. State of Mississippi Judiciary, "Supreme Court," accessed September 7, 2021
  14. National Center for State Courts, "Methods of Judicial Selection," accessed September 7, 2021