Jennifer L. Brunner
2021 - Present
2027
4
float:right; border:1px solid #FFB81F; background-color: white; width: 250px; font-size: .9em; margin-bottom:0px;
} .infobox p { margin-bottom: 0; } .widget-row { display: inline-block; width: 100%; margin-top: 1px; margin-bottom: 1px; } .widget-row.heading { font-size: 1.2em; } .widget-row.value-only { text-align: center; background-color: grey; color: white; font-weight: bold; } .widget-row.value-only.white { background-color: #f9f9f9; } .widget-row.value-only.black { background-color: #f9f9f9; color: black; } .widget-row.Democratic { background-color: #003388; color: white; font-weight: bold; } .widget-row.Republican { background-color: red; color: white; font-weight: bold; } .widget-row.Independent, .widget-row.Nonpartisan, .widget-row.Constitution { background-color: grey; color: white; font-weight: bold; } .widget-row.Libertarian { background-color: #f9d334; color: black; font-weight: bold; } .widget-row.Green { background-color: green; color: white; font-weight: bold; } .widget-key { width: 43%; display: inline-block; padding-left: 10px; vertical-align: top; font-weight: bold; } .widget-value { width: 57%; float: right; display: inline-block; padding-left: 10px; word-wrap: break-word; } .widget-img { width: 150px; display: block; margin: auto; } .clearfix { clear: both; }
Jennifer L. Brunner (Democratic Party) is a judge of the Ohio Supreme Court. She assumed office on January 2, 2021. Her current term ends on January 1, 2027.
Brunner (Democratic Party) ran for re-election for Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice. She lost in the general election on November 8, 2022.
Brunner completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2022. Click here to read the survey answers.
To read more about judicial selection in Ohio, click here.
Biography
Jennifer Brunner was born in Springfield, Ohio.[1] Brunner earned a bachelor's degree from Miami University in Ohio in 1978 and a J.D. from Capital University Law School in 1983.[1][2] Her career experience includes working as an attorney in private practice.[2] Brunner has served as a board chairperson with the Legacy Fund of The Columbus Foundation and has been a member of Sisters of the Planet Ambassador for Oxfam America and the Ohio Advisory Committee for U.S. Global Leadership Fund.[1] Brunner was a judge on the Ohio Tenth District Court of Appeals from 2015 to 2021. She was elected to the court on November 4, 2014, to serve out the remainder of Judith French's unexpired term through December 31, 2016.[3] She was elected in 2016 to a full six-year term. She joined the state Supreme Court in 2021 when she defeated Justice Judith French in the 2020 general election.
Elections
2022
See also: Ohio Supreme Court elections, 2022
General election
General election for Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice
Incumbent Sharon L. Kennedy defeated incumbent Jennifer L. Brunner in the general election for Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice on November 8, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ |  | Sharon L. Kennedy (R) | 56.1 | 2,307,415 |
 | Jennifer L. Brunner (D)  | 43.9 | 1,807,133 | |
| Total votes: 4,114,548 | |||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice
Incumbent Jennifer L. Brunner advanced from the Democratic primary for Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice on May 3, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | | Jennifer L. Brunner | 100.0 | 445,711 |
| Total votes: 445,711 | |||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Republican primary election
Republican primary for Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice
Incumbent Sharon L. Kennedy advanced from the Republican primary for Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice on May 3, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | | Sharon L. Kennedy | 100.0 | 814,717 |
| Total votes: 814,717 | |||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Campaign finance
Endorsements
To view Brunner's endorsements in the 2022 election, please click here.
2020
See also: Ohio Supreme Court elections, 2020
General election
General election for Ohio Supreme Court
Jennifer L. Brunner defeated incumbent Judith French in the general election for Ohio Supreme Court on November 3, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | | Jennifer L. Brunner (Nonpartisan) | 55.3 | 2,695,072 |
 | Judith French (Nonpartisan) | 44.7 | 2,174,820 | |
| Total votes: 4,869,892 | |||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for Ohio Supreme Court
Jennifer L. Brunner advanced from the Democratic primary for Ohio Supreme Court on April 28, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | | Jennifer L. Brunner | 100.0 | 675,231 |
| Total votes: 675,231 | |||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Republican primary election
Republican primary for Ohio Supreme Court
Incumbent Judith French advanced from the Republican primary for Ohio Supreme Court on April 28, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | | Judith French | 100.0 | 618,739 |
| Total votes: 618,739 | |||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Campaign finance
2016
- Main article: Ohio judicial elections, 2016
Brunner filed to run for the Ohio Tenth District Court of Appeals. No candidate filed to run against her.[4]
Election results
November 8 general election
| Ohio Tenth District Court of Appeals, Brunner's Seat, 2016 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
| Democratic |  Jennifer L. Brunner Incumbent (unopposed) |
100.00% | 340,698 | |
| Total Votes (100% reporting) | 340,698 | |||
| Source: Ohio Secretary of State Official Results | ||||
March 15 primary election
| Ohio Tenth District Court of Appeals, Judge Brunner's Seat Democratic Primary, 2016 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
| Democratic | Jennifer L. Brunner Incumbent (unopposed) |
100.00% | 108,298 | |
| Total Votes | 108,298 | |||
| Source: Ohio Secretary of State Official Results | ||||
2014
- See also: Ohio judicial elections, 2014
Brunner ran for election to the 10th District Court of Appeals.
She defeated Amy O'Grady in the general election on November 4, 2014, receiving 53.1 percent of the vote.[3]
Campaign themes
2022
Video for Ballotpedia
| Video submitted to Ballotpedia Released October 4, 2022 |
Ballotpedia survey responses
See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection
Jennifer L. Brunner completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2022. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Brunner's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.
| Collapse all
I’m running for Chief Justice of the Ohio Supreme Court because justice matters for every Ohioan. Steady and principled leadership of the state’s highest court is essential to helping Ohioans realize justice in their everyday lives. Ohio is a very diverse state with deep rural roots, storied urban communities and countless small and middle sized towns and cities. I take seriously my responsibility as one of seven people elected to do justice for all the people of Ohio. I am grateful for what I’ve learned from Ohioans in my many years of service to them, working at three levels of the state’s courts and as Ohio’s first female secretary of state. Administrative and policy leadership of the court is not about an ideology of who should win and who should lose. It is about a belief and understanding that courts are only as effective as people believe them to be. Good judges and fair courts can lift the confidence Ohioans have in their judiciary. And that confidence makes our courts more effective.
I know that courts can do good things for people—protect their health, safety and welfare—with fairness, equality and respect. And I am committed to doing this every day now and as Chief Justice of the Ohio Supreme Court. I am further committed to using the power of the court to help lift the vision of all judges of the state to why we serve and the power we have to do good for all Ohioans.
- I’m running for Chief Justice of the Ohio Supreme Court because justice matters for every Ohioan. I am currently a justice of the Ohio Supreme Court and have the administrative experience and a vision for leading all of Ohio's courts.
- Steady, experienced and principled leadership of the state’s highest court is essential to helping Ohioans realize justice in their everyday lives. Politics does not belong in courts. That's why every decision I've authored since being on the court has had bipartisan support.
- I know that courts can do good things for people—protect their health, safety and welfare—with fairness, equality and respect. And I am committed to doing this every day now and as Chief Justice of the Ohio Supreme Court.
My campaign is based on my vision for a justice system in Ohio that operates with accountability, openness and fairness to all and that promotes access to justice--a judicial campaign for and about people.
As the only candidate in the race who with experience managing a statewide office in Ohio and supervising local government activities in every county of this state, my policy agenda to lead Ohio’s judiciary as Ohio’s next Chief Justice is organized around this philosophy: "Courts belong to the people."
My vision to lead Ohio's courts embraces the principles of helping Ohioans have access to their courts while working with judges throughout Ohio as responsive public servants promoting fairness, equality and respect for all persons. Video of my remarks about my platform, given on September 14, 2021 at , is available on this campaign Website at https://www.justicebrunner.com/news/chief-justice-candidate-jennifer-brunner-unveils-vision-for-ohio-courts. I believe that when one person is helped, many benefit, and I am passionate about the ways our courts can help people when we work together with a common vision.
I look up to President John F. Kennedy, former U.S. Rep. Barbara Jordan and U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. President Kennedy inspired people like me to serve their country and helped promote public service as a noble calling. Barbara Jordan was fearless in the cause of fairness and good government and a trailblazer as the first black Congresswoman from Texas. Justice Ginsburg had a storied career even before she became a member of the nation's judiciary. She made equality for women more of a reality in my lifetime and served with honor and distinction as a member of the U.S. Supreme Court until her death.
Characteristics or principles most important for an elected official include a sense of public service, a dedication to promoting and protecting the rule of law, emphasizing fairness, equality and respect, an understanding of democratic principles, and caring about people and their safety.
I remember when Ohio's own John Glenn became the first man to orbit the earth in space and watched on television his capsule land in the ocean when I was a child and staying at my grandmother's house in rural Ohio.
My very first job was when I was 16 years old and still in high school. I had to have a work permit to be able to work under the age of 18. I was a typist in a typing pool in Columbus, Ohio, and typed addresses and phone numbers from small print documents, creating documents that would be scanned for mailing lists. Accuracy was required. I worked this job for about a year after school and in the summer, until I became a store clerk at Sears Department Store in Columbus, Ohio, again, while still in high school.
The Chief Justice is the superintendent of the Ohio's courts under the Ohio Supreme Court's Rules of Superintendence. The Chief determines the disqualification of judges who litigants may seek to disqualify from presiding over a case and names replacement judges on cases where judges recuse or are disqualified. The Chief names the judges to the Ohio Court of Claims and may address community and legal issues through the creation of task forces to recommend rules changes and other means to improve courts' operation.
My legal philosophy is that I am a jurist who is a public servant who desires to do a good job in protecting the rule of law and applying it impartially, with independence, demonstrating fairness, equality and respect for all persons in Thanks.at role.
As noted earlier, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Yes, since the law addresses human conditions and problems, an understanding of what they are in a variety of circumstances if valuable to good judgement.
Yes--Excellent. See: https://www.judge4yourself.com/candidate/jennifer-brunner-2/
My primary concern about today's legal system in Ohio is access to justice for people of all economic means is important. Greater access is more likely to promote public confidence, which improves public confidence, the lifeblood of an effective judiciary.
The Ohio Constitution provides the state's highest court, the Ohio Supreme Court, with certain authority to hold unconstitutional laws or rules or practices of other branches of the state's government, permitting citizens to give them no further effect.
Not always, especially for new judges. But for judges who have been in office for many years, the bar does have a more informed sense of how they perceive judges perform their roles.
Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.
2020
Jennifer L. Brunner completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2020. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Brunner's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.
| Collapse all
I serve as one of 8 state appeals court judges of the Tenth District Court of Appeals located in Franklin County, Ohio; previously served in elective office as a Common Pleas Judge (2000-2005) and Ohio Secretary of State (2007-2011). In 2008 I received the bipartisan John F. Kennedy Profile in Courage Award for public service as Secretary of State. In 2010, I was a candidate for the United States Senate. Previously, I was a principal at Brunner Quinn just prior to being elected to my current judicial position in 2014 and was reelected in 2016. Having founded my law firm in 1988 from the corner of my bedroom with young children, I hold 17 years private law practice experience as well as state government experience in the Ohio Senate and the Secretary of State's office as a staff attorney.
I have been privileged to assist foreign governments with rule of law and self-governance matters on behalf of the U.S. State Department through USAID, including anti-corruption and judicial reform consulting in the Republic of Serbia, election observation in the Arab Republic of Egypt and providing legal training in the Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka.
I have been married since 1978 to attorney Rick Brunner. We have three adult children and five grandchildren.
Under the state constitution's newly voter-adopted amendments for drawing new district lines for the state and designed to end Ohio's system of partisan gerrymandering, any Ohio Supreme Court review of newly drawn state legislative and Congressional districts should ensure fairness and faithfulness to the language of the Ohio Constitution.
The Ohio Supreme Court is in a strong position to work with Ohio courts and others in the state's criminal justice system to help end racism in that system, starting with a transparent, public database of criminal arrests, charges, prosecutions, convictions and sentencing by Ohio judges, according to demographic factors such as race, gender, LGBTQ, income zip code, education and more.
- Access to justice means many things: access for people who can't afford an attorney, giving people their day in court and not shortening the process with decisions that improperly deny a trial, and readily offering mediation for a satisfactory outcome for the parties and to reduce litigation costs.
I am running for the Ohio Supreme Court to provide good public service to the state in protecting and
strengthening the rule of law in Ohio. The people of Ohio speak through their state constitution, establishing the courts, but assigning to the legislature the expression of courts' jurisdiction. My philosophy is one of strict observance of the separation powers, so that the balance between those powers necessary for a healthy democracy is preserved and protected. I do not strive for popularity of my work, but rather, to protect the Ohio and U.S. constitutions and the rights afforded by them to the people. A ruling should not be result-oriented, but rather, one that looks to how the law may apply in the future for the greater good. For example, to deny an appeal to a bad actor, simply because what they have done is egregious, denies a future appeal to someone who needs it. As a judge and as a prospective justice, it is my duty to increase public confidence in the judiciary by protecting a fair and impartial rule of law, using judicial discretion wisely so the rule of law helps people and does not hurt them.
I look up to Congressman John Lewis and would like to follow his example of working tirelessly for fairness, equality and respect for all persons.
As a judge or as a justice of the Ohio Supreme Court, "political" philosophy, if one is held, is discarded in favor of carrying out the core responsibilities as described above in deciding cases before the court.
An elected official should have a strong commitment to public service for the greater good and to carrying out the duties of office in a fair and impartial manner and according to the law.
My father, born in 1933 at the height of the Great Depression, told me when I was child that if I was honest and worked hard, I would always "get by." I have found that those character traits are a simple but effective path to peace of mind and make it possible to do right by others. In fact, to me, they are authentic measure of success. When I served as Secretary of State I endured death threats, 7 weeks of being guarded by the Ohio High Patrol, a joint letter by the Speaker of the House and President of the Senate to boards of elections to not follow my directives, multiple lawsuits from conservative to liberal interests and more. My focus is and has been on public service, and when I my life is over, I will view my success according to how I have helped other people.
Judicial officers (justices, judges and magistrates) must be objective and open-minded. They must interpret and apply the law without regard to whether they approve or disapprove of the law in question, especially legislative or regulatory enactments. They must ensure that self-represented litigants have the opportunity to have their matters fairly heard, making reasonable accommodations to self-represented litigants consistent with the law. Judicial officers must avoid conduct that may reasonably be perceived as prejudiced or biased. They must decide cases according to the law and facts, without regard to whether particular laws or litigants are popular or unpopular with the public, the media, government officials, or the my friends or family.
Judicial officers in their public roles must not make any public statement that might reasonably be expected to affect the outcome or impair the fairness of a matter pending or impending in any court, or make any nonpublic statement that might substantially interfere with a fair trial or hearing. Nor may judicial officers in connection with cases, controversies, or issues that are likely to come before the court, make pledges, promises, or commitments that are inconsistent with the impartial performance of the adjudicative duties of judicial office.
That for the time I had the privilege of serving, I did all I could to make people's lives better. As a judge, I would be doing that by protecting and strengthening the rule of law for the people I served and doing it with both kindness and courage.
I was in first grade when President John F. Kennedy was assassinated. I was 6 years old. Someone came into our classroom when I was in reading group and told the teacher.
My very first job was in a typing pool while in high school, starting when I was 16 years old. I had my driver's license by then and worked after school and on weekends to earn my own money, beginning with buying my own clothes. I am the oldest of 4 children, and it helped out my parents. After about 6 months, I went to work at a Sears department store as a cashier while still in high school and through my early college years, and I also worked as a server at Frisch's Big Boy restaurant, as a secretary for my father's insurance agency, as a professor's assistant during college at Miami University and as a program monitor for the U.S.D.A. Summer Lunch Program in Columbus for the city Recreation and Parks Department. Just out of college and just married, I worked as a temporary secretary in Columbus and then was hired by the Ohio General Assembly to staff the Senate Transportation Committee, later being promoted to a legislative aide to a state senator. I started law school at night while working in the Ohio Senate.
Letters to a Young Poet by Rainer Maria Rilke, translated by Stephen Mitchell, because it speaks to the essence of being human. The book is essentially 10 letters written to a young man about to enter the German military. The young man, who was 19 years old, wrote to Rilke looking for guidance and a critique of some of his poems. Rilke was only 27 himself when he wrote his first letter to the young man. The result was a five-year correspondence about being be an artist and a person. I have given a copy to many young people.
I would want to be a location scout for movies. I'm not sure that such positions exist to do only that job-which is why I call it a fictional character-but it sure would be fun.
"Blue" by the Jayhawks.
My husband and I brought 3 extra children into our family life in the late 1990's to the end of 2000, who needed help. We took full custody of them, raising them along with our own three children. That was the hardest thing I have ever done. The experience taught me so many lessons, making me a better person and a better judge.
The Ohio Supreme Court's appeals are "discretionary." That means this court, the state's highest court, takes only the appeals it considers to be matters of great public importance. The court should not "duck" controversial or contentious issues, but instead courageously shoulder the burden of helping decide matters important to all of the public. That means a justice on the court should look at the issues objectively on behalf of the public and not according to his or her views either in support of or against an issue appealed to the court.
My legal philosophy is to protect the rule of law in our democracy, because it provides people with predictability, security and safety and can serve as a springboard for people to pursue their dreams for themselves, their families and their communities. Thus, I don't interpret to create a new meaning if the plain language is clear. Nor do I add language to statutes or rules coming from the legislative or executive branches of government. I stay in my judicial lane, exercising restraint, but having courage to do my job in applying law in such a way that it does not hurt people but increases their confidence in the rule of law, without stepping into the roles the other two branches. My basic philosophy of public service in general is to promote fairness, equality and respect for all persons.
In looking at the U.S. Supreme Court, I believe my views are similar to Justice Neil Gorsuch in that the constitution should be read according to its plain language with no overlayering of contemporary nuances that change its meaning or application. A good article to read on understanding Justice Gosuch's views is here: https://time.com/5670400/justice-neil-gorsuch-why-originalism-is-the-best-approach-to-the-constitution/ I agree with this particular philosophy.
Yes, because empathy aids understanding of the issues before the court. It also helps in showing respect to the parties for what they have suffered. Empathy aids in the tone of a decision to that it may be written according to the law yet show kindness and respect in doing so.
Yes, I have been rated as Acceptable (2000) as a trial judge candidate by the Columbus Bar Association, and Highly Recommended (2002) when running for reelection. In 2014, when I ran for my current position as a judge of the Ohio Tenth District Court of Appeals, I was rated by the Columbus Bar Association as Highly Recommended. When I ran for reelection in 2016 I was unopposed, so there was no rating. In 2020, as a candidate for the Ohio Supreme Court, the Asian American Bar Association rated me as Excellent, the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association rated me as Good, the Cuyahoga Criminal Defense Lawyers rated me as Excellent and the Norman S. Miner Bar Association rated me as Good. The Ohio State Bar Association rated me as Recommended.
Access to justice is critical. I strongly believe that the right to be heard is an essential component of access to justice. Substantive rights of litigants must be protected by observing procedures protecting the right to be heard and to simply protecting litigants' rights. Also, access to justice should include considerations of how the justice system can work to eliminate racism.
The Ohio Supreme Court may decide whether lower courts correctly applied the law or abused their discretion in determining the facts of the case. The state's high court also at times interprets state and sometimes federal law and constitutional provisions and their application to parties before it in resolving legal disputes. When U.S. constitutional issues are involved, the U.S. Supreme Court may become the final determining court.
No. They are subject, non-scientific and often not even statistically representative.
Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.
Noteworthy cases
Ohio Supreme Court limits Chevron deference (2023)
- See also: Chevron deference
The Ohio Supreme Court on December 29, 2022, ruled against applications of Chevron deference in the state. In TWISM Ents., L.L.C. v. State Bd. of Registration for Professional Engineers & Surveyors, the court found that state courts do not need to defer to state agency interpretations of the law—a deference doctrine known as Chevron deference at the federal level.[5]
Lower courts in TWISM deferred to the Ohio Board of Registration for Professional Engineers and Surveyors’ interpretation of its engineering certification rules, which denied TWISM Enterprises’ application to provide professional engineering services because the company’s designated licensed engineer was an independent contractor rather than an employee. TWISM Enterprises appealed the decision to the Ohio Supreme Court, arguing that the agency’s interpretation of the governing statute was flawed because the law does not specify that the licensed engineer must be an employee of the business.[5]
Justice Pat DeWine (with Justices Sharon L. Kennedy, Pat Fischer, and Michael P. Donnelly concurring) disagreed with the agency’s interpretation of the statute and argued that the judicial branch has the authority to determine whether the statutory interpretations of state agencies are lawful. DeWine, writing for the court, argued “that it is the role of the judiciary, not administrative agencies, to make the ultimate determination about what the law means. Thus, the judicial branch is never required to defer to an agency's interpretation of the law.” DeWine added that “an agency interpretation is simply one consideration a court may sometimes take into account in rendering the court's own independent judgment as to what the law is.”[5]
Justices Maureen O’Connor, Melody Stewart, and Jennifer Brunner concurred in the judgment only.[5]
State supreme court judicial selection in Ohio
- See also: Judicial selection in Ohio
The seven justices of the Ohio Supreme Court are selected through partisan primaries and partisan general elections. Previously, these judges were selected through partisan primaries and nonpartisan general elections, known as the Michigan method.[6][7][8]
All judges serve six-year terms, after which they are required to run for re-election if they wish to remain on the court.[8]
Qualifications
To serve on the Ohio Supreme Court, a judge must:
- have at least six years in the practice of law;
- be licensed to practice law in the state for at least one year preceding appointment or commencement of the judge's term;
- a judge of a court of record in any jurisdiction in the U.S.; and
- be under the age of 70.[9]
Chief justice
The chief justice of the Ohio Supreme Court is chosen by voters at large, serving a full six-year term in that capacity.[8]
Vacancies
In the event of a midterm vacancy, the governor appoints a replacement. The appointee serves until the next general election taking place 40 or more days after the vacancy occurred. If re-elected, the judge serves the remainder of his or her predecessor's unexpired term.[8]
In 2007, Governor Ted Strickland (D) issued an executive order creating a judicial appointment recommendation panel to assist in making new appointments. The panel evaluates applicants and advises the governor, but the governor is not bound to the panel's recommendations.[8] A similar system was established in 1972 under Governor Jack Gilligan (D), but it was abolished by Governor James A. Rhodes (R) three years later.[10]
The map below highlights how vacancies are filled in state supreme courts across the country.
See also
External links
.contact_entity {font-size: 1.5em ;margin-top: 0.6em; margin-bottom: 0em;margin-right: 0.5em;}
.contact_office { margin-top: 0.3em; margin-bottom: 0em;margin-right: 0.5em;}
.external_links_table { width: auto !important; }
@media (max-width:600px) {
.contact_entity {font-size: 1.0em ;margin-top: 0.6em; margin-bottom: 0em; margin-right: 0.5em;}
.contact_office { font-size: 0.8 em; margin-top: 0.6em; margin-bottom: 0em;margin-right: 0.5em;}
}
|
Candidate Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice |
Officeholder Ohio Supreme Court |
Personal |
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on September 7, 2020
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Jennifer Brunner For Judge, "About Jennifer Brunner," archived June 2, 2015
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Ohio Secretary of State, "2014 Election Results," archived May 2, 2015 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; name "elec" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ [Ohio Secretary of State candidate list, received by email]
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Supreme Court of Ohio, "TWISM Ents., L.L.C. v. State Bd. of Registration for Professional Engineers & Surveyors," December 29, 2022
- ↑ Ohio Secretary of State, “Ohio Candidate Requirement Guide,” accessed December 7, 2021
- ↑ Ohio General Assembly, “(Senate Bill Number 80),” accessed December 7, 2021
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 National Center for State Courts, "Methods of Judicial Selection: Ohio," accessed September 1, 2021
- ↑ Ohio Laws & Administrative Rules, "Section 2503.01 | Composition of supreme court; qualifications for justices.," accessed April 12, 2023
- ↑ University of Cincinnati College of Law, "Judicial Selection in Ohio: History, Recent Developments, and an Analysis of Reform Proposals," September 2003
Federal courts:
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals • U.S. District Court: Northern District of Ohio, Southern District of Ohio • U.S. Bankruptcy Court: Northern District of Ohio, Southern District of Ohio
State courts:
Ohio Supreme Court • Ohio District Courts of Appeal • Ohio Courts of Common Pleas • Ohio County Courts • Ohio Municipal Courts • Ohio Court of Claims
State resources:
Courts in Ohio • Ohio judicial elections • Judicial selection in Ohio
2022 categories 2020 categories
