ãƒãƒãƒ¼ã‚ティç·çµ±ã¨ãƒãƒ ãƒãƒ プリン社長ãŒçŽ‡ã„るサンリオå¸å›½ã€ä¸Šå ´æ¥é«˜å€¤ã®ã‚¹ãƒƒé«˜å€¤ã§æ ªã‚’下々ã«æ”¾æµã™ã‚‹ã“ã¨ã‚’決行
テレæ±ãŒç”Ÿæ”¾é€ã«æ—¥éŠ€ã®é»’ç”°ç·è£ã‚’æ‹›ã„ã¦ã€Œãã®ä¸€è¨€ãŒãƒžãƒ¼ã‚±ãƒƒãƒˆã‚’å‹•ã‹ã™ã€ã‚’実æ³ãƒ—レイ : 市æ³ã‹ã¶å…¨åŠ›ï¼’階建
ãƒãƒãƒ¼ã‚ティç·çµ±ã¨ãƒãƒ ãƒãƒ プリン社長ãŒçŽ‡ã„るサンリオå¸å›½ã€ä¸Šå ´æ¥é«˜å€¤ã®ã‚¹ãƒƒé«˜å€¤ã§æ ªã‚’下々ã«æ”¾æµã™ã‚‹ã“ã¨ã‚’決行
My experience with using cp to copy a lot of files (432 millions, 39 TB)
My experience with using cp to copy a lot of files (432 millions, 39 TB) Hi! I recently had to copy a lot of files and even though I've 20 years experience with various Unix variants I was still surprised by the behaviour of cp and I think my observations should be shared with the community. The setup: An old Dell server (2 cores, 2 GB initially, 10 GB later, running Ubuntu Trusty) with a new Dell
ã¿ã™ãšå¦è‹‘CMã®è¬Žã‚’解ã | äºˆå‚™æ ¡ãªã‚‰æ€’濤ã®è‹±èªžã€Œã¿ã™ãšå¦è‹‘ã€
ホーム» ã¿ã™ãšå¦è‹‘CMã®è¬Žã‚’解ã ã¿ã™ãšå¦è‹‘CMã®è¬Žã‚’解ã ã¿ã™ãšå¦è‹‘ã®åºƒå‘Šã‚„ï¼£ï¼ã¯ã€ãªãœæ¯Žå¹´ã€ã‚ã‚“ãªã«æ„味ä¸æ˜Žãªã®ã§ã™ã‹ï¼Ÿ ã‚ã‚“ãªCMを見ã¦ã€äºˆå‚™æ ¡ã¨ã—ã¦ã®ã¿ã™ãšå¦è‹‘ã«ã€æ¥ã‚‹ç”Ÿå¾’ãŒã„ã‚‹ã®ã§ã™ã‹ï¼Ÿ ヤマトタケルやã€ç¸„文太郎ã®ã‚ャラクターã¯ã€ã©ã†ã„ã†æ„味ãŒã‚ã‚‹ã®ã§ã™ã‹ï¼Ÿ Q. ã¿ã™ãšå¦è‹‘ã®åºƒå‘Šã‚„ï¼£ï¼ã¯ã€ãªãœæ¯Žå¹´ã€ã‚ã‚“ãªã«æ„味ä¸æ˜Žãªã®ã§ã™ã‹ï¼Ÿ ã¿ã™ãšå¦è‹‘ã®åºƒå‘Šã‚„CMã¯ã€ã©ã“ã«ã‚‚ãªã„ã‚‚ã®ã«ã—ã¦ã¾ã™ã€‚ãã‚Œã¯ã€22年間連続90％以上åˆæ ¼ã¨ã„ã†ã€åˆæ ¼çŽ‡ãŒã©ã“ã«ã‚‚ãªã„ã‚‚ã®ã ã‹ã‚‰ã§ã™ã€‚ã—ã‹ã—ã€å—験生ã§ãªã„ã®ã«ã€ã€Œã¿ã™ãšã®CMã®ãƒ•ã‚¡ãƒ³ã§ã™ã€ã¨ã€æ„Ÿæƒ³ã‚’寄ã›ã¦ä¸‹ã•ã‚‹æ–¹ã‚‚ãŸãã•ã‚“ã„ã¾ã™ã€‚ ã‚‚ã¡ã‚ã‚“ã€ä¸ã«ã¯ã€Œæ¯Žå¹´æ¯Žå¹´ã€åºƒå‘Šã®æ„味ãŒä¸æ˜Žã§ã™ã€ã€Œè¨³ãŒåˆ†ã‹ã‚Šã¾ã›ã‚“ã€ã€Œé•·ã„é–“ã®ç–‘å•ã€ã¨ã€ãŠã£ã—ゃる方もã„ã¾ã™ã€‚ã“ã‚Œã¾ã§ã€ãªãœã‚ã‚“ãªCMã«ã—ã¦ã‚‹ã‹ã€ç†ç”±ã¯å…¬ã«ã—ã¾ã›ã‚“ã§ã—ãŸã€‚ã—ã‹ã—ã€ä»Šå¹´ã¯ã€ãŸãã•ã‚“質å•ãŒæ¥ãŸã®ã§ã€ãã®è¨³ã‚’説
リリースã€éšœå®³æƒ…å ±ãªã©ã®ã‚µãƒ¼ãƒ“スã®ãŠçŸ¥ã‚‰ã›
最新ã®äººæ°—エントリーã®é…ä¿¡
j次ã®ãƒ–ックマーク
kå‰ã®ãƒ–ックマーク
lã‚ã¨ã§èªã‚€
eコメント一覧を開ã
oページを開ã
{{#tags}}- {{label}}
{{/tags}}