JVN#83881261: Ruby on Rails 用ライブラリ Paperclip ã«ãŠã‘るクãƒã‚¹ã‚µã‚¤ãƒˆã‚¹ã‚¯ãƒªãƒ—ティングã®è„†å¼±æ€§thoughtbot ãŒæä¾›ã™ã‚‹ Paperclip ã¯ã€Ruby on Rails ã§ãƒ•ã‚¡ã‚¤ãƒ«ã‚’アップãƒãƒ¼ãƒ‰ã™ã‚‹ãŸã‚ã®ãƒ©ã‚¤ãƒ–ラリã§ã™ã€‚Paperclip ã«ã¯ã€æ ¼ç´åž‹ã®ã‚¯ãƒã‚¹ã‚µã‚¤ãƒˆã‚¹ã‚¯ãƒªãƒ—ティング (CWE-79) ã®è„†å¼±æ€§ãŒå˜åœ¨ã—ã¾ã™ã€‚
Rails comparison CarrierWave vs. Paperclip vs. Dragonfly
Which should you use – CarrierWave, Paperclip or Dragonfly? Cloud-based storage has become incredibly cheap. Rails plugins like fog give you stupid simple cloud service integration. It’s no wonder there are some great libraries for integrating image manipulation with cloud uploading. Motivation This winter break, I’m hacking on a mongodb-backed refresh of GifURl, my handy-dandy database of user-up
Prevent Spoofing with Paperclip
Egor Homakov recently brought to my attention a slight problem with how Paperclip handles some content type validations. Namely, if an attacker puts an entire HTML page into the EXIF tag of a completely valid JPEG and named the file “gotcha.htmlâ€, they could potentially trick users into an XSS vulnerability. Now, this is kind of a convoluted means of attacking. It involves: A server that’s running
1
ランã‚ング
ランã‚ング
障害
リリースã€éšœå®³æƒ…å ±ãªã©ã®ã‚µãƒ¼ãƒ“スã®ãŠçŸ¥ã‚‰ã›
最新ã®äººæ°—エントリーã®é…ä¿¡
処ç†ã‚’実行ä¸ã§ã™
j次ã®ãƒ–ックマーク
kå‰ã®ãƒ–ックマーク
lã‚ã¨ã§èªã‚€
eコメント一覧を開ã
oページを開ã
JavaScript is not available.
{{#tags}}- {{label}}
{{/tags}}