ÐланиÑовалÑÑ ÐºÐ°Ðº ÑаÑÑÑ ÑкÑпозиÑии мÑзеÑ, но как вÑегда денÑги ÑаÑпилили и до завеÑÑаÑÑего ÑÑапа ÑÑо не доÑло. ÐолÑе внÑÑÑи. Ð¡Ð¾Ñ ÑанилиÑÑ ÑолÑко помеÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ ÑÑбки и неÑколÑко каÑÑ. СÑÐ´Ñ Ð¿Ð¾ вÑÐµÐ¼Ñ Ð² Ñеплое вÑÐµÐ¼Ñ Ð¾Ñ ÑанÑеÑÑÑ Ð¾Ñ Ñаной внÑÑÑи коÑаблÑ. ТепеÑÑ Ð½ÐµÐ¼Ð½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ инÑоÑмаÑии о коÑабле. «ÐРУÐÐЫл: [з/н 158]. 4.06.1973 г. заÑиÑлен в ÑпиÑки коÑаблей ÐÐФ и 12.10.1973 г. заложен на ÑÑапеле ÐÑибалÑийÑкого ССР«Я
Iâm sorry quinoa, but you are mistaken. Any evolutionary biologist will tell you that yes; genetic variation within natural populations is good for the overall survival of a species. However, this means nothing for the integrity of the genotype of an individual. I mean nothing; they could be well adapted for survival or unlikely to survive to reproduce. All the genetic variation within the populat
ã©ã³ãã³ã°
ã©ã³ãã³ã°
ã©ã³ãã³ã°
ãªãªã¼ã¹ãé害æ å ±ãªã©ã®ãµã¼ãã¹ã®ãç¥ãã
ææ°ã®äººæ°ã¨ã³ããªã¼ã®é ä¿¡
å¦çãå®è¡ä¸ã§ã
j次ã®ããã¯ãã¼ã¯
kåã®ããã¯ãã¼ã¯
lãã¨ã§èªã
eã³ã¡ã³ãä¸è¦§ãéã
oãã¼ã¸ãéã
{{#tags}}- {{label}}
{{/tags}}