You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. Dismiss alert
What We Know Our key takeaways from partnering with enterprise-level engineering teams. Details How We Ensure Success Our unique and personalized approach to help you achieve your business goals. Details Your SEI Platform Get to know your custom-designed Software Engineering Intelligence (SEI) platform. Details
JMESPath (pronounced "james path") allows you to declaratively specify how to extract elements from a JSON document. For example, given this document: {"foo": {"bar": "baz"}} The jmespath expression foo.bar will return "baz". JMESPath also supports: Referencing elements in a list. Given the data: {"foo": {"bar": ["one", "two"]}} The expression: foo.bar[0] will return "one". You can also reference
ffjson is a project I have been hacking on for making JSON serialization faster in the Go programing language. ffjson works by generating static code for Goâs JSON serialization interfaces. Fast binary serialization frameworks like Capân Proto or Protobufs also use this approach of generating code. Because ffjson is serializing to JSON, it will never be as fast as some of these other tools, but it
GWãå§ã¾ãã¾ããããéåã®GWã¯è¦³å 客å¤ããã¦éã«ä½æ°ã¯ãããªããã¦å¤ã«åºãªããªãæãã§ããã¨ã¯ããè·¯å°ã¾ã§è¦³å 客ãæ»ãè¾¼ãã§ãããã¨ã¯å°ãªãã®ã§ãè·¯å°ãæ£æ©ããåã«ã¯å¤©æ°ãããã¦ããæãã§ãããã¡ãªã¿ã«äººåè»ã®ãã«ã¼ããã¯ããããå³ã®ããè·¯å°ãç¥ãå°½ããã¦ããã®ã§äººåè»ã§ç§»åããã®ã¯ãããããªã¹ã¹ã¡ã§ã(ã¼ãã¯ä¹ã£ããã¨ãªããã©ããããªã¨ãããéããã !ãã£ã¦ã¨ããã§è¦ãããããã¾ã)ã ãã¦ãjqã¨ããã³ãã³ãããåãã§ããããã jq jq is a lightweight and flexible command-line JSON processor. ã¨æ¸ãã¦ããã¨ãããã³ãã³ãã©ã¤ã³ã§JSONãæ±ããã¨ãã§ããã³ãã³ãã§ããã§ãä»ã¾ãã«ä»äºã§å·¨å¤§JSONã¨æ¦ããã¨ãå¤ãããã®ã³ãã³ãã大活èºã§ãã ã¨ã¯ãããã¼ãã®ä½¿ãæ¹ã¨ãã¦ã¯ã巨大JSONããã¬ã¤ã«æ´å½¢ãã¦è¡¨ç¤ºãããã¨ã
JSON (JavaScript Object Notation)ã¯ãJavaScriptã«ããããªãã¸ã§ã¯ãã®è¡¨è¨æ³ããã¼ã¹ã¨ãã軽éãªãã¼ã¿è¨è¿°è¨èªã§ããç¾å¨ã§ã¯å¤ãã®è¨èªã§æ±ããããã«ãªããXMLã¨ä¸¦ãã§Webã§ã®ãã¼ã¿äº¤æã«ããå©ç¨ããããã¼ã¿è¨è¿°è¨èªã¨ãã£ã¦ããã§ãããã ãã®JSONã¨ãããã¯ããã¯ãçºè¦ãä¸ã«åºããã®ããYahoo!ã§Senior JavaScript Architectã®è©æ¸ããæã¤Douglas Crockfordæ°ã§ããééããªãJavaScriptã®ç¬¬ä¸äººè ã¨ããã¾ãã ãã®Crockfordæ°ãç»å ´ãããThe JSON Sagaãã¨é¡ãããã¬ã¼ã³ãã¼ã·ã§ã³ã®ãããªãYahoo! Developer Networkã§å ¬éããã¦ãã¾ããå½¼ãã©ã®ããã«JSONã"çºè¦"ããå®ç¾©ããã®ããXMLãJSONã¨ãã£ããã¼ã¿è¨è¿°è¨èªãã©ã®ããã«èãã¦ããã®ããå½¼
JSONViewãç¥ããªã人ã社å ã§ãã£ã±ãããã®ã§ãããã¯å®£ä¼ããã¨ä»ã«ã幸ãã«ãªãã人ãããããå± ãã ãããã¨ãããã¨ã§å®£ä¼ãã¦ã¿ãã è¿å¹´ãJSONå½¢å¼ã§ã¦ã§ãAPIãä½æããæ©ä¼ãå¢ãã¦ãããããããJSONã§åºåãããå ´åãæ¥æ¬èªã®æååã¯ã¨ã¹ã±ã¼ããããå®è£ ãå¤ã(ä»æ§çã«ã¯ã¨ã¹ã±ã¼ããã¦ãããªãã¦ãã©ã£ã¡ã§ããã)ãçµæãç®è¦ã§ç¢ºèªãããã¨ãã§ããªãã¦å°ãã¨ãããã¨ãããããã ãã®ãããJSON APIããããã¦ãã¼ã¹ãã¦åºåããã ãã®ã¹ã¯ãªãããããããRubyã§æ¸ããã¨ãããããªãã¨ãç¹°ãè¿ãã¦ããï¼åã«æ¸ããã¹ã¯ãªãããæ¢ããããæ°ããæ¸ããã»ããæ©ãã®ã ããããã§ãAPIã調ã¹ç´ãããã§3åãããã¯ãããï¼ã®ã ããJSONViewã¨ããæ¡å¼µã使ããã¨ã§ããã©ã¦ã¶ä¸ã§ã®JSONããXML風ã«è¦ãããæ´å½¢ãã¦ããããã¨ãããã£ãã以ä¸ã®ã¹ã¯ãªã¼ã³ã·ã§ããã«ãJSONVi
********************************************************************** This is YAJL 2. For the legacy version of YAJL see https://github.com/lloyd/yajl/tree/1.x ********************************************************************** Welcome to Yet Another JSON Library (YAJL) ## Why does the world need another C library for parsing JSON? Good question. In a review of current C JSON parsing libraries
åã®è¨äºã®ééããææãã¦ããã ãã¦ãããã°ãããè¨äºã§ããåã®è¨äºãããã¡ãã®è¨äºãã覧ãã ããã http://archive.guma.jp/2010/12/twitter-json.html å æ¥ã29æ¥ã®7æéãããã«Twitterã®ã¹ãã¼ã¿ã¹IDã53bitãè¶ãã¾ããã ãããªä¸éå端ãªãããæ°ãè¶ ããã ãã§ãªããããªè¨äºã«ãããã¨ããã¨ãä¸é¨ã®ã¯ã©ã¤ã¢ã³ãã§åä½ããããããªããã¨ãããããã§ãã (14:14ã追è¨ãã¾ãã) (14:31ããã²ã¨ã¤è¿½è¨ãã¾ãã) Twitterã®APIã¯XMLã¨JSONã®2種é¡ã§çµæãåå¾ã§ãã¾ãããã®ãã¡XMLã§å¦çãã¦ãå ´åã¯å é¨ã§64bit INTã§å¦çãã¦ããã°ç¹ã«åé¡ã¯èµ·ãã¾ããã åé¡ãèµ·ããã®ã¯JSONã®å ´åã§ããJSONã¯Javascriptã§evalããã°ãã®ã¾ã¾ä¸èº«ãåãåºãããã¨ããããããããã«ãJavascript
JSON is a data interchange format. It is used in the transmission of data between machines. Since it carries only data, it is security-neutral. The security of systems that use JSON is determined by the quality of the design of those systems. JSON itself introduces no vulnerabilities. The web browser is a peculiar application environment. The security model of the browser was forged through a long
Strange spate of discussion recently about XML vs. JSON. On M. David Peterson's Weblog he states what I think is the obvious: there is no serious battle between XML and JSON. They're entirely complementary. Mike Champion responds: The same quite rational response could be given about the "war" between WS-* and REST, but that has caused quintillions of electrons to change state in vain for the last
æ¥æ¬äººã§å¯ä¸W3Cã®XMLã¯ã¼ãã³ã°ã°ã«ã¼ãã«åå ãXMLã®æ¨æºåããã»ã¹ã«æºãã£ãXMLã®çã¿ã®è¦ªãæç°çããã®ããã°ã§ãã XMLã¨JSON æè¿ã¯ãXMLã«å¯¾æããæè¡ã¨ãã¦JSONãèããã¨ãå¢ãã¦ããã ç§ã¯ãJSONã«ã¾ã£ããå対ããªããJSONã¯ãããã°ã©ã å ã§ç¨ãããããã¼ã¿ã®ããããããããã¹ã表ç¾ã§ãããã¨ã«å¾¹ãã¦ãããXMLã®ã»ããããæ±ç¨çï¼ã¨ãã«ææ¸ç¨ï¼ã§æ¡å¼µæ§ãããããJSONã®ã»ããããå¹ççãªå ´åããããã¨ã¯çããªããæ£ç´è¨ãã¨ãJSONãXMLã®è·ãè©ä»£ãããã¦ãããã»ãããç§ã«ã¯æé£ããããã§ããï¼W3C XML Schemaã§æ±ããç¯å²ã®XMLã¯ãç¸å½JSONã«ä¾µé£ãããã ãããï¼ã ãªãããã®ã¨ã³ããªã¯ãTim Brayã®è¨äºããã£ããã¨ãã¦æ¸ãããXMLé£å¶ã§JSONãå¦å®ãã人ã¯èª°ãããªãã¨Tim Brayã¯è¨ãããããªãã®ã ããã¨ç§ãæãã 追
ã©ã³ãã³ã°
ã©ã³ãã³ã°
ã©ã³ãã³ã°
ãªãªã¼ã¹ãé害æ å ±ãªã©ã®ãµã¼ãã¹ã®ãç¥ãã
ææ°ã®äººæ°ã¨ã³ããªã¼ã®é ä¿¡
å¦çãå®è¡ä¸ã§ã
j次ã®ããã¯ãã¼ã¯
kåã®ããã¯ãã¼ã¯
lãã¨ã§èªã
eã³ã¡ã³ãä¸è¦§ãéã
oãã¼ã¸ãéã
{{#tags}}- {{label}}
{{/tags}}