Elixir vs Ruby Showdown - Part One | Littlelines
We’ve taken a huge interest in Elixir here at the Littlelines office this year. I gave a 3.5 hour into to Elixir workshop at RailsConf in April, and have been busy building Phoenix, an Elixir Web Framework. Earlier this week, I put together Linguist, an Elixir internationalization library and was shocked at how little code it required after taking a look at the Ruby implementation. By using Elixir
Elixir vs Ruby Showdown - Phoenix vs Rails | Littlelines
This is the second post in our Elixir vs Ruby Showdown series. In this latest installment, we’re exploring the performance of the Phoenix and Rails web frameworks when put up against the same task. Before we get into code samples and benchmark results, let’s answer a few common questions about these kinds of tests: tl;dr Phoenix showed 10.63x more throughput over Rails when performing the same tas
Yajlã£ã¦é€Ÿã„ã®ï¼Ÿ - Qiita
require "benchmark" require "yajl" require "json" BENCH_TIMES = 100000 hash = { s:"string", ss:["strings"] * 3, n:10, ns:(0..100).to_a.sample(20) } json = hash.to_json Benchmark.bmbm do |bm| bm.report("encode with yajl") do BENCH_TIMES.times do encoder = Yajl::Encoder.new encoder.encode(hash) end end bm.report("encode with yajl 2") do BENCH_TIMES.times do Yajl::Encoder.encode(hash) end end bm.repo
JSONã®æ›¿ã‚ã‚Šã«ä½¿ã£ãŸOJãŒé€Ÿã„ - Qiita
ã“ã®ã¾ãˆã€æ¨™æº–ã®JSONクラスã®æ›¿ã‚ã‚Šã«Yajlを使ã£ã¦ã¿ãŸã®ã§ã™ãŒã€ ã‚‚ã£ã¨é€Ÿã„ã¨å™‚ã®OJ( Optimized JSON)ã§ãƒ™ãƒ³ãƒãƒžãƒ¼ã‚¯ã‚’å–ã£ã¦ã¿ã¾ã—ãŸã€‚ https://github.com/ohler55/oj çµæžœã¯ä»¥ä¸‹ã®é€šã‚Šã€‚ サンプルã«ã—ãŸjsonデータã¯ä»•äº‹ã§ä½¿ã£ã¦ã„ã‚‹ã®ã§æ™’ã›ãªã„ã®ã§ã™ãŒã€500è¡Œãらã„ã‚ã‚Šã¾ã™ã€‚ エンコードãŒåœ§å€’çš„ã«é€Ÿã„ã§ã™ãï¼ã€€Yajlã§ã¯å·®ãŒå‡ºãªã‹ã£ãŸãƒ‡ã‚³ãƒ¼ãƒ‰ã‚‚ã ã„ã¶é€Ÿã„ã§ã™ã€‚ Rehearsal ---------------------------------------------------- encode with oj 4.900000 0.040000 4.940000 ( 5.251580) encode with json 38.770000 0.250000 39.020000 ( 41.966557) -------------
GitHub - acangiano/ruby-benchmark-suite: A set of Ruby benchmarks for testing Ruby implementations.
The Ruby Benchmark Suite is a suite for measuring the performance of Ruby implementations, including micro-benchmarks that focus on core Ruby functionalities, as well as macro-benchmarks that represent a variety of real, common workloads. The project is aimed at providing a useful suite for comparing the performance of the available Ruby implementations and, as a positive side effect, to give VM i
AnTuTu Benchmark - Apps on Google Play
AnTuTu benchmark is the most popular Android smartphone and tablet benchmarking app in the world! ☆ Over 100,000,000 users ☆ Benchmark app used during Google I/O 2014 ☆ No.1 benchmark app, used as an industry standard by leading technology companies and hardware review sites. With the Click and Go test suite, Antutu will comprehensively test all aspects of a device, including UX, GPU, RAM, CPU, I/
AnTuTuベンãƒãƒžãƒ¼ã‚¯ãŒå¤§å¹…刷新。スコアãŒã‚ˆã‚Šæ£ç¢ºã«ï¼Ÿ
AnTuTuベンãƒãƒžãƒ¼ã‚¯ã®ãƒãƒ¼ã‚¸ãƒ§ãƒ³3.0ãŒãƒªãƒªãƒ¼ã‚¹ã•ã‚Œã€ãƒ™ãƒ³ãƒå½¢å¼ã‚„スコア特典ãŒå¤§ãã刷新ã•ã‚Œã¾ã—ãŸã€‚ スコアã¯ã‚ˆã‚Šæ£ç¢ºã«ãªã£ãŸã‚ˆã†ã«è¦‹ãˆã€S4 APQ8064＞Exynos 4412＞Tegra 3ã¨ã„ã†ã‚¯ã‚¢ãƒƒãƒ‰ã‚³ã‚¢ã®åºåˆ—ã‚’æ£ç¢ºã«åæ˜ ã—ã¦ã„るよã†ã«è¦‹ãˆã¾ã™ã€‚ãŸã スコア傾å‘ã¯å¤§ãã変ã‚ã£ãŸã®ã§ã€å¾“æ¥ã®ã‚¹ã‚³ã‚¢ã¨æ¯”較ã™ã‚‹äº‹ã¯é›£ã—ãã†ã§ã™ã€‚(新ベンãƒã«ãŠã‘ã‚‹Optimus G LGL21ã®ã‚¹ã‚³ã‚¢ã¯ã€Œ22166ã€ã‚’超ãˆã¦ã„ã‚‹) アイコンやUIも変更ã•ã‚ŒãŠã‚Šã€2ã¤ã®ãƒ‡ãƒã‚¤ã‚¹ã®ã‚¹ã‚³ã‚¢ã‚’比較ã™ã‚‹æ©Ÿèƒ½ã‚‚æ載ã•ã‚Œã¾ã—ãŸã€‚ æƒ…å ±å…ƒï¼šAnTuTu
クアッドコアCPUæ載ã®Snapdragon「APQ8064ã€ã®ãƒ™ãƒ³ãƒãƒžãƒ¼ã‚¯ã‚’試ã™â€•â€•Tegra 3ã¨ã®å·®ã¯ï¼Ÿ
QualcommãŒ7月24日（ç¾åœ°æ™‚間）ã€ç±³ã‚µãƒ³ãƒ•ãƒ©ãƒ³ã‚·ã‚¹ã‚³ã§ãƒ¡ãƒ‡ã‚£ã‚¢å‘ã‘ã«ã€ŒQualcomm Mobile Benchmarking Workshopã€ã‚’開催ã—ãŸã€‚今回ã®ã‚¤ãƒ™ãƒ³ãƒˆã§ã¯ã€QualcommãŒæ¬¡æœŸãƒ—ãƒã‚»ãƒƒã‚µãƒ¼ã¨ã—ã¦æŠ•å…¥ã‚’予定ã—ã¦ã„ã‚‹Snapdragon「APQ8064ã€ã‚’æ載ã—ãŸãƒªãƒ•ã‚¡ãƒ¬ãƒ³ã‚¹ãƒ¢ãƒ‡ãƒ«ï¼ˆAndroidタブレット）を披露ã—ã€è¨˜è€…ãŒãƒ™ãƒ³ãƒãƒžãƒ¼ã‚¯ã‚’試ã›ã‚‹å ´ãŒè¨ã‘られãŸã€‚ APQ8064ã¨ç¾è¡ŒSnapdragon S4ã¨ã®é•ã„ã¯ï¼Ÿ APQ8064ã¯ã€ç¬¬4世代Snapdragonã§ã‚る「Snapdragon S4ã€ã«å«ã¾ã‚Œã‚‹ã‚¢ãƒ—リケーションプãƒã‚»ãƒƒã‚µãƒ¼ã®1ã¤ã€‚Snapdragon S4ã¯æ€§èƒ½ã«å¿œã˜ã¦ã€ŒPlayã€ã€ŒPlusã€ã€ŒProã€ã€ŒPrimeã€ã¨ã„ã†4ã¤ã®ã‚«ãƒ†ã‚´ãƒªãƒ¼ã«åˆ†ã‘られã¦ãŠã‚Šã€APQ8064ã¯ãã®ä¸ã®Proã«å«ã¾ã‚Œã‚‹ã€‚日本ã®å¤ãƒ¢ãƒ‡ãƒ«ã¨ã—ã¦ç™ºå£²ä¸ï¼ˆäºˆå®šï¼‰ã®LTEスマート
サービス終了ã®ãŠçŸ¥ã‚‰ã› - NAVER ã¾ã¨ã‚
サービス終了ã®ãŠçŸ¥ã‚‰ã› NAVERã¾ã¨ã‚ã¯2020å¹´9月30日をもã¡ã¾ã—ã¦ã‚µãƒ¼ãƒ“ス終了ã„ãŸã—ã¾ã—ãŸã€‚ ç´„11å¹´é–“ã€NAVERã¾ã¨ã‚ã‚’ã”利用・ã”愛顧ã„ãŸã ãèª ã«ã‚ã‚ŠãŒã¨ã†ã”ã–ã„ã¾ã—ãŸã€‚
shelves/rubyist-magazine/0025-appbench at 9cdfd56089bae3c61f2fe25d2f568f79b1cc7589 · kwatch/shelves
ã‚‹ã³ã¾
『るã³ã¾ã€ã¯ã€Ruby ã«é–¢ã™ã‚‹æŠ€è¡“記事ã¯ã‚‚ã¡ã‚ã‚“ã®ã“ã¨ã€Rubyist ã¸ã®ã‚¤ãƒ³ã‚¿ãƒ“ューやエッセイã€ãã®ä»–ã‚’ãŠå±Šã‘ã™ã‚‹ã‚¦ã‚§ãƒ–雑誌ã§ã™ã€‚ Rubyist Magazine ã«ã¤ã„㦠『Rubyist Magazineã€ã€ç•¥ã—ã¦ã€Žã‚‹ã³ã¾ã€ã¯ã€æ—¥æœ¬ Ruby ã®ä¼šã®æœ‰å¿—ã«ã‚ˆã‚‹ Rubyist ã® Rubyist ã«ã‚ˆã‚‹ã€Rubyist ã¨ãã†ã§ãªã„人ã®ãŸã‚ã®ã‚¦ã‚§ãƒ–雑誌ã§ã™ã€‚ æœ€æ–°å· Rubyist Magazine 0058 å· ãƒãƒƒã‚¯ãƒŠãƒ³ãƒãƒ¼ Rubyist Magazine 0058 å· RubyKaigi 2018 ç›´å‰ç‰¹é›†å· Rubyist Magazine 0057 å· RubyKaigi 2017 ç›´å‰ç‰¹é›†å· Rubyist Magazine 0056 å· Rubyist Magazine 0055 å· Rubyist Magazine 0054 å· æ±äº¬ Ruby ä¼šè° 11 ç›´
A-newcomer.com
This Domain Has Expired, To Renew Please Contact Your Provider.
Rubyã®ã‚¯ãƒãƒ¼ã‚¸ãƒ£ã¨forã¨eachã¨1.8ã¨1.9 - mirichiã®æ—¥è¨˜
Rubyã«ã¯ã‚¯ãƒãƒ¼ã‚¸ãƒ£ã¨è¨€ã†ã‚‚ã®ãŒã‚る。 よã†ã™ã‚‹ã«æ‰‹ç¶šãオブジェクトã§ã€Proc.newãªã©ã§ä½œã‚‹ã“ã¨ãŒã§ãる。 ã“ã„ã¤ã®ãƒã‚¤ãƒ³ãƒˆã¯ã€ãã‚ŒãŒä½œã‚‰ã‚ŒãŸç’°å¢ƒï¼ˆãƒãƒ¼ã‚«ãƒ«å¤‰æ•°ã¨ã‹ï¼‰ã®ã‚¹ã‚³ãƒ¼ãƒ—ã¨å€¤ã‚’ä¿æŒã™ã‚‹ã¨ã“ã‚ã 。環境を閉ã˜è¾¼ã‚ã‚‹ã‹ã‚‰ã‚¯ãƒãƒ¼ã‚¸ãƒ£ã¨ã„ã†ã€‚らã—ã„。 array = [] (0..2).each do |i| array.push(Proc.new {i}) end p array[0].call # => 0 p array[1].call # => 1 p array[2].call # => 2 array = [] for i in 0..2 array.push(Proc.new {i}) end p array[0].call # => 2 p array[1].call # => 2 p array[2].call # => 2 上ã®ã‚³ãƒ¼ãƒ‰ã§ã¯(0..2).eachã—ã¦ã„
ランã‚ング
ランã‚ング
ランã‚ング
リリースã€éšœå®³æƒ…å ±ãªã©ã®ã‚µãƒ¼ãƒ“スã®ãŠçŸ¥ã‚‰ã›
最新ã®äººæ°—エントリーã®é…ä¿¡
j次ã®ãƒ–ックマーク
kå‰ã®ãƒ–ックマーク
lã‚ã¨ã§èªã‚€
eコメント一覧を開ã
oページを開ã
GitHub - evanphx/benchmark-ips: Provides iteration per second benchmarking for Ruby
rubinius/benchmark at master · rubinius/rubinius · GitHub
Which are faster? | Computer Language Benchmarks Game
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.aurorasoftworks.quadrant.ui.standard&feature=search_result
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.quicinc.vellamo&feature=search_result
http://android-benchmark.com/
proposal: merge x64-mswin64 port
{{#tags}}- {{label}}
{{/tags}}