You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. Dismiss alert
A benchmark for a variety of spin-lock implementation using x86 primitives. These variations are as follows: * lock_none.h To provide baseline perfor mance compared to other implementation. * lock_tas.h Naive spin-lock implementaiont with test-and-set('xchg'). * lock_tas_nopause.h Based on lock_tas.h, 'pause' is removed. * lock_tas_mov.h Based on lock_tas.h, lock_release() is improved with 'mov' t
ãã®å調ã¹ãã¨ããã¦ããã¨ãã«pthread_spinlockãªããã®ããããã¨ãç¥ã£ãï¼ ãã®æã«pthread_mutex_lockã¨ã©ã¡ãã使ãã°ãããã ããï¼ã¨çåã«æã£ãã®ã§å°ã調ã¹ã¦ã¿ãï¼ çµæããè¨ãã°ï¼ããã¦ãã®å ´åã¯pthread_mutex_lockã§è¯ãï¼ã¨ããå®æãªçµæã«ãªã£ã¦ãã¾ã£ãï¼ /*--- 以ä¸è©³ç´° ---*/ ä¸è¬è«ã§ã¯ããã¯æéãçãã¨ãã«spinlockã®ã»ããè¯ããã¨ããããã®ã§æéãçãããã¯ã«ãããç°¡åãªæ§è½è©ä¾¡ãè¡ã£ãï¼ ä½¿ã£ãããã°ã©ã ã¯ä»¥ä¸ï¼ https://github.com/maropu/lockbench åä¸ã¢ãã¬ã¹ä¸ã«åå¨ããå¤ãåæçã«ã¤ã³ã¯ãªã¡ã³ãããã ãã®ç°¡åãªããã°ã©ã ï¼è©ä¾¡ææ¨ã¯threadæ°ï¼# of threads/x-axisï¼ãå¤åãããå ´åã®ï¼clock()ãè¿ãåä½tickãããã®å¹³åã¤ã³ã¯ãªã¡ã³ãåæ°ï¼
GNU/Linux ã§ã®ã¹ã¬ããããã°ã©ãã³ã° NPTL (Native POSIX Thread Library) Programming. 以åãã GNU/Linux ã§ã¹ã¬ããããã°ã©ãã³ã°ãããããã®ç°¡åãªã¬ã¤ããæ¸ãããã¨æã£ã¦ãã¾ãããä»æ´ã¹ã¬ããããã°ã©ãã³ã°ã«ã¤ãã¦æ¸ãã¦ãç®æ°ãããã®ã«ãªãã¨ã¯æããªãã®ã§ãããåã㦠NPTL (Native POSIX Thread Library) ã使ã£ãããã°ã©ã ãããã¨ããæ¹ã«ã¯ãããããããå½¹ã«ç«ã¤æ å ±ããããã¾ãããã¯ããã¯æã å°ããªããã°ã©ã ãæ¸ãã¦åããã¦ã¿ããæã£ãããç°¡åãªãã¨ã«é©ãããã§ããããã¹ã¬ããããã°ã©ãã³ã°ã¨è¨ã£ã¦ãé£ãããã¨ã¯ãªã«ãããã¾ãããã©ã¤ãã©ãªã沢山ä»äºããã¦ãããããã§å¿«é©ã«ä½¿ããã¨ãã§ãã¾ãã æ¬æä¸ã§ã¯ glibc ã®ãã¼ã¸ã§ã³ã«ããéãã«ã¤ãã¦ã触ãã¾ããåç §ãããã¼ã¸ã§ã³ã¯ gli
read write lock ã£ã¦ãã®ãããã¾ãã pthread ã 㨠pthread_rwlock_t ãã³ã¬ã®ç§ã®æã£ã¦ãã»ãã³ãã£ã¯ã¹ã¯ä»¥ä¸ã®ãããªããã§ãã writer lock ãåãã¨æ®éã® mutex lock ã¿ãããªæãããã® thread ã unlock ããã¾ã§ã以éã® reader lock 㨠writer lock 㯠block ããã reader lock ãåãã¨ããã以éã® writer lock 㯠block ããã reader lock 㯠block ããã«åãã ãã㯠glibc ã® pthread ã®ããã©ã«ãã®æåãªãã§ãããããã¯å¤ãããããã POSIX ã«ããã¨ç°å¢ã«ãã£ã¦éãæåããããã¨ãããããããã£ã¦ã®ãç¥ãã¾ããã§ããã ã©ãããæã®æåãå¤ãããã¨ããã¨ã reader lock ãåããã¦ã¦ã writer
This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. Please help improve it to make it understandable to non-experts, without removing the technical details. (January 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this message) In a multithreaded computing environment, hazard pointers are one approach to solving the problems posed by dynamic memory management of the nodes in a lock-free data str
Libtask: a Coroutine Library for C and Unix write event-driven programs without the hassle of events! available for FreeBSD, Linux, OS X, and Solaris libtask.tar.gz 386-ucontext.h clock.c power-ucontext.h taskimpl.h COPYRIGHT context.c primes.c tcpproxy.c Makefile fd.c print.c testdelay.c README httpload.c qlock.c testdelay1.c amd64-ucontext.h makesun rendez.c asm.S mips-ucontext.h task.c channel.
Why Threads Are A Bad Idea (for most purposes) John Ousterhout Sun Microsystems Laboratories [email protected] http://www.sunlabs.com/~ouster Introduction Ï Ï Ï Ï Threads: â Grew up in OS world (processes). â Evolved into user-level tool. â Proposed as solution for a variety of problems. â Every programmer should be a threads programmer? Problem: threads are very hard to program. Alt
CACM Web Account Membership in ACM includes a subscription to Communications of the ACM (CACM), the computing industry's most trusted source for staying connected to the world of advanced computing. Sign In Sign Up Most parallel programs today are written using threads and shared variables. Although there is no consensus on parallel programming models, there are a number of reasons why threads rem
Russ Cox http://swtch.com/~rsc/talks/ Second International Plan 9 Workshop December 2007 Introduction Two popular camps for designing concurrent programs. Threads with locks Birrell, âAn introduction to programming with threadsâ Top-level select loops with events Ousterhout, âWhy threads are a bad idea (for most purposes)â Should we use threads or events? Andrew Birrell: threads. John Ousterhout:
ãªãªã¼ã¹ãé害æ å ±ãªã©ã®ãµã¼ãã¹ã®ãç¥ãã
ææ°ã®äººæ°ã¨ã³ããªã¼ã®é ä¿¡
å¦çãå®è¡ä¸ã§ã
j次ã®ããã¯ãã¼ã¯
kåã®ããã¯ãã¼ã¯
lãã¨ã§èªã
eã³ã¡ã³ãä¸è¦§ãéã
oãã¼ã¸ãéã
{{#tags}}- {{label}}
{{/tags}}