Chapter III

Chapter III

METHODOLOGY

This chapter presents the procedures that the researchers undergone in the conduct

of this study. This includes the following: research design, respondents and locale of the
study, sampling technique, data gathering instruments and data gathering procedures.
Research Design
This study will utilize descriptive-correlational method of research to determine
the relationship of Class Performance Tasks and Anxiety of Senior High School students
of Talisay Integrated School in SY 2022-2023. In this study, it describes the level of
Class Performance Tasks of Senior High School Learners in terms of Role Play, Oral
Recitation, and Reporting and the student’s level of Anxiety in terms of Social and
Academic. Moreover, it will determine whether there is a relationship between the Class
Performance Tasks and Anxiety of Senior High School students of Talisay Integrated
School. The data on the Class Performance Tasks of Student's will be assessed based on
questionnaire that was given within the School Year 2022-2023 and Student’s Anxiety
Level was also taken based on questionnaire.
Respondents of the Study
In this study, the research participants are fifty (50) students of Senior High
School of Talisay Integrated School and were randomly selected by the researchers. The
table below showed the distribution of respondents per track and strand:
14
Table 1
Distribution of Respondents
Section Population No. of Respondents
11-HUMSS 50 25
12-HUMSS 47 25
Total 97 50
Locale of the Study
The study was conducted around the vicinity of Talisay Integrated School,
Barangay Talisay, Lake Sebu, South Cotabato.
Research Instruments
The research instrument used in this study was the researcher-made
questionnaires. The survey form has two purposes, to determine the level of Class
Performance Tasks and the Student’s level of Anxiety. In the questionnaire, the
participants must answer the following question with regards to their moral, spiritual,
social, academic and also to their self, family, and community.
Data Gathering Procedures
15
These procedures were done through a series of process that the researchers made
to utilize and came to their conclusions. The most important thing to conduct this kind of
study is to get the approval and permission of the School Principal, Madam Arlen T.
Apacicle, Principal-I, together with her assistant principal Madam Marilou M. Centina.
After getting the approval, the researchers made a questionnaire. Then, the questionnaire
was validated by the three expert teachers of Talisay Integrated School namely, Mrs.
Sheryl C. Tesoro, Mrs. Lucille C. Otañes, Mr. Raymart H. Agana to identify if there is
incorrect in the questionnaire or if it is precise. After the validation, the researchers had
chosen their respondents through random sampling. Before the questionnaire was given,
the researchers read first the letter to the respondents asking for their permission to
participate in the research study. Before the respondents started to answer the
questionnaire, the researchers explained first the content of the questionnaire and the
directions on how to properly accomplish it. Then respondents were now ready to answer
the questionnaire. After that, the questionnaire were gathered by the researchers ready for
tabulation and statistics.
Statistical Treatment
16
To evaluate the level of Student's Class Performance, weighted mean was used.
The total rating was described by using the Likert’s scale.
Range of
Scale Verbal Description Interpretation
mean
The Student's Class Performance is very
5 4.21-5.0 Very High
high
4 3.41-4.20 High The Student's Class Performance is high
The Student's Class Performance is
3 2.61-3.40 Moderate
moderate
2 1.81-2.60 Low The Student's Class Performance is low
The Student's Class Performance is very
1 1.00-1.80 Very Low
low
To evaluate the Student's Level of Anxiety , weighted mean was used. The total
rating was described by using the Likert’s scale.
Range of
Scale Verbal Description Interpretation
mean
The Student’s Level of Anxiety is very
5 4.21-5.0 Very High
high
4 3.41-4.20 High The Student’s Level of Anxiety is high
The Student’s Level of Anxiety is
3 2.61-3.40 Moderate
moderate
2 1.81-2.60 Low The Student’s Level of Anxiety is low
The Student’s Level of Anxiety is very
1 1.00-1.80 Very Low
low
Finally, to answer sub-problem 3, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation
Coefficient (r) was utilized to determine if there is a relationship between the Class
17
Performance Tasks of Student's and the Student’s Level of Anxiety in Talisay Integrated
School. To interpret the correlation value (r) that will be given in the study the following
classification was adopted from Calmorin (1995).
Range Interpretation
An r from±0.00 to±0.20 denotes negligible correlation
An r from±0.21 to±0.40 denotes low or slight relationship
An r from±0.41 to±0.70 denotes mark relationship
An r from±0.71 to±0.90 denotes high relationship
An r from±0.91 to±0.99 denotes very high relationship
An r from±1.oo denotes perfect correlation
The hypothesis was tested at 0.05 level of significance.
18

Chapter III

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chapter III

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chapter III

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chapter III

This study will utilize descriptive-correlational method of research to determine

of Talisay Integrated School in SY 2022-2023. In this study, it describes the level of

Level was also taken based on questionnaire.

Respondents of the Study

Section Population No. of Respondents

Locale of the Study

Barangay Talisay, Lake Sebu, South Cotabato.

The research instrument used in this study was the researcher-made

social, academic and also to their self, family, and community.

Data Gathering Procedures

tabulation and statistics.

The total rating was described by using the Likert’s scale.

rating was described by using the Likert’s scale.

Finally, to answer sub-problem 3, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation

classification was adopted from Calmorin (1995).

The hypothesis was tested at 0.05 level of significance.

You might also like