Chem 26.1 - Mock Formal Report
Chem 26.1 - Mock Formal Report
Chem 26.1 - Mock Formal Report
1 (2018) P a g e |1
ABSTRACT
This experiment aims to describe chemical kinetics and to present the effects of concentration,
temperature and addition of catalyst in the rate of reactions. The effect of concentration was determined
by varying the concentration of I- and S2O82- for different trials and keeping the concentration of S2O32-
constant. It was found out that concentration has a directly proportional relationship to the rate of
reaction. Using the method of initial rates, it was determined that the overall reaction is at second order.
The effect of temperature was observed by exposing set of solutions with similar concentration to
different temperature conditions and it was concluded that the rate of reaction increases as temperature
increases. The effect of catalyst was also investigated by adding a catalyst Cu(II) from CuSO4 in a solution
and it was found out that it speeds up the rate of reaction.
A catalyst provides an alternative reaction timer was started once the contents of beaker
pathway of lower activation energy [3]. Looking “A” mixed with contents of beaker “B” and was
at the Arrhenius Equation (Equation 3), stopped once the solution turned blue. The runs
lowering the activation energy will increase the were conducted one or two at time due to
value of k. High value of k results into a faster limited number of beakers. A video recorder
reaction hence, a catalyst speeds up a reaction. was used instead of a stopwatch so the solution
Catalyst are consumed in the first part of the can be timed and observed at the same time
reaction steps but is produced in an equal hence, reducing the manpower needed.
amount in the latter part therefore, its chemical
formula does not appear in the overall reaction. Two more sets of Run 2 were prepared for the
second part of the experiment. Those sets are
The Iodine Clock Reaction Experiment aims to referred as Set 2 and Set 3 respectively. Beakers
observe and determine the effects of “A” and “B” of Set 2 was heated on hot bath and
concentration, particularly of iodide (I-) and when the temperature of the solutions reaches
persulfate (S2O82-), temperature, and presence of around 50oC (323.15 K), contents of beaker A
catalyst like Cu(II) in the rate of a reaction. The was poured to beaker B. The recorder was
rate of I2 formation will be measured in order to started immediately and was paused when the
calculate for the reaction rates. solution turned blue.
Equation 4. This reaction mechanism will only It can be also observed that the rate heavily
come to a halt once the thiosulfate ions, which relies on the reaction order with respect to [A]
are the limiting reactant, are all used up. Free I2 and [B]. The reaction order can be obtained by
molecules that didn’t react with thiosulfate will getting the slope of the ln(concentration) versus
now react with the starch hence, forming the ln(rate) graph. For this experiment, we will
deep blue complex. From this indicator, we can generate the ln[S2O82-] versus ln(rate) and the
calculate the rate of I2 formation. ln[I-] versus ln(rate) graph. The ln[S2O32-] vs.
ln(rate) graph will not be generated since the
Table 2. The Effect of Reactant Concentration concentration of thiosulfate throughout the runs
on Reaction Rate is constant.
[S2O82-] [I-] [S2O32-] Time Rate
Run
(M) (M) (M) (s) (M/s)
1 0.02 0.08 8x10-4 92 4.35x10-6
2 0.02 0.04 8x10-4 181 2.21x10-6
3 0.02 0.02 8x10-4 340 1.18x10-6
4 0.03 0.04 8x10-4 132 3.03x10-6
5 0.04 0.04 8x10-4 81 4.94x10-6
where M is the molarity and V is the volume of The graph above has a slope equal to 1.135
the solution. Rate of reaction was calculated which is approximately equal to one therefore;
using the following relationship. (Calculations the reaction order with respect to S2O32- is 1.
are provided in the Appendix)
[ ] [ ]
(6)
Rate = k[A]m[B]n (7) From the two figures above, we can conclude
that the overall reaction order of Equation 1 is
where k is the rate constant, [A] and [B] is the at second order. This implies that when you
concentration of reacting species, and m and n doubled the concentration of either persulfate
is the order of the reaction with respect to A and or iodide, the reaction rate will be also doubled.
B respectively. From the equation, it can be
concluded that the rate of reaction is directly The rate constant for each run can be computed
proportional to the concentration of the using Equation 7. (See Appendix for
solutions. computations) The rate constant for each run is
slightly different from each other. Their average
J. A. Ines/Chemistry 26.1 (2018) P a g e |4
will give the most probable value of the rate Arrhenius constant is 2.76X106. This was
constant. The rate constant for Equation 1 is obtained from the linearized Arrhenius
2.81x10-3 M-1s-1. Equation
Appendix
A. Reactant Concentrations
Run 1
[S2O82-] : (0.1 M)(5.0 mL) = (X)(25.0 mL) X= 0.02 M
[I-] : (0.2 M)(10.0 mL) = (X)(25.0 mL) X= 0.08 M
[S2O32-] : (0.004 M)(10.0 mL) = (X)(25.0 mL) X= 0.0008 M
Run 2
[S2O82-] : (0.1 M)(5.0 mL) = (X)(25.0 mL) X= 0.02 M
[I-] : (0.2 M)(5.0 mL) = (X)(25.0 mL) X= 0.04 M
[S2O32-] : (0.004 M)(10.0 mL) = (X)(25.0 mL) X= 0.0008 M
Run 3
[S2O82-] : (0.1 M)(5.0 mL) = (X)(25.0 mL) X= 0.02 M
[I-] : (0.2 M)(2.5 mL) = (X)(25.0 mL) X= 0.02 M
[S2O32-] : (0.004 M)(10.0 mL) = (X)(25.0 mL) X= 0.0008 M
Run 4
[S2O82-] : (0.1 M)(7.5 mL) = (X)(25.0 mL) X= 0.03 M
[I-] : (0.2 M)(5.0 mL) = (X)(25.0 mL) X= 0.04 M
[S2O32-] : (0.004 M)(10.0 mL) = (X)(25.0 mL) X= 0.0008 M
Run 5
[S2O82-] : (0.1 M)(10.0 mL) = (X)(25.0 mL) X= 0.04 M
[I-] : (0.2 M)(5.0 mL) = (X)(25.0 mL) X= 0.04 M
[S2O32-] : (0.004 M)(10.0 mL) = (X)(25.0 mL) X= 0.0008 M
[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Rate Law:
[ ] [ ]
Run 1: Run 2 Set 1:
[ ]
Run 2 Set 2:
[ ][ ]
Run 1:
J. A. Ines/Chemistry 26.1 (2018) P a g e |6
Run 2: Set 1
y = b + mx
a. Activation energy:
Slope = -9186.3 =-
b. Arrhenius constant: