Experiment 5 Chem 26.1
Experiment 5 Chem 26.1
Experiment 5 Chem 26.1
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS
1. Write the net ionic reaction for the precipitation of Ca(OH)
2 and give the K
sp
expression of the reaction.
The net ionic reaction for the precipitation of Ca(OH)
be expressed as,
2 can
2+
Ca(OH)
(s) Ca
+ 2OH
2
[1]
2+
2. What is the working equation for the determination of the [Ca
] in the saturated
solution of Ca(OH)
?
2
The working equation for the determination of the [Ca2+
2
2+ [OH]
[Ca
]= 2
or
2+
[Ca
]=
(V titrant)[H+]
(V ianalyte)
-
2+
3. Write the K
of Ca(OH)
in terms of its (a) molar solubility
s,
(b) [OH
] and (c) [Ca
].
sp
2
The Ksp
of
Ca(OH)
written in terms of its molar solubility is
2
K sp = 4s3
2-
in terms of
[OH
],
3
]
4([OH
2 )
]
3
4[Ca2+]
[2]
4. Discuss the effects of common ions and increasing ionic strength on the solubility of
the Ca(OH)
precipitate. Do they coincide with theoretical effects? Explain.
2
The presence of another common ion in the solution can reduce the solubility of the
precipitate, shifting the equilibrium of it back to the reactant side [3]. In general, the solubility of
a slightly soluble salt is decreased by the presence of a second solute the furnishes a common ion
[4]. However, in the data gathered it can be seen that the opposite was observed.
On the other hand, the data obtained did not have a definite trend with respect to the
effect of ionic strength. The data at first decreased, from to 0.010 M to 0.050 M, then from this
point it gradually increased starting from 0.050 M to 0.50 M. This data however, do not coincide
with the diverse-ion theory, which deals with inter-ionic contacts of the ions present in a
solution. It states that
the interactions between ions become stronger as the ionic concentration
of the solution rises. The increase in attractions leads to lesser activities of the participating ions
or their effective concentration thus causing an increase in solubility [5].
5. What are the possible sources of errors and their effect on the calculated
parameters? Rationalize.
Possible sources of errors are improper measurement of the reagents. If the
concentrations of the reagents are not accurate, then it will change the results obtained since it
depends upon the concentration of the substance. Another source of error may have been from
the preparation of the sodium carbonate suspension. The suspension may not have been
saturated enough before an analyte was measured out of it. This will result to lesser K
sp than the
theoretical. Last possible cause would have been from the titration process. Improper way of
titrating, wrong measurement of the used volume of titrant etc., will all lead to a gross error on