Master these strategies to write clean, reusable code across all data roles. Here is how you keep your code clean, efficient, and adaptable:  1. ð ð¼ð±ðð¹ð®ð¿ ðð²ðð¶ð´ð»: Break down your code into distinct functions that handle individual tasks. This modular approach allows you to reuse functions across different projects and makes debugging far easier.      2. ðð¼ð°ððºð²ð»ðð®ðð¶ð¼ð»: Comment your code clearly and provide README files for larger projects. Explain what your functions do, the inputs they accept, and the expected outputs. This makes onboarding new team members smoother and helps your future self understand the logic quickly.      3. ð£ð®ð¿ð®ðºð²ðð²ð¿ð¶ðð®ðð¶ð¼ð»: Use parameters for values that could change over time, such as file paths, column names, or thresholds. This flexibility ensures that your code is adaptable without requiring major rewrites.      4. ðð»ðð²ð»ðð¶ð¼ð»ð®ð¹ ð¡ð®ðºð¶ð»ð´: Variable, function, and class names are your first layer of documentation. Make them descriptive and consistent.      5. ðð¼ð»ðð¶ððð²ð»ð ð¦ððð¹ð²: Adopt a coding standard and stick to it. Whether itâs the way you format loops or how you organize modules, consistency makes your code predictable and easier to follow.      6. ðð¿ð¿ð¼ð¿ ðð®ð»ð±ð¹ð¶ð»ð´: Include error handling in your functions. Use try-except blocks to catch exceptions, and provide informative messages that indicate what went wrong and how to fix it.      7. ð§ð²ððð¶ð»ð´: Implement unit tests to verify that each function performs as expected. This proactive approach helps identify issues early and ensures that changes donât introduce new bugs.      8. ð©ð²ð¿ðð¶ð¼ð» ðð¼ð»ðð¿ð¼ð¹: Use Git or another version control system to manage changes to your code. It allows you to track progress, roll back mistakes, and collaborate seamlessly.      9. ðð¼ð±ð² ð¥ð²ðð¶ð²ðð: Encourage peer reviews to catch potential issues, share best practices, and foster a culture of collaborative learning.     10. ð¥ð²ðð¶ð²ð ð®ð»ð± ð¥ð²ð³ð®ð°ðð¼ð¿: Review your code after a break, seeking opportunities to simplify and improve. Refactoring is your path to more robust and efficient code.  Whether writing small SQL queries or building large Python models, a clean coding style will make you a more efficient analyst. Itâs an investment that will pay off in productivity and reliability. Whatâs your top tip for writing reusable code? ---------------- â»ï¸ Share if you find this post useful â Follow for more daily insights on how to grow your career in the data field #dataanalytics #datascience #python #cleancode #productivity
Measuring Consulting Project Success
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
-
-
We recently analysed 1,064,667 proposals to see what works and what doesnât. Here are 5 stats that stood out to me⦠1. Proposals that were viewed for more than 4 minutes had a 41% acceptance rate â compared to just 3.5% for those skimmed in under a minute. This shows the importance of sending proposals that hold your prospectâs attention (as well as how useful analytics are for knowing who is real vs not). 2. When at least two additional people view a proposal within the first five days, the acceptance rate nearly doubles. Proposals that get shared, get signed! 3. Proposals with interactive elements had acceptance rates up to 2x higher. A little interactivity can go a long way in helping proposals stand out and convert! 4. Proposals with 6 or fewer content blocks (i.e. sections or pages) had a 66% higher acceptance rate than longer ones. Keeping content concise can really pay off (yes - you can insert many caveats here - but it's still interesting and the trend in the data was clear). 5. When a buyer interacts with your quote, acceptance rates increase 1.72 times. Sending your buyer a quote that allows them to âchoose their own adventureâ â adjusting quantities, toggling optional add-ons, etc. is a powerful conversion level. Want to create incredible proposals and get insightful analytics? Head on over to getqwilr.com
-
Iâve now ran over 100 pilots (trials) at Gong. With a win rate of over 90%. 4 biggest lessons. 1. ðð±ððð®ðð¢ð¯ð ðð¥ð¢ð ð§ð¦ðð§ð Never begin a pilot without executive alignment. Ideally, the economic buyer has already been engaged through demos / the evaluation. If not, this is a great opportunity to get them looped in as a âgive / getâ before starting. âBefore approving a pilot, we require exec alignment. Iâve learned itâs much easier to ask for 20 minutes upfront and all be aligned, than 50K at the end. How can we loop ___ in?â 2. ðð®ðððð¬ð¬ ðð«ð¢ððð«ð¢ð Before beginning a pilot, align on success criteria with the team + economic buyer. Always come ready with criteria proposed to help guide them as to what they should be looking to prove. Keep them simple. Under promise, over deliver. I also use the time to uncover additional risk. âSay we nail all the success criteria, you love the pilot, but the team decides not to sign on (date). What are the most likely 2 reasons why?â 3. ðð®ðð®ðð¥ ðð®ðððð¬ð¬ ðð¥ðð§ð¬ Create a mutual success plan that outlines the success crtieria, sessions, pilot resources, etc. and share it with your POC to encourage editing. I have 3 lines that include - security, legal, and signer. 4. ððð¡ððð®ð¥ð ðð¥ð¥ ð¬ðð¬ð¬ð¢ð¨ð§ð¬ ð®ð©ðð«ð¨ð§ð If your pilot / trial process includes trainings, insights, check-ins, get them scheduled in bulk. Never have to worry about grabbing a next meeting then. Key to all 4... having a great, repeatable template to guide the buyer. Snag my (free) mutual success plan: https://lnkd.in/gGDQKgfC ð¦ð¦ð¦
-
I've reviewed hundreds of freelancer proposals and discovered why most get ignored... And it's not what most "experts" claim. It's not your experience. It's not your portfolio. It's not even your rates. The brutal truth? Your proposals sound exactly like everyone else's because you don't understand copywriting principles. Let me show you what I mean: PROPOSAL #1 (What Everyone Sends): "I'm a skilled web developer with 5 years of experience. I've worked with many clients and can deliver your project on time and within budget. I'm proficient in HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and WordPress. Please check my portfolio to see my previous work." PROPOSAL #2 (What Gets Responses): "I noticed your current site takes 7.2 seconds to load on mobile â which means you're losing about 32% of visitors before they even see your products. I've helped 3 other e-commerce stores cut their load times by 65%, resulting in conversion increases of 27-41%. Would you be open to me sharing a quick plan for how we could do the same for you?" See the difference? â One is about the freelancer. The other is about the CLIENT'S PROBLEM. â One lists generic qualifications. The other demonstrates specific understanding. â One blends in with 50 other proposals. The other stands out immediately. This is copywriting in action â the art of using words to drive action. The unfortunate reality is that most Pakistani freelancers are learning technical skills but completely overlooking the ONE skill that gets clients to actually hire you â persuasive communication. Â Here's how to apply copywriting principles to your proposals: ð Lead with their problem or a solution, not your skills ð Use specific numbers, not vague claims ð Create a mini "before and after" story ð Always add a unique 'hook' to your proposals ð Never forget to add an easy call to action Learning copywriting principles could be the difference between sending proposals that get ignored and ones that have clients fighting to work with you.
-
ð· Key Input Parameters for Mine Design & Evaluation âï¸ Designing and evaluating a mine requires a detailed understanding of various factors that influence both short-term operational success and long-term sustainability. From geological data to environmental considerations, each parameter plays a critical role in optimizing mining efficiency, reducing risks, and ensuring responsible resource development. ð¹ Resource Model & Geological Constraints â Ore grades, mineralization styles, impurities, densities, geological continuity, structural controls ð¹ Geotechnical & Hydrogeological Data â Slope stability, ground conditions, rock mechanics, groundwater inflows, fault zones, seismic risks ð¹ Mining Method Selection â Open-pit vs. underground, cutoff grade optimization, mine sequencing, dilution control, ore recovery strategies ð¹ Processing & Metallurgical Factors â Ore variability, mineral liberation, metallurgical recoveries, process efficiency, product quality ð¹ Scale of Operation â Mine life, production rates, processing capacity, fleet size, automation potential ð¹ Operational & Sustaining Costs â Mining, processing, energy, labor, maintenance, administration, ESG-related costs ð¹ Water & Power Supply â Availability, quality, sustainability, alternative energy sources, desalination needs ð¹ Environmental & Waste Management â ARD control, tailings storage, mine closure planning, ESG compliance, carbon footprint reduction ð¹ Permitting & Regulatory Compliance â Legal frameworks, social license to operate, community engagement, taxation, geopolitical risks ð¹ Market & Pricing Dynamics â Commodity price trends, demand-supply analysis, contract structures, export regulations ð¹ Infrastructure & Logistics â Roads, rail, ports, transportation costs, storage, off-site processing, supply chain resilience ð¹ Capital Investment & Financial Viability â Initial & sustaining capital, infrastructure development, financing strategies, ROI assessment ð¹ Dilution & Ore Loss Management â Grade control, selective mining, reconciliation, blasting efficiency, stockpile management ð¹ Risk Assessment & Contingency Planning â Political, environmental, financial, technological, and operational risks A well-optimized mine design integrates geology, engineering, economics, and sustainability, driving long-term success ð #MineDesign #MiningEngineering #Geology #SustainableMining #ResourceOptimization #MinePlanning #MiningInnovation
-
⨠Top Recommendations for Readable Code in Embedded Systems ⨠In embedded systems, code readability isn't just a luxuryâit's a necessity. Clear, consistent code can mean the difference between smooth project progress and hours of debugging. Here are my top recommendations for crafting readable code in embedded systems: 1) Consistent Naming Conventions Choose descriptive names for variables, functions, and constants. Stick to a clear convention (e.g., snake_case for variables, CamelCase for functions) so that anyone reading the code can immediately understand its purpose. 2) Limit Function Size You can limit your functions Cyclomatic Complexity, but that doesn't mean your code will be readable. Use these rules of thumb for functions: - Don't allow code to go longer than a screen (formerly page) - Don't let a single line exceed 120 characters (I hate horizontal scrolling) 3) Comment with Intent Comments should explain why a piece of code exists, not what it does. Focus on explaining the reasoning behind non-obvious decisions, hardware constraints, or workarounds. 4) Use Constants, Not Magic Numbers Replace magic numbers with named constants. This practice not only improves readability but also makes future updates easier and reduces errors. 5) Avoid Deep Nesting Deeply nested loops and conditions can be hard to follow. Instead, use techniques like look-up tables, use do while loops for early returns, or refactor to flatten the structure and improve clarity. 6) Follow Industry-Recognized Guidelines There are a lot of great coding style guides out there. Adopt or adapt existing style guides (like MISRA for C/C++) to ensure your code adheres to best practices while remaining readable. 7) Automate Coding Style Checks Before you commit your code and put it up for review, run a tool that can autoformat your code to adhere to your coding standard. While this won't fix poor comments, magic numbers, etc, it can at least make sure that your code matches the style so these things can be spotted in review. Readable code is maintainable codeâespecially crucial in the long lifecycle of embedded systems. What coding style guidelines do you follow to keep your embedded code clean and readable? Share your tips or ask questions in the comments!
-
Tonnage and grade get a project discovered. Geometallurgy, Geotech, and Hydrogeology get it built or break it. From my experience in exploration and production, the most expensive mistake in mining is waiting until the Feasibility Study to seriously think of these "non-grade" factors. A 3D grade-only model is an incomplete map. To truly de-risk a project and protect its NPV, we must integrate the "how" with the "what" from day one. Geometallurgy: Your model must include recovery, hardness , and processing domains. A high-grade, refractory ore block is a liability, not an asset, if your plant can't handle it. Geotechnical: Your model must include RQD and structural domains. A weak hanging wall will destroy your economics with dilution long before a pit slope failure suspends your operations. Hydrogeology: Your model must include high-permeability zones. Unbudgeted dewatering (OPEX) or a catastrophic water inrush can sink a project faster than low grades. The goal isn't separate reports. The goal is a single, unified 3D block model a "Single Source of Truth" that informs mine planning, metallurgy, and engineering simultaneously. That is how you build a resilient, profitable mine. #Mining #MineralExploration #Geology #Geometallurgy #Geotechnical #Mining_Project_Risk_Management
-
I'm incredibly opinionated on how to run enterprise software pilots. One of the interesting charts in the MIT AI report confirms something I've been seeing in the field as well: 75% of pilots go nowhere. That's not just a technology problem, it's a process problem. The gap between "piloted" and "successfully implemented" often comes down to how we frame the pilot from day one. The best pilots I've seen treat it as a systematic de-risking exercise for both vendor >and< customer, not as a customised demo. They're designed to answer the hard questions: - Does the tech work? - Does it work for our specific use case? - Can it integrate with our existing systems/ workflows? - Does it impact KPI X? (and do we know the KPI we're trying to solve for?) Most critically: do we have the organizational commitment (=exec buy-in) to see this through? Without proper executive alignment from the outset, we're essentially running expensive experiments that were never meant to scale. The person approving a pilot is rarely the same person who signs off on the full implementation. The most successful implementations I've seen started with clear executive buy-in and treated the pilot as validation of a predetermined path to production, not as a fishing expedition to see what might be possible. Curious to hear your thoughts: ð Marc Steven Ramos ð Dave Kellogg Kyle Forrest Thomas Otter Jason Averbook Martha Curioni
-
âMining Investment: What Serious Investors Really Look Forâ It takes more than a resource to attract real capital. Owning a deposit is just the beginning. But turning that deposit into a globally investable asset that requires trust, structure, evidence, and a forward-looking strategy. Institutional and strategic investors evaluate mining projects through five essential lenses before committing capital: 1. Resource Verification & Technical Integrity ⢠Is the deposit backed by JORC or NI 43-101 standards? ⢠Are the drill results, lab data, grade, flake size, and recovery rates documented? ⢠Has the resource been validated by independent parties? âCapital doesnât follow assumptions. It follows evidence.â 2. Geopolitical and Legal Stability ⢠Is the host country open to foreign investment? ⢠Are mining licenses secure and legal frameworks transparent? ⢠Are there risks of ownership disputes or policy reversals? âNo serious investor risks millions on political uncertainty.â 3. Infrastructure and Operational Access ⢠How close is the project to rail, grid power, water, or ports? ⢠Are there year-round roads and logistics corridors? ⢠Whatâs the cost of bringing the resource to market? âEven world-class deposits can remain untouched without access.â 4. Market Fit & Strategic Demand ⢠Is the commodity aligned with long-term trends (e.g. batteries, EVs, defense tech)? ⢠Are offtake partners, end buyers, or national strategic interests involved? ⢠Is demand expected to grow over the next 10â20 years? âThe best investments follow the future not just the market today.â 5. Management, Transparency, and Exit Strategy ⢠Does the team have proven mining and investment experience? ⢠Is the corporate governance clean and investor-friendly? ⢠How does the investor realize returns â IPO, acquisition, or revenue sharing? âCapital flows to people more than rocks.â And hereâs the truth most overlook: If your project lacks: ⢠Complete documentation, ⢠Legal clarity, or ⢠Internationally recognized validation It doesnât matter how large your deposit is you wonât be able to price it at global market value. A resource is potential. But documentation is valuation. If you structure your project properly, demonstrate compliance, mitigate risks, and align with infrastructure and demand you no longer have to ask for investment. You become qualified for it. In mining, raising capital isnât just about whatâs in the ground. Itâs about how clearly you show the world what itâs worth. #MiningInvestment #Geopolitics #StrategicMinerals #ResourceValuation #InfrastructureMatters #CriticalRawMaterials #GlobalCapital #TransparentOwnership #ExplorationToExecution
-
I analyzed 1000+ rejected proposals on Upwork to understand what actually kills deals. Here's the painful truth about why great freelancers lose projects. It's not about price. It's not about experience. It's about red flags clients can't ignore. I've been on both sides - hiring and being hired. Here are the instant deal-breakers that make clients hit "reject": 1. The "Trust Me" Trap: Bad: "I'm the best at what I do" Reality: Claims without proof trigger skepticism Fix: "Here's a similar project I completed last month (with metrics)" 2. The Copy-Paste Crime: Bad: Generic proposals that could fit any job Reality: Clients can spot templates instantly Fix: Reference specific details from their job post 3. The Expertise Overload: Bad: Listing every skill you've ever learned Reality: Makes you look unfocused Fix: Match exactly what they asked for, nothing more 4. The Desperation Signal: Bad: "I'll start right now!" or "I'll work for less!" Reality: Sounds too eager, raises suspicion Fix: Show professional availability, stick to your rates 5. The Vague Promise: Bad: "I'll deliver amazing results" Reality: No concrete deliverables = no trust Fix: "You'll get X deliverables by Y date with Z revisions" Here's what most don't realize: Clients aren't rejecting you. They're rejecting uncertainty. Every vague statement Every missing detail Every generic response = Another reason to say no The harsh reality? Your proposal isn't just competing against other freelancers. It's competing against the client's fear of making a bad decision. Want to win more projects? Don't focus on being the best choice. Focus on being the clearest choice. Because clarity beats capability every single time.