Defeat for XL Bully owners as judge rules 'alarmingly high' number of deaths caused by the dogs was enough to justify ban
- Campaigners had brought a High Court challenge against the new crackdown
A ban on XL bully dogs has been ruled lawful by the High Court despite campaigning owners' claims that it was based on 'unreliable material'.
Judges have said that ministers had 'sufficient evidence of an alarmingly high level of fatal attacks' by the dog breed when launching the crackdown last year.
XL bully owner Sophie Coulthard and campaign group Don't Ban Me, Licence Me pursued legal action against the Department for Environment and Rural Affairs over the large bulldog-type American breed being added to a banned list under the Dangerous Dogs Act.
Since February, it has been a criminal offence to own an XL bully dog in England and Wales without an exemption certificate - meaning unregistered pets will be taken and owners possibly fined and prosecuted.
Opponents argued that the ban was unlawful, insisting it was based on 'unreliable' material and also lacked a 'proper' analysis over its impact while including 'vague' standards that risked people unknowingly committing a criminal offence.
But in a new judgment at London's High Court, Mrs Justice Lang has now dismissed most of the legal challenge over the ban.
The judge found that issues such as defining the right types of dog and the human impacts of euthanasia had been considered by Defra.
She ruled it was 'not necessary' to interrogate 'each reported case of a dog attack or fatality' ahead of the ban nor to delay the crackdown coming into force 'until an official definition of the XL Bully was prepared'.
XL bully owner Sophie Coulthard (pictured with her pet Billy) and campaign group Don't Ban Me, Licence Me pursued legal action against the Department for Environment and Rural Affairs
The former Conservative government introduced new restrictions on ownership of XL bully dogs following attacks including this one captured on CCTV in Birmingham in September 2023
Since February, it has been a criminal offence to own an XL bully dog in England and Wales without an exemption certificate
The judge said she had been shown data for 11 deaths between January 2020 and September last year.
Mrs Justice Lang added: 'Suffice it to say that, even excluding those cases where there was legitimate doubt as to whether an XL Bully was involved, there was sufficient evidence of an alarmingly high level of fatal attacks by XL bullies or XL bullies crossbreeds to justify the defendant's concerns.'
She did rule in favour of the campaigners on one point, however - finding that the Government had failed to comply with public sector equality rules with assessments in September and October last year.
However, the judge said that she would not order any changes, following a 'comprehensive' and lawful quality assessment last May.
She said: 'It is highly likely that the outcome for the claimants would not have been substantially different if the conduct complained of had not occurred.'
The new laws brought in earlier this year ordered that XL bully dogs which were more than one year old after this date must be neutered by June 30, while younger dogs must receive the same treatment by December 31.
The powerful breed has distinctive features, including an average 20in height, broad shoulders, a bulky head and 9st weight.
Yet fans of the dogs have been sticking up for them in the face of a government backlash - with plenty of videos shared on social media site TikTok celebrating such pets.
Some show XL bullies appearing quiet and docile, including one playing with a young girl - while others joke about barking dogs appearing 'so angry'.
In the case brought by campaigners to the High Court, their lawyer Cathryn McGahey argued the ban came from a 'hasty' announcement by then-Prime Minister Rishi Sunak in September last year, the day after a fatal dog attack, which led to legal errors.
In written arguments, the barrister said Defra had 'no material on which to base a rational decision that dogs involved in recent attacks were disproportionately of XL bully type'.
She said the Government estimated there were 10,000 XL bullies in the UK, but 57,301 have been registered.
Ms McGahey said there was no analysis of the numbers of other dog types involved in fatal attacks, adding: 'If five XL bullies have been involved in fatal attacks out of a population of 50,000, and one German shepherd dog out of a population of 10,000, then XL bullies are no more dangerous than German shepherds.'
Ned Westaway, for Defra, said it had been 'rational' to conclude that XL bullies had the characteristics of fighting dogs due to their connection to pitbull terriers.
He said the Government's XL bully standard had been 'carefully and sensibly thought about' and was not unlawful.
In his written arguments, Mr Westaway said ministers were aware the number of XL bullies could be higher than 10,000.
Solicitor Rebecca Strong, Sophie Coulthard and Rose Downey, head of research at campaign group Don't Ban Me License Me, outside the Royal Courts of Justice in London in April this year
Sophie Coulthard, pictured with her pet XL bully dog Billy, has campaigned against the new restrictions on the animals which were introduced by Rishi Sunak's government
He added: 'Even if the number is substantially greater than 0.1 per cent of the UK dog population, XL bully type dogs would still have been responsible for a disproportionate, and concerning, number of dog attacks since 2020'.
XL bully fan Ms Coulthard set up a campaign group called Bully Watch and in a social media video which went viral last year, she urged fellow owners to 'get out there' and show their dog is safe as 'now is not the time to hide'.
She told of deciding to get an XL Bully dog after seeking a dog that was both capable of going on hikes and could live in her London apartment.
And she did not recognise the characterisation of XL Bullies as naturally violent animals, adding that her pet named Billy was the ideal 'family companion'.
She has criticised what she called a 'moral panic' over the dogs, following high-profile attacks on youngsters including a Birmingham schoolgirl in September 2023.
Ms Coulthard previously said: 'Certain, let's say, retired dog experts have been using this language - "devil dogs", "franken-bully" and "tiger on a lead" - all that is doing is scaring the general public into putting pressure into a knee-jerk reaction.
'You are going to have responsible owners like me who are unfairly targeted for the type of dog that I have, while dog attacks across all breeds are up at the moment.'
'If we've learned anything from the Dangerous Dog Act, it's that banning by type doesn't work.
New data has revealed top ten XL Bully hotspots, unveiling the areas with the highest numbers of the 'dangerous' dog
'The people who are breeding irresponsibly and owning irresponsibly will just move on to another breed.'
New data last month revealed that at least 16 dogs are seized every day in the UK, with experts warning that dangerous dog bans on breeds may not be the way to solve the maulings epidemic.
Since November 2023, just under 6,000 dangerous dogs have been seized by 27 forces, a Freedom of Information (FOI) request found - meaning 114 dogs are taken every week.
Of the forces which responded to the FOI, Greater Manchester had the highest figures, with 19 dogs captured per week.
A spokesperson at Puppies.co.uk, which obtained the data, said: 'The Dangerous Dogs Act has been in effect for over three decades and yet, hospital admissions due to dog bites continue to rise.'
They added that instead of focusing on breed, the emphasis should be on 'addressing the root causes of dog aggression' instead, and called for stricter laws and enforcement on poor breeding practices instead.
A dog attack is counted as a crime when an 'owner or person in charge allowing a dog to be dangerously out of control in any place in England or Wales injuring any person or assistance dog'.
Under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, police may seize any dog in any place, (public or private) in England or Wales if the dog appears to the officer to be dangerously out of control.
Angeline Mahal, 50, was killed at her home in Hornchurch, east London, by two of her own XL bully dogs in May this year - one of at least six reported fatalities since the new ban came in
With the permission of a court, the police can seize a banned dog, even if a complaint hasn't been made and the dog has not acted dangerously.
At least six people are reported to have been killed in attacks by XL bully dogs since the new rules came into force earlier this year.
Among the victims was a woman in her 50s, Angeline Mahal, who was set upon by her two registered XL bully dogs at a property in Cornwall Close, Hornchurch, in the east London borough of Havering in May.
The previous Conservative government, led by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, brought in the new legislation after XL bullies were blamed for maulings which led to at least 11 deaths since 2021. Those killed ranged from 17 months to 84 years of age.