-
The Harm Principle: How to live your life the way you want to
John Stuart Mill argues the case for being able to live your life the way you want to. Narrated by Harry Shearer. Scripted by Nigel Warburton.
From the BBC Radio 4 series - A History of Ideas. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04bwydw
This project is made in partnership with The Open University and the animations were created by Cognitive
published: 07 Nov 2014
-
John Stuart Mill's big idea: Harsh critics make good thinkers | Keith Whittington | Big Think
John Stuart Mill's big idea: Harsh critics make good thinkers
New videos DAILY: https://bigth.ink
Join Big Think Edge for exclusive video lessons from top thinkers and doers: https://bigth.ink/Edge
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
19th-century political philosopher John Stuart Mill defended the right of free societies to explore radical and dangerous ideas.
One of his arguments was based on humility: You must be prepared to be wrong, and genuinely be open to being persuaded. Put your ideas into intellectual battle by exposing them to the harshest critics. These critics will show up your flaws and make you a more sophisticated thinker.
Another of Mill's arguments was concerned with arrogance. He criticized the common tendency to want to sh...
published: 08 May 2019
-
John Stuart Mill: An Introduction (On Liberty, Utilitarianism, The Subjection of Women)
http://www.tomrichey.net
John Stuart Mill, a 19th century English philosopher, wrote three books at are still widely-read today: On Liberty, Utilitarianism, and The Subjection of Women. This is a brief introduction to Mill and his work for students taking survey-level courses in philosophy and AP European History.
published: 17 Apr 2014
-
John Stuart Mill - On Liberty
On Liberty by John Stuart Mill - http://amzn.to/1P09fNn (affiliate link)
===================================================
In this lecture we look at John Stuart Mill's influential work "On Liberty" in which he argues for the importance of individual liberties, especially freedom of opinion and expression.
===================================================
Support us on Patreon: http://patreon.com/academyofideas
Get the transcript: http://academyofideas.com/2013/08/john-stuart-mill-on-liberty/
===================================================
published: 20 Aug 2013
-
Utilitarianism: Crash Course Philosophy #36
Our next stop in our tour of the ethical lay of the land is utilitarianism. With a little help from Batman, Hank explains the principle of utility, and the difference between act and rule utilitarianism.
--
Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios
--
Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashC...
Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse
Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com
Support CrashCourse on Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/crashcourse
CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
published: 21 Nov 2016
-
JOHN STUART MILL (1) – ASSOCIACIONISMO E QUÍMICA MENTAL | EMPIRISMO BRITÂNICO
John Stuart Mill foi filósofo e economista. Filho de James Mill (que já estudamos anteriormente), John Stuart nasceu em Londres no ano de 1806 e faleceu na França em 1873. Embora seu pai tenha sido um grande filósofo, John conseguiu superá-lo e é conhecido como o filósofo britânico mais influente do século XIX.
--------------------------
Obras sugeridas:
“An Introduction to the History of Psychology”, 7 ed., de B. Hergenhahn e Tracy Henley.
“A Conceptual History of Psychology”, de John D. Greenwood.
published: 22 Apr 2019
-
JOHN STUART MILL (2) – UMA CIÊNCIA DA NATUREZA HUMANA – EMPIRISMO BRITÂNICO
John Locke, David Hume e David Hartley foram alguns dos filósofos que se esforçaram no sentido de criar uma ciência da mente tendo como base o paradigma das ciências naturais, mas foi John Stuart Mill (o mais respeitado filósofo da ciência de seu tempo) quem mais contribuiu para o desenvolvimento da Psicologia como uma ciência.
Mill recusava a ideia comum de que pensamentos, sentimentos e ações não estariam sujeitos à análise científica. Segundo ele, qualquer sistema que seja regulado por leis está sujeito ao estudo científico, mesmo quando essas leis ainda não são compreendidas.
Nesse vídeo, veremos como Mill entende a Ciência da Natureza Humana.
--------------------------
Obras sugeridas:
“An Introduction to the History of Psychology”, 7 ed., de B. Hergenhahn e Tracy Henley.
“A Concep...
published: 25 Apr 2019
-
John Stuart Mill, Sulla libertà - Corrado Augias
Una iniziativa congiunta di editori, scrittori e librai
La legge attualmente in discussione al Senato relativa alla pubblicabilità degli atti giudiziari approvata in Commissione Giustizia configura una grave limitazione della libertà di informazione dei cittadini.
Una libertà essenziale, tutelata non solo dalla nostra Costituzione ma anche dalla Corte europea dei diritti dell'uomo. Una libertà che si coniuga strettamente alla libertà di stampa che è la precondizione del lavoro di chi scrive, pubblica e diffonde i libri. Ci sembra importante dare un contributo alla riflessione e all'approfondimento di un tema centrale di ogni Stato di diritto, di ogni democrazia liberale. Riflessioni e approfondimenti che in gran parte sono contenuti nei libri: classici e contemporanei, di narrativa e...
published: 04 Jun 2010
-
Law and Justice - Utilitarianism - 21.4 John Stuart Mill
“Law and Justice" is a free online course on Janux that is open to anyone. Learn more at http://janux.ou.edu.
Created by the University of Oklahoma, Janux is an interactive learning community that gives learners direct connections to courses, education resources, faculty, and each other. Janux courses are freely available or may be taken for college credit by enrolled OU students.
Dr. Kyle Harper is Associate Professor of Classics and Letters,
Video by NextThought (http://nextthought.com).
Copyright © 2000-2014 The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, All Rights Reserved.
published: 29 Jul 2014
2:01
The Harm Principle: How to live your life the way you want to
John Stuart Mill argues the case for being able to live your life the way you want to. Narrated by Harry Shearer. Scripted by Nigel Warburton.
From the BBC Ra...
John Stuart Mill argues the case for being able to live your life the way you want to. Narrated by Harry Shearer. Scripted by Nigel Warburton.
From the BBC Radio 4 series - A History of Ideas. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04bwydw
This project is made in partnership with The Open University and the animations were created by Cognitive
https://wn.com/The_Harm_Principle_How_To_Live_Your_Life_The_Way_You_Want_To
John Stuart Mill argues the case for being able to live your life the way you want to. Narrated by Harry Shearer. Scripted by Nigel Warburton.
From the BBC Radio 4 series - A History of Ideas. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04bwydw
This project is made in partnership with The Open University and the animations were created by Cognitive
- published: 07 Nov 2014
- views: 337257
5:46
John Stuart Mill's big idea: Harsh critics make good thinkers | Keith Whittington | Big Think
John Stuart Mill's big idea: Harsh critics make good thinkers
New videos DAILY: https://bigth.ink
Join Big Think Edge for exclusive video lessons from top think...
John Stuart Mill's big idea: Harsh critics make good thinkers
New videos DAILY: https://bigth.ink
Join Big Think Edge for exclusive video lessons from top thinkers and doers: https://bigth.ink/Edge
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
19th-century political philosopher John Stuart Mill defended the right of free societies to explore radical and dangerous ideas.
One of his arguments was based on humility: You must be prepared to be wrong, and genuinely be open to being persuaded. Put your ideas into intellectual battle by exposing them to the harshest critics. These critics will show up your flaws and make you a more sophisticated thinker.
Another of Mill's arguments was concerned with arrogance. He criticized the common tendency to want to shield other people from dangerous ideas as paternalistic. You can judge good ideas from bad ideas; you should afford everyone the same respect.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KEITH WHITTINGTON
Keith E. Whittington is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics at Princeton University. He is the author, most recently, of "Speak Freely: Why Universities Must Defend Free Speech", as well as "Repugnant Laws: Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present".
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRANSCRIPT:
KEITH WHITTINGTON: John Stuart Mill was an extraordinary and influential thinker in the early 19th century in England. He was something of a radical within his society at the time and, as a consequence, was very interested in the ability to develop and communicate radical ideas that were outside the mainstream, because he was interested in a lot of those ideas himself, and he was much more interested in how a free society should operate the ability of people to think for themselves in a free society, and sometimes run against the grain of public opinion and mainstream thought in general.
He offered a variety of arguments about why it is we ought to value that kind of speech, those kinds of spaces, that kind of robust debate. So one of those arguments I characterize as an argument driven by humility. That is, that part of what Mill wanted to remind us is that we all might be mistaken, that our own understanding is limited. Our own set of ideas are very limited. And that we can learn from each other. And we can learn from others who have different ideas than ourselves. But that requires some willingness to accept the possibility that we, in fact, might be mistaken. And of course, we walk around most of the time with the belief that we are upholding a set of correct ideas, that we think we know our own minds. We think the ideas we hold are true. That's why we hold them in the first place. And so it can be challenging to go into a conversation and go into a discussion, go into a public space and accept the possibility that we might be wrong. But Mill wanted to emphasize that it's only by accepting that possibility that we're wrong that we can have the opportunity to learn. And it's important for our own sake that we be able to continue to learn and grow by talking to people with different ideas and being genuinely open to the possibility that they might persuade us. They might show the flaws in our ideas. They might expose our mistakes. And as a consequence, they might help us make progress.
But he also constructs an argument that's really grounded instead on a concern with arrogance of others. Here, the concern is not so much that we be willing to hear from people that we disagree with because we accept the possibility that we might be wrong. But instead, he wants to speak to our instincts to want to suppress opinions that we find disagreeable or dangerous so that no one else can hear them, instead. And this is fundamentally a paternalistic concern, a concern that we're worried about other people, that they might be misled by bad ideas. And so even if we think that we ourselves are capable of separating good ideas from bad ideas, and so as consequence, we should be able to hear a wide range of views and arguments, we might be much less comfortable that other people can make the same distinctions, will come to good decisions, exercise good judgment when listening to those ideas. And so as a consequence, there's a certain arrogance where we want to impose our own beliefs on others and shield them from the opposition; shield them from listening to the critics so that the only voices they hear are our own. And it's difficult to resist that tendency and that instinct, precisely because when we're thinking about what ideas in society we find as wrongheaded, disturbing, maybe dangerous, it becomes all the more tempting to think, when confronted with that dangerous id...
For the full transcript, check out https://bigthink.com/sponsored-institute-for-humane-studies/john-stuart-mill
https://wn.com/John_Stuart_Mill's_Big_Idea_Harsh_Critics_Make_Good_Thinkers_|_Keith_Whittington_|_Big_Think
John Stuart Mill's big idea: Harsh critics make good thinkers
New videos DAILY: https://bigth.ink
Join Big Think Edge for exclusive video lessons from top thinkers and doers: https://bigth.ink/Edge
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
19th-century political philosopher John Stuart Mill defended the right of free societies to explore radical and dangerous ideas.
One of his arguments was based on humility: You must be prepared to be wrong, and genuinely be open to being persuaded. Put your ideas into intellectual battle by exposing them to the harshest critics. These critics will show up your flaws and make you a more sophisticated thinker.
Another of Mill's arguments was concerned with arrogance. He criticized the common tendency to want to shield other people from dangerous ideas as paternalistic. You can judge good ideas from bad ideas; you should afford everyone the same respect.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KEITH WHITTINGTON
Keith E. Whittington is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics at Princeton University. He is the author, most recently, of "Speak Freely: Why Universities Must Defend Free Speech", as well as "Repugnant Laws: Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present".
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRANSCRIPT:
KEITH WHITTINGTON: John Stuart Mill was an extraordinary and influential thinker in the early 19th century in England. He was something of a radical within his society at the time and, as a consequence, was very interested in the ability to develop and communicate radical ideas that were outside the mainstream, because he was interested in a lot of those ideas himself, and he was much more interested in how a free society should operate the ability of people to think for themselves in a free society, and sometimes run against the grain of public opinion and mainstream thought in general.
He offered a variety of arguments about why it is we ought to value that kind of speech, those kinds of spaces, that kind of robust debate. So one of those arguments I characterize as an argument driven by humility. That is, that part of what Mill wanted to remind us is that we all might be mistaken, that our own understanding is limited. Our own set of ideas are very limited. And that we can learn from each other. And we can learn from others who have different ideas than ourselves. But that requires some willingness to accept the possibility that we, in fact, might be mistaken. And of course, we walk around most of the time with the belief that we are upholding a set of correct ideas, that we think we know our own minds. We think the ideas we hold are true. That's why we hold them in the first place. And so it can be challenging to go into a conversation and go into a discussion, go into a public space and accept the possibility that we might be wrong. But Mill wanted to emphasize that it's only by accepting that possibility that we're wrong that we can have the opportunity to learn. And it's important for our own sake that we be able to continue to learn and grow by talking to people with different ideas and being genuinely open to the possibility that they might persuade us. They might show the flaws in our ideas. They might expose our mistakes. And as a consequence, they might help us make progress.
But he also constructs an argument that's really grounded instead on a concern with arrogance of others. Here, the concern is not so much that we be willing to hear from people that we disagree with because we accept the possibility that we might be wrong. But instead, he wants to speak to our instincts to want to suppress opinions that we find disagreeable or dangerous so that no one else can hear them, instead. And this is fundamentally a paternalistic concern, a concern that we're worried about other people, that they might be misled by bad ideas. And so even if we think that we ourselves are capable of separating good ideas from bad ideas, and so as consequence, we should be able to hear a wide range of views and arguments, we might be much less comfortable that other people can make the same distinctions, will come to good decisions, exercise good judgment when listening to those ideas. And so as a consequence, there's a certain arrogance where we want to impose our own beliefs on others and shield them from the opposition; shield them from listening to the critics so that the only voices they hear are our own. And it's difficult to resist that tendency and that instinct, precisely because when we're thinking about what ideas in society we find as wrongheaded, disturbing, maybe dangerous, it becomes all the more tempting to think, when confronted with that dangerous id...
For the full transcript, check out https://bigthink.com/sponsored-institute-for-humane-studies/john-stuart-mill
- published: 08 May 2019
- views: 31170
8:24
John Stuart Mill: An Introduction (On Liberty, Utilitarianism, The Subjection of Women)
http://www.tomrichey.net
John Stuart Mill, a 19th century English philosopher, wrote three books at are still widely-read today: On Liberty, Utilitarianism, a...
http://www.tomrichey.net
John Stuart Mill, a 19th century English philosopher, wrote three books at are still widely-read today: On Liberty, Utilitarianism, and The Subjection of Women. This is a brief introduction to Mill and his work for students taking survey-level courses in philosophy and AP European History.
https://wn.com/John_Stuart_Mill_An_Introduction_(On_Liberty,_Utilitarianism,_The_Subjection_Of_Women)
http://www.tomrichey.net
John Stuart Mill, a 19th century English philosopher, wrote three books at are still widely-read today: On Liberty, Utilitarianism, and The Subjection of Women. This is a brief introduction to Mill and his work for students taking survey-level courses in philosophy and AP European History.
- published: 17 Apr 2014
- views: 179447
11:10
John Stuart Mill - On Liberty
On Liberty by John Stuart Mill - http://amzn.to/1P09fNn (affiliate link)
===================================================
In this lecture we look at John Stu...
On Liberty by John Stuart Mill - http://amzn.to/1P09fNn (affiliate link)
===================================================
In this lecture we look at John Stuart Mill's influential work "On Liberty" in which he argues for the importance of individual liberties, especially freedom of opinion and expression.
===================================================
Support us on Patreon: http://patreon.com/academyofideas
Get the transcript: http://academyofideas.com/2013/08/john-stuart-mill-on-liberty/
===================================================
https://wn.com/John_Stuart_Mill_On_Liberty
On Liberty by John Stuart Mill - http://amzn.to/1P09fNn (affiliate link)
===================================================
In this lecture we look at John Stuart Mill's influential work "On Liberty" in which he argues for the importance of individual liberties, especially freedom of opinion and expression.
===================================================
Support us on Patreon: http://patreon.com/academyofideas
Get the transcript: http://academyofideas.com/2013/08/john-stuart-mill-on-liberty/
===================================================
- published: 20 Aug 2013
- views: 305369
10:01
Utilitarianism: Crash Course Philosophy #36
Our next stop in our tour of the ethical lay of the land is utilitarianism. With a little help from Batman, Hank explains the principle of utility, and the diff...
Our next stop in our tour of the ethical lay of the land is utilitarianism. With a little help from Batman, Hank explains the principle of utility, and the difference between act and rule utilitarianism.
--
Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios
--
Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashC...
Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse
Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com
Support CrashCourse on Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/crashcourse
CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
https://wn.com/Utilitarianism_Crash_Course_Philosophy_36
Our next stop in our tour of the ethical lay of the land is utilitarianism. With a little help from Batman, Hank explains the principle of utility, and the difference between act and rule utilitarianism.
--
Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios
--
Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashC...
Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse
Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com
Support CrashCourse on Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/crashcourse
CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
- published: 21 Nov 2016
- views: 4930710
5:28
JOHN STUART MILL (1) – ASSOCIACIONISMO E QUÍMICA MENTAL | EMPIRISMO BRITÂNICO
John Stuart Mill foi filósofo e economista. Filho de James Mill (que já estudamos anteriormente), John Stuart nasceu em Londres no ano de 1806 e faleceu na Fran...
John Stuart Mill foi filósofo e economista. Filho de James Mill (que já estudamos anteriormente), John Stuart nasceu em Londres no ano de 1806 e faleceu na França em 1873. Embora seu pai tenha sido um grande filósofo, John conseguiu superá-lo e é conhecido como o filósofo britânico mais influente do século XIX.
--------------------------
Obras sugeridas:
“An Introduction to the History of Psychology”, 7 ed., de B. Hergenhahn e Tracy Henley.
“A Conceptual History of Psychology”, de John D. Greenwood.
https://wn.com/John_Stuart_Mill_(1)_–_Associacionismo_E_Química_Mental_|_Empirismo_Britânico
John Stuart Mill foi filósofo e economista. Filho de James Mill (que já estudamos anteriormente), John Stuart nasceu em Londres no ano de 1806 e faleceu na França em 1873. Embora seu pai tenha sido um grande filósofo, John conseguiu superá-lo e é conhecido como o filósofo britânico mais influente do século XIX.
--------------------------
Obras sugeridas:
“An Introduction to the History of Psychology”, 7 ed., de B. Hergenhahn e Tracy Henley.
“A Conceptual History of Psychology”, de John D. Greenwood.
- published: 22 Apr 2019
- views: 3286
7:04
JOHN STUART MILL (2) – UMA CIÊNCIA DA NATUREZA HUMANA – EMPIRISMO BRITÂNICO
John Locke, David Hume e David Hartley foram alguns dos filósofos que se esforçaram no sentido de criar uma ciência da mente tendo como base o paradigma das ciê...
John Locke, David Hume e David Hartley foram alguns dos filósofos que se esforçaram no sentido de criar uma ciência da mente tendo como base o paradigma das ciências naturais, mas foi John Stuart Mill (o mais respeitado filósofo da ciência de seu tempo) quem mais contribuiu para o desenvolvimento da Psicologia como uma ciência.
Mill recusava a ideia comum de que pensamentos, sentimentos e ações não estariam sujeitos à análise científica. Segundo ele, qualquer sistema que seja regulado por leis está sujeito ao estudo científico, mesmo quando essas leis ainda não são compreendidas.
Nesse vídeo, veremos como Mill entende a Ciência da Natureza Humana.
--------------------------
Obras sugeridas:
“An Introduction to the History of Psychology”, 7 ed., de B. Hergenhahn e Tracy Henley.
“A Conceptual History of Psychology”, de John D. Greenwood.
https://wn.com/John_Stuart_Mill_(2)_–_Uma_Ciência_Da_Natureza_Humana_–_Empirismo_Britânico
John Locke, David Hume e David Hartley foram alguns dos filósofos que se esforçaram no sentido de criar uma ciência da mente tendo como base o paradigma das ciências naturais, mas foi John Stuart Mill (o mais respeitado filósofo da ciência de seu tempo) quem mais contribuiu para o desenvolvimento da Psicologia como uma ciência.
Mill recusava a ideia comum de que pensamentos, sentimentos e ações não estariam sujeitos à análise científica. Segundo ele, qualquer sistema que seja regulado por leis está sujeito ao estudo científico, mesmo quando essas leis ainda não são compreendidas.
Nesse vídeo, veremos como Mill entende a Ciência da Natureza Humana.
--------------------------
Obras sugeridas:
“An Introduction to the History of Psychology”, 7 ed., de B. Hergenhahn e Tracy Henley.
“A Conceptual History of Psychology”, de John D. Greenwood.
- published: 25 Apr 2019
- views: 1495
4:14
John Stuart Mill, Sulla libertà - Corrado Augias
Una iniziativa congiunta di editori, scrittori e librai
La legge attualmente in discussione al Senato relativa alla pubblicabilità degli atti giudiziari appr...
Una iniziativa congiunta di editori, scrittori e librai
La legge attualmente in discussione al Senato relativa alla pubblicabilità degli atti giudiziari approvata in Commissione Giustizia configura una grave limitazione della libertà di informazione dei cittadini.
Una libertà essenziale, tutelata non solo dalla nostra Costituzione ma anche dalla Corte europea dei diritti dell'uomo. Una libertà che si coniuga strettamente alla libertà di stampa che è la precondizione del lavoro di chi scrive, pubblica e diffonde i libri. Ci sembra importante dare un contributo alla riflessione e all'approfondimento di un tema centrale di ogni Stato di diritto, di ogni democrazia liberale. Riflessioni e approfondimenti che in gran parte sono contenuti nei libri: classici e contemporanei, di narrativa e di poesia, come di saggistica o manualistica.
Da qui l'iniziativa che promuoviamo come librai ed editori nella settimana dal 31 maggio al 6 giugno: reading di libri sulla libertà nelle librerie italiane.
Ciascuna libreria organizzerà ora e giorno delle letture con autori e lettori, secondo un calendario che verrà reso noto nei prossimi giorni.
La manifestazione di apertura si terrà al Teatro Quirino di Roma lunedì 31 maggio, alle ore 17.00.
Parteciperanno editori, librai e diversi autori - tra cui Corrado Augias, Carlo Bernardini, Andrea Camilleri, Gianrico Carofiglio, Guido Crainz, Rosetta Loy, Valerio Magrelli, Alessandro Pace, Antonio Pascale, Christian Raimo, Stefano Rodotà, Giovanni Sartori, Tiziano Scarpa, Marco Travaglio, Nadia Urbinati, Chiara Valerio - che leggeranno brani di libri dedicati alla libertà, di informazione, di opinione e di scelta, di stampa.
Promuovono l'iniziativa:
Marco Cassini e Daniele di Gennaro (minimum fax)
Alessandro e Giuseppe Laterza (Editori Laterza)
Stefano Mauri (Gruppo editoriale Mauri Spagnol)
https://wn.com/John_Stuart_Mill,_Sulla_Libertà_Corrado_Augias
Una iniziativa congiunta di editori, scrittori e librai
La legge attualmente in discussione al Senato relativa alla pubblicabilità degli atti giudiziari approvata in Commissione Giustizia configura una grave limitazione della libertà di informazione dei cittadini.
Una libertà essenziale, tutelata non solo dalla nostra Costituzione ma anche dalla Corte europea dei diritti dell'uomo. Una libertà che si coniuga strettamente alla libertà di stampa che è la precondizione del lavoro di chi scrive, pubblica e diffonde i libri. Ci sembra importante dare un contributo alla riflessione e all'approfondimento di un tema centrale di ogni Stato di diritto, di ogni democrazia liberale. Riflessioni e approfondimenti che in gran parte sono contenuti nei libri: classici e contemporanei, di narrativa e di poesia, come di saggistica o manualistica.
Da qui l'iniziativa che promuoviamo come librai ed editori nella settimana dal 31 maggio al 6 giugno: reading di libri sulla libertà nelle librerie italiane.
Ciascuna libreria organizzerà ora e giorno delle letture con autori e lettori, secondo un calendario che verrà reso noto nei prossimi giorni.
La manifestazione di apertura si terrà al Teatro Quirino di Roma lunedì 31 maggio, alle ore 17.00.
Parteciperanno editori, librai e diversi autori - tra cui Corrado Augias, Carlo Bernardini, Andrea Camilleri, Gianrico Carofiglio, Guido Crainz, Rosetta Loy, Valerio Magrelli, Alessandro Pace, Antonio Pascale, Christian Raimo, Stefano Rodotà, Giovanni Sartori, Tiziano Scarpa, Marco Travaglio, Nadia Urbinati, Chiara Valerio - che leggeranno brani di libri dedicati alla libertà, di informazione, di opinione e di scelta, di stampa.
Promuovono l'iniziativa:
Marco Cassini e Daniele di Gennaro (minimum fax)
Alessandro e Giuseppe Laterza (Editori Laterza)
Stefano Mauri (Gruppo editoriale Mauri Spagnol)
- published: 04 Jun 2010
- views: 5449
7:49
Law and Justice - Utilitarianism - 21.4 John Stuart Mill
“Law and Justice" is a free online course on Janux that is open to anyone. Learn more at http://janux.ou.edu.
Created by the University of Oklahoma, Janux is a...
“Law and Justice" is a free online course on Janux that is open to anyone. Learn more at http://janux.ou.edu.
Created by the University of Oklahoma, Janux is an interactive learning community that gives learners direct connections to courses, education resources, faculty, and each other. Janux courses are freely available or may be taken for college credit by enrolled OU students.
Dr. Kyle Harper is Associate Professor of Classics and Letters,
Video by NextThought (http://nextthought.com).
Copyright © 2000-2014 The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, All Rights Reserved.
https://wn.com/Law_And_Justice_Utilitarianism_21.4_John_Stuart_Mill
“Law and Justice" is a free online course on Janux that is open to anyone. Learn more at http://janux.ou.edu.
Created by the University of Oklahoma, Janux is an interactive learning community that gives learners direct connections to courses, education resources, faculty, and each other. Janux courses are freely available or may be taken for college credit by enrolled OU students.
Dr. Kyle Harper is Associate Professor of Classics and Letters,
Video by NextThought (http://nextthought.com).
Copyright © 2000-2014 The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, All Rights Reserved.
- published: 29 Jul 2014
- views: 16328