RSS
I wanted to believe it so badly. But the story was too delicious, too outrageous to be true. We are talking about the recent conspiracy theory according to which Brigitte Macron, the wife of Emmanuel Macron, is in fact a man.
However far-fetched it may sound, it is currently doing the rounds in American and French media after being presented to a mass audience by black influencer Candace Owens (6.8 million followers on Xitter) in a six-part series on YouTube (part 1 has 3.8 million clicks to date).
It has received further exposure through advertising by Tucker Carlson, arguably the most influential American conservative journalist at the moment. (Meanwhile, also Joe Rogan has taken the bait, so the whole thing will probably soon become “alternative mainstream”.)
Carlson described how sceptical he had initially been about this theory ardently promoted his clever and nice friend Candace. Despite all his love for her, he felt it was “flat earth” territory that he would rather not enter.
But now, lo and behold, he is amazed to admit: “And then it turns out – she’s right! My mind is blown!” His interview partner, a former Fox News colleague named Clayton Morris, invited to shed light on the infamous Israeli attack on an American ship in 1967, enthusiastically agreed:
The Candace Owens pieces on this are phenomenal. I’m giving Candace Owens full credit for really opening up this story from the French journalists who first broke it, and then were I think, like, ostracised and basically told not to report it.
I don’t know whether Carlson and Morris sat through the tedious, more than six hours during which Owens presented the matter and “asked questions” interrupted by announcements from her (now probably very happy) sponsors, or whether they, like your humble narrator, have actually read the English translation of the book Becoming Brigitte by the right-wing French “investigative journalist” Xavier Poussard, which is now being marketed under Owens’ brand (seemingly a poorly edited AI translation; for example, the personal pronouns constantly change, sometimes within a single sentence).
Even though I only listened to parts of the series on YouTube, I was hooked and ordered the book. It proved to be a captivating and rather illuminating read that kept me enthralled for a few days, but for entirely different reasons than those intended by Xavier Poussard.
What’s the story? I’ll sum it up for you, so you don’t have to go down that rabbit hole.
It all started with a lady named Natacha Rey, who is described by Xavier Poussard (a frequent guest on Alain Soral’s Égalité & Reconciliation, which regularly promotes his work) as an “ordinary, self-taught citizen”, i.e. not a journalist who has “investigated along the usual methodology”.
She was irritated by Brigitte Macron’s “unusual” physique, as she wrote on Facebook:
[T]he width of her neck, her shoulders, the length of her ribcage compared to her narrow, waistless lower body. Hence this unbalanced silhouette, her virile gait always with long strides, this way of sitting naturally with her legs apart.
The striking, somewhat harsh and masculine appearance of Brigitte Macron (born 1953) is one of the reasons why the transgender theory seems instantly plausible or at least conceivable to many people. Another is the unusual optics of the Macrons themselves.
Emmanuel Macron (born 1977) is a handsome, relatively young man who looks a bit like Alain Delon. Since 2007, Macron has been married to a woman who is almost 24 years older than he is and who, in terms of age, could be his mother.
Since the sexual attractiveness of men fades more slowly than that of women for biological (and socio-biological) reasons, this is a constellation much less common than the opposite-sex variant. The story is made even more unusual by the fact that the love affair had already begun when Emmanuel was still a teenager and Brigitte was his 40-year-old teacher.
On top of that, the couple presents themselves in an extremely “LGBTQ”-friendly way, and Macron, apart from repeating rumours, has a certain narcissistic, suspiciously homosexual aura about him (this is my impression at least). And I guess you have all seen the photos of him embracing sweaty, half-naked black thugs with visible excitement gleaming in his eyes. Whatever the case may be, there seems to be something odd about him and his sexuality.
In the 2018 documentary Un Roman Français by Virginie Linhart, Natacha Rey came across a photo of the Trogneux family (Brigitte’s maiden name) from 1954 that seemed suspicious to her.
It was supposed to show baby Brigitte on her mother’s lap, but Rey had the impression that another person on the far left of the picture looked much more like Brigitte today, even a “spitting image”. As it turned out later, this is “officially” Brigitte’s older brother Jean-Michel Trogneux, born in 1945.
The first version spun by Natacha Rey on the basis of this intuition was as follows: Brigitte is in fact the boy on the left, not the baby on the right in the photo. After a sex change, this Jean-Michel called himself “Brigitte” and is identical to the Brigitte Macron we know today.
Before his “transformation” (still according to Natacha Rey), Jean-Michel fathered three children with a woman named Catherine Audoy, who are now considered Brigitte’s official offspring from her first marriage to a banker called André Auzière: Sébastien (1975), Laurénce (1977) and Tiphaine (1984).
According to Rey, they carry the surname “Auzière” because they were adopted by a man named Jean-Louis Auzière when he married Catherine Audoy. “Brigitte Trogneux” and “André Auzière” are merely fictitious characters in this version of the story, invented to conceal Brigitte’s true identity and biography.
According to Mr. Poussard, the following occurred: In June 2021, Madame Rey sent Madame Audoy two sets of photos via WhatsApp which were supposed to prove that Jean-Michel is identical to Brigitte and Jean-Louis is identical to André, accompanied by the words “I know everything. I know everything about you, Jean-Michel, Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine!”
Three weeks later, the police were at Rey’s doorstep, arrested her and subjected her to a harsh interrogation, during which she was threatened and harassed. At least that’s how she told it (among others) to journalist Emmanuelle Anizon, who wrote a book aiming to debunk the “fake news” of this conspiracy theory.
Poussard reports also that, after Rey named him as one of her journalistic contacts, his house was searched and the webmaster of his own site Faits & Documents (which had taken up the theory in May-April with a large dossier) was arrested.
Natacha Rey got into trouble again when she presented her accusations and theories about the identity of Brigitte Macron in epic detail in a four-hour (now deleted) YouTube interview (which was simultaneously streamed on Twitch, Facebook, VK and Odysee) with a clairvoyant who goes by the stage name Amandine Roy on 10 December 2021.
Both ladies with the “royal” surname were sentenced to pay damages of 8,000 and 5,000 euros respectively to Brigitte Macron and her brother Jean-Michel Trogneux, who, together with the Auzière offspring and his sister, was one of the plaintiffs – and thus, apparently, does actually exist.
These harsh reactions naturally fuelled the zeal of the amateur detectives even more. Had they really uncovered a state secret? And why, why didn’t Brigitte just publish documents that would confirm the identities of everyone involved beyond any doubt, why no photos from her “former” life as Madame Auzière and mother of three children? That would have settled the matter once and for all!
The lack of publicly available photos and documents from the time before Brigitte Trogneux-Auzière met Emmanuel Macron is one of the main suspicions of “conspiracy theorists”. They suspect that something is being deliberately hidden.
The perception that little material is available about Brigitte’s life as Madame Auzière is apparently accurate. The family seems indeed to be very keen to keep their private affairs out of the public eye. Poussard quotes Virginie Linhart, the director of Un Roman Français:
The interviewees, apart from her former students, all had the authorization of the Élysée Palace and were very careful about what they said. There is a thick wall of silence. The level of control and checking is, well, quite astounding. (…) [The film] is a 90-minute very personal portrait. For it, I needed photos of young Brigitte Macron, small children… that would show an itinerary, not those approved by the Bestimage agency. What doesn’t come out is everything to do with her past life. It’s a total blackout.
I guess this is another reason why the theory catches on with many people: Poussard & Co are undoubtedly right when they emphasise that both Brigitte Macron’s and Emmanuel Macron’s public personas are media-made shiny facades.
Macron, originally an investment banker in the service of Rothschild & Co., was from the outset a kind of “test-tube” politician, carefully groomed and pulled out of the hat to be presented to the electorate in 2016 as a centrist saviour from the “right-wing populist” danger. Jacques Attali, a grey eminence of the globalist elites in France, even openly boasted: “I discovered Emmanuel Macron. I invented him.”
The media offensive in favor of Macron also had to present his strange relationship with Brigitte in a palatable way. This apparently involved a number of “cosmetic corrections” (such as Emmanuel’s age when the two met), which the investigators are now pouncing on. As is so often the case, the driving force is a profound mistrust of the ruling political elites, which is of course completely justified.
In the wake of the first version of the theory, which spread like wildfire on social media, various investigators set out to either refute or confirm it.
Poussard as well found birth announcements of Brigitte Trogneux (mentioning her brother Jean-Michel) in old newspapers, as well as of Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine, of course under the name “Auzière”. When he confronted Natacha Rey with this, she dismissed all these finds with the same old answer: “It’s all fake!”
Now that there was sufficient confirmation that Brigitte Trogneux and Jean-Michel Trogneux are (or at least were) two different people and that Brigitte had indeed married a real, now deceased man named André Auzière in 1974, the theory had to be modified.
In the revised version by Xavier Poussard, it now reads as follows: a Brigitte Trogneux, born on 13 April 1953, did in fact exist. She is the person who can be seen on the few photos that officially show today’s Brigitte Macron before 1986: the family photo from 1954, a first communion photo from 1963 and a wedding photo from 1974 published in April 2019 in the magazine Le Point.
And now comes the banger. According to Poussard, this Brigitte Auzière née Trogneux is not identical to the Brigitte Macron we know today.
This Brigitte Auzière is said to have died sometime in the 1980s. After that, her brother Jean-Michel took over her identity. Brigitte Macron is therefore not the mother, but the aunt (or rather uncle) of Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine. So there are two Brigittes in this mysterious family saga, a real one (Trogneux), who has died; and a false one (Macron), who has assumed her identity.
This is the crux of the matter, on which Poussard’s theory stands or falls, and it is precisely what he is unable to substantiate or prove in any way.
Since there is no death certificate for Brigitte Trogneux and no grave, her family must have covered up her death. How is that possible? Was there no one outside the family who noticed her disappearance? Was there no one who noticed that a completely different person was now acting under her name? And what happened to her body? Was it buried in the Auzières’ garden?
As outlined in the book, all of this is pure invention, to fill the crucial gap in the theory of how Jean-Michel could become Brigitte. Because we have no proof whatsoever this supposed “identity theft” actually happened, we are left with our own imagination. Poussard speculates that maybe the real Brigitte Trogneux “knowing she was doomed by a serious illness, entrusted the custody of her children and her identity to this brother to whom she was so close and who had always felt like a woman.”
But such an improbable, melodramatic scenario still doesn’t explain why this whole manoeuvre was carried out and why the entire Auzière-Trogneux clan went along with it.
There is now another complication for Poussard’s theory, one that completely undermines it.
In January 2022, the journalist Jonathan Moadab, a Jewish (yet anti-Zionist) opponent of Macron who has written for the conservative weekly Valeurs actuelles and RT France, published a number of documents proving that Jean-Michel Trogneux is not only a real person, but that he still lives in Amiens under that name today: An extract from the birth certificate, an entry in the city’s electoral roll, and a marriage certificate from 1980 documenting Jean-Michel’s marriage to a certain Véronique Dreux (with Brigitte as the maid of honour). In a footnote, Poussard himself confirms the existence of a social security number and a car and licence plate under the name Jean-Michel Trogneux.
Moadab reported that he visited this Jean-Michel Trogneux at his official, easily found address in Amiens (where there is also a Trogneux family shop), but that he refused to speak to him.
Finally, Moadab published a video of Macron’s inauguration on 14 May 2017 at the Élysée Palace, in which a man can be seen who he claims is none other but Jean-Michel Trogneux, identical to the gentleman he saw face to face in Amiens. This man appears in several photos and videos of official events with the Macrons.
Poussard is naturally not satisfied with this. Where is the proof, he asks, that this man, whom he refers to as “the chubby guy” (le petit gros), is the same person who lives in Amiens under that name and who turned away Moadab at the front door? He has no explanation (not even a theory) who le petit gros or the guy named Jean-Michel Trogneux in Amiens really is (Ockham’s razor: he is Jean-Michel Trogneux, Brigitte Macron’s brother, née Trogneux, and also the “chubby guy”).
And now enter Poussard’s big trump card. Since the whole theory is based on perceived similarities, which are often interpreted very subjectively depending on the observer, he examined the existing photos using the Chinese facial recognition software Face+++.
Stamp-sized black-and-white reproductions with the AI’s assessments take up a considerable part of his book, including comparisons with the youth and old age photos of several celebrities from Brigitte’s generation (like Kim Basinger or Isabelle Huppert) or Jean-Michel’s former schoolmates.
(Almost) every time, the AI provides him with the desired – because suspicious – results. Some other childhood portraits of Jean-Michel that Poussard tracked down show between 57.73% and 66.97% similarity with “the chubby guy.” The similarity of these images with pictures of the later and present Brigitte is however only slightly higher, between 62.2% and 68.29%. Matches between the 1974 wedding photo of Brigitte Auzière and various photos of the present Brigitte Macron range between just 48% and 57.7%, which Poussard presents as proof they are not the same person.
Funnily enough, there is no AI comparison between the photo of Jean-Michel which started it all (the family photo from 1954) and photos of today’s Brigitte. Poussard merely mentions in a footnote that both “Brigitte” and “the chubby guy” only achieved a 55% match with the family photo boy.
According to Poussard this picture is unusable anyway, because Jean-Michel’s teeth were “obviously” changed afterwards to match the “repaired” teeth of today’s Brigitte (also a lampshade was retouched!!). Of course, this makes no logical sense, because the conspirators would rather seek to obscure the traces between Brigitte and Jean-Michel than to align them.
It is obvious, of course, why the AI method is weak evidence. The poor quality of the photos, the camera angles, the facial expressions, the fact that Brigitte has had several facelifts, etc., all this naturally affects the results.
The “bombshell” that is supposed to dispel any doubt finally explodes on page 287 (of the English edition). Candace Owens and Xavier Poussard present this find as the great, decisive proof that should convince even the last sceptic.
After a long, obsessive search, Poussard finally managed to recover a youthful portrait of Jean-Michel from 1964 from the depths of an archive.
I can only imagine how excited, almost ecstatic Poussard must have been when he found this photo. On it, Jean-Michel indeed looks remarkably like Brigitte Macron. At least that was my immediate impression. However, I showed it to several friends, all of whom were less impressed and saw more differences than similarities.
The problem for Poussard is that Jean-Michel is wearing glasses in this picture. This ironically makes this one crucial trophy photo unsuitable for AI verification.
Poussard’s reliance on visual similarities also backfires when it comes to “the chubby guy”, whose existence creates a huge problem for his theory. Because this man, even though he has grown old and fat, clearly has features of the Trogneux family, especially in terms of his nose, ears and mouth-chin area.
Now a sceptical friend of mine, just for fun, used a Face app to make “the chubby guy” look younger. The result is crude, but bears a clear resemblance to Jean-Michel’s childhood photos. What are the chances that “the chubby guy” is just some actor with no family connection to the Trogneux clan?
So the simplest explanation is the official one: Jean-Michel from 1954 and 1964 looks so much like Brigitte simply because he is her brother. With age, the resemblance faded because Jean-Michel has gained weight and Brigitte today is a scrawny bean pole with multiple facelifts.
That would be the “Brigitte Macron is a man” theory in its essential features. I have to leave out countless details, assertions and associations that Poussard brings into play, which are without exception weak or downright irrelevant, for reasons of space and to spare the reader more rabbit hole spergery.
However, I cannot leave two particular delicacies unmentioned.
First, there is the male-to-female transsexual “Véronique”, who appeared anonymously in silhouette on a French television programme in 1977. It is striking that his voice cannot be distinguished from that of a woman (a friend of mine claims she can hear the subdued male pitch, which is impossible for me). According to the extended theory, this person is identical to Jean-Michel Trogneux and thus to Brigitte Macron.
Poussard, for example, believes that one can clearly tell from the intonation, the choice of words and the voice that they are the same person, always considering the fact that Brigitte Macron’s present voice has of course aged quite a lot since. A graphic, taken from the Audacity programme, is also supposed to prove the identity of the voices.
It seems particularly striking to Poussard and Candace (whose French is the most atrocious rape of a language I have ever heard) that Véronique uses the phrase “c’est à dire”, which Brigitte Macron has also done (and practically every living Frenchman and -woman). Véronique mentions Chopin, and decades later the French press reported that Emmanuel likes to play Chopin on the piano for his wife. Do you need more proof??
At some point, I sat there and started comparing
Now," href==https://counter-currents.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/veronique-260x194.webp][/Image] Now, if “Véronique” is Jean-Michel (and thus Brigitte Macron), then Poussard’s theory faces serious problems (which he doesn’t seem to realise). The moderator explicitly states that Véronique has already had her operation. She, in turn, explains that “women” of her kind can “copulate, but not procreate” (copuler, mais pas procréer).
However, according to official documents that Poussard not only does not doubt but incorporates into his narrative, Jean-Michel Trogneux married in 1980 and fathered two children. How was that possible if Véronique had already been “post-op”? Did she retain her reproductive organ? And did she re-identify as a man for the purpose of the wedding?
Neither Poussard nor Owens bother to explain, let alone address blatant inconsistencies and contradictions like these. They simply sweep these elephants under the rug. Poussard wriggles his way out by evasively stating that Jean-Michel and his wife “declared” these two children as theirs “whatever the materiality of the couple they formed.”
As for Jean-Michel’s children, they lead us to the second delicacy, the absolute cherry on the top of the theory cake.
His son Jean-Jacques Trogneux, born in 1982, bears a striking resemblance to Emmanuel Macron, according to the unmaskers. At least in some photos of Jean-Jacques, such a similarity can indeed be seen; see for example this sample poll video shot in a French city centre – almost everyone questioned immediately associates Macron with the image of Jean-Jacques.
But what would be the implication? Poussard only hints at it: since he also believes that there are gaps and inconsistencies in the biography of Emmanuel Macron, the whole thing implicitly amounts to the fact that Macron and Jean-Jacques Trogneux are related, possibly half-brothers, possibly both sons of Jean-Michel.
And because Jean-Michel, as we all know now, is in fact Brigitte, this in turn would mean that Emmanuel married his own sex-changed father.
To add fuel to this mind-boggling suggestion, Poussard gives his book an epilogue about “The Blood of the Rothschilds”, whose long-lived dynasty he attributes to extensive incestuous-endogamous practices. In doing so, he relies on statements from Nathalie Reims, the cousin of David de Rothschild, who in turn is one of Macron’s most important supporters.
I’ll leave out the references to Satanism (Satanists also love incest, as you all know) and a wedding cake that is supposedly decorated “with the horns of Baphomet” (they look more like an antelope antlers). Paedo-satanic allegations of course belong to the standard repertoire of QAnon and related conspiracyland flavors. Poussard does not explain what this mixture of sinister allusions, which he tries very hard to link to his theory, is supposed to really mean.
Politically, of course, the Brigitte thesis boils down to bringing down the French arm of the global “cabal” by exposing this one swindle (which, if true, wouldn’t be that evil after all in my humble opinion, unless you are buying into the “statutory rape” and “paedophilia” frame Poussard and Owens are trying to impose on the story, which I don’t.)
In this script, Brigitte Macron is not just a transsexual (like supposedly Michelle Obama), but a puppet-master connected to the Rothschild clan, paedophile rings and the LGBTQ mafia, who truly rules the Élysée Palace while the gay, weak-willed cocaine-addicted Emmanuel is just a puppet. This probably also explains the missionary, fanatical zeal of the devout Catholic Poussard (Owens is a Catholic convert as well).
I have the impression that Poussard is seriously, almost religiously convinced of the truth of his theory and sees himself as a kind of crusader of God. The introductory page to his chapter “Looking for Jean-Michel Trogneux”, in which he – after 240 pages – gets to the heart of his research, is heraldically adorned with quotations from Nietzsche, Chesterton, Malraux and Pierre Schoendorffer (a film director much appreciated by French right-wingers), all of which revolve around the theme of lies and truth.
Owens, who is far less clever than she and her fans think, is probably sincerely convinced as well, but she is also an extremely business-minded American who has stumbled upon a goldmine for her sponsors.
Since people like Tucker Carlson are now picking up this theory and promoting it, it is becoming “respectable”, if not proven, in parts of the right-wing bubble. But as I have shown, this is not the case at all. Rather, it is one of the most poorly reasoned conspiracy theories I have ever seen (and I’m a staunch 9-11-Truther and Oxfordian). Carlson and Owens have (once again) done significant damage to the reputation of the “alternative media.”
This is, of course, only in the eyes of that remaining minority for whom content is more important than mere click quantities. Exciting, sensational stories like the Brigitte Macron theory will always have a greater reach than sober analysis and factual presentations.
I realise that the label “conspiracy theory” is often used as a weapon to ridicule dissidents and critics of the powers that be. Any doubt that the rich and powerful of this planet may be something other than benevolent humanists and democrats will earn you this badge of shame. As a means to stigmatise doubters and adversaries it has grown weak however, mainly because it has been overused. During the Covid years we often saw “conspiracy theories” turn miraculously into truth after only a few months or even weeks.
My own approach to any “conspiracy theory” would be simply to check how strong its arguments are. It would be foolish to deny that conspiracies, false flag operations, media manipulations and cover-ups really happen. Also, the problem of cognitive bias is a general human phenomenon, not just of “conspiracy theorists” but also of their “debunkers.”
In this respect, Poussard is, in my opinion, a fascinating case. Becoming Brigitte is meticulously researched, with endless detailed biographies of the main and supporting actors in the drama, both in the text and in the footnotes.
But as a critical reader, you constantly stumble over Poussard’s distortions, suggestions, insinuations, interpretations, plot holes and cognitive twists until you almost get dizzy or want to throw the book against the wall in anger.
Poussard reminded me of two characters in films: on the one hand Jake Gyllenhaal in the thriller Zodiac (2007) by David Fincher, playing a journalist who, for over a decade, manically tries to find out the identity of a mysterious serial killer (who actually existed and whose case was never solved).
His obsessive search leads him into a labyrinth of clues, suspicions, bizarre coincidences, false tracks and dead ends. When he believes he has finally identified the culprit, he escapes again, this time for good.
The other is David Hemmings in the arthouse classic Blow Up (1966) by Michelangelo Antonioni. A hip fashion photographer in 1960s London becomes obsessed with the idea that a few photos taken by chance in a park show evidence of a murder.
To this end, he makes ever larger prints (“blow ups”) of details of these photos, until only the grain can be seen. He does indeed find a body in the park one night, but it has disappeared the next day. The film leaves it open whether his imagination has played a trick on him or whether he was really on the trail of a murder case.
I see Xavier Poussard as someone who, based on his subjective perception, has become fixated on an idea and built a house of cards of cathedral-like proportions on it, which grows ever larger the more “indirect” evidence he finds to support the structure.
Like the characters in Fincher’s and Antonioni’s films, what he is looking for eludes him every time he finally thinks he has it in front of his nose. After a long search, he finds a phenomenal photo that seems to confirm all his theories, but he cannot use his main tool, the Chinese facial recognition software, because the object of his search is wearing glasses in the photo.
He repeatedly comes into contact with supporting actors of the drama who refuse to provide him with evidence even when he promises not to publish it and to withdraw his claims if they are conclusive. As a reader, you find yourself rooting for Poussard as he plunges into the next and the next investigation, only to return empty-handed and with a few more speculations in tow again and again.
Towards the end of the book, this Captain Ahab finally seems to get his “white whale” in his sights. He manages to track down the phone number of Jean-Michel’s ex-wife Véronique (she has the same first name as the transsexual in the 1977 TV show!) and arranges to speak to her on the phone.
Poussard describes the essence of the conversation with Véronique Dreux, formerly Madame Trogneux, now Madame de la Simone, which lasted about thirty minutes:
“Listen sir, I have been divorced from Jean-Michel Trogneux for many years. Listen sir, I have remarried and my children are here, I don’t want any problems. But I can tell you that Jean-Michel is not Brigitte; that’s ridiculous.” (…)
I take her at her word and ask her of photos of her shared past with Jean-Michel Trogneux, promising, if they are conclusive, to close the case without even publishing them.
“Brigitte told me not to get involved. I don’t want any trouble about my children, or about uh… it’s not relevant to the family anymore.”
As I argue she should hold Brigitte Macron to account, because it’s because of her silence that her own photo, as well as those of her children (Jean-Jacques in particular) are circulating on social networks, she cuts me off and inexplicably blurts out: “… and also I know Macron’s father…. Well, I don’t know him very well. He was a surgeon at the Amiens hospital. But I didn’t even know Macron. We lived in Toulon, I didn’t even know him. I saw him at my daughter’s wedding. First time I’d ever seen him.”
I can hear another person in the line. Véronique Dreux stops, visibly embarrassed, as if she’s gone too far. She pulls herself together and asks me: “Well, and what is your name?”
The whale dives down again, the oasis has once more proved to be a mirage. I can well imagine that Poussard has been driven to madness by repeating frustrating scenes of this kind.
Now he has no choice but to stick to this story if he wants to keep face. Likewise Candace Owens, who has now stuck her neck out as far as possible, including in a full-throated tweet in which she staked her “entire professional reputation” on the claim that Brigitte Macron “is in fact a man.”
She added: “Any journalist or publication that is trying to dismiss this plausibility is immediately identifiable as establishment.”
Well, that would probably expose me as a stooge of “the elites” too.
Martin Lichtmesz is on Substack. Be sure to follow him and subscribe!
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
If Brigitte Macron is not a man, why would she wear her watch like this?
could be a poison red herring, fed to candace, to destroy her reputation and credibility on all other subjects she covers.
Why does all this feel Birther-gate redux? With a new war — possibly a new world war — in the offing, why are so many conservatives so obsessed with unimportant stuff like this?
Great plastic surgery, but hmmm that chin looks suspicious.
Since politicians and bureaucrats lie about everything the only way to know is anatomical inspection or DNA testing. Maybe Bridge is intersex and changes gender style every thirty years out of boredom. The author might do well to investigate and perhaps meet in person some of the confirmed MTF (male to female) celebrities to learn what is possible. This includes pageant queens, lady boys and others closer to controversy. The number of people dedicated to doing the makeover of these people is disturbing and this is apparently a substantial niche industry. Equally interesting, people who like to point out MTF trannies claim it is often difficult to spot FTM trannies who took hormones before adulthood (yes such people exist).
The details of Brigitte are less important than the overall issue.
Didn’t that Pepe guy write an article about this a few weeks ago?
Bigger question should be “Do white men in the West have any balls?”
Take Lindsey Graham. Or even Donald Trump who talks big but is a total wussy before the very Jews who did lawfare on him.
If Brigitte is a man, white guys in the West are all girls.
BanksterPedoJews
No matter what sex or gender (married with two kids) Brigitte was is or wants to be, he/she/it was 39 when it seduced 14 YO Emmanuel.
Twenty five years senior teacher and a young teen is icky to say the least.
Quelle est la différence entre Brigette et un lévrier, un lévrier attend que les lièvres apparaissent.
The French…
Candace wasn’t the first, it was doing the rounds in France way before anybody outside France noticed.
WHO CARES? Speaking as a citizen of France, what I care about is that her husband, micron, is a mass murderer (for prohibiting effective treatments and imposing a bioweapon shot during Covid, not to mention the Ukraine war and his part in it) and a traitor (his treasonous actions would be too long to list here) and deserves ten times the death penalty. That’s all the French people should care about.
Who cares?! She/he/they is attractive neither as male nor female.
One should use the proper title to address the President of The Republic, namely Lady Macron
This falls under the category of purposeful gas-lighting.
Possibly true but guaranteed to immediately make normies suspicious of everything else you say.
So who fucking cares.
And don’t say, “well most of europe cares”
People don’t care about this crap until a tranny rapes their 9 year old daughter in a public bathroom.
Then when they’re being investigagged by the FBI for being “transphobic”, you can point to this and their other normie neighbors STILL won’t fucking care.
It’s just not worth the effort. Unless it’s a small part of a larger pastiche, a tapestry, as a single item it’s just noise.
Work this info into say, the Galton-Darwin-Huxley stuff, Alan Watt for example and his research on the eventual androgenous future of humanity planned possibly centuries ago, but by itself it’s not going to convince anyone of anything constructive.
Time to settle this once and for all. Kick her in the nuts!
Video Link
Since politicians and bureaucrats lie about everything the only way to know is anatomical inspection or DNA testing.
****************************************************************
Won’t prove a thing. The experts will say what they are paid to say.
That’s a dumb question or you were joking anyway. Yawn…
The investigation into Mrs. Macron is focused on the wrong subject. Instead, Candace Owens should be investigated to determine if she is indeed female. Owens is not and never has been female; he was born male and remains male today. As a teenager, Candice changed his name to Candace and continues to live as a female. Many of Candace primary school friends have spoken out.
Those are not male hands.
“When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger” – Confucius.
The theory is believable to most people because it appears quite obvious visually that Brigitte Macron has never been more than 3 months pregnant. A tiny frame like that has huge hip spread during pregnancy, as there is no other way to accommodate a 6 lb or more child with all the fluid needed. She has no hips, whatsoever. She does not appear as a woman that has even been through puberty.
Then there are the awful wigs. Real women get flattering cuts or extensions to deal with thinning hair. Wigs are for drag queens and Halloween.
Then there is the predatory behavior of Brigitte the child molester. The overwhelming abuse of adolescents comes from men. There is a tiny percent of women who engage in such behavior, but their victims almost always reject them after a while. Even Villi Fallou finally rejected Mary Kay Laturno.
Then there is the fact that her bio has huge swaths of missing time and information. She doesn’t seem at all like a real person.
Then there is the fact that she lied about a photo of a teacher at one of her schools being mystery man Auziere, which was proven a lie.
Then there is Auziere’s bizarre death and lack of proof he ever existed.
Then there is the fact that Emmanuel comes off like a total queer.
So maybe she is not a man. Maybe she is his deep state handler. No matter what you say, their “love” story is too full of holes and lies to be true. So it is false. Calling her a man is the most fun and effective way to point out that they are both phonies, liars, plants, actors and biographical fictions- much more so, even, than the average politician.
A big boring pile of “who cares”….
How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
Believers believe what they want to believe and no amount of evidence can change their beliefs. I said earlier that I found the story entertaining but the best jokes are short jokes and this one has become tediously long.
Now seriously, would ascertaining that Brigitte is a tranny stop Macron from advancing the destructive globalist agenda? Therefore what is the purpose of wasting time and energy on trying to prove something – that in the absolute is a triviality – without having the means to acquire the only conclusive hard evidence that could prove it beyond doubt, if it were true, because only the Macron themselves could provide it but they won’t.
As for why Macron or Brigitte won’t provide that conclusive evidence to prove the conspiracists wrong, why would they stop their opponents from making idiots out of themselves? As far as Macron and his handlers are concerned, the “Brigitte is a man” theory is the perfect red herring. While the hoi polloi are busy fixated on trivialities, they are free to destroy France.
Where was their obviously fake romance for the twenty whole years from the time Emmanuel was first molested in 1987 until their marriage in 2007?
She was married to a man who no one has a recent photo of and nobody besides Brigitte knew at all. And where was Manny? Once they decided to let Brigitte work it out with fake person Auziere, why didn’t Emmanuel marry a normal, visually female woman his own age and have a couple of kids? It is not human nature to behave in the ways they claim they have lived their lives.
Brigitte is not attractive. Despite the media gaslighting that she is beautiful, she looks equal parts old man and old hag. She looks like Little Jimmy Dickens in a ten gallon wig instead of a ten gallon hat. No one would stay single and lonely for twenty years pining for Mr Magoo: Trans Edition.
Someone did, but I don’t think it was Pepe Escobar, if that is to whom you are referring.
As I recall, that author wasn’t impressed or convinced by Poussard’s book either and wondered why Poussard even bothered to publish something that proved ultimately nothing.
Ron Unz covered the story in his article from September 2nd of last year. He was also unimpressed with the story itself and surprised that Candace Owens took the bait the way she did, possibly making herself a “useful idiot” and hurting the causes of others dealing with more important controversial issues than this.
At any rate, something smells rotten in Paris and it’s not the Seine.
Yes, much more effective than simply banning her from YouTube. Indeed, any ‘alternative’ journalist to be found on that site is plainly tolerated for a reason – including our chum Tucker.
She looks a lot better than Big Mike that’s for sure. I’d say Macron got the better deal even if the surgically unaltered parts might look a bit rough.
The bulge is pretty feminine, too.
I will just add the following to my previous comment. Brigitte’s “gender” is a non-issue but the age differential is a huge issue. A guy who marries his teacher who is a full generation older than him definitely has mental problems and as such is definitely totally unfit to rule even a village, let alone a country like France.
Instead of sterile discussions about the content of Brigitte’s panties, the French should have pondered over the real elephants in the room, like the aforesaid age differential or the obvious signs that Macron is a user of psychoactive substances, before they elected him the first time.
Who do you think has the bigger “King Cobra in the Pants” (to quote Alex)? Big Mike or Big Bridge? Everyone will obviously guess Big Mike. But, I don’t know. That Big Bridge could be a sleeper.
Re
Are you not aware of the massive wave of news stories about female teachers being criminally charged, convicted and sentenced for sexual relations with very young male adolescents they shamelessly pursued and seduced?
Or is it that you are arguing, as many suggest, that this is not really so much ‘abuse’ in that young boys are not so deeply harmed by seduction by older women, but rather have a good time and then shrug their shoulders about it … tho perhaps traumatised and horrified only by seeing the sexually providing teacher jailed and having her life destroyed
On 4chan /pol/ when these stories are posted, young men add tags such as ‘the daily nice’ and comments such as ‘I wish that had been me’
In one case a father of a teen boy was prosecuted because he learned about his lad having sex with a female teacher, but laughed it off and made an understandable parental decision to just ‘keep it private’
There are many T people on the world stage. Some openly admit it, otherwise there is no final proof. A strong indication is the “Q angle”, the angle of the femur bone. It’s forcing real women to get down stairs in a particular way. It reveals FTMs when walking. No names from me, and I don’t care about French politics. I just wanted to note, the actress or singer you adore may has a secret.
Is the theory a spin on this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M._Butterfly_(film)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Boursicot#Relationship_with_Shi
Hmmm that bulge in his/her nether region looks a bit suspicious. 🤔
far fetched?
or
Gaza genocide?
This is the third article on UR about Candace Owens’ treatment of the Macrons and not one covering her “Liberty” Piece. Too bad.
“could be a poison red herring, fed to candace, to destroy her reputation and credibility on all other subjects she covers.”
What does it say about her intelligence that she eagerly accepts this feed?
Not again!! Why? The ongoing genocide in Gaza is not exciting enough?
Nothing is more hypocritical than writing a lengthy critique of this clickbait garbage than using it yourself to attract “clicks” to your substack column.
“Martin Lichtmesz is on Substack. Be sure to follow him and subscribe!”
Thanks for the warning, Ron. I’ll be sure to avoid stepping in the lichtmess. Couldn’t you post a short warning rather than the whole thing?
More to the point, does a writer whose name translates to Martin Lightsabre, have any credence?
DR, TL
zzz
Who cares?
This is irrelevant gossip at best.
One thing is certain – Macron (to quote Zappa) – takes “meat in the seat”.
You only need to look at the overtly homo-erotic hug-fest that Macron is having with those anti-white gangsta jungle-bunnies on st Martin and you can just tell that Emmanuel wants to be assaulted, arse-raped and pissed on, he ain’t fooling anyone.
What a total cuckold fag-bitch!
Photoshopped. Her left hand is clearly in the focus plane while her right is behind it, and farther behind than the “bulge” while being sharper. The bulge’s sharpness is about the same as that of the people in the background. Impossible.
People who hadn’t noticed that Joe Biden was a vegetable are getting excited about Mme Micron.
Say it ain’t so!
Bridgett Macron IS A CHILD MOLESTER! Whether she’s a man or not is based on speculation, while deflecting the FACT that this THING, betrayed her marriage, and three children, to begin an ILLEGAL and IMMORAL relationship with one of her 15 year old students.
END OF STORY.
STOP ALLOWING JEWS TO DEFLECT REALITY WITH STRAWMEN!
The Tribe have convinced Old McDonad to start clamping down on anti-smitique speech. He has also started to kick out the disobedient, revolutionaries, rebels, real and alleged criminals, sending them to cosy cells in El Salvador.
As a result of these initiatives, I notice that RU has started to drift away from sensitive issues. And so, we are once again back to whether Mrs Macron is hung or whether she has an enlarged clit.
I personally dont care if she is an albino Mandingo in disguise rocking a monster club. Whether a man, woman or something in between, this is something for Emmanuel to deal with. I am sure that the other purveyors, degenerates and perverts on this site have better things to do other than obsess with a couple cavorting 4 thousand miles away.
As for being older let me say that older women, even those who could have been your mother, give great head and are grateful when you ransack them. They dont get much and are happy to crack a nut when they can especially if its a regular thing.
I get the feeling that writers going on and on with this drivel, are envious. Perhaps they should head to Paris, and if they they are so inclined, get some in the back hatch LMAO.
In the meantime, all this earth shattering news flash aside, can we get some articles that are relevant to the world situation.
I do not know what Emmanuel and Brigitte do in bed or whether they ever share a bed. I do not know whether she ever seduced Emmanuel. But I believe that their love story and their persona have been crafted to put strange people in a prominent position who would usher a new world order, where there are no distinctions between men and women, the young and the old. The Macrons have been put there to normalize relationships with trannies and with children. And for playing that role, they have been rewarded.
I find more bizarre the author’s assertion that Macron looks ‘a little bit’ like Alain Delon.
Perhaps, but then one would need to believe her stupid and naive. Not much evidence in support of that.
We care about micron, the rothchild banker, the USian lackey who helped destroy France with unmitigated cultural “enrichment” from those wonderful “immigrants”………..
You are likely confused because I posted a comment on the thing on a Pepe article thread last year (July perhaps).
My comment at the link below is likely the first mention of it on this site.
https://www.unz.com/jfreud/the-mothman-prophecies-as-a-christmas-movie/#comment-6353292
Most USians are sheep. They enjoy their “country” and truly “want” what it has to offer.
Work till ya die. Get sick, pay those bills with hard, hard work to the for profit “health” “care”; lotsa Taxes for endless war and USian sluts.
Who gives a fuck! As long Macroon wants to ride it and as long as IT consents to be ridden, then ride on into the sunset. Hooray!
Why not simply look at her feet while she’s standing up? They always seem perfectly parallel.
That thing is aging worse than an Anglosaxon,.-WASP.
Aging like milk. Typical USian -like.
This is the third recent Unz article about Brigitte. All three come to the same conclusion: “Move along, nothing to see here.” Maybe they’re following the Pizzagate psyop script here:
1. A shocking practice of the elite (pedocannibalism) is discovered.
2. The elites “get ahead of the story” by scripting a limited hangout version of it.
3. The pre-spun story is then repeated in the mainstream media in a way which makes everyone who believes in it look completely retarded.
4. The story is closed with another scripted psyop (the fake shooter who supposedly shot up Comet Ping Pong). Now anyone who ever believed in it is basically a potential terrorist.
Result, the public has been permanently vaccinated against seeing that in fact, ALL elites in both parties are Satanists who degeneracy goes far beyond what the average goy from the hinterlands can imagine.
Something similar is probably happening here. The scripted twist will be something like: Brigitte “proves” she’s a woman, making everyone who claimed to their friends over Thanksgiving dinner that Brigitte is a man with bugged-out eyes will never be taken seriously again.
I think that too many people were beginning to figure out that yes, they are ALL trannies, Brigitte and Big Mike of course, but also Ivanka, Melania, and even Martha freaking Washington. Brigitte and Emmanuel were given the honor of starring in this new script, which will succeed just as the Pizzagate script (yes, they all f*ck kids and drink their blood).
Or of this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simone_de_Beauvoir
Allegations of sexual abuse
Beauvoir was bisexual, and her relationships with young women were controversial.[41] French author Bianca Lamblin (originally Bianca Bienenfeld) wrote in her book Mémoires d’une jeune fille dérangée (Memoirs of a deranged girl, published in English under the title A Disgraceful Affair) that, while a student at Lycée Molière, she was sexually exploited by her teacher Beauvoir, who was in her 30s.[42] Sartre and Beauvoir both groomed and sexually abused Lamblin.[43] Bianca wrote her Mémoires in response to the posthumous 1990 publication of Jean-Paul Sartre’s Lettres au Castor et à quelques autres: 1926-1963 (Letters to Castor and other friends), in which she noted that she was referred to by the pseudonym Louise Védrine.[44]
In 1943, Beauvoir was suspended again from her teaching position when she was accused of seducing her 17-year-old lycée pupil Natalie Sorokine in 1939.[45] Sorokine’s parents laid formal charges against Beauvoir for debauching a minor (the age of consent in France at the time was 13 until 1945, when it became 15)[46][47] and Beauvoir’s licence to teach in France was revoked, although it was subsequently reinstated.[4
Ms. Owens is not impressive but those on the right are always acting like members of The Tea Party; “ I’m not racist, I like Ben Carson.”
Even though this is fake news it is still legitimate to call Macron a Sissy
Agree. Also, as of the last few days, if the sudden recent prominence of the ‘Brigitte’-Emmanuel thing is meant to camouflage anything other than their perverse and illegal relationship and Micron’s own perversity, it is a very recent political move.
Marine Le Pen has just been subjected to a very evil political manouevre. Like any party with a few or more members in the farcical and powerless European Parliament, her party had used some staff members there to do work in the home country on occasion.
Now, she has a four-year sentence, two under home arrest, with a degradlng electronic tracking anklet, two suspended, but more importantly, a five-year ban on seeking office.
In a country of 350 million, the handful stories about older women seducing teenagers are a drop in the bucket. These stories are pushed in order to soften the extremely high number of older homosexual men who prey on teenaged boys. I live in NY, why does the local paper give me stories about a 25 year old female in Texas messing around with a 17 year old? Meanwhile, the local stories of male teachers and others are never covered? The owners of America, and the rest of the West, in large numbers, have become complete degenerates and are pushing their illness on the masses.
No, not Pepe. It was this article by Laurent Guyenot.
https://www.unz.com/article/brigittology-for-dummies/
I only skimmed through this new article and it appears to be very similar to that of LG. There was no point in repeating.
I agree, have mentioned this a few times here.
Also to add, as also stated before, de Bovine ran a propaganda programme on official radio in the occupied part of France. Not, in itself, a terrible thing, but the later hypocrisy and constant perversions certainly were.
Of course, it’s abuse. No one sane would argue that.
However, the below remains. Your info does not disprove that reality. It only means you don’t know how bad it is.
Can’t you juggle, chew gum and walk at the same time? No one is ever going to do a thing about Gaza. Ever. It’s like obsessing about the wars in the Comgo. The world has decided to look the other way, so that’s the end of it. Other Moslem nations, neighbors even, don’t care. Where is Egypt, Turkey, Jordon? Hezbollah looks like it’s been destroyed, the Saudis are still trying to beat the Houthi with American bombs and the Iranians are building deeper bomb shelters. The Palestinians, like the Kurds and the Alawites, are screwed.
Brigitte is a dude
Big Mike is a dude
Chelsea Clinton is not Bill’s biological child (Web Hubbell was)
The Obama’s kids are not their biological children
Prince Harry and Megan’s kids are not her biological children
Tim Walz is not a straight dude
Notice how all this fraud and deception is exclusively a leftie thing?
Macron gives me the gay vibe too. The wife seems more like a professional fixer for the gay Macron. The rest seems like a distraction, which was probably been blessed by the likes of globalist Attali. France has been plagued with protests during little Emmanuel’s reign. Sprinkle a little salaciousness like the Madam is a man. Voila! The protests are no more, while LePen gets convicted. Gossip still works, and Candace is now doing important work of dissecting Blake Lively.
…And why would she wear her snatch like that…. and why would she wear her fingertips down to her knees?
You’re getting warm, Old Sport!
Video Link
Unlikely. Here’s the source. It doesn’t appear to be the kind of website that photoshops random photos of Brigitte to give her a penis.
https://www.purepeople.com/article/brigitte-macron-rires-complices-avec-emmanuel-pour-son-grand-retour-a-l-elysee_a348617/1
Do 72 year olds generally make your we-we-worm get warm?
That thing is hotter than USian Big Mike. LOL.
Video Link
The author’s suggestion/assertion that E.Macron looks “a little bit” like the gorgeous Alain Delon is indeed bizarre.
The author wrote, “[Macron] has a certain narcissistic, suspiciously homosexual aura about him.” Really? Gay as Obama, as anyone with a functioning Gaydar system can see. The super gayness of Macron makes the Brigitte/Butch story more plausible.
No matter what you say, their “love” story is too full of holes and lies to be true. So it is false.
Sacre bleu, what nonsense you speak! Just observe the Macrons at home:
Video Link
Well, despite everything, that is something of an interesting bulge. Much like Michelle Obama showing the same type of “bulge” on the famous Ellen show dancing scene.
Would like to see some sort of believable explanation from the Brigiette and Michelle apologists.
Yeah kinda weird. Delon was a stunner. Maybe because they’re both french he made the analogy. Come to think of it if there’s a film star Macron resembles(and I do admit he looks smart for a politician) it’s fellow frenchman Jean Paul Belmondo
Do you have notions of photography? There’s something called focal plane, there’s something called aperture and there’s something called depth of field, which is determined by aperture and the distance of the focal plane from the lens. You cannot have two focal planes, you have one and before it, the picture progressively sharpens, behind it the picture progressively blurs. You cannot have a sharp picture in the left hand’s plane, a less sharp picture in the bulge’s plane and then a sharper picture again in the right hand’s plane. As a matter of fact, if you pay attention, you’ll notice that the picture has greater detail resolution above the waist than below. It’s a fake.
I did not make it all the way through the article that Monsieur Lichtmesz posted here for April 1st.
However, I think he may not have mentioned the newest wrinkle to the story, which is the theory that Jean-Michel Trogneux was involved with or married to a second woman, and with this woman he fathered a child named Emmanuel Macron. It was some years later that Jean-Michel became Brigitte, and you already know the magical, fairytale ending.
Notice that the bulge is there only on the first photo and that it is much less visible on the following ones and that photos nr. 9 and forth have no bulge and show a pelvis that looks closer to 120° than 90.
Given that your racial cousins are virtually always the ones raping old nuns, old ladies in their homes, and old or disabled women in nursing homes, you should prolly tread carefully here….
He doesn’t resemble him, he’s trying to mimic him like Sarkozy did before him b/c French men liked to identify with Belmondo, much more than with Delon.
We are living in a world where a lot of people are desperate for fame, audience, or just momentary attention. Why is it anybody’s business whatever she is!!!
If Brigitte is a man, then, as a taxi driver once told me all the good looking guys are gays, or transgenders.
Dude, you just called yourself an imbecile.
Are all these WEF Weasels upside down? Maybe that’s the root cause of all the stupidity we are encountering at the moment. Trudeau, Obama, Klaus etc etc.
He does, but only if you look at their photos with your eyes closed.
True
Surely that’s Fred A. Leuchter jr ….?
How did you get “sabre” from “-mesz”? Knife, maybe, but Sabre in German is Säbel.
Besides, do you know anything about Martin Lichtmesz? Have you read any of his books or other writings to question his credibility?
“Facts, Gil, the facts!”
You are all jealous of true love. It is so rare to find. Maybe one in ten thousand ever find true love.
The bonus is to find it with someone so incredibly beautiful.
I honestly would break my dick off in this woman….the smoldering good looks…the sweaty, skinny leg passion unleashed in private…the demur civility in public. She looks like an elegant mink.
“Silent Waters run Deep”:
My God …what a catch:
i vouch for neither her intelligence or credibility. i find it interesting that she has shone the greatest light yet, on the memory holed subject, of the attack on the u.s.s. liberty. if she is dragged through the mud on this, then the zionists call call into question, the veracity of her rightful accusations, of israel’s premeditated murder of u.s. sailors.
I would so do her, and I’m not being sarcastic like you. Maybe you need your T levels checked.
My cousins might be, I ain’t. I don’t think most of you are attracted to senior citizens either, but this gentleman apparently is.
To each his own.
See how that works?
LMAO!
I believe the word you are searching for in this instance is “minx”, but maybe mink works too.
Yeah, man…if you say so…You wrote a very long article to convince us that that sexual predator is NOT a man ( pedophile ), but at the worst, a ‘ cougar ‘. Sure, I expect from you in another very long article that Micro-Napoleon is NOT a homosexual ( and that negro from that picture with two Africans on the sides of the Presidente of France is a liar when he is saying that his cousin or brother – which died recently of AIDS, didn’t have a sexual relationship with El Presidente of France ). Oh, to not forget about Big Mike ( aka Michael Robinson )…is he, I mean ‘ she ‘ also a woman, right ?! Of course, when Barak said ‘ Michael and I…”, it was just a mistake/typo, isn’t?! If so, let me tell you something: I’m married with my college sweetheart for 37 years and I never called her Marian, but her birth name ( Mariana ). Ask any married man, from any part of the World, IF he have called his wife/girlfriend with the variant of male name, instead of the real feminine first name. Oh, and do not forget that Epstein was just a bored billionaire which didn’t blackmailed anyone and was accused wrong and committed suicide ( or ‘ natural assisted death ‘, how I call/mock those ‘ suicides ‘). And Bill ( the one which didn’t have sex with Monica ) in that blue gown and red (woman) shoes on Epstein Island was/is just an imagination – do not believe your own eyes, just what the presstitutes are telling you/us. PS: please do not forget to explain as an accident the death of actress Joan Rivers, short after that street interview ( ‘ Michelle is a tranny ‘ ).
Martin Lichtmesz how much money you got for this rubbish . Don’t try to belittle others for their honest views. Are you trying to reconcile homosexual deviants with straight people.
If you are a man you don’t need thousands of words to prove B. is homosexual man and full stop, just like most of them who were chosen to be politicians.Don’t tell me you didn’t know about that.
first was Unz , than Guyenot, now it is you, writing against Candance Owens.
not necessarily, just look at pepe escobar, being fed the story of the israeli f-35 carry a nuclear missile to attack iran, being shot down by the russians. now i still believe this to be true, because it’s such a delicious thought, i just can’t let it go. apparently pepe as well and he reported the story promising more proof later, that unfortunately never came.
apparently pepe had been set up by one of his trusted sources. pepe is no dummy but his credibility took a bit of a hit, rightfully or not. another option is she is doing exactly what she was paid to do, look at her origin, check into that. now she had a big split up, with ben shapiro but her past work with maga and the white lives matter episode with ye (or what ever name he’s using now), that led him to his defcon 3 career meltdown, are all suspicious to me.
but what do i know though, i’m just a conspiracy theorist.
Well, for people like me, a taxpayer, living for the last 30 years in USA, is very important to know the truth about our ‘ leaders ‘ and to understand WHY they are sending our hard-earned money to Ukraine, Israel, Egypt, etc. WHY they send our boys and girls to bleed on the foreign lands and start wars in the Middle East for that entity named Israel. Based on your stupid question, I care IF our President could be blackmailed and act in the interest of a clique, instead of ” WE, THE PEOPLE “. If you think like a sheeple, it’s your business, but please don’t ask the others to be braindead followers and to not pay attention at what really happens around us. Capisce, amigo ?!
Of course Brigitte is a man, this has been proven beyond any doubt: http://pressibus.free.fr/gen/trogneux/indexgb.html. Martin knew this investigation but decided not to mention it.
Martin has made two simple mistakes: he assumes there is proof Jean-Michel still exists (nope), and he assumes the 1977 interview with transgender “Veronique” (=Brigitte) means Jean-Michel couldn’t have fathered any additional children (nope). With this, his entire argument breaks down.
The Macrons could easily refute the transgender evidence by presenting some photos of Brigitte as a teenager or pregnant wife, or by providing an interview with Jean-Michel. But this will never happen, because Brigitte obviously IS Jean-Michel: they have the exact same face and ears.
The chubby guy has very different ears and never even claimed to be Jean-Michel.
Also, remember Brigitte invited transgender dancers to the presidential palace, chose transgender dancers for the Olympic Games opening ceremony, and wanted the renovated Notre-Dame cathedral to look like a phallus. No real woman ever would do this.
The case is closed. A few people (including Ron, Laurent and Martin) remain in denial, but it really doesn’t matter.
Intelligence agencies could easily change someone’s identity and destroy/produce the proper documentation. I don’t see it as a strong rebuttal that there are documents missing.
The story of the Macrons is very strange. It has all the markers of French intelligence/Gnostic pedophilic network. Anneke Lucas talks about the prevalence of this in Europe.
Also, the facial recognition software is powerful and can account for face-lifts.
Xavier Poussyhard cant Win…
My bet
Emanuel is closeted gay or bi (my fagdar impression).
But Briggite has not baguette.
“So there are two Brigittes in this mysterious family saga, a real one (Trogneux), who has died; and a false one (Macron)”
So jews are the “trans” who are stealing the identity of not yet but soon deceased White Race. I see.
The stories of female teachers seducing male students are deliberately elevated in the media as a form of gaslighting.
Any post-pubescent boy would be delighted to have sex with a pretty twenty- or thirty-something teacher. This is not abuse — maybe a mild abuse of authority, but come on, teachers are barely authority figures. It’s not like we’re taking about prison guards.
In fact, most of these teachers are atomized, hypersexualized mentally ill sluts. If anything the alpha guys are taking advantage of them a lot of the time.
This is the media claiming that male and female sexuality are the same, just another anti-male blank-slate salvo.
LOL, Have mercy, you will break her hips at her age! She may be a vixen GMILF though.
I read a few paragraphs then stopped, that was enough for me, there are things more important to me to think about.
Brigitte is , of course, a man. Macron is a pure product of MK-Ultra or, if you prefer, of Stavistock. He has been programmed with chemicals, sexual abuses, hypnosis and presumably torture, in order to create multiple personalities that are unaware of each other. He/she is his treating officer. He/she is the real president of France. He is a Rothschild creature. We have seen him sweating and excited with black men . The president of France!!! Jews are the masters of France . And R. is the ring that govern them all. Greed and messianism is their purpose.
LMFAO!!!!
Dude, I think maybe you need to write a book on how you developed that much T! You'll never have to work again.
Jean- Paul Belmondo was an actor eqipped with much charm,a quality the clown E.Macron definitely doesn’t possess. But I agree that E.Macron looks smart for a politician.
You don’t get it. It’s not normal. The abyss is endless, but it starts as a small crack.
I think you just lessened your own case, Old Sport.
Onan …
Lichtmeß (Praesentatio Iesu) is a Catholic holiday (2. February) –
from “Mass”, not “knife”.
I think that this whole Brigitte Macron affair is just a red herring being used to send the alternative media down many rabbit holes. It is weird however, how the Macrons and the French government have sued and fined people want to say that Brigitte Macron is a man. Why not just ignore it? By their actions, they’re just throwing gasoline on the fire.
StopitStopitStopitStopitSTOPIT!
Man, woman, Male-to-Female trans or Female-to-male trans, trans this or trans that, what difference does it make. Most of EU is ruled by morons, dolts, scumbags, and sexual curiosities. I would be more interested in knowing Macron’s IQ than his or his partner’s sex. Better that he spend time screwing him, her, it, or whatever object he fancies rather than screwing France.
Unfortunately, not much. She’s been sold a bill of goods.
are you attracted to corpses? if so, you may be a necrophiliac, we here at n.a. (necrophiliacs anonymous) are here to help you. when you complete our 12 step program, you will be given a mortuary assistants license, to help start you in your new career, in the exciting field of mortuary science. career placement help available.
Eeee Gawd, where did you get these photos fit for a freak show? The photo with him/her/it baring teeth looks like that of a Chimpanzee having fun!
My apologies to Pepe and thanks to Swords, Che and Mike for the corrections. One lingering question, will there be a third article about this freak?
I have never seen a horizontal smile line like that under the nose.
I’ve seen so many articles etc on Brigitte Macron possibly being a man/trans/whatever. Just wondering why there hasn’t been any focus on Michelle Obama being in the same or similar position?
Is it too hot? Joan Rivers spilled the beans just before her death.
This is what happens when you avoid to talk about the lovely chosen ones…
Who cares what was the original gender of Macron’s wife? And why would it matter?
It does matter because why are they all trannies? What do I mean by all? I mean all. All the way back to “Mrs.” Washington. We have had a president married to the son of Crowley and thus also a president that is the grandson of Crowley. Why? This matters because what else could matter than that they are evil occultists killing us for religious reasons. Focusing on “the issues” won’t change anything. We can stop them by drastic means or continue to be sacrificed to their evil gods.
Poop-pay Escobar is thoroughly discredited. Never seen someone talk so endlessly with zero insights offered. Same thing with Scrotum Ritter. He is thoroughly discredited.
We can solve all of these problems in one go. Poop-pay should marry Big Mike. And, Scrotum Ritter should marry Big Bridge. Then O-bomb-ya and Macaroni can finally wed in a big ol’ grand gay wedding.
Watch’yall’think?
I agree with the 2 focal planes, but there’s also something referred to as a ‘Landscape’ setting that has a ‘Wide DOF,’ where both fore- and background are crisp and sharp in focus.
DOF = Depth Of Field
The “raping young boys” title is wrong. A boy is zero to 17 years old. The boys in the story are at the “old” end of that range. These are teenagers, not little boys. Ditto for teenage girls.
Good deconstruction of this enormous red herring of a “news story.”
I have one quibble with the article, however: Emmanuel Macron doesn’t look remotely like the once stunningly handsome Alain Delon. Macron has a creepy long nose a la Cyrano de Bergerac, small teeth with too much space between them, and cold, calculating, cowardly eyes that are a bit too close together. I can easily imagine him as a debauched 18th-century aristocrat in a white wig, exactly the kind slated for the guillotine. He’s the type who would snivel and whimper if confronted with real force.
Delon had class, style, and boyish charm. His face was harmoniously proportioned, with a small nose, seductive blue eyes (his only common feature with Macron) and a shy smile. He could of course turn that face into the cold mask of a killer for the silver screen, but that’s because he was a great actor. Macron’s murderous mask is his real face.
Delon also had friends in the Marseille mafia, but nobody’s perfect. Compared to Macron’s friends in the globalist financial mafia, Alain’s gangster buddies were little more than sandbox playmates.
“Emmanuel Macron (born 1977) is a handsome, relatively young man who looks a bit like Alain Delon.” And Paul Newman.
Anytime.
If there is, hope it will be about the person or persons behind this whole spectacle and the intent, and not the sideshow distraction itself.
However far-fetched it may sound, it is currently doing the rounds . . .
So, let’s see. If someone with no aparent expertise in evidence evaluation asserts, in lieu of argument, that something is far-fetched, that ends the discussion, right? Imagine going before a court and demanding that evidence be dismissed on the merely asserted grounds that it’s far-fetched. Sure, OK. The atomic theory, plate tectonics, blood circulation, etc, etc, were considered far-fetched because the evidence was dismissed as incompatible with some pre-conceived notion.
In this case the assumption is that Mr. and Mr. Macron aren’t amoral freaks whose placement in office is a purely occult expression of supernatural demonism breaking out in human affairs. But, no worries there, because the same people who support the Macrons believe there is no supernatural realm of evil in the first place, in the same way fish apparently have no comprehension of living in water. Yet, how about those demonic Olympics or the opening to the tunnel? Lubavitchers in Brooklyn with subterranean chambers of horrors Nothing to see there, just fun pretending to be supernatural evil.
Now that is something that would be interesting. Perhaps some clever writer will read your comment.
To be fair – older birds give great blowies! (Please decipher my aussie-english colloquialism. Lol
See Emmanuelle hugging and kissing Z like his long lost lover Trudeau.
Even Z being a flamboyant actor was embarrassed.
The evidence Big Mike is a man is much much stronger and that is what america should be talking about. Brigitte is around 5’5″ and slender. She has a female height and weight while Big Mike is 6 feet and bigboned. Probably 190 and not fat. Mike is very coarse-featured too. Nothing feminine about him.
not a smile but a pout, not even a sneer.
JR death or murder? Her dauaghter got a huge huge settlement.
joan didnt like mel g—‘anti semite’. I met mel once…seemed ok.
I’ve always wondered what does the human “animal” look like. Is it ever possible to look at another human being and see them as an animal; the human animal. I’ve never been able to, until now; that picture; the teeth, the wig that does not go with the face, or something. Is that, ironically, the effect of cosmetic surgery? I feel sorry for her.
Delon became a big white nationalist/front national supporter. The yids tried to control him via lucrative movie contracts but he politely declined and chose his own assignments – it’s always the same story: the ugly yids always try to coopt gentile beauty to their nefarious agendas.
What about one 6’2, 170?
Video Link
But really the daughter getting a settlement???Shut the wee bitch up? Oh of course she would have been anti-Mel Gibson. To people like Joan (as good as she was on certain things) saw a Nazi under the matttress wherever she went – like a good American Jewess of her age group.
As so many people have complained about this comparison, just let me say that I merely wrote “a bit”, at least I have a vibe somewhat into that direction. Of course nobody matches Delon who looked like a living God, and also seems to have been a rather based gentleman.
The “landscape” setting has the focal plane set at the most distant object and aperture set at minimum. Everything before the most distant object is sharp and nothing behind is blurred because there is nothing behind. Those photos obviously weren’t shot in “landscape” mode.
PS: afaic, I use my cameras in aperture priority and manual modes.
Did I? The watch is not only an irrelevant detail, the assertion that only men wear it that way is ridiculous. I happen to know women who do also. So there’s the watch and there’s the overall silhouette with all its body parts, of which some perhaps aren’t fully natural, and without those that are figments of people’s imagination. Or did you perhaps recognise yourself in my comment and felt the urge to react?
Man that guy’s funny. They’re all trannies to him. But how do they get pregnant?
I can’t get why unz.com is so invested into disproving the Brigitte=Jean-Michel equation.
If that was false it would be ridiculously easy to debunk it. Since there is not even an attempt to debunk it, we can assume it is true.
If I never wanted to work again, I would just get melanin injections and pretend to be a black man.
No offense. ;-D
Quiet, perv. Would-be comedians on here like you and @Truth bore the hell out of me.
I find it bizarre and sufficiently perverted to know that a 40, plus year old woman, a teacher, commenced a sexual affair with a boy 14 years old, one of her students and that this boy, this man, must clearly be riddled with a kind of mental illness, yet he is now running a country. You would think that with a background like that, he wouldn’t dare enter thepolitical arena. The French have given “liberalism” a whole new definition.
Video Link
What does “spergery” mean?
As I’ve explicated in the other article about this mess, yes, certainly there is something going on.
Since in these confused time, Ockham’s razor is being frowned upon, both sides (unfortunately the system is always pushing issues into two miserable bins) tend to come up with laughable claims. Neither is Macron’s wife a man, or his own uncle, or really Macron, who is really his wife or whatever. But there’s also too much smoke for there to be no fire. Way too much, obviously.
To make it short: The obvious explanation to all components of this french state cocktail of presidential grooming, lgbt, gilf fetish and secrecy is that Brigitte is a beard. Macron is a gay man who’s been handpicked by the money elite – let’s call them that.
Gays make fabulous media faces, they have “steady hands” as to the global agenda. With a woman at their side, they even resemble a heterosexual man and become very electable. Voters like handsome, presidential looking men. But they do not like gays too much.
At some point, Brigitte was approached by a secret service. They certainly ran a long list of potential candidates months or years before this day. But the stars align only so often. I guess it would be two or three friendly looking field agents, surely with a woman at their side, possibly also a priest or a rabbi. The group had a long friendly talk about some personal issues which could all be mended with moderate amounts of money. Finally, the friendly group asked Brigitte if she could do something important for her country.
It’s worth noting that the outcome was a win-win for everybody involved.
Brigitte probably had no illusions about finding another partner in her late 40s. It’s not hard to understand or not sympathize with the divorcee, who suddenly found herself in her own romantic movie. She would move to Élysée Palace, aid a fabulous, talented young man she certainly admired and helped shape up (at least in her mind) and say goodbye to her old, increasingly boring and pointless life. Instead of binging Netflix, she would help bring about her own personal beliefs, at least to a modest degree as a first lady.
I think some other commentor asked me here why they could not have chosen a younger, more believable partner. But such is the nature of a beard. Older is dependable. Imagine a younger lass getting frustrated with living a fake marriage and all this clandestine gay sex. Brigitte is perfectly alright with the way things are, she is deeply thankful. Her kids are taken care off, she lives the life of a queen.
All it took was a tiny lie Brigitte is more than willing to keep repeating.
My neighbor, Michelle Obama, disputes this. Big Mick says that no tranny could stay undetected under the intense scrutiny that a spouse of a world leader has to endure.
you say i’m a would-be comedian, when this is your idea of humor? pathetic chump, here let me show you how this is done.
do you work in a nursing home?
Might have worked pre-Civil Rights Act bro, Honkees have gotten sofitimicated since then.
I have it on good authority that now they grab a ruler and ask you to drop your trousers!
Big Mick doesn’t understand the PURE SCALE of the project.
Video Link
I think that “spergery” is used as a
What about JD Vance and his wife? They look more suspect than most of those shown in the video.
If you see a woman prominently displayed on TV, you are looking at a man. It’s as simple as that.
Video Link
It’s a man’s world at the top, eh? Despite all the feminism.
This is the Jewish photojournalist Martin cites to “debunk” the fact that Brigitte Macron is a man: https://twitter.com/moadabj. But of course, even this guy couldn’t get a photo or interview of Jean-Michel. And you know why? Because Brigitte is Jean-Michel. They have the *exact* same face and ears.
Brigitte Macron is a transgender woman who has undergone hormone therapy and feminization surgery (with a well-known doctor specialized in transgender surgery), and who wears a wig and fake tits. Unfortunately for him, his feet and beard stubble still prove he’s a man:
Any man who obsesses over this nonsense is a gay retard who fantasizes about sucking dick. It’s that simple.
And Candice Owens is a filthy nigger who should hang from the nearest oak tree.
This subject matter is interesting food for thought, but it is my assessment that the evidence is inconclusive. I would not place too much stock in what Candace Owens has to say about much of anything. She has the intellectual firepower of a 60 watt light bulb. And don’t even get me started on Tucker/Cucker.
What is indisputable is Mr. Macron is an extreme open borders globalist & a Rothschild butt boy to boot. I believe it is his personal destiny to be the metaphorical last nail in France’s coffin.
The so-called French “opposition” is an abject joke. Madame Le Pen has morphed into little more than a “CivNat” establishment Gaullist, & her chief second Mr. Bardella is half ethnic Algerian.
The Cote d’Azur (along with Switzerland) was arguably once the most beautiful area in the whole of Europe, if not the entire world. It has now become a highly polluted toxic waste site inundated with violent White-hating turd world savages. This is eerily analogous to our own border region from Brownsville, TX to Chula Vista, CA.
In summation, put a fork in France. It is finished. This is both heartbreaking & demoralizing.
That’s exactly it. Although Tom Cruise, and Denzel and Brad Pitt and all those little guys… yup, you guessed it.
Old Sport, are you still angry about that Train thing?
https://worldstarhiphop.com/videos/wshhFASr4y0VLh4KAri2/f-d-around-and-found-out-white-man-gets-knocked-out-into-a-coma-on-the-train-for-spewing-racist-remarks
auto-adjusted colors. Never saw such high-res photograph. I’d say the case is closed:
this is the original: static.cnews.fr/sites/default/files/000_1h75il_5d441c7097e59.jpg
This type of situation is making conservatives look ridiculous…
Many women, without undergoing any cosmetic procedure, also have facial hair…
Maybe that’s the 4D chess going on here. 👀
Can you provide some examples of a real women (without a genetic disorder) that have this type of clear male beard pattern (not just some “facial hair”)? I’ve discussed it with a doctor and he told me this is extremely rare in healthy women. At least you acknowledge it’s real. And it’s just one more piece of evidence, all supporting the transgender thesis.
These are two women, old and young, with substantial facial hair. Yet even they support the transgender theory: unlike “Brigitte”, they don’t have these big dark male beard stubble skin pores.
So those who believe “Brigitte” is a biological woman have to accept it’s a woman with a strong genetic or hormonal disorder, who wears a wig and fake tits, whose brother is missing, who likes transgender dancers and transgender art, who’s a pedophile, whose husband is gay, and so on.
Maybe the Earth is flat, too?
“Brigitte”:
I don’t know which doctor you spoke to to tell you this. I know there are an abnormal amount of doctors who are ignorant on a number of subjects. What I do know is that most women have a natural amount of hair on their bodies and faces. And that for aesthetic and natural reasons, most women remove their hair by waxing.
I’m not trans and I have opinions more aligned with the right on this topic.
So you cannot provide any examples, just as I thought. Yes, some women have facial hair, but they don’t have a male beard pattern like “Brigitte”.
We also know that Brigitte wears fake tits and is bald:
It is a distraction from micron being a rothchild usian-owned banker that helped further destroy France.
That is one plausible theory. But perhaps there is another.
I see this campaign as sort of a last-ditch effort to try and get rid of Macron. Within minutes of perusing one the “Brigitte is a man” websites I came to that conclusion. Because for sure in France there are many average citizens that want Macron out of there, but amazingly his political career appears unsinkable. He’s survived more than one crises of leadership, and he’s withstood serious attempts to remove him from office, so I think people have resorted to sensationalism in desperation.
I can still remember the beginning of the Yellow Vest protests in 2018 I think it was. And when that exploded, I thought to myself, “Okay, for sure Macron is done after this. There’s no way he can continue. He’ll either have to step down or he won’t be reelected.” But how wrong I was.
And since then, there’s been several other upheavals and disturbances in France, and Macron is still there. As a spectator to all this, it’s very disheartening to me since all my private predictions over the years of Macron being ousted have come to naught, and I see no way to actually turn France around. So, I can understand why people might think, “We have to do anything we can to delegitimize Macron”, but I don’t think this will be successful.
Doesn’t anyone see the obvious johnson poking out of Brigitte’s dress? Good grief people!
There are also women who wear wigs, of course.
An one example?? Go to a beauty salon and see for yourself.
The fact is: there are much more serious issues that are not being treated with the seriousness they deserve. The most important thing about French politics is not that there are a couple with secrets, but that this entire thing is a legitimate conspiracy against the native people, and of course this is not limited to France alone.
And it is much more suspicious that such popular figures on the American conservative right are more interested in the Macron couple and almost never speak openly about (((certain topics))).
Macron couple definitely dont deserve a book…
By my humble estimation, it’s more of a “Smith” or a “Jones” at best.
Shlomo, how about I shove your face in cookie dough and make some monkey butt cookies?
Because Michelle Obama is not a male.
But, a WHOLE LOT of naive rubes revealed how easily they can be played with that dumb trope.
No, you’re imagining things. The tan dress is obviously a densely-woven linen type fabric. It will create protrusions or bumps as she moves. When she sits in that dress, I bet it creates a big bulge across the crotch area.
It’s the FABRIC.
Meanwhile, this is her in a bathing suit. (cripes why don’t people use image search engines rather than look foolish?) https://fabrickated.com/2017/05/20/style-analysis-brigitte-macron/
NO PACKAGE!
(Don’t say it’s taped down or you’ll prove you don’t know male anatomy very well.)
Ever heard of CGI? Just sayin’…
no thanks you stupid faggot, you’re still not funny, funny looking doesn’t count.
It looks like a 40 yo USian
Gosh. I really hit a nerve with you, didn’t I rabbi?
In person I could cure you of your propensity for snark and ad hominem. Rather quickly I’m sure.
A highly superficial post – never saw anything like that on TUR.
Not worth a rebuttal.
By the way, Guyenot was not much better recently.
Wait’n see what will next appear on the Macron’s
Amren confrence 2025, a couple of pairs of 12 ounce-gloves, Jared and them can block off a little space in the conference room. Who’s in?
That’s really hot Bro………..it’s certainly a “lady”….
The only thing suspicious is the AI photos, (and I agree, it is weak), and the herculean efforts of the Macrons to prevent anyone from looking into their backgrounds, i.e. releasing photos of their young life – i.e. with her young children, at school, etc. I find it suspicious that even thosgh thelaw directs the authorities (school, etc.) to release records, the authorities refuse to do so. It is as if they got “word”.
The Macrons should open up their background. Both have very sketchy backgrounds. Macron’s mother is a trans enabler. What a coincidence.
And let’s face it. A 36 or 39 year old woman having an affair with a 14 year old boy is plenty of perversion to contemplate. IN this country they have put far younger women in prison for the same acts. They, on the other hand, were raised to the highest position in France.
I am not convinced, and my antenna is only halfway raised. Macrons wife is not unfeminine like our “Big Mike” and I don’t believe that one either.
Truth is stranger than fiction. This is too weird to NOT be true. Just like tranny Michelle. We wouldn’t even be talking about this if that info regarding they/them had not come out first. The so called elite love to use their own offspring in nefarious ways, and this scenario fits that agenda. Sickos every last one.
I was initially skeptical of Candace Owens’ claims about Brigitte being born male.
After watching most of her videos in the Becoming Brigitte series and looking at many of the photos and documents, I now believe it is reasonable to conclude Brigitte transitioned to female after being born male as Jean Michel Trogneux.
Whether it’s true or not, the controversy educates the public on how obedient puppet presidents such as Macron and Obama are created and installed.
Her videos in the series also helped me understand why the Paris 2024 Olympics ceremonies promoted transgenderism.
Suggestion: to evaluate Candace’s credibility on the Brigitte issue, watch her videos, not the videos made by critics as recommended by Google search.