RSS
I don’t mind being called a conspiracy theorist. The killing of JFK was a conspiracy, and 9/11 was a conspiracy, and I wrote theories on both, so I’m a conspiracy theorist. I don’t reject any conspiracy theory on principle. Even looking into those which are obvious nonsense can teach you something about the extent of human gullibility or about the techniques of cognitive infiltration. So in 2023 I looked into the theory that Brigitte Macron was born a man. I concluded it had a very low probability, and I told Xavier Poussard and anybody who asked for my opinion. But I didn’t want to spend any more time on it.
However, I now feel some kind of responsibility to read and review Xavier Poussard’s book, Becoming Brigitte, published last month with the endorsement of Candace Owens. So I bought the original French version, read it in a day, and posted my first impression on March 12, in an ironic tweet saying: “After 292 pages, the ultimate proof. Come on, believe!” with the following picture:
On this page 293 the author compares a photo of Brigitte Macron and a photo of her older brother Jean-Michel Trogneux at age 18, and declares them identical:
While the wide-rimmed, thick-lensed glasses make the photograph largely unusable by facial recognition, we note at least two distinctive features that further confirm that the individual born Jean-Michel Trogneux is no longer a “little fatty” but has indeed become “Brigitte”: the upturned nose and the mouth in general, particularly the lower part of the cutaneous-mucous junction line.
What else could I do, but ironize about such assurance?
Given the (predictable) reactions to my post, I’ve decided to read the book a second time and give a more detailed review here. The book, after all, is supposed to be the best presentation of the arguments that Brigitte is a man.
I’ll only deal with the book’s main thesis (the transgender thesis), which is not addressed until halfway through, from part IV. The first half of the book is, in my view, a bit of messy journalism, which pulls out all the stops to create a general picture of the pedophile-friendly world of French politics. Nevertheless, it is informative about Emmanuel Macron’s background, though I’m not able to judge the originality of the information.
The main thesis of the book is that Brigitte Macron (BM) was born Jean-Michel Trogneux (JMT), in February 1945 and not in April 1953. Jean-Michel became Brigitte in the mid-1980s. Brigitte Macron is therefore an 80-year-old transgender woman.
I will not repeat what Vincent Reynouard, a very rigorous and respected truth-seeker about the technicalities of the Holocaust, has said in this short video (with English subtitles), about the unreliability of Poussard’s use of the Chinese software for facial recognition Face++, except to mention that Poussard is guilty of retouching certain photos to make his point, for example by artificially introducing “a dental problem” (p. 275) that supposedly proves that JMT as a child had the same dental gap as BM. How did Poussard get from the photo on the left to the one on the right?
As far as the thesis itself is concerned, it fluctuates considerably, and it’s hard to keep track of its evolution. There are several versions in succession. First, there’s what Poussard calls “the Rey thesis” (p. 165), somewhat cavalierly distancing himself from Natacha Rey, since he originally endorsed her thesis, drawing thousands of people into his conviction. Based on her intuition that Brigitte Macron is a transgender man, Rey thought she recognized her in a family photo of the Trogneux, as being Jean-Michel Trogneux (first row left) and not the girl on her mother’s lap, who is supposed to be Brigitte. I reproduce here this photo for the record, in a colorized and retouched version. This part of the thesis so far has not changed: Poussard still believes it. That the features of the young Jean-Michel Trogneux fit those of Brigitte Macron is the bedrock of the science of Brigittology.
Then, following the trail of BM’s mysterious first husband, André Auzière, Natacha Rey discovered a certain Jean-Louis Auzière, who was the former husband of a certain Catherine Audoy, and she decided that the two Auzières were one and the same. According to Rey’s imagination, Catherine Audoy was, in a previous marriage, the wife of Jean-Michel Trogneux, before he changed sex to become Brigitte Trogneux. Catherine Audoy therefore is the real mother of the three children (Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine), of whom Brigitte Macron claims to be the mother, whereas she is their father. Rey believes that, following Jean-Michel’s transition to Brigitte, Catherine Audoy’s second husband (Jean-Louis = André Auzière) adopted her three children, changing their names from Trogneux to Auzière.
The three children now find themselves with two mothers, a real one and a fake one, the real one being erased from their biographies while the fake one becomes their official mother, though she is their father. It’s hard to imagine what could have convinced the children to go along with this charade, renouncing their birth names, and adopting that of someone with whom they have no biological connection—and little emotional connection, according to the authorized biography. But above all, we’d like to know how they managed to have their civil status (birth certificates and family records) changed. These are the major objections I expressed to Xavier Poussard in 2023.
I now discover in the book (pp. 193-208) that Poussard finally abandoned this theory, having been convinced that Catherine Audoy never had children. What’s more, the software Face++, on which Poussard had staked so much, validates at 81.161% (very high) the identity of the young André Auzière in Brigitte’s wedding photo, with the bald André Auzière who appears on his death announcement (p. 196-201), and who can in no way be the Jean-Louis Auzière husband of Catherine Audoy, contrary to what Ray had maintained.
Out goes the Catherine Audoy-Jean-Louis Auzière lead, which seemed so promising, which Poussard had long supported, and which had done so much to propel the rumor to national prominence.
There remains the thesis that Brigitte Macron is Jean-Michel Trogneux. That’s the constant. But then who, if not Catherine Audoy, is the mother of Brigitte’s three children? The final thesis on which Poussard settles is not clearly stated until the end of the book, pp. 295-300. Brigitte Macron was born Jean-Michel Trogneux on February 11, 1945. But before Jean-Michel changed sex and name, there had been a real Brigitte Trogneux, born on April 13, 1953 (of whom we have a photo from her First Communion and a photo of her wedding to André Auzière in 1974), but whose correspondence with our Brigitte Macron according to Face++ is only about 50% (low) (p. 235), which Poussard takes as proof that these are two different persons (ignoring the factor of facial cosmetic surgery, that Brigitte is known to have received).
The real Brigitte Trogneux, Poussard claims, died in the mid-1980s, and her brother Jean-Michel then assumed her identity, while Brigitte’s death was kept secret, without a death certificate or a tomb. According to Poussard’s script, the real Brigitte Trogneux, “knowing she was doomed by a serious illness, entrusted the custody of her children and her identity to this brother to whom she was so close and who had always felt like a woman.”
We can therefore conclude that Jean-Michel Trogneux has been living, since at least 1986, under the civil birth identity of his sister Brigitte Trogneux. Logically, Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine Auzière are his nephew and nieces. Overall, “Brigitte” cleaned up her past (Jean-Michel Trogneux) and told her sister’s past when it came to presenting herself to the French.”
What has changed from the first thesis (the Rey thesis disavowed by Poussard) is that Brigitte Macron is no longer the biological father of her children, but their biological uncle. This implies that the children have accepted that their late mother’s death be concealed (no funeral, no mourning, no tomb, etc.) and that she be replaced by their transgender uncle. But why would they agree to be burdened with such a twisted family secret? And why would the grieving widower agree to replace his wife with his brother-in-law? I couldn’t find any answers in Poussard’s book.
Two mysteries remain. Firstly, how could the real Brigitte’s death have been concealed? Was there no death certificate? Was the body buried in the Trogneux’s garden? Secondly, how did Jean-Michel Trogneux manage to disappear? Although I can’t find any mention of this in the book, it’s probably safe to assume that this second mystery is solved by the third mystery, the biggest of all: who’s the Petit Gros, the rather shy, “small chubby guy” that appeared on several occasions among the Macrons’ guests, and whom everyone claim to be Jean-Michel Trogneux? Poussard doesn’t say. But the only explanation, in the context of his hypothesis, is that he was hired, based on his looks, to “play” the Jean-Michel who had actually morphed into Brigitte.
In Poussard’s scenario, Brigitte Macron is Jean-Michel Trogneux, but not the father of Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine Auzière. New question: did Jean-Michel Trogneux have children? Yes, answers Poussard, this time going along with the official story (why?). Jean-Michel Trogneux had a son named Jean-Jacques Trogneux with a certain Véronique Dreux. Poussard was able to confirm this on the phone to Véronique Dreux, who tried in vain to convince him that her ex-husband was not Brigitte Macron. He has a lot of faults, she implied, but not that one. And she certified that he is the Petit Gros. But for Poussard, this Véronique Dreux must be part of the conspiracy: she’s lying.
Then comes an exciting new chapter. Poussard mentions (pp. 314-5), with photo support, that this Jean-Jacques Trogneux (son of Jean-Michel) and Emmanuel Macron look like brothers. Now, if Emmanuel Macron is Jean-Jacques Trogneux’s brother, and if Jean-Michel Trogneux is Brigitte Macron, this would mean that Emmanuel Macron married his own father. Poussard doesn’t formally validate this thesis, but he does mention it (what’s the point?).
I hope I’ve made myself clear. I may have missed some details. Please correct me in the comments. Some details, by the way, are totally insignificant, like “the mystery of the lampshade” deleted from some versions of the Trogneux family photo above (p. 257). Ah ah! Why erase the lampshade, if not to hide the fact that Brigitte is a man?
Poussard’s arguments often demonstrate an obsession to fill a prosecution case with everything he can get his hands on, including actual objections to his thesis. Here, for example, is how he turns evidence to the contrary into proof of his thesis (pp. 310-1). It turns out that Jean-Michel Trogneux was best man at Brigitte’s first wedding and that Brigitte was best woman at Jean-Michel’s wedding. Does this prove that they are two separate people? No, thinks Poussard.
But far from torpedoing our investigation, this information would, on the contrary, document the close proximity between Brigitte and Jean-Michel Trogneux. Indeed, we now knew that they had witnessed each other’s weddings. Brigitte Trogneux was therefore the key to Jean-Michel’s life, and vice-versa.
How daring! And that’s not all. The fact that a complete copy of Jean-Michel Trogneux’s marriage certificate was obtained by a journalist is in itself reason to doubt its authenticity!
Above all, providing a journalist with the full version of the marriage certificate was a very special and exceptional treatment, as it was contrary to the law. A town hall can only issue this type of document—a copy of a full marriage record—to a third party after a period of 75 years has elapsed (2055 in this case), or 25 years from the date of death of one of the spouses, whichever is shorter (which is not the case here). Obtaining this document was therefore totally abnormal, and its sole purpose was to strike a blow against Natacha Rey’s thesis by including Brigitte and Jean-Michel Trogneux in the same document, failing to show them visually together in the past…
In other words, if a journalist obtains proof that the thesis is false, it’s a clue that the thesis is true. This is a mode of reasoning that has unfortunately become widespread in the marshes of conspiracyland.
Some believers comment on their “intimate conviction” that Brigitte is a man. I reply that an “intimate conviction” is very powerful, but difficult to distinguish from religious faith. In this case, what is the basis of their conviction? A “body of corroborating evidence”, they tell me.
In reality, the body of evidence is pretty flimsy. I can list only four clues:
– Emmanuel Macron’s mother, Françoise Macron-Noguès, was a doctor specialized in the pathology of “primary congenital pseudohermaphroditism” (p. 130).
– Brigitte Macron sought the services of Dr. Patrick Bui in 2019, a specialist in “feminization of the facial skeleton in the context of transsexualism”, and “male-to-female sex reassignment surgery”, whom Macron decorated with the Legion of Honor on October 10, 2023 (p. 107).
– In an interview for the celebrity magazine Gala in autumn 2021 entitled “Brigitte Macron, le féminisme et moi”, Amanda Lear says she introduced Brigitte Macron to an app for retouching photos (p. 171). The detail is only significant if we admit that Amanda Lear, a French music star of the eighties, is a transsexual, which is a mere rumor.
– Brigitte Macron once quoted the line “Nobody’s perfect” from the film Some Like it Hot, saying it was her favorite movie (p. 187).
It’s a rather meagre set of clues, and not enough to support the hypothesis that Brigitte Macron is Jean-Michel Trogneux. The number of forged administrative documents (birth, marriage and death certificates), forged articles and forged testimonials that this hypothesis presupposes is considerable, and Poussard has not been able to demonstrate the slightest forgery. The alleged scale of the conspiracy of lies in the family circle of the Trogneux and Auzière families is also disproportionate.
At best, the body of evidence justifies the more banal hypothesis that Brigitte Trogneux suffered from a certain sexual identity disorder. Perhaps she even suffered from “primary congenital pseudohermaphroditism”. In this hypothesis, the meeting between Brigitte and Emmanuel would not have taken place at the “Lycée de la Providence” where Brigitte was a French teacher and Emmanuel a 14-year-old bright student, but at the medical practice of Emmanuel’s mother, Dr. Françoise Macron-Noguès. This is one possibility. But then we’d have to check the inconsistencies in the official high school legend.
On reflection, I think that Brigitte’s biography may not be all that doctored, and that, if she has decided not to make public any photos from her adolescence, there may be a simple reason, consistent with her own testimony of having been “a teenager in pain” (p. 145). What’s suspicious about this testimony? It’s also quite possible that there’s a family secret in the Trogneux family that explains certain grey areas. It’s a very common occurrence.
In conclusion, I’m at a loss to understand how Poussard could allow himself to be dragged so unabashedly into a thesis based on so few clues and so many implausibilities? Why didn’t he, at some point, pick up and move on? One reason is, of course, Poussard’s own cognitive limitations. There’s an obvious lack of objectivity in his arguments, and a propensity to over-interpret trivial details, or even invent non-existent clues. For example, he claims that Brigitte Macron lied when she said she was 8 years old when her older sister Maryvonne died, because he chooses to believe that Maryvonne died in 1960, whereas she died on February 24, 1961, less than two months short of Brigitte’s eighth birthday.
There is also a general tendency to trust that, since mainstream news are always lies, “the truth is out there”, in the fringe Internet. And the darker and the weirder is sounds, the truer is must be. This has become a general trend, encouraged by Deep State cognitive infiltration, as I pointed out in my article “Dark Pill: How Satan-Worshipping Pedophiles Have Taken Over Conspiracyland.” Poussard believes, for example, that Michelle Obama is a man, and, as far as I can see, most people who fell for the Brigitte hoax did so because they had already become convinced about Michelle.
The main reason for Poussard’s lack of objectivity, I think, is his very marked Trumpist tropism. He was impressed by the media’s announcement that Trump had “intelligence” on Macron’s sex life (p. 242). He is under the spell of the QAnon narrative, which Suzie Dawon has very accurately described as a “Pied Piper” operation (read also Caitlin Johnstone’s article), Poussard believes that Candace Owens is part of Trump’s public relation apparatus and that her opinions have the endorsement of the Oval Office. So having been interviewed by her, he is convinced that Trump will, sooner or later, provide definitive proof that he’s right—just as Trump is expected to declassify the files on Epstein and JFK!
I’m not blaming him. Who could keep a cool head with such sudden celebrity? I hope for his sake that he will regain his composure and, being still young, will be able to learn from his mistake and move on. For the moment, I find it significant that he recently retweeted the following comment posted in response to my tweet:
The fact is that the most powerful services in the world (Russian and US) and the Trump team, made up of exceptional people, have validated Xavier Poussard’s work since August 2022.
Poussard is simultaneously convinced that he is working for the truth and that he is working for Trump, Putin & Co, and these two convictions tend to get mixed up in his mind. He has lost touch with reality. He lives in another world, an imaginary world in which he is writing history.
He doesn’t understand that if his thesis is picked up by pro-Putin media or pro-Trump commentators, it simply proves that he has given them a good joke to ridicule Macron and, through him, France.
For my part, I’ve never been able to rejoice that France has become the laughingstock of the world with this affair. I’m not concerned about Macron’s reputation. Macron is a sinister figure, recruited for a sinister project. And his marriage with his high-school French teacher is a disgrace enough. It’s about the truth. I’ve heard, more than once, that even if the rumor is false, its destabilizes those in power, and that’s a good thing. Are lies and defamation legitimate political weapons? Without me.
If this story were true, if it were even probable, it deserved to be told. But that’s not the case: it’s certainly not totally impossible, but it’s highly improbable, and Poussard’s presentation of it is misleading. His investigation is a fiasco. It doesn’t serve the truth and hasn’t helped the French understand what’s happening to them. It has simply distracted them, and it has made people laugh the world over. But the time for jokes is over. A world war is looming in Europe (with, of course, the déjà-vu secret understanding that the US will join in when begged to) and Brigitte’s dick won’t hold the attention of future historians.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
There, now I have my phrase of the day! Can’t wait to hit the local diner and wow them.
Macron obviously being a faggot and Brigitte obviously looking like a tranny are two more solid clues.
How probable is it for Macron and Jean-Jacques Trogneux to look so similar by random chance?
How would you rate similarity between them on a scale 1 to 10?
Here is a real tranny, before and after. I’d rate this case 5/10 and Brigitte’s case 8 or 9/10 in terms of similarity before and after.
Theory v Hypothesis
Theory describes the tested and repeatable practice without assumptions.
Conspiracy theorists comprehensibly describe the practices of conspirators.
Hypothesis describes something untested with assumptions.
Hypotheticians are speculators until the speculations are factually proven.
That is why The Scum has largely stopped calling truthers “conspiracy theorists”, because it is factually calling somebody an expert.
Your first two clues are fairly potent, though obviously they do not stand on their own.
Who, What or Why?
I think this is a case which makes little sense without the Why. Some believe the modern very high profile emphasis on trannies is part of an elite cult which idolizes hermaphrodites and intersex people. Historical versions of this apparently existed and the modern mania is not inconsistent with cultish or secret activities. This background may be helpful to explain the legal and bureaucratic protection for those involved in the Brigitte scandal.
Miles is the master of Who in these strange public events. He can probably dredge up a handful of personal connections between the players in this saga and other very famous or powerful people. I don’t think MM has much history delving into transgender mysteries, but you may be able to pique his interest.
MrE is more into the Why side of things. If you send him an album of pictures he might point out some physical features which make the MTF (male to female) narrative more persuasive. Without debating the merits of his Christian, anti-pagan take on this worldwide tranny phenomena, he has done a real public service pointing out how many people have actually transitioned and the broad extent of the community which exists to implement these changes. It is mind numbing.
PS: The image of Jean-Jacques to the right of Macron reminds me of a blend between Misha Gessen and Valentino Rossi.
so what do you make of the “big mike” theory? does michelle really have a big black mike? please speak into the mike, barry.
The main question is: so what?
Is this really relevant?
Even if it is true, which I doubt.
Brigittology? We read a 3300 word article then get to play “guess the tranny.” It’s things like this that keeps us chained in the cave watching shadows on the wall.
Something uncanny valley here tho fer sure … Who ya gonna believe, well-argued detailed deboonking, or your own lyin’ eyes?
12 second video of younger ‘Brigitte’
You don’t have to be smart to see B. is a man. Shoulders, hands.
I think this article is to discredit Candace Owens, more than anything else. Follows R.Unz article, few days ago.
The example of people like Daniel Andrews, Victoria state former premier, Jacinda Ardern, NZ former premier, Jacinta Allan , present Victoria premier,Barack and his , and on and on. People who are compromised morally have been chosen to lead nations.
Do you know Talmud speaks about eight genders, so we know where it comes from.
Everyone must do his own research in order not to follow someone else’s thinking. John 8:31
“Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed;”
John 8:32
“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”
Thank you for your time and effort researching this and especially your last 4 sentences .
I love a good conspiracy theory but am truly frightened by what an impersonal technological war might mean.
“Brigette’s Dick” would have also made a fine title.
My rule for whether I put time into researching a question is ‘What does it matter?’ I would have said this doesn’t, but some of the other comments have convinced me it does.
As I commented on your Dark Pill essay, there’s a need for those in ‘power’ to be bonded by secrecy in a way only shame can produce. Emmanuel and Barack are both obvious captives. Their spouses would need to be in on that.
The body language of the young Brigette in Disclaimer’s attached video is unmistakably masculine.
The important take-away is that Emmanuel is not a free agent and likely has never been. He’s playing a role. They all are. Politics will not get us out of this.
“Big Mike” has a big johnson.*. [We have our own Johnson here in the commentariat.]
* The term “Johnson” is a vulgar slang term for a penis, originating from the surname “Johnson” and first used in 1863.
Here’s a more detailed explanation:
Slang Term: “Johnson” is a slang term used to refer to the male genitalia.
Origin: The word’s origin is linked to the surname “Johnson,” which is a common English surname.
First Usage: The term “Johnson” as a slang term for penis was first used in 1863.
Related Slang: It’s possibly related to the British slang term “John Thomas,” which has the same meaning.
Believe your own eyes, but look carefully everywhere:
https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1900592764653387903
The issue here is homosexual relationship.
Very perceptive article. Laurent, however, seems to think that Michelle Obama is not or was not a man. Well, “She” certainly has a masculine physique and he should watch videos showing her dancing. Looks like a giveaway to me.
Thank you for reviewing the book and injecting some common sense into this increasingly insane discussion of Brigette. Poussard probably wrote the book to take advantage of the frenzy about Brigette. Why not that’s how authors and publishers make a living. Thank you again.
I notice you haven’t convinced the Men of Unz . They’re jealous because Brigette successfully transitioned
There’s a book Queen Elizabeth one was really a man.She died about age 11. Her household quickly found a red headed boy her age. The boy passed as the child Elizabeth grew up abd ruled England for decades.
Like the moon landing, JFK controversy and 911, there will always be doubters, despite information going either way. This is because, governments and media have proven themselves to be lying for so long and with the internet making it easy to get alternate information, trust in government and media will never go back to the way it was 50, 70 or 100 years ago.
Does anyone have details on the official Macron family portrait showing a weird book in the background which was mentioned in the interview?
foolish woman, everyone knows the queen was reptilian, why do you think they called her lizard breath. educate yourself.
I see the source of this and other silly claims coming from overzealous people who are so convinced of some particular cause or idea, and want to persuade others of it so badly, that they’ll ‘augment’ it, perhaps a bit unconsciously at times, with a falsehood, and, or, someone will deliberately plant a false rumor to make others (often their political opponents) look bad.
The false rumor that a trannie had been piloting the Blackhawk that recently crashed into the jetliner might be an example of the latter, amongst others.
I certainly agree that people should stop with the silliness and get with what’s real, and that an ‘isolated’ United States won’t stay isolated in this impending WWIII, just as it didn’t stay isolated in WWI and WWII either.
Speaking of something real that you might find interesting, and involving the United States, Europe, and world war, I recently came across a book published in Germany in 1920, and it’s fascinating American book review from that same year…
The book was published in Munich in 1920 by an incredibly insightful German history professor named Dr. Ulrich Kahrstedt. The four page book review by a New York Times publication (well worth the few minutes time spent to read it) is excerpted below and was entitled Pax Americana: A Historical Study at the Turning Point of European History
https://www.jstor.org/stable/45325596?seq=1
‘All Europe is on the point of falling into servitude to the United States, whose whole international policy, he asserts, is an embodiment of State Machiavellianism aimed at complete world domination.’
‘Thus America has become the supreme dictator, and she need not trouble herself tö make this concrete; following the example of Rome, she can allow the nations of Europe to preserve a shadowy vestige of independence, exhaust themselves in mutual onslaughts, and become the helpless victims of her economic and financial domination.’
‘Under the American world rule all culture, all freedom of life, all beauty will depart.’
Some additional excerpts from the 1920 book review:
5 Dancing Shlomos is no longer a conspiracy
You just need someone in power to have the cojones to tell everyone what they already know.
Thanks Laurent Guyénot. In a civilized world that respects human dignity, Xavier Poussard should be arrested and sentenced to hard labor at the Guantanamo Bay Resort. As a prisoner without a cause, Poussard would provide some comfort to the innocent and lonely prisoners who have been deprived of any comfort for many years.
Brave Laurent is a proud conspiracy theorist, except when his jew master orders him not to be.
What is the purpose of this conspiracy theory anyway? Too much serious stuff going on in the world to really care about if the French first lady is a tranny. Candace is either having a bit of trolling fun or is bored.
It’s good that you drop some zingers on all this. One can be spry and youthful into the 60s and even the early 70s, but by the time anyone is in their eighties, gravity starts doing its bit and it gets obvious. All the chop shop surgery in the world can’t camouflage someone in their ninth decade.
This is not to say I haven’t seen men and women go strong in their later years—I’ve seen quite a few. But there are limits, and BM was not born in 1945.
Is there any chance at all that Poussard’s book was rushed into print to take advantage of the sucker’s market before the story deflated, and he’d have nothing to sell? It would explain what looks like overall shoddiness of execution.
The Brigitte affair was entertaining for a time but now it conjures up a red herring. I never really looked at her carefully but I heard her voice several times and it isn’t the voice of a tranny, let alone a man’s voice; Brigitte’s voice is that of a woman. I believe that she used to be a man as much as I believe that the Earth is flat. People need to learn to move on.
In the mean time, Macron is ruining France.
This is one of those conspiracy theories which really doesn’t matter at-fucking-all. Like whether or not Shakespeare wrote all those plays (sorry Mr. Unz, it was still a good article). It exists only to distract. Especially since Europe is so full of homos, they’d be proud of their tranny queen in France. There are so many better things to talk about, but I guess this drives clicks…
If it looks like a duck, etc. It does to me.
If Michelle Obama isn’t a transsexual, then why did Joan Rivers say that? And what is that appendage?
Macron is gay and he has no children, while not proof, points in the direction that his wife is either a “beard” or possibly a tranny. Who cares? Macron is a globalist, he is not representing the best interests of France. A typical coward. he wants to send other peoples children to die in a war that he himself would never fight.
.
I honestly appreciate this write-up because I was just not familiar with the details of the theory at all. I was aware that Candace Owens was floating it, but I was not about to sit through twenty, thirty minutes of her explaining it, and I always was more interested in what the informed French people who were behind this stuff would be saying.
Of course, I agree with the author here, but it was interesting to see Tucker Carlson in a short clip imply that Candace is likely right. I also recently met a Frenchman who believed in this…
But I do fall into the camp of thinking that belief in these things are rather harmless. They do make us look overly conspiratorial to some degree, but the media is dead set on making us look that way over anything and everything, anyways, so I always feel that overreacting to how the media portrays the right wing is a mistake since we know it will be inherently scandalous and misleading.
I am glad to know that the argument really is just circumstantial evidence and the only thing really keeping it from being extinguished is the opacity of French law.
Putin sees lies and defamation as political weapons (used against him) and calls the West the “Empire of Lies”.
He should know, having been part of the Soviet elite, and being familiar with Soviet propaganda. The Soviet Union specialized in lies and defamation, but that’s not a recommendation.
Lies and defamation as political weapons may have short term consolidated the power of the Soviet elite but over time the divergence between propaganda and reality becomes impossible to hide – particularly when the real word elsewhere (USA) has everything you lack and your fantasy propaganda world (USSR) can’t even provide basic consumer goods. It was the reality of life in the Soviet Union vs. the propaganda that led to its implosion.
Now the Jewish Empire of the West is playing the same propaganda game – especially with regard to China and it’s likely to end the same way.
So lies and propaganda aren’t a good way to go. Better to separate from the Talmudic Empire and establish an honest and clean system elsewhere. Candace Owens may actually believe this Brigitte story. She’s not using it as a propaganda weapon – just making a mistake and should do better research.
That’s a good point. If you live in the “Empire of Lies” as Putin calls it, then it’s wall to wall lies so what are a few more lies regarding Brigitte Macron?
As Emmanuel Todd says in his recent book “La Défaite de L’Occident” the West is now in a Zero state regarding religion, with voided morality and ethics.
The prurient interest of the public in the sexuality of politicians
is one of the stranger modern cultural trends. I can’t recall
anyone caring or talking about the the sex life of Harry and
Bessie Truman.
Then, we went from the Kennedy escapades and Gary Hart,
to Pizzagate, Epstein, Trump and now Brigitte and Michelle.
Are people so bored by their own lives that they can be
titillated by the most vapid marionettes on the stage?
The first researcher you mention rejects the “Illuminati Tranny” hypothesis out of hand. His refusal to engage with it at all seems suspicious to me.
Mr. E strikes me as an honest researcher, although his claim that EVERY woman in Hollywood might be a secret tranny probably goes too far. He has a lot of videos that go deeper into the history of the transgender priesthoods which were a common feature of the mystery cults of antiquity, continuing into the Renaissance and beyond with eunuchs. He claims that this practice simply went underground at some point, and is now being gradually unveiled. He believes the elite of this world continue to practice the old religion. There’s your why. The bizarre and inexplicable “launching” of transgenderism into the public consciousness around 2015 was also obviously a completely inorganic event decreed from the top. The simple fact that regular people even know what trannies ARE now should be considered a huge red flag. They’re slowly initiating us all.
The heavily censored scholar of Judaism, Chris Jon Bjerknes, goes deepest of all, showing that Kabbalist rabbis believe that after Moshiach comes and “rectifies the world” (…eliminates Gentiles), a remnant of Jewish souls will inherit the new Paradise after being given new, incorruptible, hermaphroditic bodies.
That’s why Henry Kissinger, Chuck Schumer, Barack Obama, Bill Gates, Donald Trump, Emmanuel Macron, and so many more have obvious tranny wives. It’s part of some ancient religion somewhere at the weird intersection of Judaism, demon worship, and simple perversion.
Perhaps the decision was made to allow Brigitte Macron, one of the most obvious presidential trannies, to be “outed” as a kind of limited hangout. Poussard presents her/his case as being (1) motivated exclusively by personal pathology and (2) having nothing to do with Macron’s rise to power. In other words, by allowing this book to be published, the cabal is hoping to draw attention away from the cult, which is the really important thing, and possibly make the whole idea seem so ridiculous to regular people that they will be inoculated against noticing that it’s part of a much larger phenomenon. They want us to see what they’re doing, but they also want us to repress that knowledge. This is how hypnosis works.
Brigitte is transgender, the evidence is overwhelming, deniers are simply deluding and embarrassing themselves: http://pressibus.free.fr/gen/trogneux/indexgb.html
The short and fat guy never claimed he was Jean-Michel Trogneux and never gave an interview. No photographs of Brigitte as a teenager, pregnant wife or young mother. Meanwhile:
This photo shows transgender “Brigitte” in 1987, more than ten years after her transition through hormone therapy and plastic surgery. What is your point? This photo actually strengthens the transgender case because she looks identical to the transgender “Veronique” that appeared in a 1977 interview. We also know that “Brigitte” has the exact same voice, speech patterns, posture and gestures as “Veronique”: http://pressibus.free.fr/gen/trogneux/indexgb.html. What you won’t find is photos of Brigitte as a teenager and young woman (prior to transition), as a pregnant wife, or as a young mother.
Wrong, because it is part of the bigger conspiracy of who controls Macron and how he has become President: http://pressibus.free.fr/gen/trogneux/indexgb.html
Its ridiculous that you get sued and convicted of criticizing and commenting presidents husband, not a wife, but husband, because thats who he is, a man. Brigitte Macron is a man.
1. The evidence is as overwhelming as for the Earth being flat.
2. All trannies have residue of male timbre in the voice, Brigitte has none, zero, she has a woman’s voice.
3. Who bloody cares if Brigitte has a johnson? Who bloody cares if she’s a tranny? The bigger scandal is that Macron was 15 and she was 39, regardless of her gender. The greatest scandal is that Macron has ruined France. Brigitte’s gender is a non-issue.
What is more ghoulishly fascinating to me is why a youngish black woman who has managed to trick a decent looking white British man to marry her and has very young, tender children to raise – would conjure up so much vinegar and vitriol into her life ???
Why not focus on your family and the ridiculously nice life you have made for yourself by shrewishly screaming your opinions despite being essentially talentless by every measure?
She’s just another black race hustler. She just switched teams because she knew the Retarded Right would go:
Black woman! Did not stab me! Can make a sentence! Did not twerk! Give her millions and the Keys to the Kingdom!
Boring
A dram of evil doth all the noble substance of a doubt to his own scandal
Got to hand it to the spinmeisters, the tranny thing is one of the best distractions they’ve ever come up with. As we struggle with the curse of our Puritanical heritage, anything to do with sex still wows us, and the more freakish the better. They killed the ERA with fears of angry dykes invading men’s bathrooms, they railed against gay marriage saying it would open the door to marrying animals, they still claim gay men are all boy rapers – like the man said, you can fool some of the people all of the time.
What most interested me in Mr. Guyénot’s review is his analysis of Poussard’s character. After pointing out the improbabilities, if not absurdities, of Poussard’s theories Guyénot asks himself why Poussard pursued them and persists in pursuing them. Naturally enough he attempts to answer that question through ‘psycho’analysis.
Mirrors within mirrors. Why is ‘history’ so unreliable? Because of the historians.
Guyénot moves the focus from the subject, Brigitte, to the (would-be) ‘historian,’ Poussard. The reader of this review might move a step still farther from the subject by shifting the focus from Poussard to Guyénot.
Hence the hall of mirrors.
Ancient history is no different. Historians long ago shifted the focus from Tiberius to Tacitus and from the Emperor Justinian’s court to Procopius. The focus keeps shifting back, farther and farther from the subject.
As for the subject of all the brouhaha, Brigitte, what evidence do I find most determinative? The photographs, individally, one by one… without reference to Poussard’s theories.
Guyénot rejects ‘intimate convictions.’ Is that wise? What about your own ‘intimate convictions’? Does the Trogneux family portrait not give you a ‘feeling’? Is not a picture ‘worth a thousand words’?
Is Macron ‘sinister’? I described him so the other day, along with Starmer. Would he be a different person if he had sired children?
Thanks for the mention of Vincent Reynouard — last I heard, he had been arrested in Scotland and was fighting extradition to France — after spending 15 months jailed (‘on remand’) in Scotland, ultimately he was sent back to France, put on trial, and apparently a verdict is pending — if he is posting on social media, I assume that means he’s free during the trial.
French Holocaust denier stands trial after extradition from Scotland
Macroni is a rothchild banker, in sum, a USian. AUSUKer
Thank you, Mr. Guyénot, for this attempt at damage control to uphold the good reputation of the real France.
Poussard’s missteps on this specific topic should have remained confined to “Faits & Documents”, where they could have been nuanced over time and eventually faded into oblivion.
The allure of notoriety was likely too strong for this poor fellow.
It must be said that Emmanuel Ratier’s legacy seems impossible to uphold in today’s technological environment. One solution might have been the creation of a site like this one, but to fund, build, and maintain a fortress like TUR, Alain Soral certainly did not have the right connections with our money masters.
I am more concerned about E&R’s blind bet on Trump. It seems the association has fallen into the trap of a Mike King-style QAnonism, which—I believe—will only lead them to ridicule. Esteemed contributors, like Y. Hindi, are now treading the risky path of Poussard, adding their twigs to the Organization’s pyre. Sancta Simplicitas!
Excellent point – and elegantly expressed.
Is there a ‘cave’?
Is there a ‘wall’?
Are there ‘shadows’?
I believe Miles has some blind spots; nothing more, nothing less.
I am not religious so I cannot go all the way with MrE. I am spiritual, so I can go most of the away.
Thanks for the reference.
Disagree.
I believe these high profile tranny cases are promoted by the same people involved with organized pedophilia, trauma-based mind control and obscene satanic rituals related to their beliefs. They want power over all else and are eager to break all natural laws of human behavior to touch this power. Anyone involved in this sort of stuff cannot be trusted on anything, ever.
When all worthwhile gossip is expended, there is sex to chew on. What brings our leaders mentally down to our level more than zinging their sex lives.
I am an agnostic on the tranny-Macron conspiracy theory. It’s mild entertainment, and certainly on the feminine branch of the conspiracy theory tree, with all its implicit cattiness and National Enquirer feel about it.
Our age is one of great mistrust throughout the West where almost everything is up for question. I also think that certain utterly implausible conspiracy theories are put out to smear highly credible ones, sort of poisoning the well. Legitimate conspiracy theorists then come off as deranged because they carry the same label as the kooks. The Macron affair may just be an example of this.
This reminded me of how, a few years ago I viewed a few Youtube videos that tried to establish which NFL quarterback had the quickest release. These used complicated, high-tech methods – – counting the frames per second, comparing distance of the pass being thrown, etc. etc. etc. In the comments, some viewers discussed the high-tech methods. Other commenters laughed and said that “the eye test” sufficed quite well to give them the answer. By the way, every one of ‘the eye test” commenters picked the same quarterback, and probably you already know the answer.
TKK (aka The Khazarian Kike) writes this about Candace Owens:
Of course, you and fellow Jews would’ve wished that she’d done just that. But she didn’t.
Instead, by recently interviewing a survivor of the USS Liberty, Candace has introduced this matter to millions of people that would not otherwise have known about this heinous Jewish attempt at a False Flag.
And in the process she has impugned the reputation of your precious Apartheid Israeli state.
And that’s not all. Candace Owens has spoken about other matters and sacred issues that the Jews would rather she hadn’t.
And Mr Khazarian Kike, you’re worried that the profile of Candace Owens will grow greater still, that she’ll attract a following of scores of millions more.
And then …. Owens will start talking about the JFK coup d’etat and especially the 9/11 False Flag.
THEN, their cover will be blown – the cover of Malignant International Jewry.
Once a critical threshold of Americans become aware of what the depraved Talmudists have done to them and the world, you’re worried that there will be a pogrom.
Be honest Mr Khazarian Kike. That’s what really worries you, doesn’t it?
Ok, Brigitte Johnson! Can we please move on, to for example Emanuelle Napoleone Bon Apart Metatron? Clever move recently: “Putin has no say in us Placer quelques Gendarmes au bord de la Dniepr!”
I just find this funny. Agree with most of your points.
Hardly a ‘mere rumour’. Lear’s constantly changing tales regarding date and place of birth and upbringing are strong circumstantial points.
Two of her fellow dancers at the tranny cabaret Le Carrousel in Paris are on record as stating that they knew Lear as a fellow performer (under Lear’s then stage name) in the mid-sixties. That makes it certain.
There is more, but it isn’t in the realm of rumour, rather, that of fact.
Or, as Elie Wiesel put it after being exposed as a fraud, “Which is better, truth that is a lie or the lie that is truth?” So, sure, Holocaust lies and grotesque exaggerations are the truth because they’re better. That makes sense. Same with those other official narratives, which brings up the question of why the Holocaust, USS Liberty, JFK/RFK assassinations, 9/11, Epstein, etc. now make up the core of official DC narratives, not because they’re true, you see, but because they’re better, at least for those who run this administration from the shadows, or controlled the autopen popularly known as the Biden Administration.
These gender benders are so confusing. I gave up half way through trying to work out who’s who in this drama.
Two articles about this in the last few days and neither care to mention that the defamation cases won by Mr. Brigitte weren’t about the central question, was she born a man, but rather about irrelevant information the journalist didn’t get right. Also, when Candace was served with a threatening letter from the Macron’s it created a legal channel for her to reply with point blank questions: Is Brigitte Macron a biological male, is the Brigitte Macron currently married to the President of France the same pictured in the wedding pictures provided. Again radio silence. They want this to go away but they refuse to answer the central question. Now a couple days after Tucker mentions we get two unnecessary articles dismaying us from even considering it. Interesting or should I say predictable?
If Brigitte is supposedly a man, then it is a man I would definitely do the wild thing with. Which is to say, she ain’t no man. Why she married Macron I’ll never know.
On the other hand, I’ll be go-to-hell if Michelle isn’t a dude.
Macron and Barack are a little light in the loafers for sure.
To each his own or each to the devil his own way… take your pick.
I care as much about Macron and his private life as I care about some white dude marrying Black whats her name. That is to say, I think about both as much as the dump I took same time last year !
I dont even care about the fact that the man had a hand in the continuing ruination of France. The country has changed Paris especially. A look at old film shows well dressed elegant women and men.
These days Paris is infested with the shit of the Third World, all of whom have brought their habits, grudges and 300 year old feuds and vendettas with them. Villages lost in the beautiful countryside are riddled with darkies. One can only wonder how the hell they got there.
In another 25 years, France will be predominantly Black and Brown.
The French elite could care less as long as their nest is feathered. Push come to shove they can fly out in a moments notice to places so expensive and elitist that even the Wogs are not hired as servants.
Right now its a free for all as Third World scum claim their free benefits. The problems, already manifest, will come when the Whites who carry the taxation burden, can no longer do so. Expect France and Paris especially to go up in flames when non-whites no longer receive their welfare handout. Lets face it Third World trash are takers and nothing else.
So while the multitude speculates whether Brigitte packs a 9 inch sledge, the country is going to shit ! There must be a conspiracy to deflect and distract the public-somewhere there.
It’s Granny Macron, not Tranny Macron! It’s her little rooster husband who is the bigger asshole in the greater scheme of things.
Bonjour Laurent,
Le problème que vous n’évoquez même pas, c’est que les Macron auraient un moyen très simple de mettre fin aux rumeurs : un test ADN de Brigitte.
Pourquoi ne le font-ils pas ? Je ne vois que deux raisons possibles :
– soit ils profitent de la rumeur, mais alors comment ?
– soit ils cachent quelque chose de grave.
Votre avis ?
All of Europe and America are the laughingstocks of the world not just France. These formerly overwhelmingly White nations don’t have the guts to boot the kikes and their non white WMD from raping and murdering Whites in their own lands, treating Whites as second class citizens, etc. The mayor of London is a Paki, good gawd, Pakis and Apericans groom and rape British girls, we all know that unfortunately raping the enemy’s women is a part of WAR. And the French have always been negrophiles from way back. Those old time Black fighters like Sam McVey loved France, Battling Siki who lived in Paris would walk down the street with a pet lion, had two White wives and partied away in French nightclubs. We are talking the 1920’s not the 2020’s. Hitler even writes in Mein Kampf how the French were already negro lovers back then. Trannies are the least of Whitey’s worries.
I write from France, Paris. To all the people here who think that it is not important to know the truth : if the Macron ‘s really have something very dark to hide, then one can think that this secret is already known by eg. the CIA, or the FSB, or the mafia, or the Rothschilds or… you name it. It is the same story with Trump being an asset of Russia btw. As Emmanuel Macron could try to launch a nuclear holocaust, this is not a very nice situation.
If Brigitte really is a man then this is a case a pedophilia that according to French laws could still be brought to justice until the next birthday of Emmanuel Macron in December 2025. This could be the best opportunity to get rid of him as president of a nuclear capable country.
You’re obviously a noob, my friend:
1) False: Earth is not flat (though you might be a flat Earther)
2) False: Trannies don’t have male timbre in voice (listen to 1977 “Veronique”)
3) False: he was not 15 but 14. You really know nothing.
And the fact that Macron has ruined France is part of the very same scandal! Who do you think controls Macron and made him President of France?
America is now deporting SOME illegal non whites BUT what about the LEGAL domestic MOSTLY African Americans who rape or sexually assault White women to the tune of about a 100 a day. What about the (((enemy inside our gates))) who make no bones about their plans to destroy White nations through various methods, one of those is importing MILLIONS of third world non whites legally or illegally, really a rapist is a rapist, a murderer is a murderer, the victim doesn’t care if they are legal or illegal.
Now, is this a conspiracy or is it the truth?
Are America’s (((elections))) selections or auctions? Conspiracy or the truth.
Was America’s 2020 (((election))) a fraud? Conspiracy or the truth.
IF you answered conspiracy to any of the above please feel free to consider yourself a retard.
And btw, does it really matter if a non white is legal or illegal? A Pakistani has no business being the mayor of London nor does a Dot Head have any business running for POTUS. I don’t consider Virginia or Texas as Southern states but America has only elected 3 Southern white males as POTUS in nearly 250 years, only 2 since the 1900’s. Seems to me that America has a bias against Southern white males. Conspiracy or the truth?
“What is the purpose of this conspiracy theory anyway?”
The same guys who were instrumental in getting Obama (pretty much an unknown) elected hopped on a plane to France and then got Macron (pretty much an unknown) elected. I remember reading a good article about it at the time. The media sold them to the masses, cheerleading for both of them.
What does it matter? Well, who does that? Who creates a narrative and then lays out money to put two highly compromised people (and they would have known they were at the time) on the thrones of two major countries?
You could hold their secrets when they complied with your wishes, threaten to crush them when they didn’t want to go along, or use them as a scapegoat when you needed to. Who knows, maybe Macron doesn’t really want to be posturing against Russia at the moment, but suddenly a book appears, a book that was apparently eight years in the making, a book that was just sitting on a shelf.
How many black men would have voted for Obama if they had known he was gay? Not many.
Ok, you disagree with the book and showed it to be a scam.
But you did buy it, and that was probably all Poussard wanted.
Well, what chose de grave?
“I concluded it had a very low probability, and I told Xavier Poussard and anybody who asked for my opinion. But I didn’t want to spend any more time on it.”
It’s a shame you changed your mind. You should have taken the advice you gave Poussard “to pick up and move on.”
“if his thesis is picked up by pro-Putin media or pro-Trump commentators, it simply proves that he has given them a good joke to ridicule Macron and, through him, France…..”
Sorry to inform you that Macron and through him France deserve ridicule on far more serious issues, like Macron’s silly Napoleonesque ambitions, and it is not Brigitte’s genitalia but Macron’s “umbrella” that is the butt of j0kes.
“It doesn’t serve the truth and hasn’t helped the French understand what’s happening to them. It has simply distracted them, and it has made people laugh the world over.”
It doesn’t look like anything helps France “understand what’s happening to them.” Not you, wasting time on this distraction.
I agree. I’ve got something she can wrap that little pursed, wrinkled mouth around.
And this is exactly why controlled opposition, limited hangout, false flags and their narratives and co-opting everything is what they are now doing more than ever.
It’s not just about doing a false flag then covering it up.
Like the fake theater of the fake assassination of Trump, the point is to create the whole event and manage every single side so every side is chasing their tails.
It’s all way too complicated and unbelievable for the plebes to process that they are doing all this.
Blacks would have still voted for the half Black Obama even if they knew he was gay. Blacks will ALWAYS vote Black, look at the pale skinned affirmation action Black General Colon Bowel, he dropped the color blind pussy White republicans like a hot potato to support Obammy. You obviously haven’t been around nigras which is actually good but it can also make you quite vulnerable when dealing with the scamboogers. Whites are the only people who go against their own people.
Hey, so I guess this afternoon is when we get to read James Jesus Angleton’s poem in the Furioso special edition,
Here upon the grassy nole,
I shoot my gun and make a hole,
And Jackie grabs the brain gush quick,
It makes me want to yank my dick.
Tucker and Candace are both deep cover CIA/Judeo-Masonic Supremacists employed by the Agency to appear to be real truth tellers, but are actually controlled opposition themselves… just not the obvious kind, but the more cryptic Limited Hangout Agent kind.
THEY WOULDN’T BE ALLOWED ON JEWTUBE IF THE WERE GENUINE OPPOSITION.
THEY. WORKED. FOR. THE. CRIMINAL. CABAL
FROM. THE. START.
AND… STILL… DO!!!
THE PLEBES NEED TO STOP SMOKING THEIR HOPIUM.
“Mr. Guyenot should go back to school, not the one for languages or history that he attended, but the one for science, in order to accurately estimate the Bayesian models that can be established for the case, which show a probability of more than 99% that Brigitte is a man. But for that, he shouldn’t just read by guesswork; he should quantify the consequences of his reading.”
Mao Zedong was at least right about one thing.
You’re one thousand percent right about French negrophilia. I don’t know when it started, but it was totally out of control throughout the twentieth century.
Is it diminishing somewhat today, in light of the black onslaught? No. Anti-whiteism and pro-blackism have become the state religion of every Western country. ‘Heretics’ are punished.
The average young (and older) white American ‘loves’ blacks. The ones who don’t, and verbalize that fact, are anathematized.
In the US antiblackism is already de facto illegal. Soon it will be explicitly illegal. Count on it. The white race is on the way out.
This is the Eighties and Loc is down with the ladies.
Cue: Funky Cold Medina by Tone Loc
That’s a superb description of the unraveling of the Paris/France culture and society. I had to remind myself you were not writing about California, which is where I live (stuck here). About a year ago, a poll ranked the 50 states for “politeness,” and California was number 50. (Montana was number 1). I wonder where that 50-ranking came from. And make no mistake, this sensibility is contagious; traditional Americans catch it.
I like the kikes they pay me good
They treat me like a person should
I hate my boss at CIA
He won’t let me shoot JFK
1) I never said the Earth was flat.
2) Yes they do, male vocal cords are longer and thicker than female and they are not modified by sex change operations. They produce a different timbre. Brigitte has female vocal cords.
3) You’re nitpicking. It’s abuse of a minor regardless.
And no, it isn’t part of the same scandal. Macron’s actions matter, what Brigitte has in her pants is irrelevant.
My position on this story remains unchanged- I don’ know “what” Brigette is, or who, but the entire story is super fishy!
Any family story, or multiple family’s stories, with this must mystery, intrigue, and oddities, is smoke from some fire.
Even if you dismissed all of the conspiracies, and accept the published story, that little Macron became smitten with his middle aged, married, mother of 3, and fucking ugly ass teacher, it would be a weird story, BEFORE he somehow “became” the President! But his family story is also very weird.
Thus- there is something here, we just can’t be certain “what” it is, but it’s not a nothing-burger. There is some strange shit going on…
Tucker Carlson’s guest is not referring to a “Macron family portrait”. He is referring to the “Official portrait of the President Emmanuel Macron” published in June 2017.
There are three books on a desk:
– « Mémoires de guerre » – Général de Gaulle
– « Le Rouge et le Noir » – Stendhal
– « Les nourritures terrestres » – André Gide
« Mémoires de guerre » (War memories) – General de Gaulle
The Title is self-explanatory. It is also a rite of passage for all presidents in France to claim to be heirs to de Gaulle, even when they actually aim to deconstruct the remnants of what de Gaulle has built (Sarkozy, Hollande, Macron).
« Le Rouge et le Noir » (The Red and the Black) – Stendhal.
Here, the color red refers to the army, and black to clergy. Interestingly enough, there are several similitudes between the protagonist Julien Sorel and Emmanuel Macron: upbringing, deception, hypocrisy, love affair with an older woman, how they both rose socially, introduction to the elites, etc. To me, the presence of this book is already a clue.
There are no Christian values, no morality, no ethics here!
« Les nourritures terrestres » (The Fruits of the Earth) – André Gide
André Gide was a known pedophile. He was “initiated” by North African boys. He has written on homosexuality, incest, has promoted pedophilia, etc.
In André Gide’s work, attacks on Christian values, morality and ethics are taken to much higher levels than in « Le Rouge et le Noir » – Stendhal.
Of all the books Macron might have chosen (from Molière, Guillaume Apollinaire, Victor Hugo, Marcel Proust, Honoré de Balzac, Émile Zola, Voltaire, etc.), the selection of this specific book by André Gide is a major clue!
Don’t talk about that! Let’s focus on Brigitte’s genitalia.
Why should they? Who are you to tell the Premiere of France what to do?
How about I order you to take a DNA test and sent the results to me?
If true, this is very low on the list of Macron’s “dark secrets.” It is far more important to investigate his meteoric rise from a functionary of a Rothschild bank to President of France.
The fact that you think that getting rid of Macron would change anything at all in a country long hijacked by zioglobalist powers, indebted for generations to come to the IMF, and turned into a latrine of the worst of the third world human detritus shows you live in a bubble even though you had plenty of time to wake up.
What did your PM, Manuel Vals (Spanish born) say more than 10 years ago? That if 500,000 ethnic Spaniards were to leave France thee would be no effect but of 500,000 Jews left, Frace will no longer be France. Were you awake then?
Correct. And keep in mind that “Amanda Lear” is even older than “Brigitte Macron” (and still looks more feminine). The deniers have really made fools of themselves:
Wrong on everything again:
1) You said “the evidence is overwhelming the Earth is flat”: false, there is no evidence.
2) You obviously have never heard of feminization laryngoplasty, i.e. transgender voice surgery, in addition to transgender voice therapy. You CAN’T distinguish the voices, and “Brigitte’s” voice is IDENTICAL to “Veronique’s” voice, a known transgender woman. https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/transgender-voice-therapy-and-surgery/about/pac-20470545
3) No nitpicking: 15 might have been legal, 14 was illegal.
And yes, it’s part of the same scandal: it’s not about what “Brigitte” has in his pants, but about who has masterminded the entire Macron operation.
End of discussion. You’re really just a clueless noob. It was fun discrediting you.
It’s a “package” deal with Barry and Big Mike!
It ought to be obvious by now that the Jews are behind the levers of history. Their ‘bankers’ hands never tire of pulling and pushing those levers. The Jews understand their role as destroyers. When a Jew borrows money from a Jewish bank both lender and borrower understand implicitly the essence of the deal. The money costs neither the Jewish borrower nor the Jewish lender one thin dime.
Jews borrow and lend to Jews with the sole aim of monopolizing every sector of the economy — without a single exception! Wall Street is run by Jews. The Federal reserve and Treasury is run by Jews. America’s policies are determined by Jews. They have been instrumental in stealing the *working capital* from the Goyim in America since 1913. All the while pretending the manifestations are American values! They are most certainly not American values anymore than the nonsense promulgated in Germany in the 19th Century were German values!
Adolph Hitler understood this, explicitly. How could he not? Freeing Germany from their Jewish overlords whose quiver of nefarious confabulations gave Germany its “character” was a sensible aim.
So much of the ‘boots on the ground history’ has been covered up, massaged, calculatingly reimagined, glossed and carefully selected, so as to create a completely false and devastatingly inaccurate parcel of entwined lies. The intentionally resultant chaos is almost impossible to gainsay.
By 1913 the Jews had, in a final burst of creative manipulation, captured the U.S. economy. Jews managed a coup. A “coup” refers to a sudden, illegal, and often violent seizure of power, typically by a small group, often to overthrow the existing government. It is a French term, meaning “stroke” or “blow.” This “coup” was not violent. But soon enough violence followed hard on the heels of 1913.
Mr Hitler had their number. Most certainly Jews died in large numbers wherever they were caught between the armies of Stalin and the armies of Hitler. Eastern Europe was convulsed by the clashing of these forces. Eastern Europe was highly populated by Jews. Of course there, chaos reigned. Unusually for Jews they found no succour among the warring parties — among neither the Germans, the Russians, nor the ethnic others in the borderlands of Eastern Europe. Jews were caught there in a web of their own making. They let loose the dogs of war and there in Eastern Europe, they got mauled!
When Germany finally capitulated, Jews perpetuated the myth that only Jews died or were raped or dispossessed or separated in various compounds, during the war they most certainly promulgated.
Recall the headlines in the early 1930s in America, “Jews declare war on Germany!” 40,000 of them convened in Madison Square Garden to proclaim their war.
Jews manifested the same power in Germany in the 19th Century as they now do especially in the United States. Wherever Jews were active they intrude!
Reflect, readers, on the last paragraph: “Germany … is temperamentally incapable of believing in altruistic motives.”
This is Jewish not German!
Jews found Catholic domains harder to dislodge — but Protestant domains were much more vulnerable to Jewish intrusion. Both Catholics and Protestants are high trust Christians. Obviously Jews cannot be trusted. Adolph Hitler well and truly understood Germany’s predicament! But the Jews fought back and they had the means i.e. the money, to do it. Hence WW II.
Jews are the most powerful force in the United States — at the moment! What have they not done to bait the Russians in eastern Ukraine? It appears that Putin refuses to be baited. He was most justified in protecting the ethnic Russians in eastern Ukraine. Though one will struggle to find this disclosed in the mainstream media — properties Jews overwhelmingly own and control!
Thanks to the Palestinians in Gaza the Jewish diaspora in what they call Israel has illuminated the Jewish character like no other recent events has. Today in the United States the present stooge — what’s his name Donald Trump — is doing his best — for his handlers, to outlaw against protesting the Jews vile behaviour in what Jews call Israel.
It is said to be anti-Semitic. Surely as god made little apples that trope is past its utility. For the most part Jews are not a Semitic people. Most of the Arabs in Palestine are Semitic. How did the Jews manage that transition? Netanyahu is an Ashkenazi European. Yet he claims Jews — which the name itself is a recent manufacture — have an ancient connection to an imagined past which never existed.
Tragically millions of people whom identify as Jews have been suckered into believing Palestine is Jewish. It never was. Some Jews like to claim there was never a region called Palestine! Why then is Palestine specifically named in the Balfour Declaration — pray tell?
And what about those Jews studying their *ancient books* — rocking back and forth as they recite their gibberish? Significantly this is what those poor sods afflicted with autism resort to because it appears to regulate their emotional instability. Commonly those with autism rock back and forth. It is a form of self-stimulation called “stimming” which appears to help to regulate sensory input, manage emotions, or find comfort and predictability in a world that can be overwhelming.
This desire for succour from the outward tribulations of life manifests in a deep seated need for control. Autistic people seek succour in restricted or repetitive patterns of behaviour, interests, and seek emotional regulation by controlling their surroundings. One might suggest without exaggeration that many Jews are high functioning autistics.
Not to mention their pretend benevolence — only ever deployed when it advantageous. Think here especially of the Sackler family! On the one hand promoting i.e. pushing the drug OxyContin know by them to be devastatingly lethal while endowing galleries with their enormous profits.
This to ensure their names are plastered on the galleries and on the buildings and in every sort of pamphlet or magazine article by way of ensuring they are seen as benevolent contributors to society. These endeavours of course are meant to impress the people whom are inclined to support the arts.
Then these “knobs’ get to rub shoulders with the old money elites whose acceptance they crave.
Weirdly they have no concern they were revealed and indeed fined. But they still managed to keep most of their gains.
The Sackler family all appear to be hyper-self-aware yet have no social awareness whatsoever. Their reverence for money power has no bounds whatsoever.
They have no shame.
This appears among the wealthy Jewish communities to be the lens through which they seek acceptance. They imagine they can buy acceptance. If not the Jew will then kill in retribution for the distain they intuit that the Goyim have for them.
Jews have no shame.
1) No, I said that the evidence that Brigitte is a tranny is as overwhelming as the evidence that the Earth is flat.
2) Laryngoplasty doesn’t change vocal cords.
3) No, it was illegal at 15 too, because she was his teacher and had authority over him.
Arrogant French dimwits who thing they’re supersmart in spite of having no clue like you are the reason why France is in its current situation. As for who masterminded the whole operation, obviously, with people like you in the opposition, it wasn’t a difficult feat. The fact that Macron sniffs cocaine never was a problem but whether Brigitte is or isn’t a tranny is history changing. Pauvre imbécile.
This is all very convoluted and confusing. I am convinced Brigitte is a man based on the circumstances and perverse fields/interests of the relatives, but the ONE detail from all of this that I find the most unforgettably striking is the practically unbelievable resemblance between Emmanuel Macron and Jean-Jacques Trogneux. Is there ANY coherent scenario in which the 3 are related but at some further degree than all being father/son(s), though? Could Jean-Michel/Brigitte be the uncle or some other close but non-parental kin of Emmanuel, for example, so the uncanny resemblance can be explained without the inferred incestuous abuse being QUITE as horrific as father/son? If not, could Jean-Jacques not exist, or something? Perhaps the images provided of him are fakes and they chose photos of Emmanuel, for some inexplicable reason, to alter them and then present those to the public as images of Jean-Jacques? Idk why they’d do that since they’re not supposed to be related so it’d seem only serve to raise eyebrows but it’s virtually impossible that their resemblance is coincidental/accidental because I think I’ve literally never seen such a distinct resemblance between two people. It feels like parody.
The power of the media to shape public opinion is nowhere more on display than taking a former homosexual call boy named Barry Soetoro with unverified undergraduate and law degrees and, not just transforming him into BHO, but getting white women, white beta males, and white-hating minorities to vote for him twice as if he were their god. These people, whose thoughts are authored by TV news and Hollywood, still treat “Obama” with the reverence due a god of old.
The made-up Obama identity was apparently the creation of two of America’s worst political criminals, William Ayres and his wife Bernadette Ornstein, who in Ayres’s case was awarded for his crimes with a sinecure/platform at the U of Chicago to plan the annihilation of America. It was Ayres who was taped by an FBI agent, saying that 25 million Americans would have to die (ie, be murdered by the communists) to achieve the communist takeover Barry Soetoro, aka Obama, was placed in the White House to bring about.
“2. All trannies have residue of male timbre in the voice, Brigitte has none, zero, she has a woman’s voice.”
Not that I believe or disbelieve or even care about the theory of it being a trannie, there is surgery on vocal chords some trannies go through to change their voice.
You can take it as fact, but the fact is that it is a rumor. And we know exactly who started the rumor and why. Extract from the French Wikipedia, Google translated:
So again, the only fact we can be sure of is that it is a rumor. Now you may decide that this rumor is in fact a fact, but the fact is that it is a rumor.
This rumor, of course, was part of the transgender agenda.
I’m with you wholeheartedly. What about your car, does It run on dead-dinosaur bones?
When the only tool has is a hammer…
You tend to… like 72 year olds?
Poussard believes, for example, that Michelle Obama is a man, and, as far as I can see, most people who fell for the Brigitte hoax did so because they had already become convinced about Michelle.
********************************************************************************
Big Mike almost certainly is a man. His height and big-framed body and coarse-featured face makes it near certain. Nothing feminine about the freak. Of course when he’s on TV with a $12,000 dress and $6000 wig and false eyelashes he looks ok. That can be done with any man. But the many pics of Big Mike in everyday life tell another story.
Oval face wide cheekbones tapering not square jaw pointed chin. It’s a typical European face that hundreds of millions of White people have. I have it you probably have it look in the mirror
Whether male, female or an it, that poor thang needs to eat. Good gawd, her legs are toothpicks.
Cue: Whole Lotta Rosie by AC/DC
Of the three books Macron displays on his desk, two are no-brainers:
De Gaule because he fancies himself as his heir.
Gide because of shared proclivities and morality.
But Stendhal? If he identifies with Julien Sorel, the arriviste in Le Rouge et le Noir pursuing a married older women then he may have not finished reading the novel. Sorel eventually has his head chopped off.
Maybe he was attracted by this Stendhal confession: “In Memoirs of an Egotist he writes: “Will I be believed if I say I’d wear a mask with pleasure and be delighted to change my name?…for me the supreme happiness would be to change into a lanky, blonde German and to walk about like that in Paris.”
Thank you. Did the presence of the third book create a scandal at the time?
Some women are taller than 5’8. Some women don’t have the ideal perfect feminine oval faces wide cheekbones tapering jaws pointy chin as Brigette does. Some women have wide jaws like men. Brigette does not
Emmanuel was hooking up with Brigitte when he was just a student, and you could only fantasize about it. He thought Russians were free people for too long – they’re just China’s pawns now. Vive la liberté!
I agree, though the creation of Macron and his “wife” by the Jewish “elites” is a part of the engineering of front men and demonstrates their power and ability not only to create a total fiction but to then sustain it through the media and their other instruments of power.
These freaks aren’t just accidents but deliderate creations who can easily be controlled. We’ve seen this over and over in all the Western nations. The greater the violation from the natural, the greater the control.
Les Francais, les idiotes. Non? C’est une hoax typicale Francais, non?
I read and enjoyed The Immoralist (L’immoraliste) and Straight is the Gate (La porte étroite) by Gide — in literature classes, usually not much was said about the personal biography of authors, so I did not not learn about Gide’s homosexuality until later.
I guess it’s no surprise Raspail’s Le Camp des Saints was not on Macron’s desk.
Still wrong on everything:
1) If you meant it in this sense, you’re still wrong: there is no evidence the Earth is flat (even if you may think so), while there is overwhelming scientific evidence Brigitte is transgender: http://pressibus.free.fr/gen/trogneux/indexgb.html
2) Yes it does affect vocal cords: https://www.stanfordchildrens.org/en/services/aerodigestive/vocal-cord-medialization-laryngoplasty.html. As does feminization glottoplasty, which directly changes the vibrating length of the vocal cords: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender_voice_therapy#Vocal_surgeries. And we already know Brigitte is Veronique, a transgender woman. So your entire case collapses.
3) You said 15, it was 14. You said it makes no difference, but it does: 15 may have been borderline legal (circumstances to be judged in court), 14 was clearly illegal.
Clueless noobs like you, who have been so easily fooled by the whole Macron operation, are the perfect representation of modern France.
Yet more denial. Her entire transition from Alain Tap to Peki d’Oslo to “Amanda Lear” (amante Dali) is well documented, including her tranvestic phase. But sure go ahead and cite Wikipedia …..
https://twitter.com/Miwa_Sam_/status/1858676180112580966
In that case, 70 % of black women are men.
Good question!
However, you don’t go far enough.
I think everybody should take a DNA test and send the results to everybody else.
Let’s get this settled once and for all!
“they still claim gay men are all boy rapers”
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13752045/Surrey-Pride-LGBT-Stephen-Ireland-child-sex-offence-charges.html
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx28yj34zgpo
The Democrat Party president candidate in 2024 was a whore who fucked and sucked her way to power. There needn’t be one damn thing about this that is prurient.
Who can be certain about anything regarding this person? As Wikipedia states:
I would say Jared Allen.
Is that the consensus?
Stafford number two.
Not almost all, but all conspiracy theories are crap.
The greater the violation from the natural, the greater the control.
Excellent observation, and how true. Michael Hoffman makes this point as well, that the degree of dissonance the masses will accept is used to measure the success of psychological mind control. Ignoring Michelle’s jangling junk is one example of dissonance. Arabs who couldn’t fly a kite one day flying jetliners into precise targets hundreds of miles away the next is another.
I don’t feel worried.
I don’t look up to blacks. I don’t listen to them, watch their films, read their books.
I pity you that you do. Look where it got America. Good luck.
🤡
True, Baron Kaldian, when you got impunity you don’t need to conspire, you just pull off your apical coup of your insubordinate puppet ruler, BLAM BLAM BLAM
https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/available-online
Whatta you gonna do about it?
… there’s a need for those in ‘power’ to be bonded by secrecy in a way only shame can produce. Emmanuel and Barack are both obvious captives… The important take-away is that Emmanuel is not a free agent and likely has never been. He’s playing a role. They all are. Politics will not get us out of this.
I fully agree. I do not talk about the influence of secret societies and occult beliefs, when with people I know, as it sounds too ‘out there’. But once one has researched this, one can see it. And those who campaign and speak out about it tend to meet a grim fate, like Tracey Twyman.
The real problem that make people believe anything is that Macron, who is handsome compared to most politicians has never been seen with a pretty young woman like many other “leaders” would do in his position.
Even if Brigitte is really a woman, and an aged woman that could be his mother, why is it that Macron is not seen with woman of his age as certainly, given his position he could score many of the most attractive women in his entourage?
Even the dwarf Sarkozy had a model as wife.
Even the repulsive Hollande had as a mistress a young pretty journalist (he was over 60).
Macron is seen only with black transsexuals to whom he gives parties in the Elysee Palace, insulting and humiliating France further. Homosexuals and transsexuals plus his old “wife”.
This is all this miserable scumbag shows to the world for sexual partners?
It is obvious for many that Macron is a closet homosexual, probably someone with huge psychological problems used by those who put him in power to control him and that his partner Brigitte is just a diversion.
People have to realize that Macron was never ever elected, both elections were rigged,
– the first one thanks to massive media propaganda (like in the US most french media are owned by Jews), and by using the corrupt French justice system and corrupt judges to remove his main opponent from the race.
– The second one was completely rigged with the ‘interior ministry’ clearly fixing the votes.
It is not unique to France, German has recently eliminated Sara Wagennecht by rigging votes, probably also cheated AfD of few million votes that went to spd & greens, the USA 2020 being a model for all other election fraudsters.
Today they even do worse, they cancel elections when the result doesn’t suit them like in Romania.
Big Mike is as ugly as a mud fence
These freaks aren’t just accidents but deliderate creations who can easily be controlled.
*******************************************************************************
That’s how the illiterate kenyan chimp got to be prez. He’s a faggot married to a tranny freak and that means he is totally controlled by the deep state. Do what we say or else.
“C’est une hoax typicale Francais, non?”
Please don’t try to write anything in what you imagine is French.
Not almost all, but all conspiracy theories are crap.
***************************************************
So you think 9/11 was an accident???!!! The official story on 9/11 is a conspiracy theory.
Look how B sits down, legs wide apart, would any woman ever sit like that?
As far as I know, most mothers have pictures of them with their babies [in most cases just born, or a few weeks or months old].
Personally, I don’t care about these issues, but when the law gets involved, it becomes a jewish thing.
The truth doesn’t need a single law to be true.
A simple picture will kick any theories out there to the curb, and the case is closed…
What?
Photoshop…
Face AI…
Dang, bro!
Life can be sooooo complicated.
Sounds like you have a lot of pet-up anger against the “breeders”…. damn puritans who try to separate gay men from little boys about whom one of them said “if God didn’t want us to love them He wouldn’t have made them so dam’ attractive.”
I like Harold and Maude as counterculture, not as establishment.
Video Link
I don’t think it’s “titilation” it’s disgust at the degenerates and freaks who’ve been placed in positions of power throughout the Western world. It’s the kind of knowledge that might help wake up people who’ve been asleep for a long time.
I have an idea about this theory that I have not seen proposed elsewhere. It is known for the record that around age 11 Elizabeth fell severely ill with some kind of respiratory infection. She was in the care of minor noble couple who lived in the countryside around London in the village of Bisley.
The postulation is that Elizabeth died and was replaced by a local pre-pubescent boy. King Henry VIII barely knew his daughter but the couple feared his rage and so had the boy impersonate Elizabeth during a scheduled royal visit which took place shortly after Elizabeth’s supposed death. What the long term plans were supposed to have been is never discussed. My supposition is that some figures associated with the court were in on it. Maybe they planned to later find a more suitable substitute. In that Henry barely knew his own daughter and might not have recognized her in a public place, this has to be deemed a reasonable idea.
My addition to the theory is that the boy, who is represented as being very bright and arty, took to the role. The highly placed courtiers, seeing a solution to their problem, arranged for some kind of primitive gender reassignment surgery to performed on him. I don’t know if anything like this existed in that era, but if it did, they probably would have had to have brought in a surgeon from Turkey or the Levant to perform it and provide the aftercare protocols. The surgery would have been primitive by our standards, but would have passed a cursory examination, or just call it the eyeball test.
It was not known at that time that Elizabeth would eventually become the queen of England.
The argument in favor of the idea that there was some kind if switch of person that took place is in part grounded in the fact that soon thereafter Elizabeth began to display intellectual and academic talents which there never had been any previous evidence of. As an adult, she never married and never bore children.
I can’t say that I believe this happened. I can’t say it is impossible either. But in a way it makes more sense to believe that there had been a physically similar boy who had been submitted to gender reassignment surgery at or before puberty than it does to believe that a physically similar man could have been found and then have impersonated a slender woman for the entire course of his adolescence and adult life. That’s if you want to believe this theory.
Again, all I can say is that it is possible. But then I like to say, there’s not much you can imagine that hasn’t happened somewhere during the sordid history of human race.
If you live in a town full of transgenders, the idea that Michelle Obama is a man is a big nothing burger. Transgender he-shes are common in modern liberal society because of easy access to hormone gender bending drugs and surgery, so common that even inmates and school children can change sex. Proof that Michelle is a man is easy to find, like this video:
Note how little Bill Gates was friends with the Obama couple way, way, back:
Video Link
The Obamas are a homosexual couple. Michelle is male, she can not have children, so to sell the Obamas as a heterosexual couple, the Obamas borrowed their friends children.
OBAMAS BORROWED THE NESBITT CHILDREN TO PASS OFF AS A HETEROSEXUAL COUPLE
—————-
The Macrons are far more debauched than the Obamas. Like Michelle, Brigitte is a man, but far older, and had a pedophile relationship with Emmanuel when they first met. The evidence points to a more startling discovery – Brigitte is not only a he-she, she is the biological father of Emmanuel.
I stand with Candace Owens, she suggests in her last episode of Becoming Brigitte, that she is the father of Emmanuel. The reader may find this shocking, I do not. The elite are completely sick pedophiles who murder millions, there is nothing they won’t do to hold power. If you are ok with murdering millions in a world war, what’s the big whoop about f-cking your own son in the ass?
https://candaceowens.com/video/becoming-brigitte-the-epilogue/
At first, I ignored this story as it sounds like the sort of thing Chris Hedges has warned of: that as Empires die and become ever more dangerous, the people get distracted w/worthless court intrigues. But I wasa finally worn down by Candace Owens’ series and dipped into the story here and there. I’m not entirely convinced of Poussard’s thesis either, but it did bring to mind the play written by David Henry Hwang, “M. Butterfly,” which was based on the true story of a longtime relationship (18 yrs) between French diplomat, Bernard Boursicot and Beijing opera singer (who was a spy for the Chinese govt), Shi Peipu. Shi had actually convinced Boursicot that he had fathered a child w/”her” that he most definitely did not! Stranger stories do exist.
It’s pseudo masculine, exaggerated. She’s deliberately imitating a masculine look. When she sits down like a man like that, as soon as she sits, she consciously looks out straight at the camera or people; as if to say; do you see me sitting like a man! She’s deliberately expressing her defiance at the patriarchy or some such feminist defiance, and it’s her way of smashing the patriarchy of expectations.
Physically, she IS a type of woman; there are many women of that type. She’s not trans, just a type. Having long gangly arms and legs and big hands does not make her manly. But a type, Olive Oyl, Julia Child, a type of feminine, but B uses that same body type to express a masculine body language. Though it’s not so clear cut that it’s always deliberate even for her, as people with that body type will have an awkwardness about their movements because they are so gangly.
In the picture of her when younger, in that blue dress with her arms crossed. she looks soft and feminine pretty. In spite of her large arms. Her skin or face got coarser as he got older, but calling her a man is ridiculous, a podcasters’ marketing scheme.
In the case of Kamala Harris it was certainly more than prurient interest
since she was clearly lacking the intellect to be the California AG,
a Senator and a Vice President. I can’t imagine that she actually passed
the Bar Exam.
In many other instances though, the public had no need to be aware of
the peccadillos of politicians since their public service was not affected
by their sexual “indiscretions.” Senator Hart may have made an excellent
President except for the hit job featuring him on a boat with his girlfriend.
“Sex sells” but it also destroys the reputations of good people.
There are ideas here I can’t endorse. But one thing I do believe is that when people presents themselves as too perfect, it may often be the case that they have some things to hide, or call it things they don;t want you to know.
As an aside, I want to bring up Gov. Gavin Newsom of California. He is one of those types who tries to keep a perfect image in public. I’m not sure he really has so much to hide though. He is just an ordinary narcissist and not very competent. That’s my point. Not everyone who maintains an image of perfection is hiding some great secret. Many are just ordinary self-aborbed guys and gals who can afford to do it and some might even be just people who think it’s what they’re supposed to do given their position and means.
Nevertheless, when you see too perfect in an individual, it’s a flag.
So Mrs Farmer has nothing better to do with her brain than root around in the tawdry speculations of others interpersonal relationships.
A Grand Catholic — a guess the preist forgot to mention that gossiping is a no no.
This film is complete tripe. Not only is it pervy, boring and features the intolerable music of Cat Stevens (the only good thing he ever did was call for the death of Salman Rushdie. How much better off we would all have been if he had carried out the act himself), the big reveal is that Maude has a ‘holocaust tattoo’. So not only is this ugly old bag a cradle snatcher, she is a sinister lying yenta. This film should be banned and everyone involved with it should be either brutalised or dug up and posthumously hanged.
Everyone can see that there is something wrong with Macron. But if you think of him as an ‘actor’, this could all be part of the ‘persona’. We dont know much about these people.
The J conspiracy is the only one worth focusing on. – Greg Johnson
One can only afford to be a crank on one issue. – Jared Taylor
No, Michelle Obama is not a man and those who have chosen to believe such tripe, for years on end, and often with evidence provided to them otherwise, are complete morons.
I guess that’s a clear enough answer to your question.
So much time is wasted on this dreck. But, I suppose it is informative in showing just how gullible plenty of humanity still is — even with the internet sitting there ready for research on these dippy topics. But, many still don’t know how to keyword search effectively.
No wonder so many millions were easily convinced to take experimental injections for a jacked-up flu they could have beat on their own if acquired. Smh…
Agreed. But, she’s soon to have four kids to support and as long as internet gossiping pays, she’ll probably keep doing it.
While she also trashes feminists but, basically lives the life of one. So many hypocritical crackpots these days.
Oh cripes, another gullible dupe. ^^^
So, I guess Serena Williams (whose physique makes Michelle’s seem downright feminine!) didn’t actually birth her babies? Because her body is so large and muscular, she must be a tranny?
There are lots more big girls athletes like Serena also. You must live in a cave.
Yes, there is a cave and its chock full of stupid Americans and Europeans.
“Sir Ena” and “Venus” (check the rhyme) Williams are indeed trannies, two of the more obvious ones. Steffi “Graf” (Graf means “Count” in German) is an easy one to spot as well. Google “her” bikini photos. Check out this video of the Williams brothers as children:
Video Link
Mr. E had a great video showing how all the early female tennis champions were obvious men. The surgery wasn’t as good back then (harder to remove the Adam’s apple), so it was even easier to see. Unfortunately the video has been scrubbed from the Internet.
You can’t be certain, for sure. Can you be certain I’m a man? No. The point is that it is still a rumor, and that Amanda Lear testified repeatedly that it is just a rumor. The rumor was made up to launch her career, and it worked. That’s the only thing we know. The rest is rumor. All these documents circulating are most probably fake.
cognitive bias
Yes, everything has become an experiment with the masses as the subject. What was once theoretical speculation one would study at university has become quantitatively guaged and assessed in real life, to be, often, almost immediately used in real situations by these modern revolutionary practitioners. Trouble is for the masses of our people is that the conspiracy is against us because we are their main enemy.
In parallel with this, if one studied the chemistry and biochemistry of DNA decades ago it had the same rather void applicational (!) status as the psychological/sociological semi sciences. Today it too “delivers” and so much so that the moral fabric that more or less guided us for centuries is deeply challenged.
In the “science” of Economics, the same applies, no matter how thin the models used reflect reality.
This is what the Nazi soldiers are fighting and dying for!
I agree with just about all you’ve said.
Actually I’d be pretty sure that she’s a central part of the control of Macron. Expose that true relationship in the right and timely way and with a fresh set-up candidate and he’s gone.
They use us to destroy us.
How Talmudic can they get…
That bloody Google Translate can work wonders, even with the likes of one from the Antipodes.
So why not use it?
By this alternative, Observator’s French pretension is rendered thus…
N’est-ce pas un canular typiquement français ?
How good is that!
Absurd theatre, very amusing to read. Above all, the idea that France’s First Lady is an 80-year-old tranny sounds like the template for a very French film.
Laughin’ as always.
But it’s pent-up.
But – as painfully ineffectual Pommies today would say – to be honiiiiist I don’t know where ‘pent’ comes from, albeit that that’s the correct word in the expression you chose.
As I recall, the little princess reportedly was fluent in french at an early age and her mother made sure she learned latin as well, besides reading and writing in a neat hand. I don’t know why everybody is so obsessed with gender bending.
Generally, sexual dimorphism is lower in Blacks than in other races — simply stated, looking at black men and black women, on average black women tend to be perceived as more masculine in appearance than women of other races are when compared to men of the same race.
Related is relatively ranking and comparing men and women of different races on a kind of absolute scale of masculinity and femininity, respectively — e.g. Asian men are generally seen as low in masculinity, while Asian women are seen as high in femininity (i.e. Asians are sort of the opposite of Blacks in this regard) — you see this dynamic play out when dating or ‘hook up’ sites post their anonymized data on client interactions.
Masculinity and Femininity by Racial Identification: Racialized Differences in Responses to Self-Rated Gender Scales for Cisgender Men and Women
We appear to see things the same way. I think Mr. E is quite correct that unclean spirits are using these mutilated bodies as vessels, but like you I am not a Christian and cannot follow him there. Somehow in his case it doesn’t put me off as it does with most evangelizers. He seems like basically an open-minded person with a good heart and a good sense of humor, which is always the sign of a fine soul.
Mr. M, although possessing a keen sense of irony, is a little too arrogant to be really funny. I hope you are correct that he simply has his blind spots like everyone else. I’ve certainly learned a lot from him, and I’m grateful to anyone who can teach me something.
Regarding Bjerknes, he’s the best source out there for Kabbala decoding. He backs everything up with (incredible) arcane textual sources. He has his own set of blind spots: he is a scientific materialist who refuses to entertain the hypothesis that the black magic practiced by the Kabbalists is anything but superstitious delusion. I think he’s wrong. Still, in my opinion, his research is absolutely indispensable for anyone trying to figure out the big picture. His decodes of “The Matrix” and “2001” are particularly excellent. His website is called “CJB Books”.
Quite the opposite actually: Lear never “testified” (she simply tried to deny it), the many documents and photos are clearly authentic (never shown to be fake), and the rumor she was trans didn’t launch her career but almost ended it.
More correctly, Lear invented many rumours to obscure the past.
If other very famous people who pass as the opposite to their actual sex, like April Ashley and Romy Haag, among several others, state that they recall working with or employing the pre-Lear Lear as a dancer, why not take them at their word?
The David Bowie and Rocky Horror tales that you cite from French Wikipedia are both quite recent. One would assume both to have been Lear’s own confections.
The article below doesn’t state even half of Lear’s fabric of lies, but has some details.
https://zagria.blogspot.com/2008/07/amanda-lear-1939-performer.html?m=1
The Williams sisters have probably taken plenty of androgens, and I wouldn’t be surprised if Michelle has taken them also. With that musculature she is clearly descended from the slaves bred for field work.
Michelle Obama may be a fairly strong example of a virago, rather than a man dressed as a woman.
It’s looks like an Earth flat distraction typo. Completely irrelevant, even for the French.
Only if there is some pedophilial secretive gang working throught this peculiar couple… But for me she is just a not conventionally attractive old woman in a lavender marriage.
What is the point a supposed transgender Women (Michelle and Brigitte) in Power or associated with, hide their “trans identity” to the public??? Would be better if they are transparent about it??? Same thing to supposed homossexuality of Obama and Macron.
Anyway, again, how knowing the truth about it will help White advocacy???
Her relationship with Thomas Seymour suggests she must have been an attractive girl at some point. However, it seems that Henry VIII’s offspring were all suffering from genetic conditions or syndromes. Elizabeth was certainly a freak, however, her mother was born of a very intelligent family. Considering her ancestry on both sides, her talent is not surprising.
80 years old???? S/he looks very good for her age… If
The whole “transgender” thing is a form of ritual mockery of the population. Sort of like Michelle Obama standing on a Seine Barge with a wine glass reflecting the fire of Notre Dame. Just a coincidence?
Either way, whether they are males pretending to be females or whether this whole mass hysteria was deliberately whipped up to ridicule conspiracists, the object is the same, the ritual humiliation of the population.
I think they were surprised at the success of the Obama campaign, these freaks went hogwild. The trans thing is a jewish/occult thing. The owners of the Hyatt chain, the Pritzkers are into pretending to be female. At least one of them is.
J’aime bien Guyénot ( et ce site ) , c’est pour çà que je vais consentir à mettre les pieds dans cette merde. Personne n’étant flic ou magistrat chargé de découvrir officiellement la vérité , il s’agit donc ici simplement d’information ou de désinformation du public…et du business lié au “journalisme” et à l’édition. Je n’ai pas lu ( ni acheté surtout ) le bouquin de XP mais j’ai écouté ses interviews et le show de Mme Candace Owens , c’est du fastfood ( vite lu , vite consommé et fait pour rapporter un max.) . Ceci dit on ne peut rien leur reprocher , ils font leur job. Point ! Concernant le “couple” Macron , bien sûr que c’est un couple d’homos. , que “Brigitte” est un homme ! Des milliers de personnes sont au courant , pas seulement la “faune” habituelle mais aussi les services officiels , l’ensemble des chancelleries , de nombreux Médecins…etc , etc ! Le contre-feu de l’Elysée , les mensonges familiaux…dans ce contexte c’est du bricolage ( Mitterrand lui avait été plus expéditif semble t’il ? ) , çà ne vaut pas la peine de disserter là dessus ! Je pense que XP a été “renseigné” par un copain qui occupe ou occupait un poste officiel et qu’il a ensuite cherché une “combine” pour publier là dessus , c’est son boulot , sans se faire rattraper par la patrouille ! Son enquête est médiocre , limitée par les moyens , c’est une construction intellectuelle bancale ( dont le rendement financier par contre est excellent…). Pour terminer : je ne sais pas si on peut parler véritablement d’un complot ( ce n’est pas le 11/9 ), c’est un fait divers paillard ou sordide à la tête de l’Etat d’un pays en pleine déconfiture . Ce que je sais par contre, c’est que n’importe quel flic s’il en reçoit l’ordre démêlera cette farce en très peu de temps ! Ca arrivera probablement , il paraît que l’ADN de “Brigitte” se balade déjà dans la nature…Ce qui me paraît plus important surtout c’est de savoir si cette “affaire” à une incidence sur la “politique” menée par Macron…? ( moi , mais c’est un avis perso , je pense que oui…)
I’m not debating about trans histeria but about this particular situation. Would not be better for trans agenda if they show transpeople in power than hide them? That’s why this doesnt make sense to me.
It’s important insomuch as it’s more evidence of how they literally lie about everything, and how they mock you and your sensibilities. It’s also a demonstration by those “in the know” of how guess, moronic, and cattlelike the rest of humanity is.
Assuming it’s true, of course
They do what they want, not my problem. But it would cost them less than to hire american lawyers to try to frighten Candace.
Sounds like that Amanda was a real freak. No wonder Lear was favoured by other freaks and perverts in the arts and music community. Must have been extremely promiscuous. London in the swinging 60s must have just been waiting for someone like that to hit the scene. Married long-term to a raving homosexual. No kids, eh? No abortions?
agree. “dusty” commenter spells it out in another comment- the reveal of baphomet (tranny) religion is only allowed to the ancient ’empire that never dies’; this piece ‘reveals’ that the author is yet again another mouthpiece for the controlled info of those secret masters of old.
yet again: “carthago delenda est”. the earth was salted, yet again they return.
Thanks for the website; the disbelief of the masses in the spiritual wars keeps them in thrall to the possessed puppets in power over them. “The empire that never died” as T. Beale refers to “them”, has returned to public view; their slaves worshiping Baphomet and begging priests to throw their children into the fiery mouth of Ba’al.
Don’t be so harsh. I have no doubt that ‘Amanda Lear’ was born a man, and had many steps to becoming Amanda Lear.
Some of the Euridisco tracks are pretty good, even the ‘Amanda Lear’ mythology as a whole, well crafted.
Her entry into Dali’s menagerie was a great move. A big advance from being just a tranny cabaret dancer.
I once met a man who had been part of the Dali menagerie long after ‘Amanda Lear’, only a few years before Dali’s death, he was quite pleasant in conversation. Never mentioned Amanda Lear. Same with David Bowie, although I doubt such a quote exists, unless offhand.
Of course, Lear had an association with Brian Ferry, Lear looks very glamorous on that record cover, but it is no proof of an affair with Ferry, and no account except Lear’s own makes the connection.
Same with Lear’s rumour about ‘I had a tumultuous affair with Brian Jones of the Rolling Stones’, it is nonsense. All of that is much before my time, but I read a few of the books, two about the death of Jones. one by the chief of road crew of Rolling Stones, Lear is never mentioned in either.
TKK (aka The Khazarian Kike) writes:
I don’t care what your skin colour is, or your race/religion.
If you’re speaking the truth, if you’re exposing who perpetrated 9/11, killed JFK/RFK/JFK Jr, exposing the fraud of the Holohoax, who orchestrated the Covid Psyop and the Mass Cull of humanity through the rollout of the clot shots, the Ukraine proxy war, the mass murder of the Palestinians etc, then YOU ARE ON MY TEAM.
But you Mr Khazarian Kike, you are in opposition to my team.
I’ve never once heard you speaking truth on the 9/11 False Flag, the JFK assassination, criticising the perpetrators of the Gaza genocide (not to mention the 77 years of oppression that occurred since the Nakba – in fact beginning even earlier than that).
You’ve made no attempt to do the right thing in relation to all these events.
You sir, are a gutless Jew and a COWARD.
Meanwhile, here is a 5 min video featuring another despicable Jew (Shmuley Boteach), as he’s confronted by a righteous Jew (Aaron Maté) – the latter being someone whose hand I’d shake and would be chuffed to have on ‘my side’:
Video Link
The Jewish Max Blumenthal (co-host at the Grayzone) is also a Champion of Truth who I’d gladly team up with any day of the week.
TKK, why can’t you be a righteous Jew (like the aforementioned – and Ron Unz)?
Would that be so difficult? Instead you choose to remain a snivelling wretch, grovelling in front of your Talmudic overlords that deliver so much death and despair to humanity – instead of calling them out.
You are a worthless piece of it.
They can get a huge settlement if they send Candace a cease and desist or we will sue you letter. Then if Candace continues they can sue her and prove Brigette’s a real woman With a taped physical with closeups a narration and some approved by both sides neutral observers in the room
Then the DNA results samples sent to two experts plaintiff Macron’s and Owen’s respondents
Get a mostly women jury they will know what they’re looking at And should be more sympathetic to the defamation of Brigette probably? Or lawsuits in France America even the UK. Her defamation occurred in Tennessee. Socially conservative state black women on the jury? I dunno they hate pretty MARRIED black women as much as they hate White women Generations of no marriage blacks
It can keep unz.com entertained for years.
Husband Farmer’s family area supposedly billionaires the British Way all hidden from the tax man overseas bank accounts . Candace Owens et al. Go after spouse in-laws her channel everyone works with her everyone whose claims about Brigette she cited.
It will be fun to watch and read about.
Candace might claim the DNA results are faked
AHA!!! ER one was a eunuch. Explains why his maids and ladies never saw whiskers. Women didn’t wear under pants in those days. It would have to be a three way operation because princesses had no privacy in those days.
perhaps you should do a little research into the subject before calling the covid 19 bioweapon, a jacked up flu. if you were to do so, you would find that ralph baric (working for darpa and the nih) holds a 2015 patent, that exactly describes covid. using this patent they made billions of dollars creating a vaccine that wasn’t a vaccine, that could never have passed safety trials, without an emergency use exclusion.
they killed over 10 million people and sicken hundreds of millions with both their bioweapon and the novel “vaccine”, that is now causing early onset aggressive cancers among younger people, after having taken out an untold number of boomers.
so you see, there’s a little more to it than you know. sorry i offended you with my joke, i didn’t know you were michelle’s gynecologist.
https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2015143335A1/tr
No breasts.
That video of yours from 1990 (or 1991) also featured a potential future talent in the shape of 15 year old Marion Jones.
I was at the Sydney Olympic Games 100 metre Womens final and saw her take the gold.
It was later taken away from her after it was determined that she was doped up on something (just like Flo-Jo was in 1988).
At the end of the day, there are so many drugs out there that will give you masculine performance or, in reverse, will ‘feminise’ men (coupled to surgical enhancement).
Meanwhile, for the benefit of the fool ‘Unreal World’ in comment # 148, here’s a little reminder of what Big Mike looked like (before the feminisation* took place), in the early days of his courtship with Obama:
(*Well, there is only so much feminisation you can do on a burly bloke like Big Mike).
Still not satisfied? Here’s Big Mike decked out for a State dinner:
Meanwhile Laurent Guyenot, I’ve liked reading your stuff (other than what you had to say about that obvious Jewish liar Half-baked Ace Baker and his juvenile 9/11 hypothesis), for a long time. But PLEEEEASE, do not conflate Big Mike and Obama with Macron and his older man.
There is NO QUESTION that Big Mike packs a long shlong.
Meanwhile, I couldn’t help myself. Here’s one more photo as Big Mike gives Obama a manly bear hug:
Laurent, whether you buy Owens’/Poussard’s argument or come up with your counter-refutation, the issue remains moot. So, please explain why is it that, considering the huge controversy surrounding her gender, Brigitte has never provided any irrefutable proof beyond doubt as to what gender she is?
She obviously HAS something to hide, whether that be about herself or her husband.
I’m not advocating for the theory. I’m only arguing that it might have been possible for something like that to happen.
Her talent and education is not incomprehensible. What has been noted is that there seemed to be a sudden increase in her level of intellectual interest and ability beyond what might be considered normal for a capable aristocratic spawn of that era.
Another thing that has just occurred to me is that in the course of her illness, she may have had a near death experience. I have seen it reported that individuals who have had near death experiences something later experience a considerable increase in their level of intellectual ability. This is as good an explanation as the other one (the Bisley boy substitution theory) and overall far more likely, come to think of it. We do know that Elizabeth was severely ill to the point that her guardians feared that she would die. We don’t know that she did die and was substituted for by any other person of whatever description.
When dynastic or high state interests are involved, don’t rule anything out though. There’s a lot at stake for the players and this means that there a lot of things that they might do to make thing come out the way they want to be.
This is more entertaining and doesn’t detract from Macron being a train wreck.
Video Link
They dont live about every thing. Conservatives also lies a lot. People in power, lies more than when they are among underdogs. That’s why conservatives are lying less than liberals today. Liberals are very right about Palestine situation and the conservatives who are in the side of Israel are just pathetic. In the end, Palestinians and Native Whites in Europe and their diaspora worldwide are in the same side… Pathetic is even a soft way to describe them. Liberals are also more right about capitalism and how wrong it tend to be. Funny enough, capitalism is exactly the system where your biggest enemies florish… Cohencidence a regime where money is everything, those who are culturally adapted to “make money”, as much as possible, are the most succcesfull??
I don’t know if Brigitte or Michele are men or women. They present themselves as women so I assume they are women.
If they are actually men then how far have they transitioned to female? Do they only wear dresses and makeup and falsies or have they transitioned partly or even fully. By partly they keep their male genitalia and take female hormones or have breast implants. Examples of these would be “Shemales”.
Or maybe they fully transitioned by having surgical procedures that removed the male genitalia and created a female vagina. Who knows! We can only know by close physical inspection, DNA and doctors documents.
I actually knew two Trans females (Males that presented as female). One dressed somewhat female, lipstick etc, but on closed inspection you could tell that something just wasn’t right. Even strangers looked at him/she in a rather puzzled fashion. The other was very feminine and from far away (six feet or so) he/she passes as female. From close up there was a tell tale sign of facial shaving. He/she wore a very nice dress, hair makeup, lipstick and could fool most people. I didn’t notice the Adam’s apple (The Adam’s apple is a visible bump in the front of the neck, formed by the thyroid cartilage surrounding the larynx, and is typically more prominent in men. It helps protect the vocal cords and is associated with the deepening of the voice during puberty) or hip/waist size. I don’t usually question people’s presentation unless I’m personally involved.
There are a few females that look masculine. One example would be the Williams tennis sisters.
Final verdict I don’t know and I don’t care. Maybe some one could produce some nude photos of Brigitte or Michele. Heck there is even a nude photo of the former German prime minister Angela Merkel floating in the internet. The Paparazzi are nowhere to be seen or interested?
You’ve known far, FAR more than that.
The two you recognized probably weren’t castrated.
Good points, Lauren. And it only matters to me in that ALL politicians have been ensnared by blackmail, I suspect. Otherwise they wouldn’t be enacting these policies so clearly against their country’s interest.
What I was suggesting is that if the Bisley boy theory is valid (I’m not saying it is) is that perhaps the boy who replaced her then had some kind of primitive gender reassignment surgery. I postulated that this was something that perhaps was known in Turkey or the Levant (aka the Islamic world) but not in Europe. Yes, eunuch or castrati by the definition of those terms.
There are other possibilities. I suggested perhaps young Elizabeth had a near death experience. This is something that could account also for the reported increase in her intellectual faculties following her illness.
I think I read somewhere years ago from some of those Dali hangers on that he used to like holding court over sex orgies by these admirers, without taking part himself, kind of like Rajneesh used to do. I have nothing against rock stars behaving like rock stars. They were so wasted most of the time that they probably don’t remember who had sex with whom. Casual sex was the norm.That’s why they called it the swinging 60s, and they say that if you remember it you weren’t there, because everyone was out of their heads.
Any of the theories and variants regarding “Brigitte Macron” is easier to believe than the official version: a 15-year-old boy fell in love with his married, mother-of-three, 40-year-old teacher and their fairy-tale romance has lasted to this day, even as that sensitive, romantic boy rose to be the WEF-endorsed president of a major country.
I don’t have all the answers, but Macron and his “wife” are part of the pedophiliac Satanic cabal that rules “the West”. Seen from that perspective, everything becomes plausible, including the self-proclaimed “young Jupiter” marrying his father. Could he, like the classic Jupiter’s father have castrated his own father, who is none other than “Brigitte Macron”? Perhaps not, but, again, it’s still more plausible than the official story.
You may be right. In the real world itz difficult to conduct an inspection. I recall a long, long time ago where I attempted to do physical inspections and was instantly slapped in the face, WTF.
Some of my dates actually said that if I tried that again they would call their father or big brother. Anyway you can’t/don’t want to buy the cow if the physical inspection fails. Maybe there are instances where a man buys a wife and discovers that all is not kosher. The reason I say “buy” is because there are very few instances where a woman marries a man who is poor.
In this new world I would advise men to do full inspections before signing on the dotted line.
“The two you recognized probably weren’t castrated”
Itz difficult to say as one was in a relationship with a man and the other was involved with a female. The female said that the only difference was that she used to date a man and now she’s dating a woman WTF!
I couldn’t agree with your statements more.
It’s completely relevant, as is the Big Mitch Question, because it gives a valuable insight into the nature of the global “elite”.
The only two ways somebody would claim this is irrelevant are:
A) A complete lack of understanding and imagination on the part of the claimer
B) The claimer is the type of faggot who avers that “transgender” is normal and that whether someone is “trans” is a “private matter” because “trans women” are “indistinguishable from other women”
Which of those are you?
Barack Obama on at least one occasion publically referred to his spouse as Michael rather than Michelle. Freudian slip, perhaps?
Regular fag loves a gossip, didnt you know??
No. If this conspiracy “theory” is true, still not relevant enough to rational men to care too much about. If Brigitte had a baguette, but Macron was a really good politician, and not the puppet he is, i would care even less.
Whatever the answer, the Big Mike case may be used to hone our epistemological skills. How do we achieve certainty on topics which the powers that be do not want us to know about? Or worse yet, they want us to know while still retaining plausible deniability so the incriminating facts cannot be used against them. The individual pieces of evidence for the theory of transvestite Big Mike are suggestive and sometimes persuasive, but never quite compelling (at least for me). However, given the overall cluster of related information is it possible to reach a solid conclusion? Are the gaps in the theory small enough to be overwhelmed by the evidence or are we left with a few strange observations and a story with a bunch of holes?
If a relatively minor lie is embedded in a big lie, does identifying the big lie give support to the theory of the minor lie? This is similar to the notion that the fruit of the tainted tree is all tainted. In other words, does the obvious fact that Obama was a manufactured candidate (the big lie is that he was a black superstar from Harvard Law) add credence to the theory that he is gay (as widely believed) and therefore his family is somewhat of a beard which is part of the smaller lie? If this beard theory is determined to be true does it then lend support to the theory that Big Mike is simply a poorly disguised man dressing as a woman?
[I think Big Mike is a man, but I only put the probability at 75%. I think the Floyd mess was staged, probability 99%.]
You segued into an analogy made, the topic was the looney M.O. as male meme.
My point was valid, that millions were so naive and gullible they ran out and took experimental injections. Those I asked didn’t even request to see the pharma mfg drug disclaimer which revealed plenty. So, sure, a couple of manipulated photos/videos, the power of suggestion and lots of brainless online comments caused heaps of people to believe a M.O.fabrication. Both easy and ridiculous.
For the record, I had the original Covid strain and it kicked the living shit out of me. I didn’t fully recover for 8 MONTHS. In truth, I never really have because I now am ridiculously susceptible to colds/flues/respiratory problems. I also am very sensitive to Covid vax shedding which drives me up the wall b/c I can’t know who has taken more of those in the last 12 months or so. They should be required to have their foreheads stamped with an emblem so I can avoid them.
You’re preaching to the choir about Covid. But, deaths in the USA were few from that illness. It was the distorted way they counted deaths that pumped the fraudulent numbers plus those that were willfully killed in hospitals with lethal Covid treatment ‘protocols’.
Eugène Ionesco (who wrote the immortal “La Cantatrice Chauve”) would have done this brilliantly.
Your video clip is proof of nothing. WTH?
Also, I looked up photos of Steffi Graf in a bikini on an image search engine and, guess what? I had a female roommate in college whose body was almost identical to Graf’s. I’ve since then seen plenty of other women with a physique like hers.
But, I do think you’ll appreciate my very fine bridge collection and I’m ready to sell a couple of them. Good prices!
So, I guess Serena Williams (whose physique makes Michelle’s seem downright feminine!) didn’t actually birth her babies? Because her body is so large and muscular, she must be a tranny?
*********************************************************************
good chance serena is a man. Makes a lot of financial sense to take one of your male kids and raise him as a girl so he can compete as a female and make a fortune for the family. Blacks will do anything for a buck. THINK
I’m agnostic too but if it’s not true. it should be.
Sigh, this video was produced while she was FLOTUS as part of her nutrition and exercise push (before all this lunacy started).
It is all the evidence I ever needed to know that she is female. Just watch the first 50 seconds and there will be numerous vantage points that make obvious there is NO MALE JUNK in those leotards.
I’ve posted that video clip numerous times on another website of readers who fancy themselves intelligent — and they either ran away, embarrassed no doubt, or continued to attest she has male equipment when she clearly doesn’t.
Also, that stupid photo that had gone around ad infinitum of her in a green/blue dress with the most absurd looking bulge (so fake) can be easily searched online…where any sane person doing so will see many other photographs of her in that dress at the same event (taken by media outlets) and there is ….nothing there! Here, have at it….lots of images of her in that dress at that event. Where is the junk? https://tinyurl.com/36a6h4mw
Serious question: why are so many adults of mature age so retarded? Simple searches prove all this. Smh!
If Brigitte is not Jean-Michel, where is Jean-Michel?
Laurent is supporting the
MandchurianRothschild candidate. Isn’t it funny for a conspiracy theorist (strange as I was about to write terrorist…) who sees Israel and the Mossad behind JFK assassination and the 911?He shows a very poor knowledge of the current “dossier”.
By the way, the conspiracy was to put Macron where he is now. But this real conspiracy gets not attention from Laurent.
It is evidence that he has a very poor understanding of the case, if any at all.
Your heroes the Kennedys were two of the very worst race traitor anti White pro Jewish and pro anti White Jew programs in America you brainwashed zombie lunatic.
As well as being a brainwashed fan of the Kennedys you’re a fan of the Kardiashians Angelina and her kids . Probably rushed home from school to join your grandma watching Oprah.
Laurent believes the Gregorian calendar we use today was developed some unknown time between 400 and 600 AD not 1582 AD
Thank you so very much . My woke progressive liberal lunatic sister and husband met Michelle . Sister claims Michelle is beautiful and has the most lovely smile. My sister would say that. This is before the tranny rumors began.
You should THINK…perhaps for the first time in your life.
But, it won’t happen. You’re one of the crazed, off-the-deep-end types who keeps chugging the phony propaganda long after people have written you off.
I guess the world needs that type too – the dupes. Got to be able to unload fake Rolexes, swamp land in “paradise” and untold other junk off on somebody.
In this day and age, Just Do a DNA Test ….and do it publically.
In this day and age, with lying media, with deep fakes, with AI and Robots, with amazing makeup that transforms, and with all kinds of hormone “treatments”…
“Just Do A DNA Test” is a bumper sticker.
Would need observers and observers for the chain of evidence with observes all along the way. Even then many will claim the test was faked and another DNA sample was substituted.
He is a Rothchild banker, in sum, a USian. A hustler, huckster, USA-in style.
Bought and owned.
Undoubtedly!
This video has been posted at Unz. The “transvestigators” would simply say “tuck and tape” which is apparently a standard way transvestites hide their male genitalia. With the fuzzy image I don’t have an opinion on this clip. Over time videos are altered by people in both camps, usually with deceptive editing. Sometimes the most damning video is simply memory holed. I think for this controversy the most persuasive video was dancing on the Ellen show. I saw different versions. The original one seemed to show an appendage flopping around in Michelle’s crotch area in some the moves. Was this a tuck and tape wardrobe failure? If not, did any women step up to point out what else might be going on? Something like, “Yeah, I sometimes attach a rabbit’s foot to the front of my panties for good luck.”
The most interesting piece of information in this topic are the Joan River’s quote and the two times Barak referred to his wife as Mike/Michael on camera. All three of these utterances seem completely sincere in the sense the speakers are not good enough actors to fake it. Combined with Michelle’s substantial size and general physique they lead to an interesting theory. Nothing more but nothing less.
This cheeky video you posted shows a fairly feminine looking person except for the face and voice. The shot and voiceover at 0:35 is the cheeky part. LOL.
Verdun used to be a center of the eunuch industry; not to mention the Romans
already knew various kinds (depending on the intended use) and had
manageable mortality rates.
At the very least she is an obvious beard as Macron is one of the most obviously homosexual male creatures ever to have had eyes laid upon.
This is the pervert whole welcomes every single African “migrant” (read: illegal alien) with a blow job and free parking in his rectum.
In this day and age, Just Do a DNA Test ….and do it publically.
***************************************************************
Won’t work. The so-called “experts” will say whatever they are paid to say.
Pretty sure that if the Brigitte is a man theory could be blamed on Israel that you would be all up in da house supporting it. And BTW, I watched Candace Owens series. It’s far more rational and fact based than your contempt laden and lazy shade piece.
Any White gentile who support inconditionally israel (and then jewish gang) is a pathetic clown…
O-M-G!
Every time I think I can no longer be surprised at the irrationality and deep obtuseness of some people — someone surprises me with even more.
You should be embarrassed by your post but, likely don’t even understand why. It evidences the thinking and rationale of a child. There is no reasoning with the deluded.
Well, you can’t claim no one tried to wake you from your stupor. Adios….
What I was postulating specifically was some form of gender-reassignment surgery which would pass a cursory examination, in other words, the eyeball test.
.
The near-death-experience idea is not a fantasy. If her guardians (Thomas Parry and Lady Kat Ashley) had a fear of King Henry’s rage, it would have been because Elizabeth was severely ill and at risk of death, not just ill with an ordinary cold or a case of the flu. I have seen it reported that one of the possible effects when a child or young person has a near-death-experience is that their level of intelligence may greatly. Reportedly, Elizabeth, after her illness at the age of 10, became suddenly much more intellectually talented and academically able than she had been previously.
English aristocrats in that era learned French and it was considered particularly important that girls become well-versed in French so that they would be able to converse in that language as young adult women. Another source said that she had already studied Latin as well before her illness. This was not unusual either given that she was a high aristocrat. The point, however, is that she allegedly manifested a greater level of intellectual ability after her illness than she had been known to have already.
You really have three possibilities under my argument. Elizabeth died and was replaced, possibly by a pre-pubescent boy who resembled her. If a boy, then possibly he later underwent some form of gender reassignment surgery.
Elizabeth had a near-death-experience during the course of her illness and manifested certain personality and intellectual changes thereafter.
Elizabeth got sick, recovered, and was an unchanged person. She then got more interested in education as she got older.
I had not heard of there being eunuchs in early modern Europe other than the castrati singers, so I assumed surgical expertise would have to have been brought in from outside through aristocratic connections, from a place where it was known to exist. Not disputing you, but can you name a source?
My recurrent thought is, there is little you can imagine that hasn’t happened somewhere.
Twenty years ago I might have agreed with you. The internet has exposed too many outrageous government-related activities to reject things out of hand. The people in power lie about EVERYTHING. Can you think of something along the lines of a conspiracy which you once thought was profoundly impossible and then turned out to be demonstrably true? No need to answer, it is a rhetorical question and hopefully the answer is yes.
As I said, the Big Mike case is not conclusive and I think I gave it 75%. It is a weird and farcical topic, so maybe I give it a bit too much credence since it is funny. I used to discount all of these “tranny outings”, but it is now clear to me that there is a niche industry around these people which has existed for a long time.
Stay frosty.
Many people in this world will do anything for a buck. It’s pretty easy to money your irreducible in place of the transcendent. Values bave to come from an irreduciible, one way or the other. You cannot make a study of what people do the basis for your values.
i’ve had multiple variants, with different types of symptoms and now have eternal covid. that’s all part of this vicious bio-weapon, that is specifically designed to do just that. that’s the bat spike protein, practically impossible to get rid of once it’s worked it’s way in.
i rufused to accept their novel technology genetic engineering experiment, as i knew immediately it was a bio-weapon and that’s how i found unz, merely by googling covid 19 bioweapon, unz came up first on the search in those early days. ron was one of the first, other than a few chinese sites, to describe it as such. i never understood why ron could see the obvious connection but was less than accepting of this “vaccine”, as the horrible war crime, that it is as well.
i had auto-immune issues to start with and all of my symptoms have become exponentially worse, this is many things but it is a boomer remover, first and foremost. i personally know about a dozen older friends that died after taking the clot shot, from heart attacks and reoccurring cancers. i know a person who’s healthy 29 yo stepson, fell into a coma after his third shot.
this is the greatest war crime of all time, and we haven’t seen the end of it yet. we’ll never know the true number of deaths because people are dying of early onset cancers and pulmonary diseases, as well as reoccurring cancers and illness they had beaten in the past, none of these are attributed to the “vaccine” or covid. i wish you well in your recovery. this is a far more important subject, than whether michelle and bridgette have dicks, which is why i was making fun of it, in the first place.
Tuck and tape does have its adherents.
Sorry, but Mrs. Macron looks more feminine than the woman in purple. The lady in purple looks more like a tranny than Brigitte.
There are plenty of manly looking women, these would appeal to guys who are attracted to men as well, like Emmanuel or Barry.
The tranny thing is a silly distraction.
I’m sure that if Elizabeth really died her guardians could have found a red headed girl with the sane color eyes. rather than a boy substitute. 10,11 by then kids read at adult level and if they’re intelligent and studious they really soar. Her half siblings were very intelligent so was their father.
At that time I doubt Henry would have cared if both his daughters died. He did send Thomas Howard Duke of Norfolk to threaten Mary with death. Anne Boleyn’s alleged crimes against Henry were far worse than Catherine’s miscarriages it would make a great movie though
I do not catalogue my useless knowledge, sorry (others turn it into a book 😁)
Alistair Horne (“The Price of Glory“) mentions it in passing as Verdun´s only
claim to fame (to be replaced by candied almonds) before the battle, and I seem to
remember another center in present Czechia. My point was the surgery has been an
integral part of the slave trade for a looong time
(inhowfar the expertise was Jewish I´m unable to say but wouldn´t be surprised)
and Europe was much less isolated than we´d like to think.
Yes, many WASPs- USian girls look like HR ladies. Frumpy, non feminine, obese, etc. The USA-in look.
The first thing that comes to mind, though, is that Carlson is deeply critical of neoconservative foreign policy and essentially wishes to create a more isolationistic United States. It is even the case that Carlson actively criticizes the CIA, constantly criticizing Victoria Nuland’s efforts in Kiev and even accusing Bob Woodward of having been a CIA agent send to take down Nixon [1].
Of course, I agree that we should definitely not stay on the plantation, and it is even the case that I am sometimes skeptical of political channels that manage to have large followings on YouTube, wondering how authentically they are criticizing the government and the status quo.
Nonetheless, I think you are going too far, and that endorsing this mentality would lead to too much purity spiraling that basically would result in everyone feeling like they can’t trust anyone who isn’t completely making themselves irrelevant by going further & further into obscurity.
There is also something to be said about working on the Overton window. Of course, you have guys like Andrew Anglin who completely blow it up and throw all of our norms and expectations in the garbage as part of stretching the space of acceptable narrative in a high-profile way. But it is also the case that guys like Tucker Carlson, with far more reach than any of us, are vital in also pushing the Overton window further open.
[1] https://www.thewrap.com/tucker-carlson-bob-woodward-cia-asset-president-nixon/
They are both trannies, and they both look like trannies.
Observator.
You are a fool and a tool.
This kind of nonsense discredits actual true conspiracies, such as Obama being a clone made from the DNA of the Egyptian pharoah Akhenaten.
Yes, 100%. People are gullible fools and can be so easily played. I’ve supplied the video (in #207) numerous times and some will still claim male anatomy is there – taped down, FFS! Btw, it is the same video that has been there since I first saw it about 7 years ago. Same with all the green dress photos in the other link. They are the actual from many years ago.
I can’t help but wonder if all this phony crap gets dredged-up by the spook agencies to keep people distracted from the below amongst other more important things. It’s irritating that people have such lousy priorities and take the bait so easily.
1000% correct. It’s all such a jumble because the outcomes have been so varied that, yes, it’s difficult to prove the vax or virus caused many bad health outcomes. But, you and I know they did. I don’t personally know anyone that was hospitalized with Covid but, a neighbors 35 yr old niece was and she died there. I guarantee you it was from the protocols they used, not the virus.
Tangentially, I’m aware of a 36 yr woman who got two brain aneurysms three days after taking her first and only Covid vax. The Docs claimed to have fixed them but, she was on the state organ donor list so, somehow she was then declared “brain dead” and the slimy organ thieves got ahold of her parents, made their pitch and…boom!…she died by organ harvesting at the hospital down the street. Horrendous – people really don’t know about that “brain dead” scam. I also have a friend who died of ALS very possibly triggered by the vax and a few others who acquired auto-immune issues after taking it.
Anyhow, yes, we have to make accommodations for these weakened health conditions, don’t we? I moved to FL from the Midwest last year for a few reasons. One of them was because I felt I had to interact more with people outdoors. My now tendency to catch respiratory illnesses and suffer from the damn vax shedding of others will possibly be lessened by not being indoors with people as much. You live mostly alone with this stuff because few people are aware of what you and I are dealing with and no one talks about it. It’s crazy! We should be sharing info constantly about it. But, most are trained seals now and stay silent.
It’s difficult to describe to someone but, yes, I have felt almost all along that there is a residual in me left from the Covid virus. (Had it first week of Feb 2020) It’s the way health issues are triggered that makes it feel that way and the repetitiveness of them.
We do the best we can to manage…..with almost no resources, don’t we? If I described all this to a Doc, they’d likely just look at me with a blank stare (then go write it up to report to the CDC or NIH so they could recruit me as an eventual lab rat. Sigh…
The theory that Elizabeth was replaced has been advocated for by a number of people over the course of history. A good account is provided by Bram Stoker in his book Famous Impostors. His account is long winded, with the salience buried amid a lot of dilatory background, but I worked my way through it. His argument was that a suitable girl could not be quickly located, so a prepubescent boy who was a playmate of 10-year-old Elizabeth was substituted.
I am not an advocate of this theory, but i do argue in favor of its possibility. Conceivably, a female decoy (substitute) could later have been located. If the historical Elizabeth I was a decoy, then i lean toward the idea she was the Bisley boy. i just don’t think it happened.
The idea that Elizabeth experienced a change in her level of mental ability consequent to a near-death-experience is if anything more plausible. It does not require a decoy to be found, trained and possibly subjected to gender reassignment surgery. It does not require the involvement of a secret cabal of powerful courtiers.
Again, all I am arguing is that these things are possible and plausible. I am not saying they happened. When there are reasons of dynasty and reasons of state involved, highly placed people will do a lot of things, however.
I think it makes more sense to bring in a Turkish surgeon who you could be sure knew how to do the deed rather than scour Europe in the hopes of finding someone capable. The surgeon and his team also would be witnesses to the deed. Better to bring in someone from far away who did care much the who and the why.
Not that i think it happened. I don’t dispute the possibility though.
Whats with the ski boots in that top photo? LOL!
And who looks younger?
One born in 1939 and the other in 1945. Surgeons do miracles. Nothing is true in their faces.
Maybe, but we don’t need your kind. We are enjoying our lunchroom riot.
I personally believe that any sane person that watches Candace’s series on the subject would conclude its extremely likely Brigitte is a man
Laurent is so far away from a ” steelmanning ” here
Many people looking to do a profile on Brigitte were treated terribly
There are almost no available photos
Macrons parents were helping travs people transition
Macron seemingly knows nothing about his childhood
Macron is owned by the Rothschild’s
Macron is almost useless as a human
Macrons beloved grandma was into pedophilia literature
Seemingly Macron and Brigitte were MKUltra’d into becoming Manchurian candidate leaders
Macron was giving awards to surgeons performing feminization surgery
bare minimum Brigitte was 39 and Macron was 14 when they first got involved
Why does Brigitte threaten to sue Candace but refuse to answer her questions ?
Candace is getting advertising dollars from Larry Ellison’s Oracle on her podcasts and is currently trying to rehabilitate Harvey Weinstein
I would argue Ron and Laurent are certainly carrying water for somebody,since neither is stupid
Kind of makes me think that this tells us something about who they actually work for
Seemingly they are working for the Globalist side of the deep state and mostly try and put ” holes in the boat ” so to speak of the Mossad half of the deep state
Talmud is part of Babylonian conspiracy, but this particular idea comes from the Bible, Genesis 1:27, unfortunately, and is connected to the theory of two creations of man, the first one (before Adam), being apparently “man and female” in one (so hermaphrodite [the future pope in recent movie “Conclave”], gay, or transsexual), and God-like (see Kabala theory of godlike sparks of light imprisoned by Demiurge) unlike the later version of human, Adam.
It is an old theory, transcending religions, endorsed for example by Jacob Boehme an and his Time of the Lilly (renewal of the world – return to the ancient past really), who had nothing to do with Judaism but more with the myth of antediluvian civilisations. In the language of Bible, Genesis 3:15, it is expressed also as the fight between the seed of serpent (Satan and his fallen angels) and the seed of woman.
It is also visible in iconography, like the old coat of arms of Milan, where dragon [seed of serpent] strikes the heel of man [seed of woman] as per Genesis 3:15.
If you look with discernment, you will traces of this idea in many places.
Does Laurent know that Ron Unz covered this topic a year or 2 ago?
Note also how dragons in Western culture, until recently routinely spiked by St George on coats of arms, are becoming increasingly both more popular and less evil, e.g. movies “How to train your dragon” etc. Actually it already started with “The Never-ending Story” movie in 1984.
”
Yes that is EXACTLY what a sane person would believe, and to take it one step further, any sane person who has actually looked into the way the world runs, would be astonished if Macron’s wife WAS NOT a male.
That’s just what your controllers do.
Video Link
You are sad one.
Just one minute into that clip and it’s obvious what a complete moron that video maker is. He’s just another huckster trying to make a whores dollar. There are tens of thousands of them online today.
I can’t believe you buy that nonsense that so easily. Dial-in already.
https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.3ZaHyBtbo7boFvpREZ9GcgHaF7?w=224&h=180&c=7&r=0&o=5&dpr=1.3&pid=1.7
Well Old Sport. At least you’ve progressed to stage #2. Up next, “of course they’re all trannies, I’ve been saying that for years” (wink).
Because you’re a tranny so, you would know. Gotcha!
Naahh, you need to abide your own posted quote, old sport. And, require some actual sourcing and evidence before believing such dreck. Lara Bush, a tranny. Right-o!
Methinks you’ve bought a lot swamp land in “paradise” in your day. Cheers…
Catherine Deneuve is 82 and looks at least as good as Jean-Michel (“Brigitte”).
So the Xavier/Natacha hypothesis stands strong.
To Løvstuhagen
LOL
Only because you know little about the case and that discard all the facts which are not circumstancial.
There is no opacity in the French law. Any normal people would sue Natacha Rey, Xavier Poussard and Candace Owens for calomny. Why they did not it is first a fact and second the reason is quite obvious.
Are you saying that that Dude makes your tallywhacker stand at attention?
Laurent,
First, thank you for the many papers you’re sharing on TUR, and your books on Kennedy, “La Malédiction Papale”, and others.
Here, on Brigitte M, I’m not impressed at all by your review.
Indeed,
1. You’re not presenting Poussard investigations and book on a very fair way; in a nutshell, Poussard is saying the following
– He identified the point that the narrative on E & B Macron for first Macron’s election was very bizarre on many points, even if put together and executed by high-level professionals ; consequently, he started investigating who each of them was, finding further strange facts, including the one that decades of Brigitte’s and Emmanuel’s lives where empty from any pictures, videos, etc. His investigations was meeting many unexpected obstacles (from administration and witnesses)
– He met with Ms Ray who had a theory (Brigitte is a man, JM Trogneux); from there she started searching who was the mother of Brigitte’s 3 children, and eventually started jumping to unwarranted conclusions which were proved wrong in one case.
– he dropped Ray’s story version (demonstrated wrong in key aspects as you recall it) and stopped cooperation with her (too quickly reactive to new facts, unpredictable) ; he preferred working on a systematic basis reviewing painfully all accessible life steps of a) Brigitte, b) her brother, Jean-Michel, and c) Emmanuel – including working with other journalists who were working openly on Macrons story – but he was keen to avoid any risk of being accused of defamation, and actually was successful, up to now, on this critical front.
– He is keen to work on official documents, photos and tries to corroborate each of them
– he puts emphasis on comparisons of pictures to make his judgment objective, not intuitive; he’s using a technology used by China, also recommanded by Davos forum, so supposed to be state-of-the-art : not a bad choice. Would you have a better one to suggest ? It’s too easy to just say “technology is not enough”; indeed it’s used everyday for security control at the airport, etc.
– he drew his conclusion on “Brigitte is Jean-Michel”, “the ‘petit gros’ is not Jean-Michel”, etc. from the technology; he’s able to demonstrate his full good faith.
– he’s not trying to build an overall scenario of the entire story, as he would expose himself to mistakes and defamation suits – which is very wise. There are too many unknown facts during several decades !
– he is open to say “i’m wrong” if new evidence appears; as was said on the thread, it would be so simple for the Macrons to bring new pictures filling the numerous life holes, or more simply the proof that Brigitte is a woman, not a man; the mere fact that they do not bring this proof is speaking volumes!
– on key details :
a) when you say that the lampshade on the family picture is not important, you’re forgetting that it demonstrates that the picture was modified, and makes the link with the dentition point
b) on the fact that Brigitte and Jean-Michel were respective best man/woman to respective weddings, Poussard just says that it just renforces the need to have a final understanding of who are Brigitte and Jean-Michel; regarding the certificate of wedding, it’s clear that it was not found by a journalist, it was delivered to him on purpose, probably upon instruction from Presidency; as long as Presidency does not answer all open questions, there is in my mind no reason to draw much conclusion from a single document provided by it.
2.you’re not covering several key factors.
– since 2016 there are plenty of changes to many aspects of the official narrative, which make not only those aspects, but also the overall official story doutful.
– the French presidency is clearly trying to put hurdles on all investigators; files have disappeared, are empty; when they exist, Poussard needs FOIA-like processes to get access ; as an exemple, pictures of school classes are administrative documents, which each citizen is entitled to have access to : it took months to Poussard to get access to a raisonable number of photos. Witnesses are also clearly advised not to speak.
– French government attacked his employer through tax audits on all his belongings, so much so that this employer dismissed Poussard by end 2024 when he got the tax audit conclusion : “you’re too costly for my business”; at the same period Poussard’s bank accounts were blocked and closed without much explanation; clearly there is something to hide; there is a pending process where French police required Italy’s police cooperation (Poussard is an Italien resident) : Poussard made a list of all key owners and editors of French main stream media, and French police is investigating whether this would be a call for hate!
– During all trials against Rey and her colleague, the various stake holders (including the assumed Jean-Michel Trogneux) never brought recent IDs with a photo
– Brigitte eventually refused to confirm in a trial that she’s the woman on the wedding picture with André Auziere – Brigitte Trogneux
– The Algeria story : Brigitte claimed that she spent some time in early 60s studying in Algeria, which is blatantly impossible – whereas Jean-Michel was indeed there (nobody knows why, but this is establishel through army files).
– The Presidency’s legal strategy is noteworthy: they do not attack on the core point (Brigitte is a man, her brother), only on smaller points where other stake holders (not them) made a point (but may loose in appeal if Mrs Ray adopts a better trial strategy); the lawyer’s letter received by Candace was crazy, counterproductive for them, atc.
– At the end of the day, we have two potential criminal offenses :
a) pedophily by somebody in position of authority (a teacher), as Macron was 14Y old, and she 38 – or 46 (Jean-Michel assumption); interesting that the official story started with 17Y for him and early 30s for her. As was said, it can be prosecuted up to end-2025
b) use of somebody else identity – can be activated without limit; it would lead to cancellation of their wedding.
– The “Raison d’Etat” would demand that the Macrons bring evidence that the rumor is totally wrong, if they have some; in such case, it’s a huge shame not to make it appear, even a form of treason !
At the end of the book, for me, there is overwhelming evidence that
– Presidency has a lot to hide on the Macron pair, that Brigitte, not the ‘petit gros’, is Jean-Michel
– the entire story remains very obscure, with numerous potential scenarios around Emmanuel vs Jean-Jacques, and Emmanuel vs Brigitte.
I also remain puzzled by the fact that Brigitte was eventually a teacher during 8 years in “Franklin”, the jesuite high school in Paris.
I note that King Charles is shaking hands with Brigitte, whilst Prince Charles was kissing Mrs Sarkozy’s hand.
Mmm, not so obvious.
Considering that BM would have been a 40+ year old woman getting together with a 15 yo EM, who was her pupil to make it worse, their past situation is disgusting enough, not to mention outright illegal, for the Macrons to wisely avoid suing and attracting more attention on the beginning of their love affair.
An imposter such as Emmanuel Macron becoming twice President of France is the real anomaly.
The “Brigitte-as-a-trans-woman” fantasy is just that, a fantasy, born out of the stratospheric distance that now separates the French people from its rulers, the expression of the gaping cultural abyss ever-extending between real people and the artificial creature ruling from the Elysee Palace.
“Brigitte-the-trans-woman” is a powerful metaphor of this political schism; it is not a biological reality.
“With a world war looming” Frogs are en marche.
I would also add that French censorship of Poussard’s book is also speaking volumes.
Indeed his printer in France for the French version was intimidated and eventually decided not to print the book. Consequently, printing was done through Amazon, as for the english edition. It looks like the book is only available in France through Amazon
When Macron lastly visited France, Amazon interrupted the book sale for one day or two, due to a legal issue; sale resumed as soon ad Macron left the US soil.
At the end of the day, when a state is trying to censor a book, the censor’s good faith is questioned.
Brigette is not chubby and short. Taller than the average woman and slender. Chubby kids end up fat as they get older. Lack of family pictures. Not everyone carefully keeps them. They do and can get lost. Even if they are carefully saved. A couple boxes in a moving truck disappear and the pictures are gone.
I’m a historian and I’ve spotted so many blatant untruths in so much of Guyenot’s writing. And I know very well that much conventional history is biased or just wrong. I know both the conventional and the truthful alternative versions.
Mary Queen of Scots and her mother were both 6 feet tall. They must have been men. Woody Allan Jack Nicholson Tom Cruise Charlie Sheen and John Cryer are all short They must be women
Alden,
Not sure you’re addressing any of my points !
Quite obvious, Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy were sued for harassment and not for defamation or slander. Why?
Because in the latter cases they could ask evidence about the sex of Brigitte-Jean-Michel.
We know nothing about the beginning of their sexual relationship. Unless you were holding the candle. You know only when they met. You do not have a case.
Are you aware that Christian Cotten is sueing Brigitte for a theft of identity?
It appears that you know about nothing of the evidence.
The advantage for the handlers is that they can get rid of him anytime disclosing who is Brigitte.
By the way: where is Jean-Michel?
You know what is an electoral card, don’t you? You that there is no date of expiry and no id photo, don’t you?
All of this could go away, so very easily. The First Lady of France could simply release family photos through friendly media outlets. Showing herself pregnant…in the hospital after labor…during her courtship…during her marriage. Raising her children. Family vacations. Every photo that she herself will use when writing her own Autobiography. They question is…WHY? Why has she refused to release any supporting evidence? Why has she offered to PAY Candace Owens large sums of money not to run her story?
1. It used to be that Lying to the American public would end your Political career and get your fired. (Nixon and Watergate).
2. It used to be that being a previous Klu-Klux Klan Member could end your Political career (David Duke)…not Robert Byrd for some reason.
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQCRXbxrS-8Jb_qO5Qq61xTrczB_iW3y6tRQ4yZSCSw8Jxe7MuH_FOZYZIiBFTeNSApWJc&usqp=CAU
3. It used to be that a Public figure guilty of infidelity would slink away out of shame:
4. Certainly A president guilty of rape….would slink away out of shame:
5. It used to be that Creepy old Pedo politicians groping children would get fired.
6. It used to be any US Politician caught red handed Banging a Chinese Spy would immediately get fired and at the very least lose his/her security clearance:
7. It used to be that Pedo Politicians raping and murdering toddlers would get fired:
8. And when the same Pedo Politicians displayed truly disgusting Pedo artwork in their homes….and attend Satanic Spirit Cooking ceremonies they would certainly get fired:
What is my Point? Every compromised Politician is a useful tool, that is why they never get fired. As America and the world becomes more and more debauched….apathy sets in…the vomit reflex goes away….more and more PERVERSION is required to blackmail politicians. Now a Pedophile that becomes a TRANSGENDER is the NEW Blackmail Currency:
Natacha Rey took a lot of liberty with the truth, and saying so is an understatement.
Author Paul-Eric Blanrue, who wrote the outstanding “Encyclopedie des propos contre les Juifs”, explains how Natacha Rey had met Jean-Michel Trogneux , but kept this information secret in order to perpetuate her “Trans-Brigitte” narrative.
https://blanrue.blogspot.com/2024/03/laffaire-jean-michel-trogneux-les.html
Here he is, young and old:
https://blanrue.blogspot.com/2025/02/pour-en-finir-avec-les-brigittologues.html
He has been photographed and filmed multiple times, and recently as well. This photo of him attending his brother-in-law’s funeral in Amiens was published in a regional newspaper. He does resemble his sister Brigitte.
Finally, here is a video of the Macron’s 2007 wedding celebrations at Le Touquet. BM looked more feminine because she was middle-aged, prettier, more natural, less “modified” by plastic surgery.
https://www(dot)dailymotion(dot)com/video/x53c467
Where you see a transsexual man, I see an older woman who tried to make herself look good with plastic surgery and failed. But no surprise there, all older people with plastic surgery look weird. Doesn’t mean they are transsexuals.
and the two French ladies were successsfully sued by other stake holders than Brigitte and Emmanuel Macron !
Il faut sauver le soldat Laurent!
Now it is obvious who you are. Quoting Blanrue says it all! He is member of the team Alain Soral and Kontre Kulture, like Laurent.
Isn’t it funny to see that Xavier Poussard was member of that team through Faits & Documents until he was ejected from his position by Soral owner of F&D?
We are assisting to a “règlement de comptes” inside the fachosphere. And you clearly took side.
The man on your photos has his anniversary on the 15 June, he has 6 grandchildren ranging from age 14 to 1 or 2. He is not Jean-Michel born on the 11 February.
Posting photos of the petit-gros has no meaning at all unless you will show a recent identity document.
Btw it is not an “encyclopédie” but an “anthologie”.
The most funny thing is that the team Soral is coming to rhe rescue of the
MandchurianRothschild candidate.And now I understand better why you come here often on unz to poison the well. Your mask fell.
Where is Jean-Michel?
I noticed that Laurent gave up on this thread.
Fatal Flaws in Laurent Guyénot’s Historical and Philosophical Analysis
https://culturewars.com/news/fatal-flaws-in-laurent-guynots-historical-and-philosophical-analysis
And many if not all the Palestinian Jews converted to Islam.
Thanks so very much.
>It’s about the truth. I’ve heard, more than once, that even if the rumor is false, its destabilizes those in power, and that’s a good thing. Are lies and defamation legitimate political weapons?
No.
It is extremely relevant. They are trying to normalize sex with children and trannies.
It’s as stupid as the Flat Earth nonsense. Why are so many people consumed with such idiocy?
Candace Owens has ruined her credibility and amazingly did so after doing the right thing in condemning Israel’s on-going genocide.
I hear you but would not go that far. Nobody is perfect. Ron and Laurent have their blind spots.
Olivier, why would Laurent come to rescue of Macron? Please explain. Thank you
You are asking the wrong person. You should ask Laurent. But I guess that he will not reply, like Iris. Typical for cornered people.
Btw:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel
Did you see a photo with his profile? (I don’t speak about Laurent…)
It would be so simple to show an id card of Jean-Michel. The case would be closed immediately. Why does it not happen? If he has the shoulders of a man and the pelvic of a man, then is it a woman?
In whose name? Do you know?
The answer is straightforward, but it looks you have no idea about it.
The people who want to control him, to blackmail him.
Interesting. Young Macron looked like Mark Eydelshteyn, a Jewish actor from Russia, who had the main role in the film that won the best picture Oscar this year.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Eydelshteyn
It seems that he looks like many other people… Jean-Jacques…
By the way his complete name is: Emmanuel Jean-Michel Frédéric Macron.
Nobody so far said it. How strange.
Here it gets really funny. See Nelly Munthe born Rothschild. Try to find a photo of her when young…
With a new name: Turi Munthe.
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ftsa&q=Turi+Munthe&ia=images&iax=images
And another new name: Axel Munthe.
They keep the same first names generation after generation.
https://www.abebooks.fr/edition-originale/Anna-Echo-Catcher-Munthe-Adam-John-Chatto/31504874647/bd
It is true that the Ashkenazim have on average more than 50% European genes. However, the idea that the Palestinians are Arab is a myth. Actually, the Palestinians speak Arabic and are mostly Muslim because they were conquered early on in the Arab military expansion. Genetically, the Palestinians are predominately Bronze Age Levantines with admixture from Arabs and other ethnicities to the north.
So the cruel irony is that the Israeli Ashkenazim, the founders of the Zionist State, are mostly European, while the Palestinians who are being destroyed are the largest modern population which is genetically very close to the ancient populations whose histories the Old Testament describes. In other words, the Palestinians are descendants from Jews who stayed in the Levant and converted to Islam. This fact should be shouted from the rooftops, yet is almost entirely ignored even by the Palestinians and their sympathizers.
“everyone must do their own research in order not to follow someone else’s thinking” John 8:31. How is that doing your own thinking when you quote the Bible? Isn’t that letting King James do your thinking for you, or whoever wrote your version of the Bible. Asking for a friend.
Video Link
How suspicious is this that the surgeon, Dr. Francois Faivre, who says he worked with Dr. Patrick Bui, who worked on BM for the sex change or whatever happened to him/her was found dead the other day supposedly from suicide by falling 14 floors to his death. His sister says he wasn’t suicidal and said his death was probably do to the story he was about to divulge to a French magazine. Not saying his death proves the BM story but. dang, that sure is a tough pill to swallow of one’s brother dying like that out of the blue.