Working relationship
Assuming BO win, I'm not sure how I would feel having to work on a human-rated project with a supplier who was forced on me by the courts.
888 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Apr 2021
Though, in this case, Netflix is not running because they have decided to drop support for iOS 9.
Would it be fair to expect Apple to support migration of the hardware to an OS it was not designed to run, or should Netflix be required to maintain support for older versions until the number of active users drops below some threshold?
Whilst a lot of automotive is based on AUTOSAR, other protocols are also used - such as J1939 (mainly large trucks) and MilCAN (military vetronics; compatible with J1939).
These operate mainly in a synchronous mode (but do also support asynchronous), with a high-priority sync frame being used to trigger the synchronous nodes to send their messages. Each sync frame also includes a counter so that messages can be assigned to specific slots, ensuring that the bus load is distributed and the system doesn't end up with bandwidth starvation that could arise if everything were sent at the same time.
This really helps when you're running hard real-time closed loop control systems over the bus, as sample times and output generation occur at much more well-defined points in time, reducing jitter (and therefore loop gain errors).
I used a similar system to this (before J1939 emerged) to implement vehicle dynamics controllers on prototype platforms.
Not always the case though.
I know of a local stone mason (one of the best in the area) who built a dry stone wall round a garden and had not been paid many months after the work was completed. He eventually rolled up in his truck and started to take it down and load the blocks. It was surprising how quickly he then got paid.
The guy who owned the house was a "self-builder" (and general scallywag) who had managed to get himself on "account hold" with all the builders' merchants within a 100 mile radius...
A friend of mine moved into a new build. After a few months, they got the first water bill - for £0.00.
They thought this was a bit strange. Even the children were reasonably willing to wash, so they were sure they had used at least some water. However, maybe it was just because it was the first bill.
No - the second was also for £0.00. They contacted the water company and told them they thought something was not right. The company sent out someone to read the meter, who confirmed that it still read zero, so where was nothing wrong with the reading.
The company didn't seem to care that there was obviously something wrong - either with the meter or the identification of which one was theirs.
After about a year, the guy gave up trying to tell the company he was not being billed for the water they were using. He's kept all the correspondence for when the company take him to court for theft of water.
Some of the products in spent fuel remain toxic for hundreds of thousands of years (some of the plutonium isotopes, for example) and will require proper geological disposal (using current methods). You also have to put them out-of-reach of terrorists and the like.
The best way of dealing with the "waste" fuel is to recycle it and use it as fuel. The UK used to recycle its fuel, but stopped doing that a while back now. Putting recycled fuel into fast-breeder type reactors (the UK was one of the first into this technology, but gave in in the 70's - I think) is also another possibility as that "burns" a lot of what would otherwise end up as waste. If that's done, then about 96% of the waste is reused, with the remaining 4% only needing to be stored for about 1000 years before it is no more harmful than the uranium ore from which it was produced.
Why was it EOL'ed? Was it because:
1) It is no longer capable of doing the job;
2) The manufacturer didn't want to keep supporting it.
Either way, they should be required to fix security vulnerabilities (a.k.a "defects") in products that are EOL where it can reasonably be expected that a significant number are still in service. We need to stop the creation of scrap when it can reasonably be prevented.
Really? All the "data" that the app has access to is mine on my local machine. Why should installing it give any agency the "right" to access that data, especially if I am in a different legal jurisdiction?
Similarly for the "13 year" limit - there is no need for any data about a user to be transmitted from the app.
Also, what is the GDPR "reason" for collecting, storing and processing this data? I doubt that "we might find it useful" is adequate.
I recently upgraded to a 900/100 connection with a 450/50 minimum service level.
Upload has been solid, but downloads are sometimes as low as 230 and vary wildly. I let my ISP know and they raised a fault with Openreach.
Openreach engineer came out; I was very impressed with how he came across. He ran a few speed tests and agreed there was an issue. He called "the office', who got him to re-do all the "has the customer done..." checks and a speed test - which showed a speed of 680. "Ah", said the office person, "see, there is no fault"! He wasn't taking that as he seen speeds of about 260 a few minutes earlier, so he requested an escalation - it ended up with "level 3", which he didn't even know existed! He finally went away (no resolution) and said he would keep pushing the case - and mentioned that he has been told that "the line carrying my data was over capacity and I would be moved to another".
Got an email from the ISP a few days later. This basically says they have been told by Openreach "there is a known problem in the area" and that "there is no estimated time to resolution". This is going to be fun :-(
A new player is preparing to install their own fibre network in the area. If I'm lucky, the Openreach case will drag on long enough for me to be able to cancel and switch!
Yes, I think it was removed as a requirement for IP phone services last year.
I had an Openreach engineer here on Monday. They are still installing ONTs for FTTP with battery backup (for phone and internet) in new build estates, but that's just to use up stock. Single installs and replacements are all now without the backups.
I'm using a fit-Uptime to power the ONT and Fritz!Box (which includes DECT and analog phone support), which will cover most of the outages we get.
I've also got another small UPS (from Amazon) that I use for a pfSense box and WiFi AP (PoE) - mainly because I work from home and it's a pain when a cut of a few seconds interrupts a conversation ;-)
So, my Netflix, Amazon subscription doesn't generate any revenue for them? Or do they mean they should have asked for more? Or do they just think that they should be paid more than once?
Why should they get 2% on the $10,000 I used to build a crypto mining rig? (I didn't, but I might have).
Get real.
Rural location, order placed about 6 weeks before VDSL contract expired as my new ISP said it could take up to that long to get an FTTP connection appointment (all underground).
Openreach contractor turned up the next day to install the exterior box and run the fibre, with another contractor arriving a few days later to complete the install.
I am now working with a very helpful Openreach engineer to resolve a speed issue, but he's fairly confident this is down to a provisioning / capacity limit that he can work round - supposed to be 900/100, but sometime only get 230/90 with a minimum of 450/50. That's still 5 times faster download and 8 times faster upload than I had before!