From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content
Conduct
Deletion
Enforcement
Editing
Project content
WMF (?)
Inline cleanup tags
Attribution Clarity Miscellaneous Neutrality Precision
Time-sensitivity Verifiability
Dubious Bare URLs Incomplete or broken citation Missing or problematic reference
Wording General advice
Policies Guidelines Information pages Essays Individual criteria
General
Articles
Redirects
Files
Categories
Templates
User pages
Other
Content
Conduct
Deletion
Enforcement
Editing
Project content
WMF (?)
General Articles and content Page handling User conduct Other
Templates for archiving
Recommended Side box Headers
With navigation Without navigation With search
{{ Talk header }} (contains an automatically appearing archive search box and nav)
Content formatting Lists Discussion Automatic archiving systems
Adminitis
Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball
Akin's Laws of Article Writing
Alternatives to edit warring
ANI flu
Anti-Wikipedian
Anti-Wikipedianism
Articlecountitis
Asshole John rule
Assume bad faith
Assume faith
Assume good wraith
Assume stupidity
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
Avoid using preview button
Avoid using wikilinks
Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
Barnstaritis
Before they were notable
BOLD, revert, revert, revert
Boston Tea Party
Butterfly effect
CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh?
Complete bollocks
Counting forks
Counting juntas
Crap
Don't stuff beans up your nose
Don't-give-a-fuckism
Don't abbreviate "Wikipedia" as "Wiki"!
Don't delete the main page
Editcountitis
Edits Per Day
Editsummarisis
Editing under the influence
Embrace Stop Signs
Emerson
Fart
Five Fs of Wikipedia
Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake
Go ahead, vandalize
How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
How to get away with UPE
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
How to vandalize correctly
How to win a citation war
Ignore all essays
Ignore every single rule
Is that even an essay?
Mess with the templates
My local pond
Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them
Legal vandalism
List of jokes about Wikipedia
LTTAUTMAOK
No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
No episcopal threats
No one cares about your garage band
No one really cares
No, really
No sorcery threats
Notability is not eternal
Oops Defense
Play the game
Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
Please bite the newbies
Please do not murder the newcomers
Pledge of Tranquility
R-e-s-p-e-c-t
Requests for medication
Requirements for adminship
Rouge admin
Rouge editor
Sarcasm is really helpful
Sausages for tasting
The Night Before Wikimas
The first rule of Wikipedia
The Five Pillars of Untruth
Things that should not be surprising
The WikiBible
Watchlistitis
Wikipedia is an MMORPG
What Wikipedia is not/Outtakes
Why not create an account?
Yes legal threats
You don't have to be mad to work here, but
You should not write meaningless lists
About essays Policies and guidelines
Style Content Rationale Existing lists Templates Assistance
Partners not currently on the platform:
Inline cleanup tags
Attribution Clarity Miscellaneous Neutrality Precision
Time-sensitivity Verifiability
Dubious Bare URLs Incomplete or broken citation Missing or problematic reference
Wording General advice
Sourcing BLP -specificTopic specific Dispute-related Citation improvements General advice
The Ten Commandments of Rational Debate (borrowed without notice from Antidiskriminator) [ edit ]
1. Thou shall not attack a person's character but the argument itself. ("Ad hominem")
2. Thou shall not misrepresent or exaggerate a person's argument in order to make it easier to attack. ("Straw Man Fallacy)
3. Thou shall not use small numbers to represent the whole. ("Hasty Generalization")
4. Thou shall not argue thy position by assuming one of its premises is true. ("Begging the Question")
5. Thou shall not claim that because something occurred before something else, it must be the cause. ("Post Hoc/False Claim")
6. Thou shall not reduce the argument down to two possibilities. ("Fake Dichotomy")
7. Thou shall not argue that because of our ignorance that the claim must be true or false. ("Ad Ignorantiam")
8. Thou shall not lay the burden of proof onto him who is questioning the claim. ("Burden of Proof Reversal")
9. Thou shall not assume "this" follows "that" when "it" has no logical connection. ("Non Sequitur")
10. Thou shall not claim that because a premise is popular, therefore, it must be true. ("Bandwagon Fallacy")