We have a judgment (Part 1)

25 June 2024

In the case against the Mail on Sunday (Associated Newspapers) and Barney Calman, Health Editor of the Mail on Sunday.

I have written nothing on this blog for a while, because of my on-going legal case. Now we have a judgment, part one.

Step backwards for a moment. Zoë Harcombe and I are suing the Mail on Sunday and Barney Calman for libel. This goes way back to March 2019, yes over five years. The Mail on Sunday published article(s) that we felt were very damaging and defamatory.

In short, we were effectively accused of being liars, and ‘purveyors of misinformation’ about statins (drugs that lower LDL/cholesterol). Because of our lies hundreds of thousands of people had stopped taking statins, resulting in (potentially) many thousands of heart attacks, strokes and deaths. Which, as a doctor, is the worst ‘crime’ it is possible to be accused of.

There was much discussion, in the articles, of this being far worse that the MMR scandal involving Andrew Wakefield. You may remember that he was stuck off as a doctor for his papers and articles on the MMR vaccine. This could obviously have happened to me. If what I did was worse. This threat has hung over me for over five years.

In his judgment I think that the following statement was the most powerful

There is perhaps a palpable irony in the fact the Defendants, in Articles that so roundly denounced those alleged to be the purveyors of misinformation, so seriously misinformed their own readers

The Judge has basically ruled that the Mail on Sunday misinformed its own readers. And as he also said.

I have found that Mr Calman did not believe that the Claimants were dishonest, yet this is the core allegation that the Articles made against them, as Mr Calman must have known (or a reasonable journalist in his position would inevitably have realised).

We were not dishonest, yet Barney Calman wrote articles where the core allegation is that we were. I will write more on this issue over the next few weeks and months. The legal issues were ridiculously complicated and so I include my lawyers’ statement below, which explains a bit more as well as a link to the judgment itself. The full judgment – all 255 pages of it – can be seen here.

High Court dismisses Mail on Sunday’s public interest defence in “statin deniers” libel case

In a major Judgment delivered on 25 June 2024, Mr Justice Nicklin has dismissed a public interest defence advanced by The Mail on Sunday in a libel claim brought by Dr Zoë Harcombe and Dr Malcolm Kendrick.  The decision follows a preliminary trial last year in what the Judge described as “the most significant piece of defamation litigation” that he had seen in a very long time. 

The case relates to articles published in March 2019, which contained allegations that the Claimants had made knowingly false statements about the cholesterol-lowering drug, statins, causing a large number of people not to take prescribed statin medication with the harm to public health that flows from this (allegations which Dr Harcombe and Dr Kendrick assert are both highly defamatory and false). The Mail on Sunday refused to apologise or even remove or alter its articles. The Claimants therefore issued High Court proceedings in February 2020.   

Dismissing the newspaper’s public interest defence, the Judge observed (at paragraph [457]) of his judgment) that: 

“There is perhaps a palpable irony in the fact the Defendants, in Articles that so roundly denounced those alleged to be the purveyors of misinformation, so seriously misinformed their own readers.”

The case will now move on to its next phase, as the Court was not at this stage adjudicating on other aspects of the case such as the Truth defence which the Mail on Sunday is attempting to put forward, albeit the Court’s findings mean that the Defence as currently formulated, and subject to any appeal, “cannot be maintained” [562]. 

Dr Harcombe PhD, a writer and speaker on diet health and nutritional science, has said of the judgment: 

“I am delighted by the findings of the court today, in what is a hugely complex case. I am grateful to the Judge for his detailed and careful analysis of all of the facts and pleased that he has recognised the enormity and unfairness of the public attack on our integrity.”

 Dr Kendrick, a General Practitioner and author with a special interest in the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease, said: 

“I am very pleased that the Judge has found in our favour, and that he has dismissed the public interest defence. It was always our position that we had not been treated fairly by the publishers, and the Judgment sets out clearly how badly we were in fact treated.”

Dr Harcombe and Dr Kendrick are represented by Claire Gill and Dominic Garner of Carter-Ruck, and by Adrienne Page KC and Godwin Busuttil of 5RB.
Links

  • Read the full judgment here.
  • Read the summary of the judgment here.

 

172 thoughts on “We have a judgment (Part 1)

  1. janetgrovesart

    I was only thinking of you yesterday, wondering whether I would ever read another of your marvellous blogs and now here we all are. I am so pleased and relieved to read this. I can only say from my personal point of view that when I took advice from your book I began to feel better almost immediately and have never looked back. I am GRATEFUL.

    I hope all goes well in the next stage.

    cheers

    JanB

    Reply
  2. aapollo62426901

    Well done for persevering! And on a quick read a positive result. Rather stressful I imagine. Looking forward to future blogs. Allan Pollock

    Reply
  3. rnspainter

    great news Malcolm – and I hope the next phase exposes that the truth( defence being inapplicable shows that there re genuine concerns about statins effectiveness and negligible effect on overall mortality.

    Reply
  4. Robert MacGregor

    Congratulations Dr Kendrick in this court ruling. I hope you will soon share the other information you had hinted at in past interviews.

    Robert MacGregor

    >

    Reply
    1. Dr. Malcolm Kendrick Post author

      thank you. there is much to digest from the judgement and the case could, possibly, go on. Almost certainly not, but it is highly complex. We await response from the defendants. The law does not move fast.

      Reply
      1. Lynda Morgan

        I am thrilled for you – congratulations. What a wonderful result, and it’s of course as it should be. I continue to benefit from your excellent work, as do many of my friends. I hope we will hear more from you soon!

        Lynda

        Reply
  5. Jeremy May

    Congratulations Malcolm and Zoe. I, like many others follw you both anb have enormous respect for your knowledge and integrity. Kepp up the fight and thank you.

    Reply
    1. Dr. Malcolm Kendrick Post author

      Thank you. There is still much to be said, but there are still many legal processes to go through depending on the basta.%&*, sorry dependents, decide to do. Appeal and drag heels and suchlike.

      Reply
  6. Julien Crowther

    Congratulations Dr Kendrick! This is a very good decision and I hope the next phase will see you fully vindicated.

    Reply
  7. Geoff

    “I have written nothing on this blog for a while, because of my on-going legal case. “

    Yeah, we know, and many of us have been highly irritated atbeing deprived of your insights by the many goon squads extant, and what a blessing that you had the fortitude to endure and to return!

    Welcome back, fine Sir and may your wisdom continue to flow rampant and long!

    Reply
      1. fredericahuxley

        Congratulations- vindication of the highest order! We eagerly await learning of your new targets.

        Reply
      2. fredericahuxley

        Congratulations – well deserved vindication of the highest order! Eagerly awaiting learning of your targets, as so much misinformation is being bandied about in the compromised press.

        Reply
      3. Prudence Kitten

        It seems to me that there are, indeed, many lusciously juicy targets. For years the bullies who run theings and their media assistants have been bluffing hard – and their bluff has rarely been called. Now the “man behind the curtain” is in full sight.

        Just one note of caution, Dr Kendrick: you and Dr Harcombe must be cautious, and avoid overreaching. The consequences would still be calamitous.

        Reply
        1. Dr. Malcolm Kendrick Post author

          I am considering writing a book about the trial, and all the things around it. The power of the pharmaceutical industry, the loss of objectivity in, medical, science. The fact that ‘experts’ are often simply singing the song of whoever pays them the most. The attacks on those who dare question anything. We have a terribly broken system which I do not believe can be called science anymore.

          The age of enlightenment is slipping from our grasp, I fear. ‘Experts’ whatever an expert may be, control the agenda, and they in turn are, far too often, controlled by money, or the temptation of power, control and status that is dangled before them. To quote Richard Feynman. ‘Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.’

          Reply
          1. dryhill99

            Similar to Tim Noakes “Lore Of Nutrition”? Though in your more chatty style.

            I think a joint authorship by Zoe Harcombe & yourself would fly off the shelves.

            And with Covid – you’ve probably enough material for TWO books!

  8. Carolyn Driver

    So very pleased to hear this – it must have been very stressful for you and your families and like others commenting here I look forward to reading mire of your blogs very soon.

    Reply
  9. Allan Young

    Delighted for you both and for the truth. I thank the lord that you don’t appear to have had a political judge.

    Rest easy for a while and then back to work.

    Reply
  10. Yvonne Van Eck-Remmers

    We have been waiting patiently for the verdict to arrive, but it was well worth the wait. Many congratulations from The Netherlands!!!

    Reply
  11. Shaun Clark

    Wonderful news! If nothing else this should give your own, and Zoe’s health a mighty boost!! Take care!!!

    Reply
  12. John

    Good heavens has common sense prevailed at last. Great books by the way. One day Homeopathy will get a clean name as well, it’s been brilliant for my 80 years !

    Reply
  13. zrpradyer

    The Mail on Sunday is not unique in giving the impression it’s wholly captured/bought by big pharma and thus enthusiastically publishes screeds paying homage to their benefactors.

    It seems that, anyone who isn’t a keen and repetitive drug taker is not only a dangerous crank, but an anti-science, anti-life-saving traitor.

    Well done you! All this and Julian Assange freed, if destitute!

    Enjoy your summer!

    Reply
  14. [email protected]

    Dear Malcolm

    Many thanks indeed for this email – that is great news and I am delighted for you both.

    Coincidentally, I was thinking about you just the other day when I went for a routine cardio-vascular health check (as an oldie of 63) at my GP surgery. After testing a blood sample the nurse informed me that my cholesterol was a bit high, at 5.5, though with no reference to “good” or “bad” cholesterol. She advised me to improve aspects of my diet to reduce it, told me to come back again in 3 months for a retest, and said that if it’s not lower then statins might be the next course of action.

    I didn’t think there was much point getting into a debate with her as it would be fruitless, but when I do return in 3 months I might have my copy of The Great Cholesterol Con with me!

    Best wishes – and good luck with the ongoing case.

    Chris

    Chris Trickey

    Reply
    1. janetgrovesart

      Chris – I saw my diabetes specialist nurse a while ago. She looked at my Cholesterol results (I refuse statins) and said they were high, but then she looked at the breakdown and saw that trigs were very low and HDL was high. “Well done,” she said, “carry on doing what you’re doing.”

      I’m so lucky to have such an on the ball nurse.

      Reply
    2. Paul Travis

      As a retired GP, I am dismayed that GPs are still so ignorant of the proven facts concerning diet and heart disease. I have followed Malcolm’s insightful work for over a decade and have spoken with him about the general ignorance regarding statins and cholesterol in Primary Care. As well as taking a copy of Malcolm’s book(s) you might like to consider presenting your GP with the equally enlightening book by Dr Catherine Shanahan: Dark Calories.

      Best wishes, and good health.

      Reply
      1. Geoff

        Talk about dismayed! I have doc friends including an infectious disease

        man and all of them still believe in the safety and efficacy of “vaccines!!!”

        Reply
        1. Prudence Kitten

          Well, why shouldn’t they? It does one no good to have a powerful intellect and good education if one refuses to use them.

          Reply
  15. Michael

    Congratulations! I have books written by both of you and have followed your guidance on diet and statins for a few years now and am relieved I have nothing to worry about!

    Reply
  16. Beverley Scowen

    Malcolm, it is thanks in large part to people like you and Zoe that my passion for General Practice has reignited in the past few years. I spend many happy hours educating my patients on how to reclaim their health with lifestyle change and cut down long lists of drugs they have been prescribed with, I believe, criminally overstated benefits. I never doubted that you had a cast iron case but confess I was anxious that the establishment might conspire to silence you. I am delighted you are showing them up to be the bought and paid for mouthpieces for the Oligarchs they so undoubtedly are.

    Reply
  17. markgobell

    Good news. Perhaps when it is all over, some light might fall upon the journalist’s motivation …

    Reply
  18. markmarkwhite01

    Congratulations Malcolm, 5 years, Wow! How ironic that during that time many more medics have expressed the same concerns as you about Cholestrol and Statins. Hopefully this will benefit you in phase 2 to help counter the stress you must have felt. All the best.
    Mark White

    Get Outlook for Androidhttps://aka.ms/ghei36

    Reply
  19. Adrian Torson

    Dear Malcolm,

    I am so pleased for you and Dr Harcombe about the outcome.

    Fingers crossed for the next part!

    Kind regards,

    Adrian Torson (Macclesfield)

    Reply
  20. Richard Williams

    A victory for you both and for Truth. Well done for having the courage to fight on, knowing the consequences of the judgement going against you. And on the day Assange is released too!

    Reply
  21. Antony Sanderson

    Absolutely made my day . . . I say this as someone who took simvastatin for around 4 years : I developed T2D (push back by low carb diet) and suffered muscle and nerve damage in the arms. 15 years on I still have a weak right arm

    Reply
  22. Teresa Ayoub

    Very pleased to see the judgement and relieved on your behalves. I enjoy the books you have written and feel sure there is substance in your arguments. Regards Teresa

    Reply
  23. Steve Cook

    Very pleased Malcolm . Now to Part 2. Must be terribly expensive process and the press has deep pockets.

    Reply
  24. John tickner

    I think that calls for a large glass of red this evening (plus Zoe’s) since she doesn’t drink !

    Reply
  25. Jan Wellmann

    Hey Malcolm, that’s incredible news, good traction! Would love to do a catchup interview with you at some phase that’s convenient for you.

    Let me know your thoughts.

    Kindly, Jan

    Reply
  26. Tina Deubert

    Good for you and Zoe! Perhaps the manufacturers of statins should now be put under the spotlight for their misinformation. I was at the ihcan summit on Saturday and very much enjoyed your talk. Thank you for all you do. Best wishes Tina

    Reply
  27. Martin Back

    What a relief for you and Zoë. Sometimes the good guys win!

    And also a relief for we your readers who have missed your insightful comments on medical matters.

    Reply
  28. Dr Jonathan Bacon-Sandwich

    I am not one for coarse triumphalism but in a word

    YEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    PS this is the tip of a proverbial iceberg and statins are not the only sucker drug paricularly for post ACS regimes.

    Reply
  29. Richard Twiddy

    Well done! I hope it continues to go well. I came off statins and other medications and am fitter and happier. At 74 I’m walking and weightlifting to keep fit and have lost weight. Thank you so much for opening my eyes. Best wishes to you both!

    Richard Twiddy

    Reply
  30. Heather Farquharson

    Congratulations to you and your team. I think in this context the words ‘hasta la victoria siempre’ are very appropriate.

    Reply
  31. rosemary wellman

    Thank you, Dr Kendrick for posting this. Believe it or not, I have read it all, neither the Mail on Sunday nor Matt Hancock come out of it well, to say the least. Very best wishes Rosemary Wellman

    Reply
  32. bilton21

    Well done both of you.

    We haven’t heard from you for a while Doc, hope this means you are back in the driving seat!

    You’ve been missed!

    Reply
  33. Carolyn Carter

    Many, many congratulations to you both. Hopefully, you can now get on with your lives and do what you do so splendidly – telling it how it is! I greatly look forward to reading more of your very readable, interesting and educational writings.

    Reply
  34. Donna

    Hello – I’ve been wondering why I hadn’t seen anything from you for soooo long! Have missed your insights & humor. So far, I’ve been able to keep hubby from being on these deadly drugs & their terrible side-effects! May God continue to impress truth upon those who have the power to make or break this case! You must be weary of having to defend against these journalists who declare themselves experts without training or experience! Keep calm & carry on!!

    Reply
  35. rutlerfan01

    Warmest congratulations to you both, Dr Kendrick and Dr Harcombe, and to your legal team upon this thoroughly well-deserved judgement. You’ve both shown immense courage in going forward with this legal challenge. Dr Kendrick, your writings have done so much to help a beloved family member: thank you for your wonderful work.

    Reply
  36. Barbara Segal

    Congratulations to you both.

    All this must be eye-wateringly expensive – have you got funding from somewhere? if not, something must be set up for you. And I guess much depends on whether you can get all your expenses paid by the paper etc

    Reply
  37. Gary Ogden

    Hooray! So good to hear from you, Dr. Kendrick. In a world consumed by madness, there is still sanity present in the judicial system.

    Reply
  38. Pauline Moore

    Some good news to skim through on a different subject – another side of the same corrupt medical paradigm. Have been reading Malcolm Kendrick’s occasional newsletters for years, and his exceptional book ’The Clot Thickens’ that proposes an entirely different theory for the development of heart disease. In a nutshell – cholesterol is the innocent, trying-to-be-helpful, bystander in heart disease; like blaming firemen because they are always present at a house-fire.

    xx

    >

    Reply
  39. Rachael Spriggs

    Thank you for taking a stand. It must have been very stressful. So glad you’ve been vindicated.

    Reply
  40. hugso2

    Hooray! A crumb of sanity at last. Please keep up the excellent work. I have recommended your super books to many of my friends.

    Reply
  41. healinginsideout

    Thank you for your extraordinary courage, humor, integrity and curiosity. And for writing THE CLOT THICKENS, which is laid out with such clarity, cutting through jargon and billions to make cardiovascular illness and health an enjoyable read. Kudos to you! BJ Fleming D.C. LAc.

    Reply
  42. Alison

    Congratulations on part one. Here’s to continued justice for you both and significant recompense from the other parties. 👍

    Reply
  43. Eggs 'n beer

    Justice Nicklin seems to be a paragon amongst judges. One who has genuinely taken the trouble to understand the issues involved and make sure that justice is served. and congratulations to you and Zoë for your strength and determination to start this and see it through.

    Reply
  44. ybfruitandveg

    What a treat to hear this great news!! Congratulations to you both, and many thanks to your legal team. Looking forward to reading Part 2, and future articles on this Blog. Also many thanks to you both for all that you are doing for us.

    Yvonne Beran 🙂

    Reply
  45. Anne Marie

    Thank God that it is going in the right direction. Cannot wait until you are back and giving us your wisdom.

    Reply
  46. MR

    Yep, indeed truly happy for you and this judgement.

    But.

    It’s all very well winning people over to your beliefs (as have I been won), but leaving them in a position of having no doctor to turn to is not much fun.

    Reply
  47. jduffydo

    I agree with you completely.

    My site is downtoearthmedicine.org I have an article on it about statins

    I am praying for you.

    Remember it is all about the money. They do not care about health, just writing more rx’s

    Dr. Ure

    Reply
  48. Heather Watson

    Congratulations, hope you both are fully vindicated and compensated.As with Dr Tim Noakes and Dr Fettke it taken time but you’ll get there.Its an uphill battle but you have to fight back.In Australia cardiologists are still largely prescribing statins to everyone so there’s a long way to go.Even diabetes associations are recognising the value of a low carb approach now. There’s still a long way to go before it becomes mainstream but it is happening

    Reply
  49. KnackFarmer

    I am so heartened by this verdict and I know there must be some weight lifting from both your shoulders. This outcome is part of what I’m calling ‘The Great Unravelling’ ©️ — the beginning of the end of poor science, perpetuated rhetoric fuelled by Big … Pharma/Food/Ag/Gov’t whose sole aim is profit over humanity. We are no longer sheep and we will not go quietly into that good night.

    I’m sure there is more to all this and your victory will remain bittersweet for a time – I’d encourage you, Zoë and Tim Noakes to get on a Zoom call and share a dram of Scotland’s finest.

    Reply
  50. J Wood

    I don’t know whether “congratulations “ is the right word to use in this circumstance however, it is extremely pleasing to see that the judge ruled in your favour and, although he said the Calman hadn’t acted maliciously, we all know that’s exactly what he did! Well done guys. Keep on keeping on! 😊

    Reply
  51. Stephen Cooke

    Congratulations, good news indeed – a massive relief, I’d imagine……..a massive relief for everyone

    Reply
  52. JH

    Delighted to read this. Well done for taking them on and persevering. It is not easy to fight such a case. I hope your victory will be widely publicised.

    Reply
  53. Robin Hull

    Wow! Wow! Wow! I;ll read it all this afternoon. Wonderful. Kindest regards, Robin. . . . . . . . . . .

    Robin Hull 15 Horsell Road London N5 1XL 020 7609 2764

    Reply
  54. cavenewt

    This is such welcome news! And now we can look forward to more Kendrick writing, which has been sorely missed.

    Reply
  55. Tim

    Great news and good luck with the next part of this crazy process. Why can’t there be debate about science anymore, without people being called deniers. Manmade C02 being the thermostat for the world’s climate is another nonsensical thesis that never gets a proper debate, and if we persist in the NetZero dictat will cause millions more deaths than high cholesterol!

    Keep up the good work.

    Reply
  56. dearieme

    Warmest congratulations.

    Dr Harcombe and Dr Kendrick are represented by Claire Gill and Dominic Garner of Carter-Ruck, and by Adrienne Page KC and Godwin Busuttil of 5RB.

    It’s pity, mind, that Sir Keith Strimmer, Shadow Minister for Open Spaces and Grassy Verges, wasn’t representing The Mail.

    Reply
  57. Ian P

    Excellent news, Malcolm. You and Zoe are absolute heroes. The tide is turning in this country in many ways. Common sense is breaking out, even in the ‘ corridors of power’! Big Pharma, MSM and wokeist politicians had better wake up. We are coming for the lot of you!

    Reply
  58. Mary Jo Boys

    I am so grateful to hear there is some sanity left in the world. Keep up the fight for free exchange of ideas.

    Reply
    1. Dr. Malcolm Kendrick Post author

      The good thing about the legal system is that they remain completely unconcerned about ‘status’ and ‘reputation’ of those involved. I think they have seen to many VIPs acting like petulant children, and lying though their back teeth to pay much attention to the ‘do you know who I am’ brigade.

      The system is not perfect, or course, but it is our only real defense against the rich and powerful getting their own way, on everything. See under Russia and China and other such dictatorships. If we lose the objectivity of the courts, and the primacy of the law, we lose everything….really.

      My main issues are that it is all far too costly, and slow. So many are put off by the threat of losing everything to go to court.

      Reply
      1. Steve R

        You say that , Malcolm, but look what the legal system has done to Lucy Letby.

        Not perfect, indeed….

        Reply
      2. Shaun Clark

        As with so many matters today, we can get a bit out-paced in world suffering from a landfill of utterly specious MSM copy-cat grifters forever spewing out their double-edged garbage-verbiage, and much of is unhelpfully brought about by a deluge of joined-up asymmetric bullshit that terrifyingly folk seem happy to go along with. Americana-type Big Pharma/Monster Ag snake-oil could indeed destroy us all. However, it might all be what ‘they’ want.

        Reply
  59. David Harrison

    Thank you. You both changed my life, and perhaps others I know, for the better. I’ve lost count of the number of people I’ve mentioned your work to. What you did for me, as a reasonably intelligent but accepting person, was to take control of my own health and start to question everything.

    I have noticed some changes in our local practice suggesting that GPs are beginning to listen and advise – rather than direct; your championing work and advances in medical education are hopefully changing practice for the better everywhere.

    Thanks again and many congratulaions.

    Reply
  60. Angela

    My husband, after suffering many mysterious muscle aches and pains and feeling tired all the time, has stopped taking statins; against doctors advice. He’s now a different man. Plus he’s stopped taking blood pressure medication as his blood pressure has now returned to normal. So very pleased for this result, so far. Thank you for all the work that you have done and all the informative articles you have written. Please keep up the good work.

    Reply
  61. Charles Pullar

    Dear Dr Kendrick This is great news. Your silence has been causing us increasing concern. We hope you are in good spirits and can shrug off what must have been an extremely stressful time. Best wishes for the future. Charles Pullar Until Covid we used to visit Macclesfield from Surrey every 3 months for dinner with a group of friends.

    Reply
  62. Corinna Lennox-Kerr

    Dearest Malcolm,

    I can’t begin to tell you how moved Glynn and I are at this wonderful news. We know only too well the strain of standing your ground and going to Court to prove to anyone with even the smallest grain of intelligence, what is true and what is fact!

    It was only recently that our plumber popped in for a cup of tea and complaining about the terrible aches in his legs and the fact that he found it hard getting out of his chair and was hobbling, rather than walking. He is about 11st wet through, built like a greyhound, only in his late 50’s but looks younger and is usually brisk and breezy and fit as a flea. He went on to say that his GP was going to make him an appointment to see a vascular surgeon!!! We asked the question! “Has your Dr., by any chance put you on statins?” “Yes!”, he replied. We then suggested he stop taking them and that it wouldn’t be long before he’d know if these were the cause. He called in to see us a couple of weeks later to let us know that after he stopped the statins, within days, he was feeling his normal self again and now he felt fine. He said he was going back to see his Dr., and we suggested that he should not allow his Dr., to try and fob him off with trying to get him to take a different kind of statin.

    You are a hero and Zoe too. Thank you from the bottom of our hearts for standing up for the truth and the facts. Your work and books have saved countless lives.

    Corinna & Glynn

    Reply
  63. Graham

    Absolutely brilliant news for you both. They will not stop trying to label people anti-this or this-deniers to sell copy whilst perhaps ignorantly endangering the lives of their brain washed readership. Hope part 2 etc go just as well and your libel case is successful and you hurt them in their pockets !!

    Reply
  64. Joyce

    First and foremost Malcolm, I like to say you deserve NONE of the vitriolic bullshit you’ve received over the years from the likes of those “Career building Thugs”. How you (and, sadly many others) have tolerated this invasion and in many cases destruction of careers, is beyond me. Thank you for having the courage and guts to not bend the knee to these purveyors of lies, and not forgetting their “Masters” Big Pharma. I’ve followed your journey now for almost ten years, since my At Home Cardiac Arrest, and subsequent dealings with Heart Medication. Your courage knows no bounds, and I hope you can now feel SOME gratification after the recent Judgement. NEVER EVER give in to those Greedy for Power and Money. Thank you for everything! You helped me make some very sensible decisions over the years. 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 ❤️

    Reply
  65. Peter Downey

    Nice to have you back, Doctor.

    And brilliant, brilliant, brilliant.

    Maybe, just maybe, the days of my doctor, for the umpteenth time, reminding me that they have just noticed that my cholesterol is high and that I should…… .

    Reply
  66. tibolt1

    Congratulations Malcolm. Well done. I greatly admire you.

    We are blessed to have you, Zoe and a few other doctors courageous enough to put their heads above the parapet and tell the truth about what’s going on.

    You are a true doctor (as you know the word ‘doctor’ came from the Latin ‘to teach’) and your works have informed & positively impacted the lives of tens of thousands. A sincere thank you for all your great work.

    Must have been awful having had that hanging over your head.
    Wishing you good health & longevity.

    Reply
  67. G R HADFIELD

    Congratulations. I hope that the rest of the case goes in your favour too. As someone that has a deep loathing/scepticism of both Big Pharma and the mainstream media, I can’t tell you how pleased I am that you have been able to stand up to them both.

    Reply
  68. Mark Wilson

    I congratulate you on this judgement, Malcolm. I also bought Zoe’s book a decade ago and I had no idea you had been defamed in this way. I got offered statins yet again today and am confident I will turn them down again. You are a scholar and a gentleman and I salute you. I hope you get massive damages as the result of this.

    Reply
  69. Robert Dyson

    That must have been stressful. You have been in mind a lot over this blank writing period. It’s cheering that the British legal system is not bought by those with the most money.

    Reply
  70. helieo

    Je vous lis depuis au moins 25 ans. Votre rigueur, votre clairvoyance, votre honnêteté et votre humour m’empêchent de désespérer de la profession médicale ! Quelle belle victoire sur l’ignorance et la stupidité.

    Reply
      1. Susan

        Congratulations and thank you from across the pond!

        I suffered some mini-strokes recently and spent the night at the world renowned Mayo Clinic. Long story short … they tried to put the fear of God into me that without statins I would suffer another stroke, probably worse and probably sooner rather than later. I knew I couldn’t win the debate so took the prescription home and chucked it because I had read your book “The Clot Thickens” Almost a year later after using a holistic approach I am feeling great – and no side effects unlike so many family and friends on statins.

        I have recommended your book to many – a few takers but most are still caught in the pharma web so much work still to be done. Thank you for speaking truth to power at I’m sure great cost to you and your family – you are courageous and through your writings you pass that courage along to many, myself included! You are storing up treasures in heaven!

        Reply
  71. Neil

    Excellent news from Dr. Kendrick. In the past six months while this blog was suspended I’ve read his book ‘The Clot Thickens’ plus books by three other doctors:

    ‘How to Stop Your Doctor Killing You’

    Covid and the Global Predators’

    ‘Deadly Medicines and Organised Crime’.

    To anyone who used to believe in ‘modern medicine’ such books are a revelation.

    The past four years seem to have woken many up to the extent of the fraud and fakery in many fields, not just ‘medicine’ but ‘climate science’ and more.

    Reply
    1. Ric

      Agree on all points. The dam has broken. There are now so many well known doctors that are telling the same story about statins being useless if not outright harmful to many people.

      Well done Dr. Kendrick

      Reply
  72. Peter Ford

    Assange released. Dr Kendrick vindicated (Part 1). I am beginning to have my faith restored in the British injustice system.

    Reply
    1. Steve

      Peter. Re. Assange, nothing to do with the British Judiciary. He was essentially released/extradited to the USA where he pled guilty to one charge, was sentenced to five years, which he had served in Belmarsh, and then released.

      The UK effectively held Assange captive for 13 years for the USA, without any criminal charges against him. His crime: highlighting USA criminal activity.

      If you think the treatment of Dr Kendrick or Julian Assange or countless others shows we have a fair, honest and open judicial system, you are sadly mistaken.

      Reply
  73. Lily Woolfe

    For sometime now I have been unable to open your website. I don’t know whether google and safari have some kind of block.

    I am glad to hear the good news.

    Do you know how I may be able to access your website? Something in settings? A different browser, in which case which? Sneaking past the AI in a Trojan horse (original not code)?

    Thanks!

    Reply
  74. coachcaitlinmiller

    Congrats Malcolm! The Great Cholesterol Con literally saved my father’s life and I hand it out to anyone on statins who has not lost the ability to read more than 140 characters in one sitting. It’s truly shocking to witness what the Establishment is doing to its clueless citizenry—and what it will do to anyone trying to help us wake up. Onward!

    Reply
  75. Daniela Guazzini

    Dr Kendrick, i’m so happy yo hear that you got justice…finally. Cheers from a faithful italian follower.

    Reply
    1. AhNotepad

      Looks like a bit of blatant advertising to me. You could have posted your six relevant words without all the links to your businesses.

      Reply
  76. alandtapper1950

    Well done. Professional integrity in medicine and law defeats unprofessional journalism and unscrupulous Pharma.

    Reply
  77. Vivien

    I had no idea that you were going through this – I have often wondered what was going on as there was clearly something ….   I met you and saw you lecture several years ago and you have remained one of my go-to sources for honest, clear opinion and reporting.  I have always disbelieved (malbelieved, misbelieved, whatever) anything that I have read in the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday and despite two of my oldest friends reading these papers, I would also pretty much dismiss those who read them.  I am more than sorry that you have been so tainted by their crap journalism – it was clearly intended to do what it did and thereby it is a lie – and I have no doubt that Mr. Calman knew it to be so.  The damage that has been caused worldwide by dishonest journalism is to be on a par with governmental lies – dear God, and I say this as a patriot who tries to stay away from ‘conspiracy’ theories – trouble is nearly every single conspiracy has a kernel of truth at the very least.

    Is there anywhere I can contribute to a fighting fund? 

    With my very warmest wishes for you and your spirit ….(and of course your friends and family too) …

    Reply
    1. Dr. Malcolm Kendrick Post author

      Thanks. At present we are waiting for the Mail on Sunday (Associated newspapers) to respond to the judgement. They may appeal, they may not. The case may go on to a second hearing on ‘facts.’ This seems unlikely The law grindeth on at very slow speed. If this does go on, I may take up various people’s offer of a fighting fund.

      Reply
      1. AhNotepad

        Anna de Buisseret used giftsendgo after having problems with gofundme. If you start a fund, count me in.

        PS You could use a direct payment method such as a bank account to which we transfer funds, but you need advice from someone who knows the pitfalls of that. Wouldn’t surprise me if your son could advise.

        Reply
      2. Shaun Clark

        Go for it. Please. You have helped so many, and if not because of that, because of this. It can only help move the needle.

        Reply
  78. Pauline Sumner

    Thank you, I know you fight primarily for yourself but ultimately you are fighting for humanity. I appreciate what you are doing and I hope this trial get the media it deserves so that many many others can learn and appreciate too.

    Reply
  79. geoffroicc

    Dr. Kendrick,

    There was no guarantee that truth and rightness would prevail. I am so glad that it did!!

    I am also relieved to know that your silence stemmed from the legal case and not from your health! The world needs your voice more than ever!

    Reply
  80. John Barclay

    Thank you to Malcolm and Zoe for being beacons of truth , and upholding the real science and countering the profit generated nonsense they’ve been fighting against ! I bet there’s been no spike in heart attacks since their spreading of ‘misinformation’ , in fact it’d be v interesting to see the figures !

    Reply
  81. Robin Hull

    Malcolm,

    A relief indeed. So many thanks to you two and I hope you are both feeling you are getting your lives back. Would that you could say it’s all finally over.

    The trial was about the defamation of Malcolm and Zoë, not the value or otherwise of statins, (the elephants in the room). The third hero is Judge Nicklin; the fourth, Malcolm and Zoë’s legal team. My unending thanks to all of you therefore; it was a privilage to sit in court each day following this trial and now to be wreathed in smiles.

    While the judgement is cautious about the role of the case ‘Curistan -v- Times Newspapers Ltd’ [2009] in respect of reporting privilege, Judge Nicklin seems to have trodden very carefully, very completely and surely enough for Malcolm and Zoë to feel confident that their complaint of defamation will hold regardless of what Associated Newspapers Ltd. may choose to do next. What could they possibly hope to achieve? I have yet to see any report of the judgment in a national newspaper but technically I suppose the case is not yet over.

    Still, much cork-popping is in order. My very best to you. Robin.

    Reply
  82. Mark Macdonald

    The accuser doing what he accuses you of doing, according to the judge. Good case to give to people who can’t contemplate the reality of tainted mainstream messages on health

    Reply
  83. Catherine Collis

    excellent result and sorry to hear that you’ve had to go through what must have been a very tough time

    Reply
  84. henry

    Reading your first book many years ago I had the thought that you were too much of a threat to the Statin gravy train to be ignored so, like you, couldn’t have been altogether surprised by Calman’s attack.

    Some of his journalism is actually quite good, so what surprises me is that he didn’t study your material in depth and at least engage in an informed debate before sounding off (assuming he is qualified to do so).

    Unfortunately ad hominem attacks where fact based issues are are involved are ultimately sterile, as Mr Calman will find out when he has to to pay the price for his sloppiness.

    Reply
  85. Mary

    So glad to see the judgement in yours and Zoe’s favour. Sad for what ye have had to endure. Grateful to be able to benefit from your work.

    Massive thanks.

    Reply
  86. David Mulvaney

    Many congratulations on your victory, I hope ALL your criminal detractors fall like ninepins, they should all be in jail getting regular doses of the poisons the pushed on vulnerable, trusting people who in most cases were not suffering from anything serious. Your colleagues should be ashamed of themselves together with the B.M.A., W.H.O. etc.

    I was so lucky to be watching Sky News when you appeared to speak about your book but wished to speak to camera first. You have been my hero since. If there were more like you the world would be a far better place.

    I understand that ‘First do no harm’ has been consigned to the bin.

    Regards, Dave Mulvaney, Ireland

    Reply

Leave a comment