Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pim-light-08
review-ietf-pim-light-08-secdir-lc-lonvick-2024-11-06-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-pim-light
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2024-10-18
Requested 2024-10-04
Authors Hooman Bidgoli , Stig Venaas , Mankamana Prasad Mishra , Zhaohui (Jeffrey) Zhang , Mike McBride
I-D last updated 2024-11-06
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -06 by Henning Rogge (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Mallory Knodel (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Chris M. Lonvick (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Susan Hares (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -08 by Michael Tüxen (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Chris M. Lonvick
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-pim-light by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/YK73WuJ1MZnJ_716TG7k3ZypFXw
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 09)
Result Has issues
Completed 2024-11-06
review-ietf-pim-light-08-secdir-lc-lonvick-2024-11-06-00
Hello,

Apologies for the delay.

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments
were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document
editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call
comments.

The summary of the review is has issues.

I am not well versed in multicast so this may not be an actual issue. However,
I'm not seeing anything that will prevent a replay attack other than the use of
IPSec as described in RFC 5796. If this is not an actual concern then this may
be disregarded.

Best regards,
Chris