Municipal elections in San Francisco, California (2014)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
2015


2014 Elections for Mayors and City CouncilsMunicipal Government Final.png

Municipal Elections
2014 Elections By State
2014 Elections By Date
Recent News

2014 Elections
AnaheimAnchorage
ArlingtonAustinBakersfield
ChandlerChesapeake
Chula VistaCorpus Christi
FremontFresnoGarland
GilbertGlendaleHonolulu
IrvineIrvingLaredo
LexingtonLong Beach
LouisvilleLubbockMesa
New OrleansNewarkNorfolk
OaklandOklahoma City
OrlandoPortlandReno
SacramentoSan Antonio
San Bernardino
San DiegoSan Francisco
San JoseSanta Ana
ScottsdaleStocktonTulsa
Virginia Beach
Washington, D.C.

Note: Cities listed in this box are those among the 100 largest in the United States that held elections in 2014.

The city of San Francisco, California, held nonpartisan elections for the Board of Supervisors on November 4, 2014. The filing deadline for candidates wishing to run in this election was June 10, 2014.[1]

San Francisco utilized ranked-choice voting for municipal offices, eliminating the need for runoff elections.[1]

Five seats were up for election. These included Districts 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10.

Incumbents ran for re-election in each district.

Three key issues shaping San Francisco's 2014 election cycle were affordability, transportation and a proposed soda-tax.

Board of Supervisors

Note: Because San Francisco is both a city and a county, it is governed by a Board of Supervisors rather than a city council.

Candidate list

District 2

November 4 General election candidates:

District 4

November 4 General election candidates:

  • Katy Tang Green check mark transparent.png - Incumbent Tang was first appointed to the board in 2013.

District 6

November 4 General election candidates:

District 8

November 4 General election candidates:

District 10

November 4 General election candidates:

Election results

San Francisco Board of Supervisors, District 2, 2014
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.pngMark Farrell Incumbent 78.6% 15,546
Juan-Antonio Carballo 20.7% 4,090
Write-in 0.7% 141
Total Votes 19,777
Source: San Francisco Board of Elections - Official 2014 election results
San Francisco Board of Supervisors, District 4, 2014
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.pngKaty Tang Incumbent 96.7% 14,981
Write-in 3.3% 511
Total Votes 15,492
Source: San Francisco Board of Elections - Official 2014 election results
San Francisco Board of Supervisors, District 6, 2014
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.pngJane Kim Incumbent 67.4% 8,827
Michael Nulty 11.2% 1,467
Jamie Whitaker 11.1% 1,458
David Carlos Salaverry 9.2% 1,210
Write-in 1% 130
Total Votes 13,092
Source: San Francisco Board of Elections - Official 2014 election results
San Francisco Board of Supervisors, District 8, 2014
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.pngScott Wiener Incumbent 77.7% 22,854
Michael Petrelis 6.8% 2,004
Tom Wayne Basso 5.3% 1,574
George Davis 4.7% 1,372
John Nulty 4.6% 1,359
Write-in 0.9% 261
Total Votes 29,163
Source: San Francisco Board of Elections - Official 2014 election results
See also: Ranked-choice voting

Ranked-choice voting allows voters to select up to three candidates on the ballot and to rank them from one to three. After the polls have closed, if a single candidate has received a majority (50%) of first place votes, that candidate is declared the winner. If no candidate has received a majority of first place votes, this triggers an elimination process. In the elimination process, the candidate with the fewest amount of first place votes is removed. Then, the second place votes on the ballots that ranked the eliminated candidate first are transferred to the respective candidates and calculated as first place votes. This process continues until a single candidate holds a majority. In ranked-choice voting, transfer refers to votes being moved from a defeated candidate to the next person on a voter's preference list, while exhausted refers to votes for candidates removed from the pool because there are no candidates left on a voter's preference list to transfer them to.

Legend:     Eliminated in current round     Most votes     Lost






This is the first round of voting. To view subsequent rounds, click the [show] button next to that round.

San Francisco Board of Supervisors, District 10, 2014, Round 1
Candidate Vote % Votes Transfer
Malia Cohen - Most votes 46.6% 7,176 543
Shawn M. Richard - Eliminated 6.5% 995 −995
Ed Donaldson - Eliminated 5.3% 809 −809
Marlene Tran 17.7% 2,725 222
Tony Kelly 24% 3,701 558
Write-in - Eliminated 0% 0 0
Exhausted 936 481
Total Votes 16,342 0
Note: Negative numbers in the transfer total are due to exhaustion by overvotes.

This is the final round of voting. To view previous rounds, click the [show] button next to that round.

San Francisco Board of Supervisors, District 10, 2014, Final Round
Candidate Vote % Votes Transfer
Malia Cohen - Winner 51.7% 7,719 0
Shawn M. Richard 0% 0 0
Ed Donaldson 0% 0 0
Marlene Tran - Eliminated 19.7% 2,947 0
Tony Kelly - Eliminated 28.5% 4,259 0
Write-in 0% 0 0
Exhausted 1,417 0
Total Votes 16,342 0
Note: Negative numbers in the transfer total are due to exhaustion by overvotes.

Issues

Affordability

San Francisco is well known for its high cost of living.[2] The finance site Nerdwallet.com, in fact, ranked it fourth in the nation in 2013, just slightly behind other metropolitan areas such as New York City and Los Angeles, California.[3] How to deal with this problem and how to make sure that San Francisco remains affordable for all of its citizens were key questions in San Francisco's 2014 elections.

Much of the conversation about affordability in the 2014 election cycle revolved around a November 4 ballot measure called "Proposition G." Proposition G targeted real-estate speculation - which some suspected of contributing to frequent evictions and the city's high cost of living - by establishing a tax on "short term flips." City council candidates were divided on the measure and the impact that it could have on housing, affordability and home-ownership.[4]

Transportation

Transportation was another issue in the 2014 elections. A ballot measure called "Proposition L" asked voters in November to decide whether the city should be prohibited from charging parking meter fees on Sundays, holidays and on weekdays outside the hours of 9 a.m and 6 p.m.. Proposition L also reassessed the city's ability to install new parking meters in neighborhoods and to increase parking rates. Supporters of the plan argued that it would help alleviate some of the city's affordability problems, while opponents argued that it would add to the city's traffic congestion and divert funds from public transportation. The issue was a frequent topic of discussion amongst city council candidates.[5][6]

Soda-Tax

A third issue was a proposed tax on soda in the city. In July the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted 6 to 4 to place a measure called "Proposition E" on the November ballot, which imposed a two percent per ounce tax on soda and other comparable beverages. The funds generated from the tax would go to health programs.

City councils candidates were sharply divided on Proposition E. Supporters argued that the tax would help prevent sugar related illnesses - especially amongst children - such as diabetes and obesity. Opponents, on the other hand, questioned the efficacy of a tax in dealing with these types of problems.[7]

Recent news

This section links to a Google news search for the term San + Francisco + California + election


See also

External links

Footnotes