Millicent Hall

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the individual's last campaign covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Millicent Hall
Image of Millicent Hall
Elections and appointments
Last election

November 8, 2022

Education

Associate

Pima Community College

Bachelor's

University of Phoenix

Contact

float:right;
border:1px solid #FFB81F;
background-color: white;
width: 250px;
font-size: .9em;
margin-bottom:0px;

} .infobox p { margin-bottom: 0; } .widget-row { display: inline-block; width: 100%; margin-top: 1px; margin-bottom: 1px; } .widget-row.heading { font-size: 1.2em; } .widget-row.value-only { text-align: center; background-color: grey; color: white; font-weight: bold; } .widget-row.value-only.white { background-color: #f9f9f9; } .widget-row.value-only.black { background-color: #f9f9f9; color: black; } .widget-row.Democratic { background-color: #003388; color: white; font-weight: bold; } .widget-row.Republican { background-color: red; color: white; font-weight: bold; } .widget-row.Independent, .widget-row.Nonpartisan, .widget-row.Constitution { background-color: grey; color: white; font-weight: bold; } .widget-row.Libertarian { background-color: #f9d334; color: black; font-weight: bold; } .widget-row.Green { background-color: green; color: white; font-weight: bold; } .widget-key { width: 43%; display: inline-block; padding-left: 10px; vertical-align: top; font-weight: bold; } .widget-value { width: 57%; float: right; display: inline-block; padding-left: 10px; word-wrap: break-word; } .widget-img { width: 150px; display: block; margin: auto; } .clearfix { clear: both; }

Millicent Hall (Democratic Party) ran for election to the Maryland House of Delegates to represent District 4. She lost in the general election on November 8, 2022.

Biography

Email [email protected] to notify us of updates to this biography.

Hall holds an associate degree in liberal arts from Pima Community College. She later earned a B.S. in public administration from the University of Phoenix. Hall teaches Sunday school courses at the Evangelical Lutheran Church. She and her husband, Doug, have two children.[1]

Elections

2022

See also: Maryland House of Delegates elections, 2022

General election

General election for Maryland House of Delegates District 4 (3 seats)

The following candidates ran in the general election for Maryland House of Delegates District 4 on November 8, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Silhouette Placeholder Image.png
Jesse Pippy (R)
 
19.1
 
30,670
Image of April Fleming Miller
April Fleming Miller (R)
 
18.5
 
29,717
Image of Barrie Ciliberti
Barrie Ciliberti (R)
 
18.5
 
29,705
Image of Andrew Duck
Andrew Duck (D)
 
15.2
 
24,489
Image of Millicent Hall
Millicent Hall (D)
 
14.5
 
23,361
Silhouette Placeholder Image.png
Brandon Duck (D)
 
14.1
 
22,628
 Other/Write-in votes
 
0.1
 
93

Total votes: 160,663
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for Maryland House of Delegates District 4 (3 seats)

Andrew Duck, Millicent Hall, and Brandon Duck advanced from the Democratic primary for Maryland House of Delegates District 4 on July 19, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Andrew Duck
Andrew Duck
 
34.3
 
7,764
Image of Millicent Hall
Millicent Hall
 
34.1
 
7,703
Silhouette Placeholder Image.png
Brandon Duck
 
31.6
 
7,137

Total votes: 22,604
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for Maryland House of Delegates District 4 (3 seats)

Incumbent Jesse Pippy, April Fleming Miller, and incumbent Barrie Ciliberti defeated Heath Barnes in the Republican primary for Maryland House of Delegates District 4 on July 19, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Silhouette Placeholder Image.png
Jesse Pippy
 
33.4
 
10,450
Image of April Fleming Miller
April Fleming Miller
 
25.8
 
8,055
Image of Barrie Ciliberti
Barrie Ciliberti
 
23.5
 
7,361
Image of Heath Barnes
Heath Barnes
 
17.3
 
5,398

Total votes: 31,264
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

2014

See also: Frederick County Public Schools elections (2014)

The June 24, 2014, primary ballot included incumbents Colleen E. Cusimano, April Fleming Miller and Brad W. Young as well as challengers Liz Barrett, Jonathan C. Carothers, Mike Ferrell, Millicent Hall, Kenneth Kerr and Richard S. Vallaster III. Board member Jean A. Smith did not file for re-election. All of the primary candidates except Carothers faced off in the general election on November 4, 2014.

Incumbents Brad W. Young and Colleen E. Cusimano, along with newcomers Liz Barrett and Kenneth Kerr, won the general election.

Results

General
Frederick County Public Schools, At-Large General Election, 4-year term, 2014
Party Candidate Vote % Votes
     Nonpartisan Green check mark transparent.pngLiz Barrett 15.5% 35,673
     Nonpartisan Green check mark transparent.pngBrad W. Young Incumbent 14.2% 32,632
     Nonpartisan Green check mark transparent.pngColleen E. Cusimano Incumbent 13.6% 31,147
     Nonpartisan Green check mark transparent.pngApril Fleming Miller Incumbent 12.9% 29,700
     Nonpartisan Ken Kerr 12.9% 29,657
     Nonpartisan Mike Ferrell 11.4% 26,104
     Nonpartisan Millicent Hall 10.4% 23,984
     Nonpartisan Richard S. Vallaster III 8.9% 20,470
     Nonpartisan Write-in 0.2% 422
Total Votes 229,789
Source: Frederick County Board of Elections, "2014 Gubernatorial General Election Results," accessed December 20, 2014
Primary

Funding

Hall reported $129.00 in contributions and $5.98 in expenditures to the Maryland State Board of Elections, leaving her campaign with $344.32 on hand as of June 9, 2014. This total includes amounts remaining from previous filing periods.[2]

Endorsements

Hall received the endorsement of the Frederick County Teachers Association (FCTA) prior to the primary election.[3]

Campaign themes

2022

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Millicent Hall did not complete Ballotpedia's 2022 Candidate Connection survey.

2014

Hall explained her themes for the 2014 race on her campaign website:

Community Involvement

  • We need more community involvement. When a community comes together to support education, then real change can occur. When the community votes for government leaders who value education, then education will be funded. When parents are involved in their children's education, then the children will do better. When a parent can't be there, having quality community centers or community programs can help ensure those students stay on a path to success. When a community is educated and aware of the benefits that come from having quality education, then the entire community will grow and prosper. Education is a path to overall community wellness; and when the community members feel heard and know that their voice and vote will matter, then we will have real change.
  • Our schools are dealing with the challenges presented by poverty on a daily basis. This effects our children and their ability to succeed. Currently 26% of the students in Frederick County schools live below the poverty line. Our schools need to be prepared for the effects that poverty has on our children and have programs in place to address the students' needs.
  • Frederick County is experiencing a growing problem with drugs, and that is being reflected in our schools. Our schools current outdated drug awareness program is not sufficient to address the current drug issues. The education system must work with the community and law enforcement to help tackle this issue by providing drug prevention education, treatment for addicts and enforcement of the laws to get dealers at bay.

Early Intervention

  • This is a passionate issue for me. I was diagnosed with dyslexia in kindergarten and received services immediately. That early intervention allowed me to have future academic success, including honors classes in high school, graduating with Honors from Pima Community College and going on to earn a Bachelors' Degree. There is a movement within education to wait until second grade before evaluating students for learning disabilities (and in some cases for giftedness). If problems can be identified earlier, that allows more time for specialized help and treatment. In my case, I was passing, but struggling. With help, I went from struggling to succeeding; and I want others to have access to that type of help. Every student should have access to supportive services. I have a daughter with a speech delay, and her access to intervention through the county and school system has been a valuable asset.
  • Currently standardized testing is being heavily relied on to evaluate the quality of education and educators, when in reality no set of tests can give an accurate depiction of everyday life inside the classroom. There are students who start at a disadvantage, whether it be from environmental factors such as poverty or from a physical, mental or learning disability, and those disadvantages aren't taken into account when giving a "standardized" test. These tests don't account for students who are making marked improvements but are still falling short of what is deemed the average. They also can't measure attributes such as creativity or innovation. These tests often result in penalizing schools that need the most support. Rating entire schools based on a single set of tests, which don't consider the makeup or challenges of the those schools, sets up the education system for failure. Additionally, the results of these standardized tests don't seem to be used to improve education. Too much of our resources are devoted to the administration and grading of these tests, instead of being used to educate our children.
  • I was appalled to hear in a recent meeting that there are plans to start doing simple one line questions for standardized tests on pre-K and kindergarten students. These students are just beginning to learn basic social skills, such as sharing, waiting in line and taking turns. Pre-K and kindergarten has become increasingly academic without any assurance that these new standards will lead to future academic success. Free play, such as recess, has been shown to increase performance on literacy tasks, increase class participation and decrease fidgeting, especially in students with hyperactivity (Jarrett, 2013). Children, especially the youngest students, can benefit by learning through play. We want the youngest students to want to learn, to be engaged at their level – and often that means through imaginative play.

Adequate Funding

  • Our teachers are our most important asset, and in order for FCPS to keep and attract quality teachers, we must offer competitive salaries and benefits. These teachers are in the classroom every day interacting with students – getting to know them, helping them, and growing each student's knowledge and love of learning. They deserve a fair compensation for all that they do for our children and in turn for our community. Quality teachers deserve quality pay.
  • FCPS technology is underwhelming. Both the students and staff are suffering due to outdated technology. Computer labs frequently have computers that simply don't work. To do evaluations for teachers, staff must carry their systems from class to class, find an outlet to plug into to get on the network, log on and then start the evaluation process. Upgrading schools to allow for wifi, as has been done at a few schools for the Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) programs, has been shown to benefit both students and staff. Additionally, as our world becomes increasingly tech savvy, so must the students. Upgrading technology would allow for more students to take more technical classes, such as writing code, at both middle and high school levels. Better technology can also be used to help benefit ELL who can use e-textbooks that can help translate difficult to understand concepts into their native language. There could be endless uses for iPads in the special education classes. FCPS is behind the technological curve, and that will begin to have an impact on students. Upgrading technology is essential.

[4]

—Millicent Hall's campaign website, (2014)

[5]

What was at stake?

Issues in the election

June 2 candidate forum

Frederick Classical Charter School hosted a candidate forum on June 2, 2014 featuring all nine board candidates on the primary ballot. The candidates agreed on general principles related to charter school development including the necessity of parental choice. Most candidates also agreed that the state's approach to charter schools does not provide enough independence for local parents and education officials. Millicent Hall argued that state laws governing charter schools need to remain rigorous to ensure education quality. April Fleming Miller pointed out that the state's strict rules for charter approval yielded three successful charter schools in the county rather than allowing a flood of inadequate charter options. Hall, Kenneth Kerr and Liz Barrett received endorsements from the Frederick County Teachers Association (FCTA) but asserted their independence from outside influences during the forum. Incumbents Miller, Colleen E. Cusimano and Brad W. Young stated earlier in the forum that the FCTA was actively opposed to charter school expansion in the county.[6]

See also


External links

   .contact_entity {font-size: 1.5em ;margin-top: 0.6em; margin-bottom: 0em;margin-right: 0.5em;}
   .contact_office { margin-top: 0.3em; margin-bottom: 0em;margin-right: 0.5em;}
   .external_links_table { width: auto !important; }
   @media (max-width:600px) {
       .contact_entity {font-size: 1.0em ;margin-top: 0.6em; margin-bottom: 0em; margin-right: 0.5em;}
       .contact_office { font-size: 0.8 em; margin-top: 0.6em; margin-bottom: 0em;margin-right: 0.5em;}  
   }

Footnotes


Current members of the Maryland House of Delegates
Leadership
Speaker of the House:Adrienne Jones
Majority Leader:David Moon
Representatives
District 1A
District 1B
District 1C
District 2A
District 2B
District 3
Kris Fair (D)
Ken Kerr (D)
District 4
District 6
Bob Long (R)
District 7A
District 7B
District 8
District 9A
Chao Wu (D)
District 9B
District 11A
District 11B
District 12A
District 12B
District 13
District 15
Lily Qi (D)
District 16
District 17
Joe Vogel (D)
District 18
District 21
District 23
District 24
District 25
District 26
District 27A
District 27B
District 27C
District 28
District 29A
District 29B
District 29C
District 30A
District 30B
District 31
District 32
District 33A
District 33B
District 33C
District 34A
District 34B
District 35A
District 35B
District 36
District 37A
District 37B
District 38A
District 38B
Vacant
District 38C
District 39
Greg Wims (D)
District 40
District 41
District 42A
District 42B
District 42C
District 43A
District 43B
District 44A
District 44B
District 45
District 46
District 47A
District 47B
Democratic Party (102)
Republican Party (38)
Vacancies (1)