æ¨æ¥ã¨ã³ããªã§12/22ãµãã¼ãºè«èª¬ãå·¡ãã¯ã«ã¼ã°ãã³ã¨ããã³ã°ã®ããåãã«è§¦ãããããã®ä¸ã§ããã³ã°ã以ä¸ã®ãããªãã¨ãæ¸ãã¦ããã Since 1999, Paul has changed his mind. He has become an aggressive advocate of expansionary fiscal policy as the preferred solution. Why? And is he right to have done so? Or should he have stuck to his 1999 position, and should he still be lining up with Ken today? ï¼æè¨³ï¼ 1999å¹´*1以éããã¼ã«ã¯èããå¤ãããå½¼ã¯æ¡å¼µç財æ¿æ¿çãã好ã¾ããæ¿çã ã¨ç©æ¥µçã«å±ããããã«ãªã£ããä½æ ãï¼ããã
{{#tags}}- {{label}}
{{/tags}}