Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

Betting the Farm on the Imaginary War

The Highway of Death, Iraq War, 1991
By William Schryver – imetatronink – November 4, 2024

It has now been ten years since I first turned my attention to the necessity of prudent financial investments in order to both preserve and hopefully enlarge the modest amount of wealth I had accumulated up to that time. I began by attempting to identify the wisest and most discerning “experts” in the field. This was no easy trick.

Fortunately, in the ten years preceding my late-2014 awakening to the importance of financial and macroeconomic matters, I had spent several years discovering that most of western academia is a sham dominated by highly credentialled ignoramuses. Therefore I was alerted to the likelihood that the so-called “experts” in other fields of study were similarly intellectually impaired, regardless of their seemingly impressive curricula vitae, how many framed certificates hung on their wall, and the size of their “assets under management”.

That said, it became apparent over time that even those I initially identified as reliable “experts” could be well-informed most of the time, and yet still be subject to blind spots that rendered them susceptible to fatal errors which could often nullify their seemingly correct judgment of everything else.

In the context of financial matters, it must be understood that the “Quantitative Easing” and near-zero interest rates that followed on the heels of the so-called “Great Financial Crisis” of 2007-2009 was a tide that floated a great many boats captained by fools whose folly would not be recognized until the consequences of central bank profligacy were revealed several years further down the road.

Even so, most of the investment “gurus” whose analysis I had come to respect managed to successfully navigate the hurricane of price inflation that roared ashore in the wake of the Covid hysteria – a storm that was then followed by the Federal Reserve’s subsequent raising of interest rates in a frantic attempt to stem the inflationary tide.

Then World War Three began.

Of course, even at this point, almost three years into that war, few people recognize it for what it is. Even fewer recognize the degree to which the geopolitical and military parameters of war itself have been radically altered in comparison to what they were during the “American Unipolar Interregnum” that commenced with the dissolution of the Soviet Union.

Indeed, the overwhelming majority of Americans believe the “unipolar moment” continues essentially intact and unthreatened. In the highly insulated environs of Wall Street and Silicon Valley, faith in the overwhelming supremacy of American high-tech and military prowess remains almost entirely unshaken, notwithstanding the ever-increasing indications to the contrary – things about which I have been writing for several years now.

Most of the gods of American high-tech and finance, and those who worship them, simply cannot discern the degree to which American power in all its forms has steadily eroded over the course of the 21st century, and that this erosion has accelerated dramatically in recent years.

For most of the western elite and their acolytes, it is still early 1991, and Norman Schwarzkopf is leading a million-man army against the hapless Iraqis in a demonstration of military might that would finally expunge the bitter humiliation of Vietnam from the American psyche.

Such people have religiously embraced the Hollywood fantasies of unassailable American superpower dominance. And given the reality that Ukraine and Israel are considered merely appendages of this assumed American military supremacy, the eastern European and Levantine theaters of World War Three have given rise to extreme examples of an unprecedented tsunami of propaganda I have been wont to call “The Imaginary War”.

This phrase I coined in the early stages of the war in Ukraine has its origins in something allegedly said by an unnamed Israeli general in the aftermath of the 2006 war in southern Lebanon – a war whose ultimate outcome was a decisive strategic defeat for Israel, but which the Israelis subsequently attempted to spin into a great victory. It was in this context that the Israeli general reportedly said, “If you can’t win a real war, win an imaginary one.”

This is precisely the narrative-building approach we have seen in Ukraine over the past two-plus years.

Most Americans, and most people around the world who believe in mainstream western narratives, are convinced that the Russians have been dealt an overwhelming strategic defeat in Ukraine; that the Russian military has been exposed as a poorly trained drunken mob; that Russian military doctrine is imbecilic; that Russian equipment is junk; that Russian military technology is decades behind its western counterparts; that American and other NATO war toys sent to Ukraine have dominated the battlefield, etc., etc.

The same types of things are believed about China, its culture, and its military capabilities.

And, of course, even greater derision is directed towards the Iranians and the North Koreans.

Just today I read a short article from a fairly prominent Wall Street hedge fund CIO, in which he wrote the following paragraph of utterly fictitious (and yet widely believed) nonsense:

Israel sent 100 aircraft for a 2000km flight to attack Tehran. Zero were shot down. First, the IDF took out Iran’s air defenses. Those Russian S-300 anti-aircraft systems can now be found disassembled in large craters through the region (Russia’s newer S-400 system underperformed expectations in Ukraine and the S-500 is in test phase). With Iran’s air defenses offline, Israeli aircraft had their way with whatever targets they chose in Tehran. They skipped over the mullahs this time. Next time who knows. Such is the nature of warfare for those with superior tech.

Never mind that literally ALL of his assertions are demonstrably false – this would-be titan of American finance intends to bet the farm on the fallacious assumptions of the imaginary wars he has convinced himself are actually taking place.

Of course, both the major party candidates for President, almost the entirety of the United States Congress, and much of the sprawling swamp of American government bureaucracy in Washington are similarly convinced of the indomitability of American imperial military might, and they are anxious to teach the current “axis of evil” in Moscow, Beijing, and Tehran a lesson they will not soon forget.

In the end – and it will come sooner than later – the only thing that will not be soon forgotten is how briefly the American unipolar moment endured, and how shockingly and suddenly it all came crashing down.

November 4, 2024 - Posted by | Economics, Militarism | , , , , ,

1 Comment »

  1. “.. Of course, both the major party candidates for President, almost the entirety of the United States Congress, and much of the sprawling swamp of American government bureaucracy in Washington are similarly convinced of the indomitability of American imperial military might, and they are anxious to teach the current “axis of evil” in Moscow, Beijing, and Tehran a lesson they will not soon forget. …”

    I commented yesterday in response to similar nonsense about BRICS.

    “Even with their growing clout, however, the BRICS can’t replace the U.S. as a new global hegemon. They simply lack the military, financial, and technological power to defeat the U.S. or even to threaten its vital interests.”

    Prof. Sachs is usually right, particularly in his analysis of past events, but he is wearing blinkers when making prophecies.

    Militarily, any one of Russia, China or Iran can and will defeat US-NATO (the West) in any battle, land, sea or air. Combined, a conflict is a foregone conclusion with the West in ruins. Sure the west can inflict pain, the ‘carpet of bombs’ which is their only weapon, kills innocents and degrades infrastructure, but it has never defeated an enemy. Not N Korea, not Vietnam, not Iraq, not Syria, not Donbass, not even Gaza, so the idea that the West has a credible military ‘existential’ threat is just ridiculous. They can inflict pain and suffering, but in it’s wake, it leaves an enemy far more determined (do you really think killing my wife and children is going to make me surrender and ‘love’ you?) and far more ruthless.

    Financially, the West has ‘shot it’s bolt’. It has imposed unbelievable sanctions at national level, corporate level and even individuals level and whilst they can cause some temporary inconvenience, they do not stop whatever action they supposedly aim at. From Mexican drug dealers, Russian or Chinese oligarchs, to nations like Iran, after a few weeks or months, all that happens is better ways are invented to achieve the financial purposes of the targets. Iranian and Russian energy exports clearly demonstrate the impotence of financial measures. Sure you can steal a few boats and even ‘freeze’ enemy assets, but then you find the boats don’t matter and the enemy holds more of your assets than you do of his. It is called ‘shooting yourself in the foot’ and when that doesn’t work, you have to ‘aim higher’ and higher until eventually you shoot your self in the head.

    Technologically the ‘Rest’ have either caught up, or exceeded the West. Sure they do not have the means to observe the Higgs Boson, but their manufacture of goods, weapons and infrastructure is way in advance of anything the west has or can produce. The West has/had a temporary advantage in electronics, but whilst the West turned out a million lawyers from their universities, the Rest turned out 5 million engineers. The west will fall way behind and will take 300 years to change the culture back to the wonders of Bohr, Einstein, Feynman et al.

    It may take 5 years, 10 or even 15 years but the BRICS ideology and the 85% of the world’s population will lead for next 200 – 300 years. The Orthodox Christian morality of Russia, the Confucianism of China and the Peace and Charity ethics of Islam (hopefully) will become the norm, perhaps for the promised ‘1,000 years of peace’.

    “Through Russia comes the hope of the world. Not in respect to what is sometimes termed Communism or Bolshevism — no! But freedom — freedom! That each man will live for his fellow man. The principle has been born there. It will take years for it to be crystallized; yet out of Russia comes again the hope of the world.”  ~

    Edgar Cayce circa 1935

    “… in the words of the Darqawi Sufi teacher Ahmad ibn Ajiba, “a science through which one can know how to travel into the presence of the Divine, purify one’s inner self from filth, and beautify it with a variety of praiseworthy traits”.

     
    “The way of the superior person is threefold; virtuous, they are free from anxieties; wise they are free from perplexities; and bold they are free from fear.”
    ― Confucius

    Like

    Comment by peterjohnarnold | November 5, 2024 | Reply


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.