You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. Dismiss alert
The fact that the native :has pseudo-class: https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors/#relational takes forgiving-relative-selector-list as an argument: https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors/#forgiving-selector means the contents are not validated. jQuery has supported the :has pseudo-class for ages. However, its support is more powerful; in particular, it allows for jQuery extensions like :contains to appe
Currently, the spec sends mixed signals to programmers about the with statement; this PR attempts to clear up the ambiguity by adding text that explicitly discourages the use of the with statement in new ECMAScript code. This is an attempt to solve a specific problem: developers and technical writers are unclear about the status of the with statement. See this StackOverflow question or this discus
/CC @cpearce @jernoble With autoplay policies, a media element may not be allowed to play depending on various rules: browser setting, user behaviour on the page, etc. It was suggested to expose this as a permission but because the behaviour is often dependant on past user behaviour on the page [1], it may makes sense to expose the information at a media element level. @cpearce suggested canAutopl
For small changes to ECMAScript, you can contribute by filing an issue or a pull request against the current text of ECMA-262 standard in this repository. To file an issue, go to the ecma262 issues page. From there, search in the existing issues to see if an issue already exists to track your problem. If so, add a comment to the existing issue; otherwise, file a new issue documenting the problem.
ã©ã³ãã³ã°
é害
ã©ã³ãã³ã°
ãªãªã¼ã¹ãé害æ å ±ãªã©ã®ãµã¼ãã¹ã®ãç¥ãã
ææ°ã®äººæ°ã¨ã³ããªã¼ã®é ä¿¡
å¦çãå®è¡ä¸ã§ã
j次ã®ããã¯ãã¼ã¯
kåã®ããã¯ãã¼ã¯
lãã¨ã§èªã
eã³ã¡ã³ãä¸è¦§ãéã
oãã¼ã¸ãéã
{{#tags}}- {{label}}
{{/tags}}