Re: Not like you'd do it yourself
I suspect ElReg would point at you and laugh in these very pages.
28820 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Jun 2007
Marketing will still figure out how to make the Great Unwashed think they need a new telly every couple years. It's the only way to keep the market growing.
Me, I'll stick to my 32" Sony Trinitron from 1988. I only watch the news or baseball anyway ... and that rarely. Both are better on the radio.
Calvados/applejack experiment is coming along slowly. We have about a hundred gallons of 110 proof booze from four vintages aging in 2.5 gallon oak casks down in the wine cellar (43F/6C). Last year's is rocket fuel crossed with paint stripper at the moment, but the four year old is coming along quite nicely, if sipped over ice. We know the process works, the only question is will it age out to a marketable product.
Yes, it's all legal and above board. The process itself is easy, but the .gov insists on making life difficult. The paperwork is a bitch, and we have to pay all excise taxes. And we're not licensed to allow the end product off the premises yet. Onwards & upwards ...
systemd-free Devuan Linux hits version 1.0.0
I run Slackware. The vi clone is elvis. The arrow keys work ... if the keybr0ad has arrow keys, of course. I rarely find myself reaching for them, though, unless I'm in input mode ;-)
Seriously, try using vi as your shell. You'll be awfully surprised at how functional it is. For test purposes, create a user account with a vi shell. Pull up an xterm & log into that account. See what you can (and cannot) do with vi as your day-to-day CLI shell ... At the very least, you'll learn a lot more about vi than most folks. The concept was suggested to me in jest decades ago (1979ish) when a friend commented that "You seem to live in vi! When was the last time you saw a shell prompt?"
No, no, no! Use vi as your shell! :-)
From one of my passwd files:
write:x:1007:101:,,,:/home/write:/usr/bin/vi
Yes, that's really a user account that I use ... usually on a dumb terminal. I don't like distractions when I'm writing more than throw-away comments, like this one.
To be sure, Canadians are simply disarmed Americans with health care.
That said, most of my Canadian friends, when referring to us decoratively, use the term "Yanks", same as everyone else. Strangely enough, most of us Yanks don't find the term any more derogatory than most Canadians find the term Canuck derogatory.
Beer. Because if you share a border, life's much happier if you can also share a beer.
"water molecules from fruit are not "indistinguishable' from water molecules from a tap"
Horseshit. H2O is H2O.
Contaminants in that water, on the other hand, vary from location to location. Measure the ratios of certain contaminants, and you might be able to tell how much water was added by the wine maker. Note the might, it's not a sure bet. How do I know? I make wine as part of my living.
Also note that most wine here in California has at least some water added to the must during fermentation. If you don't add the water, you'll wind up with a "stuck" fermentation due to the high sugar content of our local grapes. See this web page for some details:
https://www.winebusiness.com/tools/?go=winemaking.calc&cid=5
In the gripping hand, beer :-)
I actually posted the above 5 days ago. At the time, it was relevant to the article, which has since been re-written. Why ElReg chooses to allow it to be posted today, 5 days after it was nixxed (presumably for "correcting the author"), and after it made any coherent sense with respect to said article, is anybody's guess.