Re: The real question is...
Speaking as someone who spent way too many hours in the back of a Bandit (2 hour flights to/from the middle of nowhere), you have my sympathies.
How is your hearing?
16473 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Feb 2008
"The obvious solution to this problem is to ban the production of stock photos of cheerful people in brightly-lit offices with telephone headsets - without them, there'd be no way for the scammers to make their web pages."
The "WhoStoleMyPhotos" extension is useful to see which stock supplier they're using (usually ShutterStock).
I've never had one of these calls, but I've seen people fall for these, pyramid and various employment scams, As another poster has noted, teachers seem particularly susceptible to these kinds of con artists.
"They (china) have invaded..."
Perhaps one should look at how many countries the USA has invaded - starting with Canada - and let's not forget that small war with Spain, started by a newspaper baron after a US Navy ship's boiler exploded whilst in Havana port, in order to sell more papers.
"Of course, the Goths and the Vandals and the Huns saw this for what it was - weakness. And the rest is history."
Funnily enough the first thing the Vandals did after taking over Rome was to start repairing the infrastructure - it hadn't been maintained for a couple of centuries and was on the verge of falling apart.
I wonder if the same thing would happen this time around (all those collapsing bridges...)
Where was the motivation? Many VMS and Tru64 and NSK customers were happy with their existing software and hardware. What did IA64 bring most of them, even if the port was trivial? (can't speak for HPUX).
There was a positive discincentive. We decided not to update our Alpha VMS systems to Itanium because it was so fricking expensive. The alpha boxes are still going but their disks are now dying and once they're gone, they'll be gone forever. So much for "VMS until 2036"
someone remembers when it was common to say "RISC CPUs are far better then Intel CISC ones! They are the future!",
x86 were and are amongst the least efficient chips out there, in terms of clocks per instruction and in terms of power consumption.
However they were _far_ cheaper than the competition and as such became ubiqutous.. In the end, that's what counted more than anything else.
"I notice a particular ISP isn't advertising itself on the basis that it is from Yorkshire anymore"
They don't advertise that they're a BT subsidiary either (I suspect if they did, their customers would leave in droves).
In the same way AOL doesn't advertise that it's a trading unit of TalkTalk (AOL sold out its european ops years ago)
"Fortunately there are many nations around the world with various rare earth ores. Unfortunately the pollution required to do the mining is so monumental that most nations require pollution controls that are not economically feasible."
The "pollution" mostly comes down to haveing undesirable byproducts - virtually all of that is Thorium - and no place to put them without the stuff leeching into waterways.
Thorium is likely to become very useful within the next 15-20 years if Gen4-5 molten salt nuke reactors take off and you'll likely see those rare earth refinerys rebranded to being thorium producers with a sideline in rare earths.
"As for nuclear power plants, if they are so safe why can't we all have one in our homes?"
Simple answer: Plutonium.
Nasty toxic metal, fairly radioactive, used to make weapons, part of most fission chains
It's fear of that proliferating which keeps nukes tightly locked up, otherwise basement RTGs may well be commonplace (not just for electricity. They give off a LOT of heat)
" a decently-sized war means culling the number of people jumping up and down on this planet."
HIstory has repeatedly shown that any such cull or dieback is more than made up within 2 generations. It's a stopgap method at best.
The single largest step towards cutting CO2 emissions to encourage people to have fewer children and ironically that's best achieved by lifting the poor out of poverty (Why? Because that bowl of cereal on your table has about the same CO2 cost as a 10 mile drive in a 4x4 - and the cost goes upwards from there)
"How do you stop spam? You catch the spammers, incarcerate 'em and take their loot"
Exactly - and for the criminal spammers there are usually plenty of reasons other than just the spam (illegal pharmaceuticals, wire fraud, kid porn, etc etc etc)
The single biggest problem is lack of international coordination and willpower, given that spam is a "whote collar" crime - the fact that it's tied to organised crime in a lot of cases seems to fly over most LEO's heads.
False positives _if handled correctly_ shoudln't be a major issue.
"handled correctly" means rejected at SMTP handshake - because that way the sender knows something's wrong and can make contact via another method.
Tagging stuff as spam means that virtually everything tagged as spam is simply deleted unread,
"According to the logs off of my mail servers (processing about 2-3 million messages a day), the top spam sending domains are"
If you mean sender envelopes then yes, but as as any admin SHOULD know, any fool can set anything he wants as his MAIL FROM: and From: line.
If you use a bit of logic (SPF, DKIM and friends) to eliminate forged envelopes you'll see those numbers tumble markedly.
"I work(ed) in the advertising and digital agency business and I don't see anything wrong with what they did (so long as the blog post by the bloggers do include some blurb about bieber)."
So... a spammer dpoesn't see what's wrong with spamming.
Yeah, ok. That's credible....
I have 4 of their F5404 disk arrays.
These come from the same IBM research team as Nexsan's arrays - except they're far more crappily implemented. Nexsan clearly got the A team. Unlike Nexsan, Xyratex's staff run and hide when asked "difficult" questions.
Given my experience with Xyratex (and that they make HDD test gearplus other components) it's no surprised that given they're the last player in that field, hard drive reliability is so pants.
" it's off by default."
No, it's ON by default on new accounts.
Then it'll become on by default on existing accounts
Then they'll just start toggling it back on periodically (I'm already seeing this on TT and Tmobile filters)
There's already a section of the same filtering engine which is set to "Can't be disabled" and Big Media were quick to take advantage of it.
TT, Sky and the rest get substantial kickbacks from openreach for no-shows (which they don't pass on to the customer)
They get even larger if a company agrees to be given lower priority (which is why you got bumped).
Customer-service-focussed outfits (they do exist) pay more, but you get the cusomter service - and people have proven quite willing to pay extra for a better grade of service.
BT have repeatedly told Ofcom that there is no paper-insulated cable left in their network.
Thenthey modified the meaning of "in their network" to mean "everything from the cabinet to the house demarc point doesn't count"
Ofcom swalllowed it, hook line and sinker and has been refusing to reoopen that case.
Someone with photos would make them _extremely_ uncomfortable
Then again, given the paper insulated cable doesn't exist, BT can't prosecute any pikeys who may come across such non-existant cable and make off with it.
New Zealand also had a device called the "iPhone" on sale in the 1990s, long before Apple even got into the telephony market.
That was a nasty piece of consumer tat along the same lines as the Amstrad Em@iler thingy (only buggier and was eventually the result of a forced product recall about 2001), but its existance made it difficult for Apple to trademark the name when their new devices went on the market in NZ.
"instead of having one socket, you'll now have two. one for charging via the universal connector that won't do anything else, and then another one that'll be used for the data syncing, AV output, peripherals, etc etc."
Or a socket which can handle MicroUSB + extended plugs, like Nokia used to do with their charging shoe years ago.
"Bluetooth is even nicer and cheaper to do"
Bluetooth was a bad joke for the first decade of its existance and has only really come of age foe audio work in the last 3-4 years.
Even today I find a lot of my kit seems to have trouble maintaining its connection. It's one of those annoying "It works most of the time" technologies.