The Law of Effect in Psychology

Cat in box
Chris Winsor / Moment / Getty Images
Table of Contents
View All
Table of Contents

The law of effect is a principle in psychology stating that behaviors with satisfying outcomes are more likely to happen again, while those with unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to reoccur.

According to the law of effect, responses closely followed by satisfaction will become firmly attached to the situation and, therefore, more likely to reoccur when the situation is repeated.

Conversely, if the situation is followed by discomfort, the connections to the situation will become weaker, and the behavior of response is less likely to occur when the situation is repeated.

At a Glance

The law of effect helps explain why we repeat some behaviors and not others. When something good happens after behavior, we're more likely to engage in that behavior again. Like if your child cleans up their room and you tell them "Good job!," that praise makes it more likely your child will clean their room again in the future.

The law of effect played an important role in the development of behaviorism, a school of thought suggesting that behavior can be understood in terms of conditioning and reinforcement. In particular, the law of effect had a significant impact on B. F. Skinner's theory of operant conditioning, in which behaviors are modified using reinforcement and punishment.

Examples of the Law of Effect

Imagine that you arrive early to work one day by accident. Your boss notices and praises your diligence. The praise makes you feel good, so it reinforces the behavior.

You start showing up for work a little bit early each day to keep receiving your boss’s commendations. Because a pleasing consequence followed the behavior, the action became more likely to be repeated in the future.

More Examples

  • If you study and then get a good grade on a test, you will be more likely to study for the next exam.
  • If you work hard and then receive a promotion and pay raise, you will be more likely to continue to put in more effort at work.
  • If you run a red light and then get a traffic ticket, you will be less likely to disobey traffic lights in the future.

Who Discovered the Law of Effect?

While we often associate the idea that consequences lead to changes in behavior with the process of operant conditioning and B. F. Skinner, this notion has its roots in the early work of psychologist Edward Thorndike.

In his experiments, Thorndike utilized what is known as puzzle boxes to study how animals learn.

The boxes were enclosed but contained a small lever that, when pressed, would allow the animal to escape. Thorndike would place a cat inside the puzzle box and then place a piece of meat outside the box.

He would then observe the animal’s efforts to escape and obtain the food. He recorded how long each animal took to figure out how to free itself from the box.

Eventually, the cats would press the lever, and the door would open so that the animal could receive the reward. Even though first pressing the lever occurred simply by accident, the cats became likely to repeat it because they had received an award immediately after performing the action.

Thorndike noted that with each trial, the cats became much faster at opening the door. Because pressing the lever had led to a favorable outcome, the cats were much more likely to perform the behavior again in the future.

Thorndike termed this the “Law of Effect,” which suggested that when satisfaction follows an association, it is more likely to be repeated. If an unfavorable outcome follows an action, then it becomes less likely to be repeated.

Key Elements of the Law of Effect

There are two key aspects of the law of effect:

  • Behaviors immediately followed by favorable consequences are more likely to occur again. In our earlier example, being praised by a supervisor for showing up early for work made it more likely that the behavior would be repeated.
  • Behaviors followed by unfavorable consequences are less likely to occur again. If you show up late for work and miss an important meeting, you will probably be less likely to show up late again in the future. Because you view the missed meeting as a negative outcome, the behavior is less likely to be repeated.

The Law of Effect and Behaviorism

Thorndike’s discovery had a major influence on the development of behaviorism. In fact, B.F. Skinner based his theory of operant conditioning on the law of effect. Skinner even developed his own version of a puzzle box which he referred to as an operant conditioning chamber (also known as a Skinner box).

Operant Conditioning

In operant conditioning, behaviors that are reinforced are strengthened. Behaviors that are punished, however, are weakened. Skinner also suggested that how these reinforcements are delivered, known as the schedule of reinforcement, can affect the strength and rate of the response.

The law of effect clearly had a significant influence on the development of behaviorism, which went on to become the dominant school of thought in psychology for much of the first half of the 20th century.​

Law of Effect Today

Thorndike's research on the laws of learning played an important role in the development of behavioral psychology and continues to exert influence to this day.

Many behavioral principles remain in use today. In therapeutic settings, psychologists and other mental health professionals often use reinforcement to encourage positive behaviors and discourage undesirable ones. In such cases, the use of favorable outcomes may be used to increase the likelihood of future positive behaviors.

What This Means For You

Knowing how the law of effect works can be a valuable tool when it comes to understanding your own behavior, as well as that of the people around you. For example, when you want to increase a behavior (such as when trying to build a good habit), focus on maximizing the positive things that happen after you engage in that behavior.

By building a connection between what you do and the good (or bad) things that follow, you can either increase desirable behaviors or decrease undesirable ones.

7 Sources
Verywell Mind uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy.
  1. Athalye VR, Santos FJ, Carmena JM, Costa RM. Evidence for a neural law of effectScience. 2018;359(6379):1024-1029. doi:10.1126/science.aao6058

  2. Thorndike E. Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animalsThe Psychological Review: Monograph Supplements. 1898;2(4):i-109. doi:10.1037/h0092987

  3. Huang J, Ruan X, Yu N, Fan Q, Li J, Cai J. A cognitive model based on neuromodulated plasticity. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2016;2016:4296356. doi:10.1155%2F2016%2F4296356

  4. Nevin J. Analyzing Thorndike's law Of effect: The question of stimulus-response bondsJ Exp Anal Behav. 1999;72(3):447-450. doi:10.1901/jeab.1999.72-447

  5. Beeler JA. Thorndike's law 2.0: Dopamine and the regulation of thriftFront Neurosci. 2012;6:116. doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00116

  6. B.F. Skinner Foundation. Biographical information.

  7. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Behaviorism.

Kendra Cherry

By Kendra Cherry, MSEd
Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."