');
The Unz Review •�An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
Show by ⇅
Entire ArchiveSupreme Court Items

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library •�B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
penfieldsupreme-1
A closer look at eight pivotal SCOTUS decisions and the havoc those rulings inflicted on America. Will the next President make things better or worse? With the election deadline looming, millions of Americans already have or soon will cast a ballot to give their consent on which major party candidate will be our next president.... Read More
An Infamous Ruling By Paul Craig Roberts May 12, 2004 Twenty years and three months ago I wrote an article on the 50th anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education. This was the US Supreme Court decision that racially integrated public schools in America. Liberal elites saw the decision as a hallmark ruling for racial... Read More
We can all probably agree that this has been one of the strangest Julys in memory. From the attempt on Trump’s Life to the Republican National Convention to the bizarre “coup” against Biden in the Democratic Party. With all this, it’s easy to forget some truly momentous events that happened this month. For example, the... Read More
In a highly controversial decision, the Supreme Court on June 28 reversed a 40-year old ruling, reclaiming the Court’s role as interpreter of statutory law as it applies to a massive body of regulations imposed by federal agencies in such areas as the environment, workplace safety, public health and more. The Court’s 6-3 conservative majority... Read More
Prior to the 1930s “New Deal” regulatory agencies, Congress controlled the law. A statute mean what Congress said. Thereafter, a statute meant whatever the regulatory agency said it meant. For example, I have explained in my columns many times and in my book, The New Color Line, that the EEOC used the 1964 Civil Rights... Read More
The US Supreme Court has ruled that a president has immunity for official acts, but not for personal acts. Which is which will be a contentious issue. For example, if a president were to have the CIA, FBI, or Secret Service murder a political rival that would be a personal act. But when President Obama... Read More
The Supreme Court has ruled that law provides no basis for the obstruction charge brought against a January 6 protester who defended in court against the Justice (sic) Department’s false charges. But of course merrick garland had no interest in any facts. “Vengence is mine,” saith lord garland. “No it is not,” saith the U.S.... Read More
One third of the current US Supreme Court has been appointed by Donald Trump. This statistic is continually cited with celebration by conservatives and horror among liberals. A primary reason for this is because Trump’s Supreme Court nominations represent the only part of his legacy which remains effectively untouchable. While executive orders can be overturned,... Read More
Matt Gaetz is talking like he’s ready for a revolution. If the Supreme Court is going to throw out the First Amendment and say that the government has a right to tell private companies what they are allowed to publish, how are you going to do mental gymnastics to the point where you can claim... Read More
See: The US Government is a Criminal Gang with No Legitimate Authority to Rule the American People Shall not be infringed. Unless…. [list of hundreds of different ways it’s infringed] Imagine that there are adult human beings living on the planet earth who think the the US Constitution has some bearing on the way the... Read More
The Supreme Court ruled against corrupt New York state officials who used bribes and implied threats to stop NY financial organizations from doing business with the National Rifle Association, just as corrupt federal officials coerced and bribed social media to shut down all challenges to official narratives. The US Supreme Court’s decision, a 9-0 decision,... Read More
Those who think the tide is about to turn on censorship may have to learn a hard lesson. “The Supreme Court can dismantle the censorship-industrial complex” read an editorial in The Hill this week. Author Harmeet Dhillon warned of a “disturbing and increasingly systematic trend of government actors forcing social media companies to censor constitutionally... Read More
Previously: Supreme Court Extends Block on Texas Law Enabling Cops to Arrest Invaders So much for the “conservative” Supreme court – Oh, wait. They’re allowing the arrests now? Okay. But they’re not actually going to deport people. They arrest them and then ask them to please self-deport. Reuters: Haitian cannibals are sowing chaos and confusion... Read More
The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Colorado was devoid of authority to use the US Constitution’s 14th Amendment “insurrectionist ban” to keep Trump off the primary ballot. This power is reserved to the US Congress. This ruling is well and good. But it seems that everyone has overlooked the basic fact that Trump has... Read More
Will there be free speech or unchecked censorship?
This video is available on Rumble, BitChute, and Odysee. On Monday, the US Supreme Court heard arguments in a case that could determine whether there is free speech on the internet or unlimited censorship. Is YouTube, for example, like a newspaper, which has complete control over what it decides to print, or is it like... Read More
In theory, the Supreme Court ruled against affirmative action in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard. In practice, it was, like Steven Farron predicted on this website, a “catastrophe.” In essence, the Supreme Court told employers, colleges, and other institutions that want to racially discriminate against whites and Asians that they simply need to disguise... Read More
The Constitution (always a capital C) is the supreme law of the land. Soldiers and statesmen take their oaths to it; some Americans even used to carry copies of it around in their pockets. The Constitution is the oldest written framework of government in the world still in operation — if it were still in... Read More
The clash between the Biden Administration and Texas spilled out into the open last week, when the US Supreme Court ruled that Federal authorities could remove razor wire that Texas Governor Greg Abbott had been installing along the border with Mexico to stop the millions of illegal immigrants from crossing over to the United States.... Read More
The Supreme Court has decided in favor of the Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) and has ruled that academic racial discrimination is unconstitutional. In my book The Affirmative Action Hoax, I warned that such a decision would be catastrophic, since universities will respond by eliminating all objective criteria for admission. Now Edward Blum, who has... Read More
Jesse Merriam is a young associate professor of government at Patrick Henry College in Virginia. This monograph was published last month as part of a series by the Claremont Institute. While other critics have pointed to an overly broad interpretation of the 14th Amendment’s “equal protection” clause as the primary fig leaf under which antiracist... Read More
After nearly six decades of racial discrimination against white American males in university admissions, the Supreme Court belatedly struck down the admission of blacks to universities on the basis of race. The American public, still majority white but declining, supports the Supreme Court’s defense of the 14th Amendment that requires equal treatment. The law schools,... Read More
While Americans were enjoying hot dogs and fireworks this Fourth of July, federal Judge Terry A. Doughty commemorated Independence Day by striking a blow for the separation of big tech and state. Specifically, he issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting a number of government officials and agencies from communicating with social media companies to request they... Read More
bellcurvecover
Just over three years ago, a black lifelong criminal named George Floyd died of an apparent drug-overdose in Minneapolis police custody. This might seem a very minor incident of little importance. But by emphasizing certain distorted facts and hiding others, our media transformed that event into a symbolic flashpoint and thereby ignited a political and... Read More
See also: JOHN DERBYSHIRE: “So’s Your Old Man!”—Americans Should Adopt East Asian Response To Mass Guilt Accusations On July 4, Ben & Jerry’s ice cream company declared that Mount Rushmore was on “stolen land,” urged the country to return it to the Indians, and denounced our Founding Fathers as “colonizers.” Of course, Ben & Jerry’s... Read More
Destroys justification for college affirmative action. Thumbnail credit: © Ziyu Julian Zhu/Xinhua via ZUMA Press This video is available on Rumble, BitChute, and Odysee. The Supreme Court’s decision on affirmative action and the reactions to it are the latest proof — as if any were needed — that politics in multiracial America are fractured beyond... Read More
Its role always has been anti-democratic
Vested interests create “checks and balances” primarily to make political systems non-responsive to demands for social reform. Historically, therefore, the checks are politically unbalanced in practice. Instead of producing a happy medium, their effect often has been to check the power of the people to assert their interests at the expense of the more powerful.... Read More
unitedstatessupremecourtpillarsofjusticeandlaw
The top American news story at the end of last week was the Supreme Court's 6-3 decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, striking down the use of race in college admissions and thereby overturning nearly a half-century of its own past rulings. The print editions of our leading... Read More
This case was done on the stupid internet version of the cake baking controversy. I wish the case was about a cake, instead of website design. Faggots have been destroying Christians’ lives out of pure malice and hatred with this forced cake-baking demand, and I think the Supreme Court should have done a cake case.... Read More
vdare-derb-harvard-admissions-merit
[Adapted from the latest Radio Derb, now available exclusively on VDARE.com] A few days ago, I had the delightful and instructive experience of sitting down to dinner with Charles Murray, whose latest book, Facing Reality came out just two years ago. The "reality" in the title is reality about race differences, most particularly differences in... Read More
asianenrollmenttrends-4
By most accounts, the 6-3 Supreme Court decision striking down the Affirmative Action policies of Harvard University and other American colleges seems considerably stronger and more expansive than many had expected. Although it is difficult to predict exactly how this legal precedent will play out, the victory of these Asian plaintiffs may mark a major... Read More
There is much weeping and gnashing of teeth because the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 against “affirmative action.” Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Kentanji Brown Jackson dissented. The objection by the latter two justices is not surprising. It’s hard to believe they would be Supreme Court justices, judges, or perhaps even lawyers were it not... Read More
harvardholocaust-3
Later this week the U.S. Supreme Court will release its verdict on the landmark case Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College, widely expected to severely curtail or possibly even ban the use of race in college admissions, perhaps one of the most momentous court rulings of recent decades. After a half-century of continual growth... Read More
img_0172_1_
[Adapted from the latest Radio Derb, now available exclusively on VDARE.com] Sometime very soon—perhaps as you are hearing or reading this—the U.S. Supreme Court will, in the last month of its judicial term, bring forth a ruling on the constitutionality of Affirmative Action in college admissions. This ruling will be the final act in the... Read More
“Conservatives” ruled that race matters. Thumbnail credit: © Fred Schilling/Collection Of/Planet Pix via ZUMA Press Wire This video is available on Rumble, BitChute, and Odysee. Last week the US Supreme Court ruled on yet another case about race. The sheer volume of race cases – and the incredible number of justice-hours spent on them –... Read More
The Supreme Court is currently authoring its opinion on Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, an enormously consequential decision that could radically change how we use the internet. The decision, which could be released any time from now to July due to the complex and politically fraught nature of the case, has pit... Read More
A blogger associated with the antifa bragged at the beginning of this week that arrests were imminent against demonstrators who had participated in the August 11, 2017 tiki torch march in Charlottesville, Virginia. Three people have been arrested so far, but this may be only the beginning. The law which is being abused is Virginia... Read More
judgegavelandsoundboardonlawbookoverthewooden
STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE No. 20-1199. Argued Oct. 31, 2022. Decided Dec. 2, 2022. & STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA et al. No. 21-707. Argued Oct. 31, 2022. Decided Dec. 2, 2022. Justice KUMAR delivered the opinion of the Court. In two... Read More
supremecourt-1
The United State Supreme Court is now considering two cases that could result in a ruling that it is unconstitutional for universities to consider race or ethnicity in admissions decisions. Such a ruling would be catastrophic. Every university will react by diminishing or completely abandoning objective academic criteria for university admission. This process is already... Read More
Supreme Court. Photo by Mr. Kjetil Ree., CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Common
Thanks to the Supreme Court, the policy of racial preferences (affirmative action) is back in the news. Preferences have been around for a half century, so the pro and con arguments are well established. On the pro side, preferences are justified by the alleged advantages of “diversity,” while opponents say they are illegal, unfair, and... Read More
Earlier, by Peter Brimelow (Forbes, 1993): When Quotas Replace Merit, Everybody Suffers [Adapted from the latest Radio Derb, now available exclusively on VDARE.com] Monday this week the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two cases concerning Affirmative Action in college admissions. The plaintiff in the case is a nonprofit called Students For Fair Admissions,... Read More
unitedstatessupremecourtbuildingislocatedinwashingtond-c
The Supreme Court Reconsiders Affirmative Action
On Monday morning, the U.S. Supreme Court will begin hearing oral arguments on a potentially momentous case challenging the use of race in admissions decisions at Harvard University and our other academic institutions. Over the last half-century, our system of Affirmative Action---preferences based upon race---has become an increasingly powerful and entrenched aspect of American society,... Read More
See also Masters Attacks Affirmative Action—Makes The Move That Could Win College-Educated Whites Back To GOP An Affirmative Action case before the U.S. Supreme Court has returned this issue—so critical to white success in higher education—to the political discussion. Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, which incorporated the same... Read More
And other lefty hysterics.
This video is available on Rumble, BitChute, and Odysee. The current Supreme Court has sent the Left into apoplexy with rulings that do nothing but pay attention to what’s in the Constitution. And, as usual, whatever the Left doesn’t like is “white supremacy.” If anything, the screaming about it is even more stupid and hysterical... Read More
The Supreme Court just sent us a wake-up call. Pro-reality Americans, i.e., the 40% of voters to the left of the Democratic Party, should be grateful. A freedom essential to half the population never should have hinged upon a flimsy and poorly reasoned legal opinion. Congress should have followed the example of other countries where... Read More
hos
That the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) finally delivered a decision returning and restoring power to the states on this one issue, abortion, is as it should be. If her state outlaws abortion; a woman can still board a Greyhound bus to get the procedure elsewhere. The ethical elegance of the libertarian argument... Read More
The Supreme Court undid one of its worst mistakes last week when it overturned Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision declaring a constitutional right to abortion. The Constitution reserves to the states the authority to write and enforce laws regarding murder. Since the question of whether or not to legalize abortion revolves around whether abortion... Read More
I have always sympathized with the majority of the American population who were made complicit in the murder of the unborn by a Court decision that had no basis in morality or law. The ACLU, once a protector of the Constitution, is now a protector of sexual perverts and mass murder. I resigned my membership... Read More
vdare-radio-derb-supreme-court
Earlier: Peter Brimelow On Judicial Imperialism In FORBES...THIRTY [FIVE] YEARS AGO! While I was putting together my notes for today's podcast, the news came out that, as leaked a few days ago, the U.S. Supreme Court has indeed reversed the 1973 abortion decision Roe v. Wade. You can read it below, with tendentious annotations from... Read More
It is done. Hoes mad. The maddest ever. AP: Then why don’t you pass a bill in Congress? Because you’re lying. Alito, i
In the storm that erupted over the leaked draft opinion of Justice Samuel Alito, which would overturn Roe v. Wade, a secondary alarm has arisen among our elites. If Roe is overturned, it is said, a whole raft of Supreme Court rulings rooted in the same principles and legal reasoning could be overturned as well.... Read More
PastClassics
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
The Hidden History of the 1930s and 1940s
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?