Putin’s strongman in Chechnya, colorful Ramzan Kadyrov has been a leading iSteve content generator for over a decade. So let’s check in on how his 2024 is going:
From DJ:
Chechnya reportedly bans all music outside of 80 – 116 BPM
APRIL CLARE WELSH
8 APRIL 2024, 11:33
This new restriction will forbid vast amounts of pop music as well as dance genres such as techno, which typically exceed the 120 BPM mark.Chechnya has reportedly banned all music outside of the 80 – 116 BPM range, effectively forbidding techno and other dance music genres from the Russian republic.
As Sky News reports, the region’s culture ministry released a statement last week demanding that “all musical, vocal and choreographic works should correspond to a tempo of 80 to 116 beats per minute”.
According to the Moscow Times, the leader of the Chechen leader, Ramzan Kadyrov, has ordered that all music in the republic must “conform to the Chechen mentality” and neither be too fast or too slow. Chechen Culture Minister Musa Dadayev Dadayev reportedly said that “borrowing musical culture from other peoples is inadmissible”.
The ban in the region was reportedly announced following a meeting between the republic’s ministry and local and regional artists. This new restrictions will forbid vast amounts of pop music as well as dance genres such as techno, which typically exceed the 120 BPM mark.
Artists reportedly have until 1st June to “rewrite” any music that doesn’t fulfil the new tempo range otherwise it won’t be allowed for public performance.
But I haven’t seen any updates on this.
They (sort of) tried this in the UK in 1994. Some say it killed the rave scene in that country.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_Justice_and_Public_Order_Act_1994
Allegedly, this inspired the techno group Autechre to record the track ‘Flutter’, “in which no two bars have the same beat.”
My honest guess about this new law? Chechnya has no intent of enforcing this seriously. But I suppose doing so would be theoretically possible. Muslims gonna Muslim.
This sounds like an article from The Onion.
How do they enforce this? Give cops a metronome? Anyone who is IT savvy know if it’s possible for AI to detect the BPM of downloaded music?
“This new restriction will forbid vast amounts of pop music as well as dance genres such as techno, ”
Good: kill globohomo culture!
Meanwhile, in Mongolia…
In music, it’s often somewhat subjective what subdivision is considered to be the beat. Potentially, sufficiently fast music could wrap around and become legal again. “Sir, I understand you think I’m listening to 170 BPM drum and bass track, but I was actually feeling the half notes at 85 BPM, so really I’ve done nothing wrong.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCEL0G7sCd4
RUSH made the case 42 years ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYYdQB0mkEU
He was still in decent shape in 2019.
Speaking of the Religion of Peace, I imagine Paris is hunkered down over that blasphemous portrayal of Muhammad’s Revelations in Thomas Jolly’s opening ceremonies.
I’m kidding of course. Thomas Jolly may be a decadent Jewish homosexual but he’s no fool. No need to have a Charlie Hebdo-sized target on his back. Christians can always be counted on to bend over and take one for the team.
But I'm with Kadyrov here. Just kick shit like techno out and let your kids dance to something decent that builds a little romance. Though I'm guessing that's not really the point here.
Separate genres!Replies: @Bill Jones
But why the heck do you hire--let--a Jewish fag have anything to do with it? That's a double barreled load of pompous, obnoxious, unpleasant, anti-Christian, anti-normie hate. Who is so weak and empty that they think a human turd like this is a good pick?Replies: @Fluesterwitz, @Anonymous
Not being an anti-Semite, I am just noticing the pattern.Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
What's the evidence that he's Jewish? Foucault wasn't Jewish. Mapplethorpe wasn't Jewish.
Jew-baiters gonna Jew-bait.Replies: @ydydy, @Mike Tre, @Linus
Also bans just about every slow movement of every Classical work ever written.
And is unenforcable.
So we have a typical Government edict: What it attempts to address is trivial, its unentended consequences are significant, and it can’t be meaningfully enforced because of easy technological means around it.
A person can learn from mistakes; Humanity is incapable of doing so, no matter how egregious the mistakes are. I had a friend the other day ask me why there are still Communists in the world, and I couldn’t come up with any better answer than “people are fucktards”.
What prevents Chechen youth from running their tunes through a free online digital audio editing program and speeding up or slowing down nominally conforming music?
Conversely, why can’t the state require iTunes to digitally alter the tempo of any downloaded music, rounding the tempo up or down if it falls outside the legal range?
Canst thou credit that the barons of Moscovy do willfully enter pools of water, whence sickness and vapours and evil spirits do proceed, and claim to be in good bloom? Tis most boot that we Atlanticists have the correct idea, and “bathe” not.
———–
OT — But anon, how can you communicate complex political ideas as fast as possible? [Look it up. Recent-like. So he screwed up as a babysitter, so what.]
———–
paranoia paranoia PARANOIA plus Forever Knight plus the Masquerade plus Terminator plus IHNMAIMS (AM) plus everything = “Vampire Versus Cyborg.” Please pay $X for this genius idea.
————
Jerry Miller, influential Moby Grape guitarist who Eric Clapton called the “best guitar player in the world”, has died aged 81He was born in 1943 and given the middle name Adolph. No news there. At the time it was almost the law that the first son was to be named Junior.
Russians must be complete morons for wanting to keep control of such a violent low-IQ s***hole.
True, Islam can get weird, but Putin runs a tight ship and Kadyrov is his man. Islam is allowed to have certain restrictions: they live in their own enclave, after all.
What they can’t do is anything that threatens Kadyrov or Putin.
It's been over a century since the US has had a hostile neighbor on its border, and a century and half since the US had a hostile neighbor of any strength, so Americans today have amnesia about what to do in such a situation. The choices are: exterminate, control, or absorb. In the 1860s the US chose all three of those, which dubious decision is still lauded as an admirable part of US history. Today, after doing a certain amount of the first, Russia is now more humanely choosing the second and third.Replies: @Nico, @Torna atrás
At this very moment a largeish undeclared Great Game is going on between the US and Russia, with the US trying to seduce as many of the post-Soviet countries and former Soviet allies as possible. Armenia is almost gone to the US, Georgian leaders seem to have decided Ukraine II is not for them, Moldova is currently disputed.
All kinds of dodgy dealings in Dagestan and similar places. Those Special Forces Hercules aren't flying to Tblisi and Almaty for the food.
Yesterday a lot of Wagner troops were ambushed and killed in Northern Mali by "Tuareg rebels".
If Russia left the Chechens alone there'd soon be "advisors" along to "help" them. Better Chechnya inside the tent urinating out than outside the tent urinating in.Replies: @John Johnson, @AnotherDad, @RadicalCenter
At least Chechens are loyal to Russia. And they don’t sell fentanyl or live on welfare like the herds stampeding into the US from violent low-IQ shitholes.
The Chechens are loyal only to their fellow Chechens. Right now their leader has a deal with the Russian boss so they nominally on "team Russia". But that is just tactical and if not advantageous in the future, it would change on a dime. They have zero loyalty to Russia, but are loyal to their own people--as it should be. For that I give them fair credit.
And, of course, I in no way shape or form want any of them around me.Replies: @RadicalCenter
I can think of a reason: “Better to have your enemies inside the tent pissing out, than outside the tent pissing in”. Thanks to LBJ.
It’s all about territory—that’s an ancient reason.
True, Islam can get weird, but Putin runs a tight ship and Kadyrov is his man. Islam is allowed to have certain restrictions: they live in their own enclave, after all.
What they can’t do is anything that threatens Kadyrov or Putin.
My concept of Chechens derives from the 2014 movie “The Drop.” This superb film stars Tom Hardy, Noomi Rapace, and James Gandolfini in his last film. Hardy and Gandolfini are very formidable, as they must manage to successfully navigate the entanglement of their bar with the mafia. Well, the producers needed to cast a group of villains who were even more formidable than the above…not easy. Americanized Chechens – – super-scary bad guys – – to the rescue. Rentable at Amazon Prime.
More content-free filler from Steve.
Chechens are islamic and Islam can be skeptical of music depending on sect.
This is a fairly middle of the road position within Islam. Wahabbism, for instance, takes a harder line.
Nothing to see here. Poor iSteve. Taking cheap shots for laughs at the other because their cultural context differs from his, like some rube from the sticks.
You could have been a contender Steve but you threw it away for snark.
More content free filler from Steve.
Chechens are islamic and Islam can be skeptical of music depending on sect.
This is a fairly middle of the road position within Islam. Wahabbism, for instance, takes a harder line.
Nothing to see here. Poor iSteve. Taking cheap shots for laughs at the other because their cultural context differs from his, like some rube from the sticks.
And which genres fail to reach 80 BPM? Tuvan throat singing? ASMR lullabies? Whale calls? And why is this objectionable?
Didn’t Bowie predict this?
Ch-Ch-Ch-Ch-Chechens– Turn the tempo down
Ch-Ch-Chechens– Tell them so slow up or get out of it
What?
Russia doesn’t have America’s formidable media-political consent-manufacturing machine available to it to run cover while they remove kebab, so they more or less have to accept their Chechen neighbors and deal with them one way or another. Formerly that way was war. Now that way is Ramzan. The latter is preferable by any ethical standard: Christian, realpolitik, utilitarian, Straussian, Rawlsian, Machiavellian. That Chechnya sits athwart transit paths from the Baku oil fields only sharpens the question.
It’s been over a century since the US has had a hostile neighbor on its border, and a century and half since the US had a hostile neighbor of any strength, so Americans today have amnesia about what to do in such a situation. The choices are: exterminate, control, or absorb. In the 1860s the US chose all three of those, which dubious decision is still lauded as an admirable part of US history. Today, after doing a certain amount of the first, Russia is now more humanely choosing the second and third.
But at some point, when you’ve got a component as quirky as Islam, the “control” option will disappear, especially when the client-state is allowed to run amok on its own fanatical (Islamic) millenarian terms (as Kadyrov is allowed to do with Chechnya). The question then becomes whether absorption (Russification) is possible, but my guess is not, given that the appeasing blood pumped into the tumor only inflates it as time goes by.
If not, the question hinges on whether national morale, infrastructure and demographics are strong enough to resist succumbing, even if it means… well, you get the idea. Though not immediately obvious, this is a longer-term strategic consideration on which Putin’s campaign in Ukraine may turn out to be a serious tactical error (in terms of cost/return on morale, infrastructure and demographics).
Who could object to this??
I’m a big fan of Chechens and Dagestanis, and not just because I follow MMA and wrestling. They’re the Platonic Form of badass.
And I hope Lt. Gen. Kadyrov remains Chechnya’s leader for another 50 years. إِنْ شَاءَ ٱللَّٰهُ.
Didn't Bowie predict this?
Ch-Ch-Ch-Ch-Chechens-- Turn the tempo down
Ch-Ch-Chechens-- Tell them so slow up or get out of it What?
https://myquest.blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/steve-sack-minneapolis-star-tribune.jpg?w=1280Replies: @Anonymous
A “news” paper based in Amsterdam and started by a leftist Dutchman who doesn’t speak Russian.
How do they enforce this? Give cops a metronome? Anyone who is IT savvy know if it’s possible for AI to detect the BPM of downloaded music?Replies: @anon
You don’t need AI to detect the BPM of a music file. Software to do that has existed for decades. The goal of AI is to address problems you don’t already know how to solve.
Kadyrov doesn’t want Westerrnized “mind viruses” affecting the behavior and attitudes of Chechen youth. First they like the music and sexy videos of this cooler-new place, and then their minds become opened to the lyrics and subtle propaganda therein.
I seen a little documentary several years ago about how rap music was a popular subculture in a Westernizing Mongolia. I realized then that it’s being used as a cultural weapon.
https://youtu.be/YvKjFmDrItg?si=AEx41OsXgLXVgDvk
Speaking of the Religion of Peace, I imagine Paris is hunkered down over that blasphemous portrayal of Muhammad's Revelations in Thomas Jolly's opening ceremonies.
I'm kidding of course. Thomas Jolly may be a decadent Jewish homosexual but he's no fool. No need to have a Charlie Hebdo-sized target on his back. Christians can always be counted on to bend over and take one for the team.Replies: @AnotherDad, @AnotherDad, @Bardon Kaldian, @anon, @For what it's worth, @Ennui, @36 ulster
That dance exceeds 116 bph–far exceeds by the end.
But I’m with Kadyrov here. Just kick shit like techno out and let your kids dance to something decent that builds a little romance. Though I’m guessing that’s not really the point here.
Separate genres!
Not even Peine forte et dure is sufficient for these filth,
https://sonar21.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-27-888x1024.pngReplies: @Chrisnonymous
https://youtu.be/YvKjFmDrItg?si=AEx41OsXgLXVgDvk
Speaking of the Religion of Peace, I imagine Paris is hunkered down over that blasphemous portrayal of Muhammad's Revelations in Thomas Jolly's opening ceremonies.
I'm kidding of course. Thomas Jolly may be a decadent Jewish homosexual but he's no fool. No need to have a Charlie Hebdo-sized target on his back. Christians can always be counted on to bend over and take one for the team.Replies: @AnotherDad, @AnotherDad, @Bardon Kaldian, @anon, @For what it's worth, @Ennui, @36 ulster
I don’t really care about this Olympics stuff, much less the ceremonies.
But why the heck do you hire–let–a Jewish fag have anything to do with it? That’s a double barreled load of pompous, obnoxious, unpleasant, anti-Christian, anti-normie hate. Who is so weak and empty that they think a human turd like this is a good pick?
Can’t beat that for thinking outside the box!
Speaking of beats, if you’re going to cover Ramzan Kadyrov’s you’d be remiss to overlook his involvement with the Zionist entity…
https://www.timesofisrael.com/chechen-president-to-dedicate-abu-ghosh-mosque/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RiJzV04UyEReplies: @Steve Sailer
Looks like a poor quality fake.
It's been over a century since the US has had a hostile neighbor on its border, and a century and half since the US had a hostile neighbor of any strength, so Americans today have amnesia about what to do in such a situation. The choices are: exterminate, control, or absorb. In the 1860s the US chose all three of those, which dubious decision is still lauded as an admirable part of US history. Today, after doing a certain amount of the first, Russia is now more humanely choosing the second and third.Replies: @Nico, @Torna atrás
Actually, the choices are exterminate, control, absorb or succumb. Right now Russia is on the “control” phase because Russifying the Chechens is off the table.
But at some point, when you’ve got a component as quirky as Islam, the “control” option will disappear, especially when the client-state is allowed to run amok on its own fanatical (Islamic) millenarian terms (as Kadyrov is allowed to do with Chechnya). The question then becomes whether absorption (Russification) is possible, but my guess is not, given that the appeasing blood pumped into the tumor only inflates it as time goes by.
If not, the question hinges on whether national morale, infrastructure and demographics are strong enough to resist succumbing, even if it means… well, you get the idea. Though not immediately obvious, this is a longer-term strategic consideration on which Putin’s campaign in Ukraine may turn out to be a serious tactical error (in terms of cost/return on morale, infrastructure and demographics).
The Moscow Times exists to be quoted by western media. It has no Russian audience at all. Essentially a CIA/MI6 stooge. There is no shortage of Russian media critical of the state, indeed 95% of negative stories you read in your dailies have been taken without attribution from Russia media. But when you read the source is The Moscow Times it might as well be Radio Free Europe.
Great film.
Well, Russia was faced with Ramzan or an endless war…….
“Russians must be complete morons for wanting to keep control of such a violent low-IQ s***hole.”
At this very moment a largeish undeclared Great Game is going on between the US and Russia, with the US trying to seduce as many of the post-Soviet countries and former Soviet allies as possible. Armenia is almost gone to the US, Georgian leaders seem to have decided Ukraine II is not for them, Moldova is currently disputed.
All kinds of dodgy dealings in Dagestan and similar places. Those Special Forces Hercules aren’t flying to Tblisi and Almaty for the food.
Yesterday a lot of Wagner troops were ambushed and killed in Northern Mali by “Tuareg rebels”.
If Russia left the Chechens alone there’d soon be “advisors” along to “help” them. Better Chechnya inside the tent urinating out than outside the tent urinating in.
Did any of those former Soviet countries ever want to join the USSR? Answer: No. There is no conspiracy to seduce them. Most of those countries want closer ties so they can maintain their independence from the dwarf tsar or whatever Russia comes up with next.
Sometimes the asshole neighbor is just an asshole and that doesn't have anything to do with the guy up the street.
Before the revolution the Russians viewed their conquered neighbors as "Little Russians" even if they wanted nothing to do with them. They viewed parts of Poland as belonging to them even though the Kingdom of Poland existed before Russia. After the revolution it was all Soviet territory and of course there was never a vote on if these countries wanted to join the great failed experiment.
If Russia left the Chechens alone there’d soon be “advisors” along to “help” them. Better Chechnya inside the tent urinating out than outside the tent urinating in.
Russia: Chechnya wants independence so we need to invade them.
Russia: DPR/LPR wants independence so we need to back them.
Putin is just another Tsar that is full of shit and can't even keep a consistent narrative for his pathetic defenders. He decreed DPR/LPR to be independent nations and has since taken them as vanilla territory. They don't even get semi-autonomous status like Chechnya.Replies: @unintended consequence, @Ennui, @Anonymous
I'm a nationalist, so if I was Russian I would very much prefer to see Chechen "pissing" going on in the streets of Boston than in apartments, schools, theatres and subways of my country.
I'd very much not want to see Chechen butts in the air on the streets of Moscow. And most critically, more and more Chechen butts every year as Chechnya is one of the few Russian republics with solidly above replacement fertility while Russian fertility is well below and has slumped back down again with Putin's adventuring. Chechens are a very different people, and I'd want them out of my tent.
But Putin is a Russian imperialist all butt-hurt about the decline of the Russian Empire from its 1945-1989 peak--decline in status from one of two "superpowers" to just a "great power". So he sees all those Chechens and thinks "Great! More cannon fodder."Replies: @John Johnson, @YetAnotherAnon, @Cagey Beast
Speaking of beats, if you're going to cover Ramzan Kadyrov's you'd be remiss to overlook his involvement with the Zionist entity...
https://www.timesofisrael.com/chechen-president-to-dedicate-abu-ghosh-mosque/Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
Speaking of Chechen beats…
Neither Putin nor Kadyrov are running for US president. The fact that Kadyrov has banned most classical music along with demon rock-‘n’-roll means that he’s the hick you’d expect him to be. I’d also assume the musically gifted will emigrate to Russia if they haven’t already. The fact still remains that Trump or Harris will be elected president 100 days from now. Maybe RFK, Jr will make a decent showing for a 3rd party candidate but likely doesn’t have a chance. Or maybe it will be INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE WINS BY A LANDSLIDE but probably not. Do you intend to distract us from our inability to select good leadership for the next 4 to 8 years? Is enduring the failure by making light of it the best option? Should you or I lead a small group to emigrate to a more sane and stable country?
Seriously though, I’ve been thinking about why we end up with candidates many people just don’t want: Kamala’s DIE whitey leftism vs Trump’s flirting with dictatorship. Would election reform wrt funding and eligibility for the ballot fix the problem? Would getting rid of primaries yield a better crop of candidates? I get the sense big money donors are choosing the candidates for us though I could be wrong that this is the essence of the problem. Another approach might be allowing say
up to ten candidates and doing runoffs until someone wins. The next four years are going to be miserable for me whoever wins. I know I deserve better leadership because I pay at least a little attention to what goes on in our government. Is there some kind of insurance policy that will buffer citizens against bad government? This just isn’t fair.
Nader did it, with a lot less support than Kennedy has.
Like Perot and not Nader.
https://www.tmz.com/2024/07/26/rfk-jr-taking-more-votes-from-donald-trump-over-kamala-harris/Replies: @Reg Cæsar
https://youtu.be/YvKjFmDrItg?si=AEx41OsXgLXVgDvk
Speaking of the Religion of Peace, I imagine Paris is hunkered down over that blasphemous portrayal of Muhammad's Revelations in Thomas Jolly's opening ceremonies.
I'm kidding of course. Thomas Jolly may be a decadent Jewish homosexual but he's no fool. No need to have a Charlie Hebdo-sized target on his back. Christians can always be counted on to bend over and take one for the team.Replies: @AnotherDad, @AnotherDad, @Bardon Kaldian, @anon, @For what it's worth, @Ennui, @36 ulster
Gross Barbara Butch is also Jewish.
Not being an anti-Semite, I am just noticing the pattern.
Not caring about conversion, for all Brochs, Landsteiners, Feynmans, Szilards, von Neumanns, Grossmans, Ehrlichs, Wilders, Svevos, Assagiolis, Noethers, .... inevitably pop out freaks like Shulamit Firestone, Lerner Spectre, this Jolly, and a bunch of other sick bastards.Replies: @Erik L
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RiJzV04UyEReplies: @Steve Sailer
Right, what beats per minute is this?
As a masculine fire-up, I like the Chechen Sufi dance more than the Maori Haka that became popular with high school football teams about a decade ago:
https://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/highschool-prep-rally/california-team-celebrates-early-victory-impromptu-haka-210941192.html
But as a member of a well-armed company, I must confess I would enjoy decimating those jackasses. No poignancy for a noble savage foe either, just ruthless extermination of dipshits. That tat's are also a sign of degeneracy. Several volleys followed by a bayonet charge singing Men of Harlech.
https://youtu.be/YvKjFmDrItg?si=AEx41OsXgLXVgDvk
Speaking of the Religion of Peace, I imagine Paris is hunkered down over that blasphemous portrayal of Muhammad's Revelations in Thomas Jolly's opening ceremonies.
I'm kidding of course. Thomas Jolly may be a decadent Jewish homosexual but he's no fool. No need to have a Charlie Hebdo-sized target on his back. Christians can always be counted on to bend over and take one for the team.Replies: @AnotherDad, @AnotherDad, @Bardon Kaldian, @anon, @For what it's worth, @Ennui, @36 ulster
Bunch of vaxxed sissies venturing out of their closets. Who’d be scared of that bunch of pussies?
It doesn’t matter what Ramzan Kadyrov is up to lately. We know every piece of news coming out of Russia and Chechnya will be interpreted by Western “experts” as indicating the situation is no longer tenable meaning the inevitable collapse of the Putin regime coming quite soon. I’m sure Kadyrov’s specifying the beat of music was accompanied by Western interpretations that he and Putin are losing their grip on power and are now desperately lashing out.
If Ramzan performs a traditional Caucasian farting dance, the experts will totally agree that “the situation is now indicative of a total collapse in the level of trust in Putin actually keeping his power, the fear has now been lost”.
Literally, any news out of Russia for the past twenty years means an angry mob lynching Putin and then signing over Russian resources to Western corporations. Funny how an independent media and professional expertise works in real life.
Western political expertise resembles Roman auguries examining the entrails of chickens and then foretelling the future according to who paid them the most.
It is indeed funny as it shows how most people are hopelessly tribal and want a singular view that matches their ideals. The pro-Putin bloggers and clickbait whores like Ritter have been telling their faithful that Russia has won. Both Macgregor and Ritter have declared Ukraine to be near collapse since day one. Putin still hasn't taken Kharkov which is 30 miles from the Russian border. They're currently experimenting with motorcycle squads in an effort to evade the Ukrainian drones. They're also using African mercenaries. Does this sound like a war that is going as planned? The only media to trust is none of them. Unz is an interesting experiment that shows how even most of alt-right doesn't want a variety of sources. Most of the Putin defenders here just want a new CNN but with Ritter and Larry softballing each other. Most people are clearly wired for tribal brain and can't break out of it.Replies: @notbe mk 2, @unintended consequence
But I'm with Kadyrov here. Just kick shit like techno out and let your kids dance to something decent that builds a little romance. Though I'm guessing that's not really the point here.
Separate genres!Replies: @Bill Jones
Larry Johnson looked at The Last Supper abomination :
.
Not even Peine forte et dure is sufficient for these filth,
According to this site, 119, so it just gets under the barrier.
https://keybpmfinder.com/
(Agree that the Haka and steroids/HGH combination is just too threatening)
Would the “Auslander Reis” song be banned?
But why the heck do you hire--let--a Jewish fag have anything to do with it? That's a double barreled load of pompous, obnoxious, unpleasant, anti-Christian, anti-normie hate. Who is so weak and empty that they think a human turd like this is a good pick?Replies: @Fluesterwitz, @Anonymous
The leaders of France who hate the French? Or, maybe, some anti-semite who believes in showing rather than telling?
Not being an anti-Semite, I am just noticing the pattern.Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
I must correct myself here. For 30 good and great things Jews do- there always, always..appears some fucking Jewish creep to spoil everything.
Not caring about conversion, for all Brochs, Landsteiners, Feynmans, Szilards, von Neumanns, Grossmans, Ehrlichs, Wilders, Svevos, Assagiolis, Noethers, …. inevitably pop out freaks like Shulamit Firestone, Lerner Spectre, this Jolly, and a bunch of other sick bastards.
But why the heck do you hire--let--a Jewish fag have anything to do with it? That's a double barreled load of pompous, obnoxious, unpleasant, anti-Christian, anti-normie hate. Who is so weak and empty that they think a human turd like this is a good pick?Replies: @Fluesterwitz, @Anonymous
In France, demonstrative irreligousness is “normie”. Don’t be a minoritarian. 😉
You are misinformed. Derk Sauer does speak Russian. He worked in Moscow for 30 years, how could you possible imagine he could do this without speaking their language?
Quick, the cops are here, put your fingers on the record!
Yeah, speaking Russian would help if your business model intention is to publish something called the “Moscow Times” but if your intention is to publish propaganda written by the CIA and supposedly mirroring Russian public opinion that can be picked up by the Western media, not having actual knowledge of the local lingo is just a minor thing.
https://youtu.be/YvKjFmDrItg?si=AEx41OsXgLXVgDvk
Speaking of the Religion of Peace, I imagine Paris is hunkered down over that blasphemous portrayal of Muhammad's Revelations in Thomas Jolly's opening ceremonies.
I'm kidding of course. Thomas Jolly may be a decadent Jewish homosexual but he's no fool. No need to have a Charlie Hebdo-sized target on his back. Christians can always be counted on to bend over and take one for the team.Replies: @AnotherDad, @AnotherDad, @Bardon Kaldian, @anon, @For what it's worth, @Ennui, @36 ulster
“Thomas Jolly may be a decadent Jewish homosexual but he’s no fool.”
What’s the evidence that he’s Jewish? Foucault wasn’t Jewish. Mapplethorpe wasn’t Jewish.
Jew-baiters gonna Jew-bait.
correct) it seems that the Joo-obsessives so overtook some corners of the culture wars so completely that I never doubted that he was some kind of asshole who was born Jewish.
This without ever having looked into either Foucault or searched any "who is a jew" list either.
So if you're right, that's interesting, Joo-obsessives are apparently able to shape popular opinions, even mine.
Being a bit of a snob I blame the Jews.
Were I a gentile who knew few Jews but saw their names predominating various fields while being told that curiosity about the subject was verboten, I too would take to wondering what they were hiding.
Anyhow, unless he turns out to have actually been a glorious and wise man, there's no need to educate me further regarding Foucault. I appear who have gotten this far in life posessed of misinformation about the single fact I thought I knew about the fella so I figure I can live out the rest of my years without a great deal of additional elucidation.Replies: @For what it's worth
https://s.rfi.fr/media/display/2ce00ae0-13f4-11ea-b676-005056bf7c53/w:1280/p:16x9/a-coup-sf-jolly-pret_0.jpgReplies: @For what it's worth, @kaganovitch, @J.Ross
OT:
Two French lefties (Melenchon and Bertrand) showing some understanding and goodwill towards Christians insulted by the opening ceremonies:
The issue is, why didn't they take a poke at --
So I guess this traditional song is out?
At this very moment a largeish undeclared Great Game is going on between the US and Russia, with the US trying to seduce as many of the post-Soviet countries and former Soviet allies as possible. Armenia is almost gone to the US, Georgian leaders seem to have decided Ukraine II is not for them, Moldova is currently disputed.
All kinds of dodgy dealings in Dagestan and similar places. Those Special Forces Hercules aren't flying to Tblisi and Almaty for the food.
Yesterday a lot of Wagner troops were ambushed and killed in Northern Mali by "Tuareg rebels".
If Russia left the Chechens alone there'd soon be "advisors" along to "help" them. Better Chechnya inside the tent urinating out than outside the tent urinating in.Replies: @John Johnson, @AnotherDad, @RadicalCenter
At this very moment a largeish undeclared Great Game is going on between the US and Russia, with the US trying to seduce as many of the post-Soviet countries and former Soviet allies as possible.
Did any of those former Soviet countries ever want to join the USSR? Answer: No. There is no conspiracy to seduce them. Most of those countries want closer ties so they can maintain their independence from the dwarf tsar or whatever Russia comes up with next.
Sometimes the asshole neighbor is just an asshole and that doesn’t have anything to do with the guy up the street.
Before the revolution the Russians viewed their conquered neighbors as “Little Russians” even if they wanted nothing to do with them. They viewed parts of Poland as belonging to them even though the Kingdom of Poland existed before Russia. After the revolution it was all Soviet territory and of course there was never a vote on if these countries wanted to join the great failed experiment.
If Russia left the Chechens alone there’d soon be “advisors” along to “help” them. Better Chechnya inside the tent urinating out than outside the tent urinating in.
Russia: Chechnya wants independence so we need to invade them.
Russia: DPR/LPR wants independence so we need to back them.
Putin is just another Tsar that is full of shit and can’t even keep a consistent narrative for his pathetic defenders. He decreed DPR/LPR to be independent nations and has since taken them as vanilla territory. They don’t even get semi-autonomous status like Chechnya.
In the history of Poland, it has indeed appropriated parts of Russia. Poland-Lithuania was a large asshole neighbor that was eventually whittled down to a much smaller less threatening Poland that now pretends it has only a history of being conquered, never of being an aggressor state. The Russian Federation might have offered Poland back some of its former territory that is currently part of Ukraine if Poland weren't so intent on using NATO membership as a cudgel. Or is it that Poland is making itself into NATOs cudgel?Replies: @John Johnson
If Ramzan performs a traditional Caucasian farting dance, the experts will totally agree that "the situation is now indicative of a total collapse in the level of trust in Putin actually keeping his power, the fear has now been lost".
Literally, any news out of Russia for the past twenty years means an angry mob lynching Putin and then signing over Russian resources to Western corporations. Funny how an independent media and professional expertise works in real life.
Western political expertise resembles Roman auguries examining the entrails of chickens and then foretelling the future according to who paid them the most.Replies: @John Johnson
Funny how an independent media and professional expertise works in real life.
It is indeed funny as it shows how most people are hopelessly tribal and want a singular view that matches their ideals.
The pro-Putin bloggers and clickbait whores like Ritter have been telling their faithful that Russia has won. Both Macgregor and Ritter have declared Ukraine to be near collapse since day one.
Putin still hasn’t taken Kharkov which is 30 miles from the Russian border. They’re currently experimenting with motorcycle squads in an effort to evade the Ukrainian drones. They’re also using African mercenaries. Does this sound like a war that is going as planned?
The only media to trust is none of them.
Unz is an interesting experiment that shows how even most of alt-right doesn’t want a variety of sources. Most of the Putin defenders here just want a new CNN but with Ritter and Larry softballing each other. Most people are clearly wired for tribal brain and can’t break out of it.
I feel that we do want a variety sources but unfortunately there is a lot of fake news out there. For instance, if you remember as a way of helping you out, way back I nicely pointed out that you had a tendency to automatically and naively use obvious created propaganda and I kindly pointed out why exactly your sources were obviously created propaganda and not really news.
As I remember, you appreciated that and was grateful I pointed out the flaws in the propaganda that were not evident on initial perusal and we both come out of it as better persons since no-one is perfect and we all need a kindly word and a helpful hand in navigating the information superhighway.
As hard as it is for some to believe, informational-evaluation really has nothing to do with a wired tribal brain or wanting to have softball answers or a new CNN or whatever. It has to do with being a tad skeptical and using your God-given noggin to evaluate because, let's face it not trusting anything is just plain out and out absolutely retarded.
Paranoid schizophrenics don't trust anything but intelligent people evaluate so unfortunately your advice, as helpful as it is, not to trust anything in the media is just a non-starter just for mental-health reasons alone.
You see in real life, events happen, something is always being done somewhere at sometime but bad people put their own spin on it and it really is a useful skill to see what is being spinned and who is spinning and why it is being spunned. I'm sure you agree like last time we chatted.
To help everyone to be better at information-evaluation, care to share with everybody why I felt your sources were created propaganda?
To help you out, as you remember there were four specific times I disagreed with your sources and gave specific reasons why. I know you remember since finding a person in this cruel and confusing time that actually goes out of his way to help out another person evaluate information by giving specific reasons is very unique but hey that's the way I am, no need to thank me.
Now we two have a tendency to go back and forth because we enjoy chatting with each other-how's your summer going? Yesterday, I went to the zoo, saw Chacoan peccaries, if you have time I'll tell what is really interesting about those.
Anyways, this time to spare everyone confusion and time just stick to answering my question and please list the four instances and why I felt that they obviously were created propaganda and not info.
On the contrary, you and Jack D don't want a variety of sources. I've had to do lots of reading to gain a better perspective on the Russian Federation in general. I can't tell if journalists don't know any of the history of Russia or if they deliberately spout propaganda. The news about Russia is with one voice: NATOs. Journalists aren't doing their job anymore. This is most obvious with coverage of Russia but certainly not limited to that topic. I've had a whole education about Russia and foreign policy since this started and could expand it a bit more. I actually avoid the outright pro-Russian propagandists like Ritter. He is brilliant but isn't informing when he writes about Russia. Most others simply have a foreign policy preference that views Russia in friendly terms if not as an outright ally. People like MacGregor and Mearsheimer view NATO as having expanded into Russia's backyard eliciting a response not unlike ours during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
It is you who refuses to be anything like fair or objective. I, like most who sympathize with Russia, start from the premise that Russia is a friendly country. It is realistic that Russia like Israel or any number of cordial countries will occasionally do things we don't like. This is no reason to end the friendship or to continue Cold War era Containment. The US has a long history of relating to smaller countries by making offers they can't refuse. It is the way things are done no matter how much this gets glossed over with propaganda. The Ukrainian people have not benefited in any way by having NATOs red line drawn in their country. Russia wasn't trying to incorporate Ukraine; the terms for coexisting were clearly laid out in the Minsk agreements. Zelensky and his friends have gotten fantastically rich at the expense of Ukraine and its people. Those postponed elections would have been the end of Zelensky's political career as well as his cash flow. Russia is acting logically to defend itself against NATO encroachment. Putin spent years trying to build a good relationship with NATO and was rewarded with renewed attempts at containment. NATO has no intention of peaceful coexistence; it intends to break up the Russian Federation no doubt to be followed with offers smaller entities like Chechnya can't refuse. Your obfuscation only hides the truth from people who aren't the least bit concerned with learning anything for themselves.
You are obviously military. What I want you to understand is that the US as hegemon is of not benefit to the average American. Putin isn't trying to takeover Eastern Europe. He likely doesn't even have the necessary manpower for such an endeavor. Likewise, China dominating Asia reduced our influence there but doesn't damage the US. We are supposed to be a country with a military mainly used to defend our homeland not a military with a country. If I ever get the word out that all this hullabaloo is about a US empire rather than a free world, things will change rather
quickly. The citizens of this country are being forced to embrace NATO political values that, among other things, exert tight secular control over religion; they're also being marginalized on behalf of a potentially endless supply of immigrants; these immigrants are treated like the victims of those they are displacing and replacing so are given preferential treatment in all matters. The US and NATO currently need to strengthen its relationship with India so the UK and Ireland have had Indian prime ministers while the US has VP Kamala Harris now running for president; that Ramaswampy and Haley were both in the Republican primary debates while no Hispanic candidates we're there to represent an emerging majority ethnicity is very telling.
You keep insisting that those of us who take Russia's side in the proxy war being fought in the Ukraine are naive. The truth is we know that NATO expansion with the continuation of Cold War containment and the new effort to contain China are inextricably linked to unconstitutional policies and mass immigration that harms American citizens. We are the ones being shoved aside so the US and NATO can try to rule the world. The narrative is that evil dictators will sprout like mushrooms if we don't play world police; the truth is that foreign governments have to earn the consent of the governed in order to survive. It's just that people from other cultures tend to value economic efficacy over free speech and are generally more conformist than Westerners. Their governments will be more authoritarian just like their cultures. Odd seeing France display the weakest argument imaginable for free speech with a gay Jew setting up an irreverent reenactment of the Last Supper. No one outside the Western world will be convinced that our civilization is superior by this mockery of what us sacred to Christians. Even many Westerners are losing faith in their own governments because the leadership exhibits such poor judgment. It's one thing to allow freedom of thought, quite another to condone public displays of sacrilege and debauchery. The NATO values being forced on the US are decadent European values, not American. We are a dying civilization that views religion as more of a threat than decadence. We need to liberate ourselves from leaders who are dragging us to ruin not try to police the world.Replies: @notbe mk 2, @HA, @John Johnson, @Mark G., @J.Ross
Pain of prosecution.
I’m sure it can, but spoofing software is so prevalent it would be trivial to defeat this; and they are back to spies and enforcement.
Not caring about conversion, for all Brochs, Landsteiners, Feynmans, Szilards, von Neumanns, Grossmans, Ehrlichs, Wilders, Svevos, Assagiolis, Noethers, .... inevitably pop out freaks like Shulamit Firestone, Lerner Spectre, this Jolly, and a bunch of other sick bastards.Replies: @Erik L
The same could easily be said for gentiles, yet no one considers acts of gentiles they dislike to ruin the acts of gentiles they like…well except for the people we currently call woke. They think that way, but I thought we were all against that
-----------
OT -- But anon, how can you communicate complex political ideas as fast as possible? [Look it up. Recent-like. So he screwed up as a babysitter, so what.]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7OwGS3jJ4E
-----------
paranoia paranoia PARANOIA plus Forever Knight plus the Masquerade plus Terminator plus IHNMAIMS (AM) plus everything = "Vampire Versus Cyborg." Please pay $X for this genius idea.
------------
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x34icYC8zA0Replies: @Reg Cæsar
Speaking of which…
Jerry Miller, influential Moby Grape guitarist who Eric Clapton called the “best guitar player in the world”, has died aged 81
He was born in 1943 and given the middle name Adolph. No news there. At the time it was almost the law that the first son was to be named Junior.
Or English, apparently.
Did any of those former Soviet countries ever want to join the USSR? Answer: No. There is no conspiracy to seduce them. Most of those countries want closer ties so they can maintain their independence from the dwarf tsar or whatever Russia comes up with next.
Sometimes the asshole neighbor is just an asshole and that doesn't have anything to do with the guy up the street.
Before the revolution the Russians viewed their conquered neighbors as "Little Russians" even if they wanted nothing to do with them. They viewed parts of Poland as belonging to them even though the Kingdom of Poland existed before Russia. After the revolution it was all Soviet territory and of course there was never a vote on if these countries wanted to join the great failed experiment.
If Russia left the Chechens alone there’d soon be “advisors” along to “help” them. Better Chechnya inside the tent urinating out than outside the tent urinating in.
Russia: Chechnya wants independence so we need to invade them.
Russia: DPR/LPR wants independence so we need to back them.
Putin is just another Tsar that is full of shit and can't even keep a consistent narrative for his pathetic defenders. He decreed DPR/LPR to be independent nations and has since taken them as vanilla territory. They don't even get semi-autonomous status like Chechnya.Replies: @unintended consequence, @Ennui, @Anonymous
“They viewed parts of Poland as belonging to them even though the Kingdom of Poland existed before Russia.”
In the history of Poland, it has indeed appropriated parts of Russia. Poland-Lithuania was a large asshole neighbor that was eventually whittled down to a much smaller less threatening Poland that now pretends it has only a history of being conquered, never of being an aggressor state. The Russian Federation might have offered Poland back some of its former territory that is currently part of Ukraine if Poland weren’t so intent on using NATO membership as a cudgel. Or is it that Poland is making itself into NATOs cudgel?
Seriously though, I've been thinking about why we end up with candidates many people just don't want: Kamala's DIE whitey leftism vs Trump's flirting with dictatorship. Would election reform wrt funding and eligibility for the ballot fix the problem? Would getting rid of primaries yield a better crop of candidates? I get the sense big money donors are choosing the candidates for us though I could be wrong that this is the essence of the problem. Another approach might be allowing say
up to ten candidates and doing runoffs until someone wins. The next four years are going to be miserable for me whoever wins. I know I deserve better leadership because I pay at least a little attention to what goes on in our government. Is there some kind of insurance policy that will buffer citizens against bad government? This just isn't fair.Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @epebble
His problem is he’s a Perot, not a Wallace. If he could only concentrate is support in a few states, he’d have a lot more influence. He wouldn’t even have to lead in those states, just threaten to throw them to the other guy. That would wake people up.
Nader did it, with a lot less support than Kennedy has.
Kadyrov is correct. There are simply too many notes in some of those songs.
There is nothing particularly Chechen in it. It is the same as all Sufi dances, and all religious intoxication dances around the world. For instance, exactly the same dance that sparked the Wounded Knee battle..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQli9RIkEX8
is similar, but much more beautiful. And not at all threatening, unlike a few hundred Chechens dancing in trance.Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
It is indeed funny as it shows how most people are hopelessly tribal and want a singular view that matches their ideals. The pro-Putin bloggers and clickbait whores like Ritter have been telling their faithful that Russia has won. Both Macgregor and Ritter have declared Ukraine to be near collapse since day one. Putin still hasn't taken Kharkov which is 30 miles from the Russian border. They're currently experimenting with motorcycle squads in an effort to evade the Ukrainian drones. They're also using African mercenaries. Does this sound like a war that is going as planned? The only media to trust is none of them. Unz is an interesting experiment that shows how even most of alt-right doesn't want a variety of sources. Most of the Putin defenders here just want a new CNN but with Ritter and Larry softballing each other. Most people are clearly wired for tribal brain and can't break out of it.Replies: @notbe mk 2, @unintended consequence
Oh hi John, to answer your comment this time I kind of disagree with your opinion even though as always I respect it.
I feel that we do want a variety sources but unfortunately there is a lot of fake news out there. For instance, if you remember as a way of helping you out, way back I nicely pointed out that you had a tendency to automatically and naively use obvious created propaganda and I kindly pointed out why exactly your sources were obviously created propaganda and not really news.
As I remember, you appreciated that and was grateful I pointed out the flaws in the propaganda that were not evident on initial perusal and we both come out of it as better persons since no-one is perfect and we all need a kindly word and a helpful hand in navigating the information superhighway.
As hard as it is for some to believe, informational-evaluation really has nothing to do with a wired tribal brain or wanting to have softball answers or a new CNN or whatever. It has to do with being a tad skeptical and using your God-given noggin to evaluate because, let’s face it not trusting anything is just plain out and out absolutely retarded.
Paranoid schizophrenics don’t trust anything but intelligent people evaluate so unfortunately your advice, as helpful as it is, not to trust anything in the media is just a non-starter just for mental-health reasons alone.
You see in real life, events happen, something is always being done somewhere at sometime but bad people put their own spin on it and it really is a useful skill to see what is being spinned and who is spinning and why it is being spunned. I’m sure you agree like last time we chatted.
To help everyone to be better at information-evaluation, care to share with everybody why I felt your sources were created propaganda?
To help you out, as you remember there were four specific times I disagreed with your sources and gave specific reasons why. I know you remember since finding a person in this cruel and confusing time that actually goes out of his way to help out another person evaluate information by giving specific reasons is very unique but hey that’s the way I am, no need to thank me.
Now we two have a tendency to go back and forth because we enjoy chatting with each other-how’s your summer going? Yesterday, I went to the zoo, saw Chacoan peccaries, if you have time I’ll tell what is really interesting about those.
Anyways, this time to spare everyone confusion and time just stick to answering my question and please list the four instances and why I felt that they obviously were created propaganda and not info.
Ha haha I know right can you imagine living in a third world diversity-hole where the powerful attempt to overwrite reality that would be crazy ha ha ha
It is indeed funny as it shows how most people are hopelessly tribal and want a singular view that matches their ideals. The pro-Putin bloggers and clickbait whores like Ritter have been telling their faithful that Russia has won. Both Macgregor and Ritter have declared Ukraine to be near collapse since day one. Putin still hasn't taken Kharkov which is 30 miles from the Russian border. They're currently experimenting with motorcycle squads in an effort to evade the Ukrainian drones. They're also using African mercenaries. Does this sound like a war that is going as planned? The only media to trust is none of them. Unz is an interesting experiment that shows how even most of alt-right doesn't want a variety of sources. Most of the Putin defenders here just want a new CNN but with Ritter and Larry softballing each other. Most people are clearly wired for tribal brain and can't break out of it.Replies: @notbe mk 2, @unintended consequence
“Unz is an interesting experiment that shows how even most of alt-right doesn’t want a variety of sources. Most of the Putin defenders here just want a new CNN but with Ritter and Larry softballing each other. Most people are clearly wired for tribal brain and can’t break out of it.”
On the contrary, you and Jack D don’t want a variety of sources. I’ve had to do lots of reading to gain a better perspective on the Russian Federation in general. I can’t tell if journalists don’t know any of the history of Russia or if they deliberately spout propaganda. The news about Russia is with one voice: NATOs. Journalists aren’t doing their job anymore. This is most obvious with coverage of Russia but certainly not limited to that topic. I’ve had a whole education about Russia and foreign policy since this started and could expand it a bit more. I actually avoid the outright pro-Russian propagandists like Ritter. He is brilliant but isn’t informing when he writes about Russia. Most others simply have a foreign policy preference that views Russia in friendly terms if not as an outright ally. People like MacGregor and Mearsheimer view NATO as having expanded into Russia’s backyard eliciting a response not unlike ours during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
It is you who refuses to be anything like fair or objective. I, like most who sympathize with Russia, start from the premise that Russia is a friendly country. It is realistic that Russia like Israel or any number of cordial countries will occasionally do things we don’t like. This is no reason to end the friendship or to continue Cold War era Containment. The US has a long history of relating to smaller countries by making offers they can’t refuse. It is the way things are done no matter how much this gets glossed over with propaganda. The Ukrainian people have not benefited in any way by having NATOs red line drawn in their country. Russia wasn’t trying to incorporate Ukraine; the terms for coexisting were clearly laid out in the Minsk agreements. Zelensky and his friends have gotten fantastically rich at the expense of Ukraine and its people. Those postponed elections would have been the end of Zelensky’s political career as well as his cash flow. Russia is acting logically to defend itself against NATO encroachment. Putin spent years trying to build a good relationship with NATO and was rewarded with renewed attempts at containment. NATO has no intention of peaceful coexistence; it intends to break up the Russian Federation no doubt to be followed with offers smaller entities like Chechnya can’t refuse. Your obfuscation only hides the truth from people who aren’t the least bit concerned with learning anything for themselves.
You are obviously military. What I want you to understand is that the US as hegemon is of not benefit to the average American. Putin isn’t trying to takeover Eastern Europe. He likely doesn’t even have the necessary manpower for such an endeavor. Likewise, China dominating Asia reduced our influence there but doesn’t damage the US. We are supposed to be a country with a military mainly used to defend our homeland not a military with a country. If I ever get the word out that all this hullabaloo is about a US empire rather than a free world, things will change rather
quickly. The citizens of this country are being forced to embrace NATO political values that, among other things, exert tight secular control over religion; they’re also being marginalized on behalf of a potentially endless supply of immigrants; these immigrants are treated like the victims of those they are displacing and replacing so are given preferential treatment in all matters. The US and NATO currently need to strengthen its relationship with India so the UK and Ireland have had Indian prime ministers while the US has VP Kamala Harris now running for president; that Ramaswampy and Haley were both in the Republican primary debates while no Hispanic candidates we’re there to represent an emerging majority ethnicity is very telling.
You keep insisting that those of us who take Russia’s side in the proxy war being fought in the Ukraine are naive. The truth is we know that NATO expansion with the continuation of Cold War containment and the new effort to contain China are inextricably linked to unconstitutional policies and mass immigration that harms American citizens. We are the ones being shoved aside so the US and NATO can try to rule the world. The narrative is that evil dictators will sprout like mushrooms if we don’t play world police; the truth is that foreign governments have to earn the consent of the governed in order to survive. It’s just that people from other cultures tend to value economic efficacy over free speech and are generally more conformist than Westerners. Their governments will be more authoritarian just like their cultures. Odd seeing France display the weakest argument imaginable for free speech with a gay Jew setting up an irreverent reenactment of the Last Supper. No one outside the Western world will be convinced that our civilization is superior by this mockery of what us sacred to Christians. Even many Westerners are losing faith in their own governments because the leadership exhibits such poor judgment. It’s one thing to allow freedom of thought, quite another to condone public displays of sacrilege and debauchery. The NATO values being forced on the US are decadent European values, not American. We are a dying civilization that views religion as more of a threat than decadence. We need to liberate ourselves from leaders who are dragging us to ruin not try to police the world.
Steve is throwing a beanball at Russia, because that is his job, but this calls up some entertainment:
Techno is ubiquitous in the parts of Europe I have been in. My brother-in-law plays it constantly in his BMW while driving my wife and me — very rapidly — across Hungary.
I made him and my wife laugh on our way to Budapest when I mentioned my favorite Romanian pop star, Alexandra Stan. I told him to search for my favorite Romanian pop song, “Lolipop.” I don’t know how many BPM it is, but we watched this at 190KPH:
Mongolian Idiots.
Russia has probably a dozen “ethnic” republics (Tuva, Kalmykia, Yakutia, Buryat, Dagestan, Udmurtia and so forth), with territory of several million square miles, if they give in on Chechnya, they are risking these will try to go as well. It makes sense a harsh line on Chechnya’s independence (Russia was willing to fight two bloody wars to prevent it)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0d/Flag_of_Irkutsk_%28Irkutsk_oblast%29.svg/2560px-Flag_of_Irkutsk_%28Irkutsk_oblast%29.svg.pnghttps://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Flag_of_Ryazan.svg
Can you top a defecating mammoth?
https://gdb.rferl.org/3B8F0A75-36A3-4D35-9141-B74BDE507A27_w1080_r0_s.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/4yktJFW9/1722181098130668.pngReplies: @Corpse Tooth, @Anonymous
Isn’t it exciting that we live in a time when seemingly all new technologies are put to use in the genocidal schemes of turd-like elites?
And you know this how?
Historically the violence prone Turkic Chechens have hated Russia and Russians. Russians were Christian (in theory, usually) while most Chechens are Muslims.
Russians today and particularly in law enforcement regard Chechens as criminals, smugglers and hooligans. They are the Usual Suspects in Moscow and other cities. Some truth to those acusations since Chechens are a distinct language family very clan/family oriented society.
Ideal for small sized crime organizations. Few Russians speak Chechen.
As to welfare, Chechens are very poor but Russians aren’t going to subsidize Asian hillbillys unless they are performing as informers or hired mercenaries (as in Ukraine War).
Many poor Chechens have “migrated” to other Russian places and large cities, leaving shithole Chechnya.
Putin and prior pals leveled most of urban Chechnya during that 1990s-2000 era of Chechnya’s rebellion from the Russian “federation.”
You might take a moment to learn something about Chechnya and it’s recent history, not to mention its long past history of hating on Russia.
Tolstoy’s famous novel on the subject: https://www.amazon.com/Hadji-Murad-Leo-Tolstoy/dp/1602060134
Like, duh. Hense Kadyrov.
The Chechens aren't Turkic. You could at least have perused the Wikipedia page about them before you got on your soapbox.
On the contrary, you and Jack D don't want a variety of sources. I've had to do lots of reading to gain a better perspective on the Russian Federation in general. I can't tell if journalists don't know any of the history of Russia or if they deliberately spout propaganda. The news about Russia is with one voice: NATOs. Journalists aren't doing their job anymore. This is most obvious with coverage of Russia but certainly not limited to that topic. I've had a whole education about Russia and foreign policy since this started and could expand it a bit more. I actually avoid the outright pro-Russian propagandists like Ritter. He is brilliant but isn't informing when he writes about Russia. Most others simply have a foreign policy preference that views Russia in friendly terms if not as an outright ally. People like MacGregor and Mearsheimer view NATO as having expanded into Russia's backyard eliciting a response not unlike ours during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
It is you who refuses to be anything like fair or objective. I, like most who sympathize with Russia, start from the premise that Russia is a friendly country. It is realistic that Russia like Israel or any number of cordial countries will occasionally do things we don't like. This is no reason to end the friendship or to continue Cold War era Containment. The US has a long history of relating to smaller countries by making offers they can't refuse. It is the way things are done no matter how much this gets glossed over with propaganda. The Ukrainian people have not benefited in any way by having NATOs red line drawn in their country. Russia wasn't trying to incorporate Ukraine; the terms for coexisting were clearly laid out in the Minsk agreements. Zelensky and his friends have gotten fantastically rich at the expense of Ukraine and its people. Those postponed elections would have been the end of Zelensky's political career as well as his cash flow. Russia is acting logically to defend itself against NATO encroachment. Putin spent years trying to build a good relationship with NATO and was rewarded with renewed attempts at containment. NATO has no intention of peaceful coexistence; it intends to break up the Russian Federation no doubt to be followed with offers smaller entities like Chechnya can't refuse. Your obfuscation only hides the truth from people who aren't the least bit concerned with learning anything for themselves.
You are obviously military. What I want you to understand is that the US as hegemon is of not benefit to the average American. Putin isn't trying to takeover Eastern Europe. He likely doesn't even have the necessary manpower for such an endeavor. Likewise, China dominating Asia reduced our influence there but doesn't damage the US. We are supposed to be a country with a military mainly used to defend our homeland not a military with a country. If I ever get the word out that all this hullabaloo is about a US empire rather than a free world, things will change rather
quickly. The citizens of this country are being forced to embrace NATO political values that, among other things, exert tight secular control over religion; they're also being marginalized on behalf of a potentially endless supply of immigrants; these immigrants are treated like the victims of those they are displacing and replacing so are given preferential treatment in all matters. The US and NATO currently need to strengthen its relationship with India so the UK and Ireland have had Indian prime ministers while the US has VP Kamala Harris now running for president; that Ramaswampy and Haley were both in the Republican primary debates while no Hispanic candidates we're there to represent an emerging majority ethnicity is very telling.
You keep insisting that those of us who take Russia's side in the proxy war being fought in the Ukraine are naive. The truth is we know that NATO expansion with the continuation of Cold War containment and the new effort to contain China are inextricably linked to unconstitutional policies and mass immigration that harms American citizens. We are the ones being shoved aside so the US and NATO can try to rule the world. The narrative is that evil dictators will sprout like mushrooms if we don't play world police; the truth is that foreign governments have to earn the consent of the governed in order to survive. It's just that people from other cultures tend to value economic efficacy over free speech and are generally more conformist than Westerners. Their governments will be more authoritarian just like their cultures. Odd seeing France display the weakest argument imaginable for free speech with a gay Jew setting up an irreverent reenactment of the Last Supper. No one outside the Western world will be convinced that our civilization is superior by this mockery of what us sacred to Christians. Even many Westerners are losing faith in their own governments because the leadership exhibits such poor judgment. It's one thing to allow freedom of thought, quite another to condone public displays of sacrilege and debauchery. The NATO values being forced on the US are decadent European values, not American. We are a dying civilization that views religion as more of a threat than decadence. We need to liberate ourselves from leaders who are dragging us to ruin not try to police the world.Replies: @notbe mk 2, @HA, @John Johnson, @Mark G., @J.Ross
I agree with except with your viewpoint that John is military-I think he is just an idiot. If he is NATO or US military than there is no hope for the NATO or US military.
On the contrary, you and Jack D don't want a variety of sources. I've had to do lots of reading to gain a better perspective on the Russian Federation in general. I can't tell if journalists don't know any of the history of Russia or if they deliberately spout propaganda. The news about Russia is with one voice: NATOs. Journalists aren't doing their job anymore. This is most obvious with coverage of Russia but certainly not limited to that topic. I've had a whole education about Russia and foreign policy since this started and could expand it a bit more. I actually avoid the outright pro-Russian propagandists like Ritter. He is brilliant but isn't informing when he writes about Russia. Most others simply have a foreign policy preference that views Russia in friendly terms if not as an outright ally. People like MacGregor and Mearsheimer view NATO as having expanded into Russia's backyard eliciting a response not unlike ours during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
It is you who refuses to be anything like fair or objective. I, like most who sympathize with Russia, start from the premise that Russia is a friendly country. It is realistic that Russia like Israel or any number of cordial countries will occasionally do things we don't like. This is no reason to end the friendship or to continue Cold War era Containment. The US has a long history of relating to smaller countries by making offers they can't refuse. It is the way things are done no matter how much this gets glossed over with propaganda. The Ukrainian people have not benefited in any way by having NATOs red line drawn in their country. Russia wasn't trying to incorporate Ukraine; the terms for coexisting were clearly laid out in the Minsk agreements. Zelensky and his friends have gotten fantastically rich at the expense of Ukraine and its people. Those postponed elections would have been the end of Zelensky's political career as well as his cash flow. Russia is acting logically to defend itself against NATO encroachment. Putin spent years trying to build a good relationship with NATO and was rewarded with renewed attempts at containment. NATO has no intention of peaceful coexistence; it intends to break up the Russian Federation no doubt to be followed with offers smaller entities like Chechnya can't refuse. Your obfuscation only hides the truth from people who aren't the least bit concerned with learning anything for themselves.
You are obviously military. What I want you to understand is that the US as hegemon is of not benefit to the average American. Putin isn't trying to takeover Eastern Europe. He likely doesn't even have the necessary manpower for such an endeavor. Likewise, China dominating Asia reduced our influence there but doesn't damage the US. We are supposed to be a country with a military mainly used to defend our homeland not a military with a country. If I ever get the word out that all this hullabaloo is about a US empire rather than a free world, things will change rather
quickly. The citizens of this country are being forced to embrace NATO political values that, among other things, exert tight secular control over religion; they're also being marginalized on behalf of a potentially endless supply of immigrants; these immigrants are treated like the victims of those they are displacing and replacing so are given preferential treatment in all matters. The US and NATO currently need to strengthen its relationship with India so the UK and Ireland have had Indian prime ministers while the US has VP Kamala Harris now running for president; that Ramaswampy and Haley were both in the Republican primary debates while no Hispanic candidates we're there to represent an emerging majority ethnicity is very telling.
You keep insisting that those of us who take Russia's side in the proxy war being fought in the Ukraine are naive. The truth is we know that NATO expansion with the continuation of Cold War containment and the new effort to contain China are inextricably linked to unconstitutional policies and mass immigration that harms American citizens. We are the ones being shoved aside so the US and NATO can try to rule the world. The narrative is that evil dictators will sprout like mushrooms if we don't play world police; the truth is that foreign governments have to earn the consent of the governed in order to survive. It's just that people from other cultures tend to value economic efficacy over free speech and are generally more conformist than Westerners. Their governments will be more authoritarian just like their cultures. Odd seeing France display the weakest argument imaginable for free speech with a gay Jew setting up an irreverent reenactment of the Last Supper. No one outside the Western world will be convinced that our civilization is superior by this mockery of what us sacred to Christians. Even many Westerners are losing faith in their own governments because the leadership exhibits such poor judgment. It's one thing to allow freedom of thought, quite another to condone public displays of sacrilege and debauchery. The NATO values being forced on the US are decadent European values, not American. We are a dying civilization that views religion as more of a threat than decadence. We need to liberate ourselves from leaders who are dragging us to ruin not try to police the world.Replies: @notbe mk 2, @HA, @John Johnson, @Mark G., @J.Ross
“Odd seeing France display the weakest argument imaginable for free speech with a gay Jew setting up an irreverent reenactment of the Last Supper. “
Ok, so somewhere in all that drivel is a point to be made? Let’s see — France mocks the Last Supper, ergo, it’s OK for Putin to shred agreements his country signed and invade Ukraine. Because really, he’s one of us.
Or something. That’s the best you can do?
It’s like saying that I don’t like being replaced by the likes of Kamala Harris, so I’m gonna go to Walmart, punch out an employee, and swipe me a flat-screen. And anyone who gets in my way is just a tool to the powers that be.
except Tolstoy’s novel was a 150 years ago-things have a tendency to change.
What's the evidence that he's Jewish? Foucault wasn't Jewish. Mapplethorpe wasn't Jewish.
Jew-baiters gonna Jew-bait.Replies: @ydydy, @Mike Tre, @Linus
Funny, I don’t follow Jew-haters much – I said all I had to say to them from Mount Sinai last month and that’s about it
but though I know almost nothing about Foucault, (if you’re
correct) it seems that the Joo-obsessives so overtook some corners of the culture wars so completely that I never doubted that he was some kind of asshole who was born Jewish.
This without ever having looked into either Foucault or searched any “who is a jew” list either.
So if you’re right, that’s interesting, Joo-obsessives are apparently able to shape popular opinions, even mine.
Being a bit of a snob I blame the Jews.
Were I a gentile who knew few Jews but saw their names predominating various fields while being told that curiosity about the subject was verboten, I too would take to wondering what they were hiding.
Anyhow, unless he turns out to have actually been a glorious and wise man, there’s no need to educate me further regarding Foucault. I appear who have gotten this far in life posessed of misinformation about the single fact I thought I knew about the fella so I figure I can live out the rest of my years without a great deal of additional elucidation.
Russia is a gigantic-assed country with lots of social and racial variation. I assume cohesion is achieved through rule by networks using an autocrat with strong and apparently sincere ties to Orthodox Christianity. Within the Russian networks are financialists/corporatists who merge with global capital. Unlike the Western financial networks the Russians tend to be hostile to the Sabbatean faggotry that was on display in Gay Puree. Putin and his peeps view the Fallen West as a half-dead corpse (no relation) harbouring virulent political and social contagion. What with the leaking viruses and the fat DC neocons who want to constantly attack it, Russia’s gots to have eyes in the back of its head.
Russia has Europe's largest atheist, Ashkenazi and Muslim populations.
Their Slavic population has been in decline since 1991.
It's a nation of losers that it held together by a dwarf dictator who locks away dissenters.Replies: @notbe mk 2, @RadicalCenter
Two French lefties (Melenchon and Bertrand) showing some understanding and goodwill towards Christians insulted by the opening ceremonies:
https://twitter.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1817346827848466592Replies: @J.Ross, @HA
The issue isn’t taking a poke at Christ, who after all can handle it.
The issue is, why didn’t they take a poke at —
Chechens have the capacity to harm Russians.
Like, duh. Hense Kadyrov.
“Historically the violence prone Turkic Chechens”
The Chechens aren’t Turkic. You could at least have perused the Wikipedia page about them before you got on your soapbox.
“It’s like saying that I don’t like being replaced by the likes of Kamala Harris, so I’m gonna go to Walmart, punch out an employee, and swipe me a flat-screen. And anyone who gets in my way is just a tool to the powers that be.”
Ukraine and Merkel shredded the Minsk Accords. Don’t you remember? You obviously can’t hold too many things in mind at one time. Putin doesn’t loot Walmart. Unfortunately some of our US minorities do loot thinking of it as a form of reparations. There are probably some Jamaicans doing this but mostly it’s an American black behavior which has nothing to do with Russia. Your neurons not firing today or something? It’s like you don’t read English so well today. What’s your first language?
Obviously Americans issues with foreign policy cannibalizing domestic resources is of no concern to you. Mind your business, please.
At this very moment a largeish undeclared Great Game is going on between the US and Russia, with the US trying to seduce as many of the post-Soviet countries and former Soviet allies as possible. Armenia is almost gone to the US, Georgian leaders seem to have decided Ukraine II is not for them, Moldova is currently disputed.
All kinds of dodgy dealings in Dagestan and similar places. Those Special Forces Hercules aren't flying to Tblisi and Almaty for the food.
Yesterday a lot of Wagner troops were ambushed and killed in Northern Mali by "Tuareg rebels".
If Russia left the Chechens alone there'd soon be "advisors" along to "help" them. Better Chechnya inside the tent urinating out than outside the tent urinating in.Replies: @John Johnson, @AnotherDad, @RadicalCenter
How you see this depends almost entirely on whether you are nationalist or an imperialist.
I’m a nationalist, so if I was Russian I would very much prefer to see Chechen “pissing” going on in the streets of Boston than in apartments, schools, theatres and subways of my country.
I’d very much not want to see Chechen butts in the air on the streets of Moscow. And most critically, more and more Chechen butts every year as Chechnya is one of the few Russian republics with solidly above replacement fertility while Russian fertility is well below and has slumped back down again with Putin’s adventuring. Chechens are a very different people, and I’d want them out of my tent.
But Putin is a Russian imperialist all butt-hurt about the decline of the Russian Empire from its 1945-1989 peak–decline in status from one of two “superpowers” to just a “great power”. So he sees all those Chechens and thinks “Great! More cannon fodder.”
* doesn't mean to say I'd like to live in Russia, Ukraine or Chechnya - I'm a Brit and they're my people.Replies: @AnotherDad
Putin inherited the Russian Federation as it was. He's working with what he's got. The new territories in former Ukraine are historically and currently ethnic Russian, so he's not breaking your golden rule there.
Seriously though, I've been thinking about why we end up with candidates many people just don't want: Kamala's DIE whitey leftism vs Trump's flirting with dictatorship. Would election reform wrt funding and eligibility for the ballot fix the problem? Would getting rid of primaries yield a better crop of candidates? I get the sense big money donors are choosing the candidates for us though I could be wrong that this is the essence of the problem. Another approach might be allowing say
up to ten candidates and doing runoffs until someone wins. The next four years are going to be miserable for me whoever wins. I know I deserve better leadership because I pay at least a little attention to what goes on in our government. Is there some kind of insurance policy that will buffer citizens against bad government? This just isn't fair.Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @epebble
Maybe RFK, Jr will make a decent showing for a 3rd party candidate
Like Perot and not Nader.
https://www.tmz.com/2024/07/26/rfk-jr-taking-more-votes-from-donald-trump-over-kamala-harris/
In the history of Poland, it has indeed appropriated parts of Russia. Poland-Lithuania was a large asshole neighbor that was eventually whittled down to a much smaller less threatening Poland that now pretends it has only a history of being conquered, never of being an aggressor state. The Russian Federation might have offered Poland back some of its former territory that is currently part of Ukraine if Poland weren't so intent on using NATO membership as a cudgel. Or is it that Poland is making itself into NATOs cudgel?Replies: @John Johnson
The Russian Federation might have offered Poland back some of its former territory that is currently part of Ukraine if Poland weren’t so intent on using NATO membership as a cudgel.
A cudgel or a defensive action? What would have stopped Russia from invading Poland if it wasn’t in NATO?
Has Russia been fair to Poland in the past?
The USSR failed at taking Poland in 1920 but then later succeeded by splitting the country with Hitler. Stalin marched Poles off to the gulag. Did the Poles want to be part of their failed experiment?
Then the USSR forcefully occupied Poland while lying about it having independence.
You’re saying it was a mistake for Poland to join NATO? Russia would have treated them nicely even though Putin is on record stating that the USSR should not have fallen? Which means Putin would have Poland occupied if given the chance. Isn’t that right? That also means he thinks that Moscow should rule over Ukraine and the Baltics.
The Russians seem to think it is their right to occupy every Slavic nation. That characteristic was observed by the British well before NATO existed. Stop trying to make excuses for another Tsar that wants to invade his neighbors because he has massive insecurities. If Putin wasn’t born 5’1 then this war wouldn’t exist. We all know that isn’t his only insecurity. Anyone who needs a 1.3 billion dollar mansion has major compensation issues.
Think about it and get back to us about it using the term "holy f... sorry guys I got manipulated again. Thank you notbe mk 2 for pointing out another absurdity that cannot actually exist in real life when you really think about it using reason and logical analysis instead of just gonads and mere pure faith in the trustworthiness of my overlords. Thanks notbe mk2 for helping me think clearly, you are now five for five, how do you do it?"Replies: @Hunsdon
This is all very one-sided and an exercise in audacity to mention the Brits as supposedly being the diametric opposites of Russian imperialists; the Brits nearly invented imperialism and I'm the citizen of a country that was once one of its colonies. In fact, I'm not certain the Brits don't strive to effectively dominate US policy in the here and now. From my observations, the Russian Federation is a looser Federation than the EU or the US with its famed States Rights. Putin works hard to maintain strong ties with the regions further east. If I'm not mistaken this would be the outer empire. Makes sense that more remote regions with more homogeneous ethnic populations might need some attention so they don't feel alienated, doesn't it. As far as the Baltic states are concerned, I'm sure Russia would like cooperative relationships more than political opposition but this may take the form of a Belarus or even Turkey not incorporated into Russia. Less headache when neutrality and trade relations are what really matters. It's ridiculous to caricature Putin as a compulsive imperialist grabbing up as much territory as he can. Does Russia really need more land? No and that's not the objective. The low likelihood of military conflict with neighbors as well as trade partnerships is what Russia seeks. It's all the rage. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization, BRICS (and adding more) and becoming independent of the U S dollar are Russia's and China's central objectives. The full development of the Eastern hemisphere is underway. This hackneyed conceptualization of Putin as the imperialist little dictator is a dead end.
BTW, about that height fixation of yours. I'm the shortest member of the short side of my family. The other side of the family has a bunch of tall skinny females who hardly even notice that I'm shorter than your lowest estimate of Putin's height. This is truly a worn out ad hominem. I'm certainly tired of it. It's obvious Putin has a strong personality which generally means no one pays much attention his height. But, honestly, he's going to conquer a country because he's mad about being under tall, really? Better short than a dork like John Johnson.
North Korea will remain the funkiest country in the “Axis of Evil”.
Although, perhaps the Chinese will Get Lucky:
On the contrary, you and Jack D don't want a variety of sources. I've had to do lots of reading to gain a better perspective on the Russian Federation in general. I can't tell if journalists don't know any of the history of Russia or if they deliberately spout propaganda. The news about Russia is with one voice: NATOs. Journalists aren't doing their job anymore. This is most obvious with coverage of Russia but certainly not limited to that topic. I've had a whole education about Russia and foreign policy since this started and could expand it a bit more. I actually avoid the outright pro-Russian propagandists like Ritter. He is brilliant but isn't informing when he writes about Russia. Most others simply have a foreign policy preference that views Russia in friendly terms if not as an outright ally. People like MacGregor and Mearsheimer view NATO as having expanded into Russia's backyard eliciting a response not unlike ours during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
It is you who refuses to be anything like fair or objective. I, like most who sympathize with Russia, start from the premise that Russia is a friendly country. It is realistic that Russia like Israel or any number of cordial countries will occasionally do things we don't like. This is no reason to end the friendship or to continue Cold War era Containment. The US has a long history of relating to smaller countries by making offers they can't refuse. It is the way things are done no matter how much this gets glossed over with propaganda. The Ukrainian people have not benefited in any way by having NATOs red line drawn in their country. Russia wasn't trying to incorporate Ukraine; the terms for coexisting were clearly laid out in the Minsk agreements. Zelensky and his friends have gotten fantastically rich at the expense of Ukraine and its people. Those postponed elections would have been the end of Zelensky's political career as well as his cash flow. Russia is acting logically to defend itself against NATO encroachment. Putin spent years trying to build a good relationship with NATO and was rewarded with renewed attempts at containment. NATO has no intention of peaceful coexistence; it intends to break up the Russian Federation no doubt to be followed with offers smaller entities like Chechnya can't refuse. Your obfuscation only hides the truth from people who aren't the least bit concerned with learning anything for themselves.
You are obviously military. What I want you to understand is that the US as hegemon is of not benefit to the average American. Putin isn't trying to takeover Eastern Europe. He likely doesn't even have the necessary manpower for such an endeavor. Likewise, China dominating Asia reduced our influence there but doesn't damage the US. We are supposed to be a country with a military mainly used to defend our homeland not a military with a country. If I ever get the word out that all this hullabaloo is about a US empire rather than a free world, things will change rather
quickly. The citizens of this country are being forced to embrace NATO political values that, among other things, exert tight secular control over religion; they're also being marginalized on behalf of a potentially endless supply of immigrants; these immigrants are treated like the victims of those they are displacing and replacing so are given preferential treatment in all matters. The US and NATO currently need to strengthen its relationship with India so the UK and Ireland have had Indian prime ministers while the US has VP Kamala Harris now running for president; that Ramaswampy and Haley were both in the Republican primary debates while no Hispanic candidates we're there to represent an emerging majority ethnicity is very telling.
You keep insisting that those of us who take Russia's side in the proxy war being fought in the Ukraine are naive. The truth is we know that NATO expansion with the continuation of Cold War containment and the new effort to contain China are inextricably linked to unconstitutional policies and mass immigration that harms American citizens. We are the ones being shoved aside so the US and NATO can try to rule the world. The narrative is that evil dictators will sprout like mushrooms if we don't play world police; the truth is that foreign governments have to earn the consent of the governed in order to survive. It's just that people from other cultures tend to value economic efficacy over free speech and are generally more conformist than Westerners. Their governments will be more authoritarian just like their cultures. Odd seeing France display the weakest argument imaginable for free speech with a gay Jew setting up an irreverent reenactment of the Last Supper. No one outside the Western world will be convinced that our civilization is superior by this mockery of what us sacred to Christians. Even many Westerners are losing faith in their own governments because the leadership exhibits such poor judgment. It's one thing to allow freedom of thought, quite another to condone public displays of sacrilege and debauchery. The NATO values being forced on the US are decadent European values, not American. We are a dying civilization that views religion as more of a threat than decadence. We need to liberate ourselves from leaders who are dragging us to ruin not try to police the world.Replies: @notbe mk 2, @HA, @John Johnson, @Mark G., @J.Ross
On the contrary, you and Jack D don’t want a variety of sources.
That’s not true at all. I wouldn’t censor anyone and I routinely watch videos from the pro-Putin bloggers.
I’ve been calling out their BULLSHIT from day one and I’ll keep doing it.
“The war is over” Macgregor and Ritter in the first two weeks of the war and every 3-6 months since.
My presence obviously bothers you and you amusingly don’t see the irony in criticizing Jack D and I as if we are some troublesome duo.
The fact that we are often the minority and yet it still bothers you to where you write a wall of text speaks volumes. Why can’t you just respond when you disagree and provide a source? Do dissenting views bother you that much?
I don’t support censoring anyone and yet in both Ukraine and anti-vaxx threads I have had posters suggest I be banned on account of (fill in excuse due to lacking a counter-argument).
In the anti-vaxx threads there were even posters that didn’t want Unz posting. They were outraged that he wasn’t an anti-vaxxer and some even suggested starting a new website.
Journalists aren’t doing their job anymore.
I’ve said that many times but that doesn’t mean you should turn off your brain and become a zombie when reading alternative sources.
You are obviously military.
Well in the anti-vaxx threads I was told that I was obviously a paid pharm plant. I’ve also been told that I’m a Hasbara agent. Well some of you have to be wrong, correct? It’s actually the normal position out of Unz to support Ukraine and be vaccinated. I can even provide global polls on that.
Russia wasn’t trying to incorporate Ukraine; the terms for coexisting were clearly laid out in the Minsk agreements.
What was Russia doing in the outskirts of Kiev? You are telling me they weren’t planning on taking the entire country? Why were they trying to take an airport near the city? Was the bounty on Zelensky a fabrication?
What I want you to understand is that the US as hegemon is of not benefit to the average American. Putin isn’t trying to takeover Eastern Europe.
I never said he was trying to take all of Eastern Europe. Of course he won’t try to take NATO countries. Do most Ukrainians want to ruled by Putin? Why don’t you answer that simple question for us.
I’ve not a fan of the US ruling powers but I don’t see why I should support the subjugation of the Ukrainian people to a totalitarian state where journalists get 5 years for questioning the government. Why don’t you explain how this war changes what you don’t like about America. Putin takes down some Ukrainian flags and replaces them with Russian flags while creating graveyards of Orthodox men. How does that change our status quo?
It's an outrage that our government is spending huge sums of our tax money in Ukraine and involving us in war risks we don't need to be taking. Americans should not be supporting the liberation of Ukraine from totalitarian Russia or the defense of Russia from aggressive NATO or whatever you want to call it or whatever side you are on. We don't belong there at all.
We already have a serious threat to our security and prosperity in this country; it is coming from our treasonous leaders. Open borders, DEI, and the loss of our constitutional liberties are the threat. Every word you write about Ukraine, every dollar we spend there, is a stupid diversion from where our attention should be.
I don't care if baddie Putin defeats goodie Zelensky, or if goodie Zelensky defeats baddie Putin. Same for the Middle East. I don't care whether the winner is the nasty Israelis or the nasty Palestinians.
US out of NATO. US out of the Middle East. Put our troops to work deporting illegals. The war that matters is here, not over there.Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @HA, @Jack D
You've lost the plot. Elsewhere I've said I don't want the US deciding these matters or getting into the fray when a conflict doesn't directly concern us. Now your crack about journalists reveals you as ignorant enough to think Ukraine has free speech. No one who reports Ukraine is losing from within Ukraine even lives to see the inside of a prison. Problem solved, I guess. Putin wasn't ruling Ukraine or attempting to do so. "We're fighting oppression" is such a great rallying cry but in this case means nothing. Was Putin planning on treating native Ukrainian speakers as badly as they treat native Russian speakers? Of course not. The US status quo currently consists of pretending the USSR still exists and all we have to do is beat those Ruskies. I'd like to bring my people into the present decade and century. I think they'd get a kick out of it and would probably make more relevant political choices to boot!Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
On the contrary, you and Jack D don't want a variety of sources. I've had to do lots of reading to gain a better perspective on the Russian Federation in general. I can't tell if journalists don't know any of the history of Russia or if they deliberately spout propaganda. The news about Russia is with one voice: NATOs. Journalists aren't doing their job anymore. This is most obvious with coverage of Russia but certainly not limited to that topic. I've had a whole education about Russia and foreign policy since this started and could expand it a bit more. I actually avoid the outright pro-Russian propagandists like Ritter. He is brilliant but isn't informing when he writes about Russia. Most others simply have a foreign policy preference that views Russia in friendly terms if not as an outright ally. People like MacGregor and Mearsheimer view NATO as having expanded into Russia's backyard eliciting a response not unlike ours during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
It is you who refuses to be anything like fair or objective. I, like most who sympathize with Russia, start from the premise that Russia is a friendly country. It is realistic that Russia like Israel or any number of cordial countries will occasionally do things we don't like. This is no reason to end the friendship or to continue Cold War era Containment. The US has a long history of relating to smaller countries by making offers they can't refuse. It is the way things are done no matter how much this gets glossed over with propaganda. The Ukrainian people have not benefited in any way by having NATOs red line drawn in their country. Russia wasn't trying to incorporate Ukraine; the terms for coexisting were clearly laid out in the Minsk agreements. Zelensky and his friends have gotten fantastically rich at the expense of Ukraine and its people. Those postponed elections would have been the end of Zelensky's political career as well as his cash flow. Russia is acting logically to defend itself against NATO encroachment. Putin spent years trying to build a good relationship with NATO and was rewarded with renewed attempts at containment. NATO has no intention of peaceful coexistence; it intends to break up the Russian Federation no doubt to be followed with offers smaller entities like Chechnya can't refuse. Your obfuscation only hides the truth from people who aren't the least bit concerned with learning anything for themselves.
You are obviously military. What I want you to understand is that the US as hegemon is of not benefit to the average American. Putin isn't trying to takeover Eastern Europe. He likely doesn't even have the necessary manpower for such an endeavor. Likewise, China dominating Asia reduced our influence there but doesn't damage the US. We are supposed to be a country with a military mainly used to defend our homeland not a military with a country. If I ever get the word out that all this hullabaloo is about a US empire rather than a free world, things will change rather
quickly. The citizens of this country are being forced to embrace NATO political values that, among other things, exert tight secular control over religion; they're also being marginalized on behalf of a potentially endless supply of immigrants; these immigrants are treated like the victims of those they are displacing and replacing so are given preferential treatment in all matters. The US and NATO currently need to strengthen its relationship with India so the UK and Ireland have had Indian prime ministers while the US has VP Kamala Harris now running for president; that Ramaswampy and Haley were both in the Republican primary debates while no Hispanic candidates we're there to represent an emerging majority ethnicity is very telling.
You keep insisting that those of us who take Russia's side in the proxy war being fought in the Ukraine are naive. The truth is we know that NATO expansion with the continuation of Cold War containment and the new effort to contain China are inextricably linked to unconstitutional policies and mass immigration that harms American citizens. We are the ones being shoved aside so the US and NATO can try to rule the world. The narrative is that evil dictators will sprout like mushrooms if we don't play world police; the truth is that foreign governments have to earn the consent of the governed in order to survive. It's just that people from other cultures tend to value economic efficacy over free speech and are generally more conformist than Westerners. Their governments will be more authoritarian just like their cultures. Odd seeing France display the weakest argument imaginable for free speech with a gay Jew setting up an irreverent reenactment of the Last Supper. No one outside the Western world will be convinced that our civilization is superior by this mockery of what us sacred to Christians. Even many Westerners are losing faith in their own governments because the leadership exhibits such poor judgment. It's one thing to allow freedom of thought, quite another to condone public displays of sacrilege and debauchery. The NATO values being forced on the US are decadent European values, not American. We are a dying civilization that views religion as more of a threat than decadence. We need to liberate ourselves from leaders who are dragging us to ruin not try to police the world.Replies: @notbe mk 2, @HA, @John Johnson, @Mark G., @J.Ross
“Putin isn’t trying to take over Eastern Europe.”
It is necessary, though, to act as if he is. Then, following that, it is necessary to act like he will then invade Western Europe and Alaska.
This resurrection of the Vietnam era domino theory is being done to try to justify continuing spending 900 billion dollars a year on our bloated military. In constant dollar terms, this is twice what we were spending under Eisenhower. Eisenhower avoided becoming involved in Vietnam and warned upon leaving office that the military-industrial complex would always be trying to manufacture foreign threats in order to keep military spending up.
Elon Musk just posted on X that the federal government is headed towards bankruptcy, pointing to the trillion dollars we are spending just on interest on the growing federal debt this year. Like all the other overextended empires of the past, we will be entering a future era of contraction.
As Herb Stein said: "Something too good to last, won't."
But this collapse has been predicted for the last half century.
And...
The Haka thing isn’t intimidating so much as annoying. Perhaps a single individual with a group of Maori warriors would feel fear. They would eat you, after all.
But as a member of a well-armed company, I must confess I would enjoy decimating those jackasses. No poignancy for a noble savage foe either, just ruthless extermination of dipshits. That tat’s are also a sign of degeneracy. Several volleys followed by a bayonet charge singing Men of Harlech.
Shades of Pat Buchannan. Google autocomplete is censoring the Trump assassination.
https://www.infowars.com/posts/google-censoring-searches-about-trump-assassination-attempt/
I tried it and had same result (Bing and Google).
I'm a nationalist, so if I was Russian I would very much prefer to see Chechen "pissing" going on in the streets of Boston than in apartments, schools, theatres and subways of my country.
I'd very much not want to see Chechen butts in the air on the streets of Moscow. And most critically, more and more Chechen butts every year as Chechnya is one of the few Russian republics with solidly above replacement fertility while Russian fertility is well below and has slumped back down again with Putin's adventuring. Chechens are a very different people, and I'd want them out of my tent.
But Putin is a Russian imperialist all butt-hurt about the decline of the Russian Empire from its 1945-1989 peak--decline in status from one of two "superpowers" to just a "great power". So he sees all those Chechens and thinks "Great! More cannon fodder."Replies: @John Johnson, @YetAnotherAnon, @Cagey Beast
Russian republics with solidly above replacement fertility while Russian fertility is well below and has slumped back down again with Putin’s adventuring.
That’s correct and he only started cracking down on abortion after he started conscripting. For the previous 20 years he was fine with Moscow being the abortion capital of Europe. His fanboys hate talking about their abortion rate from previous years. Of course we don’t know the current actual abortion rate as any stat from Russia at the moment is obviously suspect. We do know however that they have had negative population growth since 1991 and you are correct that Chechnya is the outlier. That also means their Slavic abortion rate is much higher because they will average in the Muslims who don’t use abortion.
Their high abortion rate is not from Western influence but is actually inherited from the USSR. The USSR not only promoted atheism (the soul doesn’t exist) but that abortion is just as fine as any form of birth control. Russia still has Europe’s largest atheist population and it is of course disproportionately Slavic.
But Putin is a Russian imperialist all butt-hurt about the decline of the Russian Empire from its 1945-1989 peak–decline in status from one of two “superpowers” to just a “great power”. So he sees all those Chechens and thinks “Great! More cannon fodder.”
He is completely butt hurt and even said that the USSR should not have fallen. He has also said that Communism doesn’t work. So he just wants the totalitarian aspect of the USSR but without all the proletarian bullshit. Basically he wants the evil empire and he was hoping to rebuild most of it with Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova. It was already leaked that they plan on taking Belarus by slowly undermining their autonomy. A true dwarf of the ages. A little pyscho that has supporters here out of spite for the West and not because they want what is best for the Russian or Ukrainian people.
All our efforts now have to be centered on that Moldova has to retain its autonomy. Where do I sign my tax dollars to pay off Moldovan politicians so they have a spine? I mean if Putin controls Moldova he controls the world supply of...whatever Moldova supplies...which is (I have to look it up but I'm sure it's extremely important).
I sure I speak for a lot of people who feel the West now has to print more money which we don't really have to ensure Moldova is Moldova, united and inseparable because like well...because.
I, however, have a minor tactical quibble-we have to prioritize something so what do think? Should we pour more money which we don't have into Moldova or Quemoy and Matsu? Remember those two beacons of democracy were really important in the Kennedy-Nixon debates and then they were forgotten because really nobody gives f.... except Unz trolls and they moved onto crying over Belarus and Moldova.
Moldova or Quemoy and Matsu, choices, choices who said geopolitics was ever easy!Replies: @John Johnson
https://youtu.be/YvKjFmDrItg?si=AEx41OsXgLXVgDvk
Speaking of the Religion of Peace, I imagine Paris is hunkered down over that blasphemous portrayal of Muhammad's Revelations in Thomas Jolly's opening ceremonies.
I'm kidding of course. Thomas Jolly may be a decadent Jewish homosexual but he's no fool. No need to have a Charlie Hebdo-sized target on his back. Christians can always be counted on to bend over and take one for the team.Replies: @AnotherDad, @AnotherDad, @Bardon Kaldian, @anon, @For what it's worth, @Ennui, @36 ulster
It was all a misunderstanding. It’s supposed to be a Bacchanalian scene. You know, the thing everybody around the world thinks about when they see a panoramic view tableau with 13 people at a long table with one person in the middle. So sorry, our apologies. Wink, wink.
Kevin Costner in his cowboy get up looks on stoically and say “Why that’s Dionysius. I don’t know why you MAGA boys are feelin’ so threatened.”
What's the evidence that he's Jewish? Foucault wasn't Jewish. Mapplethorpe wasn't Jewish.
Jew-baiters gonna Jew-bait.Replies: @ydydy, @Mike Tre, @Linus
“What’s the evidence that he’s Jewish?”
Olympic officials fix mistake after wrong anthem for South Sudan
This happens a lot. I vaguely recall an incident at the 1992 or 1994 Olympics regarding some newly independent country, but that may just have been a delay until they found the sheet music. It didn’t make this list:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wrong_anthems_incidents
Some were understandable goofs, such as Nigeria/Niger, Slovakia/Slovenia, China/Chile. One year, Kazakhstan suffered hearing the theme from Borat as well as “Livin’ La Vida Loca”. That should have been played at this game– South Sudan defeated Puerto Rico.
Yes, Puerto Rico has her own Olympic team. (Too bad the District of Columbia doesn’t.) We should all support los borinqueños and the continued existence of their Olympic squad. And remind our fellow Americans of this at every opportunity.
How’s Chechnya doing at the Paris Games?
I'm glad. Rooting for the underdog is always satisfying, so it's good to see very poor South Sudan defeat wealthy Puerto Rico (Puerto Rico is "poor" only in comparison to the rest of the US).
https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2024/7/26/which-countries-have-been-banned-from-participating-in-the-olympics
John do you actually believe Putin’s mansion cost 1.3 billion or is it just another piece of propaganda that intelligence agencies pull out of their ass to persuade naive, unthinking people like you to die in wars?
Think about it and get back to us about it using the term “holy f… sorry guys I got manipulated again. Thank you notbe mk 2 for pointing out another absurdity that cannot actually exist in real life when you really think about it using reason and logical analysis instead of just gonads and mere pure faith in the trustworthiness of my overlords. Thanks notbe mk2 for helping me think clearly, you are now five for five, how do you do it?”
Did any of those former Soviet countries ever want to join the USSR? Answer: No. There is no conspiracy to seduce them. Most of those countries want closer ties so they can maintain their independence from the dwarf tsar or whatever Russia comes up with next.
Sometimes the asshole neighbor is just an asshole and that doesn't have anything to do with the guy up the street.
Before the revolution the Russians viewed their conquered neighbors as "Little Russians" even if they wanted nothing to do with them. They viewed parts of Poland as belonging to them even though the Kingdom of Poland existed before Russia. After the revolution it was all Soviet territory and of course there was never a vote on if these countries wanted to join the great failed experiment.
If Russia left the Chechens alone there’d soon be “advisors” along to “help” them. Better Chechnya inside the tent urinating out than outside the tent urinating in.
Russia: Chechnya wants independence so we need to invade them.
Russia: DPR/LPR wants independence so we need to back them.
Putin is just another Tsar that is full of shit and can't even keep a consistent narrative for his pathetic defenders. He decreed DPR/LPR to be independent nations and has since taken them as vanilla territory. They don't even get semi-autonomous status like Chechnya.Replies: @unintended consequence, @Ennui, @Anonymous
Poland gave as good as it got. They have nothing to complain about, unless you think Poland or Lithuania extends to the Black Sea. A good many proto-Ukrainians didn’t care for Polish rule, either. Bogdan, sorry Bohdan, Khmelnytsky wasn’t out there fighting by himself.
Georgia basically begged the Russians to come down and protect them from the Qajars. Chechens were mountain raiders. Raiders got got. They gave as good as they got, no point in complaining.
The only people who have a real right to complain are the hunter-gatherer peoples of Siberia or the Tajik mountain people of the Himalayas. Everybody else in the old Russian empire to some degree or another played the game of warring and raiding and lost out.
Indeed, some of them had a better deal under the Russians than before. Central Asians only rebelled when Russians started drafting them to fight in WW1.
“It is necessary, though, to act as if he is. Then, following that, it is necessary to act like he will then invade Western Europe and Alaska.”
Yeah, that’s weird how Putin gets to promote generals who claim Ukraine is just a stepping stone, how Putin has children’s choirs singing songs of praise to him about how they’ll take back Alaska, but it’s those OUTSIDE of Russia who are putting on the act and demanding that the rest play along. That Nuland must be some 4d chessmaster wizard if she can pull even Putin’s puppet strings and get him to act in her little play.
And the fanboys are telling us how Russia was grumbling for years about how it would get really angry if NATO were to “take over” Ukraine, but we were too stupid to heed the warning signs. But now, they’re like “What warning signs? I don’t see any warning signs — it’s all an act!”
No one is claiming Russians will be gunning for any part of Western Europe any time soon (well, except perhaps maybe a slice of Germany, like the one they de facto controlled previously though that, too, is farther down the road), but even allowing Russia to take over what the West cruelly and unfairly took away in Eastern Europe (because, according to Moscow and its fanboys, anything that Moscow controls must remain in their backyard forever or else it’s the meanies in NATO who are to blame!) would bring us back to the bad old days of the Cold War when we were getting into bed with all sorts of nasty regimes just to make sure the Communists didn’t take over. You people want to claim Zelensky is a dictator for not holding elections when close to a quarter of his country is under occupation, and a good chunk of the rest is getting shelled, but your memories are short — that’s not nearly as bad as what’ll likely happen once Putin gets to control what he wants to control. The first thing that’ll be sacrificed is that very mult-polarity that Putin claims to be in favor of, given that countries who ought to have a say in how they run their own affairs (e.g. Ukraine) will just be trampled into oblivion.
Even if what he’s trying to resurrect is not the USSR 2.0, exactly, and even if Alaska is dead last on his wish list, he still needs to be contained BEFORE he’s in any position to that.
Again, a dictator doesn’t have to be on the level of Hitler to be a really bad guy who needs to be pushed back, but I get it — you’re only opposed to fascism when you want to take a dig at Twinkie or something.
Schäffer affair
Even in Hawaii, Russia is Taboo: The Fate of Fort Elizabeth
And as long as you're linking to MEMRI, they quote a Lebanese politician thus: A tad histrionic, even by Unz standards. Trump voters are West Bank settlers? That's the colored mind for you. His brother Ghaleb says Georgians were criminals, yes, but they weren't "fleeing justice". Their transportation here was the justice. As for the other colonies...
I had to look up the Kandil/Qandil brothers-- Maronite? Melkite? Mohammedan? Druze? According to Arabic-language Wikipedia, Nasser was "one of the founders of the Permanent Conference of Lebanese Seculars, headed by Bishop Grégoire Haddad in 1986." Their name indeed means "candle".
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wrong_anthems_incidentsSome were understandable goofs, such as Nigeria/Niger, Slovakia/Slovenia, China/Chile. One year, Kazakhstan suffered hearing the theme from Borat as well as "Livin' La Vida Loca". That should have been played at this game-- South Sudan defeated Puerto Rico.Yes, Puerto Rico has her own Olympic team. (Too bad the District of Columbia doesn't.) We should all support los borinqueños and the continued existence of their Olympic squad. And remind our fellow Americans of this at every opportunity.How's Chechnya doing at the Paris Games?Replies: @notbe mk 2, @prosa123, @Frau Katze
Actually on an international stage there is no excuse for confusing Nigeria/Niger, Slovakia/Slovenia, China/Chile-absolutely no excuse for that. Kazakhstan hearing the theme from Borat or Vida Loca should never have happened. There is such a thing as being a Protocol Officer and they get big bucks for being Protocol Officers. If a Protocol Officer confuses Slovenia and Slovakia that is pure absolute incompetence.
Playing "God Save the Queen" for the US wouldn't even be much of an error, as the tune is also an anthem for us, albeit "unofficial". Both that and the "official" one set American words to a British tune.
That they play the top Google hit for "Hong Kong's anthem" rather than the CCP dirge is downright delicious.Replies: @notbe mk 2, @prosa123
https://i.postimg.cc/4yktJFW9/1722181098130668.pngReplies: @Corpse Tooth, @Anonymous
Supposedly Biden searches also being scrubbed. I tried “Biden resig” and got nothing. It may just be some election “Mommy knows best” stuff, not per se targeting conservatives.
But it’s still bizarre to censor the results at all. And it is prone to being manipulated. We all remember Pat Buchannan.
Give me a break. Biden didn't "resign" jack. He's still president. He WITHDREW from the race, and when I type in 'Biden withd", the full completion appears. Why would only one of those terms be scrubbed and not the other?Replies: @Anonymous
except mocking the Last Supper with transvestites is totally filthy and blasphemous and lots of other really, really bad things-it was kind of understood that people kind of go to Hell for this. Leaving Putin aside, that this happen shows a very serious degeneracy in the Western body politic and it genuinely cannot be left alone. Again forget about Putin but truly a society that actually does that in front of the whole world really cannot be trusted in almost anything since anything it does now is seen to have a hidden Luciferian agenda. No-one cannot defend that by saying sure we kind of made a decadent spectacle but Putin is not a nice guy so these two cancel each other out. What happened in Paris is really beyond the pale.
Good: kill globohomo culture!Replies: @Roderick Spode
Curious what type of music you listen to, NR.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wrong_anthems_incidentsSome were understandable goofs, such as Nigeria/Niger, Slovakia/Slovenia, China/Chile. One year, Kazakhstan suffered hearing the theme from Borat as well as "Livin' La Vida Loca". That should have been played at this game-- South Sudan defeated Puerto Rico.Yes, Puerto Rico has her own Olympic team. (Too bad the District of Columbia doesn't.) We should all support los borinqueños and the continued existence of their Olympic squad. And remind our fellow Americans of this at every opportunity.How's Chechnya doing at the Paris Games?Replies: @notbe mk 2, @prosa123, @Frau Katze
South Sudan defeated Puerto Rico.
I’m glad. Rooting for the underdog is always satisfying, so it’s good to see very poor South Sudan defeat wealthy Puerto Rico (Puerto Rico is “poor” only in comparison to the rest of the US).
I'm a nationalist, so if I was Russian I would very much prefer to see Chechen "pissing" going on in the streets of Boston than in apartments, schools, theatres and subways of my country.
I'd very much not want to see Chechen butts in the air on the streets of Moscow. And most critically, more and more Chechen butts every year as Chechnya is one of the few Russian republics with solidly above replacement fertility while Russian fertility is well below and has slumped back down again with Putin's adventuring. Chechens are a very different people, and I'd want them out of my tent.
But Putin is a Russian imperialist all butt-hurt about the decline of the Russian Empire from its 1945-1989 peak--decline in status from one of two "superpowers" to just a "great power". So he sees all those Chechens and thinks "Great! More cannon fodder."Replies: @John Johnson, @YetAnotherAnon, @Cagey Beast
I generally have a great deal of time for ADs views, on domestic policy he’s top notch.
AD, you know that US elites lie to you all the time about race, about sexuality, about family formation, about immigration, about industrial policy – i.e. about stuff you know about and can see in front of your eyes.
Then the minute the subject is one where you have to take someone else’s word – like Russia – you drink in the narrative of those same elites as if it’s gospel. Sad!
But I think perhaps AD is capable of seeing the light*. JJ, on the other hand, is a creature of darkness.
* doesn’t mean to say I’d like to live in Russia, Ukraine or Chechnya – I’m a Brit and they’re my people.
But the "word" I'm taking on Putin is .... Putin's!--his words and his actions. This is a guy who blabbers on about Bessarabia and how the breakup of the Soviet Union was a tragedy. There's only one way a serious person can interpret all that. It's that Putin is a guy who thinks that the Russian Empire was a good thing and Russia just ought--by some sort of historical cultural wonderfulness--to be dominant culturally and politically across a vast stretch of territory full of people who are not Russian and do not want to be dominated.
And not just words, Putin fought a war--and leveled Grozny to keep Chechnya *in* Russia--an action which has not just zero, but tangible negative benefit to the actual Russian people. It would be like the US leveling San Juan during some Puerto Rican uprising for independence. Which might excite deep state imperialist types, but would have ordinary Americans going "Huh? This is stupid!" And Puerto Ricans even as mixed as they are are actually less trouble and threat (TFR 1.0) than the Chechens (2.7) are to Russia.
No Putin's ideology should have died a well deserved death after 1914--when the Russians and Austrians dragged the rest of Europe into the Great War. The whole history of the 20th century is one of imperially induced slaughter--rising Germany and Japan chafing at the existing imperial world order of the British and French and to a lesser extent Dutch and American empires and looking to build grand ones of their own. Then further conflicts as some empires--particularly the French--refused to let go. And the Russian Empire--reinvigorated by victory in the War--dominating and oppressing Eastern Europe and the Americans and Russians fighting proxy wars all over.
No, I don't need any guidance from our own deep state goons on Putin. I've got no use for Putin, or his imperialism--straight up. I don't swoon over the guy because he's better on queers/globohomo than our goons. Nor because he's in conflict with our deep state goons. And when a bunch of commenters here babble about "used to be Russian" or "historically part of Russia" (i.e. the Russian Empire) that only reinforces my point. It's a better world if the Hungarians, Czechs, Poles, Romanians, Latvians, Estonians, Finns, Georgians, Armenians, Azeris ... and yes even the Ukrainians and Chechens are not bossed around by Russians. (And the Russians had a leader focused on stopping the muslim immivasion and affordable family formation for Russians.) The one thing everyone sentient ought to be able to agree on after the last century is the right of various peoples to have their own nations and *not* be bossed around by other peoples.
Heck, I wish we normie Americans could get that--out from under the bossy parasitic immivasion loving goons--here in the USA.Replies: @Jack D, @YetAnotherAnon, @RadicalCenter
Oh my God! Belarus will lose its autonomy!…and Moldova is next! Moldova! Moldova! John, I admit I thought you were quite the fool but now I understand now where you are coming from (but seriously I had really good reasons for thinking that considering your real estate valuation skills among others). I now know, however, that your argument that Belarus will lead to Moldova shows your strategic acumen and here I thought you just needed a girlfriend.
All our efforts now have to be centered on that Moldova has to retain its autonomy. Where do I sign my tax dollars to pay off Moldovan politicians so they have a spine? I mean if Putin controls Moldova he controls the world supply of…whatever Moldova supplies…which is (I have to look it up but I’m sure it’s extremely important).
I sure I speak for a lot of people who feel the West now has to print more money which we don’t really have to ensure Moldova is Moldova, united and inseparable because like well…because.
I, however, have a minor tactical quibble-we have to prioritize something so what do think? Should we pour more money which we don’t have into Moldova or Quemoy and Matsu? Remember those two beacons of democracy were really important in the Kennedy-Nixon debates and then they were forgotten because really nobody gives f…. except Unz trolls and they moved onto crying over Belarus and Moldova.
Moldova or Quemoy and Matsu, choices, choices who said geopolitics was ever easy!
“The Russians seem to think it is their right to occupy every Slavic nation. That characteristic was observed by the British well before NATO existed. Stop trying to make excuses for another Tsar that wants to invade his neighbors because he has massive insecurities. If Putin wasn’t born 5’1 then this war wouldn’t exist.”
This is all very one-sided and an exercise in audacity to mention the Brits as supposedly being the diametric opposites of Russian imperialists; the Brits nearly invented imperialism and I’m the citizen of a country that was once one of its colonies. In fact, I’m not certain the Brits don’t strive to effectively dominate US policy in the here and now. From my observations, the Russian Federation is a looser Federation than the EU or the US with its famed States Rights. Putin works hard to maintain strong ties with the regions further east. If I’m not mistaken this would be the outer empire. Makes sense that more remote regions with more homogeneous ethnic populations might need some attention so they don’t feel alienated, doesn’t it. As far as the Baltic states are concerned, I’m sure Russia would like cooperative relationships more than political opposition but this may take the form of a Belarus or even Turkey not incorporated into Russia. Less headache when neutrality and trade relations are what really matters. It’s ridiculous to caricature Putin as a compulsive imperialist grabbing up as much territory as he can. Does Russia really need more land? No and that’s not the objective. The low likelihood of military conflict with neighbors as well as trade partnerships is what Russia seeks. It’s all the rage. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization, BRICS (and adding more) and becoming independent of the U S dollar are Russia’s and China’s central objectives. The full development of the Eastern hemisphere is underway. This hackneyed conceptualization of Putin as the imperialist little dictator is a dead end.
BTW, about that height fixation of yours. I’m the shortest member of the short side of my family. The other side of the family has a bunch of tall skinny females who hardly even notice that I’m shorter than your lowest estimate of Putin’s height. This is truly a worn out ad hominem. I’m certainly tired of it. It’s obvious Putin has a strong personality which generally means no one pays much attention his height. But, honestly, he’s going to conquer a country because he’s mad about being under tall, really? Better short than a dork like John Johnson.
no talent whore/slut-I now see why Kadyrov would ban something like this, anyone who didn’t like his decree can start lining up to apologize to him.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wrong_anthems_incidentsSome were understandable goofs, such as Nigeria/Niger, Slovakia/Slovenia, China/Chile. One year, Kazakhstan suffered hearing the theme from Borat as well as "Livin' La Vida Loca". That should have been played at this game-- South Sudan defeated Puerto Rico.Yes, Puerto Rico has her own Olympic team. (Too bad the District of Columbia doesn't.) We should all support los borinqueños and the continued existence of their Olympic squad. And remind our fellow Americans of this at every opportunity.How's Chechnya doing at the Paris Games?Replies: @notbe mk 2, @prosa123, @Frau Katze
According to Al Jazeera Russia & Belarus are persona non grata at this year’s Olympics.
https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2024/7/26/which-countries-have-been-banned-from-participating-in-the-olympics
And not Hawaii? Kauai not?
Schäffer affair
Even in Hawaii, Russia is Taboo: The Fate of Fort Elizabeth
And as long as you’re linking to MEMRI, they quote a Lebanese politician thus:
A tad histrionic, even by Unz standards. Trump voters are West Bank settlers? That’s the colored mind for you. His brother Ghaleb says
Georgians were criminals, yes, but they weren’t “fleeing justice”. Their transportation here was the justice. As for the other colonies…
I had to look up the Kandil/Qandil brothers– Maronite? Melkite? Mohammedan? Druze? According to Arabic-language Wikipedia, Nasser was “one of the founders of the Permanent Conference of Lebanese Seculars, headed by Bishop Grégoire Haddad in 1986.” Their name indeed means “candle”.
I'm a nationalist, so if I was Russian I would very much prefer to see Chechen "pissing" going on in the streets of Boston than in apartments, schools, theatres and subways of my country.
I'd very much not want to see Chechen butts in the air on the streets of Moscow. And most critically, more and more Chechen butts every year as Chechnya is one of the few Russian republics with solidly above replacement fertility while Russian fertility is well below and has slumped back down again with Putin's adventuring. Chechens are a very different people, and I'd want them out of my tent.
But Putin is a Russian imperialist all butt-hurt about the decline of the Russian Empire from its 1945-1989 peak--decline in status from one of two "superpowers" to just a "great power". So he sees all those Chechens and thinks "Great! More cannon fodder."Replies: @John Johnson, @YetAnotherAnon, @Cagey Beast
Would you also consider anyone who holds the office of POTUS an imperialist if he fails to break up the USA into ethnostates?
Putin inherited the Russian Federation as it was. He’s working with what he’s got. The new territories in former Ukraine are historically and currently ethnic Russian, so he’s not breaking your golden rule there.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_Justice_and_Public_Order_Act_1994 Allegedly, this inspired the techno group Autechre to record the track 'Flutter', "in which no two bars have the same beat."
https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/97hmfs/til_in_1994_in_an_attempt_to_ban_raves_the_uk/
My honest guess about this new law? Chechnya has no intent of enforcing this seriously. But I suppose doing so would be theoretically possible. Muslims gonna Muslim.Replies: @Sorel McRae
I see no problem with this ban or with other bans on degenerate culture. Why should anyone other than its promoters? No core political speech or intellectual content is implicated. Move on.
Not even Peine forte et dure is sufficient for these filth,
https://sonar21.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-27-888x1024.pngReplies: @Chrisnonymous
I watched that awful show. It’s not his testicle. He had a rip in his stockings. You coukd see it clearly while he was dancing. Incidentally, that particular freak was the least freaky of them all. He wasn’t obese and danced classical ballet instead of “free-style.”
Two French lefties (Melenchon and Bertrand) showing some understanding and goodwill towards Christians insulted by the opening ceremonies:
https://twitter.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1817346827848466592Replies: @J.Ross, @HA
“Two French lefties (Melenchon and Bertrand) showing some understanding and goodwill towards Christians…”
The blue man who is front and center in that alleged Last Supper tableau (I take it he is supposed to be the main course?) is Philippe Katerine, the paramour of Julie Depardieu, the daughter of noted fanboy Gerard Depardieu (though even he thought that invasion of Ukraine was too much, so he may not qualify as a fanboy anymore — maybe one of Nuland’s perfidious double agents?) and he apparently subsequently spurned his Russian citizenship in favor of official papers of the United Arab Emirates. I guess you just can’t those Westerners to stay loyal!
Debauchery, Russia, fanboys — whew, these conspiracies were so much more fun to unravel when Jews were involved.
We don't all share your obsession, a**hole. Not everything is about your country.Replies: @Reg Cæsar
“In music, it’s often somewhat subjective what subdivision is considered to be the beat.”
RUSH made the case 42 years ago.
American culture I’m told is a cesspool, compliments of Jews and Negroes, and that the GOP presidential nominee, who has the fierce backing of Christians, would like nothing more than to culturally turn back the American clock to the early 1950’s. Isn’t Chechnya’s policy in line with the ideological position of church going, conservative Americans? Why are you seemingly mocking this heroic effort to curb Western cultural influence?
A better question :
What is RonUnz Cudder-off up to lately?
This:
is similar, but much more beautiful. And not at all threatening, unlike a few hundred Chechens dancing in trance.
The colourful former fanboy Gerard Depardieu:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gérard_Depardieu
https://live.staticflickr.com/5014/5536038424_50fdb34332_b.jpgReplies: @Frau Katze, @J.Ross
OT:
https://twitter.com/hunkydory99/status/1817609351571599676
He was talking about something that happened in Paris. You know, in France. Not in Ukraine.
We don’t all share your obsession, a**hole. Not everything is about your country.
Isn’t Chechnya’s policy in line with the ideological position of church going, conservative Americans?
Not at all.
Conservative Americans do not support forced daily prayers with an obnoxious loudspeaker, strange bathroom rules, bans on pork, alcohol, dogs, being clean shaven and most European art.
Not openly.
"with an obnoxious loudspeaker"
Talk to the State Superintendent of Education in Oklahoma.
"strange bathroom rules"
You mean like non-gender restrooms?
"bans on pork, alcohol, dogs, being clean shaven"
Christians have their own prohibitions.
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/List_of_actions_prohibited_by_the_Bible#Food_and_drink
"and most European art".
Citations, please.Replies: @John Johnson, @BB753
The side of Ramdan Kadyrov Steve is not so crazy about… Neocon kryptonite.
Bathroom rules?
“Conservative Americans do not support forced daily prayers”
Not openly.
“with an obnoxious loudspeaker”
Talk to the State Superintendent of Education in Oklahoma.
“strange bathroom rules”
You mean like non-gender restrooms?
“bans on pork, alcohol, dogs, being clean shaven”
Christians have their own prohibitions.
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/List_of_actions_prohibited_by_the_Bible#Food_and_drink
“and most European art”.
Citations, please.
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/List_of_acti"
Do you understand that Old Covenant rules do not apply to Christians? What an ignorant statement! Are you hindoo perchance?
Do you see this flag much?
https://live.staticflickr.com/5014/5536038424_50fdb34332_b.jpgReplies: @Frau Katze, @J.Ross
I’ve never seen that flag. But I don’t get out much.
What's the evidence that he's Jewish? Foucault wasn't Jewish. Mapplethorpe wasn't Jewish.
Jew-baiters gonna Jew-bait.Replies: @ydydy, @Mike Tre, @Linus
Foucault and Mapplethorpe weren’t jewish? Damn, that changes everything.
https://live.staticflickr.com/5014/5536038424_50fdb34332_b.jpgReplies: @Frau Katze, @J.Ross
Have mercy on local vexilollogists and specify.
Steve, Joe looks pretty healthy…
https://worldstar.com/videos/wshh0dIIQTuKQ29R54m3/conspiracy-theorists-are-saying-joe-biden-is-65-now-that-stunt-doubles-have-been-used-all-throughout-bidens-run
Here’s a suggestion – why don’t you support the American people? Your opinions about Russia and Ukraine should be determined by what is best for Americans in West Virginia and Kansas. Russia is not a threat to the security or prosperity of West Virginia. There is zero chance Russian troops will be marching into Topeka. Americans have no security risks on the line in Ukraine.
It’s an outrage that our government is spending huge sums of our tax money in Ukraine and involving us in war risks we don’t need to be taking. Americans should not be supporting the liberation of Ukraine from totalitarian Russia or the defense of Russia from aggressive NATO or whatever you want to call it or whatever side you are on. We don’t belong there at all.
We already have a serious threat to our security and prosperity in this country; it is coming from our treasonous leaders. Open borders, DEI, and the loss of our constitutional liberties are the threat. Every word you write about Ukraine, every dollar we spend there, is a stupid diversion from where our attention should be.
I don’t care if baddie Putin defeats goodie Zelensky, or if goodie Zelensky defeats baddie Putin. Same for the Middle East. I don’t care whether the winner is the nasty Israelis or the nasty Palestinians.
US out of NATO. US out of the Middle East. Put our troops to work deporting illegals. The war that matters is here, not over there.
Hence the anti-Russian hatred of some former Soviet Jews or Canadian Banderites, or the anti-Indian hatred of some Canadian Sikhs.
In Bradford, in the 1990 riots (ostensibly against the BNP), Muslims settled scores by burning out Hindu-owned shops.
Anyway, the idea that in the age of ICBMs what happens in Europe is none of our business is laughable. The ship sailed on isolationism a century ago and it is never returning to port.
Would you say that the struggle between Russia and Ukraine is a "quarrel in a far-away country between people of whom we know nothing"? Some idiot tried that line once and history proved that he could not have been more wrong.
https://encyc.org/wiki/Chamberlain's_Radio_Broadcast,_September_27,_1938
Maybe back then such ignorance could be forgiven but now, after all that we have seen?
It’s the flag of your franco-colombiens neighbors.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franco-Columbian
Every province and territory has its own version, except Quebec. They don’t need one. The best are those of NWT and Nunavut. There are fewer than 600 Francophones in the latter, but they have their own flag!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Canadian_flags#Francophone_peoples
https://flagmartcanada.com/collections/francophone-flags-of-canada
I’m willing to bet there isn’t an Anglophone flag for Quebec, though Redditors and others are working on it, and Montreal’s flag features a St George’s Cross.
No flag for English-speakers, but Russia has a flag for Ingush-speakers, neighbors and relatives of the Chechens. It has a kind of circling-the-drain vibe to it:
In general flags are far less of a deal in Canada than the US. You very rarely see a private home flying a Canadian flag and the provincial flags are obscure in general.
https://i.postimg.cc/NMcW6M80/51b14292-38b6-4a71-8e6a-4cec7febe24c.png
https://wudumate.com/articles/what-are-the-steps-of-wudu-and-why-is-it-performed
Chechens are not Turkic. They are simply Caucasus natives who converted to Islam centuries ago. Not that different from Georgians and Abkhazians who remained Christian.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franco-Columbian
Every province and territory has its own version, except Quebec. They don't need one. The best are those of NWT and Nunavut. There are fewer than 600 Francophones in the latter, but they have their own flag!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Canadian_flags#Francophone_peoples
https://flagmartcanada.com/collections/francophone-flags-of-canada
https://quebeccultureblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/cd-fr-flg1.jpg?w=584&h=425
I'm willing to bet there isn't an Anglophone flag for Quebec, though Redditors and others are working on it, and Montreal's flag features a St George's Cross.
No flag for English-speakers, but Russia has a flag for Ingush-speakers, neighbors and relatives of the Chechens. It has a kind of circling-the-drain vibe to it:
https://www.shutterstock.com/image-vector/ingushetia-flag-waving-background-vector-260nw-2391364557.jpgReplies: @Cagey Beast, @Frau Katze, @J.Ross
Anglo-American liberalism cannot make sense of a situation in which its not top dog. Understand that and so many things become clear.
Some people – quite a lot actually – have no sense of humour.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/article/2024/jul/28/eurosport-drop-olympics-commentator-bob-ballard-for-sexist-remark-about-swimmers
When the winning Aussie 4x100m swim team were late appearing after their win:
Paper of Record:
Ms Agarwal is “Visiting Professor of Social Inequities and Injustice” at Loughborough University, which is very sports-centred.
https://www.lboro.ac.uk/schools/social-sciences-humanities/team/pragya-agarwal/
It's been over a century since the US has had a hostile neighbor on its border, and a century and half since the US had a hostile neighbor of any strength, so Americans today have amnesia about what to do in such a situation. The choices are: exterminate, control, or absorb. In the 1860s the US chose all three of those, which dubious decision is still lauded as an admirable part of US history. Today, after doing a certain amount of the first, Russia is now more humanely choosing the second and third.Replies: @Nico, @Torna atrás
Americans are good people, during WWII a Japanese Kamikaze hit the USS Missouri and his body landed on deck. Though an unpopular decision, the Captain demanded a proper burial for the Japanese soldier. He explained to his crew that: after death, he is no longer your enemy, and the crew hand stitched a Japanese flag.
It's an outrage that our government is spending huge sums of our tax money in Ukraine and involving us in war risks we don't need to be taking. Americans should not be supporting the liberation of Ukraine from totalitarian Russia or the defense of Russia from aggressive NATO or whatever you want to call it or whatever side you are on. We don't belong there at all.
We already have a serious threat to our security and prosperity in this country; it is coming from our treasonous leaders. Open borders, DEI, and the loss of our constitutional liberties are the threat. Every word you write about Ukraine, every dollar we spend there, is a stupid diversion from where our attention should be.
I don't care if baddie Putin defeats goodie Zelensky, or if goodie Zelensky defeats baddie Putin. Same for the Middle East. I don't care whether the winner is the nasty Israelis or the nasty Palestinians.
US out of NATO. US out of the Middle East. Put our troops to work deporting illegals. The war that matters is here, not over there.Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @HA, @Jack D
The trouble is that an awful lot of people who migrate to the West bring the squabbles and hatreds of their homelands with them.
Hence the anti-Russian hatred of some former Soviet Jews or Canadian Banderites, or the anti-Indian hatred of some Canadian Sikhs.
In Bradford, in the 1990 riots (ostensibly against the BNP), Muslims settled scores by burning out Hindu-owned shops.
The point, troll, is that everyone’s assuming the guy is Jewish and no one’s providing any evidence. Burden’s on you to prove that he’s Jewish.
But why prove things when you can assume them. Oh right, because of the old saying about how it makes you an a**.
Seeing as all you low-IQ, antisemitic Unz-trolls are saying it, I’m going to assume it’s false until proven otherwise.
The goal of AI is to find a problem to solve.
Right, the “Moscow Times” is based out of Amsterdam.
We don't all share your obsession, a**hole. Not everything is about your country.Replies: @Reg Cæsar
First time I’ve seen a commenter Disagree with himself. Or herself, zirself, whatever.
Yeah, last night I ridiculed a commentator on the "Grapes of Wrath" thread who slapped an Agree on his own comment, and that was my chance to do him one better.
Republics, not ethnic, should be in scare quotes. These have their own flags. The cities and oblasts have better ones:
Can you top a defecating mammoth?
Like Perot and not Nader.
https://www.tmz.com/2024/07/26/rfk-jr-taking-more-votes-from-donald-trump-over-kamala-harris/Replies: @Reg Cæsar
He also posts some poll showing he’d beat Trump 57%-43% in a two-way race. There’s not gonna be a two-way race, unless someone dies at the last minute. (That happened in 1912 with the incumbent Vice President.)
That the Biden Administration (it’s still the Biden Administration) has been stingy with Secret Service protection suggests they don’t believe him. Were Kennedy draining Trump’s support, he’d be safer than the Pope.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franco-Columbian
Every province and territory has its own version, except Quebec. They don't need one. The best are those of NWT and Nunavut. There are fewer than 600 Francophones in the latter, but they have their own flag!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Canadian_flags#Francophone_peoples
https://flagmartcanada.com/collections/francophone-flags-of-canada
https://quebeccultureblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/cd-fr-flg1.jpg?w=584&h=425
I'm willing to bet there isn't an Anglophone flag for Quebec, though Redditors and others are working on it, and Montreal's flag features a St George's Cross.
No flag for English-speakers, but Russia has a flag for Ingush-speakers, neighbors and relatives of the Chechens. It has a kind of circling-the-drain vibe to it:
https://www.shutterstock.com/image-vector/ingushetia-flag-waving-background-vector-260nw-2391364557.jpgReplies: @Cagey Beast, @Frau Katze, @J.Ross
Interesting about those flags. However the fact that I was unaware they existed suggests they’re pretty obscure.
In general flags are far less of a deal in Canada than the US. You very rarely see a private home flying a Canadian flag and the provincial flags are obscure in general.
There is a Turkic ethnicity in Chechnya:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kumyks
One guy became a champion in Chinese UFC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Salikhov
He was billed by Chinese promoters as “Putin’s bodyguard” although that may just be hot air
Ryōji Uehara was a flight captain of the Imperial Japanese Army and was killed in action as a kamikaze pilot.
He wrote something most Japanese are familiar with. Perhaps you have also read it?
The Last Letter
I feel deeply honoured and privileged to have been chosen to become a member of the Army’s “Special Assault Unit,” which embodies the glory of Japan. Having read logic and philosophy through my somewhat extended student life, I am sure that, based upon the idea of reason, triumph of liberty is inevitable to me, although I might sound like a liberalist. As stated by Croce in Italy, it is a universal truth that it is absolutely impossible to exterminate freedom, which is a fundamental human nature, and it will eventually win even though it seems to be temporarily oppressed.
It is a clear fact that authoritarian and totalitarian regimes may sporadically prosper, but they ultimately will perish. We can see the truth of that in the Axis governments. As manifested by the defeat of Italy under Fascism, not to mention Germany under Nazism, authoritarian governments are disappearing one after the other, crumbling like buildings without a foundation.
I believe that the universality of truth will eternally and permanently prove the greatness of liberty as is now being verified by reality and just as history has shown in the past. I will be more than delighted to find that my belief has been proven right even though that turns out to be a disaster for our nation. The current struggle, whatever it is, stems from ideology; and the result of a struggle can readily be predicted by the belief systems upon which the struggle is fought.
The ambition of making my beloved Japan become as mighty an empire as Great Britain has faded away. If the leading positions in Japan had been held by those who truly love Japan, my country would not have been driven into the situation it faces today. I have been dreaming of the Japanese people proud of themselves no matter where one may be in the world.
What a friend of mine once said is true: a pilot of the Special Assault Unit is merely a machine. He just steers the apparatus. He is only a molecule within a magnet that sticks fast to an enemy aircraft carrier, possessing neither personality nor emotions.
If one thinks about it rationally, this act is incomprehensible and, to try to put it in a plain expression, these pilots are, as they say, simply suicidal. Since I am nothing more than a machine, I have no right to put my case forward. However, I only wish that the Japan that I dearly love will someday be made truly great by my fellow citizens.
In such an emotional state, my death may probably lead to nothing. Nonetheless, as I stated at the outset, I feel very honoured to have been chosen to be a member of the Special Assault Unit. It is true that, once inside an aircraft, I am mere hardware, but once disembarked, I do have emotions and passion as I am also a human. When the woman for whom I cared so dearly passed away, I emotionally died with her. The idea that she waits for me in Heaven, where we will be reunited, makes death not particularly frightening for me, since it happens only on my way to Heaven.
Tomorrow is the day of the assault. My idea is too highly extreme to be made public, but I just wanted to express the true feelings inside me, so please forgive me for my disoriented thoughts. Another liberalist will depart from this earth tomorrow. Although he may appear forlorn, he is in fact very content.
Once again, please forgive my selfish ranting.
You really don’t understand the Muslim concept of “loyalty”. In Muslim lands, loyalty is always for sale. Kadyrov’s father lead a war AGAINST the Russians and then the Russians made a deal with the family – switch sides and we will let you run this shithole as our vassals. The Russians used the carrot (see above) and the stick (bombing the shit out of them) in order to win the war. If the Kadyrovs switched sides once, it is completely possible for them to switch sides AGAIN overnight if someone offers them a better deal or if Kadyrov calculated that the ruling Russian gang was no longer capable/willing to bomb the shit out of them again.
You also don’t understand shit about the sociological situation in Russia. Muslims like Chechens are the Russian equivalent of Latinos in America. OTOH, they do a lot of the “jobs that Russians don’t want to do” but OTOH they also form the bulk of criminal gangs.
In short, you could not be more wrong. Stick to ranting about stuff that you actually know about because you clearly don’t know shit about Russia and are just doing a “grass is always greener on the other side” analysis. This used to be the province of the American Left who were always talking about how there was no unemployment in Russia or that health care was free or whatever (back when Russia was “Communist”). If you look at the world thru ideologically colored glasses then the other side is going to look like a paradise.
It's an outrage that our government is spending huge sums of our tax money in Ukraine and involving us in war risks we don't need to be taking. Americans should not be supporting the liberation of Ukraine from totalitarian Russia or the defense of Russia from aggressive NATO or whatever you want to call it or whatever side you are on. We don't belong there at all.
We already have a serious threat to our security and prosperity in this country; it is coming from our treasonous leaders. Open borders, DEI, and the loss of our constitutional liberties are the threat. Every word you write about Ukraine, every dollar we spend there, is a stupid diversion from where our attention should be.
I don't care if baddie Putin defeats goodie Zelensky, or if goodie Zelensky defeats baddie Putin. Same for the Middle East. I don't care whether the winner is the nasty Israelis or the nasty Palestinians.
US out of NATO. US out of the Middle East. Put our troops to work deporting illegals. The war that matters is here, not over there.Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @HA, @Jack D
“Every word you write about Ukraine, every dollar we spend there, is a stupid diversion from where our attention should be. I don’t care if baddie Putin defeats goodie Zelensky,”
Save it, fanboy. You’re evidently too dishonest to admit it, but your pretense at nonchalance convinces no one who’s paying attention. In fact, you desperately want Putin to win so you can pwn the libs or the neo-cons or the drag queens, or simply because you’re sick of the West and would happily let it burn. Sellout, or fellow traveler, or merely a useful idiot. Or else, an outright traitor (or in your case, a “rebel” enthusiast). Same difference.
How do I know you’re just minor variations of those? Because time and again, you and your ilk hijack thread after thread to alert us of the goings on in Russia, and what a wonderful fellow Putin is, and how swell this war is going for him. Do I know or care about pro-Putin blogger Simplicius? Of course not — why should I? Why should anyone? And yet, time and again, I am alerted to his latest offering on Substack and his analyses of Putin’s genius and how Ukraine is merely weeks away from collapsing (as we’ve been told every couple of weeks for about two and a half years now). And that’s just one example of how fanboys intrude their OT obsessions on matters related to Russia. There are countless others. They wouldn’t do all that feverish Russia-boosting if they simply didn’t care who won over there, and they certainly wouldn’t only be complaining about the ones who push back against the relentless propaganda.
So try and be a little more convincing next time. Or else, push back against those who derail threads in Russia’s direction in the first place, and then you won’t have to put up with the likes of those like me who question the lies being spewed.
“First time I’ve seen a commenter Disagree with himself.”
Yeah, last night I ridiculed a commentator on the “Grapes of Wrath” thread who slapped an Agree on his own comment, and that was my chance to do him one better.
Kumyks arrived during the early Middle Ages in the area. Chechens were there since the neolithic.
I almost never post on Russia and when I do it’s only to say “none of our business”. The only other time I’ve responded to you concerned the hysterical tone of your rhetoric. On that thread you admitted you are a woman, which explains your drama queen emotional style.
Like I said -- the distinction between outright stooge and useful idiot is at this point immaterial.
"On that thread you admitted you are a woman,..."
I've neither admitted (nor denied) any such thing. Evidently, my gender is a matter of considerable (and rather creepy) fascination for you, but you really ought to try and keep it to yourself. It says far more about you than me at this point.Replies: @Reg Cæsar
All our efforts now have to be centered on that Moldova has to retain its autonomy. Where do I sign my tax dollars to pay off Moldovan politicians so they have a spine? I mean if Putin controls Moldova he controls the world supply of...whatever Moldova supplies...which is (I have to look it up but I'm sure it's extremely important).
I sure I speak for a lot of people who feel the West now has to print more money which we don't really have to ensure Moldova is Moldova, united and inseparable because like well...because.
I, however, have a minor tactical quibble-we have to prioritize something so what do think? Should we pour more money which we don't have into Moldova or Quemoy and Matsu? Remember those two beacons of democracy were really important in the Kennedy-Nixon debates and then they were forgotten because really nobody gives f.... except Unz trolls and they moved onto crying over Belarus and Moldova.
Moldova or Quemoy and Matsu, choices, choices who said geopolitics was ever easy!Replies: @John Johnson
Oh my God! Belarus will lose its autonomy!…and Moldova is next! Moldova! Moldova! John, I admit I thought you were quite the fool but now I understand now where you are coming from
So I’m a fool for supporting countries whose majorities don’t want to be under a totalitarian empire? That’s amusing coming from the guy who thinks frontline telegram videos from Russian soldiers must all be propaganda because the 2.5 week special operation is going so well. There was recently a video of Putin trying to use a motorcycle attack squadron to take a small village which suggests that shortages are real. But the videos of Russians complaining about shortages……those must be fake. Boy will you be embarrassed when this war is over as it will come out that Putin was not playing 5d chess with motorcycles and T-54s.
Unlike you and the left I support the ability of free men to question their governments.
I sure I speak for a lot of people who feel the West now has to print more money which we don’t really have to ensure Moldova is Moldova, united and inseparable because like well…because.
We don’t have to print money. We could stop funding Israel and the profits from increased LNG exports to Europe would cover military aid to countries like Ukraine and Moldova that do not want to be ruled by a totalitarian dwarf.
Funny how all these conservatives that complain about funding Ukraine have NOTHING to say about military aid to a middle class country that already has a modern military. Israel did not ask for military aid and yet our “fiscal conservatives” lined right up to fund them will billions. Speaker Johnson in fact would not hold a vote on Ukraine aid but was willing to send 9 billion to Israel. In fact that was the only aid he was willing to allow for 8 months.
Care to give us the list of what you believed and why you shouldn't believe them?
Not openly.
"with an obnoxious loudspeaker"
Talk to the State Superintendent of Education in Oklahoma.
"strange bathroom rules"
You mean like non-gender restrooms?
"bans on pork, alcohol, dogs, being clean shaven"
Christians have their own prohibitions.
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/List_of_actions_prohibited_by_the_Bible#Food_and_drink
"and most European art".
Citations, please.Replies: @John Johnson, @BB753
Not openly.
There is not a single conservative that advocates daily prayers forced by the government that must be followed at work.
Just stop already.
You mean like non-gender restrooms?
That doesn’t make any sense. Conservatives aren’t pushing non-gender restrooms. That would be the left.
Christians have their own prohibitions.
You’re citing the Old Testament which has laws for Jews that Christians are not required to follow. I take it you did not grow up as Christian and this all seems the same to you? The piece you are missing here is the New Covenant.
Citations, please.
Citations? You think I am making up a Muslim rule? Why didn’t you just Google it?
They can’t draw living things which means most European art is Haram. Their interest in geometric art is related to this rule.
Here you go:
The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) stated that whose who make images – by drawing or engraving – will be punished on the Day of Resurrection, and these prohibited images are images of animate beings , such as humans, animals and birds, based on the fact that in the Hadith it says that they will be told: “Bring to life that which you have created.”
You moved the goalposts. You originally stated "Conservative Americans do not support forced daily prayers".
https://www.thedailybeast.com/conservatives-will-use-the-fight-over-prayer-in-schools-to-attack-diversity
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/07/supreme-court-religion-schools-prayer-kennedy-carson/661365/
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/ryan-walters-oklahoma-schools-superintendent-tulsa-rcna101235
https://pres-outlook.org/2024/07/bills-to-enhance-religion-in-schools-spur-fights-between-faiths/
"You’re citing the Old Testament which has laws for Jews that Christians are not required to follow."
In light of Jesus' teaching, he considered the entire Old Testament to be the inerrant, written Word of God. Jesus said he came to fulfill the entire Jewish Old Testament (Matt. 5:17), which he referred to as “the Law and the Prophets” (Matt. 5:17; Luke 24:26–27).
"You think I am making up a Muslim rule? Why didn’t you just Google it?"
It's very complex.
https://aboutislamver2.aboutislam.net/counseling/ask-about-islam/artistic-things-forbidden-islam/
--Thus, the above-mentioned arts are generally permissible unless they cause an evil similar to one of the evils mentioned in the narrations/scripts above. Given all the above, we learn that Islam is not against any kind of arts in principle, as long as it does not violate its fixed and well-known moral stands.--Replies: @John Johnson
I thought the clip was cute, dunno why Old Prude hit me with the troll tag. Was the DJ’s outfit too revealing??
“There is not a single conservative that advocates daily prayers forced by the government that must be followed at work. Just stop already.”
You moved the goalposts. You originally stated “Conservative Americans do not support forced daily prayers”.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/conservatives-will-use-the-fight-over-prayer-in-schools-to-attack-diversity
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/07/supreme-court-religion-schools-prayer-kennedy-carson/661365/
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/ryan-walters-oklahoma-schools-superintendent-tulsa-rcna101235
https://pres-outlook.org/2024/07/bills-to-enhance-religion-in-schools-spur-fights-between-faiths/
“You’re citing the Old Testament which has laws for Jews that Christians are not required to follow.”
In light of Jesus’ teaching, he considered the entire Old Testament to be the inerrant, written Word of God. Jesus said he came to fulfill the entire Jewish Old Testament (Matt. 5:17), which he referred to as “the Law and the Prophets” (Matt. 5:17; Luke 24:26–27).
“You think I am making up a Muslim rule? Why didn’t you just Google it?”
It’s very complex.
https://aboutislamver2.aboutislam.net/counseling/ask-about-islam/artistic-things-forbidden-islam/
–Thus, the above-mentioned arts are generally permissible unless they cause an evil similar to one of the evils mentioned in the narrations/scripts above. Given all the above, we learn that Islam is not against any kind of arts in principle, as long as it does not violate its fixed and well-known moral stands.–
https://aboutislamver2.aboutislam.net/counseling/ask-about-islam/artistic-things-forbidden-islam/Thus, the above-mentioned arts are generally permissible unless they cause an evil similar to one of the evils mentioned in the narrations/scripts above. So you learned about their rule on drawing living things TODAY and you are trying to correct me on it? You cited a blog but he doesn't deny they are banned and tries to give some middle ground response. Here it is from IslamQA:One is drawing pictures of animate beings . It says in the Sunnah that this is forbidden.
https://islamqa.info/en/answers/39806/ruling-on-drawing-animate-beingsMost European art contains a living being. Thus most European art is Haram. It's quite clear and shows that this religion is not compatible with Western society. You are clearly some White guy in the burbs that hasn't been around Muslims and is unaware that they take this rule seriously. Dogs indoors and art containing living things are offensive to them. Muhammed in fact said very clearly that image makers go to hell:
https://islamweb.net/en/fatwa/84617/explanation-of-hadith-about-picturesHere is a Muslim home decorating guide and have a look at the first rule:
The first rule that every Muslim considers when decorating a Muslim home is not to include any figurative objects in the design plan. This means, no art with human or animal shapes as well as no free-standing statues or animal figures in furniture or accessories.
https://mustansarjavaid.medium.com/islamic-perspective-of-home-decoration-things-dos-donts-b4d15143aedfThe Mona Lisa is Haram. So is practically all Roman art and Muslim raiders in fact destroyed most of the Persian art when they violently turned it into Iran. Maybe actually read about this 7th century religion before trying to lecture someone else on it.Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @J.Ross, @Corvinus
https://www.unz.com/isteve/theyre-not-making-aryan-charles-lindberg-types-the-way-they-used-to/#comment-6271905 (#9)
No man is free until every man is forced to subsidize a satanic, sodomite spectacle.
The police have given the Southport stabber‘s age as 17. Does this mean they will not be giving us his name? The kid wore a hood, so we won’t have descriptions from witnesses. We may never know who he is– unless he turns out to be a Farage supporter. Then we’ll never hear the end of it.
This was a yoga class for prepubescent girls, with a Swiftian theme. (Taylor, not Jonathan.) Who would be offended by that? Okay, some of us might, but not to a homicidal degree.
So far the police have said it isn't terror related. He's originally from Cardiff in Wales, which does have a significant Muslim population, but lived with his family in a small village outside Southport, which doesn't seem to be something Muslims would do. I'll bet he had some weird sexual motivation.Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
Ryōji Uehara was a flight captain of the Imperial Japanese Army and was killed in action as a kamikaze pilot.
He wrote something most Japanese are familiar with. Perhaps you have also read it?
The Last Letter
I feel deeply honoured and privileged to have been chosen to become a member of the Army’s “Special Assault Unit,” which embodies the glory of Japan. Having read logic and philosophy through my somewhat extended student life, I am sure that, based upon the idea of reason, triumph of liberty is inevitable to me, although I might sound like a liberalist. As stated by Croce in Italy, it is a universal truth that it is absolutely impossible to exterminate freedom, which is a fundamental human nature, and it will eventually win even though it seems to be temporarily oppressed.
It is a clear fact that authoritarian and totalitarian regimes may sporadically prosper, but they ultimately will perish. We can see the truth of that in the Axis governments. As manifested by the defeat of Italy under Fascism, not to mention Germany under Nazism, authoritarian governments are disappearing one after the other, crumbling like buildings without a foundation.
I believe that the universality of truth will eternally and permanently prove the greatness of liberty as is now being verified by reality and just as history has shown in the past. I will be more than delighted to find that my belief has been proven right even though that turns out to be a disaster for our nation. The current struggle, whatever it is, stems from ideology; and the result of a struggle can readily be predicted by the belief systems upon which the struggle is fought.
The ambition of making my beloved Japan become as mighty an empire as Great Britain has faded away. If the leading positions in Japan had been held by those who truly love Japan, my country would not have been driven into the situation it faces today. I have been dreaming of the Japanese people proud of themselves no matter where one may be in the world.
What a friend of mine once said is true: a pilot of the Special Assault Unit is merely a machine. He just steers the apparatus. He is only a molecule within a magnet that sticks fast to an enemy aircraft carrier, possessing neither personality nor emotions.
If one thinks about it rationally, this act is incomprehensible and, to try to put it in a plain expression, these pilots are, as they say, simply suicidal. Since I am nothing more than a machine, I have no right to put my case forward. However, I only wish that the Japan that I dearly love will someday be made truly great by my fellow citizens.
In such an emotional state, my death may probably lead to nothing. Nonetheless, as I stated at the outset, I feel very honoured to have been chosen to be a member of the Special Assault Unit. It is true that, once inside an aircraft, I am mere hardware, but once disembarked, I do have emotions and passion as I am also a human. When the woman for whom I cared so dearly passed away, I emotionally died with her. The idea that she waits for me in Heaven, where we will be reunited, makes death not particularly frightening for me, since it happens only on my way to Heaven.
Tomorrow is the day of the assault. My idea is too highly extreme to be made public, but I just wanted to express the true feelings inside me, so please forgive me for my disoriented thoughts. Another liberalist will depart from this earth tomorrow. Although he may appear forlorn, he is in fact very content.
Once again, please forgive my selfish ranting.
It sounds better at 118 Miles Per Hour (190 Kilometers Per Hour) in a BMW on a European highway.
It is apity that translation of the video speech cannot be done automatically. One of the best videos, unlike ramblings of Mearsheimer & comp., was the interview of a Croatian nuclear physicist some two weeks ago.
He patiently enumerated all treasons of the West (Budapest etc.), but also added:
* Russian side has so far threatened with the use of nukes 35 times, while the West- zero
* there is a zero possibility of Russia’s use of tactical nuclear weapons due o the complexity & incompetence on the Russian side
* if pushed to the wall, Ukraine will use dirty radioactive Cesium bombs via drones, which will make the whole of European Russia uninhabitable in the next 300 years. So, if you want to sell us- we’ll destroy the Russia (and probably the planet)- but you asked for it. We have the means & we’ll not hesitate if you want to sell us into slavery.
* Russia’s daily loss is about 900 men, which is close to 1000 in WW1, which led to the revolution. Ukrainian losses are three times smaller- Russia doesn’t use the rotation of troops. When they send you to war, you are there until dead or heavily wounded.
As regards the Crimea- it’s almost over (Google tran):
Putin is on the verge of losing his ‘Holy Land’: Will NATO now dare to cross the ‘red line’?
If Crimea is cut off and its army, as well as the remaining civilians, are starved, what effect will that have on the entire war? Losing Sevastopol is one thing, but can Putin politically and strategically handle the loss of Crimea, his “holy land”?
Last week, the last remaining warship – a Project 1135-class patrol frigate – quietly set sail from the port of Sevastopol, which has been the main base of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet since 2014. Ukrainian Navy spokesman Dmytro Pletenchuk suggested that “we should remember this day.”
Tom Sharpe, a military commentator for the British Telegraph, suggests that this is a sign that Russian President Vladimir Putin may soon leave Crimea. – I have already warned against too much hope in naval successes in this conflict, but what, in a broader sense, does this shameful withdrawal mean? Operationally speaking, the loss of the port is significant, although it was long expected. But is the scale of this disgrace enough to have a strategic effect? – he states. This is the latest, Sharpe adds, in a long list of humiliations the Black Sea Fleet has suffered since the 2022 invasion.
———————————–
In October of that year, British Minister of Defense James Heappey declared that the Black Sea Fleet was “functionally defeated.” “I thought it was a premature sculpture for two reasons. First, at that point Russian attempts to restrict grain exports through the Bosphorus were still successful. Second, Russia still had operational ships and submarines armed with Kalibr missiles, which can reach the entire Black Sea,” Sharke writes further for the Telegraph.
By December, after a series of attacks and due to the lack of Russian surveillance aircraft, the waters between Odesa and Snake Island became safe enough for merchant ships. Cargo ships could safely sail between Ukrainian ports and the territorial waters of Romania, Bulgaria and Turkey, where the Russians did not dare to intervene. By March of this year, attacks by unmanned surface vessels (USV) significantly weakened the Russian fleet, and a third of the Black Sea Fleet was destroyed. Because of this, the British Ministry of Defense declared the fleet “functionally inactive”.
In May, aerial and surface drones attacked the port of Novorossiysk, the Tuapse refinery and a nearby oil terminal, again demonstrating the weakness of Russia’s defense systems. A few days later, American ATACMS missiles hit the port in Sevastopol, sinking the minesweeper Kurovets and damaging the Karakurt-class corvette. Two attempted attacks on the Kerch road and railway bridge, one with a truck full of explosives and one with unmanned vessels, caused damage, but were not decisive. The bridge is important both tactically and symbolically, so a new attempt to attack it is expected. It is not yet clear whether America has delivered ATACMS missiles with warheads that could effectively destroy the bridge.
Agreed. John Johnson is most likely a non white, non American troll.
the trouble with you, you believe every artificial created propaganda meant to get the US into wars -I listed them-there were 5 and I gave 5 good reasons why you shouldn’t believe them
Care to give us the list of what you believed and why you shouldn’t believe them?
https://s.rfi.fr/media/display/2ce00ae0-13f4-11ea-b676-005056bf7c53/w:1280/p:16x9/a-coup-sf-jolly-pret_0.jpgReplies: @For what it's worth, @kaganovitch, @J.Ross
I guess you don’t know what French people look like.
On the contrary, you and Jack D don't want a variety of sources. I've had to do lots of reading to gain a better perspective on the Russian Federation in general. I can't tell if journalists don't know any of the history of Russia or if they deliberately spout propaganda. The news about Russia is with one voice: NATOs. Journalists aren't doing their job anymore. This is most obvious with coverage of Russia but certainly not limited to that topic. I've had a whole education about Russia and foreign policy since this started and could expand it a bit more. I actually avoid the outright pro-Russian propagandists like Ritter. He is brilliant but isn't informing when he writes about Russia. Most others simply have a foreign policy preference that views Russia in friendly terms if not as an outright ally. People like MacGregor and Mearsheimer view NATO as having expanded into Russia's backyard eliciting a response not unlike ours during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
It is you who refuses to be anything like fair or objective. I, like most who sympathize with Russia, start from the premise that Russia is a friendly country. It is realistic that Russia like Israel or any number of cordial countries will occasionally do things we don't like. This is no reason to end the friendship or to continue Cold War era Containment. The US has a long history of relating to smaller countries by making offers they can't refuse. It is the way things are done no matter how much this gets glossed over with propaganda. The Ukrainian people have not benefited in any way by having NATOs red line drawn in their country. Russia wasn't trying to incorporate Ukraine; the terms for coexisting were clearly laid out in the Minsk agreements. Zelensky and his friends have gotten fantastically rich at the expense of Ukraine and its people. Those postponed elections would have been the end of Zelensky's political career as well as his cash flow. Russia is acting logically to defend itself against NATO encroachment. Putin spent years trying to build a good relationship with NATO and was rewarded with renewed attempts at containment. NATO has no intention of peaceful coexistence; it intends to break up the Russian Federation no doubt to be followed with offers smaller entities like Chechnya can't refuse. Your obfuscation only hides the truth from people who aren't the least bit concerned with learning anything for themselves.
You are obviously military. What I want you to understand is that the US as hegemon is of not benefit to the average American. Putin isn't trying to takeover Eastern Europe. He likely doesn't even have the necessary manpower for such an endeavor. Likewise, China dominating Asia reduced our influence there but doesn't damage the US. We are supposed to be a country with a military mainly used to defend our homeland not a military with a country. If I ever get the word out that all this hullabaloo is about a US empire rather than a free world, things will change rather
quickly. The citizens of this country are being forced to embrace NATO political values that, among other things, exert tight secular control over religion; they're also being marginalized on behalf of a potentially endless supply of immigrants; these immigrants are treated like the victims of those they are displacing and replacing so are given preferential treatment in all matters. The US and NATO currently need to strengthen its relationship with India so the UK and Ireland have had Indian prime ministers while the US has VP Kamala Harris now running for president; that Ramaswampy and Haley were both in the Republican primary debates while no Hispanic candidates we're there to represent an emerging majority ethnicity is very telling.
You keep insisting that those of us who take Russia's side in the proxy war being fought in the Ukraine are naive. The truth is we know that NATO expansion with the continuation of Cold War containment and the new effort to contain China are inextricably linked to unconstitutional policies and mass immigration that harms American citizens. We are the ones being shoved aside so the US and NATO can try to rule the world. The narrative is that evil dictators will sprout like mushrooms if we don't play world police; the truth is that foreign governments have to earn the consent of the governed in order to survive. It's just that people from other cultures tend to value economic efficacy over free speech and are generally more conformist than Westerners. Their governments will be more authoritarian just like their cultures. Odd seeing France display the weakest argument imaginable for free speech with a gay Jew setting up an irreverent reenactment of the Last Supper. No one outside the Western world will be convinced that our civilization is superior by this mockery of what us sacred to Christians. Even many Westerners are losing faith in their own governments because the leadership exhibits such poor judgment. It's one thing to allow freedom of thought, quite another to condone public displays of sacrilege and debauchery. The NATO values being forced on the US are decadent European values, not American. We are a dying civilization that views religion as more of a threat than decadence. We need to liberate ourselves from leaders who are dragging us to ruin not try to police the world.Replies: @notbe mk 2, @HA, @John Johnson, @Mark G., @J.Ross
The best writer on the Ukraine situation is Simplicius.
These are authentically deranged & morally corrupt individuals. I don’t think they’re even paid.
“Like all the other overextended empires of the past, we will be entering a future era of contraction.”
As Herb Stein said: “Something too good to last, won’t.”
But this collapse has been predicted for the last half century.
And…
Some intern copied the facing page in the anthology by mistake.
Playing “God Save the Queen” for the US wouldn’t even be much of an error, as the tune is also an anthem for us, albeit “unofficial”. Both that and the “official” one set American words to a British tune.
That they play the top Google hit for “Hong Kong’s anthem” rather than the CCP dirge is downright delicious.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQli9RIkEX8
is similar, but much more beautiful. And not at all threatening, unlike a few hundred Chechens dancing in trance.Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
The Ghost Dance was threatening. I read semi-fictional Black Elk’s memoir & as he describes it, it is exactly the same as the Chechen dance (plus the delusion about invulnerability to bullets). During the dance Black Elk passed out and “saw” his deceased parents in a spiritual world.
Some 20 years ago I participated twice in such dances (some of my friends were Sufis), but without result. Some guys attained spiritual ecstasy, but me- nothing. I guess I am too rational …
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkuimX1bh6gReplies: @Bardon Kaldian
Listen, one thing is clear here: Steve Sealer has moved his professional emphasis over to Substack.
Good for him.
I donated many hundred dollar bills and friendly cards and letters to him, happily, when I thought he was a legitimate part of UNZ.com That was all good.
Now, why waste our time here, where he lingers and humors his remaining readers, for some reason?
To oversimplify, he lost many of us because of three subjects:
1) Covid
2) Ukraine
3) Gaza
For a man who takes for himself the mantle of “Noticing,” he surely has failed to Notice in those three cases!
Thus, some of us have had enough. Some of us now even suspect him! Yes, we are indeed suspicious, because either Steve Sailer is too stupid to Notice, or he is disingenuous.
Which is it, Steve?!
(Frankly, I don’t expect an answer.) Go well, you pathetic SOB.
Prove me wrong.
Again: Prove me wrong!
I wasn’t following him during Covid. What did he do wrong?
It is lucrative on a per hour basis. But to not see the true purpose of this website by now is funny.
Thanks,
- Mordecai Velvel Rabinowitz
Chechnya is on the way from Moscow to the Caucus oil fields. No way are they going to give it up.
Would you want America to cede Texas as its population becomes less white?
Playing "God Save the Queen" for the US wouldn't even be much of an error, as the tune is also an anthem for us, albeit "unofficial". Both that and the "official" one set American words to a British tune.
That they play the top Google hit for "Hong Kong's anthem" rather than the CCP dirge is downright delicious.Replies: @notbe mk 2, @prosa123
that’s why a real professional has to check every intern’s work (but in the real world no-one does).
Good for him.
I donated many hundred dollar bills and friendly cards and letters to him, happily, when I thought he was a legitimate part of UNZ.com That was all good.
Now, why waste our time here, where he lingers and humors his remaining readers, for some reason?
To oversimplify, he lost many of us because of three subjects:
1) Covid
2) Ukraine
3) Gaza
For a man who takes for himself the mantle of "Noticing," he surely has failed to Notice in those three cases!
Thus, some of us have had enough. Some of us now even suspect him! Yes, we are indeed suspicious, because either Steve Sailer is too stupid to Notice, or he is disingenuous.
Which is it, Steve?!
(Frankly, I don't expect an answer.) Go well, you pathetic SOB.
Prove me wrong.
Again: Prove me wrong!Replies: @Frau Katze, @Jack D, @Thomm
Has Steve ever written about Ukraine? I’m pretty sure not. Gaza? If he has, very little.
I wasn’t following him during Covid. What did he do wrong?
It's an outrage that our government is spending huge sums of our tax money in Ukraine and involving us in war risks we don't need to be taking. Americans should not be supporting the liberation of Ukraine from totalitarian Russia or the defense of Russia from aggressive NATO or whatever you want to call it or whatever side you are on. We don't belong there at all.
We already have a serious threat to our security and prosperity in this country; it is coming from our treasonous leaders. Open borders, DEI, and the loss of our constitutional liberties are the threat. Every word you write about Ukraine, every dollar we spend there, is a stupid diversion from where our attention should be.
I don't care if baddie Putin defeats goodie Zelensky, or if goodie Zelensky defeats baddie Putin. Same for the Middle East. I don't care whether the winner is the nasty Israelis or the nasty Palestinians.
US out of NATO. US out of the Middle East. Put our troops to work deporting illegals. The war that matters is here, not over there.Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @HA, @Jack D
This is not a fact but a conclusion that you have made with which many people disagree. You are putting the cart before the horse by taking “Russia is no threat to us” as the starting point of your argument.
Methinks you doth protest too much. If you really didn’t care you wouldn’t spend all that time defending Putin.
Anyway, the idea that in the age of ICBMs what happens in Europe is none of our business is laughable. The ship sailed on isolationism a century ago and it is never returning to port.
Would you say that the struggle between Russia and Ukraine is a “quarrel in a far-away country between people of whom we know nothing”? Some idiot tried that line once and history proved that he could not have been more wrong.
https://encyc.org/wiki/Chamberlain’s_Radio_Broadcast,_September_27,_1938
Maybe back then such ignorance could be forgiven but now, after all that we have seen?
* doesn't mean to say I'd like to live in Russia, Ukraine or Chechnya - I'm a Brit and they're my people.Replies: @AnotherDad
You’re right, I’m way more knowledgeable–and care way, way, way more about–the situation in the US that I can see with my own eyes.
But the “word” I’m taking on Putin is …. Putin’s!–his words and his actions. This is a guy who blabbers on about Bessarabia and how the breakup of the Soviet Union was a tragedy. There’s only one way a serious person can interpret all that. It’s that Putin is a guy who thinks that the Russian Empire was a good thing and Russia just ought–by some sort of historical cultural wonderfulness–to be dominant culturally and politically across a vast stretch of territory full of people who are not Russian and do not want to be dominated.
And not just words, Putin fought a war–and leveled Grozny to keep Chechnya *in* Russia–an action which has not just zero, but tangible negative benefit to the actual Russian people. It would be like the US leveling San Juan during some Puerto Rican uprising for independence. Which might excite deep state imperialist types, but would have ordinary Americans going “Huh? This is stupid!” And Puerto Ricans even as mixed as they are are actually less trouble and threat (TFR 1.0) than the Chechens (2.7) are to Russia.
No Putin’s ideology should have died a well deserved death after 1914–when the Russians and Austrians dragged the rest of Europe into the Great War. The whole history of the 20th century is one of imperially induced slaughter–rising Germany and Japan chafing at the existing imperial world order of the British and French and to a lesser extent Dutch and American empires and looking to build grand ones of their own. Then further conflicts as some empires–particularly the French–refused to let go. And the Russian Empire–reinvigorated by victory in the War–dominating and oppressing Eastern Europe and the Americans and Russians fighting proxy wars all over.
No, I don’t need any guidance from our own deep state goons on Putin. I’ve got no use for Putin, or his imperialism–straight up. I don’t swoon over the guy because he’s better on queers/globohomo than our goons. Nor because he’s in conflict with our deep state goons. And when a bunch of commenters here babble about “used to be Russian” or “historically part of Russia” (i.e. the Russian Empire) that only reinforces my point. It’s a better world if the Hungarians, Czechs, Poles, Romanians, Latvians, Estonians, Finns, Georgians, Armenians, Azeris … and yes even the Ukrainians and Chechens are not bossed around by Russians. (And the Russians had a leader focused on stopping the muslim immivasion and affordable family formation for Russians.) The one thing everyone sentient ought to be able to agree on after the last century is the right of various peoples to have their own nations and *not* be bossed around by other peoples.
Heck, I wish we normie Americans could get that–out from under the bossy parasitic immivasion loving goons–here in the USA.
But... there are a few problems, especially in the case of Ukraine
a) the United States foreign policy establishment, as announced by Paul Wolfovitz and in "The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives " (1997) by Zbigniew Brzezinski, have made it a major priority that Ukraine must not be friendly to Russia.
Now I don't know what you think, but a study of post-WW2 history tells me that when the US makes something a major priority, they don't pray a lot that it comes about - they do things to bring it about. Looking through my comments I must have quoted Brzezinski to you a dozen times, but it seems not to have had any effect.
Your idealism might be practicable - IF the CIA, MI6 and US Special Forces didn't exist - but they very much do. Do you think the 2014 Maidan "just happened"?
b) Ukraine, like today's US and today's UK, is a multiethnic state, and one of its ethnicities is Russian. You know, the people who rebelled against the 2014 coup. Don't they count?
c) moving south, there's a very good reason (apart from geography, Chechnya is situated between Russia and Iran) why Russia needs Chechnya inside the tent. The Chechens, like the Afghans, are a rough bunch and good scrappers, but not what we'd call gentlemen in a scrap.
"When you're wounded and left on Afghanistan's plains
And the women come out to cut up what remains
Just roll to your rifle and blow out your brains
And go to your God like a soldier"
Russia have already had one very nasty scrap with the Chechens - the idea that the US would leave them alone is the acme of gullibility. They'd soon be in another scrap, where the Chechens had US weapons and satellite intelligence.Replies: @HA
Good for him.
I donated many hundred dollar bills and friendly cards and letters to him, happily, when I thought he was a legitimate part of UNZ.com That was all good.
Now, why waste our time here, where he lingers and humors his remaining readers, for some reason?
To oversimplify, he lost many of us because of three subjects:
1) Covid
2) Ukraine
3) Gaza
For a man who takes for himself the mantle of "Noticing," he surely has failed to Notice in those three cases!
Thus, some of us have had enough. Some of us now even suspect him! Yes, we are indeed suspicious, because either Steve Sailer is too stupid to Notice, or he is disingenuous.
Which is it, Steve?!
(Frankly, I don't expect an answer.) Go well, you pathetic SOB.
Prove me wrong.
Again: Prove me wrong!Replies: @Frau Katze, @Jack D, @Thomm
What part of Unz.com is legitimate? Most of the other commentators are raving lunatic antisemites. Not just their readers but the commentators themselves. Steve was like a voice of sanity amid the fruitcakes and the only reason he ended up here is that at the height of the DIE McCarthyite mania he was deplatformed from all “legitimate” sources.
LOL. You’ve got to be joking.
The Chechens are loyal only to their fellow Chechens. Right now their leader has a deal with the Russian boss so they nominally on “team Russia”. But that is just tactical and if not advantageous in the future, it would change on a dime. They have zero loyalty to Russia, but are loyal to their own people–as it should be. For that I give them fair credit.
And, of course, I in no way shape or form want any of them around me.
I’ll take two, in fact, as their particular cult allows for men with sufficient resources who can provide for and pay attention to and care for both well.Replies: @Frau Katze, @J.Ross
I haven’t defended Putin. My complaint with the anti-Putin crowd is that you don’t recognize that arguments to stay out of the conflict because it isn’t in American interests are not the same as being a Putin sycophant.
This is exactly what we should be debating, not whether Putin has a billion-dollar mansion with pole dancers. World hegemony is not good for us. Stepping back from that is not isolationism. Germany and France and England can worry about Russia. Germany and France and England can give Ukraine weapons if they want. Russian and Chinese ICBMs doesn’t mean we have to destabilize or fight Russia or China in endless border wars. We have our own nukes to dissuade them. Every decision to stay out of a war isn’t 1939 all over again. Washington was right – stay out of entangling foreign alliances.
But the "word" I'm taking on Putin is .... Putin's!--his words and his actions. This is a guy who blabbers on about Bessarabia and how the breakup of the Soviet Union was a tragedy. There's only one way a serious person can interpret all that. It's that Putin is a guy who thinks that the Russian Empire was a good thing and Russia just ought--by some sort of historical cultural wonderfulness--to be dominant culturally and politically across a vast stretch of territory full of people who are not Russian and do not want to be dominated.
And not just words, Putin fought a war--and leveled Grozny to keep Chechnya *in* Russia--an action which has not just zero, but tangible negative benefit to the actual Russian people. It would be like the US leveling San Juan during some Puerto Rican uprising for independence. Which might excite deep state imperialist types, but would have ordinary Americans going "Huh? This is stupid!" And Puerto Ricans even as mixed as they are are actually less trouble and threat (TFR 1.0) than the Chechens (2.7) are to Russia.
No Putin's ideology should have died a well deserved death after 1914--when the Russians and Austrians dragged the rest of Europe into the Great War. The whole history of the 20th century is one of imperially induced slaughter--rising Germany and Japan chafing at the existing imperial world order of the British and French and to a lesser extent Dutch and American empires and looking to build grand ones of their own. Then further conflicts as some empires--particularly the French--refused to let go. And the Russian Empire--reinvigorated by victory in the War--dominating and oppressing Eastern Europe and the Americans and Russians fighting proxy wars all over.
No, I don't need any guidance from our own deep state goons on Putin. I've got no use for Putin, or his imperialism--straight up. I don't swoon over the guy because he's better on queers/globohomo than our goons. Nor because he's in conflict with our deep state goons. And when a bunch of commenters here babble about "used to be Russian" or "historically part of Russia" (i.e. the Russian Empire) that only reinforces my point. It's a better world if the Hungarians, Czechs, Poles, Romanians, Latvians, Estonians, Finns, Georgians, Armenians, Azeris ... and yes even the Ukrainians and Chechens are not bossed around by Russians. (And the Russians had a leader focused on stopping the muslim immivasion and affordable family formation for Russians.) The one thing everyone sentient ought to be able to agree on after the last century is the right of various peoples to have their own nations and *not* be bossed around by other peoples.
Heck, I wish we normie Americans could get that--out from under the bossy parasitic immivasion loving goons--here in the USA.Replies: @Jack D, @YetAnotherAnon, @RadicalCenter
I generally agree with you that Putin is bad news but the question of which “nationalities” deserve their own nation state is not as simple as it seems. Nationality/ethnicity is very much a modern and artificial construct and not one laid down by the gods. There were many area of Europe that were quite multiethnic, even completely putting aside the Jews. You had areas where there would a Hungarian village and then the next village over was a Romanian speaking village and then a German speaking village, etc. Many of the “languages” were not event thought of as such. The languages themselves existed on a continuum so you could not say where Serbian ended and Macedonian or Bulgarian began. The Wilsonian idea of “self determination” and the artificial border drawing exercises created more problems than it solved. Having a border every few dozen miles is not good for the economy. If you make the political division too small, you have trouble attracting top quality talent and the government ends up in the hands of local hacks. The idea that “well these people are corrupt hacks but at least they are Montenegran hacks” doesn’t really work. It’s not unlike the idea of an optimal size for a corporation. You want it to be big enough to have economies of scale but not so big that it is ungovernable.
That being said, Ukraine is a place with enough of its own identity that they have made it clear that they don’t want to be governed by Russia. Are there some areas that might have voted to join Russia in a free and fair referendum? Probably, but that’s not how borders should be set. Probably there are (0r were, before they were overwhelmed demographically by French speakers) part of the Eastern Townships in Quebec where a majority might prefer to join the US rather than put up with the language police of Quebec but no one asks them or should ask them. The border was set and it’s done and not subject to a new election every year like you are electing a new city councilman. Invasion is a particular illegitimate way to change borders.
As far as Chechens go, the problem is that of natural resources & that ca. 30% of Chechnya was ethnically Russian- and now, less than 1%. Putin is, in the name of great Russian imperialism, doing great disservice not just to other post-Soviet European peoples, but also to Russians themselves, because not just Chechens, but also failed newly independent Muslim states like Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan.... are flooding Russia with unassimilable growing alien masses.Russian imperialism is a death knell for ethnic Russians, too.Just- nation state remains the great accomplishment of modernity, despite its flaws. It is applicable mostly to the global north, and very rarely to the global south (the Qatar nation?).
You're simply taking "Empire" as the default, declaring it to be the natural state. But people are not atoms in the pop into existence in a sea of other people. People are actually born into and exist as a part of a family, from a particular tribe or nation with their own genes, language, religion, traditions, history--"culture". Biology is way, way, way more natural and fundamental than empire. Again LOL. Where do you get this stuff?
These creaky old empires--like your beloved Jew friendly Austrians--launched the Great War. Then the Japanese, Germans and Russians looking to boss around more people launched an even bigger war ... grating against and bringing in the British, French, Dutch, American empires and the Chinese and a whole lot of smaller nations.
Seriously how much worse can you do?
Yeah, the exact boundaries of nations--where they aren't on islands and sometimes even where they are--can be messy. But once you get boundaries squared away--which is quite tractable between good faith nationalists (even if you need to swap territory)--things get much more peaceful. Post-War the Allies jacked around millions of people--mostly Germans. But the Europe of nations that resulted was ridiculously more peaceful. The conflict spots were some tiny multi-ethnic conflict areas--ex. Northern Ireland--or the Russians doing their thuggish imperial policing. When hot war broke back out it was in the remaining big unsorted area--Yugoslavia.
Nationalism simply works far, far better at conflict reduction than empire. Nothing has been more thoroughly demonstrated in the last century than that. Nationalism is far from perfect--particularly in the hands of people who do not respect other's nationalisms--but it's claims and hence its squabbling is pretty narrow. There is no natural boundary to an empire, so empire always means contention with other empires and nations ... as well as beating down the internal squabbles of disparate people jammed together.Replies: @Frau Katze, @Jack D, @Anonymous
You moved the goalposts. You originally stated "Conservative Americans do not support forced daily prayers".
https://www.thedailybeast.com/conservatives-will-use-the-fight-over-prayer-in-schools-to-attack-diversity
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/07/supreme-court-religion-schools-prayer-kennedy-carson/661365/
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/ryan-walters-oklahoma-schools-superintendent-tulsa-rcna101235
https://pres-outlook.org/2024/07/bills-to-enhance-religion-in-schools-spur-fights-between-faiths/
"You’re citing the Old Testament which has laws for Jews that Christians are not required to follow."
In light of Jesus' teaching, he considered the entire Old Testament to be the inerrant, written Word of God. Jesus said he came to fulfill the entire Jewish Old Testament (Matt. 5:17), which he referred to as “the Law and the Prophets” (Matt. 5:17; Luke 24:26–27).
"You think I am making up a Muslim rule? Why didn’t you just Google it?"
It's very complex.
https://aboutislamver2.aboutislam.net/counseling/ask-about-islam/artistic-things-forbidden-islam/
--Thus, the above-mentioned arts are generally permissible unless they cause an evil similar to one of the evils mentioned in the narrations/scripts above. Given all the above, we learn that Islam is not against any kind of arts in principle, as long as it does not violate its fixed and well-known moral stands.--Replies: @John Johnson
You moved the goalposts. You originally stated “Conservative Americans do not support forced daily prayers”.
I was referring to Muslim daily prayers.
Muslims have to pray 5 times a day and in Muslim countries they blast it over a loudspeaker. There is no American conservative equivalent.
I don’t support prayers in public schools and polls show that most American agree. It’s a couple Bible belt states that keep trying to circumvent the constitution. In any case that would not be the equivalent to everyone at work having to stick their ass in the air when a loudspeaker goes off.
You’re grasping at straws.
It’s very complex.
https://aboutislamver2.aboutislam.net/counseling/ask-about-islam/artistic-things-forbidden-islam/
Thus, the above-mentioned arts are generally permissible unless they cause an evil similar to one of the evils mentioned in the narrations/scripts above.
So you learned about their rule on drawing living things TODAY and you are trying to correct me on it?
You cited a blog but he doesn’t deny they are banned and tries to give some middle ground response.
Here it is from IslamQA:
One is drawing pictures of animate beings . It says in the Sunnah that this is forbidden.
https://islamqa.info/en/answers/39806/ruling-on-drawing-animate-beings
Most European art contains a living being. Thus most European art is Haram.
It’s quite clear and shows that this religion is not compatible with Western society.
You are clearly some White guy in the burbs that hasn’t been around Muslims and is unaware that they take this rule seriously. Dogs indoors and art containing living things are offensive to them. Muhammed in fact said very clearly that image makers go to hell:
https://islamweb.net/en/fatwa/84617/explanation-of-hadith-about-pictures
Here is a Muslim home decorating guide and have a look at the first rule:
The first rule that every Muslim considers when decorating a Muslim home is not to include any figurative objects in the design plan. This means, no art with human or animal shapes as well as no free-standing statues or animal figures in furniture or accessories.
https://mustansarjavaid.medium.com/islamic-perspective-of-home-decoration-things-dos-donts-b4d15143aedf
The Mona Lisa is Haram. So is practically all Roman art and Muslim raiders in fact destroyed most of the Persian art when they violently turned it into Iran.
Maybe actually read about this 7th century religion before trying to lecture someone else on it.
https://www.york.ac.uk/media/news-and-events/publiclectures/2019/IAC%20-%20Sussan-MAIN.jpg
https://mypersianart.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/persian-miniature-.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/04/Mir_Sayyid_Ali_2.jpg/440px-Mir_Sayyid_Ali_2.jpg
Now you’re deflecting. Let’s focus on your original claim— Conservative Americans do not support forced daily prayers. Clearly, by the sources I provided, they do.
“Muslims have to pray 5 times a day and in Muslim countries they blast it over a loudspeaker.”
So what? That may be their preference. No big deal.
“There is no American conservative equivalent.”
No, just those evangelicals who on their social media accounts demand that Americans turn back to God.
“I don’t support prayers in public schools and polls show that most American agree.”
Me, too.
“It’s a couple Bible belt states that keep trying to circumvent the constitution.”
It’s more widespread than you think.
“In any case that would not be the equivalent to everyone at work having to stick their ass in the air when a loudspeaker goes off.”
You’re being overdramatic here. Regardless, they have their own way to worship, and their ways of life keeps out the cultural rot of the West. Which essentially is what white American Christians seek—to purge our grotesque music, dress, and lifestyles.
“It’s quite clear and shows that this religion is not compatible with Western society.”
There isn’t one Islam. There are sects, trends, schools of thought and interpretations
“You are clearly some White guy in the burbs that hasn’t been around Muslims and is unaware that they take this rule seriously”
Now you’re just overgeneralizing.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/09/01/muslims-are-a-growing-presence-in-u-s-but-still-face-negative-views-from-the-public/
—Though many Americans have negative views toward Muslims and Islam, 53% say they don’t personally know anyone who is Muslim, and a similar share (52%) say they know “not much” or “nothing at all” about Islam. Americans who are not Muslim and who personally know someone who is Muslim are more likely to have a positive view of Muslims, and they are less likely to believe that Islam encourages violence more than other religions.—
No, AD is right here.
It is wrong to apply the Herderian principle of language= people as a dogma & stay at that. Simply put, great French medievalist Jacques le Goff was right: a people is a community of destiny that has become a community of character. Give or take, we all know who are European nations & that all of them deserve their own nation-states. And that parts of nations will remain in other nations’ states, which is not a big deal considering the progress of civilizational norms in the Eurosphere.
Wilson was right & the time of empires is gone. The nation state is the best possible framework for the development of a collective and individual- plus respect for others’ rights.
What is problematic is the following: Muslims, Indians, indigenous peoples, blacks… don’t fit the description. There is no Arab “nation”. Siberian tribes (Samoyeds, Chukchs, Ostyaks,..) are not capable of forming a nation state, any more than Navajos and Sioux.
As far as Chechens go, the problem is that of natural resources & that ca. 30% of Chechnya was ethnically Russian- and now, less than 1%. Putin is, in the name of great Russian imperialism, doing great disservice not just to other post-Soviet European peoples, but also to Russians themselves, because not just Chechens, but also failed newly independent Muslim states like Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan…. are flooding Russia with unassimilable growing alien masses.
Russian imperialism is a death knell for ethnic Russians, too.
Just- nation state remains the great accomplishment of modernity, despite its flaws. It is applicable mostly to the global north, and very rarely to the global south (the Qatar nation?).
Playing "God Save the Queen" for the US wouldn't even be much of an error, as the tune is also an anthem for us, albeit "unofficial". Both that and the "official" one set American words to a British tune.
That they play the top Google hit for "Hong Kong's anthem" rather than the CCP dirge is downright delicious.Replies: @notbe mk 2, @prosa123
Playing “God Save the Queen” for the US wouldn’t even be much of an error, as the tune is also an anthem for us, albeit “unofficial”. Both that and the “official” one set American words to a British tune.
Anacreon in Heaven is a thousand times better than the Star Spangled Banner.
https://aboutislamver2.aboutislam.net/counseling/ask-about-islam/artistic-things-forbidden-islam/Thus, the above-mentioned arts are generally permissible unless they cause an evil similar to one of the evils mentioned in the narrations/scripts above. So you learned about their rule on drawing living things TODAY and you are trying to correct me on it? You cited a blog but he doesn't deny they are banned and tries to give some middle ground response. Here it is from IslamQA:One is drawing pictures of animate beings . It says in the Sunnah that this is forbidden.
https://islamqa.info/en/answers/39806/ruling-on-drawing-animate-beingsMost European art contains a living being. Thus most European art is Haram. It's quite clear and shows that this religion is not compatible with Western society. You are clearly some White guy in the burbs that hasn't been around Muslims and is unaware that they take this rule seriously. Dogs indoors and art containing living things are offensive to them. Muhammed in fact said very clearly that image makers go to hell:
https://islamweb.net/en/fatwa/84617/explanation-of-hadith-about-picturesHere is a Muslim home decorating guide and have a look at the first rule:
The first rule that every Muslim considers when decorating a Muslim home is not to include any figurative objects in the design plan. This means, no art with human or animal shapes as well as no free-standing statues or animal figures in furniture or accessories.
https://mustansarjavaid.medium.com/islamic-perspective-of-home-decoration-things-dos-donts-b4d15143aedfThe Mona Lisa is Haram. So is practically all Roman art and Muslim raiders in fact destroyed most of the Persian art when they violently turned it into Iran. Maybe actually read about this 7th century religion before trying to lecture someone else on it.Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @J.Ross, @Corvinus
The only exception is Persian painting- but they’d never been orthodox on many matters…
The police have given the Southport stabber‘s age as 17. Does this mean they will not be giving us his name? The kid wore a hood, so we won’t have descriptions from witnesses. We may never know who he is– unless he turns out to be a Farage supporter. Then we’ll never hear the end of it.
So far the police have said it isn’t terror related. He’s originally from Cardiff in Wales, which does have a significant Muslim population, but lived with his family in a small village outside Southport, which doesn’t seem to be something Muslims would do. I’ll bet he had some weird sexual motivation.
The absence of ID for the stabber and the "no terrorism" statement are pretty damn suspicious if you ask me.Replies: @J.Ross, @Reg Cæsar
It is perfectly obvious what Kazyrov is up to. He has devised a long term, multigenerational strategy to win the Eurovision Song Contest.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franco-Columbian
Every province and territory has its own version, except Quebec. They don't need one. The best are those of NWT and Nunavut. There are fewer than 600 Francophones in the latter, but they have their own flag!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Canadian_flags#Francophone_peoples
https://flagmartcanada.com/collections/francophone-flags-of-canada
https://quebeccultureblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/cd-fr-flg1.jpg?w=584&h=425
I'm willing to bet there isn't an Anglophone flag for Quebec, though Redditors and others are working on it, and Montreal's flag features a St George's Cross.
No flag for English-speakers, but Russia has a flag for Ingush-speakers, neighbors and relatives of the Chechens. It has a kind of circling-the-drain vibe to it:
https://www.shutterstock.com/image-vector/ingushetia-flag-waving-background-vector-260nw-2391364557.jpgReplies: @Cagey Beast, @Frau Katze, @J.Ross
This one has a very smart design:
https://aboutislamver2.aboutislam.net/counseling/ask-about-islam/artistic-things-forbidden-islam/Thus, the above-mentioned arts are generally permissible unless they cause an evil similar to one of the evils mentioned in the narrations/scripts above. So you learned about their rule on drawing living things TODAY and you are trying to correct me on it? You cited a blog but he doesn't deny they are banned and tries to give some middle ground response. Here it is from IslamQA:One is drawing pictures of animate beings . It says in the Sunnah that this is forbidden.
https://islamqa.info/en/answers/39806/ruling-on-drawing-animate-beingsMost European art contains a living being. Thus most European art is Haram. It's quite clear and shows that this religion is not compatible with Western society. You are clearly some White guy in the burbs that hasn't been around Muslims and is unaware that they take this rule seriously. Dogs indoors and art containing living things are offensive to them. Muhammed in fact said very clearly that image makers go to hell:
https://islamweb.net/en/fatwa/84617/explanation-of-hadith-about-picturesHere is a Muslim home decorating guide and have a look at the first rule:
The first rule that every Muslim considers when decorating a Muslim home is not to include any figurative objects in the design plan. This means, no art with human or animal shapes as well as no free-standing statues or animal figures in furniture or accessories.
https://mustansarjavaid.medium.com/islamic-perspective-of-home-decoration-things-dos-donts-b4d15143aedfThe Mona Lisa is Haram. So is practically all Roman art and Muslim raiders in fact destroyed most of the Persian art when they violently turned it into Iran. Maybe actually read about this 7th century religion before trying to lecture someone else on it.Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @J.Ross, @Corvinus
Just admit that you made up “Islam.”
We have all been shocked by the long and angry list of things John Derbyshire claimed that he wanted to do to Golda Meir when he was younger.
But the "word" I'm taking on Putin is .... Putin's!--his words and his actions. This is a guy who blabbers on about Bessarabia and how the breakup of the Soviet Union was a tragedy. There's only one way a serious person can interpret all that. It's that Putin is a guy who thinks that the Russian Empire was a good thing and Russia just ought--by some sort of historical cultural wonderfulness--to be dominant culturally and politically across a vast stretch of territory full of people who are not Russian and do not want to be dominated.
And not just words, Putin fought a war--and leveled Grozny to keep Chechnya *in* Russia--an action which has not just zero, but tangible negative benefit to the actual Russian people. It would be like the US leveling San Juan during some Puerto Rican uprising for independence. Which might excite deep state imperialist types, but would have ordinary Americans going "Huh? This is stupid!" And Puerto Ricans even as mixed as they are are actually less trouble and threat (TFR 1.0) than the Chechens (2.7) are to Russia.
No Putin's ideology should have died a well deserved death after 1914--when the Russians and Austrians dragged the rest of Europe into the Great War. The whole history of the 20th century is one of imperially induced slaughter--rising Germany and Japan chafing at the existing imperial world order of the British and French and to a lesser extent Dutch and American empires and looking to build grand ones of their own. Then further conflicts as some empires--particularly the French--refused to let go. And the Russian Empire--reinvigorated by victory in the War--dominating and oppressing Eastern Europe and the Americans and Russians fighting proxy wars all over.
No, I don't need any guidance from our own deep state goons on Putin. I've got no use for Putin, or his imperialism--straight up. I don't swoon over the guy because he's better on queers/globohomo than our goons. Nor because he's in conflict with our deep state goons. And when a bunch of commenters here babble about "used to be Russian" or "historically part of Russia" (i.e. the Russian Empire) that only reinforces my point. It's a better world if the Hungarians, Czechs, Poles, Romanians, Latvians, Estonians, Finns, Georgians, Armenians, Azeris ... and yes even the Ukrainians and Chechens are not bossed around by Russians. (And the Russians had a leader focused on stopping the muslim immivasion and affordable family formation for Russians.) The one thing everyone sentient ought to be able to agree on after the last century is the right of various peoples to have their own nations and *not* be bossed around by other peoples.
Heck, I wish we normie Americans could get that--out from under the bossy parasitic immivasion loving goons--here in the USA.Replies: @Jack D, @YetAnotherAnon, @RadicalCenter
By their “agrees” and their replies shall ye know them.
Absolutely. Imagine all the people, living life in peace.
But… there are a few problems, especially in the case of Ukraine
a) the United States foreign policy establishment, as announced by Paul Wolfovitz and in “The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives ” (1997) by Zbigniew Brzezinski, have made it a major priority that Ukraine must not be friendly to Russia.
Now I don’t know what you think, but a study of post-WW2 history tells me that when the US makes something a major priority, they don’t pray a lot that it comes about – they do things to bring it about. Looking through my comments I must have quoted Brzezinski to you a dozen times, but it seems not to have had any effect.
Your idealism might be practicable – IF the CIA, MI6 and US Special Forces didn’t exist – but they very much do. Do you think the 2014 Maidan “just happened”?
b) Ukraine, like today’s US and today’s UK, is a multiethnic state, and one of its ethnicities is Russian. You know, the people who rebelled against the 2014 coup. Don’t they count?
c) moving south, there’s a very good reason (apart from geography, Chechnya is situated between Russia and Iran) why Russia needs Chechnya inside the tent. The Chechens, like the Afghans, are a rough bunch and good scrappers, but not what we’d call gentlemen in a scrap.
“When you’re wounded and left on Afghanistan’s plains
And the women come out to cut up what remains
Just roll to your rifle and blow out your brains
And go to your God like a soldier”
Russia have already had one very nasty scrap with the Chechens – the idea that the US would leave them alone is the acme of gullibility. They’d soon be in another scrap, where the Chechens had US weapons and satellite intelligence.
LOL. The whole “nationalism is new!”, “nations are made up!” is the new Jewish–anti-nationalist–orthodoxy. The old Jews–the guys who wrote the old part of the Bible–sure seemed to know what nations were.
That situation is much more the actual “artificial construct”. That exists only *because* there was an Empire there that conquered different peoples and suppressed internal conflict. In a natural order a tribe or confederation of tribes–a “nation”–generally controls a reasonably coherent piece of territory full of only their own peoples and spars occasionally (or a lot) with foreign tribes at its border.
You’re simply taking “Empire” as the default, declaring it to be the natural state. But people are not atoms in the pop into existence in a sea of other people. People are actually born into and exist as a part of a family, from a particular tribe or nation with their own genes, language, religion, traditions, history–“culture”. Biology is way, way, way more natural and fundamental than empire.
Again LOL. Where do you get this stuff?
These creaky old empires–like your beloved Jew friendly Austrians–launched the Great War. Then the Japanese, Germans and Russians looking to boss around more people launched an even bigger war … grating against and bringing in the British, French, Dutch, American empires and the Chinese and a whole lot of smaller nations.
Seriously how much worse can you do?
Yeah, the exact boundaries of nations–where they aren’t on islands and sometimes even where they are–can be messy. But once you get boundaries squared away–which is quite tractable between good faith nationalists (even if you need to swap territory)–things get much more peaceful. Post-War the Allies jacked around millions of people–mostly Germans. But the Europe of nations that resulted was ridiculously more peaceful. The conflict spots were some tiny multi-ethnic conflict areas–ex. Northern Ireland–or the Russians doing their thuggish imperial policing. When hot war broke back out it was in the remaining big unsorted area–Yugoslavia.
Nationalism simply works far, far better at conflict reduction than empire. Nothing has been more thoroughly demonstrated in the last century than that. Nationalism is far from perfect–particularly in the hands of people who do not respect other’s nationalisms–but it’s claims and hence its squabbling is pretty narrow. There is no natural boundary to an empire, so empire always means contention with other empires and nations … as well as beating down the internal squabbles of disparate people jammed together.
Especially after WW 2 there were big population movements. There had been German enclaves in Eastern Europe. They were expelled to Germany after the war.
And need I mention what used to be Yugoslavia?
Even the UK had a lot more than Anglo-Saxons: Welsh, Cornish, Scots. But the Anglo-Saxons got them all speaking English and since they were all Protestant the UK has held together quite well.Replies: @J.Ross
But nationalism is new!
Jews love a polyglot empire.
https://aboutislamver2.aboutislam.net/counseling/ask-about-islam/artistic-things-forbidden-islam/Thus, the above-mentioned arts are generally permissible unless they cause an evil similar to one of the evils mentioned in the narrations/scripts above. So you learned about their rule on drawing living things TODAY and you are trying to correct me on it? You cited a blog but he doesn't deny they are banned and tries to give some middle ground response. Here it is from IslamQA:One is drawing pictures of animate beings . It says in the Sunnah that this is forbidden.
https://islamqa.info/en/answers/39806/ruling-on-drawing-animate-beingsMost European art contains a living being. Thus most European art is Haram. It's quite clear and shows that this religion is not compatible with Western society. You are clearly some White guy in the burbs that hasn't been around Muslims and is unaware that they take this rule seriously. Dogs indoors and art containing living things are offensive to them. Muhammed in fact said very clearly that image makers go to hell:
https://islamweb.net/en/fatwa/84617/explanation-of-hadith-about-picturesHere is a Muslim home decorating guide and have a look at the first rule:
The first rule that every Muslim considers when decorating a Muslim home is not to include any figurative objects in the design plan. This means, no art with human or animal shapes as well as no free-standing statues or animal figures in furniture or accessories.
https://mustansarjavaid.medium.com/islamic-perspective-of-home-decoration-things-dos-donts-b4d15143aedfThe Mona Lisa is Haram. So is practically all Roman art and Muslim raiders in fact destroyed most of the Persian art when they violently turned it into Iran. Maybe actually read about this 7th century religion before trying to lecture someone else on it.Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @J.Ross, @Corvinus
“I was referring to Muslim daily prayers.”
Now you’re deflecting. Let’s focus on your original claim— Conservative Americans do not support forced daily prayers. Clearly, by the sources I provided, they do.
“Muslims have to pray 5 times a day and in Muslim countries they blast it over a loudspeaker.”
So what? That may be their preference. No big deal.
“There is no American conservative equivalent.”
No, just those evangelicals who on their social media accounts demand that Americans turn back to God.
“I don’t support prayers in public schools and polls show that most American agree.”
Me, too.
“It’s a couple Bible belt states that keep trying to circumvent the constitution.”
It’s more widespread than you think.
“In any case that would not be the equivalent to everyone at work having to stick their ass in the air when a loudspeaker goes off.”
You’re being overdramatic here. Regardless, they have their own way to worship, and their ways of life keeps out the cultural rot of the West. Which essentially is what white American Christians seek—to purge our grotesque music, dress, and lifestyles.
“It’s quite clear and shows that this religion is not compatible with Western society.”
There isn’t one Islam. There are sects, trends, schools of thought and interpretations
“You are clearly some White guy in the burbs that hasn’t been around Muslims and is unaware that they take this rule seriously”
Now you’re just overgeneralizing.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/09/01/muslims-are-a-growing-presence-in-u-s-but-still-face-negative-views-from-the-public/
—Though many Americans have negative views toward Muslims and Islam, 53% say they don’t personally know anyone who is Muslim, and a similar share (52%) say they know “not much” or “nothing at all” about Islam. Americans who are not Muslim and who personally know someone who is Muslim are more likely to have a positive view of Muslims, and they are less likely to believe that Islam encourages violence more than other religions.—
https://s.rfi.fr/media/display/2ce00ae0-13f4-11ea-b676-005056bf7c53/w:1280/p:16x9/a-coup-sf-jolly-pret_0.jpgReplies: @For what it's worth, @kaganovitch, @J.Ross
Well, he got the schnozz for it but I don’t think he is. The French got some pretty massive beaks themselves and nobody ever thought Gérard Depardieu or Charles de Gaulle was Jewish.
The Zerohedge article I read today about the whole affair does say he's Jewish. How they know I don't know. They also mention that the fat ugly broad at the center of the Last Supper "depiction" is Jewish as well.Replies: @Jack D
You're simply taking "Empire" as the default, declaring it to be the natural state. But people are not atoms in the pop into existence in a sea of other people. People are actually born into and exist as a part of a family, from a particular tribe or nation with their own genes, language, religion, traditions, history--"culture". Biology is way, way, way more natural and fundamental than empire. Again LOL. Where do you get this stuff?
These creaky old empires--like your beloved Jew friendly Austrians--launched the Great War. Then the Japanese, Germans and Russians looking to boss around more people launched an even bigger war ... grating against and bringing in the British, French, Dutch, American empires and the Chinese and a whole lot of smaller nations.
Seriously how much worse can you do?
Yeah, the exact boundaries of nations--where they aren't on islands and sometimes even where they are--can be messy. But once you get boundaries squared away--which is quite tractable between good faith nationalists (even if you need to swap territory)--things get much more peaceful. Post-War the Allies jacked around millions of people--mostly Germans. But the Europe of nations that resulted was ridiculously more peaceful. The conflict spots were some tiny multi-ethnic conflict areas--ex. Northern Ireland--or the Russians doing their thuggish imperial policing. When hot war broke back out it was in the remaining big unsorted area--Yugoslavia.
Nationalism simply works far, far better at conflict reduction than empire. Nothing has been more thoroughly demonstrated in the last century than that. Nationalism is far from perfect--particularly in the hands of people who do not respect other's nationalisms--but it's claims and hence its squabbling is pretty narrow. There is no natural boundary to an empire, so empire always means contention with other empires and nations ... as well as beating down the internal squabbles of disparate people jammed together.Replies: @Frau Katze, @Jack D, @Anonymous
Europe is a lot less mixed ethnically than it was before WW 1 & 2.
Especially after WW 2 there were big population movements. There had been German enclaves in Eastern Europe. They were expelled to Germany after the war.
And need I mention what used to be Yugoslavia?
Even the UK had a lot more than Anglo-Saxons: Welsh, Cornish, Scots. But the Anglo-Saxons got them all speaking English and since they were all Protestant the UK has held together quite well.
Not exactly. Wiki has, Replies: @Frau Katze
You're simply taking "Empire" as the default, declaring it to be the natural state. But people are not atoms in the pop into existence in a sea of other people. People are actually born into and exist as a part of a family, from a particular tribe or nation with their own genes, language, religion, traditions, history--"culture". Biology is way, way, way more natural and fundamental than empire. Again LOL. Where do you get this stuff?
These creaky old empires--like your beloved Jew friendly Austrians--launched the Great War. Then the Japanese, Germans and Russians looking to boss around more people launched an even bigger war ... grating against and bringing in the British, French, Dutch, American empires and the Chinese and a whole lot of smaller nations.
Seriously how much worse can you do?
Yeah, the exact boundaries of nations--where they aren't on islands and sometimes even where they are--can be messy. But once you get boundaries squared away--which is quite tractable between good faith nationalists (even if you need to swap territory)--things get much more peaceful. Post-War the Allies jacked around millions of people--mostly Germans. But the Europe of nations that resulted was ridiculously more peaceful. The conflict spots were some tiny multi-ethnic conflict areas--ex. Northern Ireland--or the Russians doing their thuggish imperial policing. When hot war broke back out it was in the remaining big unsorted area--Yugoslavia.
Nationalism simply works far, far better at conflict reduction than empire. Nothing has been more thoroughly demonstrated in the last century than that. Nationalism is far from perfect--particularly in the hands of people who do not respect other's nationalisms--but it's claims and hence its squabbling is pretty narrow. There is no natural boundary to an empire, so empire always means contention with other empires and nations ... as well as beating down the internal squabbles of disparate people jammed together.Replies: @Frau Katze, @Jack D, @Anonymous
The post WWII order was unnatural and made possible only by mass murder and millions of deaths due to displacement. “Exchange of population” sounds so clean but in reality it is a horrible bloody affair with not only loss of lifetimes worth of property but many lives. Today’s monoethnic Poland is a peaceful (if perhaps somewhat boring) place but it NEVER existed before as a monoethnic country and this unnatural status was made possible only by the death and displacement of millions. This game was not worth the candle. There was no “natural” state of affairs where all the Poles would be in Poland and all Germans in Germany and so on. What you think of as being something that is “tractable between good faith nationalists” is anything but. It is the source of endless war. 80 years after the end of WWII, Russia won’t even give a few minor islands back to Japan.
Nor is it going to exist in the long run anyway. Last time I was in Warsaw I passed a Nigerian restaurant and of course they have millions of Ukrainians now. The only way in the modern world that you can keep your country monoethnic is it for it to be so poor, shitty and authoritarian that no one wants to move there. N. Korea doesn’t have an immigrant problem and neither does Cuba or Venezuela. Neither did Communist Poland but as soon as it became a normal democratic country with a high standard of living, people from other countries started moving there again. So the 1945-1990 interval was just a temporary situation.
https://www.amazon.com/Peasants-into-Frenchmen-Modernization-1870-1914/dp/0804710139/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?crid=C4QXIGAT91J1&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.Ic0ynKJmfQXRSeBUdhK52x3KH32OadYrz3raU6w1Omw4LURuSFKT6Gp0KCgR3muE.V14Zm0eN7XdVSrTLYWISFTaFq5bpPwT85bYbyUtgE4Y&dib_tag=se&keywords=peasants+into+frenchmen&qid=1722307887&sprefix=peasants+into+french%2Caps%2C164&sr=8-1Replies: @mc23
I was just just screwing around because his gesture in the photo is kinda pointing to himself (as evidence) and fwiw is clutching his pearls a little too firmly over the speculation.
The Zerohedge article I read today about the whole affair does say he’s Jewish. How they know I don’t know. They also mention that the fat ugly broad at the center of the Last Supper “depiction” is Jewish as well.
Having had some family members who were “valutaner” back in the day, I’m not sure this is entirely true.. Old Yiddish joke; Two friends in the “valuteh/tzinzen” business in the old country make a deal. They’ll pool their resources for one to emigrate to America and he’ll make enough money to bring the other one over as well. So, one of them emigrates and he writes back “Amerike is a gesholtener medina! Shtel zakh for, fuftzig grentzen und nisht k’ayn pruta zu machen dehrbei.” For non-tribe members = “America is a cursed land! Imagine, 50 borders and not a dime to be made off them!”
In other news:
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/rebel-archbishop-slams-olympics-vile-attacks-god-says-macron-obama-married-trans-men
Especially after WW 2 there were big population movements. There had been German enclaves in Eastern Europe. They were expelled to Germany after the war.
And need I mention what used to be Yugoslavia?
Even the UK had a lot more than Anglo-Saxons: Welsh, Cornish, Scots. But the Anglo-Saxons got them all speaking English and since they were all Protestant the UK has held together quite well.Replies: @J.Ross
They were expelled to Germany after the war.
Not exactly. Wiki has,
I was talking about Germans in eastern Europe.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_and_expulsion_of_Germans_(1944–1950)
Did any of those former Soviet countries ever want to join the USSR? Answer: No. There is no conspiracy to seduce them. Most of those countries want closer ties so they can maintain their independence from the dwarf tsar or whatever Russia comes up with next.
Sometimes the asshole neighbor is just an asshole and that doesn't have anything to do with the guy up the street.
Before the revolution the Russians viewed their conquered neighbors as "Little Russians" even if they wanted nothing to do with them. They viewed parts of Poland as belonging to them even though the Kingdom of Poland existed before Russia. After the revolution it was all Soviet territory and of course there was never a vote on if these countries wanted to join the great failed experiment.
If Russia left the Chechens alone there’d soon be “advisors” along to “help” them. Better Chechnya inside the tent urinating out than outside the tent urinating in.
Russia: Chechnya wants independence so we need to invade them.
Russia: DPR/LPR wants independence so we need to back them.
Putin is just another Tsar that is full of shit and can't even keep a consistent narrative for his pathetic defenders. He decreed DPR/LPR to be independent nations and has since taken them as vanilla territory. They don't even get semi-autonomous status like Chechnya.Replies: @unintended consequence, @Ennui, @Anonymous
Now do Israel.
And I should add that thanks to Hitler’s wonderful plan to make Germany German, instead of 1/2 million Jews they now have 5.5 million Muslims. Heckuva job, Dolfy!
BTW, yes “nationalism” is something new. Even the little island of Britain was divided into 3 countries and languages (not counting regional dialects) . People in France didn’t all speak French until recent times. Germany and Italy were not single countries at all until the 19th century. Nationalism as we know it is basically a 19th century invention. Even “languages” like French or Italian are artificial constructs – you pick some favored dialect and declare that to be the “national language”. Again, this is all much more recent than you think and made possible not only by the invention of printing but of mass media in the 19th century – continuous presses where you could roll out acres of textbooks and novels and newsprint and so on. As we can see from Putin’s bullshit, a lot of “national origin stories” are just fictions, as fictional as the she wolf that suckled Romulus and Remus or the cherry tree that George Washington chopped down.
This is not unlike the idea of “race as a social construct”. Nationality is not PURELY a social construct – that is quite obvious if you compare a Swede to a Sicilian. However, it is equally false that national identity is some hard and fast and eternal thing.
https://s.rfi.fr/media/display/2ce00ae0-13f4-11ea-b676-005056bf7c53/w:1280/p:16x9/a-coup-sf-jolly-pret_0.jpgReplies: @For what it's worth, @kaganovitch, @J.Ross
Are those Kabyle markings?
For those that don’t get it, Kaganovitch was referring to money changing (currency exchange). According to Another Dad, this is what you would call a classic Jewish middle manning occupation and while it may be lucrative to the middle men themselves (or at least a way to scratch a living), for everyone else it is a drag on the economy. The middle man’s gain is everyone else’s loss.
Perhaps one of the reasons why the US became the pre-eminent Western economy was precisely that there was a single currency, no border controls and no difference in legal requirements in a huge single market, so you could ship a Ford Model T anywhere in America for the same price and in the same currency and with the steering wheel on the same side, so you could make 2 million of them per year a century ago. In the pre-WWII era there was no market elsewhere in the world where you could do that kind of volume or anywhere close to it. (However, I am old enough to remember when the ads in Life magazine would have a little tag line that read “Price higher west of the Mississippi”.)
For a long time, I lived both east and west of the Mississippi. And north of it as well. All at the same time.
"Do you live east or west of the Mississippi?"
"Yes."
"But which side of it do you live on?"
"The outside."
I would cross it at least 500 times many years. Remembering Life at all dates you, Look even more. Life's last weekly issue came out in 1972. It still exists, though:
https://www.life.com/
Even in the relatively small UK there are some postcodes that attract higher delivery charges, now Royal Mail is privatised and competition is allowed.
The original idea of Royal Mail was based on what now would be called "social inclusion" - the idea that, no matter where you lived in the UK, the cost of sending a letter or parcel to you would be the same. People in isolated places did most of their shopping from mail order catalogues.Replies: @Reg Cæsar
OT — Israel appears to just be getting worse.
You're simply taking "Empire" as the default, declaring it to be the natural state. But people are not atoms in the pop into existence in a sea of other people. People are actually born into and exist as a part of a family, from a particular tribe or nation with their own genes, language, religion, traditions, history--"culture". Biology is way, way, way more natural and fundamental than empire. Again LOL. Where do you get this stuff?
These creaky old empires--like your beloved Jew friendly Austrians--launched the Great War. Then the Japanese, Germans and Russians looking to boss around more people launched an even bigger war ... grating against and bringing in the British, French, Dutch, American empires and the Chinese and a whole lot of smaller nations.
Seriously how much worse can you do?
Yeah, the exact boundaries of nations--where they aren't on islands and sometimes even where they are--can be messy. But once you get boundaries squared away--which is quite tractable between good faith nationalists (even if you need to swap territory)--things get much more peaceful. Post-War the Allies jacked around millions of people--mostly Germans. But the Europe of nations that resulted was ridiculously more peaceful. The conflict spots were some tiny multi-ethnic conflict areas--ex. Northern Ireland--or the Russians doing their thuggish imperial policing. When hot war broke back out it was in the remaining big unsorted area--Yugoslavia.
Nationalism simply works far, far better at conflict reduction than empire. Nothing has been more thoroughly demonstrated in the last century than that. Nationalism is far from perfect--particularly in the hands of people who do not respect other's nationalisms--but it's claims and hence its squabbling is pretty narrow. There is no natural boundary to an empire, so empire always means contention with other empires and nations ... as well as beating down the internal squabbles of disparate people jammed together.Replies: @Frau Katze, @Jack D, @Anonymous
The Hebrews literally called other peoples “nations.”
But nationalism is new!
Jews love a polyglot empire.
Aviation mystery: yesterday a United Airlines flight from Houston to Boston had to make an emergency landing in Washington after a biohazard situation arose. What’s being described only as a passenger’s “medical issue” created such a horrible stench that other passengers and flight attendants began vomiting. It would be extremely interesting to know just what this “medical issue” involved. There’s speculation it might have been a burst colostomy bag, which apparently stinks worse than death.
Endless parade of hott chicks in Cartagena, Colombia. I wonder if a white man would be able to score some chocha there or if you have to be Hispanic.
Yes!! From now on when horny young kids go to the nightclub to meet their future wives and husbands they shall dance to… BACH
https://youtu.be/wKxxGozHNZU?feature=shared
Although with a name like Roderick Spode, you probably prefer this:
https://youtu.be/bYrd3l9p1NU?feature=sharedReplies: @Inquiring Mind, @Inquiring Mind
Good for him.
I donated many hundred dollar bills and friendly cards and letters to him, happily, when I thought he was a legitimate part of UNZ.com That was all good.
Now, why waste our time here, where he lingers and humors his remaining readers, for some reason?
To oversimplify, he lost many of us because of three subjects:
1) Covid
2) Ukraine
3) Gaza
For a man who takes for himself the mantle of "Noticing," he surely has failed to Notice in those three cases!
Thus, some of us have had enough. Some of us now even suspect him! Yes, we are indeed suspicious, because either Steve Sailer is too stupid to Notice, or he is disingenuous.
Which is it, Steve?!
(Frankly, I don't expect an answer.) Go well, you pathetic SOB.
Prove me wrong.
Again: Prove me wrong!Replies: @Frau Katze, @Jack D, @Thomm
For how many years have I been pointing out the ((true purpose)) of this website, and how once I discovered the true purpose and who really calls the shots, I went to the bosses and a gig as a paid provocateur?
It is lucrative on a per hour basis. But to not see the true purpose of this website by now is funny.
Thanks,
– Mordecai Velvel Rabinowitz
Even France wasn’t uniform. There’s a book about how that happened.
Nationalism isn't a modern idea, we're just seeing the modern implementation under centralized power. The Romans started off as nationalists.
“I’ve not a fan of the US ruling powers but I don’t see why I should support the subjugation of the Ukrainian people to a totalitarian state where journalists get 5 years for questioning the government. Why don’t you explain how this war changes what you don’t like about America. Putin takes down some Ukrainian flags and replaces them with Russian flags while creating graveyards of Orthodox men. How does that change our status quo?”
You’ve lost the plot. Elsewhere I’ve said I don’t want the US deciding these matters or getting into the fray when a conflict doesn’t directly concern us. Now your crack about journalists reveals you as ignorant enough to think Ukraine has free speech. No one who reports Ukraine is losing from within Ukraine even lives to see the inside of a prison. Problem solved, I guess. Putin wasn’t ruling Ukraine or attempting to do so. “We’re fighting oppression” is such a great rallying cry but in this case means nothing. Was Putin planning on treating native Ukrainian speakers as badly as they treat native Russian speakers? Of course not. The US status quo currently consists of pretending the USSR still exists and all we have to do is beat those Ruskies. I’d like to bring my people into the present decade and century. I think they’d get a kick out of it and would probably make more relevant political choices to boot!
I thought the tag line was “Slightly higher west of the Rockies.” Or maybe I’m confusing this with baking directions for Denver.
For a long time, I lived both east and west of the Mississippi. And north of it as well. All at the same time.
“Do you live east or west of the Mississippi?”
“Yes.”
“But which side of it do you live on?”
“The outside.”
I would cross it at least 500 times many years.
Remembering Life at all dates you, Look even more. Life’s last weekly issue came out in 1972. It still exists, though:
https://www.life.com/
Not exactly. Wiki has, Replies: @Frau Katze
I wasn’t talking about Germans in Russia.
I was talking about Germans in eastern Europe.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_and_expulsion_of_Germans_(1944–1950)
I am a little confused. Ghost Dance is a Native American culture. Sufi thing you mention seems Islamic. Are you talking about Dervishes? They seem very non-threatening. Though, I would fall down due to dizziness before achieving any kind of ecstasy.
At this very moment a largeish undeclared Great Game is going on between the US and Russia, with the US trying to seduce as many of the post-Soviet countries and former Soviet allies as possible. Armenia is almost gone to the US, Georgian leaders seem to have decided Ukraine II is not for them, Moldova is currently disputed.
All kinds of dodgy dealings in Dagestan and similar places. Those Special Forces Hercules aren't flying to Tblisi and Almaty for the food.
Yesterday a lot of Wagner troops were ambushed and killed in Northern Mali by "Tuareg rebels".
If Russia left the Chechens alone there'd soon be "advisors" along to "help" them. Better Chechnya inside the tent urinating out than outside the tent urinating in.Replies: @John Johnson, @AnotherDad, @RadicalCenter
It is actually worth flying to Tbilisi for the food — and the wine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkuimX1bh6gReplies: @Bardon Kaldian
These are Mevlevis, the order founded by Rumi & they have stylized dances. But most Sufi “dances” are just like those seen in the Chechen video, simply chaotically hopping in a circle holding each other’s hands.
“I am old enough to remember when the ads in Life magazine would have a little tag line that read “Price higher west of the Mississippi”.”
Even in the relatively small UK there are some postcodes that attract higher delivery charges, now Royal Mail is privatised and competition is allowed.
The original idea of Royal Mail was based on what now would be called “social inclusion” – the idea that, no matter where you lived in the UK, the cost of sending a letter or parcel to you would be the same. People in isolated places did most of their shopping from mail order catalogues.
There was case in Alaska at least 35 years ago where an entrepreneur was charged ca. $70,000 for a huge shipment that would cost them over $100,000 to complete. The USPS didn't like being played like that, but there was nothing they could do about it.Replies: @epebble
You've lost the plot. Elsewhere I've said I don't want the US deciding these matters or getting into the fray when a conflict doesn't directly concern us. Now your crack about journalists reveals you as ignorant enough to think Ukraine has free speech. No one who reports Ukraine is losing from within Ukraine even lives to see the inside of a prison. Problem solved, I guess. Putin wasn't ruling Ukraine or attempting to do so. "We're fighting oppression" is such a great rallying cry but in this case means nothing. Was Putin planning on treating native Ukrainian speakers as badly as they treat native Russian speakers? Of course not. The US status quo currently consists of pretending the USSR still exists and all we have to do is beat those Ruskies. I'd like to bring my people into the present decade and century. I think they'd get a kick out of it and would probably make more relevant political choices to boot!Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
Academic Alexey Tolochko is currently under arrest in Ukraine for a 2015 monograph “Essays on Early Rus”
I definitely know what a case of the red ass looks like.
So far the police have said it isn't terror related. He's originally from Cardiff in Wales, which does have a significant Muslim population, but lived with his family in a small village outside Southport, which doesn't seem to be something Muslims would do. I'll bet he had some weird sexual motivation.Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
Whether true or not, reports that either stabber or his parents are from Rwanda.
The absence of ID for the stabber and the “no terrorism” statement are pretty damn suspicious if you ask me.
According to the Legal Eagle vlog, that there are so many "Florida man" stories isn't necessarily a sign of a weirder populace. It's just that under the Sunshine State's sunshine laws, it is much easier and quicker for the press to get information about such incidents.
Whether the press spreads them around the world or quietly sits on them is their decision.
Much of this was caused by US intervention in WW1 and Wilson’s horrible idea of self-determination and the sick joke that is democracy.
Better the Hapsburgs, better the Kaiser, better the Tsar than what came after.
Jack, for somebody against all this, I find it odd you are so pro-Ukrainian considering the nationalist and tribalist overtones of that movement. AD has nothing on your average Galician knuckledragger.
https://youtu.be/YvKjFmDrItg?si=AEx41OsXgLXVgDvk
Speaking of the Religion of Peace, I imagine Paris is hunkered down over that blasphemous portrayal of Muhammad's Revelations in Thomas Jolly's opening ceremonies.
I'm kidding of course. Thomas Jolly may be a decadent Jewish homosexual but he's no fool. No need to have a Charlie Hebdo-sized target on his back. Christians can always be counted on to bend over and take one for the team.Replies: @AnotherDad, @AnotherDad, @Bardon Kaldian, @anon, @For what it's worth, @Ennui, @36 ulster
Or more, as the case may be.
All I can say is, “It’s about time.”
Good for Chechyna.
What people may not realize is that for centuries, the Latin Mass and the Church banned a lot of music because it was basically pornography for the ears. Holy people KNEW and continue to know that lots of music remains a real danger.
You can’t go anywhere without hearing that infernal rap music, full of profanity, sex, violence, guns, marijuana, with gangbanger this, and gangbanger that. It’s vulgar, glorifies killing people (NO ONE hates black people more than other black people), and has constant howling about she-boons twerking on top of police cars, you know the drill.
Gym, elevator, corporate suite, supermarket, a hospital lobby (!), you name it, you CAN’T get away from this horrible c-rap. I mean, Snoop Doggy Dog is dominating the NBC Paris Olympics. The entire cast is black. I set my VPN to Australia to watch the Olympics for free from 9News in Sydney. I COULDN’T TAKE IT ANYMORE.
You know, THE orthodox rabbi record executives love sticking it to whitey with this infernal rap music. THE WORST.
Maybe the nightclub isn’t the best place to find a good spouse, regardless of the music.
Oh let’s face it-you are right (but she still is a no talent slut whore)
Believe me, I have no great love for Galician knuckledraggers. My mother was from near Lemberg (Lvov) and I know full well what they did to the Jews (and Poles) even without help from the Nazis. But that was a long time ago.
Ukraine now is not what it once was. If it was, they would have never elected Zelensky (in an election in which the far right received too few votes to have parliamentary representation). Naturally Russian extremism has encouraged Ukrainian extremism as well but if the Russians had left them alone I have no doubt that the knuckledraggers would have remained a small minority as Ukraine tried to remake itself into a modern, Western oriented nation. You only have to look at Poland (and Germany) to see that generational change also means political change.
It would have been my preference if Lemberg had remained the peaceful, orderly multi-ethnic paradise that it once was under the Hapsburgs but that train left the station long ago and thru no fault of the living Ukrainians who are now its sole remaining heirs (BTW, the battles of WWII bypassed Lviv and the center is virtually unchanged from 1914. There are ugly Soviet apartment blocks ringing the city but the downtown looks like it is frozen in time. It’s as if a neutron bomb went off and killed 2/3 of the inhabitants without damaging the buildings at all). They have to make the best of what they have left and the best doesn’t include being a Russian puppet state.
The Zerohedge article I read today about the whole affair does say he's Jewish. How they know I don't know. They also mention that the fat ugly broad at the center of the Last Supper "depiction" is Jewish as well.Replies: @Jack D
They don’t know shit. Here is Jolly:
https://www.lemonde.fr/m-le-mag/article/2022/01/15/thomas-jolly-metteur-en-scene-quand-ma-grand-mere-est-entree-pour-la-premiere-fois-sur-le-plateau-j-ai-pleure-a-torrents_6109577_4500055.html
Maybe these were Jewish catechism classes?
Americans don’t understand that France has a history of anti-clericalism going back to the French Revolution. In much of Europe, the Catholic Church is considered a regressive force by some. A large % of the French population are atheists and not just in the American sense of not caring about religion either way but being actively opposed to religion. Many French think of the Catholic Church in the same way that the Men of Unz think about Jews. In France it’s illegal to wear any sort of religious garb or symbol in public schools or offices because the state is supposed to be secular.
Billy Joel was raised Catholic. I guess he's not jewish either. I do find it hilarious that you of all people frequently employ the "jewish is just a religion" deceit.
...and who am I more inclined to believe is full of shit: ZH or Jag D?
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMReplies: @For what it's worth
Ukraine and Merkel shredded the Minsk Accords. Don't you remember? You obviously can't hold too many things in mind at one time. Putin doesn't loot Walmart. Unfortunately some of our US minorities do loot thinking of it as a form of reparations. There are probably some Jamaicans doing this but mostly it's an American black behavior which has nothing to do with Russia. Your neurons not firing today or something? It's like you don't read English so well today. What's your first language?
Obviously Americans issues with foreign policy cannibalizing domestic resources is of no concern to you. Mind your business, please.Replies: @HA
“Putin doesn’t loot Walmart.”
He certainly doles out money to those who do:
Ouch. Have you wiped the egg off your face? Because I’m not done:
“Ukraine and Merkel shredded the Minsk Accords. Don’t you remember?”
You’re the one with the Swiss-cheese memory, fanboy. According to a 3-month monitoring mission by the OSCE, 90% of the violations they recorded came from the non-government-controlled areas of Donbass. I have no doubt that in the face of that shredding, Ukraine saw little point in trying to uphold any of that accord all by itself, but really, you need to read beyond your troll propaganda if you want to impress anyone outside your echo chamber.
“No one who reports Ukraine is losing from within Ukraine even lives to see the inside of a prison.”
War is a complicated endeavor with lots of opinions this and that. Have all the Ukrainian soldiers predicting doom and gloom as of a few months ago (when US aid was deadlocked) been executed? Prove it. You know those collaborationist parties that Ukraine banned? They were and probably still are convinced that Ukraine is losing and yet, despite being banned, all their legislators are still in office, and will likely remain so until the next set of elections. Gonzalo Lira likewise predicted plenty of failure. He made it to a prison before dying, but even that was only because he skipped bail in Kharkiv and decided to flee to Hungary on a motorcycle (even though Russia was just a few miles away), at which point his insatiable craving for cigarettes developed into double pneumonia that the prison doctors couldn’t cure.
Easy enough to end up dead in Ukraine after getting put on the Kill list. Of course many generals who might have been executed end up dying in combat against Russia before the Ukrainian military gets around to doing the job. Being in the Ukrainian military is not lucky.
Wrt Minsk, Merkel herself stated the agreements were made as a subterfuge to buy time so NATO could build up Ukraine's military. I doubt any monitoring of Donbas yields honest results. You haven't even made a coherent statement about it so who knows? You may be the source of disinformation here.
Wrt to Putin's political associates: They have always been many and varied. You have no point to make. Putin doesn't loot Walmarts or give BLM or Texans for Independence (yes!) orders. This is such a baseless accusation. Do you not have any factual material to work with today?
But... there are a few problems, especially in the case of Ukraine
a) the United States foreign policy establishment, as announced by Paul Wolfovitz and in "The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives " (1997) by Zbigniew Brzezinski, have made it a major priority that Ukraine must not be friendly to Russia.
Now I don't know what you think, but a study of post-WW2 history tells me that when the US makes something a major priority, they don't pray a lot that it comes about - they do things to bring it about. Looking through my comments I must have quoted Brzezinski to you a dozen times, but it seems not to have had any effect.
Your idealism might be practicable - IF the CIA, MI6 and US Special Forces didn't exist - but they very much do. Do you think the 2014 Maidan "just happened"?
b) Ukraine, like today's US and today's UK, is a multiethnic state, and one of its ethnicities is Russian. You know, the people who rebelled against the 2014 coup. Don't they count?
c) moving south, there's a very good reason (apart from geography, Chechnya is situated between Russia and Iran) why Russia needs Chechnya inside the tent. The Chechens, like the Afghans, are a rough bunch and good scrappers, but not what we'd call gentlemen in a scrap.
"When you're wounded and left on Afghanistan's plains
And the women come out to cut up what remains
Just roll to your rifle and blow out your brains
And go to your God like a soldier"
Russia have already had one very nasty scrap with the Chechens - the idea that the US would leave them alone is the acme of gullibility. They'd soon be in another scrap, where the Chechens had US weapons and satellite intelligence.Replies: @HA
“’The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives ‘ (1997) by Zbigniew Brzezinski, have made it a major priority that Ukraine must not be friendly to Russia.”
And how did they set about doing that? With pastries and Soros money the EU if they cleaned up their act financially..
How did your boy in Moscow choose to act on his insistence that Ukraine must continue to be friendly to Russia? He swiped large swathes of territory there, set up armed rebellions, and when that wasn’t enough, launched a full-on invasion.
Can you not understand that one of these is not like the other?
“I haven’t defended Putin. My complaint with the anti-Putin crowd…”
Don’t nitpick with pointless distinctions. Endlessly hectoring the anti-Putin crowd, without offering a word of criticism to the tireless pro-Putin boosters who continue to derail comment discussion after comment discussion with their slavish regurgitation of Moscow propaganda, IS a defense of Putin. I know fanboys have considerable cognitive dissonance issues to work through, but again, to the rest of us, it’s pretty clear who’s stepping outside their loyalties to the US, and it isn’t the ones pushing back against the Russa-stronk! faction.
If you’re not a paid troll, you may well be just a traitor, or a fellow traveler, or a useful idiot. They’re ultimately distinctions without a difference that are not worth arguing over. If you walk like a stooge, and quack like a stooge, prepare to be called out on it.
“Washington was right – stay out of entangling foreign alliances.”
It’s a little late for that, when bazillions of nukes are pointed at our cities. That being the case, we decided — very sensibly, I might add — to step in a few decades ago when the USSR was falling apart and push both Ukraine and Russia to the negotiation table to make sure the dissolution was peaceful. We even provided some security assurances to Ukraine about how their borders would be respected in exchange for them handing over their nukes.
We don’t have to apologize to Washington or anyone else for doing that, but having signed on the bottom line, it is in our interest to demonstrate that that signature means something. If Putin thinks our memories are collectively too short, and that we won’t back up what we sign, he’s not the only one, but so far, it has proven to be a costly mistake.
The absence of ID for the stabber and the "no terrorism" statement are pretty damn suspicious if you ask me.Replies: @J.Ross, @Reg Cæsar
It is being claimed (and is consistent with previous events) that British whites who discussed the stabbing online are receiving visits by police.
“Supposedly Biden searches also being scrubbed. I tried “Biden resig” and got nothing.”
Give me a break. Biden didn’t “resign” jack. He’s still president. He WITHDREW from the race, and when I type in ‘Biden withd”, the full completion appears. Why would only one of those terms be scrubbed and not the other?
Also, you don't have to think Biden resigned, to want to read articles on if he should. Duh!
Also, FWIW, I was getting autocomplete to work on both Biden resig... and Trump assas... a few days ago.
Not sure if it is nefarious or not. But it's something. Clearly people do search as I did. So why scrub it?
Speaking of pearl clutching, I’ve caught a fish!
Billy Joel was raised Catholic. I guess he’s not jewish either. I do find it hilarious that you of all people frequently employ the “jewish is just a religion” deceit.
…and who am I more inclined to believe is full of shit: ZH or Jag D?
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
But you're a Jew-baiter, so you're going to Jew-bait.
Think about it and get back to us about it using the term "holy f... sorry guys I got manipulated again. Thank you notbe mk 2 for pointing out another absurdity that cannot actually exist in real life when you really think about it using reason and logical analysis instead of just gonads and mere pure faith in the trustworthiness of my overlords. Thanks notbe mk2 for helping me think clearly, you are now five for five, how do you do it?"Replies: @Hunsdon
Man, the way I heard it, it wasn’t some measly 1.3 billion. 1.3 TRILLION is what I heard!
I don’t really follow the war much anymore, Jack. Has Ukraine “liberated” Bakhmut yet?
Not yet, but Ukraine is still fighting (and when it gets something approaching NATO air power needed to provide the NATO-standard air cover needed to take back territory in the NATO manner in which the NATO weapons we gave them were supposed to be used, it'll take a crack at Bakhmut again).
That's quite a long ways away, I suspect, but it's a lot more than can be said for the hot dog vendor who un-liberated Bakhmut in the first place. How is he doing these days?
Why is that? You were so hot and bothered for Russia to "liberate" Crimea. How did that turn out? Let's ask one of the people involved: How is Girkin doing these days, by the way? Any better than the hot dog salesman?Replies: @unintended consequence
JJ, brother, man, you’re going off script. It was supposed to be a 3 day operation . . . and now you talk about a 2.5 week operation? WHEN DID YOU FALL IN LOVE WITH THE DWARF TSAR, JOHNNY?
Even in the relatively small UK there are some postcodes that attract higher delivery charges, now Royal Mail is privatised and competition is allowed.
The original idea of Royal Mail was based on what now would be called "social inclusion" - the idea that, no matter where you lived in the UK, the cost of sending a letter or parcel to you would be the same. People in isolated places did most of their shopping from mail order catalogues.Replies: @Reg Cæsar
That has always been the rule here for first-class mail, whether to Pago Pago in the Southern Hemisphere, an APO military address in Europe, or to the elderly neighbor across the street. Packages sent by other classes differed by distance, but no one minded as that was still cheaper than first class. Books and periodicals had their own class with subsidized rates, but I don’t know if these were uniform.
There was case in Alaska at least 35 years ago where an entrepreneur was charged ca. $70,000 for a huge shipment that would cost them over $100,000 to complete. The USPS didn’t like being played like that, but there was nothing they could do about it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlotte_May_Pierstorff
The absence of ID for the stabber and the "no terrorism" statement are pretty damn suspicious if you ask me.Replies: @J.Ross, @Reg Cæsar
He’s 17, though. What’s the law on reporting the arrest of minors? Here, it differs by state.
According to the Legal Eagle vlog, that there are so many “Florida man” stories isn’t necessarily a sign of a weirder populace. It’s just that under the Sunshine State’s sunshine laws, it is much easier and quicker for the press to get information about such incidents.
Whether the press spreads them around the world or quietly sits on them is their decision.
“I almost never post on Russia and when I do it’s only to say ‘none of our business’.”
Like I said — the distinction between outright stooge and useful idiot is at this point immaterial.
“On that thread you admitted you are a woman,…”
I’ve neither admitted (nor denied) any such thing. Evidently, my gender is a matter of considerable (and rather creepy) fascination for you, but you really ought to try and keep it to yourself. It says far more about you than me at this point.
We iStevers just aren't comfortable with this new non-binary system.
Give me a break. Biden didn't "resign" jack. He's still president. He WITHDREW from the race, and when I type in 'Biden withd", the full completion appears. Why would only one of those terms be scrubbed and not the other?Replies: @Anonymous
I don’t know. Maybe imperfect coverage? Maybe some other reason? I don’t think it is because nobody is searching on it.
Also, you don’t have to think Biden resigned, to want to read articles on if he should. Duh!
Also, FWIW, I was getting autocomplete to work on both Biden resig… and Trump assas… a few days ago.
Not sure if it is nefarious or not. But it’s something. Clearly people do search as I did. So why scrub it?
Nope, Beethoven:
Although with a name like Roderick Spode, you probably prefer this:
But not that there is anything wrong with that!Replies: @RadicalCenter
Legend
Genius
Scoundrel!
correct) it seems that the Joo-obsessives so overtook some corners of the culture wars so completely that I never doubted that he was some kind of asshole who was born Jewish.
This without ever having looked into either Foucault or searched any "who is a jew" list either.
So if you're right, that's interesting, Joo-obsessives are apparently able to shape popular opinions, even mine.
Being a bit of a snob I blame the Jews.
Were I a gentile who knew few Jews but saw their names predominating various fields while being told that curiosity about the subject was verboten, I too would take to wondering what they were hiding.
Anyhow, unless he turns out to have actually been a glorious and wise man, there's no need to educate me further regarding Foucault. I appear who have gotten this far in life posessed of misinformation about the single fact I thought I knew about the fella so I figure I can live out the rest of my years without a great deal of additional elucidation.Replies: @For what it's worth
Spare us all your overwrought bloviating. People are claiming Jolly is Jewish without any basis other than the fact they hate him. That’s all.
Based on your recommendation followed by acclaimation I just watched “The Drop”. Indeed a good film that I hadn’t heard of. Thanks.
It got me thinking about how TV is a bit of a propagandist for a certain way of thinking and this way ot thinking isn’t accurate so it prisons the public’s perception of the problems and their potential solutions.
I wrote this in response:
https://ydydy.substack.com/p/movies-make-murderers-look-bad
But I got thinking further that we can’t blame Hollywood for giving the people what they want.
The way people interact on the internet is worse than any society of flesh and blood people EVER act in real life.
So why wouldn’t they believe that in the real world people are the same horrible?
Or perhaps what the internet and tv both show us is our own imagination of what we would be like if we could get away with it and we believe it even if it ain’t so.
It’s a serious topic but we live in the most proudly ignorant of times so our conversations rarely progress beyond capture-the-flag hurrahs for symbolic tribes.
“War is a complicated endeavor with lots of opinions this and that. Have all the Ukrainian soldiers predicting doom and gloom as of a few months ago (when US aid was deadlocked) been executed? Prove it.”
Easy enough to end up dead in Ukraine after getting put on the Kill list. Of course many generals who might have been executed end up dying in combat against Russia before the Ukrainian military gets around to doing the job. Being in the Ukrainian military is not lucky.
Wrt Minsk, Merkel herself stated the agreements were made as a subterfuge to buy time so NATO could build up Ukraine’s military. I doubt any monitoring of Donbas yields honest results. You haven’t even made a coherent statement about it so who knows? You may be the source of disinformation here.
Wrt to Putin’s political associates: They have always been many and varied. You have no point to make. Putin doesn’t loot Walmarts or give BLM or Texans for Independence (yes!) orders. This is such a baseless accusation. Do you not have any factual material to work with today?
No! The best place to meet your future spouse would be the BACH-ONLY DANCEHALL!!
The anti-clericalism in the regular French increased in the 1800s only with the introduction of “free” and mandatory state schooling, where atheist public school teachers put down Catholicism through repeated passive-aggressive remarks against Catholicism and giving bad grades to those children they knew came from religious families. This was the background to the psyops of 1968 and the Sexual Revolution.
Note that the active opposition of the atheist French towards religion is mainly directed against Catholicism. Regular French atheists don’t badmouth Jewish practices but support Jews due to the mutual anti-Catholicism, atheist French opposition against Islam is an afterthought that began only this century after Muslims started attacking Jews. (The French didn’t mind Goumiers attacking regular Europeans last century.) French atheists also bend over backwards for Dharmic individuals, whom they see as “enlightened” and “exotic”.
There was case in Alaska at least 35 years ago where an entrepreneur was charged ca. $70,000 for a huge shipment that would cost them over $100,000 to complete. The USPS didn't like being played like that, but there was nothing they could do about it.Replies: @epebble
In the department of strange things sent by mail, one can’t beat
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlotte_May_Pierstorff
Like I said -- the distinction between outright stooge and useful idiot is at this point immaterial.
"On that thread you admitted you are a woman,..."
I've neither admitted (nor denied) any such thing. Evidently, my gender is a matter of considerable (and rather creepy) fascination for you, but you really ought to try and keep it to yourself. It says far more about you than me at this point.Replies: @Reg Cæsar
You’re not Educational Realist, are you? The only other commenter who’s complained not about being misgendered, but being gendered at all.
We iStevers just aren’t comfortable with this new non-binary system.
Steve, a poor comparison. You would have to contrast American teens doing a Chechen dance with American teens doing a Maori haka, both would be lost in translation.
“Has Ukraine ‘liberated’ Bakhmut yet?”
Not yet, but Ukraine is still fighting (and when it gets something approaching NATO air power needed to provide the NATO-standard air cover needed to take back territory in the NATO manner in which the NATO weapons we gave them were supposed to be used, it’ll take a crack at Bakhmut again).
That’s quite a long ways away, I suspect, but it’s a lot more than can be said for the hot dog vendor who un-liberated Bakhmut in the first place. How is he doing these days?
“I don’t really follow the war much anymore, Jack.”
Why is that? You were so hot and bothered for Russia to “liberate” Crimea. How did that turn out? Let’s ask one of the people involved:
How is Girkin doing these days, by the way? Any better than the hot dog salesman?
If Russia keeps following its plan for the “denazification” of Ukraine like it did in Bakhmut, millions of Russian men will die. Bakhmut was literally a Pyrrhic victory for Russia. And yet they continue these idiotic WWI type meat grinder assaults to this day. Hundreds of Russian men are lost and Russia gains the rubble of a destroyed Ukrainian village. Rinse and repeat. Ukraine values the lives of its men more than it does a few acres of ruins.
And Bakhmut was taken only with the help of Wagner, which no longer exists. Prigozhin and Utkin are dead too. The revolution eats its own.
You crow about Bakhmut as if it was some sort of achievement for Russia but once the Putin regime has fallen, history will record it as something that brought shame and dishonor and not glory to Russia. In Germany, no one speaks anymore of the 1st Battle of Voronezh as a German victory even though at the time Nazis considered it as such. Your crowing will someday seem equally hollow. It is a token of your idiocy that you see it as something to crow about.
----------
My take is basically team stalemate. I think the modern battlefield, with roughly peer opponents is difficult for either side to make big advances on. In other words, Zalushni (sp?) was right.
I would not trust either side's claims of meat waves and kill zones. My Bayesian prior is equal losses on each side. I'm sure it is not exactly 1:1. But it's also not the 5:1 or 10:1 that NAFO or Russophiles claim.
So, given we don't know the losses (even of their own sides!), what can we assess? And that is territory. And both sides have been underwhelming, for more than a year. UFA barely got .1% ground in a prepared-for six month advance. And RFA has a little over six months, and at similar rates (despite all the "captured a village" hoopla you get on pro Russia YT channels...and yes, I watch them.)
Russia has been a little stronger lately. But still...UFA has very powerful allies. And Putin is getting old. And there is the issue of fighting for their country. All that said, absent a change in RFA regime, I don't expect UFA to win. But neither do I expect them to crack. So...here we go. After all, fat fooks like Lindsey Graham want to fight to the last Ukrainian.Replies: @HA
Clearly more Ukrainian soldiers have been killed in this conflict than Russian. Ukraine doesn't particularly value the lives of its men or it wouldn't have hosted a proxy war between NATO and Russia on its own soil. The leadership under Zelensky are grifters taking huge cuts of the money sent by NATO to sustain Ukraine's war effort. They win either way with their ill-gotten gains and their homes in foreign countries. The current leaders would have made realistic efforts at peace talks if they weren't utterly immoral nihilists. They don't care about Ukrainian people or the cities landed in the middle of an unnecessary war. Time for compromise on behalf of the Ukrainian people and a change of leadership in Kiev.Replies: @HA, @J.Ross, @Jack D
Micheal Koffman thinks that Ukraine stayed in Bakhmut too long and took losses they shouldn’t have. And Koffman is a pro Ukraine guy (literally gets paid to be), but is of the more realistic slanted half of the pro Ukraine analyst crowd.
———-
My take is basically team stalemate. I think the modern battlefield, with roughly peer opponents is difficult for either side to make big advances on. In other words, Zalushni (sp?) was right.
I would not trust either side’s claims of meat waves and kill zones. My Bayesian prior is equal losses on each side. I’m sure it is not exactly 1:1. But it’s also not the 5:1 or 10:1 that NAFO or Russophiles claim.
So, given we don’t know the losses (even of their own sides!), what can we assess? And that is territory. And both sides have been underwhelming, for more than a year. UFA barely got .1% ground in a prepared-for six month advance. And RFA has a little over six months, and at similar rates (despite all the “captured a village” hoopla you get on pro Russia YT channels…and yes, I watch them.)
Russia has been a little stronger lately. But still…UFA has very powerful allies. And Putin is getting old. And there is the issue of fighting for their country. All that said, absent a change in RFA regime, I don’t expect UFA to win. But neither do I expect them to crack. So…here we go. After all, fat fooks like Lindsey Graham want to fight to the last Ukrainian.
Nah, “off by 2x” and “off by 0.5x” errors are everywhere with older software. This never mattered because we were only using the software to figure out if something was e.g. 70 or 72 BPM – we were never using it to tell us if something was 72 or 144. The closest thing to an objective answer for that question is by asking musicians in the relevant genre how they would count it.
Why is that? You were so hot and bothered for Russia to "liberate" Crimea. How did that turn out? Let's ask one of the people involved: How is Girkin doing these days, by the way? Any better than the hot dog salesman?Replies: @unintended consequence
Why don’t you ever cite your sources?
“Hundreds of Russian men are lost and Russia gains the rubble of a destroyed Ukrainian village. Rinse and repeat. Ukraine values the lives of its men more than it does a few acres of ruins.”
Clearly more Ukrainian soldiers have been killed in this conflict than Russian. Ukraine doesn’t particularly value the lives of its men or it wouldn’t have hosted a proxy war between NATO and Russia on its own soil. The leadership under Zelensky are grifters taking huge cuts of the money sent by NATO to sustain Ukraine’s war effort. They win either way with their ill-gotten gains and their homes in foreign countries. The current leaders would have made realistic efforts at peace talks if they weren’t utterly immoral nihilists. They don’t care about Ukrainian people or the cities landed in the middle of an unnecessary war. Time for compromise on behalf of the Ukrainian people and a change of leadership in Kiev.
One think I have learned is that any time someone in an argument says "clearly" it means the opposite of clearly. If something was really clear then you wouldn't have to say "clearly" because the facts would speak for themselves.
Generally speaking, offense incurs more casualties than defense by a large factor. This is well understood by military analysts. The defenders hide in their trenches and bunkers and the attackers have to cross open territory. So if the Russians have managed to find a magical new way to take territory without manpower losses we have yet to hear of it. It seems like the opposite - as their armor is depleted they send men out in cheap Chinese ATVs and motorcycles.
If someone came to your house and stole half of the contents and then told you that if you didn't press charges they wouldn't come back to steal the rest, would you consider this to be a fair compromise?Replies: @unintended consequence, @J.Ross
Not openly.
"with an obnoxious loudspeaker"
Talk to the State Superintendent of Education in Oklahoma.
"strange bathroom rules"
You mean like non-gender restrooms?
"bans on pork, alcohol, dogs, being clean shaven"
Christians have their own prohibitions.
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/List_of_actions_prohibited_by_the_Bible#Food_and_drink
"and most European art".
Citations, please.Replies: @John Johnson, @BB753
“Christians have their own prohibitions.
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/List_of_acti”
Do you understand that Old Covenant rules do not apply to Christians? What an ignorant statement! Are you hindoo perchance?
But the "word" I'm taking on Putin is .... Putin's!--his words and his actions. This is a guy who blabbers on about Bessarabia and how the breakup of the Soviet Union was a tragedy. There's only one way a serious person can interpret all that. It's that Putin is a guy who thinks that the Russian Empire was a good thing and Russia just ought--by some sort of historical cultural wonderfulness--to be dominant culturally and politically across a vast stretch of territory full of people who are not Russian and do not want to be dominated.
And not just words, Putin fought a war--and leveled Grozny to keep Chechnya *in* Russia--an action which has not just zero, but tangible negative benefit to the actual Russian people. It would be like the US leveling San Juan during some Puerto Rican uprising for independence. Which might excite deep state imperialist types, but would have ordinary Americans going "Huh? This is stupid!" And Puerto Ricans even as mixed as they are are actually less trouble and threat (TFR 1.0) than the Chechens (2.7) are to Russia.
No Putin's ideology should have died a well deserved death after 1914--when the Russians and Austrians dragged the rest of Europe into the Great War. The whole history of the 20th century is one of imperially induced slaughter--rising Germany and Japan chafing at the existing imperial world order of the British and French and to a lesser extent Dutch and American empires and looking to build grand ones of their own. Then further conflicts as some empires--particularly the French--refused to let go. And the Russian Empire--reinvigorated by victory in the War--dominating and oppressing Eastern Europe and the Americans and Russians fighting proxy wars all over.
No, I don't need any guidance from our own deep state goons on Putin. I've got no use for Putin, or his imperialism--straight up. I don't swoon over the guy because he's better on queers/globohomo than our goons. Nor because he's in conflict with our deep state goons. And when a bunch of commenters here babble about "used to be Russian" or "historically part of Russia" (i.e. the Russian Empire) that only reinforces my point. It's a better world if the Hungarians, Czechs, Poles, Romanians, Latvians, Estonians, Finns, Georgians, Armenians, Azeris ... and yes even the Ukrainians and Chechens are not bossed around by Russians. (And the Russians had a leader focused on stopping the muslim immivasion and affordable family formation for Russians.) The one thing everyone sentient ought to be able to agree on after the last century is the right of various peoples to have their own nations and *not* be bossed around by other peoples.
Heck, I wish we normie Americans could get that--out from under the bossy parasitic immivasion loving goons--here in the USA.Replies: @Jack D, @YetAnotherAnon, @RadicalCenter
Excellent comment about Russians admitting massive numbers of non-Slavic central asians as permanent residents and increasingly, as citizens, while not doing enough for affordable family formation for their own core and founding people.
To be realistic, though, on current trends the remaining, aged, declining Slavs in the Russian Federation may find it wise to start studying islam within another couple generations. “Brits”, French, Swedes, Armenians, Greeks, and others as well.
As your friendly local dawah advocate might say, “Say your shahadah now and beat the rush” 😉
The Chechens are loyal only to their fellow Chechens. Right now their leader has a deal with the Russian boss so they nominally on "team Russia". But that is just tactical and if not advantageous in the future, it would change on a dime. They have zero loyalty to Russia, but are loyal to their own people--as it should be. For that I give them fair credit.
And, of course, I in no way shape or form want any of them around me.Replies: @RadicalCenter
Nah, you can send me a couple of those pretty, traditional, loyal white Chechen ladies anytime.
I’ll take two, in fact, as their particular cult allows for men with sufficient resources who can provide for and pay attention to and care for both well.
And you’re an outsider looking at a tribal society. I don’t think most Chechen families would consider you prime material (unless perhaps you’re wealthy).Replies: @epebble, @RadicalCenter
Naw, one of the things Chechnya got right, like a Michigan orchard, you got to get 'em yourself.
Indeed, it’s wrong to teach kids that only christianity is ridiculous and unnecessary.
How about a balanced diet of well-deserved mockery of Hinduism as well as all the “abrahamic” cults for the absurd, incoherent, irrelevant, unnatural, perverse, or needlessly cruel material in their man-made “holy books”?
The talmud and the torah (old testament), above all, but the other man-made “revelations from God” too.
“Why don’t you ever cite your sources?”
Unlike the fanboys, I pretty much always cite my sources. If you come across an error where I garbled the link for whatever reason, either on this thread or anywhere else, point it out, and I’ll fix it. For now, try clicking on that blue font on the sentence “How did that turn out?” in that previous comment.
That, through the magic of internet, takes you to an earlier comment that has the video featuring Girkin himself right in the body of the comment. Here, since you seem to be a little challenged by hypertext I’ll link it directly so. you don’t have to feel overwhelmed:
You also gotta click on that white triangle and if you can’t comprendo the original pa-Russkie, you gotta read the captions. Is that clear? Or better yet, just read the transcript that I helpfully provided.
Clearly more Ukrainian soldiers have been killed in this conflict than Russian. Ukraine doesn't particularly value the lives of its men or it wouldn't have hosted a proxy war between NATO and Russia on its own soil. The leadership under Zelensky are grifters taking huge cuts of the money sent by NATO to sustain Ukraine's war effort. They win either way with their ill-gotten gains and their homes in foreign countries. The current leaders would have made realistic efforts at peace talks if they weren't utterly immoral nihilists. They don't care about Ukrainian people or the cities landed in the middle of an unnecessary war. Time for compromise on behalf of the Ukrainian people and a change of leadership in Kiev.Replies: @HA, @J.Ross, @Jack D
“Clearly more Ukrainian soldiers have been killed in this conflict than Russian.”
Maybe if you’re a fanboy. The invasion/offensive side typically suffers significantly more casualties. I’m sure there are plenty of exceptions given some of the ammo differentials at various points throughout this conflict, but the very fact that Russian “experts” like Ron Unz-favorite Douglas Macgregor have to keep reminding us every few weeks that Ukraine is just a few weeks away from total collapse shows pretty clearly that the fanboys aren’t too clear about what is and isn’t clear.
Clearly more Ukrainian soldiers have been killed in this conflict than Russian. Ukraine doesn't particularly value the lives of its men or it wouldn't have hosted a proxy war between NATO and Russia on its own soil. The leadership under Zelensky are grifters taking huge cuts of the money sent by NATO to sustain Ukraine's war effort. They win either way with their ill-gotten gains and their homes in foreign countries. The current leaders would have made realistic efforts at peace talks if they weren't utterly immoral nihilists. They don't care about Ukrainian people or the cities landed in the middle of an unnecessary war. Time for compromise on behalf of the Ukrainian people and a change of leadership in Kiev.Replies: @HA, @J.Ross, @Jack D
People who don’t read Simplicius are like Indians staring at the Santa Maria. Tons of reporting in Western, pro-NATO sources about Ukrainian losses. One claim about 2,000 replacements (in a potentially 5,000-strong unit) squaring with official Russian claims of Ukrainian losses. Is Röpke a Putinist?
I’ll take two, in fact, as their particular cult allows for men with sufficient resources who can provide for and pay attention to and care for both well.Replies: @Frau Katze, @J.Ross
You’ll have to convert to Islam first.
And you’re an outsider looking at a tribal society. I don’t think most Chechen families would consider you prime material (unless perhaps you’re wealthy).
She’d have to be pretty hot before I’ll pretend to belong to any of the “abrahamic” cults.
But I knew a Turkish girl who might be worth “reverting” for, lol….
But I’m tall, white, have a big nose like the Chechens, and have a serious “TSA Watch List” beard going on. Rich enough by Chechen standards. And there would be salutary side effects, no? It would cause me to finally give up beer and pork (a horror worse to contemplate than most of their doctrines ;)
And I don’t think my dear wife would mind letting some younger woman deal with me part of the time.
I seldom click on links. Provide the address if possible. Lots of hackers on this blog.
I see the links to copy and paste here. I read on my own, not Ritter or MacGregor. They serve a military purpose. I follow Russian journalists more so because they function as typical journalists. I find it important to read a perspective that will never be provided by mainstream news sources. Also I’m actually the fan of BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. I think the economic revolution going on in the background will make the world economy larger and more prosperous than it is with Western hemisphere economic domination. I’m hoping I can invest in the East within a year or so.
----------
My take is basically team stalemate. I think the modern battlefield, with roughly peer opponents is difficult for either side to make big advances on. In other words, Zalushni (sp?) was right.
I would not trust either side's claims of meat waves and kill zones. My Bayesian prior is equal losses on each side. I'm sure it is not exactly 1:1. But it's also not the 5:1 or 10:1 that NAFO or Russophiles claim.
So, given we don't know the losses (even of their own sides!), what can we assess? And that is territory. And both sides have been underwhelming, for more than a year. UFA barely got .1% ground in a prepared-for six month advance. And RFA has a little over six months, and at similar rates (despite all the "captured a village" hoopla you get on pro Russia YT channels...and yes, I watch them.)
Russia has been a little stronger lately. But still...UFA has very powerful allies. And Putin is getting old. And there is the issue of fighting for their country. All that said, absent a change in RFA regime, I don't expect UFA to win. But neither do I expect them to crack. So...here we go. After all, fat fooks like Lindsey Graham want to fight to the last Ukrainian.Replies: @HA
“Micheal Koffman thinks…My take is basically team stalemate.”
FWIW, that’s not Michael Koffman’s take as of early this year, and that was when the US aid was deadlocked and things were looking grim indeed:
Since then, he’s become more pessimistic about Russia (one thing he claims is that no matter what happens, the overall picture to historians of the future will be to consider this whole thing a Russian loss), but maybe that’s my reading in comparison of what he was thinking when the aid was being blocked (and it’s not as if he claims it’s a slam dunk).
And “fighting to the last Ukrainian” is standard-issue fanboy tripe, which is all the more comical when paired with their side-tactic of claiming that things are going far too well in Ukraine for them to be receiving any aid in the first place. I.e. when they’re not claiming Ukraine is a week or two away from collapsing, they’re all but claiming that the war is a bunch of a crisis actors or something given how little evidence there is of it among all those happy partygoers and revelers in Kyiv and Odessa. The fanboys need to consolidate their lies a little better.
Please try to keep track of different people. I showed Kofman's view on holding Bakhmut (he thinks it was not worth it, is a division with other pro UKR types). And then I gave my OWN view on stalemate. I am not Kofman. I am not endorsing everything he thinks, nor him me.
Capisce?Replies: @HA
I’ll take two, in fact, as their particular cult allows for men with sufficient resources who can provide for and pay attention to and care for both well.Replies: @Frau Katze, @J.Ross
>send me
Naw, one of the things Chechnya got right, like a Michigan orchard, you got to get ’em yourself.
HA:
Please try to keep track of different people. I showed Kofman’s view on holding Bakhmut (he thinks it was not worth it, is a division with other pro UKR types). And then I gave my OWN view on stalemate. I am not Kofman. I am not endorsing everything he thinks, nor him me.
Capisce?
And you’re an outsider looking at a tribal society. I don’t think most Chechen families would consider you prime material (unless perhaps you’re wealthy).Replies: @epebble, @RadicalCenter
This is how Dagestanis (Chechen’s Soul Brothers) treat members of out-groups:
Billy Joel was raised Catholic. I guess he's not jewish either. I do find it hilarious that you of all people frequently employ the "jewish is just a religion" deceit.
...and who am I more inclined to believe is full of shit: ZH or Jag D?
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMReplies: @For what it's worth
You have no evidence he’s Jewish, and some pretty good counter-evidence.
But you’re a Jew-baiter, so you’re going to Jew-bait.
I wonder what the Zelensky fanboys will have to say when Kiev capitulates. The neocon gaslighting and delusion in this comment section is nauseating.
I wonder what will happen to the Putin fanboys when their incessant refrains of "Ukraine will capitulate in another two weeks, and this time we reallly, really mean it!!" start to ring hollow even to themselves.
But unlike the fanboys, I don't think it'll happen in another two weeks. That would be giving them too much credit.Replies: @BB753
I'm betting they'll disappear as if they'd never haunted this place at all then spend the weekend drinking hard liquor.
There’s nothing to be gained from discussing Russia and Ukraine here. Nothing will be learnt and no minds will be changed. It’s not a case of “steel sharpening steel” it’s more like yelling at a TV.
Please try to keep track of different people. I showed Kofman's view on holding Bakhmut (he thinks it was not worth it, is a division with other pro UKR types). And then I gave my OWN view on stalemate. I am not Kofman. I am not endorsing everything he thinks, nor him me.
Capisce?Replies: @HA
“I am not Kofman.”
I never said you were (though given how you formatted your response, it did seem at first sight that you were citing Kofman, or trying to make it seem like you were, whether or not that was your intention). I’m just saying that your view on this being a stalemate is not Kofman’s view, and in that sense I was a clearer than you were.
And plenty of people on the pro-Ukrainian side argue about whether or not Bakhmut was worth it. I think it’s a pointless argument without knowing how many people died on both sides, and that’s obviously a matter of some dispute. But note that even Pirgozhin came out and claimed it was all unnecessary, or something similar, and he’s not exactly pro-Ukrainian — he just spoke his mind (and showed us all, yet again, what that eventually leads to in Putin’s Russia).
Prigozhin attempted an insurrection in the middle of combat. Many countries would have put him to death immediately because he was a member of the military behaving this way. Putin chose not to do so and may actually have had nothing to do with the plane crash. That being said, it's possible Prigozhin faked his own death.Replies: @J.Ross
When I say "team stalemate", I don't mean that if an armistice is not reached (hot combat continues) that neither side will prevail until and through the heat death of the Universe. Of course, eventually the situation would change. But right now, neither side has the ability to make large gains within the next few months. The last substantial change of territory was in late 22.
Just look at the rate of territory change:
https://www.warmapper.org/stats
Looks kinda stalematey to me. As I use that word. Not literally a stalemate in chess.Replies: @BB753
“I wonder what the Zelensky fanboys will have to say when Kiev capitulates.”
I wonder what will happen to the Putin fanboys when their incessant refrains of “Ukraine will capitulate in another two weeks, and this time we reallly, really mean it!!” start to ring hollow even to themselves.
But unlike the fanboys, I don’t think it’ll happen in another two weeks. That would be giving them too much credit.
“I find it important to read a perspective that will never be provided by mainstream news sources.”
Yeah, right. The guy on the corner waving a sign about how the CIA raped him and his dog, and how the world will end in 10 days, is also good for “added perspective”. And unlike those Russian journalists, he’s actually able to say what he believes.
Moreover, I quoted you Girkin, who is not in any way a mainstream news source, and you got so ticked off that you forgot how blue-font hypertext works or something and demanded authorization. That tells me all I need to know about your interests in hearing what lies beyond your echo chamber.
And good luck with taking investment advice from Russian sources, but stay away from open high-rise windows — I’m sure those Russian experts would have alerted you early on how it would take Putin over two and a half years to carry out his special little mission.
Sorry about your dog but you had it coming.
Nothing to add today. You should probably do research instead of getting peevish with strangers on the Internet.
‘Yeah, right. The guy on the corner waving a sign about how the CIA raped him and his dog, and how the world will end in 10 days, is also good for “added perspective”.’
Sorry about your dog but you had it coming.
Nothing to add today. You should probably do research instead of getting peevish with strangers on the Internet.
“…Pirgozhin came out and claimed it was all unnecessary, or something similar, and he’s not exactly pro-Ukrainian — he just spoke his mind (and showed us all, yet again, what that eventually leads to in Putin’s Russia).”
Prigozhin attempted an insurrection in the middle of combat. Many countries would have put him to death immediately because he was a member of the military behaving this way. Putin chose not to do so and may actually have had nothing to do with the plane crash. That being said, it’s possible Prigozhin faked his own death.
“I wonder what the Zelensky fanboys will have to say when Kiev capitulates. The neocon gaslighting and delusion in this comment section is nauseating.”
I’m betting they’ll disappear as if they’d never haunted this place at all then spend the weekend drinking hard liquor.
I wonder what will happen to the Putin fanboys when their incessant refrains of "Ukraine will capitulate in another two weeks, and this time we reallly, really mean it!!" start to ring hollow even to themselves.
But unlike the fanboys, I don't think it'll happen in another two weeks. That would be giving them too much credit.Replies: @BB753
Who said two weeks? I merely said it will happen sooner or later.
Clearly more Ukrainian soldiers have been killed in this conflict than Russian. Ukraine doesn't particularly value the lives of its men or it wouldn't have hosted a proxy war between NATO and Russia on its own soil. The leadership under Zelensky are grifters taking huge cuts of the money sent by NATO to sustain Ukraine's war effort. They win either way with their ill-gotten gains and their homes in foreign countries. The current leaders would have made realistic efforts at peace talks if they weren't utterly immoral nihilists. They don't care about Ukrainian people or the cities landed in the middle of an unnecessary war. Time for compromise on behalf of the Ukrainian people and a change of leadership in Kiev.Replies: @HA, @J.Ross, @Jack D
“Clearly”
One think I have learned is that any time someone in an argument says “clearly” it means the opposite of clearly. If something was really clear then you wouldn’t have to say “clearly” because the facts would speak for themselves.
Generally speaking, offense incurs more casualties than defense by a large factor. This is well understood by military analysts. The defenders hide in their trenches and bunkers and the attackers have to cross open territory. So if the Russians have managed to find a magical new way to take territory without manpower losses we have yet to hear of it. It seems like the opposite – as their armor is depleted they send men out in cheap Chinese ATVs and motorcycles.
If someone came to your house and stole half of the contents and then told you that if you didn’t press charges they wouldn’t come back to steal the rest, would you consider this to be a fair compromise?
Motorcycles. Over a year ago they abandoned maneuver warfare in favor of long distance attrition. Not sure how you missed that memo. Lately they have atritted so much that they can take land, which they do slowly and surely. Defense enjoying a triple advantage over offense does not apply in this situation because of various well-known factors, eg, Russia enjoys huge advantages and can properly cycle their personnel; Ukraine, out of sheer lack of people, puts off rotation until elite units surrender out of exhaustion. No Ukrainian unit is at strength, and many have been completely destroyed and completely rebuilt multiple times; Russia is taking in volunteers and talking abput raising a new army corps.
Read Simplicius.
One think I have learned is that any time someone in an argument says "clearly" it means the opposite of clearly. If something was really clear then you wouldn't have to say "clearly" because the facts would speak for themselves.
Generally speaking, offense incurs more casualties than defense by a large factor. This is well understood by military analysts. The defenders hide in their trenches and bunkers and the attackers have to cross open territory. So if the Russians have managed to find a magical new way to take territory without manpower losses we have yet to hear of it. It seems like the opposite - as their armor is depleted they send men out in cheap Chinese ATVs and motorcycles.
If someone came to your house and stole half of the contents and then told you that if you didn't press charges they wouldn't come back to steal the rest, would you consider this to be a fair compromise?Replies: @unintended consequence, @J.Ross
Clearly you have no numbers backing your assertions but I have read estimates of losses made by reputable sources ( that I will look up later clearly not now) that say Ukrainian losses are greater. Russia has a larger army along with a far more plentiful supply of bullets. In absolute numbers and percentage, Ukraine’s losses range from 5:1 to 10:1.
According to rational sources, Russia’s losses are 3:1.
“Who said two weeks?”
I was referring to Macgregor, and gems like this:
That was uttered in March of 2022. O this one, three months later:
As for you, keep holding your breath for that lowland pincer movement in Kherson. Because Kherson is key, isn’t that right?
And anyone who disagrees clearly knows nothing about military strategy.
One think I have learned is that any time someone in an argument says "clearly" it means the opposite of clearly. If something was really clear then you wouldn't have to say "clearly" because the facts would speak for themselves.
Generally speaking, offense incurs more casualties than defense by a large factor. This is well understood by military analysts. The defenders hide in their trenches and bunkers and the attackers have to cross open territory. So if the Russians have managed to find a magical new way to take territory without manpower losses we have yet to hear of it. It seems like the opposite - as their armor is depleted they send men out in cheap Chinese ATVs and motorcycles.
If someone came to your house and stole half of the contents and then told you that if you didn't press charges they wouldn't come back to steal the rest, would you consider this to be a fair compromise?Replies: @unintended consequence, @J.Ross
So if the Russians have managed to find a magical new way to take territory without manpower losses
Motorcycles. Over a year ago they abandoned maneuver warfare in favor of long distance attrition. Not sure how you missed that memo. Lately they have atritted so much that they can take land, which they do slowly and surely. Defense enjoying a triple advantage over offense does not apply in this situation because of various well-known factors, eg, Russia enjoys huge advantages and can properly cycle their personnel; Ukraine, out of sheer lack of people, puts off rotation until elite units surrender out of exhaustion. No Ukrainian unit is at strength, and many have been completely destroyed and completely rebuilt multiple times; Russia is taking in volunteers and talking abput raising a new army corps.
Read Simplicius.
Prigozhin attempted an insurrection in the middle of combat. Many countries would have put him to death immediately because he was a member of the military behaving this way. Putin chose not to do so and may actually have had nothing to do with the plane crash. That being said, it's possible Prigozhin faked his own death.Replies: @J.Ross
And wonderful changes were made possible, big high level personnel shifts: was it all theatre? There was no purge of Wagner personnel, not even participants in the death drive. People working with the notion that Putin is a dictator trying to bring back the Soviet Union cut themselves off from obvious realities.
There are no rational sources on the NATO side. They’ve done a hatchet job on Russia to make it appear necessary to continue Cold War containment. Lying about Ukraine’s success in fighting Russia is just a way to keep the conflict going. I haven’t been able to retrace my internet searches yet but have seen rational sources. They are there but you have to dig a little deeper to find them.
You sound like a spiteful wife. Why bring up past mistakes? Everybody makes mistakes. However nobody in his right mind believes that Ukraine can defeat Russia. It’s only a matter of time.
Ah yes, because in your mind, 'spiteful' and 'wife' just go together. Knowing things like is one the reasons you feel quified to lecture others on how they clearly know nothing about women. What a wonderful household you must maintain -- quite the peaceable kingdom.
You do a whole lot of bloviating about how everyone clearly doesn't know this or that. Does that mean you sound like an abusive know-it-all husband,who expects the women in his household to shut up or else be labeled as "spiteful", or do you only limit your pejorative stereotypes to women?
"However nobody in his right mind believes that Ukraine can defeat Russia."
No one is expecting Ukriane to "defeat" Russia. Setting up ridiculous straw men to knock down doesn't mean you know anything about military strategy or geopolitics or whatever. It just means you're kind of a weasel.
I suspect that, even now, they'd settle for peace that doesn't require them to gut their army and allows them to enter into security agreements more substantive than the one Russia just shredded to bits. But given that Putin has never offered anything like that, I guess it'll be a while before we can tell.Replies: @BB753
I think people load the term “stalemate” too much. Don’t you dare say it…almost. And there is a lot of political issues with how things are said, in the press, by the think tank community. (E.g. look at how long it took for the admission that the counterattack had “failed”. Mick Ryan was calling it “partial success”.)
When I say “team stalemate”, I don’t mean that if an armistice is not reached (hot combat continues) that neither side will prevail until and through the heat death of the Universe. Of course, eventually the situation would change. But right now, neither side has the ability to make large gains within the next few months. The last substantial change of territory was in late 22.
Just look at the rate of territory change:
https://www.warmapper.org/stats
Looks kinda stalematey to me. As I use that word. Not literally a stalemate in chess.
Only a deluded fool would believe it's a stalemate, just as the Eastern front is collapsing.
https://youtu.be/wKxxGozHNZU?feature=shared
Although with a name like Roderick Spode, you probably prefer this:
https://youtu.be/bYrd3l9p1NU?feature=sharedReplies: @Inquiring Mind, @Inquiring Mind
As a dance aficionado, even I think the 1920’s style Honoria and Bertie dance video is just so gay.
But not that there is anything wrong with that!
As Mr. Kadyrov would rightly tell you if you ask.
https://youtu.be/wKxxGozHNZU?feature=shared
Although with a name like Roderick Spode, you probably prefer this:
https://youtu.be/bYrd3l9p1NU?feature=sharedReplies: @Inquiring Mind, @Inquiring Mind
Ludvig van Beethoven
Legend
Genius
Scoundrel!
“You sound like a spiteful wife.”
Ah yes, because in your mind, ‘spiteful’ and ‘wife’ just go together. Knowing things like is one the reasons you feel quified to lecture others on how they clearly know nothing about women. What a wonderful household you must maintain — quite the peaceable kingdom.
You do a whole lot of bloviating about how everyone clearly doesn’t know this or that. Does that mean you sound like an abusive know-it-all husband,who expects the women in his household to shut up or else be labeled as “spiteful”, or do you only limit your pejorative stereotypes to women?
“However nobody in his right mind believes that Ukraine can defeat Russia.”
No one is expecting Ukriane to “defeat” Russia. Setting up ridiculous straw men to knock down doesn’t mean you know anything about military strategy or geopolitics or whatever. It just means you’re kind of a weasel.
I suspect that, even now, they’d settle for peace that doesn’t require them to gut their army and allows them to enter into security agreements more substantive than the one Russia just shredded to bits. But given that Putin has never offered anything like that, I guess it’ll be a while before we can tell.
Ah yes, because in your mind, 'spiteful' and 'wife' just go together. Knowing things like is one the reasons you feel quified to lecture others on how they clearly know nothing about women. What a wonderful household you must maintain -- quite the peaceable kingdom.
You do a whole lot of bloviating about how everyone clearly doesn't know this or that. Does that mean you sound like an abusive know-it-all husband,who expects the women in his household to shut up or else be labeled as "spiteful", or do you only limit your pejorative stereotypes to women?
"However nobody in his right mind believes that Ukraine can defeat Russia."
No one is expecting Ukriane to "defeat" Russia. Setting up ridiculous straw men to knock down doesn't mean you know anything about military strategy or geopolitics or whatever. It just means you're kind of a weasel.
I suspect that, even now, they'd settle for peace that doesn't require them to gut their army and allows them to enter into security agreements more substantive than the one Russia just shredded to bits. But given that Putin has never offered anything like that, I guess it'll be a while before we can tell.Replies: @BB753
Anyway, there won’t be an Ukrainian army left at this pace.
When I say "team stalemate", I don't mean that if an armistice is not reached (hot combat continues) that neither side will prevail until and through the heat death of the Universe. Of course, eventually the situation would change. But right now, neither side has the ability to make large gains within the next few months. The last substantial change of territory was in late 22.
Just look at the rate of territory change:
https://www.warmapper.org/stats
Looks kinda stalematey to me. As I use that word. Not literally a stalemate in chess.Replies: @BB753
It’s not a stalemate if one side has more machines, artillery, ammunition, planes, missiles and trained men and reserves. And if said side has a booming economy, a robust military industry, the largest and richest natural resources country on earth with a population in excess of 120 million, and powerful allies like China, Iran and North Korea. Now look at poor Ukraine: no economy to speak of, in default, no military industry, a small and dwindling pool of able-bodied men to recruit from but no way to train them safely and effectively, dependent 100 % on broke allies such as America and EU countries, with boutique, expensive and obsolete arms productions, just to keep on fighting another day and pay the civil servants and soldiers.
Only a deluded fool would believe it’s a stalemate, just as the Eastern front is collapsing.
“Anyway, there won’t be an Ukrainian army left at this pace.”
Right. From the looks of it, there’s a dire shortage of fresh cannon fodder. Odessa in particular seems completely barren.
Like I said, you fanboys need to patch up the holes in your narrative.
That young men and women are out shopping for stupid material things and partying with jello shots does not show strength instead shows a corrupt and decadent society that seems to expect that others will pay for the war and others will do the fighting and in the end not caring who wins.
Those scenes of Odessa are actually self-defeating, especially for the young people involved.
Those young men should be at the front lines and those young women should be nurses caring for those young men, patriotism alone should compel the people in those scenes to don an uniform and make a sacrifice instead of disco partying. Any normal society determined to overcome war obstacles bans material goods above the necessities and delays self-gratification just to reinforce the feeling of societal solidarity and having a mutual goal-nothing like what is happening in Ukraine (at least from the partying videos shown that are supposed to show the strength of Ukrainian society).
Instead, Daddy, being a politician, is skimming off his 10 percent from western aid so his precious offspring can party in Hamburg like its 1999 and 18 year old Igor is employed by a western aid institute to make youtube videos what a party town Odessa is; “see we are winning the war because our women are gyrating” while Natasha is being paid hand-over fist by western journalists for “translation” and other oral services.
Youtube videos of partying fit nicely into the social media of our time but they actually destroy the soul-its more important to be an influencer than a soldier-being a soldier is for someone else, I don’t need to sacrifice my lifestyle just because there is some sort of a war on.
I would be more impressed by videos of lean and hungry Ukrainians walking in rags digging anti-tank ditches-“hmm these people have a quiet determination, they’re going to win”.
In 1972 news cameramen touring Hanoi could not find young men and women buying at Prada or disco scenes of sexy young women gyrating instead there were grim scenes of people living in poverty foregoing immediate gratification in pursuit of a higher goal. Everyone touring Hanoi at the time was struck that it wasn’t a fun town at all unlike Odessa today. Scenes of Odessa being a party town are not scenes of strength and dedication and long-term planning but rather of decadence-a bizarre war-time society where again being a Youtube influencer is counted more highly than being a soldier.
Actually, Youtube videos of Odessa in 2024 are reminiscent of Saigon 1972 -partying and shopping never won a war yet (with the possible exception of War of the Second Coalition-but I have to check up on that). From first principles alone, discos should be banned in wartime just to remind those young people that they are expected to make a sacrifice for the good of society.
I’m not sure if the Afghans are culturally normally party and shop-till-you-drop animals, I really haven’t read the anthropological literature on that, but if they are they foregone that part of their culture in order to beat the Russkies and Yankees at least for the duration of the war. By the way, discos and shopping cost money-I see where my tax money is going.
It reminds me of Margaret Mitchell in her book describing how the blockade runners were bringing the latest hat ribbons from Paris to New Orleans and Savannah instead of rifles and cannons-you see weight-for-weight you could make more money bringing in the latest French fashions instead of less profitable armaments-the Confederate authorities allow it to pass through customs since it kept the women happy, hey that situation lasted for several years then it got f…ed up because like I said partying and shopping never won a war yet (not even the War of the Second Coalition-I checked it in the meantime), personal sacrifice and the ability to delay gratification have.
I’m kind of right in this, aren’t I?
Youtube videos of partying might be fun to watch (especially (let’s face it) for some Unz readers who never been to an actual party) but societally in war-time are self-defeating, no need for fanboys to patch up holes in any narrative.
Men in Odessa are refusing to be conscripted and are setting on fire military vans. Did you know it’s always been a Russian city?
You’re taking a tradcon fantasy view of Russia.
Russia has Europe’s largest atheist, Ashkenazi and Muslim populations.
Their Slavic population has been in decline since 1991.
It’s a nation of losers that it held together by a dwarf dictator who locks away dissenters.
Russia has Europe's largest atheist, Ashkenazi and Muslim populations.
Their Slavic population has been in decline since 1991.
It's a nation of losers that it held together by a dwarf dictator who locks away dissenters.Replies: @notbe mk 2, @RadicalCenter
“Its a nation of losers…” thank you for sharing that with us John-what is the old adage? “…it takes one to know…” think about it Johnny boy.
it all gets complicated by the traditional technique of either side making-up stuff and then publicizing it as coming from the other side -all sides do it in every war, nothing ever changes. Most people are skeptical when seeing or reading propaganda but it works on unintelligent minds like
Sounds like a goofy, complex law. Why not simply say no druggie genres of music allowed? The “too slow” part is strange as well. So the old Easy Listening Genre with stuff like Percy Faith’s “A Theme from a Summer Place” would be banned as well? The kind of stuff our culture warriors mock as “too old fashion.”
https://www.amazon.com/Peasants-into-Frenchmen-Modernization-1870-1914/dp/0804710139/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?crid=C4QXIGAT91J1&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.Ic0ynKJmfQXRSeBUdhK52x3KH32OadYrz3raU6w1Omw4LURuSFKT6Gp0KCgR3muE.V14Zm0eN7XdVSrTLYWISFTaFq5bpPwT85bYbyUtgE4Y&dib_tag=se&keywords=peasants+into+frenchmen&qid=1722307887&sprefix=peasants+into+french%2Caps%2C164&sr=8-1Replies: @mc23
The France of the Hundred Years is substantially the same as the France of today, same with the Spain of Isabella and Ferdinand and the Scandinavian countries were always distinct though they shared political leadership. The German Empire that Bismark constructed simply consolidated the historical lands of Germany. Modern Italy is the consolidation of the historical lands of Italy. There were always lots of local dialects. That’s an insoluble problem until the modern age.
Nationalism isn’t a modern idea, we’re just seeing the modern implementation under centralized power. The Romans started off as nationalists.
I think that Kadyrov is simply trying to prevent Operation Chaos from taking root in his nation. He can plainly see the ill effects that this program had on America and Britain in the 60’s and 70’s. Hey kids, take drugs and have casual sex with strangers! Don’t worry, this behavior won’t affect your future! Covers his face laughing. The people of other countries are going to protect their kids whether we like it or not.
And you’re an outsider looking at a tribal society. I don’t think most Chechen families would consider you prime material (unless perhaps you’re wealthy).Replies: @epebble, @RadicalCenter
Fair point.
She’d have to be pretty hot before I’ll pretend to belong to any of the “abrahamic” cults.
But I knew a Turkish girl who might be worth “reverting” for, lol….
But I’m tall, white, have a big nose like the Chechens, and have a serious “TSA Watch List” beard going on. Rich enough by Chechen standards. And there would be salutary side effects, no? It would cause me to finally give up beer and pork (a horror worse to contemplate than most of their doctrines 😉
And I don’t think my dear wife would mind letting some younger woman deal with me part of the time.
But not that there is anything wrong with that!Replies: @RadicalCenter
Actually there is something very wrong with that.
As Mr. Kadyrov would rightly tell you if you ask.
Russia has Europe's largest atheist, Ashkenazi and Muslim populations.
Their Slavic population has been in decline since 1991.
It's a nation of losers that it held together by a dwarf dictator who locks away dissenters.Replies: @notbe mk 2, @RadicalCenter
We need to distinguish between Muslims in Russia, and non-Muslims in Russia here. And recognize that any assessment of Russia’s culture must take into account the continuing rise of Islam.
A lot of Russia’s Muslims are secularized and not all that observant, especially Kazakhs we’re told.
But a lot of them actually believe in and practice islam and its traditional mores and customs. That’s a force within Russia for normal, healthy family formation, sex roles, and “lifestyles”, ma sha Allah — and laws designed to encourage and support them — that is only growing by the year.
You’re right, traditional conservatives in the West are deceiving themselves about how “traditional” and “socially conservative” and “christian” these non-churchgoing, fornicating, heavy-drinking, baby-murdering Slavic Russians are, with their zero to one child for most couples, many people never getting married, and their rampant perversion and gutter “pop” culture.
But the Muslim part of the Russian populace — the part that’s on track to be the dominant cultural force within several generations — can be a strong long-term influence towards “re-traditionalizing” the Russian Federation as the decadent Slavs age and dwindle.
Perhaps RF President Ramzan Kadyrov III can lead that movement someday.