IMPACT OF SOCIAL DISTANCING MEASURES FOR
PREVENTING CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019
[COVID19]: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-
ANALYSIS PROTOCOL
KELOMPOK 1
ULUL AZMI ( 19174035 )
MELDI ROSIMAH ( 19174052 )
RAHMIATI ( 19174036 )
MUAT MULIANA BANCIN ( 19174069 )
ULFATUL JAZILA ( 19174017 )
PRECEPTOR : . dr. Hadi Maulanza, M.K.M
Bagian SMF/ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat fakultas
kedokteran universitas abulyatama
FILE JURNAL
TUGAS STASE IKM KEL 1 (2016).pdf
Check
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
if done
TITLE
Identify the report as a
Title (3) 1 systematic review, meta-analysis, √ 1
or both
Check
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
if done
ABSTRAK
Provide a structured summary
including, as applicable:
background; objectives; data
sources; study eligibility criteria,
participants, and interventions;
Structured summary (4) 2 √ 2-3
study appraisal and synthesis
methods; results; limitations;
conclusions and implications of key
findings; systematic review
registration number.
Check if
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
done
Introduction
Describe the rationale for the
Rational (5) 3 review in the context of what √ 3
is already known
Check if
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
done
Introduction
Provide an explicit statement
of questions being addressed
with reference to participants,
Objectives (5) 4 √ 5
interventions, comparisons,
outcomes, and study design
(PICOS).
Check if
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
done
Methods
Indicate if a review protocol
exists, if and where it can be
accessed (eg, web address), and,
Protocol and registration (6) 5 if available, provide registration √ 5
information including registration
number.
Check if
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
done
Methods
Specify study characteristics (eg,
PICOS, length of follow-up) and
report characteristics (eg, years
Eligibility criteria (6) 6 √ 5-6
considered, language, publication
status) used as criteria for eligibility,
giving rationale.
Check if
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
done
Methods
Describe all information sources
(eg, databases with dates of
coverage, contact with study
Information sources (7) 7 √ 6
authors to identify additional
studies) in the search and date
last searched.
Check if
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
done
Methods
Present full electronic search
strategy for at least one
Search (7) 8 database, including any limits √ 7
used, such that it could be
repeated.
Check if
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
done
Methods
State the process for selecting
studies (ie, screening, eligibility,
Study selection (8) 9 included in systematic review, √ 8-9
and, if applicable, included in
the meta-analysis).
Check if
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
done
Methods
Describe method of data
extraction from reports (eg,
piloted forms, independently, in
Data collection process (9) 10 √ 11
duplicate) and any processes for
obtaining and confirming data
from investigators.
Check if
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
done
Methods
List and define all variables for
which data were sought (eg,
Data items (9) 11 PICOS, funding sources) and any √ 11
assumptions and simplifications
made.
Check if
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
done
Methods
Describe methods used for
assessing risk of bias of individual
studies (including specification of
Risk of bias in individual studies (10) 12 whether this was done at the study √ 12
or outcome level), and how this
information is to be used in any
data synthesis.
Check if
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
done
Methods
State the principal summary
Summary measures (11) 13 measures (eg, risk ratio, difference √ 10
in means)
Check if
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
done
Methods
Describe the methods of handling
data and combining results of
Synthesis of results (11) 14 studies, if done, including -
measures of consistency (eg, I2)
for each meta-analysis.
Check if
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
done
Methods
Specify any assessment of risk
of bias that may affect the
Risk of bias across studies (11) 15 cumulative evidence (eg, √ 10
publication bias, selective
reporting within studies).
Check if
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
done
Methods
Describe methods of additional
analyses (eg, sensitivity or
Additional analyses (12) 16 subgroup analyses, meta- √ 11
regression), if done, indicating
which were prespecified.
Check if
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
done
Results
Give numbers of studies screened,
assessed for eligibility, and
Study selection (13) 17 included in the review, with √ 8
reasons for exclusions at each
stage, ideally with a flow diagram.
Check if
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
done
Results
For each study, present
characteristics for which data
Study characteristics (14) 18 were extracted (eg, study size, √ 11
PICOS, follow-up period) and
provide the citations.
Check if
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
done
Results
Present data on risk of bias of
each study and, if available, any
risk of bias within studies (15) 19 √ 12
outcome level assessment (see
item 12).
Check
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
if done
Results
For all outcomes considered (benefits or harms),
present, for each study: (a) simple summary
Results of individual studies (16) 20 data for each intervention group (b) effect √ 10-11
estimates and confidence intervals, ideally with
a forest plot.
Check
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
if done
Results
Present results of each meta-analysis done,
Synthesis of results (17) 21 including confidence intervals and measures of √ 12
consistency.
Check
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
if done
Results
Present results of any assessment of risk of bias
Risk of bias within studies (18) 22 across studies (see item 15)
√ 12
Check
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item if Page number
done
Results
Give results of additional analyses, if done
Additional analysis (18) 23 (eg, sensitivity or subgroup analyses, meta- √ 11
regression (see item 16)).
Check if
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
done
Discussion
Summarise the main findings
including the strength of evidence
for each main outcome; consider
Summary of evidence (18) 24 their relevance to key groups (eg,
√ 12-13
healthcare providers, users, and
policy makers).
Check if
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
done
Discussion
Discuss limitations at study and
outcome level (eg, risk of bias), and
Limitations (18) 25 at review level (eg, incomplete √ 13-14
retrieval of identified research,
reporting bias).
Check if
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
done
Discussion
Provide a general interpretation of
the results in the context of other
Conclusions (19) 26 evidence, and implications for future
√ 14
research.
Check if
section/topic (page no) Item PRISMA checklist item Page number
done
Funding
Describe sources of funding
for the systematic review and
Funding (19) 27 other support (eg, supply of √ 14-15
data); role of funders for the
systematic review.
TERIMA
KASIH