Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

    • 15 views

    PRISMA 2020 Checklist

    Uploaded by

    Hanifa Erlin Dharmayanti
    This checklist outlines the key items to include when reporting a systematic review, including: 1. Identifying the report as a systematic review in the title. 2. Describing the objective(s) and inclusion/exclusion criteria for studies. 3. Specifying all information sources searched, including databases, search strategies, and date ranges of searches. 4. Detailing the study selection process, data collection methods, and risk of bias assessment approach. 5. Explaining the data synthesis methods, including analyses, exploration of heterogeneity, and sensitivity analyses used.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    PRISMA 2020 Checklist

    Uploaded by

    Hanifa Erlin Dharmayanti
    15 views2 pages
    This checklist outlines the key items to include when reporting a systematic review, including: 1. Identifying the report as a systematic review in the title. 2. Describing the objective(s) and inclusion/exclusion criteria for studies. 3. Specifying all information sources searched, including databases, search strategies, and date ranges of searches. 4. Detailing the study selection process, data collection methods, and risk of bias assessment approach. 5. Explaining the data synthesis methods, including analyses, exploration of heterogeneity, and sensitivity analyses used.

    Original Description:

    prisma 2020 checklist

    Original Title

    PRISMA_2020_checklist

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This checklist outlines the key items to include when reporting a systematic review, including: 1. Identifying the report as a systematic review in the title. 2. Describing the objective(s) and inclusion/exclusion criteria for studies. 3. Specifying all information sources searched, including databases, search strategies, and date ranges of searches. 4. Detailing the study selection process, data collection methods, and risk of bias assessment approach. 5. Explaining the data synthesis methods, including analyses, exploration of heterogeneity, and sensitivity analyses used.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    15 views2 pages

    PRISMA 2020 Checklist

    Uploaded by

    Hanifa Erlin Dharmayanti
    This checklist outlines the key items to include when reporting a systematic review, including: 1. Identifying the report as a systematic review in the title. 2. Describing the objective(s) and inclusion/exclusion criteria for studies. 3. Specifying all information sources searched, including databases, search strategies, and date ranges of searches. 4. Detailing the study selection process, data collection methods, and risk of bias assessment approach. 5. Explaining the data synthesis methods, including analyses, exploration of heterogeneity, and sensitivity analyses used.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    PRISMA 2020 Checklist

    Location where item


    Section and Item is reported
    Checklist item
    Topic #
    TITLE
    Title 1 Identify the report as a systematic review. judul
    ABSTRACT
    Abstract 2 See the PRISMA 2020 for Abstracts checklist. Hal 1
    INTRODUCTION
    Rationale 3 Describe the rationale for the review in the context of existing knowledge. Hal 2
    Objectives 4 Provide an explicit statement of the objective(s) or question(s) the review addresses. Hal 1-2
    METHODS
    Eligibility criteria 5 Specify the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the review and how studies were grouped for the syntheses. Hal 2
    (eligibility criteria)
    Information 6 Specify all databases, registers, websites, organisations, reference lists and other sources searched or consulted to identify studies. (Literature Search)
    sources Specify the date when each source was last searched or consulted.
    Search strategy 7 Present the full search strategies for all databases, registers and websites, including any filters and limits used. (appendix)
    Selection process 8 Specify the methods used to decide whether a study met the inclusion criteria of the review, including how many reviewers screened
    each record and each report retrieved, whether they worked independently, and if applicable, details of automation tools used in the
    process.
    Data collection 9 Specify the methods used to collect data from reports, including how many reviewers collected data from each report, whether they
    process worked independently, any processes for obtaining or confirming data from study investigators, and if applicable, details of automation
    tools used in the process.
    Data items 10a List and define all outcomes for which data were sought. Specify whether all results that were compatible with each outcome domain
    in each study were sought (e.g. for all measures, time points, analyses), and if not, the methods used to decide which results to
    collect.
    10b List and define all other variables for which data were sought (e.g. participant and intervention characteristics, funding sources).
    Describe any assumptions made about any missing or unclear information.
    Study risk of bias 11 Specify the methods used to assess risk of bias in the included studies, including details of the tool(s) used, how many reviewers
    assessment assessed each study and whether they worked independently, and if applicable, details of automation tools used in the process.
    Effect measures 12 Specify for each outcome the effect measure(s) (e.g. risk ratio, mean difference) used in the synthesis or presentation of results.
    Synthesis 13a Describe the processes used to decide which studies were eligible for each synthesis (e.g. tabulating the study intervention
    methods characteristics and comparing against the planned groups for each synthesis (item #5)).
    13b Describe any methods required to prepare the data for presentation or synthesis, such as handling of missing summary statistics, or
    data conversions.
    13c Describe any methods used to tabulate or visually display results of individual studies and syntheses.
    13d Describe any methods used to synthesize results and provide a rationale for the choice(s). If meta-analysis was performed, describe
    the model(s), method(s) to identify the presence and extent of statistical heterogeneity, and software package(s) used.
    13e Describe any methods used to explore possible causes of heterogeneity among study results (e.g. subgroup analysis, meta-regression).
    13f Describe any sensitivity analyses conducted to assess robustness of the synthesized results.
    Reporting bias 14 Describe any methods used to assess risk of bias due to missing results in a synthesis (arising from reporting biases).
    assessment
    Certainty 15 Describe any methods used to assess certainty (or confidence) in the body of evidence for an outcome.
    assessment

    You might also like