Scribd
Upload
24 views2 pages

Class Notes On RA 9155

The eviewer report evaluates a conceptual framework, highlighting areas such as clarity of concepts, logical flow, and theoretical foundation. It suggests improvements in defining key terms, aligning concepts with research objectives, and justifying variable relationships. Overall, while the framework is deemed strong, addressing its limitations and enhancing supporting literature would bolster its credibility and robustness.

Uploaded by

Charmalou Pampilo Ogarte
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
24 views2 pages

Class Notes On RA 9155

The eviewer report evaluates a conceptual framework, highlighting areas such as clarity of concepts, logical flow, and theoretical foundation. It suggests improvements in defining key terms, aligning concepts with research objectives, and justifying variable relationships. Overall, while the framework is deemed strong, addressing its limitations and enhancing supporting literature would bolster its credibility and robustness.

Uploaded by

Charmalou Pampilo Ogarte
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

eviewer Report on Conceptual Framework

1. Clarity and Definition of Concepts


The conceptual framework presents the key variables and theoretical foundations of
the study. The concepts are [clearly defined/lack clarity], and their relationships are
[well-established/need further elaboration]. A more precise definition of key terms
would strengthen the framework.
2. Logical Flow and Coherence
The framework is [well-structured/disorganized] and logically connects the research
problem, objectives, and hypotheses. However, some concepts require better
alignment with the study’s purpose, ensuring a coherent structure. Including a
diagram or visual representation would further enhance clarity.
3. Theoretical Foundation
The study integrates relevant theories such as [mention theories if applicable],
which support the research model. However, additional discussion on why these
theories were chosen and how they relate to the study’s context would
improve the theoretical foundation.
4. Relationships Between Variables
The framework effectively identifies independent, dependent, and
mediating/moderating variables. However, the relationships between these
variables should be more explicitly explained and justified with supporting
literature. Strengthening this section will help establish a clearer direction for
hypothesis testing.
5. Relevance to Research Objectives
The conceptual framework is [well-aligned/not fully aligned] with the study’s
objectives. If applicable, addressing gaps in the literature and ensuring that
the framework directly supports the research questions would enhance its
relevance.
6. Strengths and Limitations
The strengths of the framework include [clear structure, strong theoretical basis,
relevant variables]. However, limitations such as [lack of empirical support, weak
variable connections, missing theoretical justification] should be addressed to
improve robustness.
7. Citation and Supporting Literature
The framework is supported by relevant literature, but additional references to
recent studies (last five years) would strengthen its credibility. Proper citation of
sources is necessary to maintain academic rigor.
8. Overall Evaluation
The conceptual framework is [strong/well-developed/needing improvement] and
provides a solid basis for the study. Enhancing clarity, theoretical grounding,
and variable justification would further improve its quality.

You might also like