Scribd
Upload
27 views2 pages

Research Methodology

The reviewer evaluates the research methodology, highlighting the importance of justifying the chosen research design and sampling strategy. While the data collection and analysis methods are appropriate, there is a need for more transparency regarding validation, reliability, and ethical considerations. Overall, the methodology is deemed well-structured but requires further elaboration in specific areas to enhance clarity and rigor.

Uploaded by

Charmalou Pampilo Ogarte
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
27 views2 pages

Research Methodology

The reviewer evaluates the research methodology, highlighting the importance of justifying the chosen research design and sampling strategy. While the data collection and analysis methods are appropriate, there is a need for more transparency regarding validation, reliability, and ethical considerations. Overall, the methodology is deemed well-structured but requires further elaboration in specific areas to enhance clarity and rigor.

Uploaded by

Charmalou Pampilo Ogarte
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Reviewer Report on Research Methodology

The research methodology section is a critical component of any study, as it


determines the validity, reliability, and generalizability of the findings. Below
is my evaluation of the methodology used in the research paper.

1. Research Design
The study employs [qualitative/quantitative/mixed] methods, which are
appropriate for addressing the research question. However, there should be
more justification for the choice of [experimental, survey, case study,
ethnographic, etc.] approach, ensuring that it aligns with the study’s
objectives.

2. Sampling Strategy
The research utilizes a [random, purposive, stratified, convenience] sampling
method, which is [suitable/unsuitable] given the study’s scope. The sample
size is [adequate/inadequate] for achieving statistical significance. A
discussion on potential sampling biases and how they were mitigated would
strengthen this section.

3. Data Collection Methods


The use of [interviews, surveys, experiments, secondary data, etc.] is well
explained. However, details on how data collection instruments were
validated and tested for reliability would enhance transparency. If applicable,
ethical considerations such as informed consent and confidentiality should
be more explicitly discussed.

4. Data Analysis
The methodology outlines the use of [thematic analysis, regression, ANOVA,
coding methods, etc.] for data interpretation. While the analytical approach
is appropriate, further clarification on how variables were controlled and
potential biases minimized would be beneficial.

5. Validity and Reliability


The study addresses validity by [cross-validation, triangulation, pilot testing,
etc.], but a deeper discussion on external validity (generalizability) and
internal validity (cause-effect relationships) would strengthen the findings.
Reliability measures, such as test-retest reliability or inter-coder agreement,
should be elaborated if applicable.

6. Ethical Considerations
The study adheres to ethical standards, including [IRB approval, consent
forms, data protection measures]. However, a discussion on potential ethical
dilemmas and how they were addressed would improve this section.

7. Limitations and Recommendations


While the methodology is robust, the study acknowledges some limitations,
such as [sample size, potential biases, measurement errors].
Recommendations for future research should be expanded to suggest
methodological improvements.

Overall Evaluation
The research methodology is [well-structured/needing improvement] and
provides a solid foundation for the study. Some areas, such as [sampling
strategy, data validation, ethical considerations], require further elaboration
for enhanced clarity and rigor.

You might also like